Empowering the Philippines: A Resolute Stand in Favor of Restricting International Imports and Boosting

the Local Agricultural Sector for Sustainable Food Security

Word Count: 2331 Words

It is without a doubt that food is one of the most critical requirements for a person to survive; this

is because it provides energy essential for continued life. Nutrients are compounds that are necessary

for the regulation of vital activities as well as the growth, repair, and maintenance of body tissues

(National Geographic, 2023). It is not only a support for the vitality and energy of mankind, as well as a

critical point of national independence. In the modern world with complex problems, the issue of food

security becomes a crucial pillar for building the state’s prosperity. A study mentioned by Pawlak (2020)

supported this idea by stating that ensuring food security has become an issue of crucial importance to

countries with different degrees of economic development. At the same time, the agricultural sector

plays a strategic role in improving food availability. This is especially true for the Philippines, a country

so closely related to the agriculture sector. The Philippines is the seventh-largest market for agricultural

exports and the top market in Southeast Asia (International Trade Administration, 2022), where this

issue becomes even more crucial. Confronted by the ever-evolving complexities of global food security

and sustainability challenges, it becomes imperative for this nation to respond with agility and wisdom.

This position paper staunchly supports the Philippine government's decision to restrict international

imports of goods while simultaneously nurturing the growth of the local agricultural sector. This strategy

goes beyond merely defending national sovereignty; it also serves as a practical response to the

disastrous effects of food scarcity, protecting the well-being and prosperity of the Filipino people. This

essay will outline the critical necessity for such a posture, clarify the advantages it offers, and emphasize

the crucial part it plays in the Philippines' resilience and further progress.
 Food security is not only a vague idea; it is essential to a country's sovereignty and the welfare of

its citizens as a whole (Sunderland, 2011). The importance of food security is highlighted in the context

of the Philippines, a nation with a strong agricultural heritage.

The Philippines, like many other countries in today's globalized world, is primarily dependent on imports

from abroad for its food needs. This dependence, while providing convenience, renders the nation

vulnerable to external shocks capable of disrupting the food supply chain. Recent events, such as the

COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters, have laid bare the fragility of this reliance. The vulnerability

of the Philippines is further exacerbated by its susceptibility to volatile global food prices. Fluctuations in

the cost of essential commodities directly impact the affordability of food for its citizens, potentially

leading to periods of scarcity and nutritional challenges for low-income households. In a survey done by

the United Nations Development Programme—Philippines on May 2020 in 10 cities in Metro Manila and

4 cities in Cebu, about 83% of households experienced a reduction in income, about 34% totally lost

their source of income, and about 33% reported having to skip a meal in a week (Angeles-Agdeppa et

al., 2022).The pandemic-induced border closures and other disruptions in international supply chains

have underscored the urgency of developing a diversified and resilient domestic food supply system.

While participation in the global market is crucial, an overreliance on it, without a robust local food

production and distribution network, can leave the nation exposed during crises. However, the local

agricultural sector in the Philippines grapples with a host of challenges, inhibiting its capacity to

contribute to food security significantly. Among these are mentioned in Lamentillo (2022), stating that

combined climate hazards, such as typhoons, flood, and drought will cause serious threats to food

security. A major risk is price volatility of food items caused by disruption of food production in areas

affected by climate-related hazards. Amidst these daunting challenges, land degradation emerges as a

paramount concern. This pervasive issue is propelled by unsustainable agricultural practices,

deforestation, and the encroachment of urban development, imperiling the long-term productivity of

arable land and, by extension, the quality and quantity of food output. Compounding these woes is the
lamentable state of agricultural infrastructure. Inadequate transportation networks, a need for cold

storage facilities, and restricted market access collectively conspire to impede the efficient distribution of

agricultural goods. This logistical quagmire not only fosters food wastage but also deprives farmers of

crucial income-generating opportunities as they grapple with the complexities of connecting their

produce to consumers. Moreover, access to credit remains an onerous challenge for small-scale

farmers, limiting their capacity to invest in modern equipment and innovative farming methodologies that

hold the potential to amplify productivity and enhance their resilience in the face of climate change-

induced adversities. Speaking of climate change, it introduces an additional stratum of intricacy to the

agricultural landscape, with the Philippines standing as a particularly vulnerable entity. The specter of

more frequent and intensified weather-related events looms, capable of wreaking havoc on crops,

depleting soil quality, and displacing farming communities, thereby compounding the litany of hurdles

confronting the local agricultural sector.

Food security transcends mere quantity; it revolves around the pivotal notion of sovereignty over

one's food supply. In the context of the Philippines, the decision to curtail international imports and

invigorate the domestic agricultural sector assumes not just a policy prerogative but an existential

imperative. The act of restricting international imports lays the foundation for achieving food sovereignty.

