Microorganisms 11 01308

microorganisms
Review
Strategies for the Management of Spike Protein-Related Pathology
Matthew T. J. Halma 1 , Christof Plothe 2 , Paul Marik 3 and Theresa A. Lawrie 1, *
1 EbMCsquared CIC, 11 Laura Place, Bath BA2 4BL, UK

2 Center for Biophysical Osteopathy, Am Wegweiser 27, 55232 Alzey, Germany
3 Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC), 2001 L St. NW Suite 500, Washington, DC 20036, USA;
pmarik@flccc.net
* Correspondence: tess@e-bmc.co.uk
Abstract: In the wake of the COVID-19 crisis, a need has arisen to prevent and treat two related
conditions, COVID-19 vaccine injury and long COVID-19, both of which can trace at least part
of their aetiology to the spike protein, which can cause harm through several mechanisms. One
significant mechanism of harm is vascular, and it is mediated by the spike protein, a common element
of the COVID-19 illness, and it is related to receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Given the significant
number of people experiencing these two related conditions, it is imperative to develop treatment
protocols, as well as to consider the diversity of people experiencing long COVID-19 and vaccine
injury. This review summarizes the known treatment options for long COVID-19 and vaccine injury,
their mechanisms, and their evidentiary basis.
Keywords: long COVID; COVID-19 vaccine injury; spike protein; thrombosis; inflammation;
repurposed medication; autophagy
1. Introduction
According to available data, by 30 September 2022, 68% of the world’s population had
received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, and 12.74 billion doses had been admin-
Citation: Halma, M.T.J.; Plothe, C.; istered [1]. The vaccines most commonly administered were Comirnaty (Pfizer/BioNTech),
Marik, P.; Lawrie, T.A. Strategies for Covishield (Astrazeneca), CoronaVac (Sinovac), Spikevax (Moderna), and Jcovden (Johnson
the Management of Spike & Johnson) [2]. Of these, approximately 30% of the doses produced by 22 January 2022
Protein-Related Pathology. were in the form of a novel vaccine with a synthetic N1-methyl-pseudoiridinylated mRNA
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1308. encapsulated in a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) [3].
https://doi.org/10.3390/ LNPs are a new technology that was not used in vaccine delivery until the emergency
microorganisms11051308 use authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer/BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273
Academic Editors: Keivan Zandi and COVID-19 vaccines [4]. This was also unprecedented in the approval process, being the
James J. Kohler fastest for any vaccine [5], leaving many concerns with regard to long-term safety [6], which
was difficult to evaluate due to the unblinding of the initial clinical trials [7].
Received: 16 March 2023 Whilst the delivery technology of LNPs have previously been used to deliver small
Revised: 4 May 2023
molecules, it has only recently been used to deliver RNA. LNPs are advantageous for
Accepted: 10 May 2023
targeting brain tissue, as they can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) [8,9]. The first
Published: 17 May 2023
drug used and LNP to deliver RNA was a small interfering RNA (siRNA)-based drug,
known as Onpattro (Alnylam Pharmaceuticals), first approved in 2018 for the treatment of
polyneuropathies [10].
Copyright: © 2023 by the authors.
Given both the novelty of the technology and the paucity of data on which approval
Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. was based (which was also subject to data integrity issues [11]), long-term effects cannot
This article is an open access article be definitively ruled out, especially because many of the foundational claims on which
distributed under the terms and approval was based have been contested by recent experiments [12–14]. For example,
conditions of the Creative Commons in contrast to claims that the injection stayed at the injection site [15], and that spike
Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// protein would only be expressed for a short period of time (based on the lability of non-
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ pseudouridylated RNA [16]), the contents and products of the COVID-19 vaccines have
4.0/). been found in the blood stream of most vaccinees studied within hours to days [12].
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051308 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms

Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1308 2 of 26
The first claim was based on Intramuscular administration [15], and the second claim
was based on the lability of RNA [17], with a typical RNA half-life of minutes [18]; however,
biodistribution studies have found significant expression of spikes in other tissues and
organs [12], and researchers have found both vaccine mRNA and spike protein (which is
encoded by the vaccine sequence) two months post-administration [14], and even up to
four months post-vaccination [13]. One preprint study of people with SARS-CoV-2 negative
post-vaccination Long COVID-19-like symptoms showed spike protein persistence, on
average, 105 days post vaccination [19]. Long COVID-19 patients (post SARS-CoV-2
infection) show spike protein persistence up to 15 months [20]. Another study showed
spike protein persistence in the gut of long COVID-19 patients, but not in the bloodstream.
Spike proteins can be packaged in exosomes [13], possibly resulting in inflammation
and immune activation [21,22] in organs and tissues distant from the injection site [13].
Extracellular vesicles are capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier [23], and LNPs, as
well as exosomes, will exchange more readily in small diameter vessels with low flow
rates (i.e., capillaries and small vessels) [24]. Importantly, the spike protein seems to
additionally impact blood–brain barrier permeability [25,26]. These results challenge the
initial mechanistic foundation on which the presumption of safety is contingent.
Compared with other vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines have a much higher adverse
event rate [27]. Histopathological findings and autopsies of those dying post-vaccination
support the causative role of the vaccine in deaths [28], most commonly from vascular-
related events. Pharmacovigilance programs in several countries have observed a safety
signal for myocarditis in the COVID-19 vaccinated population [29–31]. A US survey
found that 19% of myocarditis cases had not recovered at 90 days after onset [32]. In
addition, screening of BNT162b2 vaccine recipients among boys aged 13–18 in a Thai study
revealed that 2.3% of the boys had at least one elevated cardiac biomarker or positive
lab assessment, and 29% had at least one cardiac manifestation, such as tachycardia,
palpitation, or myopericarditis [33]. Given this information, and given the ubiquitous
use of COVID-19 vaccines, it is possible that widespread subclinical damage exists in the
COVID-19 vaccinated population. Structurally, the spike protein, particularly the receptor-
binding domain (RBD) of the S1 subunit, has attracted much attention, as it is the most
prominent aspect of the viral capsid [34] (It consists of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N))
glycoproteins. Cell entry is mediated by the binding of Spike RBD to the Angiotensin
Converting Enzyme II (ACE2) [35]. Therefore, by preventing this binding through allosteric
inhibition, it is possible to prevent the entry of SARS-CoV-2 virions into the cell and
subsequent infection [36].
A strategy to inhibit S1 RBD binding to ACE2 has been employed in the development
of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines [37]. mRNA vaccines exclusively encode spike proteins, and
mono-antigenic targeting can create opportunities for immune escape by variants [38],
given that the mRNA vaccines do not halt transmission [39]. Positive selection pressure
is observed on residues of the spike protein because of widespread vaccination, although
these cannot be definitively related causally [40,41].
This article sets out to first describe the mechanisms of spike protein related pathology
and the factors which affect them (e.g., patient characteristics) and their relevant biomarkers
and diagnostics. The objective, then, is to introduce therapeutics with some promise, based
on either mechanistic or clinical evidence, and to summarize the evidence base for each
intervention, so that practitioners and scientists may be guided concerning therapeutic de-
velopment. Other articles cover the pathophysiology of long COVID-19, as well as provide
a list of therapeutics under investigation [42], and a recent review describes the similarities
between long COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine injury [43]. This review is unique in
that it provides an integrated discussion of disease mechanism for both post-COVID-19
vaccination syndrome and long COVID-19, which are difficult to distinguish in many cases,
and summarizes the treatment modalities available to those experiencing symptoms.
2. Methods
This review begins by summarizing the mechanisms of harm from spike protein,
either from COVID-19 illness or form COVID-19 vaccination. We also cover the clinical
aspects, which can affect the course of the disease. The review then moves to therapeutic
mechanisms, which can address the spike protein via different pathways.
For therapeutic interventions for these conditions (long COVID-19 and vaccine in-
jury) with a plausible mechanism of action against spike protein, these are shown in the
results section. Relevant clinical trials are added, and any direct evidence or proxy evi-
dence for efficacy (such as efficacy against original COVID-19 illness) is included in the
rightmost column.
Additionally, we include clinical trials on long COVID-19 and vaccine injury in Ta-
ble S1. A search for clinical trials for the condition “Long COVID OR Long COVID-19”
in ClinicalTrials.gov revealed 317 studies. A search for clinical trials on vaccine adverse
events revealed that one study used rutin and glycoside-rich mulberry juice to reduce
adverse events to C19 injection [44]. Other studies, while not specifically treating the
immune response, administer therapy alongside vaccination to observe changes in re-
sponse. These include spermidine [45], probiotics [46], a yeast-based supplement rich in
selenium and zinc [47], plant stanol esters [48], mushrooms [49], deltoid muscle exercises
(for site pain) [50], osteopathic manipulative treatment [51,52], metformin [53], iron [54],
ergoferon [55], ketogenic diet [56], and immunosuppressants [57,58].
It is a difficult task to assess the evidentiary basis for each type of intervention, as
few meta-analyses have been carried out. For example, a search in the Cochrane Col-
laboration Library for “Post Acute COVID-19” yields one relevant review on remedying
olfactory dysfunction, finding limited evidence for the usefulness of proposed therapies [59].
Furthermore, 46 relevant completed studies for the search term “Long COVID” exist on
ClinicalTrials.gov (8 January 2023). As few systematic reviews exist, we aim to summarize
the evidentiary basis of the known interventions currently in clinical trials for the treatment
of long COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine injury are shown in Table S1. There is a single
review on treating COVID-19 vaccine injury that could be found, which is included in
Table S1.
3. Pathophysiology
3.1. Mechanisms of Harm
As mentioned previously, while it was expected that the LNP-encapsulated synthetic
mRNAs would remain at the injection site and rapidly degrade, there is substantial evidence
that they enter the bloodstream [60], deposit in other tissues [61], and even in the breast milk
of lactating mothers [62]. The S1 subunit of the spike protein can damage the endothelial
lining of blood vessels [63–65]. Vaccine particles in the bloodstream can cause a significant
inflammatory response in blood vessels [66].
Several hypotheses for the mechanisms of long COVID-19 exist, including immune
dysregulation, auto-immunity, endothelial dysfunction, activation of coagulation, and
latent viral persistence [67,68], though this review focuses on the elements common to
both COVID-19 infection and vaccine injury. Cardiovascular complications, particularly
microthrombus formation, feature both in the etiologies of long COVID-19 [69,70] as well
as COVID-19 vaccine injury [71].
The SARS-CoV-2 (infection or vaccine produced) spike protein can bind to the ACE2
receptor on platelets, leading to their activation [72], and it can cause fibrinogen-resistant
blood clots [73]. Spike protein fragments can also be amyloidogenic on their own [74].
Several reports demonstrate elevated troponin levels in cardiac symptoms following the
COVID-19 vaccine [75].
Ontologically, both infection and vaccination express the spike protein, though some
subtle differences exist between the vaccine-generated and the infection-generated spike
protein. Importantly, the spike protein encoded by vaccines is static and does not un-
dergo evolution, whereas the spike protein produced by infection evolves as the virus
evolves [76,77]. There is one exception to this, and that is when the vaccine is updated, as
it is in the bivalent boosters of Pfizer and Moderna, which express the spike protein of both
the B.1.1.529 (omicron) BA.5 sublineage and the ancestral WA1/2020 strain [78]. The other
important distinction between vaccine spike and infection spike is the stabilized pre-fusion
state in the vaccine spike, which results in an increased ACE2 binding affinity compared to
spike proteins generated via SARS-CoV-2 infection [79]. The difference in the circulating (in
the population) SARS-CoV-2 spike protein to the spike protein (either vaccine or infection
generated) of one’s initial immune imprinting has important implications for immune
escape [77,80] and immune-mediated damage [81]. Immune escape is demonstrated in
population studies showing waning vaccine efficacy [82].
In 2021, a comprehensive investigation revealed consistent pathophysiological alter-
ations after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, including alterations of immune cell gene
expression [83].
3.2. Clinical Observations

Although no official definition exists for ‘post-COVID-19-Vaccine Syndrome,’ a tem-
poral correlation between receiving a COVID-19 vaccine and the beginning or worsening
of a patient’s clinical manifestations is sufficient to make the diagnosis of a COVID-19
vaccine-induced injury when the symptoms are unexplained by other concurrent causes.
It should, however, be recognized that there is a significant overlap between the symp-
toms and features of the long COVID-19 syndrome [84] and the post-COVID-19-Vaccine
Syndrome [85]. However, a number of clinical features appear to be distinctive of the post-
COVID-19 vaccine syndrome; most notably, severe neurological symptoms (particularly
small fiber neuropathy) appears to be more common following vaccination [86–88]. To
complicate matters further, patients with long COVID-19 are often vaccinated [89], making
the issue of definition more difficult.
Unfortunately, only post mortem examination to date can prove causal relationship
when tissues damaged demonstrate the presence of spike protein and absence of nucleo-
capsid protein (SARS-CoV-2 only) [90].
The true magnitude of post-COVID-19-Vaccine Syndrome is unknown, as data are lim-
ited to short duration clinical trials. From a survey of vaccinated individuals, approximately
1% required medical attention immediately following vaccination [91]. A nationwide cohort
study of U.S. veterans reported adverse reactions in 8.5% of recipients of the Pfizer vaccine
and 7.9% of those receiving the Moderna vaccine [92].
A number of factors are associated with an increased risk of adverse events;
these include:
• Genetics: first-degree relatives of people who have suffered a vaccine injury appear
to be at a very high risk of vaccine injury. People with a methylenetetrahydrofolate
reductase (MTHFR) gene mutation [93] and those with Ehlers-Danlos type syndromes,
may be at an increased risk of injury. Increased homocysteine levels have been linked
to worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19 [94,95]. Increased homocysteine levels
may potentiate the microvascular injury and thrombotic complications associated with
spike protein-related vaccine injury [96,97].
• mRNA load and quantity of spike protein produced: this may be linked to specific
vaccine lots that contain a higher concentration of mRNA due to variances in manu-
facturing quality, as well as heterogeneity within the vial [98].
• Type and batch of vaccine: variances in the levels of adverse reactions were observed,
depending on the manufacturer of the vaccine [91].
• Number of vaccines given: the risk of antibody enhancement (ADE) increases with
each exposure to the virus or a vaccine. A negative inverse correlation of dosages
given, as well as effectiveness, was also observed [99].
• Sex: the majority of vaccine-injured people are female [100], and vaccines historically
have sex-specific effects [101].
• Underlying nutritional status and comorbidities: certain preexisting conditions may

