Haseeb Waqas
Haseeb Waqas
Haseeb Waqas
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Page 1
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 2
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
Haseeb Waqas Sugar Mills Limited (HWSML), one of the largest white refined sugar
manufacturers in Pakistan, intends to establish a Sugar Manufacturing Unit at Maoza Jugmull,
Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. M/S Ecogreen Company (Pvt) Ltd., have been engaged
for conducting Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) of the project.
The main objectives of this EIA are to establish baseline environmental conditions, identify
potential impacts and suggest suitable mitigation measures for the execution of the proposed
project. This study has been accomplished in line with the provisions – guidelines and
directives of Punjab Environmental Protection Agency.
This executive summary presents an overview of the main findings of the EIA report for the
aforesaid project i-e Sugar Mill.
PROPONENT:
Mr. Abdullah Ilyas,, Director HWSML is the proponent for the aforesaid proposed project.
Haseeb Waqas group is working since 1992. The Haseeb Waqas group is the market leader in
the sugar industry with bench marks that conform to international standards. The achievement
of the group has enabled it to firmly assert itself as a large industry conglomerate.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The HWSML is planning to establish a 8000-10000 TCD (tonnes sugar cane crushed per day)
capacity sugar mill at Maoza Jugmull, Tehsil Jatoi, District Muzaffargarh. The whole sugar
mill unit will have an area of 576 Kanals. The covered area for the project is 76 Kanals. The
total estimated cost for the project is approx PKR 3.8 billion.
Page 3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
The proposed project is justified by the vision and mission of Haseeb Waqas Group to
encourage and promote industrialization in the county. The total manpower required for the
sugar mill will be about 794 workers whose number will progressively increase as the factory
gains momentum and becomes fully operational. Eventually, the factory operations are
expected to support the livelihoods of approximately more than 50,000 people comprising of;
farmers and their families, farm laborers, traders, tractor and vehicle operators which will then
support the overall economic development vision of Country and the wider region.
Page 4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 5
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 6
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
LIST OF ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE V: GLOSSARY
LIST OF SUPPLEMENTS:
Page 7
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page 8
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 9
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 10
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
LIST OF FIGURES
Page 11
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
LIST OF TABLES
Page 12
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
1 CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 GENERAL
The world's largest consumers of sugar are India, China, Brazil, USA, Russia, Mexico,
Pakistan, Indonesia, Germany and Egypt. Brazil & India are the largest sugar producing
countries followed by China, USA, Thailand, Australia, Mexico, Pakistan, France and
Germany. Global sugar production increased from approximately 125.88 MMT (Million
Metric Tons) in 1995-1996 to 149.4 MMT in 2002-2003 and then declined to 143.7 MMT
in 2003-2004, whereas consumption increased steadily from 118.1 MMT in 1995-1996 to
142.8 MMT in 2003-2004. The world consumption is projected to grow to 160.7 MMT in
2010 and 176.1 MMT by 2015.
Reference: Draft EIA Report for M/s. Shivashakti Sugars Limited
The sugar industry in Pakistan is the second largest agro based industry after Textiles.
Pakistan is an important cane producing country and is ranked fifth in world cane acreage
and 9th in sugar production. The share of sugar industry in value added of agriculture and
GDP are 3.2 percent and 0.7 percent respectively. The sugar sector constitutes 4.2 percent
of manufacturing. It employs over 1.5 million people, including management experts,
technologists, engineers, and financial experts, skilled, semiskilled and unskilled workers.
Pakistan’s 2012-13 (Oct-Sep) sugar production is estimated at a 4.7 million metric tonnes
in addition to 1.3 million metric tonnes of beginning stocks, making for a total 2012-2013
sugar supply of around 6.0 million metric tonnes.
The sugarcane production is reported at 62.5 million metric tonnes against the target of
59 million metric tonnes set by Pakistan Sugar Mills Association. This is 5.9% higher
than the 2011-12 produce of 58.4 million metric tonnes. The detailed break-up of the
sugar produced in 2011-12 is shown below in the table.
Page 13
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Table 1: Sugar Production 2015-16
Punjab is the highest producer of sugar with production of 3.1 million metric tonnes
approx, followed by Sindh with total production of 1.25 million metric tonnes. KPK lags
behind considerably with production of around 287,000 tonnes. The province wise
production is summarized below in table.
