M.Sc. Research Proposal: Okeke, Onyekwelu Uzodinma. Supervisor: Professor J E Lowther October 3, 2006
M.Sc. Research Proposal: Okeke, Onyekwelu Uzodinma. Supervisor: Professor J E Lowther October 3, 2006
M.Sc. Research Proposal: Okeke, Onyekwelu Uzodinma. Supervisor: Professor J E Lowther October 3, 2006
Research Proposal Electronic Structures, Elastic Constants and the Stability of a Novel Spinel Structure by Ab initio Calculations
Okeke, Onyekwelu Uzodinma. okekeo@science.pg.wits.ac.za or okekeou@gmail.com Supervisor : Professor J E Lowther October 3, 2006
Summary of Proposal
Spinel structures are class of oxides with a chemical formula AB2 O4 where the cation to anion ratio distribution is 3:4. This work involves the computational modelling of the spinel materials resulting from the group-III oxides and nitrides by ab initio plane wave pseudopotential calculations. The theoretical properties of the electronic structures (the ground state energies, the band structures, density of states and charge densities), elastic constants and their stabilities will be investigated.
Spinel Structure
The spinel structure of novel materials are rapidly emerging as having potential ultra-hard properties. Basically, a spinel-structured material has the ratio 3:4 in their cation to anion distribution. Spinel could be in binary (e.g Si3 N4 ), or in ternary (e.g MgAl2 O4 ) or in quaternary phases (e.g Si6z Alz Oz N8z ) [1]. The main study on this research work would be based on the ternary spinel structures. In general, spinel structures refers to a class of oxides with a chemical formula AB2 O4 where A and B are either divalent (+2) and trivalent (+3) or tetravalent (+4) and divalent cations. The structural models of spinel is illustrated in Fig. (1) and (2). In both gures the anion sites are at the corners of octahedral/tetrahedral.
Figure 1: Atomistic models of the cubic spinel structure, where the octahedral cation sites are highlighted with octahedral and the tetrahedral cation sites are represented with balls [2].
Figure 2: Atomistic models of the cubic spinel structure, where the tetrahedral cation sites are highlighted with tetrahedral and the octahedral cation sites are represented with balls [2].
The oxygen ions or arrays of anions in the spinel structures are in close-packing (ccp or fcc) structure, where two types of interstices known as the octahedral and tetrahedral are found. A and B cations occupy the tetrahedral and the octahedral interstitial sites [2, 3]. Eight 1
formula units make up a unit cell of spinel (A8 B16 O32 ) which contains 56 atoms . Spinel structure can be divided into two types: normal (or direct) and inverse spinel. The unit cell of the normal spinel has 32 oxygen ions, 32 octahedral interstices with B cations at the 1 1 1 1 ( 1 , 2 , 1 ) positions and 64 tetrahedral interstices with A cations at the ( 8 , 8 , 8 ) positions. In 2 2 inverse spinel, the cations may shift between the A and B sites. Half of the B cations go to the tetrahedral sites and the A cations go to octahedral interstices. The general formula for an inverse spinel structure is given as B(AB)O4 [4]. The range of cation distribution for both the normal and inverse spinel can be determined by their relative ionicity or ionic radii [5]. Additionally, mixed spinel structure of the form (A12 B2 )(A2 B22 ), could also be possible, where is the inversion parameter ranging from 0 for the normal to 0.5 for the inverse spinel [6]. Spinel belongs to the space group of f d3m (No. 227) [7]. The focus of this research work will be to investigate a novel spinel structure with chemical formula A3 NO3 , where A represents Boron (B), Aluminium (Al), Galium (Ga), and Indium (In) which are the group 3 elements of the periodic table. Spinel of these form could be regarded as a double spinel with A occupying both the tetrahedral and octahedral sites. The chemical equation for the spinel is given as:
A3 NO3 A2 O3 + AN where the right hand side of equation (1) represents the group-III oxides and nitrides.
(1)
Figure 3: A model of vitreous B2 O3 structure with boron atoms residing in the boroxol rings [11].
