Vena Jones Cox The Guru Manifesto

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 21

The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.

95

The Guru
Manifesto:
How to Avoid Real Estate Education Ripoffs and
Learn What You Need to Know to Make Millions in the
Most Proven Investment in America Today

Copyright 2019
Vena Jones-Cox

Warning: This report contains graphic descriptions of the


ways in which you’ve probably been ripped off by the real
estate education industry and some mildly coarse
language. Enter with care.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

Who I Am and Why I Have Any Right to Be Saying This Stuff


My name is Vena Jones-Cox, and I’m a real estate investor.

I know, I know, it sounds like the opening to a Real Estate Investor’s Anonymous
meeting. And I admit, I AM addicted to real estate: for 2 decades, it’s allowed me to live well,
control my own time, work from home, and indulge in a very expensive travel habit.

And there’s absolutely no question in my mind that real estate education—those


seminars, homestudy courses, and bootcamps about which I’ll be commenting in this special
report—have been a big key to my success. In fact, they’re a big key to the success of EVERY
wealthy real estate investor, including you.

Your path from “wannabe” to property mogul will be greatly eased when you invest the
time and money it takes to learn from people who’ve already walked the path; who’ve made the
expensive mistakes and developed the techniques for finding, negotiating, financing, and making
money from deals; who have the ability and commitment to teach you to do the same.

And therein lies the conundrum. Just because a particular “guru” declares himself to be
an expert, and writes a course, and dares to sell it for $2,500, doesn’t make him someone that
you should invest with, depend on, or follow.

There has, in fact, been a veritable explosion of self-proclaimed experts selling


expensive (and largely useless) education to aspiring investors in the past 5 years. Some of
these people have literally never done a real estate deal in their lives (one is a radio talk show
host who admitted to a friend of mine that he had only bought one property—his own home—
and created his “course” based on research he’d done on the internet); others have the expertise
but are just awful at conveying it; still others are teaching investing strategies that border on the
illegal and have long since crossed the line into the unethical.

So why do these people—the inexperienced, the incompetent, and the downright


wrong—hit the road (or the web) and make a career of selling “information products” about an
industry they don’t really understand or care about?

Because, not to put too fine a point on it, they don’t care about YOUR pocketbook or
success—they only care about their own. It’s sad. In fact, I’d go so far as to say it’s scummy. But
it’s also true. In my humble opinion, they’d build a stronger following of people more able to
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

afford the next course, and the next, and the next, if they’d actually bother to give good
information that you could use to make some money in real estate…but maybe that’s just me.

For a skilled salesperson, there’s a LOT of money to be made selling real estate education
I’m talking millions of dollars a year. I’m talking private jet, private island money. And, in the
excitement that the audience feels following the “get right quick” pitch, it doesn’t really matter
whether what’s being sold is good, bad, or indifferent. Slick pitches sell. Period.

And let me say for the first of many times—some of them deserve what they earn. A guru
who actually delivers on his promise of workable, quality education that puts you in the driver’s
seat of your own life SHOULD be financially rewarded for financially rewarding others.

Unfortunately, it tends to be the case that the experts with the most knowledge are the
least willing to say stuff that causes you to whip out your credit card and ring up a 4- or 5-figure
charge for the latest and greatest training.

Those of us who actually KNOW the real estate business choke on phrases like, “get rich
quick” and “no work required” and “done for you”—because we know that, like any business,
real estate investing IS work (albeit highly rewarded, as measured in both money and
satisfaction). We can’t tell you that our courses will do what needs to be done “for” you (no one
can, and not be a bald-faced liar). And, unfortunately, it’s that kind of “so easy you can do it in
your sleep” pitch that most appeals to people that have no frame of reference for what the real
estate investment—and education—world is really all about.

My purpose with this e-book is to give you that frame of reference that will let you
invest in education wisely, whether it’s with me or with one of the dozens of really good,
really experienced gurus out there. More importantly, it’s to help you avoid the hundreds
more who will take your money and leave you no more able to do smart, profitable deals than
you were BEFORE you maxed out your credit cards buying their “education”.

And why am I more qualified to do this than your average investor/educator?

First of all, because I’m willing to speak up. I’ve had the conversation about the “bad
guys” with a score of the “good guys” (and gals) dozens of times—but most of them are
unwilling to break the unspoken agreement in the real estate education industry that says, “never
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

speak ill of your fellow instructors, because it hurts us all”. (Don’t believe this agreement exists?
Next time you sit in on a panel discussion between gurus, ask the question, “Which of the other
presenter’s courses would you NOT buy, because you don’t think it’s workable or complete or
well-written?” The answer from everyone on the panel will invariably be, “There are NONE I
wouldn’t buy, because they’re all great, and you should get them all, especially mine!”)

