083 2021 Anh
083 2021 Anh
083 2021 Anh
083-2021
Home
About the Journal
Instructions to Authors
Accepted Papers Volume 31, No. (6), 2021, December
Latest Issue
(Impact Factor 0.490; JCR 2020)
Journal Archives
Submit a Manuscript
Supplementary Series
CONTENTS
Supplementary Archive
Abstracting / Indexing Agencies Download
Title (Research Paper) Abstract
PDF
Publication Ethics
Editorial Board
Advisory Board
Managing Board GENETIC POLYMORPHISMS AND EXPRESSION PATTERN OF IGF-I GENE IN COMMERCIAL
ISSN (Print):
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
1018-7081
ISSN (Electronic):
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
Abstract | Full Text | PDF
7 Abstract
https://www.thejaps.org.pk/Volume/2021/31-06/index.php 1/5
Journal
Lan et al.,of Animal & Plant Sciences, 31(6): 2021, Page: 1559-1567 The J. Anim. Plant 083-2021
Sci., 31 (6) 2021
ISSN (print): 1018-7081; ISSN (online): 2309-8694
https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2021.6.0359
20SSOCIATION OF POLYMORPHISMS IN PROLACTIN RECEPTOR AND
MELATONIN RECEPTOR 1C GENES ON EGG PRODUCTION AND EGG QUALITY
TRAITS OF JAPANESE QUAILS (COTURNIX COTURNIX JAPONICA)
L. T. T. Lan1,#, N. T. H. Nhan2,#, L. T. Hung1, R. L. Soubra1, T. T. Gia2, L. H. Anh2, N. H. Xuan3 and N. T. Ngu2,*
1
School of Agriculture and Aquaculture, Tra Vinh University, Tra Vinh City, Vietnam
2
College of Agriculture, Can Tho University, Can Tho City, Vietnam
3
College of Food Technology and Biotechnology, Can Tho University of Technology, Can Tho City, Vietnam
*
Corresponding Author: ntngu@ctu.edu.vn
#
These authors contributed equally to this work
ABSTRACT
In the present study, the association between a 24-bp Insertion-Deletion (Indel) in the prolactin receptor gene (PRL), and
the polymorphic site NC_006091.5: c.25.144.C>A(T) in the melatonin receptor gene (MTNR-1C) was investigated in
Japanese laying quails. In total, 396 female and 132 male quails were selected for the experiment. The number of eggs
was recorded daily in individual quails for egg production and other reproductive traits. Every four weeks, one egg per
quail was randomly selected for external and internal assessment. PCR-RFLP and PCR-SSCP were applied for
genotyping the Indel, and the single nucleotide polymorphism in PRL and MTNR-1C genes, respectively. The data was
continuously collected until 48 weeks of laying. For the effects of PRL Indel, it was found that DD genotyped quails
provided a slightly higher egg yield in the first 24 laying weeks (155.1 eggs/quail); however, when the quails reached 36
and 48 weeks of laying, the difference in egg production was clear (P<0.05) in quails with II genotype (213.0 and 281.9
eggs/quail, respectively). In the MTNR-1C gene, six genotypes were detected at the polymorphic site, of which AA and
AT genotyped quails were better for egg yield in comparison with those baring other genotypes. For egg quality, only
albumen weight and albumen ratio differed from quails with II genotype to those of other quails in the 1-24 laying
weeks. In the later period (25-48 weeks), yolk index was the highest in quails baring DD genotype. For the MTNR-1C
polymorphism, the differences (P<0.05) were found in traits related to albumen and yolk; however, no genotype really
stands out in terms of egg quality. In conclusion, the two polymorphisms studied may be utilized in breeding programs to
enhance egg yield and egg quality traits in Japanese quails of which the PRL (II) and MTNR-1C (AA) alleles are
suggested.
Key words: Association, egg traits, Japanese quails, MTNR-1C, PRL
Published first online March 31, 2021 Published online Nov. 20, 2021.
1559
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
(Ayre et al. 1992, Soares et al. 2003). Some studies have internal egg properties, album and yolk were evaluated
shown that the presence of melatonin in follicular fluid using a tripod micrometer and a digital caliper. The yolk
and its levels are positively correlated with the quality weight was recorded and the proportion was expressed in
and maturity of oocytes (Nakamura et al. 2003, Shi et al. accordance with egg weight. Albumen weight was
2009, Tian et al. 2014). Recently, one of the ovarian determined by the difference of the yolk and the shell
melatonin receptors, melanin receptor 1C (MTNR-1C) weight from the whole egg weight. The yolk index was
has been defined in chickens, and its expression has estimated from the ratio of yolk height to yolk width and
shown a direct contribution to the reproductive process of the albumen index was calculated as the ratio of thick
hens and is therefore marked as a candidate gene for albumen to its thick diameter. In addition, the Haugh unit
chicken reproduction (Li et al. 2013). A similar mutation (HU) was determined from the formula of HU = 100 x
was also detected in Noi chickens, a native chicken breed log (AH + 7.57 – 1.7 x EW0.37), in which AH stands for
in Vietnam (Vu and Ngu 2016). albumen height (mm) and EW represents egg weight (g)
The current study was conducted to identify the (Nasr et al. 2016, Sari et al. 2012).
