Diet Reproduction Chiasmocleis Hudsoni
Diet Reproduction Chiasmocleis Hudsoni
Diet Reproduction Chiasmocleis Hudsoni
Received: 23. May 2020 / Accepted: 04. March 2021 / Available online: 15. march 2021 / Printed: June 2021
Abstract. Chiasmocleis hudsoni is a small fossorial anuran widely distributed in the Amazon basin. Due to its fossorial habit and
explosive breeding pattern, individuals are rarely found, and data on the natural history of this species are scarce. Here we provide
data on the diet composition and reproductive aspects of C. hudsoni from eastern Brazilian Amazonia. We found 20 prey categories
within eight orders in the stomachs of 106 specimens of C. hudsoni. The index of relative importance showed that Formicidae (48.3%)
was the most represented prey category in the diet. Oocytes ranged from 202 to 297 per female (n = 4, mean = 250, SD = 67.2), with a
diameter varying from 0.9 to 1.3 mm (n = 4, mean = 1.1 mm, SD = 0.1 mm). Similar to other Chiasmocleis species, mites were a large
fraction of the diet of C. hudsoni in eastern Amazonia, which differs from most leaf-litter dwelling anurans that do not prey on large
amounts of mites. The explosive breeding pattern found in Microhylidae frogs is likely to be observed in C. hudsoni and the size
fecundity relationship may be related to the process of sexual size dimorphism observed.
Key words: natural history, oocytes, myrmecophagy, acariphagy, size-fecundity.
Meer 1986, Torres et al. 2020) suggesting that C. hudsoni ac- many times during the rainy season over short periods (Pra-
tively search on these preys. In addition, C. hudsoni con- do et al. 2005).
sumed mainly on Solenopsis and Pheidole ants which are Our analyses showed that female SVL was positively
known aggregate in enormous colonies that hold large correlated with clutch size. Female anuran fecundity appears
populations above and underneath the soil (Lofgren & to be related to a process of selection of larger females that
Vander Meer 1986, Hölldobler & Wilson 1990). This pattern could generate sharp sexual size dimorphism (Shine 1979),
of diet is generally classified as “ant specialist”, usually as- as seems to be the case for C. hudsoni since we found signifi-
signed to species such as Microhylidae frogs that consume cant differences between males and females SVL. On the
high amounts of ants and other chitinous slow-moving ar- other hand, the evolution of burrowing behavior and its role
thropods (Toft 1980, 1981). However, a very few studies es- on sexual dimorphism in fossorial anurans have been dis-
timate resource availability data to support a selective be- cussed recently, with reference to Leptodactyline frogs
havior on Chiasmocleis and other microhylid species (e. g. Di- (Ponssa & Barrionuevo 2012, Ponssa & Medina 2016). As
az-Perez et al. 2020). well as Leptodactyline frogs, some Microhylidae species also
Microhylid frogs are small fossorial and narrow-headed construct subterranean chambers to deposit their eggs and
frogs, leading to a limitation and a tendency to consume develop early larval stages (Nomura et al. 2009). Conse-
small and abundant leaf-litter prey. This was also observed quently, the burrowing behavior may be linked to the reduc-
in small species from generalist guilds studied in the same tion in male morphometry because in anurans, chambers to
region, which demonstrated a tendency toward consuming deposit foam nests are often constructed by males. However,
ants and mites in high proportions (Sanches et al. 2019, Cor- this question is still to be investigated in Microhylidae spe-
rêa et al. 2020), supporting that small ground-dwelling frogs cies since sexual dimorphism has been reported (Van Sluys
capitalize on ants and mites due to their abundance on the et al. 2006, Diaz-Perez et al. 2020, Nascimento et al. 2020).
leaf litter of tropical forests and due to their limitation in Natural history studies are unarguably a solid basis for
consuming larger preys that are more pleasant to ingest (Si- hypothesis-driven studies from different research fields. It
mon & Toft 1991). may be an important means by which we gather data on bio-
Despite resource availability was not investigated in C. logical aspects of rare and hard to detect species in the field,
hudsoni, descriptions of ants in refined taxonomic scales given that these species are often understudied in long-term
demonstrated differences between our population of C. hud- ecological research. In addition, natural history studies com-
soni and that of central Amazon with regards to myrme- pile fundamental information to design and conduct long-
cophagy. Da Silva et al. (2019) reported ants of the genus term ecological research to provide a scientific basis for the
Crematogaster and Pheidole as the most important ants in the conservation of populations and species (Hampton &
diet of C. hudsoni from central Amazon, whereas C. hudsoni Wheeler 2012). Chiasmocleis species were poorly studied for a
from our population consumed mainly on Wasmannia and long time, probably due to the typical explosive breeding
Solenopsis ants. This difference of ants consumed in distinct pattern of some species leading to an unregular calling activ-
areas point out a non-selective behavior among types of ity through the seasons along with the semi-fossorial habits
ants, and possibly is an artifact of distinct ant assemblage be- of these frogs, making them hard to detect.
