Design and Development of 3D Printer Filament Extruder
Design and Development of 3D Printer Filament Extruder
Design and Development of 3D Printer Filament Extruder
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION comparison data of each variable showed only slight
3.1 Percentage error of recycled filament differences in mechanical properties for both materials.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the diameter for every
300 mm long of recycled filament and the percentage
error results for each diameter, respectively. According to
the data, the percentage error for each diameter does not
exceed more than 5%. Nevertheless, the diameter of
recycled filament did not follow to the size of standard
diameter filament which is 1.75 mm.
4. CONCLUSION
The study has shown that it is possible to recycle the
waste part of ABS material and convert it into a filament
by using the Filastruder machine. The results showed that
the original ABS obtained a higher value of maximum
load and tensile stress value which is 724N and 24MPa
respectively. Besides, the original ABS filament is a bit
Figure 3 Percentage of errors for each diameter. flexible compared to recycled ABS filament. However,
the recycled ABS filament is a 4.53% greater strain rate
than the original ABS filament. Overall, the recycled
3.2 Data of tensile strength test
ABS filament is compatible to be a new filament for any
The dog-boned shape specimens were then utilized
kind of 3D printing machine. With this, pollution from
using Instron Material Testing machine to compare the
ABS waste can be reduced.
mechanical properties for both materials. A few
specifications such as the thickness and length of the
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
specimen including the pulling force speed of the
Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka (Grant no.:
mentioned machine was set first before running the test.
PJP/2019/FKM(6A)/S01677).
The comparison of mechanical properties between
original ABS material and recycled ABS material is
REFERENCES
based on their maximum load, tensile stress, tensile
[1] Gebler, M., Uiterkamp, A. J. M. S., & Visser, C.
strain, and Young’s Modulus.
(2014). A global sustainability perspective on 3D
Figure 4 shows that the original ABS filament can
printing technologies. Energy Policy, 74, 158-167.
withstand a higher load compared to recycled ABS
[2] Schubert, C., Langeveld, van, M. C., & Donoso, L.
filament due to the necking point of recycled filament
A. (2013). Innovations in 3D printing : a 3D
happens to fast and extremely decrease to rapture. In
overview from optics to organs. Ophthamology,
addition, the tensile strength result illustrated that
98(2), 3-6.
recycled ABS filament has lower tensile strength than the
[3] Ramli, F. R., Faudzie, M. S. M., Nazan, M. A.,
original ABS filament by reason of incompact filament
Alkahari, M. R., Sudin, M. N., Mat, S., & Khalil, S.
structure during the extruding process. Furthermore, the
N. (2018). Dimensional accuracy and surface
graph also shows that the original ABS has a higher
roughness of part features manufactured by open
tensile strain with a value of 0.0309 mm/mm and a bit
source 3D printer. APRN Journal of Engineering
flexible compared to recycled ABS filament. Flexible
and Applied Sciences, 13(3), 1139-1144.
material tends to obtain a small value of Modulus Young.
[4] Kreiger, M. A., Mulder, M. L., Glover, A. G., & M.
The recycled ABS filament is easy to rapture since the
Pearce, J. (2014). Life cycle analysis of distributed
waste already heated by a 3D printing machine before
recycling of post-consumer high density
this. Thus, re-heating the waste can further weaken the
polyethylene for 3-D printing filament. Cleaner
structure and strength of the filament. Overall, the
Production, 70, 90-96.
294