likely have primed the immune system to be more reactive after vaccination [102].
This includes those with preexisting autoimmune disorders [103].
4. Therapeutic Interventions
There are several non-specific means of counteracting the effects of long-COVID-19 and
post-COVID-19 vaccine injury. These include nutritional support for general immune regula-
tion and for overall health [104], as well as more specific, spike protein-specific therapeutics.
Non-specific therapeutic moieties include nutritional optimization, as diet-related
pathologies, including obesity [105] and type 2 diabetes [106], were associated with worse
outcomes from COVID-19 infection. Additionally, high blood glucose facilitates several
steps of the viral lifecycle and infection progression [107], motivating the reduction in
sugar and refined carbohydrate intake, which are associated with increases in blood sugar.
Furthermore, adoption of a whole-food, plant-based diet is associated with decreased
oxidative stress and inflammation [108] and better cardiovascular conditions. These posi-
tive impacts are attributed to their nutrient profiles, consisting of antioxidants, vitamins,
minerals, and phytochemical-containing phenolic compounds, which can exert antioxidant,
anti-inflammatory, and other beneficial effects [109,110].
The microbiota plays a fundamental role in the induction, training, and function of
the host’s immune system and thus shape the responses to its challenges [111]. Gut micro-
biome composition was significantly altered in patients with COVID-19 compared with
non-COVID-19 individuals, irrespective of whether patients had received medication [112].
The researchers said patients with severe illness exhibit high blood plasma levels of inflam-
matory cytokines and inflammatory markers. Additionally, given altered gut microbiota
composition in SARS-CoV-2 infected subjects, there is substantial involvement of the GI
tract during infection. These results suggest that gut microbiota composition is associated
with the magnitude of immune response to COVID-19 and subsequent tissue damage and
thus could play a role in regulating disease severity. The scientists also found that, because
a small subset of patients showed gut microbiota dysbiosis, or imbalance, even 30 days
after recovery, this could be a potential explanation for why some symptoms persist in long
COVID-19 [113].
Given the intricate influence of gut microbiota (GM) on host immune effectors and
subsequent inflammatory profile, GM composition and function might contribute to ex-
plaining the individual resilience/fragility with respect to COVID-19 and/or the response
to therapeutics (vaccines), which deserve further research [114]. Microbial diversity can be
improved by consuming many prebiotics and probiotics, such as sauerkraut and kimchi.
The design and discovery of spike protein inhibitors have followed a typical drug
repurposing process. Given the structural similarity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
to other coronaviruses [115,116], compounds that work for these could potentially be
repurposed for SARS-CoV-2 spike inhibition.
Typically, once a prospective compound for repurposing has been identified, it is
tested using a ligand-binding assay (LBA) [117]. These assays can provide information
on binding affinity and kinetics, as well as binding stoichiometries and even cooperative
effects [117].
The next level of verification may be an in vitro assay for viral inhibition in cell culture,
where cells are infected with a virus, and viral levels or titre (concentration) are measured by
counting viral plaques [118] or measuring viral nucleic acid (NA) levels [119]. Control cells
are compared with treated cells. Though the approach has limitations, in not considering
the whole-body dynamics of a virus [120], it can serve as a useful starting point.
In vivo studies are a further level of verification, which show the impact of the inter-
vention in an animal model. Beyond in vivo studies, there are clinical studies, which are
typically of two design types: observational and randomized control trials (RCTs) [121].
To date, little to no guidance has been provided by health authorities on how to manage
spike protein related disease, leaving it up to independent scientists and doctors to develop.
In vivo studies are a further level of verification, which show the impact of the inter-
vention in an animal model. Beyond in vivo studies, there are clinical studies, which are
Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1308 typically of two design types: observational and randomized control trials (RCTs) [121]. 6 of 26
To date, little to no guidance has been provided by health authorities on how to man-
age spike protein related disease, leaving it up to independent scientists and doctors to
develop. Regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Syn-
Regarding the COVID-19 Vaccine induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (TTS),
drome (TTS), a 2021 review made suggestions on management, including intravenous im-
a 2021 review made suggestions on management, including intravenous immunoglob-
munoglobulin, anticoagulants, and plasma exchange in severe cases [122]. These compounds
ulin, anticoagulants, and plasma exchange in severe cases [122]. These compounds are
are nutritional supplements and natural products, with some repurposed pharmaceuticals
nutritional supplements and natural products, with some repurposed pharmaceuticals
(Tables 1 and 2).
(Tables 1 and 2).
This list points to the available evidence on each therapy and advances them for fur-
This list points to the available evidence on each therapy and advances them for
ther
furtherinvestigation.
investigation.The Thefollowing
followingtherapeutics
therapeuticswork
workthrough
through different mechanisms, but
different mechanisms, but
welargely
we largelyfocus
focuson onthose
thoseproteins
proteinsthat
thatbind
binddirectly
directlywith
withthethespike
spikeprotein
proteinforforimproved
improved
clearance. Here, we summarize studies with different levels of evidence for
clearance. Here, we summarize studies with different levels of evidence for their respective their respec-
tive efficacies, from in silico predictions, which can be based on binding
efficacies, from in silico predictions, which can be based on binding predictions or systems predictions or
systems biological associations, to those showing activity in an in vitro or
biological associations, to those showing activity in an in vitro or cell-free assay, in vivocell-free assay,
in vivo studies,
studies, and any and anyor
clinical clinical or epidemiological
epidemiological evidence.evidence.
Giventhe
Given themany
manyuncertainties
uncertainties around
around the
theduration
durationof ofspike
spikeprotein
proteinproduction
productionand and
the variables determining production, adopting a preventive approach
the variables determining production, adopting a preventive approach seems sensible, seems sensible,
providedthe
provided theproposed
proposedinterventions
interventionsare aresafe.
safe.ItItremains
remainsunknown
unknownwhether
whetherfull fullrecovery
recovery
from COVID-19 Vaccine Injury is possible. However, we suggest targeting
from COVID-19 Vaccine Injury is possible. However, we suggest targeting several different several differ-
ent processes to reduce symptoms associated with both vaccine injury
processes to reduce symptoms associated with both vaccine injury and long COVID-19. and long COVID-
19. These
These include:
include:
(1)
(1) Establishing aa healthy
Establishing healthy microbiome
microbiome
(2)
(2) Inhibiting spike
Inhibiting spike protein
protein cleavage
cleavage and
and binding
binding (stopping
(stopping ongoing
ongoing damage)
damage)
(3)
(3) Clearing the
Clearing the spike
spike protein
protein from
from the
the body
body (clearing
(clearingthe
thedamaging
damagingagents)
agents)
(4)
(4) Healing the
Healing the damage
damage caused
caused byby the
the spike
spike protein
protein (restoring
(restoringhomeostasis
homeostasisand
andboosting
boosting
the immune
the immune system)
system)
Thesecategories
These categoriesare arenot
notclearly
clearlyseparate,
separate,as ascompounds
compoundsbindingbindingto tothe
thespike
spikecan
canboth
both
inactivate it by preventing its binding to ACE2, as well as aid in its
inactivate it by preventing its binding to ACE2, as well as aid in its clearance. There areclearance. There are
manybiological
many biologicalpathways
pathwaysthrough
throughwhich whichaagivengiven effect
effect can
can occur.
occur. To
Toinhibit
inhibitthe
theharmful
harmful
effects
effects of
of the
the spike
spike protein,
protein, itit isispossible
possible to totarget
targetthethefurin
furincleavage,
cleavage, either
either by
by directly
directly
binding
bindingto tothe
thefurin
furincleavage
cleavagesitesiteitself
itself[123–125]
[123–125]or orbybyinterfering
interferingwith
withthetheserine
serineprotease
protease
reaction
reaction[126–128]
[126–128]toto block thethe
block interaction
interactionby binding
by bindingto ACE2 [129], downregulating
to ACE2 ACE2
[129], downregulating
expression [130], inhibiting the transition to the active conformation
ACE2 expression [130], inhibiting the transition to the active conformation of S protein of S protein [131], or
binding the RBD of spike protein and allosterically inhibiting interaction
[131], or binding the RBD of spike protein and allosterically inhibiting interaction with with ACE2 [132]
(Figure 1). Clearing
ACE2 [132] (Figure of
1).spike proteins
Clearing can proteins
of spike also be accomplished by increasing
can also be accomplished byautophagy,
increasing
which clears which
autophagy, proteins and proteins
clears recycles and theirrecycles
amino acids
their [133].
amino acids [133].
Figure1.1.The
Figure Theprocess
processof
ofspike
spikeprotein
proteincleavage
cleavageinto
intoS1
S1and
andS2
S2subunits
subunitsand
andsubsequent
subsequentbinding
bindingof
of
theS1
the S1receptor
receptorbinding
bindingdomain
domain(RBD)
(RBD)totothe
theangiotension
angiotensionconverting
convertingenzyme2
enzyme2(ACE2)
(ACE2)receptor
receptoron
on
host cells. Each of the different subprocesses present opportunities for interference in spike binding
to ACE2, as well as a potential means of treating spike protein related pathology.
4.1. Establishing a Healthy Microbiome

The state of the microbiome is an essential criterion for the progression of acute COVID-
19 infection, long COVID-19, and post vaccine syndrome [134–138]. Patients with post-
vaccine syndrome classically have a severe dysbiosis with loss of Bifidobacterium [139–141].
A whole-food, plant-based diet may improve outcomes in COVID-19 [142–144], and people
following plant-based diets, on average, experienced less severe COVID-19 symptoms [145].
Dietary sources of probiotics include fermented dairy [146], chia seeds [147], glucoman-
nan [148,149], and supplements [150].
Microbiome diversity and richness can be improved through a diet rich in prebi-
otic fiber and probiotics, particularly fermented foods, which can subsequently lower
inflammation [151].
4.2. Preventing Spike Protein Damage

Inhibiting Spike Protein Cleavage
The furin cleavage site on SARS-CoV-2 has been suggested as a reason for its increased
infectivity relative to SARS-CoV [152], which had a higher fatality rate, which was much
less infectious [153]. Cleavage of the full-length spike protein into S1 and S2 subunits
is essential for SARS-CoV-2 entry into human lung cells [126,154–156]. The full-length
spike is present in both SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as vaccination, and it is the only
protein common to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination (it is the only protein present in
vaccination) [157].
Vaccine-produced spike has an important difference as compared to the SARS-CoV-
2 spike—the inclusion of two proline mutations to stabilize the pre-fusion state of the
spike protein. These are related to Pfizer’s BNT162b2 [158], Moderna’s mRNA-1273 [159],
Johnson & Johnson’s Ad26.COV2.S [160], and NovaVax’s NVAX-CoV2373 [161]. This was
first discovered in the context of MERS [162]. Other vaccines apparently encode the full-
length, wild-type spike protein, including AstraZeneca’s ChAdOx1 [163] and SinoVac’s
CoronaVac [164].
These dual proline mutations featured in the mRNA vaccines stabilize the pre-fusion
state, though some cleavage still occurs [162,165,166], and, interestingly, the mutations
produce an unknown cleavage product of 40 kDa, where typical cleavage products for the
wild-type spike protein are 80 kDa [166]. As such, targeting the cleavage of spike protein
is likely to make a difference in long COVID, as well as vaccine injury from the vaccines
encoding the full-length wild-type spike protein (AstraZeneca, SinoVac and others), though
this may have less of an impact in vaccines encoding the pre-fusion-stabilized spike protein
(Pfizer, Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, NovaVax and others).
Notably, targeting cleavage has also been identified as a therapeutic modality in
the context of acute COVID-19 [167,168], which can take place via at least three distinct
pathways: cleavage by furin, trypsin, or trans-membrane serine protease [167–169].
4.3. Inhibiting Spike Protein Binding

One of the most direct therapeutic mechanisms is to seek compounds which disrupt
the ACE2/Spike interface, either through binding ACE2 or spike in isolation, or disrupting
the interface itself. This problem is a steric and conformational problem, for which computa-
tional prediction using structural models is highly amenable. A great many computational
studies of the spike protein and ACE2 binding compounds have been performed, and some
of these hits have further been developed through LBAs, in vitro studies, in vivo studies in
animal models, and, lastly, clinical trials with human subjects. Few of the compounds reach
the final stage, though several with this mechanism of action have been investigated. Most
promising were ivermectin and quercetin, as computational prediction showed these bind
to the spike. If the spike is bound in the receptor binding domain (RBD), the interaction
with ACE2 receptors, by which spike protein exerts its inflammatory effect, is also inhibited.
Similarly, compounds which bind to the ACE2 receptor can also antagonistically
compete with the spike protein for a limited number of receptor sites. For example,
the diabetes medication metformin has been identified as a potential long COVID-19
therapeutic agent due to this mechanism of action. Decreasing the level of spike actively
binding to ACE2 has therapeutic implications.
4.4. Clearing Spike Protein

So far, we have discussed ways to inhibit the impacts of the spike protein on the host’s
system. Importantly, to progress beyond this, it is necessary to clear out the spike protein.
This can be accomplished through upregulation of the protein degradative pathways in the
body through upregulation of autophagy. Autophagy can be upregulated by fasting [170]
and calorie restriction [171], especially if protein is reduced [172]. Autophagy in many
instances does not require the complete cessation of food intake (protocols are available
at https://COVID19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/, accessed on 15 April 2023).
Sharply decreasing protein intake can upregulate autophagy pathways [173], and this can
be accomplished while still eating, which makes this more approachable as a protocol.
Regular fasting was also associated with better outcomes from acute COVID-19 [174].
Spermidine, a polyanion compound found in high concentrations in wheat germ [175],
can potently stimulate autophagy [176]. Other factors which influence autophagy are acute
heat exposure, as one would experience in a sauna [177,178], flavonoid consumption [179],
phenolic compounds [180,181], and coffee [182]. Resveratrol can also induce fasting, as it
acts as a protein restriction mimetic [183], and metformin, a diabetes medication, can influ-
ence autophagy signaling [184]. Surprisingly, cold exposure, in addition to heat exposure,
also increases autophagy [185,186]. Hyperbaric oxygen [187] and ozone therapy [188] may
also stimulate autophagy.
4.5. Healing the Damage