tween regions. Also, Chiasmocleis frogs seem to lack an alka-
loid sequestering system, a premise for selective behavior on
potential alkaloid-containing ants observed in Dendrobatids
Acknowledgement. The authors thank Fabio Hepp and two
and Bufonids (Mebs et al. 2010). In sum, we suggest that the
anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript. The
feeding behavior of C. hudsoni needs further investigation authors thank J.C. Sousa, and M.R. Dias-Souza for their help with the
before major statements, addressing food resource availabil- field work. M.M. Salviano-Santana and A.E. Oliveira-Souza received
ity to accurately test if ant-eating is due to resource availabil- a scholarship of the Programa Voluntário de Iniciação Científica
ity and morphological constraints related to the fossorial (PROVIC) of Universidade Federal do Amapá.
habits and small size of the species.
As observed in other studies on reproductive aspects of
frogs, we describe here the number of eggs based on the References
counting of mature eggs from the abdominal cavity of fe-
males, it substantially represents a coarse approximation of Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.L.M., Sparovek, G.
(2013): Köppen’s climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische
what would be the actual number of eggs deposited. The
Zeitschrift 22: 711-728.
number of oocytes counted for C. hudsoni is somewhat simi- Araújo, M.S., Bolnick, D.I., Martinelli, L.A., Giaretta, A.A., Reis, S.F. (2009):
lar to the number of deposited eggs reported for C. lacrimae Individual-level diet variation in four species of Brazilian frogs. Journal of
Animal Ecology 78: 848-856.
(245 eggs; Cordioli et al. 2019) and C. leucosticta (202 eggs,
Baccaro, F.B., Feitosa, R.M., Fernandez, F., Fernandes, I.O., Izzo, T.J., Souza,
Haddad & Hödl 1997; 212 oocytes, Lopes et al. 2017), but J.L.P., Solar, R. (2015): Guia para os gêneros de formigas do Brasil. Editora
quite different from the number of eggs deposited by a pop- INPA, Manaus, Amazonas.
ulation of C. hudsoni at central Amazonia (351 eggs, Ro- Berazategui, M., Camargo, A., Maneyro, R. (2007): Environmental and seasonal
variation in the diet of Elachistocleis bicolor (Guérin-Méneville 1838) (Anura:
drigues et al. 2008). Anurans from tropical forests can lay Microhylidae) from northern Uruguay. Zoological Science 24(3): 225-231.
eggs in several reproductive events, which display a varia- Bland, L.M., Bielby, J., Kearney, S., Orme, C.D.L., Watson, J.E., Collen, B. (2017):
tion in the number of oocytes produced over the course of a Toward reassessing data‐deficient species. Conservation Biology 31(3): 531-
539.
reproductive season (Haddad & Prado 2005, Crump 2015). Carrillo, J.F.C., Galvão, C., Anjos, L.A., Santana, D.J. (2020): Diet of
This is particular evident in explosive breeders that breed Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura: Microhylidae) in a semideciduous forest in
western Brazil. Cuadernos de Herpetología 34(2): 251-255.
Notes on diet and reproduction of Chiasmocleis hudsoni 95
Colli, G.R., Araújo, A.F.B., Da Silveira, R., Roma, F. (1992): Niche partitioning Nomura, F., Rossa-Feres, D.C., Langeani, F. (2009): Burrowing behavior of
and morphology of two syntopic Tropidurus (Sauria: Tropiduridae) in Mato Dermatonotus muelleri (Anura, Microhylidae) with reference to the origin of
Grosso, Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 26: 66-69. the burrowing behavior of Anura. Journal of Ethology 27(1): 195-201.
Cordioli, L.A., Matias, V.S., Carvalho-e-Silva, A.M.P.T. (2019): Ontogeny and Parker, H.W. (1940): Undescribed anatomical structures and new species of
reproductive aspects of Chiasmocleis lacrimae (Anura, Microhylidae, reptiles and amphibians. Journal of Natural History 5: 257-274.