polymorphisms of PRL and MTNR-1C genes and further
DNA extraction and genotyping: Genomic DNA
investigate their association with egg production and egg
isolated from quails’ feathers (Bello et al. 2001) was
quality traits in Japanese quails.
subjected to amplification in a thermal cycler. In the
prolactin gene (Genbank number AB011438.2), the
MATERIALS AND METHODS primer pair was designed for amplifying the fragment in
chickens (Cui et al. 2006). The primer sequences were
Experimental quails: The quails studied were selected 5’-TTT AAT ATT GGT GGG TGA AGA GAC A-3’
from a breeding farm in Tien Giang province. In total, (forward) and ATG CCA CTG ATC CTC GAA AAC TC
396 laying quails and 132 male quails were selected. The (reverse). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was
birds were fed a grower diet (ME: 2,950 kcal/kg; CP: performed with an annealing temperature of 54 oC and the
24%) from 0 to 6 weeks, and a laying diet (ME: 2,850 subsequence genotyping by PCR-RFLP (Restriction
kcal/kg; CP: 21%) for the whole experiment. Clean water Fragment Length Polymorphism) of all birds was
was provided at all times. During the laying period, the completed by following the protocol described by Cui et
female quails were kept in individual compartments for al. (2006).
egg collection and the male was alternatively introduced For the MTNR-1C gene, forward (5’-
every 4 hours per day with the ratio of 1 male to 3 TGCCAGATAAGTGGGTTCCT-3’) and reverse (5’-
females. All quails were vaccinated against common AGCGTCCACGTCAGACAGAT-3’) primers were
diseases before the experimental period of 48 laying designed by the primer3 tool (Untergrasser et al. 2012) to
weeks. In detail, Newcastle virus vaccine was amplify a fragment of 164 base pairs (Genbank number
administered on day 1st and day 21st via eye drop and NC_006091.5). Polymerase chain reactions were carried
repeated every 3 months orally, and the vaccine against out with the following conditions: 95°C for 5 min,
coccidiosis was applied on day 5th and day 30th through followed by 35 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 55°C for 45 s,
drinking water. In addition, vaccines for chronic 72°C for 50 s, and ended with an extended cycle at 72°C
respiratory disease (CRD) and salmonella were given on for 5 min. Each PCR contained 10 µL, including 50 ng of
day 12th via drinking water and H5N1 vaccine was used genomic DNA, 0.25 M of each primer, 0.25 M of each
on day 15th by intramuscular injection. dNTP, 1x PCR buffer, and 1U/µL Taq DNA polymerase.
Egg production and egg quality measurements: Eggs The polymorphic site was identified by sequencing with
were collected daily at 4 P.M. and numbered to monitor Sanger’s method. For genotyping, the PCR-SSCP
individual yield. The eggs were then marked and (Single-Strand Conformation Polymorphism) technique
gathered in a storage room for 4 days before an was applied. In brief, the mixture of 8 µl of PCR product
incubation period of 17 days in an incubator. The and 10 µl loading buffer was heated to 95°C and
following parameters were recorded as phenotypic data maintained for 10 minutes to separate the DNA strands.
of reproductive capacity: total egg yield (per bird basis), The suspension was quickly transferred to ice and kept at
total egg hatched, number of fertilized eggs and hatched -20°C for 10 minutes. Before electrophoresis, the gel was
chicks, laying rate and hatching rate. cooled at 7°C for 30 minutes. The DNA mixture was
For evaluation of the egg quality traits, one loaded on gel and run at 10°C for 6 hours at 30 W. After
egg/quail was collected every four weeks with a total of that, the gel was stained with 250 ml of TAE 1X solution
12 eggs/quail used for quality assessment for the whole containing 25 µl of ethidium bromide (25 mg) for 30
experimental period. Eggs were weighed using an minutes and visualized under UV light of the gel imaging
electronic scale. After breaking the outer shells, eggshells system (Gel Logic 212 - Kodak).
were washed and dried for 24 hours before weighing to Statistical analysis: The association between genotype
obtain the ratio between eggshells and weight. For and egg yield and egg quality traits was analyzed based
1560
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
on the General Linear Model of Minitab software version (P=0.061) in quails with DD genotypes. In the next
16.2.1 (Minitab 2010), Yij = µ + Gi + ξij (where Yij: period, when the quails reached nine months of laying,
traits observed; μ: general mean, Gi: influence of egg yield was the highest in birds carrying the II
genotype; ξij: random error). Data is presented as Least genotype (213 eggs/bird; P<0.05). Due to similar
square mean ± Standard error. fertilized and hatching rates, the number of fertilized eggs
and hatched chicks was also higher in type II quails. The
RESULTS difference was even more apparent when eggs were
collected up to 48 weeks of laying with the highest egg
Total egg yield was associated with the insertion production in birds baring II genotype, while those with
or deletion of nucleotides in the prolactin gene depending DD genotype were the lowest (P<0.01). However, it is
on laying stages (Table 1). Considering only in 12 laying worth considering that quails with DD genotype
weeks, all reproductive parameters remained similar presented only at 3.9% in the population, whereas quails
(P>0.05); however, a tendency of difference occurred at carrying II genotype occupied 45.1% in the population
six months of egg yield with a slightly higher rate studied (396 individuals).