The sugar consumption for the year 2012-13 is estimated to be around 4.4 million metric
tonnes. Total consumption of sugar over the years is increasing mainly due to growing
demand by the processed food sector. Bulk sugar consumers such as bakeries, candy, ice
cream and soft drink manufacturers account for about 60 percent of the total sugar
demand. The sugar consumption in 2011-12 was 4.385 million metric tonnes as
compared to 4.096 million metric tonnes in 2010-11. The average monthly consumption
Page 14
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
in 2011-12 was hence 365,688 tonnes, as compared to 341,367 tonnes in 2010-11. The
yearly trend is shown below in the figure.
The kg per capita consumption in 2011-12 was 24.57, as compared to 23.12 in 2010-11.
The yearly trend in the export of sugar (fiscal year wise) is tabulated as follow:
Page 15
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Reference: Overview of Sugar Industry in Pakistan, June 2013
As per PEPA 2012 and the IEE/EIA Regulations, 2000 it is mandatory for the proponent
of any development project to obtain Environmental Approval from EPA Punjab by filing
an IEE or EIA as the case may be, before the Agency. This Report presents the
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for this proposed Project. For this purpose, the
proponent has engaged environmental consultants, M/s Ecogreen Company (Pvt.) Ltd.
The purpose of this study is to identify the environmental baseline i.e. physical, biological
and socio-economic/cultural conditions and assess all possible impacts arising during the
construction and operation phase of the project with the aim to find out appropriate
measures for their mitigation, to either eliminate those impacts or to bring them to
acceptable level and formulate Environmental Management Plan (EMP) for
implementation of the project in environment-friendly manner.
The report provides relevant information, as required under the officially approved
format, to facilitate the decision makers i.e. EPA Punjab for the issuance of
Environmental Approval.
Page 16
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Study Team:
Page 17
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 18
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
2.1 GENERAL
This section of the study concentrates on details of the project and its salient features;
such as location, site layout, objectives, selection of alternatives, cost and magnitude of
operation and various phases. Inputs and discharges relevant to different phases of the
project, such as electricity & materials, etc. have also been examined as a response to
possible environmental concerns.
2.4 ALTERNATIVES
Page 19
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
time and is going to be brought into industrial use which will be beneficial for the locals
as they will get jobs. The site is well located in regard to the following:
Page 20
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 21
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Juice extraction by milling is the process of squeezing the juice from the cane under a set mills
using high pressure between heavy iron rollers. Those mills can have from 3 up to 6 rolls; every
set of mills are called tandem mill or mill train. For improve the milling extraction efficiency,
imbibition water is added at each mill. Hot water is poured over the cane just before it enters
the last mill in the milling train and is recirculated up to the reach the first mill.
Sugarcane diffusion is the process of extracting the sucrose from the cane with the use of
imbibtion but without the squeezing by mills. Shredded cane is introduced into the diffuser at
the feed end, Hot water is poured over the shredded cane just before the discharge end of the
diffuser.
With milling process, the bagasse obtained does not require subsequent drying; however the
diffusion process leaves the fibre completely saturated with water and to extract this water, a
powerful mill is required in addition to the diffusion apparatus. By diffusion process, the
crushed cane become powdery, and their fuel-value is very inferior to that of the bagasse
obtained by direct milling, so that supplementary fuel (wood or coal) becomes necessary.
The diffusion process is a continuous one hence should be carried out day and night. The
quantity of cane treated by diffusion in 24 hours is strictly limited by the number and capacity
of the diffusers. The milling process is more adaptable, because the rollers can be adjusted to
admit more cane per day.
Diffusion gives a lower starch with reduced purity and about 25% more colour. Diffusion is
more sensitive to trash and gives around 6% more bagasse since all bagacillo is retained in the
extraction unit.
Juice heating is fundamental for diffusion in order to eliminate microorganisms and to promote
rate of extraction; for this reason there is a slight overall increase in the process steam demand
for diffusion.
Considering above advantages of milling over diffusion process for juice extraction, milling
technology alternative is adopted.
Page 22
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
White granular sugars can be undertaken using either the open pan (OP) or vacuum pan (VP)
processes. The major difference between the VP and OPS technology is the method of
evaporating or boiling the juice. In open pan process, the boiling operation uses cascade type
furnaces of various configurations. The massecuite is removed from the final boiling pan at
about 84ºBrix, at a temperature of around 112ºC. Whereas in vacuum pan process, the juice is
boiled under vacuum, to about 70º Brix, inside closed vessels or 'effects'. Low pressure steam is
used to boil the juice which circulates through tubes within a closed vessel. The vapor driven
off passes into a second similar vessel and it is used to heat more juice. In order to maintain
suitable temperature differentials for heat transfer to occur, a partial vacuum is applied to each
vessel, effectively lowering the boiling temperature of the juice. This system is capital-
intensive but is highly energy efficient and more importantly boils the juice at progressively
lower temperatures from 103 to 50ºC, reducing the effects of inversion, minimizing
discoloration and enhancing the formation of sugar crystals. In OP technology, juice is boiled
in open pan furnaces with little control over sugar losses due to inversion caused by boiling the
juice at higher temperatures and for longer periods. The VP technology is energy self sufficient
while OP needs additional fuel.