Gastrophryninae) in an unspoiled Atlantic Forest area in the state of Rio de Peloso, P.L.V., Sturaro, M.J., Forlani, M.C., Gaucher, P., Motta, A.P., Wheeler,
Janeiro, Brazil. Herpetology Notes 12: 1037-1050. W.C. (2014): Phylogeny, taxonomic revision, and character evolution of the
Corrêa, J.G., França, P.F., Kawashita-Ribeiro, R.A., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2020): genera Chiasmocleis and Syncope (Anura, Microhylidae) in Amazonia, with
Natural history notes of Sphaenorhynchus carneus (Anura, Hylidae) in the descriptions of three new species. Bulletin of the American Museum of
eastern Brazilian Amazon. Herpetology Notes 13: 613-620. Natural History 2014: 1-112.
Costa-Campos, C.E., Sousa, J.C., Menin, M. (2019): Chiasmocleis hudsoni Parker, Pianka, E.R. (1986): Ecology and natural history of desert lizards - analysis of
1940 (Anura, Microhylidae): a new record for Amapá State, Brazil. the ecological niche and community structure. Princeton University Press,
Herpetology Notes 12: 405-408. New Jersey, USA.
Crump, M. (2015): Anuran Reproductive Modes: Evolving Perspectives. Journal Pinkas, L., Oliphant, M.S., Iverson, I.L.K. (1971): Food habits of albacore, bluefin
of Herpetology 49: 1-16. tuna, and bonito in Californian waters. Fish Bulletin 152: 1-105.
Da Silva, I.B., Dos Santos, T.F., Frazão, L., Marques-Souza, S., Da Silva, L.A., Ponssa, M.L., Barrionuevo, J.S. (2012): Sexual dimorphism in Leptodactylus
Menin, M. (2019): The diet of Chiasmocleis hudsoni and C. shudikarensis latinasus (Anura, Leptodactylidae): nasal capsule anatomy, morphometric
(Anura, Microhylidae) of terra firme forests in the Brazilian Amazonia. characters and performance associated with burrowing behavior. Acta
Herpetology Notes 12: 655-659. Zoologica 93(1): 57-67.
Diaz-Perez, J.A., Sugai, J.L.M.M., Ceron, K., Moroti, M.T., Santana, D.J. (2020): Ponssa, M.L., Medina, R.G. (2016): Comparative morphometrics in
Dietary selectivity and sexual size dimorphism of Chiasmocleis mehelyi Leptodactyline frogs (Anura, Leptodactylidae, Leptodactylinae): Does
(Anura: Microhylidae) in a Cerrado area of SW Brazil. North-Western burrowing behavior relate to sexual dimorphism? Journal of Herpetology
Journal of Zoology 16(2): 166-171. 50(4): 604-615.
Forti, L.R., Tissiani, A.S.O., Mott, T., Strüssmann, C. (2011): Diet of Ameerega Prado, C.P.A., Uetanabaro, M., Haddad, C.F.B. (2005): Breeding activity
braccata (Steindachner, 1864) (Anura: Dendrobatidae) from Chapada dos patterns, reproductive modes, and habitat use by anurans (Amphibia) in a
Guimarães and Cuiabá, Mato Grosso State, Brazil. Brazilian Journal of seasonal environment in the Pantanal, Brazil. Amphibia-Reptilia 26(2): 211-
Biology 71(1): 189-196. 221.
Fowler, H.G. (1993): Relative representation of Pheidole (Hymenoptera: R Development Core Team. (2015): R: A language and environment for
Formicidae) in local ground ant assemblages of the Americas. Anales de statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
Biología 19: 29-37. Austria.
Frost, D.R. (2020): Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Rafael, J.A., Melo, G., Carvalho, C., Casari, C.A., Constantino, R. (2012): Insetos
Version 6.0. American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA. do Brasil: Diversidade e Taxonomia. Holos Editora, Ribeirão Preto, SP.
<http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.html>, accessed Rodrigues, D.J., Menin, M., Lima, A.P., Mokross, K.S. (2008): Tadpole and
on 2020.02.26. vocalizations of Chiasmocleis hudsoni (Anura, Microhylidae) in Central
Haddad, C.F.B., Hödl, W. (1997): A new reproductive mode in anurans: bubble Amazonia, Brazil. Zootaxa 1680: 55-58.
nest in Chiasmocleis leucosticta (Anura, Microhylidae). Copeia 1997: 585-588. Sanches, P.R., Santos, F.P., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2019): Diet of the napo tropical
Haddad, C.F.B., Prado, C.P.A. (2005): Reproductive modes in frogs and their bullfrog Adenomera hylaedactyla (Cope, 1868) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from
unexpected diversity in the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. BioScience 55(3): 207- an urban area in southern Amapá, eastern Amazon. Herpetology Notes 12:
217. 841-845.