Table 1. Association between PRL polymorphism with egg production in different laying periods.
Genotypes
Parameters P
II (178) ID (n=203) DD (n=15)
1-12 laying weeks
Total egg yield 71.3±0.6 70.6±0.5 73.2±2.1 0.364
Laying rate (%) 84.8±0.7 84.0±0.6 87.2±2.5 0.364
Total egg hatched 67.3±0.6 66.9±0.5 70.0±2.1 0.333
Fertilized eggs 57.7±0.7 56.7±0.6 66.3±2.3 0.121
Fertilized rate (%) 85.7±0.6 84.7±0.6 87.2±2.2 0.312
Hatched chick number 53.2±0.7 52.1±0.6 56.9±2.4 0.125
Hatching rate (%) 92.0±0.4 91.7±0.4 92.8±1.5 0.731
1-24 laying weeks
Total egg yield 148.4±1.0 146.6±0.9 155.1±3.8 0.061
Laying rate (%) 88.3±0.6 87.2±0.6 92.3±2.3 0.061
Total egg hatched 140.6±1.0 139.4±0.9 147.8±3.8 0.087
Fertilized eggs 122.5ab±1.3 119.0b±1.2 133.7a±5.1 0.007
Fertilized rate (%) 87.1a±0.7 85.3b±0.6 90.6a±2.6 0.039
Hatched chick number 111.0ab±1.7 106.7b±1.6 123.0a±6.4 0.016
Hatching rate (%) 89.9±0.6 88.9±0.6 91.8±2.3 0.253
1-36 laying weeks
Total egg yield 213.0a±2.4 204.7b±2.2 205.2ab±9.0 0.034
Laying rate (%) 84.5a±0.9 81.2b±0.9 81.4ab±3.6 0.034
Total egg hatched 199.9a±2.3 192.4b±2.2 193.3a±8.8 0.047
Fertilized eggs 172.4a±1.9 165.0b±1.8 171.2ab±7.3 0.019
Fertilized rate (%) 86.6±0.5 86.2±0.5 88.6±2.0 0.447
Hatched chick number 150.3±1.8 145.1±1.6 151.5±6.7 0.056
Hatching rate (%) 87.4±0.5 88.1±0.5 90.2±2.0 0.298
1-48 laying weeks
Total egg yield 281.9a±2.8 267.3b±3.9 244.8b±15.0 0.007
Laying rate (%) 83.9a±1.4 79.6b±1.2 72.9b±4.5 0.007
Total egg hatched 272.9a±4.2 258.3b±3.9 235.8b±15.0 0.007
Fertilized eggs 234.9a±3.3 221.0b±3.2 207.6ab±11.9 0.003
Fertilized rate (%) 86.7±0.5 86.1±0.5 88.5±1.8 0.373
Hatched chick number 203.5a±2.8 193.1b±2.6 187.0ab±9.9 0.014
Hatching rate (%) 86.9±0.5 87.8±0.5 90.1±1.9 0.174
a,b,c Values within a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)
At the polymorphic site of the MTRN-1C gene, when the yield was counted in 12 weeks or until 24
the effects of the genotype were found in egg production weeks of laying (P<0.01), but in the later stage, the
1561
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
difference was non-significant (Table 2). Superior egg similar, with the exception of yolk index, in which the
yield was found in quails of AA genotype while those of highest was presented in DD genotype quails (P<0.05).
in TT genotyped quails were inferior (153.4 vs. 144.6 In the first 6 months of laying, many egg quality
eggs/24 laying weeks, respectively). A similar trend was characteristics were associated with the MTRN-1C
also found in several fertilized eggs and hatched chicks. polymorphism, especially egg weight and other traits
In Table 3, egg quality is presented for different related to yolk and albumen (Table 4). The genotype CC
laying periods (1-24 weeks and 25-48 weeks). Among the showed lower egg weight than both CT and TT
external and internal egg traits, albumen weight and genotypes, which was also observed for the yolk index.
albumen ratio were found to differ (P<0.01) in the first 6 Another internal trait, HU was the highest in birds with
months of laying, with the highest values being in quails TT genotype. However, in the later stage, only yolk ratio
of II genotype (6.6 g and 54.3%, respectively). In the was affected by genotype (P<0.05).
later stage (25-48 weeks), most of the parameters were
Table 2. Association between MTNR-1C polymorphism with egg production for extended laying periods.
