0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views32 pages

2022 - d2 13 Tonicello Presentation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 32

Structural fire assessment of

an existing tunnel
Eric Tonicello & Julien Duboc – ISI Sàrl – Lausanne, Switzerland

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 1


Description of the project

Transformation of an existing tunnel

▪ Road tunnel under the Geneva Airport


▪ Transformation in the remit of a tramway project
▪ Check the fire safety :
✓ Evacuation
✓ Structural fire resistance

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 2


Fire resistance requirements

In Switzerland, no explicit fire duration requirement for tunnel structures

▪ Objective: Get enough time to people escape in safe conditions


• R60 as a minimum (sometimes 90 min.)

▪ Requirements for this specific tunnel:


• Ensure safe evacuation
• No structural collapse : Taxiway & Runway
• No significant deformations

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 3


Structure of the tunnel

Prestressed concrete structure

▪ The main structure consists of a double span slab, supported by RC walls


▪ ~100 % prestressed-based design on the transversal direction

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 4


Structure of the tunnel

Prestressed concrete structure - design


▪ Substitute forces to consider prestressed cables
• qp1, qp2, qp3 and qp4

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 5


Structure of the tunnel

Different sections
▪ 3 sections for the slab
▪ 3 sections for the walls
▪ «Few» rebars
▪ Mainly prestressings cables

Section_1 Section_2 Section_3

Wall ext Central Gallery


wall
FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 6
PBD approach – Step 1 : standard curves

▪ RWS and ISO fire curves

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 7


PBD approach – Step 2: natural fire scenarios

✓ Heavy Goods Vehicle fire


✓ Fuel tanker fire
✓ Tramway fire

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 8


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Thermal calculations
▪ Check the sensibility of the heating of the prestressing cables

Critical zone for prestressed cable


(Tconcrete > 100°C)

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 9


PBD approach – Checking the prestressing

Thermal calculations
▪ Check the sensibility of the heating of the prestressing cables

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 10


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Thermal calculations
▪ Temperature evolution in concrete and rebars
▪ 2D and 3D FEM calculation with SAFIR
13 cm

Evolution of Young modulus of prestressed


cable in function of temperature

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 11


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Thermal calculations
▪ Temperature evolution in concrete and rebars
▪ 2D and 3D FEM calculation with SAFIR

Loss of «substitute forces» due to temperature

▪ Thermal elongation
✓ Li+1=α Li (Ti+1 – Ti) + Li

▪ Young modulus reduction


✓ Up to 13 cm in concrete

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 12


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Thermal calculations

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 13


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Structural calculations
▪ FEM calculation with SAFIR®

▪ Structural model with beam elements

▪ Loading conditions in function


of temperature
• According to thermal calculations

▪ Fire scenario in the right section :

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 14


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Structural calculations
▪ FEM calculation with SAFIR

Structural FEM model: initial state (black) / deformed state (blue)

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 15


PBD approach – Standard fire curves

Structural calculations
▪ FEM calculation with SAFIR

▪ Pre-stress concrete structure < R60 PBD results


Structural resistance
Maximum Residual
of tunnel in fire Fire resistance
▪ High deformations → collapse situation [minutes]
deformations deformations
[mm] [mm]
• Structure should be replaced ISO fire Collapse
36
• Significant interruption of Airport activities RWS fire 27 Collapse

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 16


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

CFD calculations with FDS


▪ Geometry of the tunnel
▪ Reaction of combustion
▪ Natural ventilation
Fuel tanker
scenario
HRR curves according to CETU guide
▪ Fuel tanker 200 MW
▪ HGV 100 MW
▪ Tramway ~64 MW (publications)

Tramway
scenario

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 17


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios
Tramway
Tramway 64 MW scenario in FDS

▪ HRR curve according to publications


and experiments for train fires

Additional fire load density


Publication as reference HRR tests in experiments considered

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 18


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

CFD calculations with FDS


▪ AST devices on ceiling and walls

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 19


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

CFD calculations with FDS


▪ AST devices on ceiling and walls

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 20


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

Thermal calculations
▪ Thermal stresses of CFD model as boundary conditions

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 21


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

Structural calculations Structural resistance


PBD results

Maximum Residual
▪ ISO / RWS / 100 MW / 200 MW: KO of tunnel in fire
situation
Fire resistance
[minutes]
deformations deformations

▪ Tramway: OK [mm] [mm]


ISO fire 36 Collapse
RWS fire 27 Collapse
Tramway OK 25 13 - 15
▪ No spalling considered HGV 100 MW 28 Collapse
Fuel tanker 200 MW 27 Collapse
• ~600 – 800°C

Concrete spalling example


Surface temperature > 800°C (fuel tanker fire): high concrete spalling risk

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 22


PBD approach – Natural fire scenarios

Solutions:
▪ Organisational measures → no HGV and non fuel tanker in this tunnel
(must take another itinerary)
▪ Passive measures → Fire panels (Promatect-H EI90 or similar)
▪ Active measures → Water mist installation

PBD results
Structural resistance
Maximum Residual
of tunnel in fire Fire resistance
deformations deformations
situation [minutes]
[mm] [mm]
ISO fire 36 Collapse
RWS fire 27 Collapse
Tramway OK 25 13 - 15
HGV 100 MW 28 Collapse
Fuel tanker 200 MW 27 Collapse

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 23


PBD approach – Solutions

Passive measures
▪ Walls and main part of the
slab need to be protected

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 24


PBD approach – Solutions

Passive measures
▪ Walls and main part of the
slab need to be protected

Passive protection

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 25


PBD approach – Solutions

Passive measures
▪ Walls and main part of the slab need to be protected

▪ Low deformations with EI90 protection


• Promatect-H 25 mm or similar

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 26


PBD approach – Solutions

Passive measures
▪ Advantages:
• System reliability
• Less maintenance
• Very efficient
• Good feedback

▪ Drawbaks:
• Very expensive solution ~450 € / m2
• (brand new) Technical installations to be replaced post-fire
• Fire panels have to be replaced post-fire (need to close tunnel)
• No (cooling) effect on fire

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 27


PBD approach – Solutions

Active measure: water mist solution


▪ Tested up to 250 MW fire

Without water mist system With water mist system

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 28


PBD approach – Solutions

Active measure: water mist solution

▪ Tested up to 250 MW fire

▪ Cooling effect on fire after activation


▪ Quick HRR mitigation at the activation time

Test for HGV fire – 100 MW

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 29


PBD approach – Solutions

Active measure
▪ Advantages:
• Limited fire development
• Easier and safer for the firefighting
• Low damage risk for tunnel structures and
technical installations

▪ Drawbaks:
• Reliability 90 < P < 98 %
• Damages to nozzles (clogging, impacts)
• Smoke destratification (evacuation)
• Maintenance required

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 30


Results and conclusion

Current structural situation is unacceptable in case of fire


▪ Huge deformations of the slab → collapse very likely to happen
▪ Incompatibility with Airport activities (can’t be closed or interrupted for days)

Need to improve structural behavior and safety


▪ Mixed solution: localized passive protection + active measure

1. Fire panels in the most sensitives parts of the structure


2. Full water mist system coupled to a smoke/thermal/camera detection

PBD approach offers best solutions to clients in order to improve safety of


structures and guaranty the airport operations

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 31


Thanks for you attention

Questions are welcome ☺

Eric Tonicello – ISI Sàrl – Lausanne, Switzerland – eric.tonicello@incendie.ch


Julien Duboc – ISI Sàrl – Lausanne, Switzerland – julien.duboc@incendie.ch

FEMTC 2022, Brno - September 12-14, 2022 32

You might also like