After the damage process has been attenuated, it is necessary to heal the damage
that has occurred. The healing stage requires normalizing the immune response, reducing
lingering inflammation (such as by targeting interleukin 6 [189]), and addressing any acute
damage in affected tissues, particularly cardiovascular damage [69–71]. Damage reduction
may also mean reducing the level of blood clotting if clotting is present and repairing any
organ damage, if relevant. The stage of healing requires normalizing the immune response,
reducing lingering inflammation (such as by targeting interleukin 6 [189]), and addressing
any acute damage in whatever affected tissues, which, for our purposes, includes blood.
Micro-clots are a possible etiological factor in long COVID-19 [190–192], as well as COVID-
19 vaccine injury [193]. Damage reduction may also mean reducing the level of blood
clotting if clotting is present, and repairing any organ damage, if relevant. Sufferers of
long COVID-19 have been found to have a higher inflammatory response to the initial
COVID-19 infection than those who recover completely from COVID-19 [194], so anti-
inflammatory and immunomodulatory medications have been identified as potential long
COVID-19 therapeutics.
Anti-coagulant medication, such as aspirin, can be useful in alleviating the cardiovas-
cular complications of COVID-19 [195,196], as they have a long history of use in improving
blood flow and reducing coagulopathies [197–199].
Another useful compound for breaking up blood clots is nattokinase, which is a fibri-
nolytic found in fermented soybeans (bacterial species Bacillus subtilis var. natto) [200,201].
Experiments have demonstrated that it potently degrades spike protein [202,203], which is
an added benefit in addition to its fibrinolytic and anti-coagulant properties [204].
4.6. Potential Therapeutics

In Table 1, we grouped the therapeutics by mechanism and stage (as per our above
definitions) and included information on their origins. Our categorization for sources is
based on the classification of natural products (NP) or pharmaceutical drugs (PD). For
natural products, we included the most common source organism(s) based on its scientific
name for consistency.
The pharmaceutical compounds with plausible applicability for the treatment of long
COVID-19 and post-vaccine syndrome are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Pharmaceutical compounds with plausible mechanisms of action against spike protein-
related pathologies.
Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Results

Multiple
Ivermectin Binding of spike [205–209]
protein
Reducing inflammatory Proxy: significant decrease in
Corticosteroids [210,211] NCT05350774
response breathlessness [212]
Antihistamines Reduced inflammation [213–215]
Aspirin Anti-coagulant [216]
Low Dose Naltrexone NCT05430152
Immunomodulatory [217,218] Significant improvement [218]
(LDN) NCT04604704
Reduced myocardial infarction,
stroke and cardiovascular death
Colchicine Reduces inflammation [219–221]
(non-COVID-19 or vaccine
related) [222]
An amount of 42% relative decrease
Metformin Several [223] NCT04510194 in long-COVID incidence after
treatment of initial C19 infection [224]
Likewise, natural compounds and supplements with plausible applicability for the
treatment of long COVID-19 and post-vaccine syndrome are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Natural compounds and supplements with plausible mechanisms of action against spike
protein-related pathologies.
Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Evidence Summary

Vitamin D Immunomodulatory [225] NCT05356936 Proxy (C19 severity) [226]
Reduction in fatigue (not
long-COVID-19 related) [227]
improved oxygenation, decrease in
inflammatory markers, and a faster
recovery were observed in initial
Immune support,
Vitamin C [227] NCT05150782 COVID-19 infection (proxy
antioxidant
measure for long-COVID-19) [228]
Improvement in general fatigue
symptoms when combined with
L -arginine [229]
Significant improvement [230]
Proxy evidence (severity of
Vitamin K2 Immunomodulatory [231] NCT05356936
COVID-19 infection) [231]
Antioxidant,
anti-inflammatory, cellular
N-Acetyl Cysteine NCT05371288 Proxy evidence (severity of
metabolism, [233–236]
(NAC) NCT05152849 COVID-19 infection) [234]
blocks S-ACE2 interface
(IS [232])
Antioxidant,
Proxy (severity of COVID-19
Glutathione anti-inflammatory, cellular [237–239] NCT05371288
infection) [239,240]
metabolism
Table 2. Cont.

Antioxidant, Proxy (higher rate of recovery,
Melatonin anti-inflammatory, cellular [241] lower risk of intensive care unit
metabolism admission) [242]
Anti-inflammatory Proxy (faster time to negative PCR
Quercetin spike-ACE2 interaction [243,245–247] test when combined with Vitamin
[243,244] D and curcumin) [248]
Blocks spike-ACE2
Emodin [249]
interaction [249]
Black cumin seed
extract Anti-inflammatory [250–252]
(nigella sativa)
Anti-inflammaotry, Proxy (lower rates of
Resveratrol [253–255]
anti-thrombotic hospitalization) [256]
Inhibits spike–ACE2
interaction,
Proxy (lowers inflammatory
Curcumin inhibits virus [259–261] NCT05150782
cytokines) [261,262]
encapsulation [257], binds
SC2 proteins (IS) [258]
Proxy (low magnesium–calcium
ratio associated with higher C19
Multifactorial, nutritional
Magnesium [263,264] mortality [265], low magnesium
support
associated with higher risk of
infection [266])
Proxy (possibe better acute C19
Zinc Nutritional support [267–269] NCT04798677 * outcomes [270], other meta-analysis
did not confirm efficacy [271])
Anti-coagulant, Proxy: degrades spike protein
Nattokinase [202,203]
degrades spike (IVT) [203] in vitro [203]
Proxy (lowered hospital admission
Fish Oil Anti-coagulant [272–274] NCT05121766
and mortality [272])
Faster recovery of olfactory
dysfunction when combined with
Decreases inflammation
Luteolin [275–277] NCT05311852 ultramicronized
[275]
palmitoylethanolamide and
olfactory training [278]
Decrease inflammation
St. John’s Wort [279,280]
[279]
Senolytic [281]
Binds SARS-CoV-2 main
Fisetin protease (IS) [282] [281,283,284]
Binds spike protein
(IS) [283]
Frankincense Binds to Furin [285] NCT05150782 Positive impact [286]
Binds SARS-CoV-2 spike
Apigenin (IS [244]), [288,289]
antioxidant [287]
Nutmeg Anti-coagulant [290]
Inhibits replication (IVT)
Sage [291,292]
[291]
Table 2. Cont.