In VP Technology of insoluble materials and some undesirable dissolved substances from the
juice is done with liming, sulphitation or carbonation in continuous clarifiers. In OP, usually
batch clarification is done in open pans with vegetable bark extracts and manual skimming of
the scum. Better clarification is achieved with VP than OP as purer juice is obtained with VP.
Particulars Details
Latitude 29026’35.6429”N
Longitude 70052’52.94284”E
Location Maoza Jugmull, Tehsil Jatoi, District
Page 23
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Muzaffargarh
Tehsil Jatoi
District Muzaffargarh
Elevation above sea level 343ft
Nature of area Agricultural
Road connectivity Alipur Jatoi Road
Archeological or historical site No archeological site was found within 2-3km
radius
Page 24
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 25
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 26
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 27
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 28
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 29
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
The sugar cane in the field is examined for its quality before harvesting and harvesting permits
are given after its quality and maturity is found satisfactory. The sugar cane is then manually
harvested and transported to factory by tractor trailers, trucks and bullock carts. The vehicles
bringing sugar cane are received at the factory cane yard. Sugar cane in said project will be
purchased locally.
Page 30
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Sugarcane Weighing:
The vehicles carrying the sugar cane are weighed on the platform type electronic weighbridges
and released for unloading. The gross weight is recorded and printed. After unloading the
vehicles are once again weighed for the tare weight. These weights are printed on the
weighment slips, which also carry the details of the farmer, cane etc.
Sugarcane Unloading:
The cart cane is manually unloaded directly to the cane carrier. The cane from the trucks and
tractor- trailers are unloaded with the help of cane un-loader crane. The cane is unloaded on to
the feeder table of 100ton each.
Sugarcane Conveying:
The cane from the feeder table is then dumped to the main cane carrier, which conveys the cane
to the cane preparatory devices. Electronic devices, depending on the cane-crushing rate control
the speed of the cane carrier, and level in the cane carrier etc.
Sugarcane preparation:
The sugar cane is passed through the cane preparatory devices called leveler, cutter and
shredder where in the cane is cut into small pieces to expose the juice cells for extraction.
Page 31
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Milling:
The prepared cane then passes through the milling tandem having 3 roller mills necessary
feeding device. The milling train continues to extract the maximum sucrose from the prepared
cane with addition of hot water spray in last two mill which is called compound imbibition
system. The cane is conveyed between mills with the help of mechanical conveyors. Screens
then filter the extracted juice and filtered juice is pumped for further processing. The fibrous
residue after juice extraction known as bagasse is withdrawn and conveyed through baggase
conveyors to boiler for steam generation. Surplus bagasse is withdrawn from the conveyor and
stored for reuse when necessary. This baggase may be used as substrate of chip board plant and
number of other industrial purposes. The bagasse conveyor also has return conveyor to feed the
stored bagasse.
Juice clarification:
The mixed juice received from milling after filtration is weighed in a juice weighing scale or by
a mass flow meter to know the quantity of juice flowing. The juice contains certain undesirable
impurities, which are removed before it is taken for concentration in evaporators. The juice is
first heated to a temperature of 65-70°C. The hot juice is then mixed with lime to increase pH
upto 7.5-8.0. The treated juice is again heated to a temperature of 104-105°C .The heated juice
is then sent to a gravity settler known as clarifier wherein it stays for 45min so that mud
agglomerate to form flocs and settles.
The mud settled at bottom of clarifier is withdrawn continuously and is mixed with baggase to
form fine baggasalo. Then it is filtered in a rotary vacuum filter. The filtered mud after
removing residual juice in the filter is scraped from the filter drum and sent out. The filtrate
juice is returned to the raw juice tank and re-circulated. The mud is used as bio-fertilizer and
cattle feed.
Evaporation:
The clear juice will then be concentrated into syrup by boiling using steam in a process called
evaporation. The main aim of this is water removal by multiple effect evaporation. Multiple
effect evaporation is the scheme where the juice is boiled in series 4 or 5 vessels, with the
steam being fed to vessel 1 only. The vapour from vessel 1 will boil the juice in vessel 2 and
the vapour from 2 will boil the juice in 3, and so on until vapour from the final vessel goes to
Page 32
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
waste and the sugar is crystallized in vacuum pans. The clear juice gets concentrated from a
brix of 15 to 65 after passing through multiple effect evaporators.