Hampton, S.E., Wheeler, T.A. (2012): Fostering the rebirth of natural history. Shine, R. (1979): Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism in the Amphibia.
Biology Letters 8: 161-163. Copeia 1979: 297-306.
Heyer, W.R., Donnelly, M.A., Mcdiarmid, R.W., Hayek, L.A.C., Foster, M.S. Silva e Silva, Y.B., Costa-Campos, C.E. (2018): Anuran species composition of
(1994): Measuring and monitoring biological diversity: standard methods for Cancão Municipal Natural Park, municipality of Serra do Navio, Amapá
amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London. state, Brazil. Zookeys 762: 131-148.
Hödl, W. (1997): Reproductive diversity in Amazonian lowland frogs. Simon, M.P., Toft, C.A. (1991): Diet specialization in small vertebrates: mite
Fortschritte der Zoologie 38: 41-60. eating in frogs. Oikos 61: 263-278.
Hölldobler, B., Wilson E.O. (1990): The ants. Harvard University Press, Solé, M., Ketterl, J., Di-Bernardo, M., Kwet, A. (2002): Ants and termites are the
Cambridge, UK. diet of the microhylid frog Elachistocleis ovalis (Schneider, 1799) at an
Hurlbert, S.H. (1978): The measurement of niche overlap and some relatives. Araucaria forest in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Herpetological Bulletin 79: 14-
Ecology 59: 67-77. 17.
Levings, S.C., Franks, N.R. (1982). Patterns of nest dispersion in a tropical Toft, C.A. (1980): Feeding ecology of thirteen syntopic species of anurans in a
ground ant community. Ecology 63: 338-344. seasonal tropical environment. Oecologia 45:131-141.
Lima, A.P., Magnusson, W.E., Menin, M., Erdtmann, L.K., Rodrigues, D.J., Toft, C.A. (1981): Feeding ecology of Panamanian litter anurans: patterns in diet
Keller, C., Hödl, W. (2006): Guia de sapos da Reserva Adolpho Ducke, and foraging mode. Journal of Herpetology 15: 139-144.
Amazônia Central. Atemma, Manaus. Torres, M.T., Souza, J.L.P., Baccaro, F.B. (2020): Distribution of epigeic and
Lofgren, C.S., Vander Meer, R.K. (1986): Fire Ants and Leaf-Cutting Ants. hypogeic ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in ombrophilous forests in the
Westview, Boulder/London. Brazilian Amazon. Sociobiology 67(2): 186-200.
Lopes, M.S., Bovendorp, R.S., Moraes, G.J.D., Percequillo, A.R., Bertoluci, J. Leary, S., Underwood, W., Anthony, R., Cartner, S. (2013): AVMA Guidelines
(2017): Diversity of ants and mites in the diet of the Brazilian frog for the Euthanasia of Animals. American Veterinary Medical Association,
Chiasmocleis leucosticta (Anura: Microhylidae). Biota Neotropica 17(3): Schaumburg, IL, USA.
e20170323. Van Sluys, M., Schittini, G.M., Marra, R.V., Azevedo, A.R.M., Vicente, J.J.,
Mebs, D., Jansen, M., Köhler, G., Pogoda, W., Kauert, G. (2010): Myrmecophagy Vrcibradic, D. (2006): Body size, diet and endoparasites of the microhylid
and alkaloid sequestration in amphibians: a study on Ameerega picta frog Chiasmocleis capixaba in an Atlantic Forest area of Southern Bahia state,
(Dendrobatidae) and Elachistocleis sp. (Microhylidae) frogs. Salamandra Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 66: 167-173.
46(1): 11-15. Wells, K.D. (2007): The ecology and behavior of amphibians. University of
Nascimento, F.A.C.D., Vilela, B., Matias Dubeux, M.J., Galdino, J.Y.A., Araújo- Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
Neto, J.V., Leal, F., Sá, R. (2020): Reproductive biology and sexual
dimorphism of the poorly known frog Chiasmocleis alagoana (Microhylidae,
Gastrophryninae), with an updated diagnosis for the species. Studies on
Neotropical Fauna and Environment 55: 1-15.