Etasr 4162
Etasr 4162
Etasr 4162
Abstract-This paper presents a study on the compressive strength [10]. The compressive strength of concrete made from recycled
of concrete using recycled aggregates. The concrete was designed coarse aggregates was studied in [11], with consideration of the
to have a 25MPa compressive strength and an 8cm slump. The source of the recycled aggregates and the strength of the target
rates of replacing natural aggregates with recycled coarse were concrete. The toughness and soundness test results on the
0%, 10%, and 20%. The test samples were compressed to recycled coarse aggregates showed a higher percentage loss
determine their compressive strength value after 7, 14, and 28 than the natural, but it remained within the acceptable limits.
days of curing. The results showed that the concrete slump did The compressive and splitting tensile strengths of concrete with
not change effectively at a 10% replacement rate. When using recycled coarse aggregate depend on the mix proportions. In
20% recycled aggregates, the concrete was too hard and the
general, the strength of the recycled concrete can be 10-25%
homogeneity of the concrete mixture could not be guaranteed.
The compressive strength slightly decreased using 10% of
lower than the conventional made with natural coarse
recycled aggregates and decreased significantly using 20%.
aggregates.
Therefore, 20% of recycled aggregate replacement is not suitable. This paper presents a study on the compressive strength of
The results showed that using recycled aggregates at a rate of concrete having a partial replacement of natural with recycled
10% is optimal. coarse aggregates.
Keywords-compressive strength; recycled concrete; demolishing II. COMPOSITION OF RECYCLED CONCRETE
work
The concrete obtained after a project's demolition was
I. INTRODUCTION crushed and the resulting coarse aggregates were washed,
dried, and pre-screened to remove any dust particles. These raw
In recent years, developed countries deal with the recycling
and treatment of construction solid waste. Construction's solid aggregates were screened to classify the particles and then
mixed again to be graded as standard for concrete according to
waste treatment, solid waste minimization, pressure to change,
[12]. To avoid strongly absorbing recycled aggregates affecting
and the approach to resolving these issues in the UK were
the setting of the concrete, the coarse aggregates were soaked
studied in [1]. China faces a similar problem as the amount of
solid construction waste was more than 1.5 billion tons per year in water and then dried under normal conditions. In this study,
a natural concrete aggregate was selected as a reference. The
in 2018, and it was predicted to reach 2.5 billion per year in
coarse aggregate was replaced partially by solid waste from the
2020 [2]. The solid waste treatment in current construction
crushed demolition site. After casting according to the
sites, the life cycle of sustainable development, and the
evaluation of the environmental impact of the construction standard, the samples were stored under normal conditions and
tested for compressive strength after 7, 14, and 28 days.
materials consumed in China during 2000-2015 were studied in
[3]. Many studies have been conducted on recycled aggregates,
such as their use in green concrete [4, 5], coarse aggregates for
concrete [6], and fine concrete [7, 8]. While the reuse of
construction solid waste as aggregates for concrete has been
widely used and achieved remarkable efficiency, many studies
have been conducted recently on the mechanical properties of
concrete with recycled aggregates. The influence of the
recycled aggregates on the compressive strength of concrete
was studied in [9], concluding that they did not have a
significant influence on compressive, flexural, and tensile
strength. The use of recycled aggregates from demolished
works after crushing and grading, helps to save natural
Fig. 1. Recycled coarse aggregates
aggregate sources and protect the environment, was studied in
Corresponding author: Van Tien Phan
www.etasr.com Vu et al.: Study of the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Recycled Coarse …
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, 7191-7194 7192
The mechanical properties of the sand used in the No. Replacement rate Slump (mm)
experiment were: 1 0% 73
2 10% 70
• Density: 2.65g/cm3 3 20% 12
www.etasr.com Vu et al.: Study of the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Recycled Coarse …
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, 7191-7194 7193
different sizes from the standard samples (150×150×150mm). 13, 14]. The higher compressive strength of the concrete
For a cylinder sample having 150mm diameter and 300mm having a lower recycled aggregate replacement rate may be
height, α was calculated to 1.2. Table V shows the compressive attributed to the greater bonding force and strength when using
strengths of the experimental samples after 7, 14, and 28 days. the same type of aggregate. Figure 5 shows the strength
development of recycled concrete, which indicates that
TABLE IV. DESTRUCTIVE FORCE RESULTS concrete strength reached 51-67% after 7 days and about 63-
Sample destructive force 75% after 14 days of curing. Details are shown in Table VII.