Page 33
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
The sugar is then sent to sugar storage bins with the help of bucket elevators. The storage
capacity of these storage bins is enough to store 24 hours production. The sugar is discharged
from bins to fill 50kg bags and weighed automatically by electronic type automatic weighing
machines. The sugar bags are transported to warehouse through belt conveyors. The quantity of
sugar produced by a 10000 TCD plant shall be 33000 MT per month at 11% recovery on cane.
Page 34
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Lagoon # 1 07’x42’x67’
Lagoon # 2 07’x42’x50’
Lagoon#3 07’x25’x51’
Page 35
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Lagoon # 4 07’x22’x114’
Lagoon # 5 07’x42’x50’
Combined Holding Capacity = 76000 m³
2.15 By-product
Molasses will constitute the final effluent obtained on the preparation of sugar by
repeated crystallization and will be in the form of non-useable molasses (blackstrap) or as
edible syrup for industrial use. The non-useable molasses (blackstrap) will be used as
animal feed additive. In the latter stages, the molasses may also be used to produce
ethanol, compressed yeast, citric acid and run through the establishment of a distillery in
the factory. But at present the molasses will be stored in storage ponds and will be sold
out.
Page 36
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
2.16 MANPOWER
The factory workforce requirements will include both permanent and casual workers.
Total number of workers will be 794. During off-season, number of workers will be 300.
Complete workers strength is annexed.
Page 37
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 38
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 39
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
10
11
12
13
14
15
Page 40
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
16.1 GENERAL
This section describes the baseline conditions, which cover the existing physical,
ecological, and socio-economic environment of the Project Area. Information on these
aspects has been derived from the desk study of available data, field visits to the project
area as well as information obtained through visits to the Government departments and
other relevant agencies.
16.2.1 TOPOGRAPHY
The topography of the project area is almost flat with no noticeable variation in the
surface elevation. At the proposed Project site, a surface elevation is about 334 feet. The
project area mainly consists of agricultural plains and cultivable fields. The site area
adjacent to Muzaffargarh Canal is waterlogged. The water-logging effect gradually
decreases while moving away from MC. Proposed site is located approx at a distance of
30km from site.
Page 41
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Eurasian and Indo-Pakistan Plates. Within this interface area there are many faults
reflecting the complex nature of the plate tectonics.
According to Building Code of Pakistan, the proposed project site lies within Zone 2A (a
zone of moderate seismic activity).
Page 42
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 43
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Under the normal conditions, MC closure period is 1.5 month during January / February
each year. The discharges of Muzaffargarh Canal vary from 5280 ft3/s to 205 ft3/s in
summer, 4315 ft3/s to 115 ft3/s in winter and 7700 ft3/s to 330 ft3/s in monsoon season.
In the project area, large amount of water percolates into ground because of seepage from
Muzaffargarh Canal. Groundwater table is mostly shallow (about 5-10 m). Local communities
mostly rely on groundwater for drinking and household purposes (washing and bathing).
People have installed hand pumps and electric motors to pump ground water. Groundwater
quality results at some locations of area are given below:
Page 44
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 45
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Reference: Environmental and Social Impact Assessment (ESIA), KAPCO 660 MW Coal-Fired Power Plant
16.3.2 CLIMATE
The climate of the project area is broadly described as hot and arid. May is month of highest
temperature (42°C) in Muzaffargarh during each year. June is the second hottest month in the
area where average temperature of 41.5°C is recorded. The lowest temperature (5.4°C) is
observed during the January each year. December is also very cold when temperature reaches
to 6°C. Mean monthly temperature data of project area is given below:
Page 46
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Rainfall is higher during the months of August and September which is 53.76 mm and 51.38
mm respectively, whereas; it is minimum during the months of November, December and
January, which is less than 1 mm.
Most of the time June, July and August are the months of maximum wind speed in project area
whereas from November to January, wind speed is minimum. June is the month of highest
wind speed in project area (8.26 km/h) whereas the minimum wind speed is recorded during the
month of January when wind speed reaches to 1.52 km/h.
Page 47
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Table 11: Mean Monthly Wind Speed (Km/h) in Project Area (2010-2014)
Table below shows the irregular pattern of relative humidity in project area. Highest value of
relative humidity (80%) is recorded during the month of January in 2010 whereas the lowest
relative humidity (28%) is recorded during the month of May 2013.
