Checklist - BSBPMG536

Assessment Task 1: Checklist
Student’s name:
Did the student provide a Completed

sufficient and clear answer successfully? Comments
that addresses the
suggested answer for the Yes No
following?
Question 1
Question 2
Question 3
Question 4
Question 5
Question 6
Question 7
Question 8
Question 9
Task outcome:  Satisfactory  Not yet satisfactory
Assessor signature:
Assessor name:
Date:
Assessment Task 2: Checklist
Student’s name:
Completed
successfully? Comments
Did the student: Yes No
Provide background information,

including:
 summary of the organisation’s

broader work goals (at least two).
 a brief description of their role and

responsibilities within your
organisation.
 explanation of how their role

contributes to the organisation’s
broader work goals (including
project risk management).
 the project context for two projects.
Summarise project risk management

processes, including:
 any applicable standards related to

risk.
 objectives related to managing risk.
 policies and procedures relating to

risk (including any templates),
including:
o project risk classification
criteria
o the risk ranking system
o risk review processes (formal

and informal).
 conventions and protocols for

communicating with internal and
external stakeholders.
 risk identification methods that may

be used to identify project risks (at
least two).
For two separate projects meet with an

appropriate stakeholder to agree on the
risk management process, including:
 confirming the boundaries of their

delegated authority.
 seeking the stakeholder’s input for

risk objectives and standards.
 agreeing on classification criteria

and a risk ranking system to apply
to the project’s risks.
 brainstorming possible risks for the

project.
 agreeing on possible appropriate

risk treatments/responses for a
variety of circumstances and risks.
 agreeing on the consultative

methods to be used when analysing
risk treatment options.
For two separate projects, use a method

other than brainstorming to further
identify project risks (seeking input from
an external stakeholder).
For two separate projects, write a draft

Risk Management Plan (including a Risk
Register) that includes:
 classification of each risk
 application of the agreed risk

ranking system to determine the
risk likelihood, severity and risk
rating.
 Identification of risk priorities.
 Identification of potential outcomes

(threats and opportunities)
associated with each risk (at least
one per risk).
 risk treatments for the potential
outcomes (at least one per risk).
For two separate projects, use an

appropriate consultative method (as
previously agreed to) to consult with at
least two relevant stakeholders to:
 agree on risk priorities.
 analyse the risk treatment options

to choose the best way forward.
For two separate projects, update their

draft Risk Management Plan and Risk
Register to incorporate:
 the input provided by the

stakeholders during the consultative
process.
 risk responsibilities.
For two separate projects, implement the

one of the agreed risk treatments.
For two separate projects, monitor the
project risks including:
 using formal and informal

monitoring processes
 identifying at least one changed

circumstance impacted the project
risks.
For two separate projects, respond to

the changed environment, including:
 evaluating the risk

controls/treatments that were
initially agreed on to determine
whether they are still appropriate for
the changed circumstances
 altering the required response or

creating a new response for any
additional risks (if required).
 modifying their Risk Management

Plan (and Risk Register) to reflect
the changes
 implementing one of the responses.
For two separate projects, review the

project outcomes including:
 a summary of:
o the outcomes of the project
o any risk management issues

faced during the project (at
least one)
o the effectiveness of the risk
management processes and
procedures (for all phases of
the project)
o recommendations for
improvements to the risk
management processes.
 developing at least one

recommended improvement.
Demonstrate effective oral
communication including:
 speaking clearly and concisely
 asking questions to identify required

information
 responding to questions as required
 using active listening techniques to

confirm understanding.
Task outcome:  Satisfactory  Not yet satisfactory
Assessor signature:
Assessor name:
Date:
Final results record
Student name:
Assessor name:
Date
Final assessment results
Result
Not Yet
Task Type Satisfactory Satisfactory Did not submit
Assessment Task 1 Knowledge questions S NYS DNS
Assessment Task 2 Project Portfolio S NYS DNS
Overall unit results C NYC
Feedback
 My performance in this unit has been discussed and explained to me.

 I would like to appeal this assessment decision.
Student signature: _________________________________________ Date: _________________
 I hereby certify that this student has been assessed by me and that the assessment has been
carried out according to the required assessment procedures.
Assessor signature

Checklist - BSBPMG536

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Checklist - BSBPMG536

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Checklist - BSBPMG536

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Assessment Task 1: Checklist

Did the student provide a Completed

Task outcome:  Satisfactory  Not yet satisfactory

Did the student: Yes No

Provide background information,

 summary of the organisation’s

 a brief description of their role and

 explanation of how their role

 the project context for two projects.

Summarise project risk management

 any applicable standards related to

 objectives related to managing risk.

 policies and procedures relating to

o risk review processes (formal

 conventions and protocols for

 risk identification methods that may

For two separate projects meet with an

 confirming the boundaries of their

 seeking the stakeholder’s input for

 agreeing on classification criteria

 brainstorming possible risks for the

 agreeing on possible appropriate

 agreeing on the consultative

For two separate projects, use a method

For two separate projects, write a draft

 classification of each risk

 application of the agreed risk

 Identification of risk priorities.

 Identification of potential outcomes

For two separate projects, use an

 agree on risk priorities.

 analyse the risk treatment options

For two separate projects, update their

 the input provided by the

For two separate projects, implement the

 using formal and informal

 identifying at least one changed

For two separate projects, respond to

 evaluating the risk

 altering the required response or

 modifying their Risk Management

 implementing one of the responses.

For two separate projects, review the

o the outcomes of the project

o any risk management issues

 developing at least one

 speaking clearly and concisely

 asking questions to identify required

 responding to questions as required

 using active listening techniques to

Task outcome:  Satisfactory  Not yet satisfactory

Final assessment results

Assessment Task 1 Knowledge questions S NYS DNS

Assessment Task 2 Project Portfolio S NYS DNS

Overall unit results C NYC

 My performance in this unit has been discussed and explained to me.

Student signature: _________________________________________ Date: _________________

You might also like

Student signature: _________________________ Date: _