B2 O3 -I is known as the low-pressure structure of B2 O3 , obtained at a pressure of 2 GPa with a hexagonal unit cell. It crystallizes in space group P 31 with a = 4.336, c = 8.340 as A reported by Gurr et al [15]. B2 O3 -II is the high-pressure phase structure of B2 O3 obtained at a pressure of 6.5 GPa and temperature of 1100 o C. The structure of B2 O3 -II is orthorhombic with a = 4.6130.001, b = 7.803 0.002, c = 4.129 0.001, and space group Ccm2, built up by two sets of tetrahedral A with shared corners as described by Prewitt and Shannon [16]. It could be observed that under pressure, crystal B2 O3 undergoes a structural transformation that increases the boron coordination from BO3 triangular unit into the BO4 tetrahedral unit [17]. The structures of B2 O3 -I and B2 O3 -II are shown in Fig. (4) and (5).
hexagonal close packed (hcp) rhombohefral crystal structure with stacking sequence ABAB and lattice parameter ao = 0.476 nm and co = 1.299 nm [18, 19]. The transition alumina exist in many transient metastable forms such as , , , , , and alumina where , , , , possess a face centered cubic (fcc) array of oxygen anions with the aluminum cations ocupying a portion of the available octahedral and tetrahedral interstices and , and are the metastable form of the hexagonal close packed (hcp) array of oxygen anions [20]. Among the transition alumina, , , and are all believe to be spinel-based with cation to anion ratio of 2:3. However, in recent studies, tetragonal representations of the aluminua structure with I41 /amd space group symmetry and a maximum subgroup of F d have 3m been proposed [18].
The phase transition temperature from Ga2 O3 to Ga2 O3 is about 600 o C. Ga2 O3 thus has the strong advantage of low synthesis temperature as compared to that of Ga2 O3 [21, 22].
Table 1: Physical properties of group-III nitrides [26]. Material Band gap (eV) GaN wurtzite 3.5 Lattice constants (a, c) Ionicity and bond lenghts (b, d) () A (Phillips) a = 3.1892 c = 5.1850 c/a = 1.626 b/c = 0.377 b = 1.955; d = 1.9486 a = 4.511 c = 2.1923 a = 3.1106 c = 4.9795 c/a = 1.601 b/c = 0.3821 b = 1.90; d = 1.807 a = 4.38 b = 2.1287 a = 3.54 c = 5.70 c/a = 1.601 a = 4.98 b = 2.4203 a = 2.54 c = 4.17 c/a = 1.64 b/c = 0.375 b = 1.156; d = 1.556 a = 3.616 b = 1.7573 0.43 Ratio of states nos. Valence N/Ga = 3.5 Ga/N = 0.28 Conduc. 0.67 1.49
3.3 6.1
0.44
0.57
N/Al = 4.6 Al/N = 0.22 N/In = 4.4 In/N = 0.23 N/B = 4.0 B/N = 0.25 N/B = 2.2 B/N = 0.45
0.36
BN cubic
6.1 6.4
0.80 1.25
(2)
where H is the Hamiltonian for a system consisting of M nuclei and N electrons and the wave-function is a function of all the electronic and nuclear denoted by xi and RI . 1 H= 2
N
2 i
i=1
1 2 1 2 A=1 MA A
i=1
ZA + riA A=1
i=1 j>i
(3)
The sum over A and B run over the M nuclei while the sum over i and j run over the N electrons. Hartree atomic units, = m = e = 1, will be used throughout. The rst two parts describe the kinetic energy of the electrons and nuclei respectively. The remaining three terms represent the attractive electrostatic (Coulomb) interaction between 9