Weighted mean humidity patterns for during the five year period are presented in Figure below.
According to Figure, relative humidity in area is highest during the month of January whereas;
during the month of May, relative humidity is lowest in the area.
Page 48
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Table 13: Mean Monthly Relative Humidity (%) in Project Area (2010-2014)
Figure 19: Five Years (2010 to 2014) Weighted Mean Relative Humidity in project area
Page 49
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 50
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Table 14: Ambient air quality results
Page 51
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Figure 21: Hourly weighted Avg concentration of NO
Page 52
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 53
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 54
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Ambient air quality was monitored at site and results were as follows:
Sr. No Parameters Unit Concentration
1 CO ppm 0.6
2 SO2 µg/m3 5.2
3 NO2 µg/m3 20.6
4 PM10 µg/m3 41
5 PM2.5 µg/m3 12
6 SPM µg/m3 58
7 O3 Ppm 4
16.3.4 NOISE
The measured minimum, maximum and mean noise levels in nearby areas of project site were
42.7 dB (A), 50.2 dB (A) and 42.7 dB (A) respectively. These noise levels were well within
prescribed limits of national and international standards. The ambient noise levels in the nearby
areas of the proposed Project site are shown in Figure
Page 55
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Noise level observed at project site was 66.9 dB(A) which is within PEQs limits.
16.4.1 Flora
Amongst trees, the most important are Kikar (Acacia Arabica) Shisham or Tahli (Delbergia
sissoo), Beri (Zizyphus jujube), Toot (Morus alba), Sharin (Albizzia lebbek), Dherek (Melia
azeharach), Phulai (Acacia modesta), Pipal (Ficus religiosa) and Bohr (Ficus bengalansis) are
planted for shade. The growth in Rakhs is composed mainly of three kind of trees, Jand
(Prosopis spicigera), Karir (Capparis aphylla), and Wan (Salvadora oleoides). Occasionally
Rero (Acacia ieucophhloea) and Farash (Tamarix articulata) are also found. Pilchhi (Tamarix
dioica) is found on moist sandy soil along the river and is used for wicker work, basket making
etc. There is wild growth of Mesquite bushes and some Eucalyptus trees in the areas along the
canals, roads and barren land but natural forest cover has been significantly reduced in the past.
The fruit trees of project area include citrus fruits, mango, guava and date palm.
The main crops during Rabi are wheat, gram, rape, mustard, barley and oil seeds. In Kharif,
cotton, jawar, sugarcane, bajra, maize and rice are grown. In addition, there are subsidiary
crops known as Zaid Rabi like Kharbooza, tobacco and potatoes and Zaid Kharif like potatoes
and chilies. The main fruits grown are mangoes, date palm, Malta, orange, water and musk
Page 56
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
melon, guava, citrus, falsa, jaman and pomegranate. In the beginning of the cultivation era the
inhabitants used to eat Pilu and Bair, the only wild fruits that grows intermittently. With the
introduction of canal irrigation Date palm and other fruits are being grown on commercial
basis. Wheat, cotton, sugarcane and rice are the major crops, whereas mango and citrus are the
major fruits of the area. As per cropping pattern, wheat, cotton and sugarcane are the highest
grown crops in the area. The vegetables are grown in abundance as the water and soils are
suitable for cultivation. Potato, carrot, lady finger, chilies, onion and cauliflowers are grown.
Bitter gourd, turmeric and garlic are grown to meet the public demand. Other vegetables i.e.
Radish, Tinda (apple gourd), Bringal is also grown.
Table below provides the detail of various floral species present in project area. The ecological
linkages of each species are also provided.
Page 57
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 58
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 59
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 60
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 61
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
16.4.2 Fauna
There is no wildlife except jackals, dogs and snakes etc. Common species of birds found in the
project area are sparrows, crows, pigeon, dove tiliar (starling), lal mena, parrot, quail, pintail,
and humming bird etc. River Indus and Ghazi Ghat Seasonal Lake are the source of freshwater
fishes in the project area. Some commercial fisheries operate in the project area.
Table below provides the detail of various fauna species present in the project area. The
ecological linkages of each species are also provided.
Page 62
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 63
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 64
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 65
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 66
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 67
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 68
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 69
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 70
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 71
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 72
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 73
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
16.5.1 DEMOGRAPHY
Average household size in the area is about six persons per household. Population density is
338 persons/ km2. The estimated population of the project area by gender is shown in Table.
The highest percentage of the total population is included in age group <18 (46.2%), with the
second highest percentage being the age group of 19-40 years (40.6%). Similar trends in
population distribution are also observed among male and female population. The percentage
distribution of population by age group is shown in Table.