Replacement rate of
No. (kN)
recycled aggregates (%)
7 days 14 days 28 days
1 0 185.55 231.94 309.25
2 0 196.30 199.47 316.61
3 0 200.32 239.73 328.39
4 10 195.36 224.52 291.58
5 10 186.26 228.32 300.41
6 10 176.80 240.82 304.83
7 20 130.95 178.79 251.82
8 20 135.02 173.24 254.76
9 20 126.93 161.77 248.87
www.etasr.com Vu et al.: Study of the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Recycled Coarse …
Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research Vol. 11, No. 3, 2021, 7191-7194 7194
• At 14 days of curing, the experimental concrete achieved [10] J. Junak and A. Sicakova, "Concrete Containing Recycled Concrete
about 70-75% of the maximum design strength. However, Aggregate with Modified Surface," Procedia Engineering, vol. 180, pp.
1284–1291, Jan. 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.290.
most of the concrete samples using 20% recycled aggregate
[11] S. W. Tabsh and A. S. Abdelfatah, "Influence of recycled concrete
had slightly lower strength than normal. aggregates on strength properties of concrete," Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 1163–1167, Feb. 2009,
IV. CONCLUSION https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.06.007.
This paper presents the results of a study on the [12] "About the coarse recycled aggregates for concrete," Vietnam,
compressive strength of concrete using recycled aggregate 11969:2018, 2018.
from demolition works. The concrete was designed to have [13] V. T. Phan, T. H. Nguyen, "The influence of fly ash on the compressive
strength of recycled concrete utilizing coarse aggregate from demolition
25MPa compressive strength and 8cm slump. The rates of works," Engineering, Technology and Applied Science Research, vol 11,
replacing natural aggregates with recycled coarse were 0%, no. 3, pp. 7107-7110, Jun. 2021.
10%, and 20%. The test samples were compressed to determine [14] A. A. Mohammed Ali, R. S. Zidan, and T. W. Ahmed, "Evaluation of
their compressive strength values at 7, 14, and 28 days of high-strength concrete made with recycled aggregate under effect of well
curing. The results showed that the concrete slump did not water," Case Studies in Construction Materials, vol. 12, Jun. 2020, Art.
change significantly at samples having 10% recycled no. e00338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00338.
aggregates. When using 20% recycled coarse aggregates, the
drop was markedly obvious. Thus, using 20% recycled
aggregate resulted in too hard concrete, while the homogeneity
of the concrete mixture could not be guaranteed. The
compressive strength decreased slightly when using 10%
recycled aggregates and significantly when using 20%.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the 20% replacement rate is
not appropriate. The results showed that using recycled
aggregates at a rate of 10% is an optimal solution.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Osmani, "Construction Waste Minimization in the UK: Current
Pressures for Change and Approaches," Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, vol. 40, pp. 37–40, Jan. 2012,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.158.
[2] "People’s Republic of China: Construction and Demolition Waste
Management and Recycling," AECOM Asia Company Limited, Shatin,
HK, TA-8906 PRC, Apr. 2018.
[3] J. Lei, B. Huang, and Y. Huang, "Chapter 6 - Life cycle thinking for
sustainable development in the building industry," in Life Cycle
Sustainability Assessment for Decision-Making, J. Ren and S. Toniolo,
Eds. Elsevier, 2020, pp. 125–138.
[4] V. Radonjanin, M. Malešev, S. Marinković, and A. E. S. Al Malty,
"Green recycled aggregate concrete," Construction and Building
Materials, vol. 47, pp. 1503–1511, Oct. 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.conbuildmat.2013.06.076.
[5] N. Jain, M. Garg, and A. K. Minocha, "Green Concrete from Sustainable
Recycled Coarse Aggregates: Mechanical and Durability Properties,"
Journal of Waste Management, vol. 2015, Feb. 2015, Art. no. e281043,
https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/281043.
[6] L. Butler, J. S. West, and S. L. Tighe, "Effect of recycled concrete
coarse aggregate from multiple sources on the hardened properties of
concrete with equivalent compressive strength," Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 47, pp. 1292–1301, Oct. 2013,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.074.
[7] R. Sri Ravindrarajah and C. T. Tam, "Recycling concrete as fine
aggregate in concrete," International Journal of Cement Composites and
Lightweight Concrete, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 235–241, Nov. 1987,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0262-5075(87)90007-8.
[8] L. Evangelista and J. de Brito, "Concrete with fine recycled aggregates:
a review," European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering,
vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 129–172, Feb. 2014, https://doi.org/10.1080/
19648189.2013.851038.
[9] J. Ahmad Bhat, "Effect of strength of parent concrete on the mechanical
properties of recycled aggregate concrete," Materials Today:
Proceedings, vol. 42, pp. 1462–1469, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.matpr.2021.01.310.
www.etasr.com Vu et al.: Study of the Compressive Strength of Concrete with Partial Replacement of Recycled Coarse …