Secondly, I have unique access to both the gurus and their products. I promote several
large “multi-speaker” events each year, and I review each and every course from each and every
guru who wants to present at them. As a result, I read, listen to, or attend somewhere in the
neighborhood of 2 dozen courses annually. I have also hosted a real estate investing radio show
for more than 12 years (you can listen to it at 5 p.m. EST on Wednesdays at
www.WMKVFM.org or download archived shows or subscribe to the podcast at
www.REGoddess.com) , and interviewed hundreds of local, regional, and national experts
on the air.

With 20 year’s experience, I have a keen eye for B.S., for vagueness, for incomplete
strategy, for borderline-illegal information, and for “education” that was clearly thrown together
to generate some income for the guru rather than carefully thought-out and presented for the
purpose of generating income for you.

Finally—and you have no idea how incredibly immodest it feels to me to say this about
myself—I actually care about the real estate investment industry in general your success as a real
estate investor in specific.

Unlike many of the gurus out there, I have served literally thousands of hours in
volunteer positions for the purpose of advancing real estate education, working against anti-
investor legislation, and helping local non-profit real estate association grow and educate their
membership. I’ve served as president of Cincinnati REIA, Ohio REIA, and the National Real
Estate Investor’s Association—all unpaid, thankless, pain-in-the-butt positions—because I want
my business to be populated by wise, ethical, successful people who love real estate as much as I
do. Similarly, the above-mentioned radio show—which airs on non-commercial public radio—is
a labor of love that in no way helps me buy or sell houses or courses, and for which I am not
compensated.

So what I want you to get from this report is very simply a frame of reference that
will let you understand what the real estate education industry is all about. I’d like to help
you avoid being one of the millions of people who’ve been sucked in by the bad-guy gurus,
and give you a sense of how to recognize them. I’d like to give you a “radar” that will let
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

you weed out the empty promises and, instead, become one of the millions of Americans,
like me, who’ve taken advantage of some of the great education out there to become
financially independent through real estate investing.

Happy Investing!

Vena
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

A Brief History of Real Estate Education1


Something really interesting has happened to the real estate education industry over the
past three decades.

If you’re brand new to the whole real estate world, you may not have experienced what
I’m about to tell you, and I hope that this e-book gives you, among other things, the ability to
critically examine the courses and seminars available to you and choose them wisely.

Unfortunately, you may have already been a victim of the system I’m going to describe.
In this case, try to put it behind you, and know that when you’re finished reading this, you’ll be a
wiser consumer who won’t fall prey to the charlatans you’ve been dealing with up until now.

So here’s the thing: prior to the 1970s, the way we learned about real estate investing was
by doing it. Yes, there were books available on the topic—the most famous being Bill
Nickerson’s iconic How I Turned $1,000 into $1 Million in Real Estate in My Spare Time—but
beyond such “on the bookshelves” guides, we were pretty much left to sink or swim by
ourselves. There was no such thing as a live course or even a real estate association for support
or more detailed information, and colleges did not teach residential real estate investing classes
the way they often do now.

In the late 60s and early 70s, a new form of education appeared: the multi-day seminar.
Pioneered by Al Lowry (using Bill Nickerson’s materials) and Robert Allen among a host of
lesser-known names, these traveling shows were sold via full-page newspaper ads and held in
hotel rooms in cities across the U.S.

Much more detailed and interactive than a mere book, these seminars became incredibly
popular. And given that interest rates on home loans at the time were in the double digits, the
instruction about creative buying filled a need that was not being met in other ways. As a result,
these classes often drew 300-400 students at $499 each—and remember, that was in 1980
dollars!

This trend spawned two others—first, real estate investment associations, made up of
graduates of the traveling seminars, popped up all over the country. These associations
(variously called REIAs, property owners associations, landlord association, and so on) provided
a forum in which people who were actively pursuing real estate as an investment could meet,
network, negotiate group discounts on products and services, secure local experts to discuss
topics like how to navigate the local courthouse, and so on. In the 70’s and 80’s most

1
This is background information; if you’re looking for the rabid rant, you can skip down a few pages.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

associations were non-profits run by volunteers, which added to their credibility2, as the directors
made no money personally from the education promoted at the meeting.

The second trend, of course, was the explosion of local, regional, and national seminars
of varying content and quality. Suddenly, instead of a handful of instructors and events, there
were dozens, all claiming to have the best, most detailed information.

There are two things that are important to understand about this era—which lasted until
the early 90’s—versus the real estate education world of today.

First, there was an assumption by both the students and the instructors that the
education being delivered would be detailed enough to allow the attendee to actually buy
and profit from real estate, without additional expenditure on courses, seminars, mentoring and
coaching programs, and so on.3 The classes tended to be general in that they taught the important
basic skills of appraisal, negotiation, finance, management, and disposition of property—in other
words, skills that every investor needs to buy every kind of property in every part of the country
in every upturn and downturn.

Yes, other, more narrowly-focused courses were also available at the time—classes
specifically designed to discuss owner financing, or tax savings, or rental management in more
detail than the intentionally-general beginner’s classes. But these seminars were NOT pitched to
newbies, because they were intended for the more experienced (or at least more educated)
investor. Nor were they the expensive “bootcamps” available today—they were modestly priced
and modestly attended.