Page 74
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Health facilities present near project site are New Malik surgical hospital and Sultan Surgical
and Gynae hospital.
Page 75
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 76
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Educational facilities present nearby project area are Al-Mubashir Public Secondary
school, Govt. post graduate college alipur, High aims girls secondary school, the
educators Punjab campus, allied school, the country school.
Page 77
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 78
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 79
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Water logging in area has severely affected the crop growth and average yield otherwise; area
has good agricultural potential. 100% of the population in project area is Muslim. Most of the
people (98%) belong to Sunni school of thought. The remaining people are either “Shias” or
“Ahl-e-Hadis” (locally called as “Wahabi”). Similar to rest of Southern Punjab, this area is also
influenced by feudalism. Feudal are big property owners and politically influential people.
Local people are mostly working on feudal agricultural lands for their livelihood and they have
to obey them. Majority of people in project area (about 95%) speak “Saraiki” language. This is
a dialect of Punjabi spoken in Southern Punjab. A small number of people also speaks other
languages such as Punjabi and Urdu. Electricity is available in entire project area. Ground
water is available in the area. Due to seepage from Muzaffargarh Canal, groundwater table is
shallow. People have installed hand pumps and electric pumps for ground water extraction.
Ground water has various quality issues, however only small numbers of people (about 8%)
treat their drinking water before using. Boiling of drinking water prior to use is common water
treatment method in the area. Government provided drinking water supply is not available in
the area. A government provided sewerage system is not available in the project area.
Therefore, people use self-constructed sewerage system. About 52% of households use pipe
sewerage, 26% use septic tanks and 22% use open ventilated pit latrine for collection of waste
water from toilets. Washing and bathing wastewater is openly released outside the houses. A
photograph of a sewerage system adjacent to a house in the project area is shown
Page 80
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 81
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 82
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
17.1 GENERAL
Any person, group or organization with an interest in the project or who can be affected
directly or indirectly, negatively or positively by the project activities is a project
stakeholder. Because of their interests and concerns, it is very important to take
stakeholders into confidence regarding the project need and impacts, and their
management. Stakeholder consultation is a mean of involving the entire primary and
secondary stakeholders in the project decision making process in order to address their
concern, improve project design and give the project legitimacy. Stakeholder
consultation, if conducted in a participatory and objective manner, is a mean of
enhancing the project stability.
• Promote better understanding of the project, its objectives and its likely impacts and
their management.
• Identify and address the concerns of all interested and affected parties of the project.
• Provide a mean to Identify and resolve issues before plans are finalized and
development commences, thus avoiding public anger, resentment and potentially costly
delays.
• Encourage transparency, and inculcate trust among various stakeholders to promote
cooperation and partnership with the communities and local leadership.
Page 83
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
The main document for distribution to stakeholders during the consultations was Social
Impact Assessment Interview Schedule. The filled Survey forms of stakeholders are
annexed (Annexure VI).
The community consultations were conducted with the community members outside their
settlements to encourage and facilitate their participation. Photographic record of the
consultations with the men from the communities is presented below. Consultation was
done for 3 days from 6th of June to 8th of June 2017. People were consulted and their
views were recorded in form of survey forms and presented in table below:
• An overview of the Project and EIA process was provided to the community
representatives.
• Members of the communities were given the opportunity to raise queries or
concerns regarding the Project.
• Queries were responded to and concerns were documented.
• The consultation process was carried out in Urdu and Punjabi language.
Page 84
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Out of total respondents, 89% knew about the project whereas 11% were not aware of the
project planning and implementation. All people were then briefed about the project.
Page 85
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
84% of interviewee commented their views about the project and 16% didn’t respond.
16%
84%
Page 86
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Project Acceptance
100%
Page 87
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
• The project will provide raw materials for other industrial Plants e.g., those
manufacturing industrial spirits.
• The project will produce sugar for domestic use hence saving the foreign
exchange that could be used for its importation.
• On many occasions children are employed on sugar cane farms. This is not only
against the law but also denies children to attend school.
• The widespread use of fertilizers and herbicides on the sugar farms, there will be
water pollution in the streams and rivers.
• Youth unemployment is high in the area.
• The cost of transporting sugar cane is borne by the farmer.
• Poor management of sugar factories. This leads to delayed and low payments to
the farmers which may lower their morale.