Rutin Binds spike [293] [294] NCT05387252 †
Antiviral in in vitro assays as
Limonene Anti-inflammatory [295]
whole bark product [296]
NCT05524532
Algae Immunomodulatory [297] [298–300]
NCT04777981
Proxy (reduction in sore throat in
Dandelion leaf Blocks S1–ACE2
[301] combination with other extracts
extract interaction (IS + IVT [301]
[302]
Immunomodulatory
Cinnamon [305,306]
[303,304]
Antioxidant,
anti-inflammatory [307]
Milk thistle extract Evidence for mechanism, but not
Endothelial protective [308]
(Silymarin) treatment, as of October 2022 [307]
(IVO [308])
Blocks spike [308]
Binds ACE2 (IVT),
Proxy (no decrease in C19 severity
Andrographis reduction in viral load [310,311]
[312]
(IVT) [309]
prunella vulgaris Blocks spike [313] [313]
Immunomodulatory,
Licorice [315–318] Proxy (inhibits virus in vitro [319])
anti-inflammatory [314]
Anti-inflammatory (IVO Proxy (lowers inflammatory
Cardamom [320]
[320] markers) [320]
Antithrombotic,
anti-inflammatory [321],
Blocks S1–ACE2 Prevents post-COVID-19 cognitive
Cloves [321]
interaction (IS, CFA) [322], impairment [324]
stimulates
autophagy [323]
Proxy. Reduced the hospitalization
Ginger Unknown
period in SC2 infection [325]
Proxy (faster recovery from C19)
Garlic Immunomodulatory [326] [326–328]
[329]
Antioxidant, nutrient rich, Positive impact on energy levels
Thyme [331]
anti-inflammatory [330] [289]
ACE2 signalling pathways Meta-analysis reveals propolis and
(IS [332], IVT, IVO) honey could probably improve
Propolis [333,336,337]
[333,334] clinical COVID-19 symptoms and
Immunomodulation [335] decrease viral clearance time [332]
Clinical trials were conducted for a long period, unless otherwise stated. Clinical trials are for long COVID-19,
unless otherwise stated. * Vaccine immune response. † Adverse reactions to vaccination adverse reaction. Under
mechanism. IS: in silico. IVT: in vitro. IVO: in vivo.
5. Discussion
The amelioration of symptoms and recovery of large numbers of people worldwide
from both long COVID and post-vaccine syndrome and injury requires the use of non-
invasive, integrative therapies that can be scaled and administered in a decentralized
fashion. It is important to disseminate this knowledge to the lay public so that they
can mitigate their individual risks and those of their loved ones. While it is difficult to
enumerate the true scale of post-vaccination or post-COVID clotting disorders, there has
been an appreciable rise in cardiac incidents [29], strokes (inter-cerebral hemorrhages [338]),
and non-COVID excess mortality [339,340]. A significant increase in total mortality due to
a vaccine is not unprecedented, as the DTP vaccine administered in Guineau-Bissau in the
1980s increased child mortality by four times compared to unvaccinated mortality [341].
While the magnitude of the impact of both long COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 Vaccine
Syndrome or injury is unclear, it is important to prepare for the potential consequences by
having information ready for dissemination, as well as to perform research on promising
therapeutics to relieve the damage caused by spike protein and other potential mechanisms
of harm, such as DNA integration [342]. One limitation of this study is that it focuses
on spike-protein related pathology and can leave out other possibilities, such as allergies
to vaccine components, or other disease etiologies. Long COVID-19 and post-COVID-
19 vaccine syndrome are multifaceted disorders, with highly varied manifestations; as
such, the development of objective diagnostics is important in treating patients. The
therapies discussed in this review have a varying evidentiary basis and may serve as
starting points for the development of therapies to relieve spike protein-related pathologies
in the coming years.
Further research requires validating the treatments outlined in this review by ran-
domized control trial (RCT), observational studies, and laboratory studies of biological
mechanism. Furthermore, integration of the current research on spike-protein related
disorders is helpful. One possibility is the application of systems biology tools to describe
the perturbations to different biological pathways influenced by the spike protein. When
such a model exists, it is possible to treat the acute manifestations of the disease while still
clearing spike protein form the body.
Governments and national health services are beginning to come to terms with the
sheer magnitude of the task in front of them. This review outlines some of the most
promising therapies form an evidentiary and biological mechanistic perspective. We hope
that this article be used in the construction of treatment protocols to treat these highly
related conditions in their many disease manifestations, prioritizing not only safety and
efficacy, but cost and availability to large numbers of people.
Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https:
//www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11051308/s1, Table S1: Overview of Clinical
Trials for Long-COVID and COVID-19 vaccine injury.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.T.J.H.; methodology, M.T.J.H.; investigation, M.T.J.H.,
C.P., P.M., and T.A.L.; writing—original draft preparation, M.T.J.H.; writing—review and editing,
M.T.J.H., C.P., P.M., and T.A.L.; supervision and project administration, M.T.J.H.; funding acquisition,
T.A.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding: This article was crowd-funded by public donations to the World Council for Health initiative.
Data Availability Statement: Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. Data on clinical
trials can be found at clinicaltrials.gov.
Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge the contributions of Francesca Havens, Dana F. Flavin,
and A.J. In addition, the authors acknowledge the seminal contributions of the FLCCC Alliance and
the publication of protocols for the management of the vaccine injured (https://COVIDCOVID1
9criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/i-prevent-vaccine-injury/, accessed on 15 April 2023).
Conflicts of Interest: M.T.J.H., C.P., and T.A.L. are on the Health and Science Committee of the World
Council for Health, a people-centered initiative of the not-for-profit Community Interest Company
(CIC) EbMCsquared, for advancing holistic health.
References
1. Ritchie, H.; Mathieu, E.; Rodés-Guirao, L.; Appel, C.; Giattino, C.; Ortiz-Ospina, E.; Hasell, J.; Macdonald, B.; Beltekian, D.; Roser,
M. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Our World in Data 2020. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/coronavirus
(accessed on 1 October 2022).
2. Staff, G. COVID-19 Vaccine Production to January 31st 2022. Available online: https://globalcommissionforpostpandemicpolicy.
org/covid-19-vaccine-production-to-january-31st-2022/ (accessed on 1 October 2022).
3. Halma, M.T.J.; Rose, J.; Lawrie, T. The Novelty of mRNA Viral Vaccines and Potential Harms: A Scoping Review. J 2023, 6,
220–235. [CrossRef]
4. ARCHIVE: Conditions of Authorisation for COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech (Regulation 174). Available online:
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/regulatory-approval-of-pfizer-biontech-vaccine-for-covid-19/conditions-of-
authorisation-for-pfizerbiontech-covid-19-vaccine (accessed on 1 October 2022).
5. Ball, P. The Lightning-Fast Quest for COVID Vaccines—and What It Means for Other Diseases. Nature 2020, 589, 16–18. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
6. Anand, P.; Stahel, V.P. Review the Safety of COVID-19 MRNA Vaccines: A Review. Patient Saf. Surg. 2021, 15, 20. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
7. Doshi, P. COVID-19 Vaccines: In the Rush for Regulatory Approval, Do We Need More Data? BMJ 2021, 373, n1244. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
8. Bondì, M.L.; Di Gesù, R.; Craparo, E.F. Chapter Twelve—Lipid Nanoparticles for Drug Targeting to the Brain. In Methods in
Enzymology; Düzgüneş, N., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2012; Volume 508, pp. 229–251.
9. Pottoo, F.H.; Sharma, S.; Javed, M.N.; Barkat, M.A.; Harshita; Alam, M.S.; Naim, M.J.; Alam, O.; Ansari, M.A.; Barreto, G.E.; et al.
Lipid-Based Nanoformulations in the Treatment of Neurological Disorders. Drug. Metab. Rev. 2020, 52, 185–204. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
10. Akinc, A.; Maier, M.A.; Manoharan, M.; Fitzgerald, K.; Jayaraman, M.; Barros, S.; Ansell, S.; Du, X.; Hope, M.J.; Madden, T.D.;
et al. The Onpattro Story and the Clinical Translation of Nanomedicines Containing Nucleic Acid-Based Drugs. Nat. Nanotechnol.
2019, 14, 1084–1087. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
11. Thacker, P.D. COVID-19: Researcher Blows the Whistle on Data Integrity Issues in Pfizer’s Vaccine Trial. BMJ 2021, 375, n2635.
[CrossRef]
12. Ogata, A.F.; Cheng, C.-A.; Desjardins, M.; Senussi, Y.; Sherman, A.C.; Powell, M.; Novack, L.; Von, S.; Li, X.; Baden, L.R.;
et al. Circulating Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccine Antigen Detected in the Plasma of
MRNA-1273 Vaccine Recipients. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2022, 74, 715–718. [CrossRef]
13. Bansal, S.; Perincheri, S.; Fleming, T.; Poulson, C.; Tiffany, B.; Bremner, R.M.; Mohanakumar, T. Cutting Edge: Circulating
Exosomes with COVID Spike Protein Are Induced by BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) Vaccination Prior to Development of
Antibodies: A Novel Mechanism for Immune Activation by MRNA Vaccines. J. Immunol. 2021, 207, 2405–2410. [CrossRef]
14. Röltgen, K.; Nielsen, S.C.A.; Silva, O.; Younes, S.F.; Zaslavsky, M.; Costales, C.; Yang, F.; Wirz, O.F.; Solis, D.; Hoh, R.A.; et al.
Immune Imprinting, Breadth of Variant Recognition, and Germinal Center Response in Human SARS-CoV-2 Infection and
Vaccination. Cell 2022, 185, 1025–1040.e14. [CrossRef]
15. Spike Protein Behavior. Available online: https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/spike-protein-behavior (accessed on 1
October 2022).
16. Schlake, T.; Thess, A.; Fotin-Mleczek, M.; Kallen, K.-J. Developing MRNA-Vaccine Technologies. RNA Biol. 2012, 9, 1319–1330.
[CrossRef]
17. Shyu, A.-B.; Wilkinson, M.F.; van Hoof, A. Messenger RNA Regulation: To Translate or to Degrade. EMBO J. 2008, 27, 471–481.
[CrossRef]
18. Baudrimont, A.; Voegeli, S.; Viloria, E.C.; Stritt, F.; Lenon, M.; Wada, T.; Jaquet, V.; Becskei, A. Multiplexed Gene Control Reveals
Rapid MRNA Turnover. Sci. Adv. 2017, 3, e1700006. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
19. Patterson, B.; Francisco, E.; Yogendra, R.; Long, E.; Pise, A.; Beaty, C.; Osgood, E.; Bream, J.; Kreimer, M.; Heide, R.V.; et al. SARS-
CoV-2 S1 Protein Persistence in SARS-CoV-2 Negative Post-Vaccination Individuals with Long COVID/PASC-Like Symptoms.
Res. Sq. 2022, Preprint. [CrossRef]
20. Patterson, B.K.; Francisco, E.B.; Yogendra, R.; Long, E.; Pise, A.; Rodrigues, H.; Hall, E.; Herrera, M.; Parikh, P.; Guevara-Coto, J.;
et al. Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months
Post-Infection. Front. Immunol. 2022, 12, 5526. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
21. Khan, S.; Shafiei, M.S.; Longoria, C.; Schoggins, J.W.; Savani, R.C.; Zaki, H. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Inflammation via
TLR2-Dependent Activation of the NF-KB Pathway. Elife 2021, 10, e68563. [CrossRef]
22. Robles, J.P.; Zamora, M.; Adan-Castro, E.; Siqueiros-Marquez, L.; Martinez de la Escalera, G.; Clapp, C. The Spike Protein of
SARS-CoV-2 Induces Endothelial Inflammation through Integrin A5β1 and NF-KB Signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2022, 298, 101695.
[CrossRef]
23. Banks, W.A.; Sharma, P.; Bullock, K.M.; Hansen, K.M.; Ludwig, N.; Whiteside, T.L. Transport of Extracellular Vesicles across the
Blood-Brain Barrier: Brain Pharmacokinetics and Effects of Inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4407. [CrossRef]
24. Chen, Y.Y.; Syed, A.M.; MacMillan, P.; Rocheleau, J.V.; Chan, W.C.W. Flow Rate Affects Nanoparticle Uptake into Endothelial
Cells. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, e1906274. [CrossRef]
25. Buzhdygan, T.P.; DeOre, B.J.; Baldwin-Leclair, A.; Bullock, T.A.; McGary, H.M.; Khan, J.A.; Razmpour, R.; Hale, J.F.; Galie, P.A.;
Potula, R.; et al. The SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Alters Barrier Function in 2D Static and 3D Microfluidic in-Vitro Models of the
Human Blood-Brain Barrier. Neurobiol. Dis. 2020, 146, 105131. [CrossRef]
26. Asandei, A.; Mereuta, L.; Schiopu, I.; Park, J.; Seo, C.H.; Park, Y.; Luchian, T. Non-Receptor-Mediated Lipid Membrane
Permeabilization by the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Subunit. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 55649–55658. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
27. Malhotra, A. Curing the Pandemic of Misinformation on COVID-19 MRNA Vaccines through Real Evidence-Based Medicine—
Part 1. J. Insul. Resist. 2022, 5, 8. [CrossRef]
28. Gill, J.R.; Tashjian, R.; Duncanson, E. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19
Vaccine Dose. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2022, 146, 925–929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
29. Diaz, G.A.; Parsons, G.T.; Gering, S.K.; Meier, A.R.; Hutchinson, I.V.; Robicsek, A. Myocarditis and Pericarditis After Vaccination
for COVID-19. JAMA 2021, 326, 1210–1212. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
30. Karlstad, Ø.; Hovi, P.; Husby, A.; Härkänen, T.; Selmer, R.M.; Pihlström, N.; Hansen, J.V.; Nohynek, H.; Gunnes, N.; Sundström,
A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and Myocarditis in a Nordic Cohort Study of 23 Million Residents. JAMA Cardiol. 2022, 7,
31. Patone, M.; Mei, X.W.; Handunnetthi, L.; Dixon, S.; Zaccardi, F.; Shankar-Hari, M.; Watkinson, P.; Khunti, K.; Harnden, A.;
Coupland, C.A.C.; et al. Risks of Myocarditis, Pericarditis, and Cardiac Arrhythmias Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination or
SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 410–422. [CrossRef]
32. Kracalik, I.; Oster, M.E.; Broder, K.R.; Cortese, M.M.; Glover, M.; Shields, K.; Creech, C.B.; Romanson, B.; Novosad, S.; Soslow,
J.; et al. Outcomes at Least 90 Days since Onset of Myocarditis after MRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Adolescents and Young
Adults in the USA: A Follow-up Surveillance Study. Lancet Child Adolesc. Health 2022, 6, 788–798. [CrossRef]
