Self Sufficiency
Self Sufficiency
Self Sufficiency
The pursuit of a just and dynamic social order, as mandated by the 1987 Philippine Constitution
(Article II, Section 9), resonates through various poverty mitigation measures initiated by the
government. Central to these efforts is the Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) program, commonly
known as the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4Ps), introduced in 2008. With a mission to free
families from poverty, the 4Ps, inspired by Latin American CCT schemes, has become a cornerstone
in the Philippines’ poverty reduction strategy. Over the years, it has grown exponentially, with
millions of household beneficiaries across administrations. Indeed, based on the data from the
Department of Social Welfare and Development (DSWD), as of June 2020, the 4Ps initiative
The institutionalization of the 4Ps through Republic Act No. 11310 underscores its role in
promoting human capital development and breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty with
dual objectives. Firstly, it provides social assistance by offering monetary support to extremely poor
families to address their immediate needs. Secondly, it aims at social development by investing in
the health and education of underprivileged children through programs, including health check-ups
for pregnant women and children aged 0 to 5, deworming initiatives for schoolchildren aged 6 to 14,
enrollment in daycare and schools, and family development sessions. Operational across all 17
regions in the Philippines, spanning 79 provinces, 143 cities, and 1,484 municipalities, the 4Ps
employs the National Household Targeting System for Poverty Reduction (NHTS-PR) to select
beneficiaries based on specific criteria. Eligibility involves residence in the poorest municipalities,
economic conditions below the provincial poverty threshold, households with children 0-18 years
old or pregnant women, and an agreement to meet program conditions. The program issues two
types of cash grants: a health grant of P500 per household monthly and an education grant of P300
per child monthly. Conditions for receiving these grants include adherence to health care practices
for pregnant women and children, attendance at family development sessions, regular health check-
ups and vaccines for children, deworming for school-age children, and consistent school enrollment
Similarly, Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) programs exist in some developing countries,
including Mexico and Egypt. Kugler and Rojas (2018) emphasized that Mexican CCT program has a
to better employment opportunities and higher-paying jobs. Takaful and Karama, implemented in
Egypt, target income support for the poor and most vulnerable, revealing positive shifts in asset
ownership, reduced debt burdens, and increased engagement in informal labor, contributing to the
In addition to the favorable impacts on the implementation of such programs for beneficiaries,
an array of issues then arises. According to Quimson (2020), 4Ps beneficiaries faced impediments,
particularly related to the geographical proximity of barangays to banking facilities for cash grant
withdrawals. Dulliyao (2019) delineates constraints such as the utilization of ATMs as collateral,
coupled with the acknowledgment that not all beneficiaries possess a comprehensive understanding
of the program’s conceptual framework. Once, Gabon, Dela Cruz, & Mustacisa-Lacaba (2019)
emphasize the financial literacy struggles of parent beneficiaries, specifically in the judicious
allocation of budgets for fundamental necessities such as sustenance, education, medical care, and
savings. Balacuit Jr. (2018) mentioned three preeminent challenges in 4Ps implementation: parent-
imposing a seven-year term limit on family beneficiaries. According to the Commission on Audit
(COA), 90% of the current 4.2 million beneficiaries in the 4Ps program, equivalent to 3,820,012
households, have remained below the poverty threshold despite being part of the program for 7 to
13 years. Discrepancies have been noted, including the government’s release of a list of graduated
The Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG) outlines that a 4Ps household
beneficiary becomes eligible to exit the Pantawid program when the last monitored child reaches 19
years old, completes high school, or after seven years in the program. The household may also exit if
the latest assessment using the standardized targeting system determines they are no longer in
poverty. Voluntary withdrawal or specific offenses may result in delisting (Magsumbol, 2022). The
4Ps employs the Pantawid-Kilos-Unlad Social Case Management Strategy to guide households
toward self-sufficiency and poverty exit within a seven-year operational period. Graduation signifies
achieving the highest well-being level, making households eligible for program exit based on Social
Welfare and Development Indicators (SWDI) before or after the seven-year duration.
The DSWD recently announced that over 300,000 households of 4Ps are graduating from the
program. National Program Manager for 4Ps, Gabuya, confirmed the reassessment’s completion,
with 761,140 families continuing as beneficiaries. According to the agency, these beneficiaries
remain eligible for conditional cash assistance based on established social criteria (Manahan, 2023).