Genotypes
Parameters P
AA (n=40) AC (n=64) AT (n=101) CC (n=25) CT (n=80) TT (n=64)
1-12 laying weeks
Total egg yield 72.4ab±0.6 72.7a±0.7 67.6c±1.4 71.4abc±1.0 71.6abc±0.7 70.1bc±0.6 0.002
Laying rate (%) 86.2 ±0.8
ab
86.5 ±0.8
a
80.4 ±1.7
c
85.0abc±1.1 85.2abc±0.9 83.4bc±0.7 0.002
Total eggs hatched 68.6 ±0.6
ab
68.8 ±0.7
a
63.8 ±1.4
c
67.6abc±0.9 67.7abc±0.7 66.3bc±0.6 0.002
Fertilized eggs 58.8±0.8 57.6±0.9 55.1±1.8 57.7±1.2 57.3±0.9 57.1±0.7 0.439
Fertilized rate (%) 85.8±0.8 83.6±0.9 86.3±1.8 85.3±1.2 84.6±1.0 86.0±0.7 0.342
Hatched chick number 54.6±0.9 52.7±1.0 51.0±2.0 53.1±1.4 52.5±1.0 52.7±0.8 0.477
Hatching rate (%) 92.6±0.7 91.0±0.7 92.4±1.5 91.9±1.0 91.5±0.7 92.0±0.6 0.661
1-24 laying weeks
Total egg yield 153.4a±1.3 148.9ab±1.5 153.9a±2.8 149.7ab±2.1 149.3ab±1.5 144.6b±1.2 0.000
Laying rate (%) 91.3a±0.8 88.7ab±0.9 91.6a±1.7 89.1ab±1.3 88.9ab±0.9 86.1b±0.7 0.000
Total eggs hatched 144.9 ±1.3 140.6 ±1.5 145.4 ±2.7 141.4 ±2.1 140.9ab±1.5
a ab a ab
136.3b±1.2 0.000
Fertilized eggs 126.1a±1.9 118.4ab±2.1 127.1ab±3.9 119.6ab±2.9 121.8ab±2.1 118.6b±1.7 0.019
Fertilized rate (%) 87.0±1.0 84.0±1.1 87.4±2.0 84.5±1.5 86.2±1.1 86.9±0.8 0.211
Hatched chick number 114.8±2.4 105.7±2.7 117.6±5.1 106.0±3.8 109.6±2.7 107.4±2.1 0.052
Hatching rate (%) 90.5±0.9 87.9±1.0 92.1±1.9 87.7±1.4 89.3±1.0 90.0±0.8 0.196
1-36 laying weeks
Total egg yield 210.6±3.6 205.0±3.8 208.4±7.0 214.9±5.5 206.5±4.0 206.6±3.2 0.686
Laying rate (%) 83.6±1.4 81.3±1.5 82.7±2.8 85.3±2.2 82.0±1.6 82.0±1.3 0.686
Total eggs hatched 199.0±3.6 193.5±3.9 196.9±7.1 203.5±5.5 194.9±4.0 195.4±3.2 0.705
Fertilized eggs 172.8±3.0 164.8±3.2 173.3±5.9 172.7±4.6 167.5±3.4 168.1±2.7 0.445
Fertilized rate (%) 87.3±0.8 85.7±0.8 88.2±1.5 85.2±1.2 86.4±0.9 86.1±0.7 0.456
Hatched chick number 153.5±2.7 146.2±2.9 152.7±5.3 150.8±4.1 147.7±3.0 147.3±2.4 0.405
Hatching rate (%) 89.1±0.7 89.0±0.8 88.5±1.5 87.3±1.1 88.3±0.8 87.8±0.7 0.065
1-48 laying weeks
Total egg yield 266.0±6.4 264.9±6.8 246.1±14.8 268.3±9.4 265.2±7.1 270.3±5.7 0.783
Laying rate (%) 79.2±1.9 78.9±2.0 73.3±4.4 79.9±2.8 78.9±2.1 80.5±1.7 0.783
Total eggs hatched 250.6±6.3 249.6±6.8 230.7±14.7 253.0±9.4 249.6±7.1 254.6±5.7 0.784
Fertilized eggs 261.8±5.1 213.2±5.4 204.3±11.8 214.9±7.5 213.4±5.6 218.3±4.5 0.892
Fertilized rate (%) 87.3±0.7 86.1±0.8 85.3±1.7 85.6±1.1 86.3±0.8 86.0±0.7 0.555
Hatched chick number 191.6±4.1 188.0±4.4 183.6±9.5 187.3±6.0 186.3±4.6 190.2±3.7 0.936
Hatching rate (%) 89.0±0.8 88.7±0.8 90.0±1.7 87.5±1.1 87.8±0.8 87.5±0.7 0.494
a,b,c
Values within a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)
1562
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
Genotype
Parameters P
II ID DD
1-24 laying weeks
Total eggs checked 1.068 1.218 108
Shape index 76.3±0.3 75.9±0.2 76.3±1.3 0.682
Egg weight (g) 12.2±0.1 12.0±0.1 12.2±0.3 0.240
Egg shell weight (g) 1.6±0.01 1.6±0.01 1.5±0.01 0.291
Albumen weight (g) 6.6a±0.1 6.3b±0.1 5.1c±0.4 0.000
Albumen height (mm) 4.1±0.03 4.1±0.02 4.1±0.1 0.554
Albumen width (mm) 41.2±0.8 44.6±0.7 45.9±3.3 0.842
Yolk weight (g) 3.9±0.02 3.8±0.02 3.8±0.1 0.156
Yolk height (mm) 11.0±0.1 10.9±0.03 11.1±0.2 0.081
Yolk width (mm) 23.4±0.2 23.4±0.1 23.6±0.7 0.953
Egg shell ratio (%) 12.9±0.1 12.9±0.1 12.3±0.4 0.347
Albumen ratio (%) 54.3a±0.7 52.1b±0.6 41.9c±3.0 0.000
Albumen index 9.5±0.1 9.5±0.1 9.1±0.5 0.780
