0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views8 pages

Water Quality Management Using GIS and RS Tools: Conference Paper

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 8

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/268588854

Water quality management using GIS and RS tools

Conference Paper · May 2012


DOI: 10.1061/9780784412312.086

CITATIONS READS
5 10,541

1 author:

Arjumand Zaidi
USPCASW Mehran University of Engineering and Technology
64 PUBLICATIONS 155 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Indus River Water Level Monitoring in Sindh using Satellite Radar Altimetry View project

Assessment of stock and market potential of consumable seaweeds along on-shore and very near-shore waters of Karachi Coast View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Arjumand Zaidi on 10 April 2015.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 842

WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT USING GIS AND RS TOOLS


Arjumand Z. Zaidi
Assistant Professor, RS and GIS department, Institute of Space Technology (IST), Karachi, Pakistan; PH
(92-21)34650765
Email: arjumand.zaidi@ist.edu.pk

ABSTRACT

Recent advances in remote sensing (RS) approaches have provided the capacity to acquire water
quality information at spatial and temporal resolutions beyond the capability of infrequent and
point scale in-situ measurement. Through integrating remote sensing data with Geographic
Information Systems (GIS), an advanced approach to study water quality issues is possible.
Traditional water quality assessment and monitoring techniques are time, data and consequently
capital intensive - often beyond the means of developing countries. Utilizing the geospatial
capacity of RS and GIS approaches provides a cost-effective and research quality solution to
these issues. The purpose of this paper is to present an integrated approach utilizing geospatial
techniques to address water quality issues under the framework of US Environmental Protection
Agency’s (USEPA) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program. A TMDL is the calculated
maximum amount of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive without violating the water quality
standard appropriate for its intended use. This paper will demonstrate the usefulness of these
technologies by proposing a RS and GIS based water quality predictive model. The future goal
of this study is to apply the proposed strategy for developing countries where project budgets are
usually very limited to show the usefulness of geospatial technologies in optimizing limited
resources of a project without compromising the reliability of outputs - rather more realistic
outcomes are expected to be achieved.

INTRODUCTION

In recent years remote sensing systems have advanced in leaps and bounds. Several
efforts have been put in worldwide by researchers employing remote sensing (RS) and
geographical information systems (GIS) techniques for acquiring water quality data. The
repetitive multispectral and synoptic nature of satellite remote sensing may provide a continuous
monitoring of waterbodies, both spatial and temporal, as opposed to a limited frequency point
measurement. Water quality restoration programs can utilize RS and GIS techniques for water
quality monitoring and management. Traditional water quality assessment and monitoring
techniques are time, data and consequently capital intensive. The geospatial technologies for
such studies are proved to be more cost effective and accurate as compared to the traditional
approaches. In this study an advance and cost effective approach is proposed using emerging
technologies of satellite RS and GIS for water quality restoration programs.

TMDL program is a well known water quality restoration program of United States
Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). TMDLs are developed for the pollutants that cause
a waterbody to be impaired or threaten for its desired use(s). Key pollutants requiring TMDLs
are sediments, pathogens, nutrients, metals, dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH, mercury,
pesticides and organics (USEPA, 2011). Remote sensing applications are limited to measuring
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 843

those substances or conditions that influence and change optical and/or thermal characteristics of
the surface water properties like suspended sediments and temperature (Ritchie et al., 2004).
Other pollutants can be measured indirectly utilizing RS techniques through surrogate indicators
(chlorophyll a for nutrients: Chlorophyll a is an indicator of algal biomass caused by the elevated
nutrient levels).

TMDL is chosen in this study for integrating RS and GIS techniques into its traditional
process in the form of a predictive model. A modified TMDL process called Economic TMDL
(Zaidi and deMonsabert, 2008) is used for this study. A TMDL represents the maximum amount
of a pollutant that a waterbody can receive without violating the water quality standard defined
for a given use. The TMDL process first calculates the maximum quantity of pollutant load that a
waterbody can receive from all sources without exceeding the water quality standards and then it
allocates this load among the identified sources. The Economic TMDL process performs an
additional economic analysis at load allocation phase. The objective of this paper is to
demonstrate the potential of RS and GIS techniques in assessing the water quality parameters
and monitoring the effectiveness of subsequent cleanup operations for water quality restoration
programs like Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL).

BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION

Water quality deterioration has now become a global problem irrespective of any
particular geographical or climatologically limitations or socio-economic factors. Most
developed regions of the world are also facing impairment of water resources due to the growing
pollution in their waterbodies. The quality of water can be affected not only by point source
pollutants but major pollution contributing factors now-a-days are nonpoint sources impairing
thousands of waterbodies worldwide. Runoff from agricultural areas and urban land carries
majority of the nonpoint source pollutants to these waters. Water quality issues in developing
countries are even more serious where project budgets are usually very limited for implementing
the water quality restoration plans resulting in a high vulnerability of the population at risk.