Second, the REIA groups provided an important safety net to keep their members from
investing in a course that was not worth the money (remember, $500 was a LOT more money in
1985 than it is today!). When a new course or instructor appeared on the market, REIA members
would simply go to a meeting, ask around, find someone who’d invested in the seminar, and get
an unbiased opinion of the value of the training. Any event that wasn’t honest, detailed, and
workable didn’t last long, because budding investors would quickly hear that the quality wasn’t
there, and stay away in droves.

So until the early 1990s, the typical arc of your real estate education would have looked
like this:

1. Attend a 2- or 3-day basic skills seminar.


2. Use the information gleaned there, plus the support of investors in your local

2
but sometimes led to chaos in the planning and execution of the meetings!
3
My own father, in fact, bought millions of dollars worth of real estate based primarily on the education he got from
the Lowry/Nickerson course in the early 80s.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

REIA organization, to make some offers, buy a property or two, and generally get
started.
3. Once actively in the market, choose other, more topic-focused events as needed to
sharpen your skills and grow your business.

A wise, inexpensive, and conservative way to “get rich slow” in real estate.

Then, in the Early 90s, Everything Started to Change…


In the 70s and 80s, a handful of “gurus” were making a lot of money delivering a
generally high quality of real-life education to serious investors who understood that some
expenditure on education was a whole lot cheaper than making expensive mistakes diving into a
business they—the students—didn’t fully understand.

And whenever there’s a whole lot of money being made, someone will figure out a way
to make some more4. That’s why the 90s saw an explosion in both the number and kind of real
estate seminars and “home study courses” (that’s the manual and audios you buy to learn at
home, with no live event attached) on the market.

This time period also ushered in a relatively new concept—the “dog and pony show.”
These events featured multiple speakers presenting for 1-2 hours with a “pitch” for the speaker’s
seminar or homestudy course at the end. Though very useful for vetting a large number of
potential speakers and topics in a short period of time, these events were not (and are not) strictly
“educational”—after all, how much real information can any expert deliver in 90 minutes?

Nonetheless, “dog and pony shows” were (and are) extremely popular amongst investors,
because of their low admission fees (usually less than $100), their networking opportunities, and
their ability to showcase many speakers and strategies in a short period of time.

They were also popular among speakers, because the promoter of the show took on the
risk and expense of marketing the events, renting the hotel space, and so on in return for half of
the sales of the speakers’ courses.

However, the success of these events had several downsides for speakers: instead of
keeping 100% of the profits from courses sold, the speakers kept just half—and still had to pay
for travel, course production, and cost of actually fulfilling the live event they’d just sold the
promoter’s audience.

What’s more, the “competitive environment” of the dog and pony show (some had up to
30 speakers selling product in a single long weekend) meant that people who were used to being

4
And don’t get me wrong, I’m all in favor of making money. Capitalist pig to the core—that’s me.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

instructors had to become pitchmen, with very polished, very manipulative sales presentations.
The more willing a speaker was to offer a “get rich quick” message, the higher his sales were,
and the higher his sales were, the more invitations he got to more platforms from which to sell
his product. Those who made the transition were highly in demand among promoters; those that
insisted on continuing to try to teach, rather than sell, waited by the phone, awaiting promoter
calls that never materialized.

Unfortunately for consumers of real estate investment education, it quickly became clear
that the selling of seminars, NOT the delivery of seminars, was the real profit center.

More and more often, the expert with 20 years experience who SOLD you the seminar
didn’t actually TEACH the seminar—he was replaced by a less-experienced instructor who
simply taught the content provided to him. The guru himself was off selling more seminars to
more students rather than teaching his own classes or, often, rather than investing in real estate
himself.

And thanks to the trend of promoters taking half the profits from the sales at their events,
one of the biggest changes in this era was a push by instructors to raise their own profits by
creating additional courses that attendees could buy while at the 2-day seminar.

After all, when you do the math ($499 for the seminar less $249.50 to the promoter less
the cost of producing the manual and CDs less travel costs, meeting room rental, etc), the typical
profit margin on one seat in one of these seminars is pretty tiny.

So speakers rushed to create “Bootcamps,” which were, at the time, 3 and 4 day events
focused on a single strategy like quick-turning or buying creatively. The shorter, basic-skills
seminars became platforms from which to sell the longer, more profitable bootcamps. Once
you’ve spent $500 with an expert, it’s not nearly as difficult to decide to spend another $2,000 to
dig into a strategy that you really like.

And unfortunately, this was sometimes accomplished by leaving out important details in
the 2-day event and/or preying on the beginner’s natural fear of getting started by hinting (or
later, stating outright) that it might be dangerous from the new investor to buy a deal without the
additional information.