33. Mansanguan, S.; Charunwatthana, P.; Piyaphanee, W.; Dechkhajorn, W.; Poolcharoen, A.; Mansanguan, C. Cardiovascular
Manifestation of the BNT162b2 MRNA COVID-19 Vaccine in Adolescents. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. 2022, 7, 196. [CrossRef]
34. Tai, W.; He, L.; Zhang, X.; Pu, J.; Voronin, D.; Jiang, S.; Zhou, Y.; Du, L. Characterization of the Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) of
2019 Novel Coronavirus: Implication for Development of RBD Protein as a Viral Attachment Inhibitor and Vaccine. Cell Mol.
Immunol. 2020, 17, 613–620. [CrossRef]
35. Jackson, C.B.; Farzan, M.; Chen, B.; Choe, H. Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Entry into Cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 3–20.
[CrossRef]
36. Shin, Y.-H.; Jeong, K.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.J.; Yim, J.; Kim, J.; Kim, S.; Park, S.B. Inhibition of ACE2-Spike Interaction by an ACE2 Binder
Suppresses SARS-CoV-2 Entry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2022, 61, e202115695. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
37. Martínez-Flores, D.; Zepeda-Cervantes, J.; Cruz-Reséndiz, A.; Aguirre-Sampieri, S.; Sampieri, A.; Vaca, L. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines
Based on the Spike Glycoprotein and Implications of New Viral Variants. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 701501. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
38. Read, A.F.; Baigent, S.J.; Powers, C.; Kgosana, L.B.; Blackwell, L.; Smith, L.P.; Kennedy, D.A.; Walkden-Brown, S.W.; Nair, V.K.
Imperfect Vaccination Can Enhance the Transmission of Highly Virulent Pathogens. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13, e1002198. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
39. Lyngse, F.P.; Kirkeby, C.T.; Denwood, M.; Christiansen, L.E.; Mølbak, K.; Møller, C.H.; Skov, R.L.; Krause, T.G.; Rasmussen, M.;
Sieber, R.N.; et al. Household Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant of Concern Subvariants BA.1 and BA.2 in Denmark.
Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5760. [CrossRef]
40. López-Cortés, G.I.; Palacios-Pérez, M.; Zamudio, G.S.; Veledíaz, H.F.; Ortega, E.; José, M.V. Neutral Evolution Test of the Spike
Protein of SARS-CoV-2 and Its Implications in the Binding to ACE2. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 18847. [CrossRef]
41. Gupta, D.; Sharma, P.; Singh, M.; Kumar, M.; Ethayathulla, A.S.; Kaur, P. Structural and Functional Insights into the Spike Protein
Mutations of Emerging SARS-CoV-2 Variants. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2021, 78, 7967–7989. [CrossRef]
42. Davis, H.E.; McCorkell, L.; Vogel, J.M.; Topol, E.J. Long COVID: Major Findings, Mechanisms and Recommendations. Nat. Rev.
Microbiol. 2023, 21, 133–146. [CrossRef]
43. Mumtaz, A.; Sheikh, A.A.E.; Khan, A.M.; Khalid, S.N.; Khan, J.; Nasrullah, A.; Sagheer, S.; Sheikh, A.B. COVID-19 Vaccine and
Long COVID: A Scoping Review. Life 2022, 12, 1066. [CrossRef]
44. Loh, E.-W. Dose-Response Study a Glucoside- and Rutinoside-Rich Crude Material in Relieving Side Effects of COVID-19
Vaccines. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05387252 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
45. University of Oxford. Characterisation of the Effects of Spermidine, a Nutrition Supplement, on the Immune Memory Response
to Coronavirus Vaccine in Older People. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05421546 (accessed on
30 September 2022).
46. Université de Sherbrooke. Modulation of Immune Responses to COVID-19 Vaccination by an Intervention on the Gut Microbiota:
A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05195151 (accessed on 30
September 2022).
47. AB Biotek. Efficacy and Tolerability of a Nutritional Supplementation With ABBC-1, a Symbiotic Combination of Beta-Glucans
and Selenium and Zinc Enriched Probiotics, in Volunteers Receiving the Influenza or the COVID-19 Vaccines. 2022. Available
online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04798677 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
48. Maastricht University Medical Center. The Effect of Plant Stanol Ester Consumption on the Vaccination Response to a COVID-19
Vaccine. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04844346 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
49. Saxe, G. Multicenter Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled RCT of Fomitopsis Officinalis/Trametes Versicolor for COVID-19. 2022.
Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04951336 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
50. Engındenız, Z. Evaluation of Deltoid Muscle Exercises on Injection Site and Arm Pain After Pfizer—BioNTech (BNT162b2) COVID-
19 Vaccination, A Randomized Controlled Study. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05157230
(accessed on 30 September 2022).
51. Sanchez, J. Augmentation of Immune Response to COVID-19 MRNA Vaccination through Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment
Including Lymphatic Pumps. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04928456 (accessed on 30
September 2022).
52. Rowan University. Lymphatic Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine to Enhance COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy. 2022. Available
online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05069636 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
53. Bartley, J. Vaccination Efficacy With Metformin in Older Adults: A Pilot Study. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/
ct2/show/NCT03996538 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
54. Karanja, P.S. Iron and Vaccine-Preventable Viral Disease. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04912
661 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
55. Materia Medica Holding. Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized, Parallel-Group Clinical Trial to Evaluate
the Efficacy and Safety of Ergoferon as Non-Specific COVID-19 Prevention During Vaccination Against SARS-CoV-2. 2022.
56. Gnessi, L. COVID-19 Vaccination in Subjects With Obesity: Impact of Metabolic Health and the Role of a Ketogenic Diet. 2022.
57. Wang, A.X. Impact of Immunosuppression Adjustment on the Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 MRNA Vaccination in Kidney
Transplant Recipients (ADIVKT). 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05060991 (accessed on 30
September 2022).
58. University Hospital Inselspital, Berne. Registry Study for COVID19 Vaccination Efficacy in Patients With a Treatment History of
Rituximab. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04877496 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
59. Webster, K.E.; O’Byrne, L.; MacKeith, S.; Philpott, C.; Hopkins, C.; Burton, M.J. Interventions for the Prevention of Persistent
Post-COVID-19 Olfactory Dysfunction. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021, 2021, CD013877. [CrossRef]
60. Fertig, T.E.; Chitoiu, L.; Marta, D.S.; Ionescu, V.-S.; Cismasiu, V.B.; Radu, E.; Angheluta, G.; Dobre, M.; Serbanescu, A.; Hinescu,
M.E.; et al. Vaccine MRNA Can Be Detected in Blood at 15 Days Post-Vaccination. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1538. [CrossRef]
61. Bahl, K.; Senn, J.J.; Yuzhakov, O.; Bulychev, A.; Brito, L.A.; Hassett, K.J.; Laska, M.E.; Smith, M.; Almarsson, Ö.; Thompson, J.;
et al. Preclinical and Clinical Demonstration of Immunogenicity by MRNA Vaccines against H10N8 and H7N9 Influenza Viruses.
Mol. Ther. 2017, 25, 1316–1327. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
62. Hanna, N.; Heffes-Doon, A.; Lin, X.; Manzano De Mejia, C.; Botros, B.; Gurzenda, E.; Nayak, A. Detection of Messenger RNA
COVID-19 Vaccines in Human Breast Milk. JAMA Pediatr. 2022, 176, 1268. [CrossRef]
63. Nuovo, G.J.; Magro, C.; Shaffer, T.; Awad, H.; Suster, D.; Mikhail, S.; He, B.; Michaille, J.-J.; Liechty, B.; Tili, E. Endothelial Cell
Damage Is the Central Part of COVID-19 and a Mouse Model Induced by Injection of the S1 Subunit of the Spike Protein. Ann.
Diagn. Pathol. 2021, 51, 151682. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
64. Raghavan, S.; Kenchappa, D.B.; Leo, M.D. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Induces Degradation of Junctional Proteins That Maintain
Endothelial Barrier Integrity. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2021, 8, 687783. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
65. Lei, Y.; Zhang, J.; Schiavon, C.R.; He, M.; Chen, L.; Shen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Yin, Q.; Cho, Y.; Andrade, L.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Spike
Protein Impairs Endothelial Function via Downregulation of ACE 2. Circ. Res. 2021, 128, 1323–1326. [CrossRef]
66. Serviente, C.; Matias, A.; Erol, M.E.; Calderone, M.; Layec, G. The Influence of COVID-19-Based MRNA Vaccines on Measures of
Conduit Artery and Microvascular Endothelial Function. FASEB J. 2022, 36. [CrossRef]
67. Castanares-Zapatero, D.; Chalon, P.; Kohn, L.; Dauvrin, M.; Detollenaere, J.; Maertens de Noordhout, C.; Primus-de Jong, C.;
Cleemput, I.; Van den Heede, K. Pathophysiology and Mechanism of Long COVID: A Comprehensive Review. Ann. Med. 2022,
54, 1473–1487. [CrossRef]
68. Crook, H.; Raza, S.; Nowell, J.; Young, M.; Edison, P. Long Covid-Mechanisms, Risk Factors, and Management. BMJ 2021, 374,
n1648. [CrossRef]
69. Xie, Y.; Xu, E.; Bowe, B.; Al-Aly, Z. Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes of COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 583–590. [CrossRef]
70. Raman, B.; Bluemke, D.A.; Lüscher, T.F.; Neubauer, S. Long COVID: Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 with a Cardiovascular
Focus. Eur. Heart J. 2022, 43, 1157–1172. [CrossRef]
71. Yonker, L.M.; Swank, Z.; Bartsch, Y.C.; Burns, M.D.; Kane, A.; Boribong, B.P.; Davis, J.P.; Loiselle, M.; Novak, T.; Senussi, Y.; et al.
Circulating Spike Protein Detected in Post–COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine Myocarditis. Circulation 2023, 147, 867–876. [CrossRef]
72. Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Binds Platelet ACE2
to Enhance Thrombosis in COVID-19. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 120. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
73. Grobbelaar, L.M.; Venter, C.; Vlok, M.; Ngoepe, M.; Laubscher, G.J.; Lourens, P.J.; Steenkamp, J.; Kell, D.B.; Pretorius, E. SARS-
CoV-2 Spike Protein S1 Induces Fibrin(Ogen) Resistant to Fibrinolysis: Implications for Microclot Formation in COVID-19. Biosci.
Rep. 2021, 41, BSR20210611. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
74. Nyström, S.; Hammarström, P. Amyloidogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 8945–8950. [CrossRef]
75. Montgomery, J.; Ryan, M.; Engler, R.; Hoffman, D.; McClenathan, B.; Collins, L.; Loran, D.; Hrncir, D.; Herring, K.; Platzer, M.;
et al. Myocarditis Following Immunization With MRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in Members of the US Military. JAMA Cardiol. 2021,
6, 1202–1206. [CrossRef]
76. Chakraborty, C.; Bhattacharya, M.; Sharma, A.R. Present Variants of Concern and Variants of Interest of Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome Coronavirus 2: Their Significant Mutations in S-Glycoprotein, Infectivity, Re-Infectivity, Immune Escape and Vaccines
Activity. Rev. Med. Virol. 2022, 32, e2270. [CrossRef]
77. Harvey, W.T.; Carabelli, A.M.; Jackson, B.; Gupta, R.K.; Thomson, E.C.; Harrison, E.M.; Ludden, C.; Reeve, R.; Rambaut, A.;
Peacock, S.J.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Variants, Spike Mutations and Immune Escape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021, 19, 409–424. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
78. Collier, A.Y.; Miller, J.; Hachmann, N.P.; McMahan, K.; Liu, J.; Bondzie, E.A.; Gallup, L.; Rowe, M.; Schonberg, E.; Thai, S.; et al.
Immunogenicity of BA.5 Bivalent MRNA Vaccine Boosters. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023, 388, 565–567. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
79. Tian, J.-H.; Patel, N.; Haupt, R.; Zhou, H.; Weston, S.; Hammond, H.; Logue, J.; Portnoff, A.D.; Norton, J.; Guebre-Xabier, M.; et al.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Vaccine Candidate NVX-CoV2373 Immunogenicity in Baboons and Protection in Mice. Nat.
Commun. 2021, 12, 372. [CrossRef]
80. Chakraborty, C.; Sharma, A.R.; Bhattacharya, M.; Lee, S.-S. A Detailed Overview of Immune Escape, Antibody Escape, Partial
Vaccine Escape of SARS-CoV-2 and Their Emerging Variants With Escape Mutations. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 801522. [CrossRef]
81. Wan, Y.; Shang, J.; Sun, S.; Tai, W.; Chen, J.; Geng, Q.; He, L.; Chen, Y.; Wu, J.; Shi, Z.; et al. Molecular Mechanism for
Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Coronavirus Entry. J. Virol. 2020, 94, e02015-19. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
82. Regev-Yochay, G.; Gonen, T.; Gilboa, M.; Mandelboim, M.; Indenbaum, V.; Amit, S.; Meltzer, L.; Asraf, K.; Cohen, C.; Fluss, R.;
et al. Efficacy of a Fourth Dose of COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine against Omicron. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 1377–1380. [CrossRef]
83. Liu, J.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Xia, H.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Chen, W.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, R.; et al. Comprehensive Investigations
Revealed Consistent Pathophysiological Alterations after Vaccination with COVID-19 Vaccines. Cell Discov. 2021, 7, 99. [CrossRef]
84. Dennis, A.; Cuthbertson, D.J.; Wootton, D.; Crooks, M.; Gabbay, M.; Eichert, N.; Mouchti, S.; Pansini, M.; Roca-Fernandez, A.;
Thomaides-Brears, H.; et al. Multi-Organ Impairment and Long COVID: A 1-Year Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study. J. R.
Soc. Med. 2023, 116, 97–112. [CrossRef]
85. Mustafa Alhussein, M.; Rabbani, M.; Sarak, B.; Dykstra, S.; Labib, D.; Flewitt, J.; Lydell, C.P.; Howarth, A.G.; Filipchuck, N.;
Kealey, A.; et al. Natural History of Myocardial Injury After COVID-19 Vaccine–Associated Myocarditis. Can. J. Cardiol. 2022, 38,
1676–1683. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
86. Abbott, M.G.; Allawi, Z.; Hofer, M.; Ansorge, O.; Brady, S.; Fadic, R.; Torres, G.; Knight, R.; Calvo, M.; Bennett, D.L.H.; et al.
Acute Small Fiber Neuropathy after Oxford-AstraZeneca ChAdOx1-S Vaccination: A Report of Three Cases and Review of the