the nuclei and the electrons and the repulsive potential due to the electron and nucleusnucleus interactions respectively [31]. The fundamental quantity in DFT is the electron density. This theory has made it possible to replace the complicated N -electron wave-function, and the associated Schrdinger equao tion as expressed in eqn. (2) by electronic density and its associated schemes. All aspects of the electronic structure of the system of interacting electrons in an external potential, are determined by the electronic charge density [32]. The Hohenberg-Kohn Theorems and the Kohn-Sham approach has been the building block that gave birth to the DFT theory. Hohenberg-Kohn [33] proved that the ground-state energy can be written as a unique functional of the electron density. Kohn-Sham [34] derived Schrdinger-like single-particle equations by introducing an energy functional for the total o energy of the electronic system which can be written as, 1 2 (r1 )(r2 ) + r12
E[] = T [] +
VN e (r)dr + Exc []
(4)
Eqn. (4) contains the individual contributions of the kinetic energy, T [], the classical Coulomb interaction, the attractive electrostatic interaction between the nuclei and the electrons and a term called the exchange-correlation energy that captures all many-body interaction. All quantities except for Exc [] are known and could be easily calculated from the wave-function of the non-interacting system. The exchange-correlation energy, Exc [], is the functional which contains everything that is unknown, and it is normally resolved through approximations. Therefore, when all the various contributions in Eqn. (4) are known, then the orbitals, including the ground state density and the ground state energy can be determined. There are basically dierent types of approximations involved in a DFT calculation for the unknown Exc [] functional. The approximation that is of interest in this research will involve constructing an expression for the unknown Exc [] functional, which contains all the manybody aspects of the problem [see. Eq.(4)] [19]. The approximations to be investigated are Local Density Approximation (LDA) and the Generalized Gradient Approximation (GGA). The results of the ground state properties of these approximations would be compared in this work.
10
(r)xc (r)dr
(5)
where xc (r) is the exchange-correlation energy density of the uniform electron gas of density (r) [31].
f ( , , , )d(r)
(6)
As could be observed from Eqn. (6), the explicit dependence of this integrand f on the GGA desities and their gradients exit. In practice, Exc is usually split into its exchange and correlation contributions: GGA GGA GGA + Ec (7) Exc = Ex and approximations for the two terms are sought individually [31].
11
Computational Implementation
The ab initio calculations will be implemented by the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP). Vasp is a package for performing ab-initio quantum-mechanical molecular dynamics (MD) using pseudopotentials and a plane wave basis set. It is a density functional code developed by Georg Kresse and Jrgen Furthmller [35]. u u
ci , Gei(K+G)r
(8)
where G are the reciprocal lattice vectors. The sum is truncated at a cut-o energy, Ecut = max|K + G|2 /2. The concept of pseudopotential is introduced in the use of the plane wave basis set to signicantly reduce the large number of plane waves which arise when the valence wave-functions oscillates rapidly within the core region due to the the orthogonalization of the core or inner electronic wave-functions. In using the pseudopotential, the inner electrons are ignored since they are inert and are not signicantly involved in bonding. Therefore, the use of an eective potential, a pseudopotential, that approximate the potential felt by the valence electrons ensures the a smaller number of plane wave basis states [35].
Motivation
The motivation is the search for a new novel spinel ultra-hard material that would be important for industrial applications both locally and abroad.