Now, mind you, I have no problem with the bootcamp concept at all. Longer events have
the advantage of allowing learning tools like live calls to sellers, role-playing negotiations,
looking at actual properties, and other “hands-on” experiences that simply can’t be squeezed into
a 2-day event. I attended a number of these events in the early and mid 90s, and most of them
were well worth the investment of time and money, because they earned me a lot more than they
cost me.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

What I DO have a problem with—and you should, too—is what these bootcamps
morphed into by the end of the century. Instead of intensive weekends with your experienced
guru on a focused topic, they became $2,000 “opportunities” to be upsold yet again, usually by
the speakers guru “friends,” who took up valuable time during the supposedly-educational long
weekend to sell you THEIR course or bootcamp.5 The question at the back of my mind was
always, “If this bootcamp is supposed to be the be-all and end-all education about topic x, why
do I need buddy y’s $2,000 course to round it out?”

Nonetheless, as real estate began to boom, these bootcamps filled up month in and month
out, turning many of the investor/experts into multi-millionaires who hadn’t done a deal in years.
Why bother, when a single weekend bootcamp/salesfest could literally generate half a million
dollars in revenue? And HOW does one invest in real estate, when one is “on the road” 250 days
a year pitching bootcamps?

So by the end of the decade, your educational career in real estate probably looked more
like this:

1. Attend a weekend “dog and pony show”


2. Buy one or more relatively inexpensive 2-3 day classes
3. Be upsold from there to one or more $2000+ bootcamps
4. Make a deal—the profits from which went entirely to your credit card company, to
pay off your education

The Real Estate Boom—All Hell Breaks Loose

After the tech stock crash/recession of 2001, the media turned its attention to real estate
as a speculative investment in a big way.

Story after story appeared on the nightly news and in newspapers and magazines around
the country of people who had purchased homes, then sold them a year later for a 5-figure profit.
Americans dove into real estate in a big way, with scary-high appreciation and scary-easy
financing driving the trend.

An unprecedented demand for real estate education developed and, with it, the mass
marketing of seminars via TV infomercials and full-page newspaper ads. Huge companies,
generally represented by a figurehead guru—set up hundreds of the “free meeting” sales pitches

5
Again, I am not critical of all such events. I’ve attended bootcamps that included selling “guest
speakers” that were very good, usually because the sellers were limited to early morning, late evening, or
bonus days. And if I’m informed in advance of how much time will be taken up by the “upsell,” I can
make an intelligent decision about whether or not to attend.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

each week in cities across the U.S. it wasn’t unusual to find 2 or even 3 of these events at the
same hotel on the same weekend in any major metropolitan area.

By this time, these companies were entirely bypassing the REIA system, since they
quickly learned that the members had a better frame of reference than the man on the
street, and were far more immune to the “get rich quick” sales pitch that sometimes had
attendees literally throwing their credit cards at the sales people to get the “first 10 people
only” discount. In fact, the organizers of these events literally barred representatives of REIA
associations from attending, and banned passing out business cards or brochures at their
seminars, lest the attendees get a second opinion on the quality of the education being offered.

And even though both the marketing and the pitches themselves were aimed straight at
the brand-new investor, the prices just kept rising and rising. The most common funnel was this:

1. You’d attend a “free seminar,” where all you learned was how much money other
people had earned by paying $600-$1200 for the upcoming 3-day seminar.

2. At the 3-day seminar, you’d learn how the only way to REALLY know what you
were doing in real estate was to buy the “package” of 5-10 additional seminars at
a cost of—and I’m not exaggerating here—$40,000-$70,000. Oh, and (so the
pitch went), don’t worry about that price: your first few deals would more than
cover it, and we’ll even give you an exercise IN CLASS to get your credit card
limits raised so you can pay for it.

It was at this time that I began hearing from “investors” who’d “invested” 5 figures in
their real estate “education,” and had not yet made an offer on a property. Some were in financial
trouble due to the size of their expenditures; more than one told me they’d taken a second
mortgage on their own home to pay for the classes.

And don’t think that the real estate BUST has left the situation any better; the fact that
everyone who sells real estate education is fishing in a smaller pond has led to an even more
desperate situation. Prices of courses continue to increase, sales pitches get ever-increasingly
“pie in the sky” and high-pressure.

What’s more, there’s been an explosion of courses and seminars offered by “experts”
who have very little actual experience—instead, they’re great internet marketers, or platform
speakers, or even reality-show celebrities who know a lot more about how to pitch education
than they do about how to profitably buy and sell properties.

So here’s what I see today:

1. New investors who are desperate to make money—due to the economy—falling


The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

victim to slick sales pitches for overly-expensive education that doesn’t actually
teach them enough to do deals.

2. REAL experts who can’t sell a quality product because they aren’t willing to
promise that it takes no work.

3. A real estate education industry that leaves most of its customers broke and
cynical.

Get Ready for the “Rant”…


For years now, I’ve been very restrained in sharing my opinion of the real estate
education industry and the precipitous decline in quality and sharp increase in cost of the
information available.

Hypocrisy alert: a big part of the reason for this uncharacteristic hesitation to share my
opinion on this topic has been a sort of self-serving desire to avoid burning bridges in the “guru
community”.