The rising number of impaired waterbodies coupled with the growing demand for water
is the main driving force behind initiation of water restoration programs all over the world.
Water restoration and management programs require pollution from contributing sources to be
reduced to levels that are consistent with the waterbody’s assimilative capacity. An example of
such programs is United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Total Maximum
daily Load (TMDL). TMDL program of USEPA is a water-quality based initiative to restore US
impaired waters for their intended uses under its Clean Water Act.

For an effective pollution reduction plan, it is imperative to assess and monitor the
quality of water which is more representative of the actual condition of the whole waterbody
while dealing with the economic and technological limitations. The traditional approaches
include calibrating/validating water quality model based on ground measured data. The ground
measured data is obtained either by collecting samples and analyzing them in a laboratory
environment or through onsite water quality monitoring stations. Usually these monitoring sites
are located at some fixed points and therefore the field observations provide only discrete
measurements in time and space. The assessment of an entire waterbody based on the data
acquired at these few locations may not represent actual condition by completely missing the
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 844

spatial aspect of pollution distribution. The knowledge of spatial distribution of environmental


parameters is important for understanding the quality of water. Also, if there are some
abnormalities present at these monitoring sites then the quality assessment may deliver erroneous
results. Not only the water quality data representative of the actual condition is required for
cleanup programs like TMDLs but also up to date landuse and land cover information is required
while dealing with the nonpoint pollutants. All of the required data/information if acquired
through traditional approaches is discontinuous in time and space and also time and capital
intensive. Remote sensing data along with ground measurements can provide continuous
temporal and spatial mapping of water quality parameters. RS and GIS techniques can also be
used in formulating the management plans to improve the quality of impaired waters. An
effective TMDL implementation plan can be developed by managing landuse activities using RS
and GIS techniques to reduce pollutant movements to the waterbody. Information regarding rate
of development or the pollution producing activities within a drainage area when compared with
temporal water quality variation may help in establishing a link between contributing pollution
sources and their impact on the quality of receiving water. This information is very helpful for
identifying critical pollutant sources, allocating pollutant budget to polluters and developing
overall management plans.

Many researchers have employed RS techniques to assess various water quality parameters
such as suspended sediments or turbidity, temperature, and chlorophyll a (Ritchie et al., 2004,
Ahmad, 2007, and others).The previous studies of this type have shown a good relationship
between distribution of suspended sediment concentrations and spectral reflectance of satellite
images. Thermal band of satellite data is used for calculating the surface temperature of
waterbodies. Other variables that can not be quantified through satellite data like bacteria and
nutrient, surrogate indicators are being tested for their validity.

Utilization of RS and GIS tools for environmental planning and management is considered to
be an effective approach when these tools are integrated with other traditional methods. RS and
GIS may be used for developing predictive models in almost every field of environment. A
predictive model is a planning and management tool. Few examples of such models may be in
the form of a map, a series of maps, a mathematical simulation model or a combination of maps
and mathematical models. A relevant question might be that what is the advantage of bearing an
extra cost which is many times substantial in terms of acquiring RS imagery, image processing,
and cost of GIS software and GIS data processing? The growing exploitation of RS and GIS
tools for real world environmental problems such as watershed management, urban planning,
disease ecology, and many other environment related fields is a sufficient proof that traditional
approaches strengthen by RS and GIS tools can enhance the accuracy of prediction up to the
extent which may easily justify the extra cost of using these tools. RS and GIS tools are helpful
in acquiring data related to many environmental variables like soil type, topography, type of
vegetation cover, density of vegetation cover, slope, water/soil coverage, etc. Figure 1 presents a
conceptual scheme for a RS based Water Quality Restoration and Planning Model (integration of
GIS/RS Tools and Water Quality Model).
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 845

Remotely Sensed Image Processing


Imagery
Merge
Environmental Variables
• Metrological Data
• Population Data GIS Layers
• Live Stock data (Spatial + Aspatial Data)
• Water quality criteria • Landuse coverage
• Etc. • Soil Type
• Forest Cover
• Streams
• Elevation
• Watershed Boundary
• Etc.