Yolk ratio (%) 31.6±0.1 31.4±0.1 31.5±0.6 0.595
Yolk index 48.0±0.6 47.3±0.2 47.2±2.6 0.687
Haugh unit 87.0±0.2 86.9±0.1 86.9±0.7 0.849
25-48 laying weeks
Total eggs checked 1068 1218 108
Shape index 76.3±0.3 75.9±0.3 75.2±1.2 0.548
Egg weight (g) 11.8±0.1 11.8±0.1 11.7±0.3 0.831
Egg shell weight (g) 1.6±0.01 1.6±0.01 1.4±0.1 0.097
Albumen weight (g) 6.6±0.1 6.6±0.1 6.5±0.2 0.929
Albumen height (mm) 4.4±0.03 4.4±0.03 4.3±0.1 0.268
Albumen width (mm) 42.9±0.4 42.3±0.4 42.2±1.8 0.585
Yolk weight (g) 3.7±0.03 3.7±0.03 3.8±0.1 0.364
Yolk height (mm) 10.8±0.1 10.9±0.1 11.2±0.5 0.494
Yolk width (mm) 26.5±1.3 23.2±1.1 22.9±5.4 0.148
Egg shell ratio (%) 13.2±0.1 13.3±0.1 13.3±0.5 0.115
Albumen ratio (%) 55.3±0.2 55.6±0.2 54.9±1.0 0.677
Albumen index 10.4±0.2 10.7±0.1 10.4±0.6 0.287
Yolk ratio (%) 31.4±0.2 31.1±0.2 32.8±0.8 0.084
Yolk index 45.8b±0.4 46.7b±0.3 49.1a±1.2 0.033
Haugh unit 88.6±0.2 89.0±0.2 88.2±0.8 0.264
a,b,c Values within a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)
Genotypes
Parameters P
AA AC AT CC CT TT
1-24 laying weeks
Total eggs checked 486 120 384 216 612 426
Shape index (%) 76.7±0.5 75.9±0.6 75.7±1.1 76.4±0.8 75.9±0.6 75.6±0.5 0.727
Egg weight (g) 12.2ab±0.1 12.0ab±0.1 12.2ab±0.2 11.7b±0.1 12.3a±0.1 12.2a±0.1 0.025
Egg shell weight (g) 1.6±0.02 1.5±0.02 1.6±0.03 1.5±0.02 1.6±0.02 1.6±0.02 0.485
Albumen weight (g) 6.3±0.1 6.1±0.1 6.8±0.3 6.1±0.2 6.5±0.2 6.5±0.1 0.066
Albumen height (mm) 4.0b±0.04 4.2ab±0.04 4.1ab±0.01 4.1ab±0.1 4.1ab±0.04 4.2a±0.03 0.005
Albumen width (mm) 44.6±1.1 42.9±1.2 45.3±2.2 42.6±1.2 45.2±1.3 45.5±0.9 0.388
Yolk weight (g) 3.9±0.04 3.7±0.04 3.8±0.1 3.8±0.1 3.8±0.1 3.8±0.03 0.085
Yolk height (mm) 11.0abc±0.1 11.1a±0.1 11.1abc±0.1 10.7c±0.1 10.8bc±0.1 11.0ab±0.1 0.002
Yolk width (mm) 23.8a±0.3 23.6ab±0.3 23.6ab±0.5 24.0a±0.3 22.5b±0.3 23.2ab±0.2 0.003
Egg shell ratio (%) 12.8±0.1 12.9±0.1 12.8±0.3 13.1±0.2 12.7±0.2 13.0±0.1 0.525
1563
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
Albumen ratio (%) 52.1±1.1 51.6±1.1 56.3±2.1 51.9±1.4 53.3±1.2 52.8±0.9 0.429
Albumen index (%) 9.1ab±0.2 9.8a±0.2 9.1ab±0.3 9.6ab±0.2 9.1b±0.2 9.6ab±0.1 0.013
Yolk ratio (%) 31.9ab±0.2 31.1c±0.2 30.8bc±0.4 32.3a±0.3 30.7c±0.2 31.4bc±0.2 0.000
Yolk index 46.3ab±0.9 48.6ab±0.9 47.2 ±1.7
ab
44.8b±1.1 49.7a±1.0 47.9ab±0.7 0.015
Haugh unit 86.3b±0.2 87.3a±0.2 86.9ab±0.4 86.9ab±0.3 86.5ab±0.3 87.3a±0.2 0.004
25-48 laying weeks
Total eggs checked 486 120 384 216 612 426
Shape index (%) 11.8±0.1 11.8±0.1 11.8±0.2 11.5±0.1 11.9±0.1 11.8±0.1 0.254
Egg weight (g) 11.8±0.1 11.9±0.1 11.9±0.2 11.5±0.1 12.0±0.1 11.9±0.1 0.198
Egg shell weight (g) 1.5±0.02 1.6±0.02 1.6±0.04 1.5±0.03 1.6±0.02 1.6±0.02 0.351
Albumen weight (g) 6.5ab±0.1 6.6ab±0.1 6.6ab±0.1 6.3b±0.1 6.7a±0.1 6.6ab±0.1 0.044
Albumen height (mm) 4.4±0.1 4.4±0.1 4.5±0.1 4.4±0.1 4.3±0.1 4.4±0.04 0.145
Albumen width (mm) 42.4±0.6 42.6±0.6 44.0±1.2 41.8±0.8 43.3±0.7 42.5±0.5 0.654
Yolk weight (g) 3.7±0.04 3.7±0.04 3.7±0.09 3.7±0.06 3.7±0.07 3.7±0.04 0.697
Yolk height (mm) 10.7±0.2 11.2±0.2 10.8±0.3 10.7±0.2 10.8±0.2 10.7±0.1 0.249
Yolk width (mm) 28.9±1.8 23.5±1.9 23.7±3.6 23.2±2.4 23.6±2.1 23.4±1.5 0.205
Egg shell ratio (%) 13.1±0.2 13.4±0.4 13.0±0.3 13.3±0.2 13.2±0.2 13.2±0.1 0.797
Albumen ratio (%) 55.3±0.3 55.8±0.3 55.9±0.6 54.8±0.4 56.3±0.4 55.4±0.3 0.161