I can guarantee you that the very act of writing this e-book has already made me some
enemies. It’s undoubtedly going to get me banned from events, webinars, and other
opportunities.

Which is unfortunate for my bottom line because, as it happens, I tend to sell a lot of
courses to the students of some of the gurus that I’m about to blast. The fact that I actually
TEACH and have actually DONE DEALS is such a change of pace to their customers that they
tend to flock to the back of the room to buy from me. I am guessing that these words will
literally cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in sales in the next few years, and perhaps a
few students who don’t agree with me, and will certainly earn me widespread and open criticism
from the folks who are doing the things I talk about here.

Another reason for my silence has been a desire to avoid the whole, “she’s just saying
this to torpedo her competition” backlash.

I fully understand that there will be some who view this as a self-serving attempt to draw
people away from other instructors and to me—and yes, I happen to think that I provide a higher
quality of education (and certainly a higher standard of service) than many of my “competitors”.
Otherwise, I’d just retire and be done with it.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

But the fact is, there are a double handful of gurus that I really respect, who ARE
successful real estate investors with years of experience (rather than successful education
salespeople with limited knowledge); who DON’T engage in the despicable practices I’m writing
about here; and who I call on all the time for my own education.6

So despite all of this, I’m breaking my silence, and here’s why: the fact that I am a
provider of real estate education does not obviate the fact that I am also a consumer of it. I
literally receive and review more than 20 new courses every single year. I learned real estate the
same way you are—by depending on people who’d been there first, made all the mistakes, and
had a system that worked to guide me. I love real estate education and the way it can make a
real, long-term difference in people’s lives. I continue to learn new strategies primarily
from other people, because I’m smart enough to know that reinventing the wheel is stupid.
Given my extensive experience as a student, I have a pretty good idea of what a quality
course looks like and what it doesn’t.

Plus, thanks to my “behind-the-scenes” look at what really goes on at seminars, webinars,


bootcamps, etc, I am in a unique position to explain and critique things that you aren’t even
aware of about the education business.

And frankly, a lot of what I see makes me ill.

If you could overhear the cynical, predatory way in which many gurus talk about their
customers…if you were constantly approached by students of these gurus who can’t understand
why they can’t get a return call from the salespeople’s office after spending $4,000 on a
bootcamp…if you understood the total focus on “sales per head” as opposed to providing quality
product…you’d be as sickened by it all as I am. So *deep breath* here goes.

I believe that real estate education can and should be a wonderful resource. Almost
EVERY truly successful investor learns their skills, strategies, and techniques from a real estate
salesperson of some sort. When the system works, it REALLY works—ordinary people do, in
fact, become financially independent by learning from home study courses, seminars,
bootcamps, and classes.

6
Want me to name names? Here are some—Jack Miller, John Schaub, Pete Fortunato , and Dyches Boddiford on
just about anything they teach; John Hyre on taxes and asset protection; Jerry Fink on rehab; Missy McCall-
Hammonds on landlording; Wendy Patton on selling on lease/option. Wondering why you haven’t heard of any of
them? ‘Cause they’re not slick salespeople with $10,000 courses, so promoters don’t use them!
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

It’s in all of our best interest that the education system that has developed survives and
thrives—but I’m afraid for it. With the recent influx of “experts” who are nothing more than
snake oil salesmen, potential students are bound to become cynical and disillusioned with the
whole industry—a possible future that can’t be allowed to come to pass.

And trust me, I have absolutely no problem with charging for this education. People
who’ve learned the ropes, developed a system, and have the ability and desire to teach others to
do the same are amongst my favorite people. When, in addition to being great teachers with great
information, they also hone their sales skills to the point where they can also pitch well, I think
that they should charge whatever the market will bear to make others rich.

However, I also believe that the education industry has been overrun by vermin.
Yep, vermin. “Gurus” who have done 5 deals using someone else’s system, who then repackaged
it and presented themselves as experts even though they have almost no experience to back it up,
who have nothing new to say, who are selling courses that cost thousands of dollars just because
they can, should be ashamed of themselves.

I’m talking to you now, vermin: if your most pressing concern is how many dollars per
head you can sell instead of how detailed and informative your product is and how useful it is to
your students, please get the HELL out of my business.

If you’re one of the many “gurus” I meet who can’t explain a land contract, or doesn’t
know what fair housing is, or actually believes that it’s OK not to study and grasp your own
business, you shouldn’t be able to pitch real estate education and sleep at night. I don’t care how
many people you sucker into buying your garbage. From the point of view of the student who’s
trying to figure out how to navigate the sometimes-confusing waters of real estate investing,
there is NO substitute for experience—LONG TERM experience—and depth of knowledge. If
you don’t have it, you shouldn’t be taking their money.