It serves as a bastion against the caprices of the global marketplace, endowing the nation with the

authority to shape its food destiny. Food sovereignty, in essence, represents a nation's ability to craft its

food policies and production methods, ensuring that the food system remains attuned to the welfare of

its citizens (San Diego Foundation, 2022). A nation that leans heavily on international imports finds itself

at the mercy of global market vagaries. Abrupt surges in international food prices can trigger supply

disruptions, rendering sustenance less affordable for the average Filipino.

Global migration plays a huge role in this, which has intensified in recent years, has caused wages and

prices to become less sensitive to domestic demand shifts. These apply to the Philippines’ exports or

imports, which have become less concentrated (concentration index declined from 0.36 in 1995 to 0.29
in 2016, with 1 as highly concentrated) and the country has also reduced its divergence from world trade

patterns (diversification index dropped from 0.62 in 1995 to 0.56 in 2016, with 1 as greatly divergent)

(Guinigundo, 2018). By buttressing the local agricultural sector, the Philippines can wrest back

command over its food supply, insulating itself from the capriciousness of the world market. It's crucial to

underline that this isn't a call for isolationism but rather a quest for equilibrium between international

trade and the imperative of domestic food security. Empowering the local agricultural sector emerges as

the linchpin of a robust and sustainable food supply. This transformation involves multifaceted

investments in infrastructure, research, and development and facilitating enhanced access to credit for

local farmers. Investment in infrastructure emerges as a transformative agent, ameliorating the efficiency

of agricultural endeavors. Enhanced transportation networks, upgraded storage facilities, and more

effective irrigation systems can curtail post-harvest losses and optimize the overall supply chain.

Simultaneously, research and development hold the promise of ushering in innovative farming

techniques and crop varieties tailored to local conditions, amplifying agricultural productivity. Facilitating

easier access to credit stands as a vital boon for small-scale farmers who frequently grapple with

financial constraints impeding their journey toward modernizing farming practices. Credit accessibility

empowers them to acquire enhanced equipment, embrace sustainable agricultural methods, and expand

their agribusiness ventures. The ripple effects of such support are profound, resonating not only with

individual farmers but also bolstering the overarching resilience of the agricultural sector. Moreover, a

pronounced focus on the local agricultural sector fosters sustainable farming practices, ushering in a

diminished carbon footprint attributable to the international transportation of goods. Sustainable

agricultural paradigms advocate responsible land utilization, a reduction in chemical inputs, and the

mitigation of farming's environmental toll. The carbon footprint linked to goods imports is undeniably

weighty, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and concomitant climate perturbations. By

championing local agriculture, the Philippines can mitigate its dependence on international

transportation, thereby curbing its ecological imprint. Sustainable farming practices also beget healthier

soil, wiser water management, and the preservation of biodiversity, assuring forthcoming generations of

the resources requisite for food production.

 Embracing a policy that restrains international imports while fortifying the local agricultural sector

is not devoid of its share of complexities. Nevertheless, these challenges, when met with thoughtful

strategies, can be navigated to chart a path toward a more robust and secure future. One significant

obstacle lies in the diplomatic and economic implications of such a policy shift. The Philippines may

have longstanding trade agreements with various nations, and the government must tread cautiously in

these negotiations. It's imperative to be aware of the potential repercussions and meticulously weigh the

advantages against the disadvantages of restricting imports. Striking a balance between safeguarding

domestic food security and upholding diplomatic and economic relationships is essential. Nevertheless,

it's crucial to underscore that our utmost priority should always be the welfare of the Filipino populace.

Diplomatic and economic considerations should not come at the expense of the nation's food security.

While international trade offers undeniable benefits, it should uphold the resilience of the local food

supply chain. Therefore, initiatives to restrict international imports should be accompanied by policies

that facilitate gradual transitions, forestalling immediate food shortages and shielding the most

vulnerable segments of the population. It's vital to recognize that abrupt disruptions can carry dire

consequences, particularly for low-income households, which are the most susceptible. To mitigate

these short-term disruptions, the government must execute a well-conceived plan. This plan should

encompass mechanisms for the phased reduction of imports, ensure the availability of ample stockpiles

of essential commodities, and provide substantial support to farmers during the transition phase. The

simultaneous focus on stimulating local agriculture and bolstering domestic production should be

complemented by strategic stockpiling and the methodical distribution of essential food items. In addition

to these measures, the introduction of social safety nets, such as subsidized food programs targeting

vulnerable populations, is pivotal during the transitional phase. These safety nets serve a dual purpose:

they guarantee that the most disadvantaged citizens maintain access to food, and they offer a cushion to

absorb initial supply disruptions.