Albumen index (%) 10.6±0.2 10.6±0.2 10.4±0.4 10.7±0.3 10.2±0.3 10.5±0.2 0.687
Yolk ratio (%) 31.6ab±0.3 30.8ab±0.3 31.1ab±0.5 31.9a±0.3 30.5b±0.3 31.4ab±0.2 0.015
Yolk index 45.1±0.7 47.5±0.8 45.9±1.4 46.2±1.0 46.6±0.8 46.1±0.6 0.345
Haugh unit 89.1±0.3 89.0±0.3 89.6±0.6 89.1±0.4 88.0±0.3 88.7±0.2 0.081
a,b,c Values within a row with different superscripts are significantly different (P<0.05)
1564
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
rapidly. However, in this study, there were only 15 there are differences between quails that carry different
individuals with genotypes DD out of a total of 396 genotypes, no genotype really stands out in egg quality.
individuals, so it is not possible to have a precise Quails carrying AA genotype gave an average egg mass
conclusion about the benefits and disadvantages of this compared with those with other genotypes, and there is
genotype. Meanwhile, II genotype resulted in relatively no difference in other indicators related to albumen and
stable egg production and a slow reduction in laying rate. yolk. However, this is a homogeneous genotype for high
Therefore, when considering the effectiveness of quails yield, so it should be noted for breeding purposes.
up to 48 weeks of laying, this would be the best choice in
Conclusion: Altogether, it can be concluded that the two
terms of productivity and flock development.
polymorphisms studied may be used in breeding
In the present study, a novel polymorphic site
programs to improve egg production, and to some extent,
was detected in MTNR-1C gene and it was found to
egg quality traits in Japanese quails, of which the II
associate with egg yield and some egg quality traits.
genotype in PRL gene and the homozygous AA genotype
According to Sundaresan et al. (2009), the MTNR-1C
in MTNR-1C genes are appropriate for selection.
gene is highly expressed in the follicular granulocytes;
thus, it is thought to play an important role in egg Acknowledgments: This research was funded by the
formation, thereby affecting poultry egg production. The Vietnam National Foundation for Science and
study by Li et al. (2015) showed that the expression of Technology Development (NAFOSTED) under grant
the MTNR-1C gene was related to chicken egg number 106-NN.05-2013.12.
production, and the authors demonstrated that chickens
with a high expression of MTNR-1C had the lowest REFERENCES
number of eggs laid and vice versa. This was in line with
the report of Abd El Naby and Basha (2016) that the Abd El Naby, W.S.H. and H.A. Basha (2016). Expression
MTNR-1C expression increased, which accompanied a of melatonin receptor subtype genes and its
delay in sexual maturity of Japanese quails. In an impact on reproductive traits in Japanese Quail
association study, it was found that the MTNR-1C in different lighting systems. Avian Biol. Res.,
polymorphic gene is linked with the age at which the first 9(4), 250-256.
egg is laid and the number of eggs laid at 300 days of age Adachi, A., A.K. Natesan, M.G. Whitfield‐Rucker, S.E.
in Erlang mountain chickens (Li et al. 2013). Recently, Weigum and V.M. Cassone (2002). Functional
an association between MTNR-1C polymorphism with melatonin receptors and metabolic coupling in
total egg yield at 34 weeks of age, and age at first egg, cultured chick astrocytes. Glia, 39, 268-278.