I don’t care how many millions of dollars your last launch made. Yes, you make more
money than I do selling courses—I get it. I don’t care. You’re preying on people’s desire to get
rich, and you can’t back it up with information they can actually use. You tell them what they
want to hear from the stage, then give them inadequate information that makes THEM feel like
THEY’RE stupid for not being able to generate the big, fat checks you’re showing them on the
screen.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

If you reach deep into your heart and find out that you actually DO care about your
students lives and their success, please clean up your act and start teaching like you do. If you
find that you don’t, please do them the favor of getting a job as a used car salesman.

Back to us students: I believe that you should know the truth about how the money
in the real estate education industry works, so that you can be more immune to all the
cross-promotion. You know how every week you get 30 emails from 15 different gurus
offering you the same course (with different bonuses) and letting you know that you’re going to
die/fail/lose your hair if you don’t buy it?

That’s called a “launch”, and here’s how it works. Guru “A” contacts all of his guru
friends and offers a 50% cut of every course the Guru A sells. Gurus B-Z then send out
professionally prepared emails to all of their students personally recommending A’s course as
the be-all and end-all for your future success. A launch “partner” (that’s B thru Z) with a sizable
list can stand to make tens of thousands of dollars (plus possible win the “top partner” prizes,
which range from Rolexes to Hawaiian vacations) for sending out a few emails to their
customers.

Again, I’m a good capitalist. I have no problem with this arrangement on the surface. The
problem is, THE PEOPLE SENDING YOU THESE EMAILS HAVE OFTEN NOT SEEN OR
REVIEWED THE COURSE IN QUESTION, much less checked out the experience or reliability
of the author.

Now tell me, if I were to send out an email saying that I had made tons of money with
this course, and you needed to get it, too, and I had never even seen the course, wouldn’t that
make me…a liar? This doesn’t seem to bother the people involved in these launches at all,
though—probably because the whole system rotates around an inbred group of guys who are
ALL selling crap7, and who are perfectly happy to rape each other’s lists endlessly until the poor
customers’ dreams are destroyed and/or credit cards get maxed out.

I have had enough experience with these people and enough conversations with the
launch “partners” to know that the whole “my friend A has this great course” thing is largely

7
OK, so that’s not entirely true. Occasionally, I see one of my colleagues whom I actually respect get sucked up into
this maelstrom of sewage, much to their detriment and that of their customers. If one of these good guy gurus ever
DID a launch, I’d totally promote it—but I always want to grab them by the scruff of the neck and shake some sense
into them when they expose their poor students to the garbage OTHER people are promoting.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

bull. They aren’t friends, the launch partner hasn’t made any money from the course (other than
by selling it, of course!), it’s all meant to play on YOUR loyalty to guru B.

Pathetic—and the reason you’ve never seen a launch email from me. And if you ever do,
it will be because I’ve read and used the course in question and actually believe in it.

Oh, and ditto the financial arrangements in a live event or webinar. While the host is
standing at the front of the room raving about how great the next speaker is, you need to think
about the fact that 50 cents of every dollar you spend on said speaker’s product goes into the
pocket of said host, and take all the over-the-top praise with a little grain of salt. Yes, even when
the next speaker is me: I’ve been introduced as “close friend” and even “partner” of people I
never laid eyes on as of 10 minutes before going on stage. And I can usually give my
presentation anyway, after I throw up just a little in my mouth.

I believe that there are certain terms that, when we hear them come from a guru’s
mouth, should send us running for the hills. “Virtual Investing” is one. I’m sorry, I know the
internet is a powerful tool for finding deals, buyers, and money, but the idea that you’re going to
sit at your computer all day and make deals on properties you’ve never seen, then sell them to
people you never talk to, is a pipe dream. A CRACK pipe.

Trust me, I get emails on a daily basis from people who’ve bought into this crap, and my
general response is, “Dear Idiot, the property you’re trying to sell me for $25,000 is one that I
offered $16,000 for a year ago when it HADN’T been sitting vacant for 12 months. And it
doesn’t need $3,000 in work as the seller reported to you, it needs $50,000 in work. And the tax
appraisal that you based your ARV on is 2 years old AND was too high even then, because it was
based on the illegal flip that sent the seller into foreclosure in the first place. Do not waste my
time pitching me on properties you’ve never seen.”

REAL ESTATE IS A PEOPLE BUSINESS. If you’re going to be successful, you have to


talk to someone, at some time. If you hate people, buy a course on how to deal with them
anyway, not one on how to avoid them.

Oh, yeah, and let me put “turn key” and “done for you” into the same category. Surely we
are not so desperate in this country as to believe that “something for nothing”. Yes, some
INVESTMENTS can be turn key—but no BUSINESS—which is what buying and selling
properties is—can be “done for you”! YOU have to do it! And anyone who tells you otherwise
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

either doesn’t understand his own business, or just nakedly wants your money and is willing to
say anything to get it.

I do NOT believe that a newbie investor needs to pay thousands of dollars to learn
to do their first deal. When I started out in the real estate business, there was a general
recognition of the fact that 70% of the knowledge base that you needed to be a successful
investor was shared by every strategy. I don’t care whether you plan to wholesale, retail, landlord
or lease/option, or whether you’re into single families, apartments, raw land, commercial
properties, condos, or mobile homes—you need the same set of basic skills.