Page 88
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 89
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 90
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 91
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 92
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 93
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 94
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 95
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
18.1 GENERAL
This section discusses the project’s potential environmental impact on the area’s
geomorphology, soil, water resources, air, biological resources and socioeconomic
condition and, where applicable, identifies mitigation measures that will reduce, if not
eliminate, its adverse impact. The assessment carried out in this section is based on
potential impacts on overall environmental receptors within the project area.
18.2 OBJECTIVES
Objectives of screening all possible impacts and then providing their mitigation
measures are:
Page 96
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
-1 -1 -1 -1 0 -1 -2 -2 0 0 +2 -1
-2 -2 -1 -1 0 -2 0 0 0 0 +2 -2
Key : 1 = Minor Impacts are defined as Less significant adverse impacts that may be easily prevented or mitigated
2 = Moderate Impacts are considered as likely to have adverse environmental impacts
3 = Major Impacts are defined as significant, or irreversible adverse impact
0 = This category serves no impacts from project
Page 97
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
The design, if maintained and operated in sustainable manner, is expected to cast positive
impact on the social environment and will impose adverse impact on the environment which
can be mitigated or reduced upto acceptable level by adopting best management practices.
Mitigation Measures
The Proponent intends to construct the unit on modern lines with incorporation of latest
technology which will not cause any significant impact on environment. Wastage of water will
be avoided. All the waste material will be tried to use as raw material i-e baggase as fuel of
boiler, wastewater in sugarcane fields etc. Moreover, the buildings will be designed by keeping
in consideration all the technical standards to avoid adverse impacts on the environment and
society.
Page 98
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
• The proponent will be required to instruct and train their workforce in the storage and
handling of materials that can potentially cause soil contamination.
• Solid waste generated during construction will be properly and safely disposed of as per
practices of area.
Page 99
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
• Construction activities causing dust should not be carried out on excessively windy days
• Construction workers will be provided with masks for protection against the inhalation
of dust and they should be trained for its use
• Vehicle speed should be controlled within the limit
• Emission of exhaust gases from vehicles used for construction should be controlled
• Selection of up to date and well maintained plant or equipment with reduced noise
levels ensured by suitable in built damping techniques or with appropriate muffling
devices
• Confining noisy work to normal working hours in the day, wherever possible
Page 100
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
• Providing the construction workers with suitable hearing protection like ear cap, or
earmuffs and training them in its use
• Restricting construction vehicle movements during nighttime
• Use of low noise machinery, or machinery with noise shielding and absorption are the
mitigation measures suggested for said project
Page 101
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Vehicles used for transportation of sugar cane as well as finished product would be bullock
cart, tractors and trucks and the utility vehicles used would be buses, jeeps, cars and
ambulances. HWSML needs to regularly carry out checks of all motor driven vehicles and
carry out regular servicing and maintenance of it in order to keep the environmental impact on
account of their exhaust emissions to its minimum level. For reducing fugitive dust, regular
water sprinkling on Kachha roads will be done. All trucks proposed to be used for
transportation will be covered with tarpaulin, maintained and optimally loaded. Moreover, the
garden development and tree plantation activities of HWSML during operational phase would
ensure minimal impact of fugitive dust emissions.
Page 102
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
reducing the noise. In case of maintenance, the persons working near the steam turbine
generator building will be provided with ear muffs.
A thick greenbelt will be developed all around the plant which will be acting as noise barrier.
In general the following methods will be adopted to control the noise pollution from the
proposed units;
• The use of concrete and masonry walls & barriers keeping in view the benefits of
stiffness weight & cavity construction & the need to provide well sealed sound
attenuating doors & windows.
• The use of complete or partial enclosures.
• Attenuation by use of sound absorbents on walls and fixed or suspended ceilings
• Introduction of control and monitoring rooms having good sound insulation properties.
• The use of mufflers, sound attenuation and acoustic louvers in air flow paths, taking
particular care to direct inlet and discharge an opening away from critical areas
wherever possible, so as to take advantage of direct effects.
• All the workers will be provided with ear plugs, proper maintenance of blowers and
pumps. All the transporters will be advised to carry out regular maintenance of their
vehicles.
Page 103
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 104
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
19.1 GENERAL
This EIA provides the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) of the project to keep it
environment benign as well as the monitoring plan to ensure the compliance of the established
EMP.
Outline and key features of the EMP for operations phase is presented. As per the
environmental legislation in Pakistan, the EMP for the operations phase, along with other
documents, is to be submitted to the environmental protection agency to obtain confirmation for
compliance and Environmental Approval for project operation.
Even after implementation of the suggested mitigation measures, the impact may remain
significant, and require monitoring. This section also underlies the monitoring framework for
both construction and operation phases to check compliance of the EMP and to take timely
actions for correction in case any accidence of significant criteria, requirements or goals are
found.