12
Bibliography
[1] J. E. Lowther, M. Schwarz, E. Kroke, and R. Riedel. J Solid State Chem, 176:549, 2003. [2] Jianjun Dong, F. S. Otto, Emmanuel Soignard, and Paul F. M. Phys. Rev. B, 67:094104, 2003. [3] D. Bacorisen, Roger Smith, J. A. Ball, R. W. Grimes, B. P. Uberuaga, K. E. Sickafus, and W. T. Rankin. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B, 250:36, 2006. [4] J. M. Recio, R. Franco, Martin Pendas, M. A. Blanco, and L. Pueyo. Phys. Rev. B, 63:184101, 2001. [5] J. D. Mark, C. P Stephen, and W. W. Graeme. J. Mater. Chem., 46:813, 1994. [6] W. Y. Ching, Mo. Shang-Di, Lizhi Ouyang, Isao Tanaka, and Masato Yoshiya. Phys. Rev. B, 61:16, 2000. [7] W. Y. Ching, Mo. Shang-Di, Lizhi Ouyang, Isao Tanaka, and Masato Yoshiya. Phys. Rev. B, 63:064102, 2001. [8] O. M Moon, B. C. Kang, S. B. Lee, and J. H. Boo. Thin Solid Films, 464-465:164, 2004. [9] Demir Halil, Sahin Omer, Sait Izgi Mehmet, and Firatoglu Hassan. Thermochimica Acta, 445:1, 2006. [10] Ma Renzhi and Bando Yoshio. Chem. Phys. Lett., 374:358, 2003. [11] S. J. Hwang, C. Fernandez, Amoureux J. P., J. Cho, and S. W. Martin. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson., 8:109, 1997. [12] Jhi Seung-Hoon and Kwon Young-Kyun. Phys. Rev. B, 71:035408, 2005. [13] G. Simon, B. Hehlen, E. Courtens, E. Longueteau, and R. Vacher. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96:105502, 2006. 13
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[14] J. Swenson and L. Brjesson. Phys. Rev. B, 55:11138, 1997. o [15] G. E. Gurr, P. W. Montgomery, C. D. Knutson, and B. T. Gorres. Acta Cryst. B, 26:906, 1970. [16] C. T. Prewitt and R. D. Shannon. Acta Cryst. B, 1968. [17] Nieto-Sanz Delia, Loubeyre Paul, Crichton Wilson, and Mezouar Mohamed. Phys. Rev. B, 70:214108, 2004. [18] G. Paglia, C. E. Bukley, A. L. Rohl, B. A. Hunter, R. D. Hart, J. V. Hanna, and L. T. Byrne. Phys. Rev. B, 68:144110, 2003. [19] Capelle Klaus. Cond-mat/0211443, 2005. [20] C. Wolverton and K. C. Hass. Phys. Rev. B, 63:024102, 2000. [21] Minna Nieminen, Lauri Niinisto, and Eero Rauhala. J. Mater. Chem., 6(1):27, 1996. [22] Sungryong Cho, Jongwon Lee, In-Yong Park, and Seontai Kim. Mat. Lett., 57:1004, 2002. [23] Ch. Y. Wang, V. Cimalla, H. Romanus, Th. Kups, G. Ecke, Th. Stauden, and M. Ali. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89:011904, 2006. [24] Kwiseon Kim, R. T. L. Walter, and Benjamin Segall. Phys. Rev. B, 53:16310, 1996. [25] Krystian Karch and Friedhelm Bechstedt. Phys. Rev. B, 56:7404, 1997. [26] K. Lawniczak-Jablonska, T. Suski, I. Gorczyca, N. E. Christensen, K. E. Attenkofer, R. C. C. Perera, E. M Gullikson, J. H. Underwood, and Z. Liliental Weber. Phys. Rev. B, 61:16623, 2000. [27] V. A. Gubanov, M. Lu, Z. W. amd Barry Klein, and C. Y. Fong. Phys. Rev. B, 53:4377, 1996. [28] N. Nepal, B. Nam, J. Li, M. L. Nakarmi, and H. X. Jiang. Appl. Phys. Lett., 88:261919, 2006. [29] Eunsoon Oh, Jung Ho Choi, Han-kyu Seong, and Heon-Jin Choi. Appl. Phys. Lett., 89:092109, 2006. [30] S. P. Fu, T. J. Lin, W. S. Su, C. Y. Shieh, Y. F. Chen, C. A. Chang, N. C. Chen, and P. H. Chang. J. Appl. Phys., 99:126102, 2006. 14
BIBLIOGRAPHY
[31] W. Koch and M. C. Holthausen. A Chemists Guide to Density Funtional Theory. WILEY-VCH, 2001. [32] R. G. Parr and W. Yang. Density Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules. Oxford University press, New York, 1989. [33] P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn. Phys. Rev., 136:B864, 1964. [34] W. Kohn and L. J. Sham. Phys. Rev., 140:A1133, 1965. [35] Mag. Tanja Futschek. Structural, Electronic and Magnetic properties of Transition Metal Clusters. PhD thesis, Institute fr Materialphysik, Center for Computational u Materials Science, Universitt Wein, 2005. a
15