Al Lowry, Clarence Jones (my own father), and some of the other progenitors of the real
estate education business knew this. Their courses covered the meat and potatoes, the basic skills
that REALLY make or break a deal…like how to choose the right property. How to evaluate the
repair costs. How to figure out the value. How to negotiate a deal and fill out a contract. How to
talk to sellers and buyers. How to get money from banks, from partners, and from the seller.
How to market properties. How to choose the most profitable exit strategy.

These courses were relatively inexpensive—in the $500 range, for a 2-3 day live class
plus detailed manual and audios. They laid out the skills that the students needed to have to
actually do deals, with no frills, no B.S., and no “upsell”. It was information that anyone willing
to apply it could use—with some help from a local mentor—to do actual deals. And it was cheap
enough that, if by the end of the weekend, the student decided that real estate was just not up his
alley, it wasn’t a major investment that he’d be paying off for years to come.

Today, it’s very common to find new investors who’ve spent $40,000-$70,000 (and 18
months or more) on a series of courses and bootcamps that have taught them no more than they
would have learned in the old Lowry-Nickerson course in the 70s—and who have STILL never
made an offer. When the constant message is, “in order to do a deal, you need to take the next
class, you need to get my friend’s homestudy course, you need to pay for my webinar series…”
instead of, “in order to do a deal, you need to take what I just taught you and use it”…well, how
can a newbie EVER get started?

I think that you SHOULD take the next class. You SHOULD spend more money on
becoming specialized. You SHOULD keep getting educated as long as you like…but I also
think that you should start with a good, basic, cheap, steak-not-sizzle beginner’s class to
figure out what you HAVE to do and what you WANT to do before investing in a bazillion
other courses. In fact, I think you should take that class, get out in the field, get your boots
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

dirty and make some offers before you even consider moving on to that $2,000 bootcamp or
$10,000 mentoring program. Fact is, if you’re not going to do it, you’re not going to do it
whether you spend $500 or $50,000 on education.

I believe that promoters and REIA groups need to take some responsibility for the
explosion of bad education. Every week, I see that some of my most respected guru colleagues
and some of the best REIA groups in the country are giving a stage to some of the worst “flavor
of the month” speakers around. Guys, I get it—they sell a lot, and we all need the money in our
coffers. But whether we’re association board members or seminar promoters, we all owe it to our
members and customers to put QUALITY educators in front of them. They depend on us to do
SOME level of screening of these gurus, because, frankly, many of them are too inexperienced to
have a frame of reference to sort out the bull from the good stuff for themselves.

It is NOT ok, in my opinion, to put a speaker on your stage who lies, or who sells
garbage, or who doesn’t give refunds or who doesn’t fulfill mentoring or any of the other
numerous sins that a lot of these people are known for, no matter how well they sell. And it’s
also not ok to put a speaker on your stage when no one on your board or staff has even checked
the speaker out, reviewed his product, or made an informed decision about whether his strategy
is complete and workable.

Your members should not have to beware of people that are on your stage. “Caveat
emptor” certainly applies online, where most of these folks seem to primarily reside, but an
attitude that says, “hey, he sells well, people want it, who am I to judge?” is all wrong. Those of
us who are in the leadership of groups talk to each other all the time. Between us, we know who
has good stuff and teaches well, so why is the first question we ask “Can he sell?”. That should
be the THIRD question, after, “Is he ethical?” and “does he teach?”.

Don’t get me wrong, when I promote seminars, I want speakers who can sell a lot of
courses, too. And it’s not that I’ve not had some fairly significant missteps in this regard—I can
think of at least 3 presenters that I’ve booked on the recommendation of others, only to watch
horrified from the back of the room as they claimed to have done 3,000 deals in 5 years (I kid
you not) or as they discussed their new breast implants with the audience (again, not kidding)
rather than teach anything. But for heaven’s sake, I don’t BRING THEM BACK. Ditto if they
don’t honor refunds or don’t return calls from students or any of the dozens of other front of the
room or back office atrocities for which some speakers are known.
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

I can tell you for certain that if you see a speaker on MY stage, or hear one on MY
webinars, it’s because I’ve vetted them AND their product AND researched them with other
promoters and on the web, and that I think that their strategies are very workable for the average
Joe, and that I will not say I’ve personally used them if I haven’t. And if I screw up (it happens—
speakers that I’ve worked with in the past sometimes change their programs or develop
fulfillment problems as they become more successful), I’ll say so.

I believe that there are a few key ways to tell the good courses from the bad without
plunking down a credit card to find out. In my experience, there are some behaviors on the
part of speakers that will pretty much tell you whether they’re selling garbage or good
information. Here they are, in no particular order:

1. What’s the refund policy? The longer and more complete the refund is for a particular
course or seminar, the more likely it is that the speaker doesn’t get a lot of refund requests.
Refund requests are more expensive than you think: your credit card company charges the
merchant about 5% of the total amount you spend when you BUY the course, and another 5%
when you RETURN it8. With handling and so on, it costs the speaker about $120 in actual
expenses when you buy and return a $1,000 course—and that’s over and above the fact that they
have to refund your entire investment!