Page 105
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Proponent: The project proponent will undertake overall responsibility for compliance with the
EMP. Concerned Departments will carry out verification checks to ensure that the contractors
are effectively implementing their environmental and social requirements.
Contractors: The contractors will implement the majority of environmental and social
mitigation measures. The contractors will carry out field activities as part of the project. The
contractors are subject to certain liabilities under the environmental laws of the country, and
under its contract with proponent.
• Management plan
• Monitoring Plan
• Communication and documentation
• Institutional capacity
• Environmental training
Page 106
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 107
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 108
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 109
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
solid waste management • Ensure that solid waste generated is regularly disposed
(SWM) in the sugar factory off appropriately
• HWSML is planning to re-use the bagasse which is the
residual woody fiber of the cane as fuel for boilers for
steam generation.
• The filter mud will be used for the production of dry
filter cake to be used as a fertilizer or cattle feed. The
filter cake will be distributed to the sugar cane farmers
for recycling.
• Non-biodegradable and recyclable matter, such as
containers, waste papers, used materials, waste
packaging materials, will be sold to local contractors
for recycling or reuse purpose.
Wastewater • Wastewater generated will be naturally treated in 5 HWSML Throughout
lagoons over an area of 4 acre. Oil skimmer is also project life cycle
installed in the main drain for trapping of oil and
grease. After treatment, wastewater will be discharged
in sugarcane fields owned by proponent (these fields
will be grown by proponent in future nearby project
site).
• Condensate water is used for imbibitions and sugar
manufacturing process.
• Boundary walls are made around the massecuite and
molasses pumps to collect the leakage of sugar
solution. In this way, leaky sugar solutions are
reprocessed.
Air quality and dust management
To minimize air pollution due • Use of captive Bagasse from cane crushing as a fuel HWSML Throughout
to said project • Complete combustion, wet scrubbers, ash collection project life cycle
system, effective ash handling is the mitigation
Page 110
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 111
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 112
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Page 113
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Reading to be taken at 15
HWSML through
Noise levels on seconds interval for 15
Operation Digital Sound Meter PEQs Project site Quarterly approved
dB(A) scale minutes every hour and
monitoring lab
then Averaged.
Effluent flow,
Temperature, Wastewater HWSML through
Category B of As per approved
Waste water Operation COD, BOD, pH, Lab equipments discharge Quarterly approved
SMART rules standards method
pH, TSS, Oil & point monitoring lab
grease
Page 114
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Fire Fighting
All personnel Consultants Monthly
(Training/drill)
Page 115
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Approximately PKR 2 million budget will be reserved for the Environment. 1-1.2million
budget will be reserved for plantation and maintenance of trees/plants.
Page 116
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
20 CHAPTER 7: CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
20.1 Conclusion
The findings of the EIA based on the disclosed project details and the baseline site assessment
indicated that the project is desirable and will support the realization of national and county
development goals. The proposed project is justified by the vision and mission of HWSML to
encourage and promote industrialization in the county. The manpower required for the
proposed sugar mill will be about 794 workers whose number will increase as the factory gains
momentum. The sugar factory is expected to eventually benefit the livelihoods of more than
50,000 people comprising of farmers and their families, farm laborers, vehicle operators,
traders which will support the overall economic development in County and the wider region.
The EIA findings showed that the project design is the most suitable based on the current state
of environment and the available technology. The project is feasible and desirable within the
perspective of environmental and social economic evaluation undertaken in this study.
Therefore, the project is necessary, and should be implemented as soon as possible. The overall
benefits of the proposed development are far higher than the potential cost of the marginal
negative environmental changes which are likely to occur. The proposed project is desirable
because it will improve the socio-economic status for the people in the area. It will create
employment and deliver a wide range of other socioeconomic benefits.
The baseline environmental assessment of the proposed factory site indicated that the
environmental is already been under agricultural use and does not contain any sensitive
environment or endangered species. The EIA established that the proposed project design is by
far more suitable than the No project option. The stakeholder engagement and consultation
process also established that the local people were unanimously in support of the proposed
project.
20.2 Recommendation
In view of the findings of the EIA, the proposed project is considered as environmentally
sound. On the basis of these findings it is recommended that the proposal for the construction
of the proposed mill be approved based on the willingness by the proponent to implement the
proposed project in strict adherence to the Environmental Management Plan (EMP) and
Page 117
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EIA)
Environmental Monitoring Plan as provided in this report. On the basis of these findings, it is
recommended that the proposed construction should be provided Environmental Approval.
Page 118