Likewise, the Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS) released its third impact evaluation
(IE3) report on 4Ps. This study revealed that graduated beneficiaries exhibit self-sufficiency, aligning
with the DSWD’s reassessment results. Previous evaluations consistently emphasized the program’s
non-dependency nature and positive impacts on labor market outcomes. The IE3 report, spanning
from 2017 to 2019, highlighted the program’s positive effects on education and health. DSWD sees
these findings as a measure of success for the national poverty reduction program, reinforcing the
outcomes observed in the ongoing reassessment of 4Ps beneficiaries (Orbeta et.al, 2021). However,
beneficiaries through the 4Ps program in Guiguinto, Bulacan from 2021-2022. Aside from that,
this study shall also seek to accumulate insights with regard to the effectiveness of the Pantawid
Pamilyang Pilipino Program in promoting financial dependence and job attainment among
graduates. Nevertheless, this study shall fulfill its aim of digging deeper in the in-and-out of the
program, highlighting the long-term benefits and the bigger picture just as what the government
terms of:
2.1.2 Employment
2.1.3 Income
2.2.1 Health
2.2.2 Housing
2.2.3 Education
1. **Independent Variables:**
- **Program Design Features:** Examining specific aspects of the 4Ps program
mechanisms.
2. **Dependent Variables:**
3. **Mediating Variables:**
4. **Moderating Variables:**
household has been part of the program moderates its impact on self-sufficiency.
sufficiency among beneficiaries who have successfully completed the Pantawid Pamilyang
Pilipino Program (4Ps). Two pivotal categories of independent variables are considered. First
and foremost, the study meticulously examines the intricate aspects of program design features
within the 4Ps framework. This scrutiny involves a nuanced analysis of conditionality details,
elucidating the specific requirements for beneficiaries to access program benefits. Additionally,
the study delves into the payment mechanisms employed by the program, investigating the
modalities through which financial support is disbursed, and scrutinizes the grievance
comprehensive investigation. Age, gender, educational background, and household size are
discerned as key factors that potentially influence the self-sufficiency trajectory of graduated
beneficiaries. The research aims to disentangle the complex interplay of these demographic
sustained self-sufficiency.
Moving to the dependent variables, the study delineates a comprehensive set of self-sufficiency
indicators, each serving as a crucial metric for evaluating the post-program autonomy of
beneficiaries. This multifaceted set includes employable skills, employment status, income
levels, access to social security, health status, housing conditions, educational attainment, role
performance, and awareness of relevant social issues. The intention is to construct a nuanced and
holistic assessment framework, either by developing new metrics or employing existing ones, to
Furthermore, the study introduces a moderating variable to add depth to the analysis. The
duration of program participation is investigated to discern how the length of time a household
has been engaged with the 4Ps program may moderate the influence of program design features
In sum, this research adopts a meticulous and structured approach, meticulously examining the
![Conceptual Framework](image_link)
**Hypothesized Relationships:**
- Program Design Features and Demographic Characteristics collectively influence Program
Implementation Features.
- Program Implementation Features mediate the impact of Independent Variables on Self-
Sufficiency Indicators.
- The Duration of Program Participation moderates the relationship between Independent
Variables, Mediating Variables, and Self-Sufficiency Indicators.
This conceptual framework provides a visual representation of the complex interactions among
the key elements, guiding the investigation into the multifaceted factors influencing the self-
sufficiency of graduated beneficiaries from the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program.
**Statement of the Problem:**
The study seeks to examine the factors influencing the self-sufficiency of graduated beneficiaries
from the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program, utilizing the following variables:
This study aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the intricate relationships among
these variables, shedding light on the pathways to self-sufficiency for beneficiaries who have
graduated from the program.
Definition
Employable Skills: Evaluate their acquired skills and competencies through education or training
programs.
Employment: Examine their current employment status, job stability, and alignment with their
acquired skills.
Income: Measure their income levels, including wages, additional sources, and overall financial
stability.
Social Security: Assess their reliance on social security programs and their ability to manage
Health: Evaluate their overall health status and access to healthcare, addressing both physical and
mental well-being.
Housing: Examine their housing situation, considering stability, affordability, and adequacy.
Education: Assess their continued pursuit of education or skill development beyond the
program’s completion.
Role Performance: Evaluate their performance in societal roles, such as as parents, community
members, or employees.
Awareness of Relevant Social Issues: Gauge their awareness and engagement with social issues