Gurus who stand behind their products, who want them to work for you, and who DON’T
have a lot of unhappy customers returning courses offer generous and easy refund policies. They
make it easy to return courses (by, for instance, giving you their shipping address when you
buy!); they don’t make you jump through a lot of hoops to get your refund (like proving you’ve
made 100 offers); and they have a reasonable refund period (at least 30 days).

When you see a course or seminar that has a 3-day refund policy—the minimum required
by most state’s laws—you can be pretty sure that it’s garbage, and that the guru is depending on
the fact that you can’t get it opened, read, and evaluated before your refund time is up. When you
see a 1-year or lifetime refund policy, you can be pretty sure that others have had good
experience with the product and are not returning it in droves.

8
This, by the way, is one of the reasons that speakers are so sensitive to customers who buy a course, copy it, and
return it or who buy, copy, and sell the original on eBay. Many speakers—and rightly so, in my opinion--are now
“locking” their courses so they can’t be reproduced without voiding the refund policy, and are actively prosecuting
those who do. Plus, it’s against the law and morally wrong to steal other people’s copyrighted materials, so…well, I
know you’d never do that, would you?
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

3. Are you allowed to see what you’re buying before you buy it? This isn’t always
possible with live events—you get the information when you get there, and
there’s no way around it9. But when you’re buying a homestudy course, you
REALLY ought to be able to flip through it before you take it home, right?

The problem is, some “home study courses” are mere workshop manuals in outline form.
They don’t fill in the detail—you’re apparently supposed to do that by listening to the audio,
which is fine for a live course but useless for something you’re supposed to learn from at home

Writing a quality homestudy course is hard work. So hard, in fact, that a lot of gurus
don’t really bother to do so, and so they won’t let you do even a basic review of a course without
buying it. When you see that the product is shrink-wrapped, and there are no open “review
copies” in the back of the room, that’s a BIG warning sign.10

3. Is there a detailed table of contents? This might seem like a minor point, but without a
table of contents, homestudy courses are practically useless as a reference tool. Plus, it shows a
basic lack of care on the part of the author—I mean, how hard is it to let the reader know where a
particular piece of information is?

I believe that undisclosed “forced continuity” programs are immoral, and are going
to land some people in jail—and when they do, I’m not even going to send soap on a rope.
If you’ve been a victim of one of these programs, you know what I’m talking about: you buy a
course, then find that your credit card is being charged $19 a month or $39 a month or $99 a
month and you don’t know why.

Again, I feel obligated to say that there’s nothing wrong with the programs themselves.
My Inner Circle is a continuity program, and I happen to believe it delivers incredible value for
the price. And my program isn’t “forced”—when your membership expires, we don’t just grab
your credit card number off the order form and start charging you! You have to proactively say
that you want to join.

The problem with some speaker’s continuity programs, though, is that they neglect to
mention that you’ll be charged for them at all, and they bury the permission you’re giving them
9
Which is why live events should ALSO have a refund policy…
10
Especially when, as is sometimes the case, breaking the shrink-wrap voids the refund policy!
The Guru Manifesto copyright 2019 Vena Jones-Cox $19.95

to do so in the fine print of the order form. The theory is that most people don’t look at their
credit card statements carefully enough to notice a little charge like that every month, and that
one can make a fortune just off the people who don’t cancel for months on end because they
don’t notice it. And it’s a workable theory—just one that is pissing off a LOT of customers these
days. Check out the chatter on the internet about this: many people are saying they can’t even get
the guru to stop charging them when they ask, until the customer finally runs a chargeback on
their credit cards.

I’m telling you, this is exactly the kind of business practice that prosecutors love to get
their hands on. And in this case, rightly so. It’s wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

I believe that it’s up to the consumer to have a little sense about this stuff. There’s a
reason for all of those old saws about money and success… “You don’t get something for
nothing”. “There’s no such thing as a free lunch”. “If it sounds too good to be true, it probably
is.” When did we lose our grasp on the idea that success = work? When did we start believing
that there WAS such a thing as “get rich quick”? Why is it that so many people thank me for
“revealing” that real estate is a business that requires investments of time, effort, and money, and
yet buy from the guy who says that it’s all done for you?

Here’s the deal: if you’re looking for someone who tells you what you want to hear,
shows you 5 figure checks that his students have earned, and makes the real estate business
sound like it’s all beer and skittles, I can point you to dozens of gurus who will be happy to
fulfill your need to be lied to. But if you’re serious about knowing the warts and all, and you
don’t need hype to be happy, and you’re willing to work hard to be rewarded in an extraordinary
way, stick with the people who aren’t willing to blow smoke up your skirt in order to sell you a
course.

Your gut will tell you when you’re in the right place.

You might also like