Water Quality Model

Predictive Model for Water Quality Restoration and


Planning

Figure 1: Conceptual scheme for a Generic Water Quality Restoration and Planning
Model

PROPOSED FRAMEWORK

In this paper a water quality restoration and planning model is proposed in Figure 2. In
this model GIS and RS tools are integrated with a water quality model to predict quality of an
impaired water body and management schemes to restore the quality up to a level which satisfies
the water quality criteria. The capabilities of the proposed model may also be enhanced by
integrating it with an economic optimization model to establish a cost effective water quality
restoration plan. The economic model will also derive information from GIS layers. The
economical load allocation scenario may be determined through determining the most
appropriate spatial locations of control measures and this can easily be done by incorporating
GIS in TMDL economic model.
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 846

Identify Impaired Waters List Impaired Waters

Select Waterbody

Calculate Existing Loads from Data Module


Identify Sources Individual Sources

Load Allocation Phase Processed Satellite


Data
Run Water Quality Model

Develop Load Allocations for Multiple Scenarios


GIS
Layers
Select Acceptable Load Allocation Scenarios

Minimize Cost at Watershed Level using Economic TMDL Model Environmental


Data

Develop Cost vs. Load Reduction Decision Matrix


for all Acceptable Scenarios

Allocate Load

Implement Load
Output Reports and Maps

Monitor

Figure 2: Water Quality Predictive Model under USEPA Total Daily Maximum Load
(TMDL)
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 847

Model Strengths

The RS based water quality predictive model is capable of achieving the following
objectives:

ƒ Integrating geospatial (RS/GIS) techniques into TMDL traditional process


ƒ Developing multivariate statistical relationships between water quality variables,
(suspended sediments, temperature, Chlorophyll a) and multispectral satellite data for
sample waterbodies using geostatistical tools, satellite imagery and real-time in situ
measurements,
ƒ Testing of surrogate indicators for measuring the parameters that can not be quantified
through satellite data like bacteria and nutrients,
ƒ Comparing the results of the model in terms of accuracy and cost with the results
acquired through traditional approaches,
ƒ Developing water quality thematic maps for environmental parameters modelled in the
study,
ƒ Developing maps showing temporal changes in quality of water in sample water bodies
using historical RS data,
ƒ Developing maps showing violation of water quality standards, and
ƒ Generating data and thematic maps that may be further used for future analysis

The methodology for establishing spatial relationship between satellite data and field
measured water quality parameters involves the following key steps:

Acquisition of Satellite Data

Multi-temporal satellite data is required for this purpose. For Landuse/ land cover
classification medium-spatial resolution Landsat satellite data can be used. Multispectral data
from earth observing satellite SPOT 5 and Landsat 7 data may be utilized for establishing spatial
relationship between satellite data and field measured water quality parameters.

RS and GIS Analysis

Geo-referenced datasets may be created using digitally processed satellite images using
image to image or map to image geo-referencing techniques. The following key steps are
required for the analysis:

i. Classification of RS images to determine landuse/land cover activities (helps in


pollutant source identification to better define TMDLs)
ii. Watershed delineation
iii. Water quality monitoring utilizing RS techniques to run water quality models and
develop TMDLs
iv. Temporal analysis to understand changes in water quality and landuse/land cover
parameters necessary for developing effective water quality management
strategies
v. TMDL implementation impact assessment following the cleanup operations can
be done using both pre and post implementation satellite images since TMDL
World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2012: Crossing Boundaries © ASCE 2012 848

program also mandates to develop cleanup plans for polluted waters and monitor
their effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of this study is to show the potential of integrating RS and GIS techniques in
water quality restoration programs. An advance and cost effective approach is proposed for water
quality monitoring and management of impaired waterbodies under the framework of US
Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) program.
Remote sensing based water quality predictive model is presented in this paper that involves
developing GIS thematic maps for different water quality parameters for impaired waterbodies
by establishing spatial relationship between satellite data and field measured water quality
parameters. The success of the methodology will enable rapid mapping of water quality
parameters lot easier than the traditional means. The results of the study could be used to
evaluate the quality of a waterbody used for different purposes. RS/GIS temporal and spatial
analysis tools will enable more reliable and timely assessment of temporal changes in water
quality. The beneficiaries of this study will comprise of but not limited to water quality
restoration programs all over the world. The effectiveness of these programs can also be
monitored on a repetitive basis utilizing this approach.

REFERENCES

1. Ahmad, S.R., (2007). “Using satellite data to assess sediments in Near-shore waters along
the Guyana Coast”. Journal of Indo Caribbean Research. Vol.7, No.1, Academic Source
Publishers, pp.55‐71.

2. Ritchie, J., Cooper, C., (2004). “Remote Sensing Techniques for Determining Water
Quality: Applications to TMDLs”. USDA Agriculture Research Service, Hydrology and
Remote Sensing Laboratory and National Sedimentation Laboratory. http://www.geo.tu-
freiberg.de/studenten/Baikal_2004/remote_water_quality.pdf

3. USEPA, (2011): “Impaired Waters and Total Maximum Daily Loads”, United States
Environmental Protection Agency. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/

4. Zaidi, A., deMonsabert, S. El. Farhan R., (2008). “How to Include Economic Analysis
TMDL Allocation?” J. Water Resour. Plng. and Mgmt-ASCE. 134(3), 214-10.

View publication stats

You might also like