was reported and the expression of this gene was up- Asuquo, B. and B. Okon (1993). Effects of age in lay and
regulated in an early-age maturation group of Shaoxing egg size on fertility and hatchability of chicken
duck (Feng et al. 2018). Although the exact role of eggs. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 59(1), 79-83.
melatonin receptors in different species during the Ayre, E., H. Yuan and S. Pang (1992). The identification
reproductive process is not well understood, MTNR-1C is of 125I-labelled iodomelatonin-binding sites in
hypothesized to activate avian sexual mature by down- the testes and ovaries of the chicken (Gallus
regulating its expression level (Feng et al. 2018). domesticus). J. Endocrinol., 133(1), 5-11.
Egg weight is an important indicator of egg Bagheri Sarvestani, A., A. Niazi, M. Zamiri and M.
quality and total egg production. If the total number of Dadpasand Taromsari (2013). Polymorphisms of
eggs is the same, but the egg weight varies, the entire egg prolactin gene in a native chicken population
production quality will be different. In quail breeding, and its association with egg production. Iranian
high-quality eggs are favored, especially those close to J. Vet. Res., 14(2), 113-119.
the average value, because these eggs give better Begli, H.E., S. Zerehdaran, S. Hassani, M.A. Abbasi, and
hatching probability than oversized or undersized eggs A.K. Ahmadi (2010). Polymorphism in prolactin
(Asuquo and Okon 1993). In addition, egg weight and PEPCK-C genes and its association with
corresponds to the weight of albumen, egg yolk and economic traits in native fowl of Yazd province.
eggshell. In Table 4, the genotypes at MTNR-1C Iranian J. Biotechnol., 8(3), 172-177.
polymorphism produced eggs with weights in the range Bello, N., O. Francino and A. Sánchez (2001). Isolation
of 11.7 to 12.2 g, in which quails of CC genotype had the of genomic DNA from feathers. J. Vet. Diagn.
lowest value. This result additionally implies that MTNR- Invest., 13, 162-164.
1C polymorphism has certain effects on the egg weight of Cui, J.-X., H.-L. Du, Y. Liang, X.-M. Deng, N. Li, and
Japanese quails. The effect is supposed to relate to gene X.-Q. Zhang (2006). Association of
expression since MTNR-1C is negatively associated with polymorphisms in the promoter region of
egg weight, individuals with low MTNR-1C expression chicken prolactin with egg production. Poult.
produce higher egg weight than those with high MTNR- Sci., 85, 26-31.
1C expression (Abd El Naby and Basha 2016). Although
1565
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
Deeb, N. and S. Lamont (2002). Genetic architecture of influence progesterone production. Fertil. Steril.,
growth and body composition in unique chicken 80(4), 1012-1016.
populations. J. Hered., 93, 107-118. Narinc, D., T. Aksoy, E. Karaman, A. Aygun, M.Z. Firat,
Feng, P., W. Zhao, Q. Xie, T. Zeng, L. Lu and L. Yang and M.K. Uslu (2013). Japanese quail meat
(2018). Polymorphisms of melatonin receptor quality: characteristics, heritabilities, and genetic
genes and their associations with egg production correlations with some slaughter traits. Poult.
traits in Shaoxing duck. Asian-Australas. J. Sci., 92(7), 1735-1744.
Anim. Sci., 31(10), 1535-1541. Nasr, M.A., M.S. El-Tarabany and M. J. Toscano (2016).
He, C., J. Wang, Z. Zhang, M. Yang, Y. Li, X. Tian, T. Effects of divergent selection for growth on egg
Ma, J. Tao, K. Zhu and Y. Song (2016). quality traits in Japanese quail. Anim. Prod. Sci.,
Mitochondria synthesize melatonin to ameliorate 56(11), 1797-1802.
its function and improve mice oocyte’s quality Rashidi, H., G. Rahimi-Mianji, A. Farhadi and M.
under in vitro conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 17(6), Gholizadeh (2012). Association of prolactin and
939. prolactin receptor gene polymorphisms with
Jiang, R., G. Xu, X. Zhang and N. Yang (2005). economic traits in breeder hens of indigenous
Association of polymorphisms for prolactin and chickens of Mazandaran province. Iranian J.
prolactin receptor genes with broody traits in Biotechnol., 10(2), 129-135.
chickens. Poult. Sci., 84, 839-845. Reddy, I. J., C.G. David, P. V. Sarma and K. Singh
Kulibaba, R. and A. Podstreshnyi (2012). Prolactin and (2002). The possible role of prolactin in laying
growth hormone gene polymorphisms in performance and steroid hormone secretion in
chicken lines of Ukrainian selection. Cytol. domestic hen (Gallus domesticus). Gen. Comp.
Genet., 46(6), 390-395. Endocrinol., 127(3), 249-255.