 In conclusion, the Philippines is at a critical juncture in its history and must make a choice that will
have a tremendous impact on the country's destiny. The government's unwavering commitment to the
welfare of the people of the country is exemplified by the strategic imperative of reducing imports while
bolstering the domestic agricultural sector. This need goes beyond simple policy. This stance
unequivocally asserts that the best interests of the nation, which encompass both its collective identity
and the well-being of its citizens, hinge on securing food sovereignty, nurturing local self-reliance, and
upholding the tenets of sustainability. These are not fanciful ideals but the pragmatic imperatives of a
nation steeped in a rich agricultural heritage. By taking this firm stance, the government sends a clear
statement that it is dedicated to safeguarding the country's food security, encouraging local self-
sufficiency, and charting a sustainable road for a more promising and secure future. According to the
administration, the people of the Philippines legitimately deserve nothing less than the decisive actions
necessary to guarantee their prosperity and well-being. While the road ahead undoubtedly presents its
share of challenges, these challenges are the crucible in which resilience is forged. Navigating the
complexities of diplomacy and economics necessitates wisdom, always guided by the principle that the
welfare of the Filipino people remains paramount. Mitigating short-term disruptions through meticulous
planning ensures that no segment of society is left behind in the transition to a more secure and resilient
food future. The Philippines stands as an outstanding exemplar, capable of inspiring not just its
inhabitants but also the larger world community, thanks to its unwavering commitment to food
sovereignty, local empowerment, and environmental sustainability. The government, farmers,
businesses, and residents are all invited to join forces in this quest to safeguard the future of the country
and, consequently, the welfare of its citizens. Together, they can create a country that not only has
access to enough food but also stands out for its resilience, independence, and sustainability. For now,
the fact still remains that our food supply, especially agricultural products, produced locally are not
sufficient for the growing population of our country, there is no choice but for our government to import
the necessary amount of products that could serve the present and the future needs of the people. For
the time being, the government's best option for ensuring that the needs of the populace are met while
simultaneously preserving the livelihood of local farmers is to restrict importation and support local
agriculture as a complementary strategy for food security. The government should keep in mind to
balance the needs of the consumer and the producer. Through their support and assistance especially
after the country is hit with typhoons and disasters will greatly boost the morale of the local producer and
make sure that there is a government, they could turn to be able to continue producing agricultural
needs of the country. The policies and government projects should be continuously examined, improved,
and kept up-to-date so that the government's goal of ensuring food security emphasizes not only the
availability of food but also its accessibility, nutritional value, and affordability, particularly for the most
vulnerable members of the population who are unable to afford to buy a large amount of food for their
family due to limited income. Every nation strives for food security, but what we should actually aim is to
secure food by boosting our local agriculture and someday to lessen and avoid depending on other
country for every shortage, ultimately we need to be able to be independent and self-sufficient so that
the definition of food security for the people could ensure not only in the present but for the future
generation as well.
References:

Angeles-Agdeppa, I., Javier, C. A., Duante, C. A., & Maniego, M. L. V. (2022, June).

Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on household food security and access to Social

Protection Programs in the Philippines: Findings from A Telephone Rapid Nutrition

Assessment Survey. Food and nutrition bulletin.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8883167/#:~:text=In%20a%20survey%20done%20by,a

%20meal%20in%20a%20week.

Guinigundo. (2018). The globalisation experience and its challenges for the Philippine economy. The

globalisation experience and its challenges for the Philippine economy1.

https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap100_q.pdf

International Trade Administration. (2022). Philippines - agricultural sectors. International

Trade Administration | Trade.gov.

https://www.trade.gov/country-commercial-guides/philippines-agricultural-sectors

Lamentillo, A. (2022). Climate Change and Food Security. Manila Bulletin.

https://mb.com.ph/2022/06/03/climate-change-and-food-security/

National Geographic. (2023). Food. Education.

 https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/food/

Pawlak, K., & Kołodziejczak, M. (2020, July 7). The role of agriculture in ensuring food

security in developing countries: Considerations in the context of the problem of

sustainable food production. MDPI. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/13/5488

San Diego Foundation. (2022, April 11). What is food sovereignty? https://www.sdfoundation.org/news-

events/sdf-news/what-is-food-sovereignty/#:~:text=The%20Importance%20of%20Food

%20Sovereignty&text=The%20idea%20also%20supports%20localized,the%20integrity%20of

%20their%20food.

Sunderland, T. C. H. (2011, September 1). Food security: Why is biodiversity important?.

Latest TOC RSS.

https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2011/00000013/00000003/art00002