Literature. J. Peripher. Nerv. Syst. 2022, 27, 325–329. [CrossRef]
87. Khokhar, F.; Khan, A.; Hussain, Z.; Yu, J. Small Fiber Neuropathy Associated With the Moderna SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Cureus
2022, 14, e25969. [CrossRef]
88. Frontera, J.A.; Tamborska, A.A.; Doheim, M.F.; Garcia-Azorin, D.; Gezegen, H.; Guekht, A.; Yusof Khan, A.H.K.; Santacatterina,
M.; Sejvar, J.; Thakur, K.T.; et al. Neurological Events Reported after COVID-19 Vaccines: An Analysis of Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System. Ann. Neurol. 2022, 91, 756–771. [CrossRef]
89. Ayoubkhani, D.; Bermingham, C.; Pouwels, K.B.; Glickman, M.; Nafilyan, V.; Zaccardi, F.; Khunti, K.; Alwan, N.A.; Walker, A.S.
Trajectory of Long Covid Symptoms after COVID-19 Vaccination: Community Based Cohort Study. BMJ 2022, 377, e069676.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
90. Schwab, C.; Domke, L.M.; Hartmann, L.; Stenzinger, A.; Longerich, T.; Schirmacher, P. Autopsy-Based Histopathological
Characterization of Myocarditis after Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Vaccination. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2023, 112, 431–440. [CrossRef]
91. Rosenblum, H.G.; Gee, J.; Liu, R.; Marquez, P.L.; Zhang, B.; Strid, P.; Abara, W.E.; McNeil, M.M.; Myers, T.R.; Hause, A.M.; et al.
Safety of MRNA Vaccines Administered during the Initial 6 Months of the US COVID-19 Vaccination Programme: An Observational
Study of Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-Safe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2022, 22, 802–812. [CrossRef]
92. Dickerman, B.A.; Madenci, A.L.; Gerlovin, H.; Kurgansky, K.E.; Wise, J.K.; Figueroa Muñiz, M.J.; Ferolito, B.R.; Gagnon, D.R.;
Gaziano, J.M.; Cho, K.; et al. Comparative Safety of BNT162b2 and MRNA-1273 Vaccines in a Nationwide Cohort of US Veterans.
JAMA Intern. Med. 2022, 182, 739–746. [CrossRef]
93. Ponti, G.; Pastorino, L.; Manfredini, M.; Ozben, T.; Oliva, G.; Kaleci, S.; Iannella, R.; Tomasi, A. COVID-19 Spreading across World
Correlates with C677T Allele of the Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (MTHFR) Gene Prevalence. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2021, 35,
e23798. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
94. Carpenè, G.; Negrini, D.; Henry, B.M.; Montagnana, M.; Lippi, G. Homocysteine in Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A
Systematic Literature Review. Diagnosis 2022, 9, 306–310. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
95. Ponti, G.; Roli, L.; Oliva, G.; Manfredini, M.; Trenti, T.; Kaleci, S.; Iannella, R.; Balzano, B.; Coppola, A.; Fiorentino, G.; et al.
Homocysteine (Hcy) Assessment to Predict Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Multicenter Study on 313 COVID-19
Patients. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2021, 59, e354–e357. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
96. Abu-Farha, M.; Al-Sabah, S.; Hammad, M.M.; Hebbar, P.; Channanath, A.M.; John, S.E.; Taher, I.; Almaeen, A.; Ghazy, A.;
Mohammad, A.; et al. Prognostic Genetic Markers for Thrombosis in COVID-19 Patients: A Focused Analysis on D-Dimer,
Homocysteine and Thromboembolism. Front Pharm. 2020, 11, 587451. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
97. Karst, M.; Hollenhorst, J.; Achenbach, J. Life-Threatening Course in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Is There a Link to
Methylenetetrahydrofolic Acid Reductase (MTHFR) Polymorphism and Hyperhomocysteinemia? Med. Hypotheses 2020, 144,
110234. [CrossRef]
98. Bruce Yu, Y.; Taraban, M.B.; Briggs, K.T. All Vials Are Not the Same: Potential Role of Vaccine Quality in Vaccine Adverse
Reactions. Vaccine 2021, 39, 6565–6569. [CrossRef]
99. Shrestha, N.K.; Burke, P.C.; Nowacki, A.S.; Simon, J.F.; Hagen, A.; Gordon, S.M. Effectiveness of the Coronavirus Disease 2019
(COVID-19) Bivalent Vaccine. medRxiv 2023. [CrossRef]
100. Hoffmann, M.A.; Wieler, H.J.; Enders, P.; Buchholz, H.-G.; Plachter, B. Age- and Sex-Graded Data Evaluation of Vaccination
Reactions after Initial Injection of the BNT162b2 MRNA Vaccine in a Local Vaccination Center in Germany. Vaccines 2021, 9, 911.
[CrossRef]
101. Aaby, P.; Benn, C.S.; Flanagan, K.L.; Klein, S.L.; Kollmann, T.R.; Lynn, D.J.; Shann, F. The Non-Specific and Sex-Differential Effects
of Vaccines. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 20, 464–470. [CrossRef]
102. Desai, A.P.; Desai, A.P.; Loomis, G.J. Relationship between Pre-Existing Allergies and Anaphylactic Reactions Post MRNA
COVID-19 Vaccine Administration. Vaccine 2021, 39, 4407–4409. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
103. Lee, E.-J.; Beltrami-Moreira, M.; Al-Samkari, H.; Cuker, A.; DiRaimo, J.; Gernsheimer, T.; Kruse, A.; Kessler, C.; Kruse, C.; Leavitt,
A.D.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination and ITP in Patients with de Novo or Preexisting ITP. Blood 2022, 139, 1564–1574. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
104. Iddir, M.; Brito, A.; Dingeo, G.; Fernandez Del Campo, S.S.; Samouda, H.; La Frano, M.R.; Bohn, T. Strengthening the Immune
System and Reducing Inflammation and Oxidative Stress through Diet and Nutrition: Considerations during the COVID-19
Crisis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1562. [CrossRef]
105. Nakeshbandi, M.; Maini, R.; Daniel, P.; Rosengarten, S.; Parmar, P.; Wilson, C.; Kim, J.M.; Oommen, A.; Mecklenburg, M.; Salvani,
J.; et al. The Impact of Obesity on COVID-19 Complications: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Obes. 2020, 44, 1832–1837.
[CrossRef]
106. Apicella, M.; Campopiano, M.C.; Mantuano, M.; Mazoni, L.; Coppelli, A.; Del Prato, S. COVID-19 in People with Diabetes:
Understanding the Reasons for Worse Outcomes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020, 8, 782–792. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
107. Logette, E.; Lorin, C.; Favreau, C.; Oshurko, E.; Coggan, J.S.; Casalegno, F.; Sy, M.F.; Monney, C.; Bertschy, M.; Delattre, E.; et al. A
Machine-Generated View of the Role of Blood Glucose Levels in the Severity of COVID-19. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 695139.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
108. Holt, E.M.; Steffen, L.M.; Moran, A.; Basu, S.; Steinberger, J.; Ross, J.A.; Hong, C.-P.; Sinaiko, A.R. Fruit and Vegetable Consumption
and Its Relation to Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Adolescents. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 2009, 109, 414–421. [CrossRef]
109. Cheng, Y.-C.; Sheen, J.-M.; Hu, W.L.; Hung, Y.-C. Polyphenols and Oxidative Stress in Atherosclerosis-Related Ischemic Heart
Disease and Stroke. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 8526438. [CrossRef]
110. Serino, A.; Salazar, G. Protective Role of Polyphenols against Vascular Inflammation, Aging and Cardiovascular Disease. Nutrients
2018, 11, 53. [CrossRef]
111. Belkaid, Y.; Hand, T.W. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and Inflammation. Cell 2014, 157, 121–141. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
112. Yeoh, Y.K.; Zuo, T.; Lui, G.C.-Y.; Zhang, F.; Liu, Q.; Li, A.Y.; Chung, A.C.; Cheung, C.P.; Tso, E.Y.; Fung, K.S.; et al. Gut Microbiota
Composition Reflects Disease Severity and Dysfunctional Immune Responses in Patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021, 70, 698–706.
[CrossRef]
113. Zuo, T.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, F.; Lui, G.; Tso, E.; Yeoh, Y.K.; Chen, Z.; Boon, S.; Chan, F.K.L.; Chan, P.; et al. Depicting SARS-CoV-2 Faecal
Viral Activity in Association with Gut Microbiota Composition in Patients with COVID-19. Gut 2021, 70, 276–284. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
114. Ferreira, C.; Viana, S.D.; Reis, F. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis–Immune Hyperresponse–Inflammation Triad in Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19): Impact of Pharmacological and Nutraceutical Approaches. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1514. [CrossRef]
115. Wang, C.; van Haperen, R.; Gutiérrez-Álvarez, J.; Li, W.; Okba, N.M.A.; Albulescu, I.; Widjaja, I.; van Dieren, B.; Fernandez-
Delgado, R.; Sola, I.; et al. A Conserved Immunogenic and Vulnerable Site on the Coronavirus Spike Protein Delineated by
Cross-Reactive Monoclonal Antibodies. Nat. Commun. 2021, 12, 1715. [CrossRef]
116. Li, F. Structure, Function, and Evolution of Coronavirus Spike Proteins. Annu. Rev. Virol. 2016, 3, 237–261. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
117. Pollard, T.D. A Guide to Simple and Informative Binding Assays. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21, 4061–4067. [CrossRef]
118. Baer, A.; Kehn-Hall, K. Viral Concentration Determination Through Plaque Assays: Using Traditional and Novel Overlay Systems.
J. Vis. Exp. 2014, 52065. [CrossRef]
119. Puren, A.; Gerlach, J.L.; Weigl, B.H.; Kelso, D.M.; Domingo, G.J. Laboratory Operations, Specimen Processing, and Handling for
Viral Load Testing and Surveillance. J. Infect. Dis. 2010, 201 (Suppl. 1), S27–S36. [CrossRef]
120. Gillette, J.R. Problems in Correlating InVitro and InVivo Studies of Drug Metabolism. In Pharmacokinetics: A Modern View; Benet,
L.Z., Levy, G., Ferraiolo, B.L., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1984; pp. 235–252. ISBN 978-1-4613-2799-8.
121. Faraoni, D.; Schaefer, S.T. Randomized Controlled Trials vs. Observational Studies: Why Not Just Live Together? BMC Anesth.
2016, 16, 102. [CrossRef]
122. Islam, A.; Bashir, M.S.; Joyce, K.; Rashid, H.; Laher, I.; Elshazly, S. An Update on COVID-19 Vaccine Induced Thrombotic
Thrombocytopenia Syndrome and Some Management Recommendations. Molecules 2021, 26, 5004. [CrossRef]
123. Thomas, G.; Couture, F.; Kwiatkowska, A. The Path to Therapeutic Furin Inhibitors: From Yeast Pheromones to SARS-CoV-2. Int.
J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 3435. [CrossRef]
124. Cheng, Y.-W.; Chao, T.-L.; Li, C.-L.; Chiu, M.-F.; Kao, H.-C.; Wang, S.-H.; Pang, Y.-H.; Lin, C.-H.; Tsai, Y.-M.; Lee, W.-H.; et al.
Furin Inhibitors Block SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Cleavage to Suppress Virus Production and Cytopathic Effects. Cell Rep. 2020,
33, 108254. [CrossRef]
125. Wu, C.; Zheng, M.; Yang, Y.; Gu, X.; Yang, K.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, P.; Wang, Y.; et al. Furin: A Potential Therapeutic
Target for COVID-19. iScience 2020, 23, 101642. [CrossRef]
126. Mykytyn, A.Z.; Breugem, T.I.; Riesebosch, S.; Schipper, D.; van den Doel, P.B.; Rottier, R.J.; Lamers, M.M.; Haagmans, B.L.
SARS-CoV-2 Entry into Human Airway Organoids Is Serine Protease-Mediated and Facilitated by the Multibasic Cleavage Site.
eLife 2021, 10, e64508. [CrossRef]
127. Rosendal, E.; Mihai, I.S.; Becker, M.; Das, D.; Frängsmyr, L.; Persson, B.D.; Rankin, G.D.; Gröning, R.; Trygg, J.; Forsell, M.; et al.
Serine Protease Inhibitors Restrict Host Susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 Infections. mBio 2022, 13, e0089222. [CrossRef]
128. Shulla, A.; Heald-Sargent, T.; Subramanya, G.; Zhao, J.; Perlman, S.; Gallagher, T. A Transmembrane Serine Protease Is Linked to
the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Receptor and Activates Virus Entry. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 873–882. [CrossRef]
129. Lu, J.; Hou, Y.; Ge, S.; Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Hu, T.; Lv, Y.; He, H.; Wang, C. Screened Antipsychotic Drugs Inhibit SARS-CoV-2
Binding with ACE2 in Vitro. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118889. [CrossRef]
130. Su, S.; Chen, J.; Wang, Y.; Wong, L.M.; Zhu, Z.; Jiang, G.; Liu, P. Lenalidomide Downregulates ACE2 Protein Abundance
to Alleviate Infection by SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Conditioned Pseudoviruses. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2021, 6, 186.
[CrossRef]
131. Ramadan, A.A.; Mayilsamy, K.; McGill, A.R.; Ghosh, A.; Giulianotti, M.A.; Donow, H.M.; Mohapatra, S.S.; Mohapatra, S.;
Chandran, B.; Deschenes, R.J.; et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Palmitoylation Reduces Virus Infectivity. bioRxiv
2021. [CrossRef]
132. Rajpoot, S.; Ohishi, T.; Kumar, A.; Pan, Q.; Banerjee, S.; Zhang, K.Y.J.; Baig, M.S. A Novel Therapeutic Peptide Blocks SARS-CoV-2
Spike Protein Binding with Host Cell ACE2 Receptor. Drugs R&D 2021, 21, 273–283. [CrossRef]
133. Kruse, K.B.; Brodsky, J.L.; McCracken, A.A. Autophagy: An ER Protein Quality Control Process. Autophagy 2006, 2, 135–137.
[CrossRef]
134. De, R.; Dutta, S. Role of the Microbiome in the Pathogenesis of COVID-19. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 736397. [CrossRef]
135. Ramakrishnan, R.K.; Kashour, T.; Hamid, Q.; Halwani, R.; Tleyjeh, I.M. Unraveling the Mystery Surrounding Post-Acute Sequelae
of COVID-19. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 686029. [CrossRef]
136. Haran, J.P.; Bradley, E.; Zeamer, A.L.; Cincotta, L.; Salive, M.-C.; Dutta, P.; Mutaawe, S.; Anya, O.; Meza-Segura, M.; Moormann,
A.M.; et al. Inflammation-Type Dysbiosis of the Oral Microbiome Associates with the Duration of COVID-19 Symptoms and
Long COVID. JCI Insight 2021, 6, e152346. [CrossRef]
137. Proal, A.D.; VanElzakker, M.B. Long COVID or Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): An Overview of Biological Factors
That May Contribute to Persistent Symptoms. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 698169. [CrossRef]
138. Hazan, S.; Stollman, N.; Bozkurt, H.S.; Dave, S.; Papoutsis, A.J.; Daniels, J.; Barrows, B.D.; Quigley, E.M.; Borody, T.J. Lost
Microbes of COVID-19: Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium Depletion and Decreased Microbiome Diversity Associated with
SARS-CoV-2 Infection Severity. BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2022, 9, e000871. [CrossRef]
139. Gutiérrez-Castrellón, P.; Gandara-Martí, T.; Abreu Y Abreu, A.T.; Nieto-Rufino, C.D.; López-Orduña, E.; Jiménez-Escobar, I.;
Jiménez-Gutiérrez, C.; López-Velazquez, G.; Espadaler-Mazo, J. Probiotic Improves Symptomatic and Viral Clearance in Covid19
Outpatients: A Randomized, Quadruple-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Gut Microbes 2022, 14, 2018899. [CrossRef]
140. Chen, Y.; Gu, S.; Chen, Y.; Lu, H.; Shi, D.; Guo, J.; Wu, W.-R.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, K.-J.; et al. Six-Month Follow-up of Gut Microbiota
Richness in Patients with COVID-19. Gut 2022, 71, 222–225. [CrossRef]