Li, D., N. Wu, J. Tu, Y. Hu, M. Yang, H. Yin, B. Chen, Reddy, I.J., C.G. David and S.S. Raju (2006). Chemical
H. Xu, Y. Yao and Q. Zhu (2015). Expression control of prolactin secretion and it’s effects on
patterns of melatonin receptors in chicken pause days, egg production and steroid hormone
ovarian follicles affected by monochromatic concentration in Girirani birds. Int. J. Poult. Sci.,
light. Genet. Mol. Res., 14(3), 10072-10080. 5(7), 685-692.
Li, D., L. Zhang, D. Smith, H. Xu, Y. Liu, X. Zhao, Y. Sari, M., S. Isik, K. Onk, M. Tilki, and T. Kırmizibayrak
Wang and Q. Zhu (2013). Genetic effects of (2012). Effects of layer age and different
melatonin receptor genes on chicken plumage colors on external and internal egg
reproductive traits. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 58, 58- quality characteristics in Japanese quails
64. (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Arch. Geflügelkd.,
Liang, Y., J. Cui, G. Yang, F.C. Leung and X. Zhang 76(4), S. 254-258.
(2006). Polymorphisms of 5′ flanking region of Sharp, P.J., M.C. Macnamee, R.T. Talbot, R.J. Sterling
chicken prolactin gene. Domest. Anim. and T.R. Hall (1984). Aspects of the
Endocrin., 30(1), 1-16. neuroendocrine control of ovulation and
Lotfi, E., S. Zerehdaran, M. Ahani, and E. Dehnavi broodiness in the domestic hen. J. Exp. Zool.,
(2013). Genetic polymorphism in Prolactin gene 232(3), 475-483.
and its association with reproductive traits in Shi, J.M., X.Z. Tian, G.B. Zhou, L. Wang, C. Gao, S.E.
Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). Zhu, S.M. Zeng, J.H. Tian and G.S. Liu (2009).
Poult. Sci. J., 1, 29-35. Melatonin exists in porcine follicular fluid and
Lumatauw, S. and M.A. Mu’in (2016). A 24-bp Indel improves in vitro maturation and
(Insertion-Deletion) polymorphism in promoter parthenogenetic development of porcine
prolactin gene of Papua local chickens. Anim. oocytes. J. Pineal. Res., 47(4), 318-323.
Prod., 18(1), 1-7. Shimada, K., H. Ishida, K. Sato, H. Seo, and N. Matsui
March, J., P. Sharp, P. Wilson and H.J.R. Sang (1994). (1991). Expression of prolactin gene in
Effect of active immunization against incubating hens. J. Reprod. Fertil., 91, 147-154.
recombinant-derived chicken prolactin fusion Shiue, Y.L., L.R. Chen, C.F. Chen, Y.L. Chen, J.P. Ju,
protein on the onset of broodiness and C.H. Chao and Y.P. Lee (2006). Identification of
photoinduced egg laying in bantam hens. J. transcripts related to high egg production in the
Reprod. Fertil. 101(1), 227-233. chicken hypothalamus and pituitary gland.
Minitab, 2010. Minitab reference manual, Release 16.2.1 Theriogenology, 66(5), 1274-1283.
for Windows (Minitab Inc, USA). Soares, J.M., M.I. Masana, Ç. Erşahin and M.L.
Nakamura, Y., H. Tamura, H. Takayama, and H. Kato Dubocovich (2003). Functional melatonin
(2003). Increased endogenous level of melatonin receptors in rat ovaries at various stages of the
in preovulatory human follicles does not directly
1566
Lan et al., The J. Anim. Plant Sci., 31 (6) 2021
estrous cycle. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 306(2), mechanistic approach. J. Pineal. Res., 57(3),
694-702. 239-247.
Sockman, K. W., H. Schwabl and P. J. Sharp (2000). The Untergrasser, A., I. Cutcutache, T. Koressaar, J. Ye, B.
role of prolactin in the regulation of clutch size Faircloth, M. Remm and S. Rozen (2012).
and onset of incubation behavior in the Primer3–new capabilities and interfaces.
American kestrel. Horm. Behav., 38(3), 168- Nucleic. Acids. Res., 40(15), e115.
176. Vu, C.T. and N.T. Ngu (2016). Single nucleotide
Sundaresan, N., M.M. Leo, J. Subramani, D. Anish, M. polymorphisms in candidate genes associated
Sudhagar, K. Ahmed, M. Saxena, J. Tyagi, K. with egg production traits in native Noi chicken
Sastry and V. Saxena (2009). Expression of Vietnam. Int. J. Pl. An. and Env. Sci., 6, 162-
analysis of melatonin receptor subtypes in the 169.
ovary of domestic chicken. Vet. Res. Commun., Yousefi, S., Z. Raoufi, Z. Rasouli and S. Zerehdaran
33(1), 49-56. (2012). Investigation of prolactin gene
Tian, X., F. Wang, C. He, L. Zhang, D. Tan, R.J. Reiter, polymorphism in Japanese quail. Anim. Sci.
J. Xu, P. Ji, and G. Liu (2014). Beneficial effects Biotechnol., 45(1), 289-292.
of melatonin on bovine oocytes maturation: a
1567