141. Zuo, T.; Wu, X.; Wen, W.; Lan, P. Gut Microbiome Alterations in COVID-19. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 2021, 19, 679–688.
[CrossRef]
142. Hibino, S.; Hayashida, K. Modifiable Host Factors for the Prevention and Treatment of COVID-19: Diet and Lifestyle/Diet and
Lifestyle Factors in the Prevention of COVID-19. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1876. [CrossRef]
143. Losso, J.N.; Losso, M.N.; Toc, M.; Inungu, J.N.; Finley, J.W. The Young Age and Plant-Based Diet Hypothesis for Low SARS-CoV-2
Infection and COVID-19 Pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2021, 76, 270–280. [CrossRef]
144. Brown, R.B. Low Dietary Sodium Potentially Mediates COVID-19 Prevention Associated with Whole-Food Plant-Based Diets. Br.
J. Nutr. 2022, 129, 1136–1141. [CrossRef]
145. Kim, H.; Rebholz, C.M.; Hegde, S.; LaFiura, C.; Raghavan, M.; Lloyd, J.F.; Cheng, S.; Seidelmann, S.B. Plant-Based Diets,
Pescatarian Diets and COVID-19 Severity: A Population-Based Case–Control Study in Six Countries. BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2021,
4, 257–266. [CrossRef]
146. Benton, D.; Williams, C.; Brown, A. Impact of Consuming a Milk Drink Containing a Probiotic on Mood and Cognition. Eur. J.
Clin. Nutr. 2007, 61, 355–361. [CrossRef]
147. de Falco, B.; Amato, M.; Lanzotti, V. Chia Seeds Products: An Overview. Phytochem. Rev. 2017, 16, 745–760. [CrossRef]
148. Mao, Y.-H.; Xu, Y.; Song, F.; Wang, Z.-M.; Li, Y.-H.; Zhao, M.; He, F.; Tian, Z.; Yang, Y. Protective Effects of Konjac Glucomannan
on Gut Microbiome with Antibiotic Perturbation in Mice. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 290, 119476. [CrossRef]
149. Zhang, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Yang, W.; Song, G.; Zhong, P.; Ren, Y.; Zhong, G. Structural Complexity of Konjac Glucomannan and Its
Derivatives Governs the Diversity and Outputs of Gut Microbiota. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 292, 119639. [CrossRef]
150. Thomas, R.; Aldous, J.; Forsyth, R.; Chater, A.; Williams, M. The Influence of a Blend of Probiotic Lactobacillus and Prebiotic
Inulin on the Duration and Severity of Symptoms among Individuals with COVID-19. Infect. Dis. Diagn. Treat. 2021, 5, 1–12.
151. Wastyk, H.C.; Fragiadakis, G.K.; Perelman, D.; Dahan, D.; Merrill, B.D.; Yu, F.B.; Topf, M.; Gonzalez, C.G.; Treuren, W.V.; Han, S.;
et al. Gut-Microbiota-Targeted Diets Modulate Human Immune Status. Cell 2021, 184, 4137–4153.e14. [CrossRef]
152. Rossi, G.A.; Sacco, O.; Mancino, E.; Cristiani, L.; Midulla, F. Differences and Similarities between SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2:
Spike Receptor-Binding Domain Recognition and Host Cell Infection with Support of Cellular Serine Proteases. Infection 2020, 48,
153. Petersen, E.; Koopmans, M.; Go, U.; Hamer, D.H.; Petrosillo, N.; Castelli, F.; Storgaard, M.; Khalili, S.A.; Simonsen, L. Comparing
SARS-CoV-2 with SARS-CoV and Influenza Pandemics. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, e238–e244. [CrossRef]
154. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Pöhlmann, S. A Multibasic Cleavage Site in the Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Is Essential for
Infection of Human Lung Cells. Mol. Cell 2020, 78, 779–784.e5. [CrossRef]
155. Coutard, B.; Valle, C.; de Lamballerie, X.; Canard, B.; Seidah, N.G.; Decroly, E. The Spike Glycoprotein of the New Coronavirus
2019-NCoV Contains a Furin-like Cleavage Site Absent in CoV of the Same Clade. Antivir. Res. 2020, 176, 104742. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
156. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Krüger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.;
Nitsche, A.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell Entry Depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is Blocked by a Clinically Proven Protease
Inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 271–280.e8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
157. Hansen, T.; Titze, U.; Kulamadayil-Heidenreich, N.S.A.; Glombitza, S.; Tebbe, J.J.; Röcken, C.; Schulz, B.; Weise, M.; Wilkens, L.
First Case of Postmortem Study in a Patient Vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021, 107, 172–175. [CrossRef]
158. Polack, F.P.; Thomas, S.J.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Pérez Marc, G.; Moreira, E.D.; Zerbini, C.;
et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 MRNA COVID-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2603–2615. [CrossRef]
159. Corbett, K.S.; Flynn, B.; Foulds, K.E.; Francica, J.R.; Boyoglu-Barnum, S.; Werner, A.P.; Flach, B.; O’Connell, S.; Bock, K.W.;
Minai, M.; et al. Evaluation of the MRNA-1273 Vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 in Nonhuman Primates. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383,
1544–1555. [CrossRef]
160. Bos, R.; Rutten, L.; van der Lubbe, J.E.M.; Bakkers, M.J.G.; Hardenberg, G.; Wegmann, F.; Zuijdgeest, D.; de Wilde, A.H.;
Koornneef, A.; Verwilligen, A.; et al. Ad26 Vector-Based COVID-19 Vaccine Encoding a Prefusion-Stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spike
Immunogen Induces Potent Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses. Npj Vaccines 2020, 5, 91. [CrossRef]
161. Bangaru, S.; Ozorowski, G.; Turner, H.L.; Antanasijevic, A.; Huang, D.; Wang, X.; Torres, J.L.; Diedrich, J.K.; Tian, J.-H.; Portnoff,
A.D.; et al. Structural Analysis of Full-Length SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein from an Advanced Vaccine Candidate. Science 2020, 370,
1089–1094. [CrossRef]
162. Pallesen, J.; Wang, N.; Corbett, K.S.; Wrapp, D.; Kirchdoerfer, R.N.; Turner, H.L.; Cottrell, C.A.; Becker, M.M.; Wang, L.; Shi, W.;
et al. Immunogenicity and Structures of a Rationally Designed Prefusion MERS-CoV Spike Antigen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
2017, 114, E7348–E7357. [CrossRef]
163. Watanabe, Y.; Mendonça, L.; Allen, E.R.; Howe, A.; Lee, M.; Allen, J.D.; Chawla, H.; Pulido, D.; Donnellan, F.; Davies, H.; et al.
Native-like SARS-CoV-2 Spike Glycoprotein Expressed by ChAdOx1 NCoV-19/AZD1222 Vaccine. ACS Cent. Sci. 2021, 7, 594–602.
[CrossRef]
164. Gao, Q.; Bao, L.; Mao, H.; Wang, L.; Xu, K.; Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Zhu, L.; Wang, N.; Lv, Z.; et al. Development of an Inactivated Vaccine
Candidate for SARS-CoV-2. Science 2020, 369, 77–81. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
165. Lu, M.; Chamblee, M.; Zhang, Y.; Ye, C.; Dravid, P.; Park, J.-G.; Mahesh, K.; Trivedi, S.; Murthy, S.; Sharma, H.; et al. SARS-CoV-2
Prefusion Spike Protein Stabilized by Six Rather than Two Prolines Is More Potent for Inducing Antibodies That Neutralize Viral
Variants of Concern. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2022, 119, e2110105119. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
166. Amanat, F.; Strohmeier, S.; Rathnasinghe, R.; Schotsaert, M.; Coughlan, L.; García-Sastre, A.; Krammer, F. Introduction of Two
Prolines and Removal of the Polybasic Cleavage Site Lead to Higher Efficacy of a Recombinant Spike-Based SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine
in the Mouse Model. mBio 2021, 12, e02648-20. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
167. Murza, A.; Dion, S.P.; Boudreault, P.-L.; Désilets, A.; Leduc, R.; Marsault, É. Inhibitors of Type II Transmembrane Serine Proteases
in the Treatment of Diseases of the Respiratory Tract—A Review of Patent Literature. Expert. Opin. Pat. 2020, 30, 807–824.
[CrossRef]
168. Rahman, N.; Basharat, Z.; Yousuf, M.; Castaldo, G.; Rastrelli, L.; Khan, H. Virtual Screening of Natural Products against Type
II Transmembrane Serine Protease (TMPRSS2), the Priming Agent of Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Molecules 2020, 25, 2271.
[CrossRef]
169. Azouz, N.P.; Klingler, A.M.; Callahan, V.; Akhrymuk, I.V.; Elez, K.; Raich, L.; Henry, B.M.; Benoit, J.L.; Benoit, S.W.; Noé, F.; et al.
Alpha 1 Antitrypsin Is an Inhibitor of the SARS-CoV-2-Priming Protease TMPRSS2. Pathog. Immun. 2021, 6, 55–74. [CrossRef]
170. Longo, V.D.; Mattson, M.P. Fasting: Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications. Cell Metab. 2014, 19, 181–192. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
171. Bagherniya, M.; Butler, A.E.; Barreto, G.E.; Sahebkar, A. The Effect of Fasting or Calorie Restriction on Autophagy Induction: A
Review of the Literature. Ageing Res. Rev. 2018, 47, 183–197. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
172. Brandhorst, S.; Longo, V.D. Protein Quantity and Source, Fasting-Mimicking Diets, and Longevity. Adv. Nutr. 2019, 10, S340–S350.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
173. Shuvayeva, G.; Bobak, Y.; Igumentseva, N.; Titone, R.; Morani, F.; Stasyk, O.; Isidoro, C. Single Amino Acid Arginine Deprivation
Triggers Prosurvival Autophagic Response in Ovarian Carcinoma SKOV3. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 505041. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
174. Horne, B.D.; May, H.T.; Muhlestein, J.B.; Le, V.T.; Bair, T.L.; Knowlton, K.U.; Anderson, J.L. Association of Periodic Fasting with
Lower Severity of COVID-19 Outcomes in the SARS-CoV-2 Prevaccine Era: An Observational Cohort from the INSPIRE Registry.
BMJ Nutr. Prev. Health 2022, 5, 145–153. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
175. Nishimura, K.; Shiina, R.; Kashiwagi, K.; Igarashi, K. Decrease in Polyamines with Aging and Their Ingestion from Food and
Drink. J. Biochem. 2006, 139, 81–90. [CrossRef]
176. Eisenberg, T.; Knauer, H.; Schauer, A.; Büttner, S.; Ruckenstuhl, C.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Ring, J.; Schroeder, S.; Magnes, C.;
Antonacci, L.; et al. Induction of Autophagy by Spermidine Promotes Longevity. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11, 1305–1314. [CrossRef]
177. Summers, C.M.; Valentine, R.J. Acute Heat Exposure Alters Autophagy Signaling in C2C12 Myotubes. Front. Physiol. 2020, 10,
1521. [CrossRef]
178. McCormick, J.J.; Dokladny, K.; Moseley, P.L.; Kenny, G.P. Autophagy and Heat: A Potential Role for Heat Therapy to Improve
Autophagic Function in Health and Disease. J. Appl. Physiol. 2021, 130, 1–9. [CrossRef]
179. D’Arcy, M.S. A Review of Biologically Active Flavonoids as Inducers of Autophagy and Apoptosis in Neoplastic Cells and as
Cytoprotective Agents in Non-Neoplastic Cells. Cell Biol. Int. 2022, 46, 1179–1195. [CrossRef]
180. Hasima, N.; Ozpolat, B. Regulation of Autophagy by Polyphenolic Compounds as a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for Cancer.
Cell Death Dis. 2014, 5, e1509. [CrossRef]
181. Lin, S.-R.; Fu, Y.-S.; Tsai, M.-J.; Cheng, H.; Weng, C.-F. Natural Compounds from Herbs That Can Potentially Execute as Autophagy
Inducers for Cancer Therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1412. [CrossRef]
182. Pietrocola, F.; Malik, S.A.; Mariño, G.; Vacchelli, E.; Senovilla, L.; Chaba, K.; Niso-Santano, M.; Maiuri, M.C.; Madeo, F.; Kroemer,
G. Coffee Induces Autophagy in Vivo. Cell Cycle 2014, 13, 1987–1994. [CrossRef]
183. Ferraresi, A.; Titone, R.; Follo, C.; Castiglioni, A.; Chiorino, G.; Dhanasekaran, D.N.; Isidoro, C. The Protein Restriction Mimetic
Resveratrol Is an Autophagy Inducer Stronger than Amino Acid Starvation in Ovarian Cancer Cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2017, 56,
2681–2691. [CrossRef]
184. Lu, G.; Wu, Z.; Shang, J.; Xie, Z.; Chen, C.; Zhang, C. The Effects of Metformin on Autophagy. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2021, 137,
111286. [CrossRef]
185. Guo, J.; Nie, J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Hu, H.; Xu, J.; Lu, J.; Ma, L.; Ji, H.; Yuan, J.; et al. Cold Exposure-Induced Endoplasmic
Reticulum Stress Regulates Autophagy through the SIRT2/FoxO1 Signaling Pathway. J. Cell. Physiol. 2022, 237, 3960–3970.
[CrossRef]
186. Yau, W.W.; Wong, K.A.; Zhou, J.; Thimmukonda, N.K.; Wu, Y.; Bay, B.-H.; Singh, B.K.; Yen, P.M. Chronic Cold Exposure Induces
Autophagy to Promote Fatty Acid Oxidation, Mitochondrial Turnover, and Thermogenesis in Brown Adipose Tissue. iScience
2021, 24, 102434. [CrossRef]
187. Wang, Y.-C.; Zhang, S.; Du, T.-Y.; Wang, B.; Sun, X.-Q. Hyperbaric Oxygen Preconditioning Reduces Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury
by Stimulating Autophagy in Neurocyte. Brain Res. 2010, 1323, 149–151. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
188. Sun, P.; Xu, W.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, C.; Lin, X.; Gong, M.; Fu, Z. Ozone Induces Autophagy by Activating PPARγ/MTOR in Rat
Chondrocytes Treated with IL-1β. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2022, 17, 351. [CrossRef]
189. Mojtabavi, H.; Saghazadeh, A.; Rezaei, N. Interleukin-6 and Severe COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur.
Cytokine Netw. 2020, 31, 44–49. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
190. Kell, D.B.; Laubscher, G.J.; Pretorius, E. A Central Role for Amyloid Fibrin Microclots in Long COVID/PASC: Origins and
Therapeutic Implications. Biochem. J. 2022, 479, 537–559. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
191. Pretorius, E.; Vlok, M.; Venter, C.; Bezuidenhout, J.A.; Laubscher, G.J.; Steenkamp, J.; Kell, D.B. Persistent Clotting Protein
Pathology in Long COVID/Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) Is Accompanied by Increased Levels of Antiplasmin.
Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2021, 20, 172. [CrossRef]
192. Pretorius, E.; Venter, C.; Laubscher, G.J.; Kotze, M.J.; Oladejo, S.O.; Watson, L.R.; Rajaratnam, K.; Watson, B.W.; Kell, D.B.
Prevalence of Symptoms, Comorbidities, Fibrin Amyloid Microclots and Platelet Pathology in Individuals with Long COVID/Post-
Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). Cardiovasc. Diabetol. 2022, 21, 148. [CrossRef]
193. Chang, J.C.; Hawley, H.B. Vaccine-Associated Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis: Venous Endotheliopathy Leading to Venous
Combined Micro-Macrothrombosis. Medicina 2021, 57, 1163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
194. Mainous, A.G.; Rooks, B.J.; Orlando, F.A. The Impact of Initial COVID-19 Episode Inflammation Among Adults on Mortality
Within 12 Months Post-Hospital Discharge. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 891375. [CrossRef]
195. Aydınyılmaz, F.; Aksakal, E.; Pamukcu, H.E.; Aydemir, S.; Doğan, R.; Saraç, İ.; Aydın, S.Ş.; Kalkan, K.; Gülcü, O.; Tanboğa, İ.H.
Significance of MPV, RDW and PDW with the Severity and Mortality of COVID-19 and Effects of Acetylsalicylic Acid Use. Clin.
Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2021, 27, 10760296211048808. [CrossRef]
196. Bianconi, V.; Violi, F.; Fallarino, F.; Pignatelli, P.; Sahebkar, A.; Pirro, M. Is Acetylsalicylic Acid a Safe and Potentially Useful
Choice for Adult Patients with COVID-19 ? Drugs 2020, 80, 1383–1396. [CrossRef]
197. Clissold, S.P. Aspirin and Related Derivatives of Salicylic Acid. Drugs 1986, 32, 8–26. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
198. Storstein, O.; Nitter-Hauge, S.; Enge, I. Thromboembolic Complications in Coronary Angiography: Prevention with Acetyl-
Salicylic Acid. Acta Radiol. Diagn. 1977, 18, 555–560. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
199. Østerud, B.; Brox, J.H. The Clotting Time of Whole Blood in Plastic Tubes: The Influence of Exercise, Prostacyclin and Acetylsali-
cylic Acid. Thromb. Res. 1983, 29, 425–435. [CrossRef]
200. Fujita, M.; Nomura, K.; Hong, K.; Ito, Y.; Asada, A.; Nishimuro, S. Purification and Characterization of a Strong Fibrinolytic
Enzyme (Nattokinase) in the Vegetable Cheese Natto, a Popular Soybean Fermented Food in Japan. Biochem. Biophys. Res.
Commun. 1993, 197, 1340–1347. [CrossRef]
201. Hsu, R.-L.; Lee, K.-T.; Wang, J.-H.; Lee, L.Y.-L.; Chen, R.P.-Y. Amyloid-Degrading Ability of Nattokinase from Bacillus Subtilis
Natto. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 503–508. [CrossRef]
202. Oba, M.; Rongduo, W.; Saito, A.; Okabayashi, T.; Yokota, T.; Yasuoka, J.; Sato, Y.; Nishifuji, K.; Wake, H.; Nibu, Y.; et al. Natto
Extract, a Japanese Fermented Soybean Food, Directly Inhibits Viral Infections Including SARS-CoV-2 in Vitro. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 2021, 570, 21–25. [CrossRef]
203. Tanikawa, T.; Kiba, Y.; Yu, J.; Hsu, K.; Chen, S.; Ishii, A.; Yokogawa, T.; Suzuki, R.; Inoue, Y.; Kitamura, M. Degradative Effect of
Nattokinase on Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2. Molecules 2022, 27, 5405. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
204. Kurosawa, Y.; Nirengi, S.; Homma, T.; Esaki, K.; Ohta, M.; Clark, J.F.; Hamaoka, T. A Single-Dose of Oral Nattokinase Potentiates
Thrombolysis and Anti-Coagulation Profiles. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11601. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
205. Behera, P.; Patro, B.K.; Singh, A.K.; Chandanshive, P.D.; Ravikumar, S.R.; Pradhan, S.K.; Pentapati, S.S.K.; Batmanabane, G.;
Mohapatra, P.R.; Padhy, B.M.; et al. Role of Ivermectin in the Prevention of SARS-CoV-2 Infection among Healthcare Workers in
India: A Matched Case-Control Study. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0247163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
206. Zaidi, A.K.; Dehgani-Mobaraki, P. The Mechanisms of Action of Ivermectin against SARS-CoV-2—An Extensive Review. J.
Antibiot. 2022, 75, 60–71. [CrossRef]
207. Caly, L.; Druce, J.D.; Catton, M.G.; Jans, D.A.; Wagstaff, K.M. The FDA-Approved Drug Ivermectin Inhibits the Replication of
SARS-CoV-2 in Vitro. Antivir. Res. 2020, 178, 104787. [CrossRef]
208. Bryant, A.; Lawrie, T.A.; Dowswell, T.; Fordham, E.J.; Mitchell, S.; Hill, S.R.; Tham, T.C. Ivermectin for Prevention and Treatment
of COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Trial Sequential Analysis to Inform Clinical Guidelines. Am. J.
Ther. 2021, 28, e434–e460. [CrossRef]
209. Kory, P.; Meduri, G.U.; Varon, J.; Iglesias, J.; Marik, P.E. Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin
in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19. Am. J. Ther. 2021, 28, e299–e318. [CrossRef]
210. Griesel, M.; Wagner, C.; Mikolajewska, A.; Stegemann, M.; Fichtner, F.; Metzendorf, M.-I.; Nair, A.A.; Daniel, J.; Fischer, A.-L.;
Skoetz, N. Inhaled Corticosteroids for the Treatment of COVID-19. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022, 3, CD015125. [CrossRef]
211. van Paassen, J.; Vos, J.S.; Hoekstra, E.M.; Neumann, K.M.I.; Boot, P.C.; Arbous, S.M. Corticosteroid Use in COVID-19 Patients: A
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Clinical Outcomes. Crit. Care 2020, 24, 696. [CrossRef]
212. Goel, N.; Goyal, N.; Nagaraja, R.; Kumar, R. Systemic Corticosteroids for Management of ‘Long-COVID’: An Evaluation after 3
Months of Treatment. Monaldi Arch. Chest Dis. 2022, 92. [CrossRef]
213. Morán Blanco, J.I.; Alvarenga Bonilla, J.A.; Homma, S.; Suzuki, K.; Fremont-Smith, P.; Villar Gómez de las Heras, K. Antihistamines
and Azithromycin as a Treatment for COVID-19 on Primary Health Care—A Retrospective Observational Study in Elderly
Patients. Pulm. Pharmacol. Ther. 2021, 67, 101989. [CrossRef]
214. Pinto, M.D.; Lambert, N.; Downs, C.A.; Abrahim, H.; Hughes, T.D.; Rahmani, A.M.; Burton, C.W.; Chakraborty, R. Antihistamines
for Postacute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Nurse Pract. 2022, 18, 335–338. [CrossRef]
215. Reznikov, L.R.; Norris, M.H.; Vashisht, R.; Bluhm, A.P.; Li, D.; Liao, Y.-S.J.; Brown, A.; Butte, A.J.; Ostrov, D.A. Identification of
Antiviral Antihistamines for COVID-19 Repurposing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021, 538, 173–179. [CrossRef]
216. Tantry, U.S.; Bliden, K.P.; Gurbel, P.A. Further Evidence for the Use of Aspirin in COVID-19. Int. J. Cardiol. 2022, 346, 107–108.
[CrossRef]
217. Choubey, A.; Dehury, B.; Kumar, S.; Medhi, B.; Mondal, P. Naltrexone a Potential Therapeutic Candidate for COVID-19. J. Biomol.
Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 963–970. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
218. O’Kelly, B.; Vidal, L.; McHugh, T.; Woo, J.; Avramovic, G.; Lambert, J.S. Safety and Efficacy of Low Dose Naltrexone in a Long
Covid Cohort; an Interventional Pre-Post Study. Brain. Behav. Immun. Health 2022, 24, 100485. [CrossRef]
219. Karatza, E.; Ismailos, G.; Karalis, V. Colchicine for the Treatment of COVID-19 Patients: Efficacy, Safety, and Model Informed
Dosage Regimens. Xenobiotica 2021, 51, 643–656. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
220. Chiu, L.; Lo, C.-H.; Shen, M.; Chiu, N.; Aggarwal, R.; Lee, J.; Choi, Y.-G.; Lam, H.; Prsic, E.H.; Chow, R.; et al. Colchicine Use in
Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0261358. [CrossRef]
221. Rabbani, A.B.; Parikh, R.V.; Rafique, A.M. Colchicine for the Treatment of Myocardial Injury in Patients With Coronavirus Disease
2019 (COVID-19)—An Old Drug With New Life? JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e2013556. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
222. Fiolet, A.T.L.; Opstal, T.S.J.; Mosterd, A.; Eikelboom, J.W.; Jolly, S.S.; Keech, A.C.; Kelly, P.; Tong, D.C.; Layland, J.; Nidorf, S.M.;
et al. Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Colchicine in Patients with Coronary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of
Randomized Trials. Eur. Heart J. 2021, 42, 2765–2775. [CrossRef]
223. Ibrahim, S.; Lowe, J.R.; Bramante, C.T.; Shah, S.; Klatt, N.R.; Sherwood, N.; Aronne, L.; Puskarich, M.; Tamariz, L.; Palacio, A.;
et al. Metformin and Covid-19: Focused Review of Mechanisms and Current Literature Suggesting Benefit. Front. Endocrinol.
2021, 12, 587801. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
224. Bramante, C.T.; Buse, J.B.; Liebovitz, D.M.; Nicklas, J.L.; Puskarich, M.A.; Cohen, K.; Belani, H.; Anderson, B.; Huling, J.D.;
Tignanelli, C.J.; et al. Outpatient Treatment of COVID-19 with Metformin, Ivermectin, and Fluvoxamine and the Development of
Long Covid over 10-Month Follow-Up. medRxiv 2022. [CrossRef]
225. Barrea, L.; Verde, L.; Grant, W.B.; Frias-Toral, E.; Sarno, G.; Vetrani, C.; Ceriani, F.; Garcia-Velasquez, E.; Contreras-Briceño, J.;
Savastano, S.; et al. Vitamin D: A Role Also in Long COVID-19? Nutrients 2022, 14, 1625. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
226. Gönen, M.S.; Alaylıoğlu, M.; Durcan, E.; Özdemir, Y.; Şahin, S.; Konukoğlu, D.; Nohut, O.K.; Ürkmez, S.; Küçükece, B.; Balkan,
İ.İ.; et al. Rapid and Effective Vitamin D Supplementation May Present Better Clinical Outcomes in COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2)
Patients by Altering Serum INOS1, IL1B, IFNg, Cathelicidin-LL37, and ICAM1. Nutrients 2021, 13, 4047. [CrossRef]
227. Vollbracht, C.; Kraft, K. Feasibility of Vitamin C in the Treatment of Post Viral Fatigue with Focus on Long COVID, Based on a
Systematic Review of IV Vitamin C on Fatigue. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1154. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
228. Vollbracht, C.; Kraft, K. Oxidative Stress and Hyper-Inflammation as Major Drivers of Severe COVID-19 and Long COVID:
Implications for the Benefit of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C. Front. Pharm. 2022, 13, 899198. [CrossRef]
229. Tosato, M.; Calvani, R.; Picca, A.; Ciciarello, F.; Galluzzo, V.; Coelho-Júnior, H.J.; Di Giorgio, A.; Di Mario, C.; Gervasoni, J.;
Gremese, E.; et al. Effects of L-Arginine Plus Vitamin C Supplementation on Physical Performance, Endothelial Function, and
Persistent Fatigue in Adults with Long COVID: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 4984. [CrossRef]
230. Izzo, R.; Trimarco, V.; Mone, P.; Aloè, T.; Capra Marzani, M.; Diana, A.; Fazio, G.; Mallardo, M.; Maniscalco, M.; Marazzi, G.; et al.
Combining L-Arginine with Vitamin C Improves Long-COVID Symptoms: The LINCOLN Survey. Pharm. Res. 2022, 183, 106360.
[CrossRef]
231. Mangge, H.; Prueller, F.; Dawczynski, C.; Curcic, P.; Sloup, Z.; Holter, M.; Herrmann, M.; Meinitzer, A. Dramatic Decrease of
Vitamin K2 Subtype Menaquinone-7 in COVID-19 Patients. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1235. [CrossRef]
232. Debnath, U.; Dewaker, V.; Prabhakar, Y.S.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Mandal, A. Conformational Perturbation of SARS-CoV-2 Spike
Protein Using N-Acetyl Cysteine, a Molecular Scissor: A Probable Strategy to Combat COVID-19. ChemRxiv 2021. [CrossRef]
233. Shi, Z.; Puyo, C.A. N-Acetylcysteine to Combat COVID-19: An Evidence Review. Clin. Risk Manag. 2020, 16, 1047–1055. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
234. Wong, K.K.; Lee, S.W.H.; Kua, K.P. N-Acetylcysteine as Adjuvant Therapy for COVID-19—A Perspective on the Current State of
the Evidence. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021, 14, 2993–3013. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
235. Sengupta, P.; Dutta, S. N-Acetyl Cysteine as a Potential Regulator of SARS-CoV-2-Induced Male Reproductive Disruptions.
Middle East Fertil. Soc. J. 2022, 27, 14. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
236. Debnath, U.; Mitra, A.; Dewaker, V.; Prabhakar, Y.S.; Tadala, R.; Krishnan, K.; Wagh, P.; Velusamy, U.; Subramani, C.; Agarwal, S.;
et al. N-Acetyl Cysteine: A Tool to Perturb SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein Conformation. ChemRxiv 2021. [CrossRef]
237. Amin, A.N. The Role of Glutathione Deficiency and MSIDS Variables in Long COVID-19. 2022. Available online: https:
//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05371288 (accessed on 30 September 2022).
238. Guloyan, V.; Oganesian, B.; Baghdasaryan, N.; Yeh, C.; Singh, M.; Guilford, F.; Ting, Y.-S.; Venketaraman, V. Glutathione
Supplementation as an Adjunctive Therapy in COVID-19. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 914. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
239. Polonikov, A. Endogenous Deficiency of Glutathione as the Most Likely Cause of Serious Manifestations and Death in COVID-19
Patients. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020, 6, 1558–1562. [CrossRef]
240. Silvagno, F.; Vernone, A.; Pescarmona, G.P. The Role of Glutathione in Protecting against the Severe Inflammatory Response
Triggered by COVID-19. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 624. [CrossRef]
241. Cardinali, D.P.; Brown, G.M.; Pandi-Perumal, S.R. Possible Application of Melatonin in Long COVID. Biomolecules 2022, 12, 1646.
[CrossRef]
242. Lan, S.-H.; Lee, H.-Z.; Chao, C.-M.; Chang, S.-P.; Lu, L.-C.; Lai, C.-C. Efficacy of Melatonin in the Treatment of Patients with
COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J. Med. Virol. 2022, 94, 2102–2107.
[CrossRef]
243. Derosa, G.; Maffioli, P.; D’Angelo, A.; Di Pierro, F. A Role for Quercetin in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Phytother. Res.
2021, 35, 1230–1236. [CrossRef]
244. Tuli, H.; Sood, S.; Pundir, A.; Choudhary, D.; Dhama, K.; Kaur, G.; Seth, P.; Vashishth, A.; Kumar, P. Molecular Docking Studies of
Apigenin, Kaempferol, and Quercetin as Potential Target against Spike Receptor Protein of SARS COV. J. Exp. Biol. Agric. Sci.
2022, 10, 144–149. [CrossRef]
245. Önal, H.; Arslan, B.; Üçüncü Ergun, N.; Topuz, Ş.; Yilmaz Semerci, S.; Kurnaz, M.E.; Molu, Y.M.; Bozkurt, M.A.; Süner, N.; Kocataş,
A. Treatment of COVID-19 Patients with Quercetin: A Prospective, Single Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Turk. J. Biol.
2021, 45, 518–529. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
246. Pan, B.; Fang, S.; Zhang, J.; Pan, Y.; Liu, H.; Wang, Y.; Li, M.; Liu, L. Chinese Herbal Compounds against SARS-CoV-2: Puerarin
and Quercetin Impair the Binding of Viral S-Protein to ACE2 Receptor. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 3518–3527.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
247. Manjunath, S.H.; Thimmulappa, R.K. Antiviral, Immunomodulatory, and Anticoagulant Effects of Quercetin and Its Derivatives:
Potential Role in Prevention and Management of COVID-19. J. Pharm. Anal. 2022, 12, 29–34. [CrossRef]
248. Khan, A.; Iqtadar, S.; Mumtaz, S.U.; Heinrich, M.; Pascual-Figal, D.A.; Livingstone, S.; Abaidullah, S. Oral Co-Supplementation of
Curcumin, Quercetin, and Vitamin D3 as an Adjuvant Therapy for Mild to Moderate Symptoms of COVID-19—Results From a
Pilot Open-Label, Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Pharm. 2022, 13, 898062. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
249. Ho, T.-Y.; Wu, S.-L.; Chen, J.-C.; Li, C.-C.; Hsiang, C.-Y. Emodin Blocks the SARS Coronavirus Spike Protein and Angiotensin-
Converting Enzyme 2 Interaction. Antivir. Res. 2007, 74, 92–101. [CrossRef]
250. Maideen, N.M.P. Prophetic Medicine-Nigella Sativa (Black Cumin Seeds)—Potential Herb for COVID-19? J. Pharmacopunct. 2020,
23, 62–70. [CrossRef]
251. Rahman, M.T. Potential Benefits of Combination of Nigella Sativa and Zn Supplements to Treat COVID-19. J. Herb. Med. 2020, 23,
100382. [CrossRef]
252. Banerjee, A.; Kanwar, M.; Das Mohapatra, P.K.; Saso, L.; Nicoletti, M.; Maiti, S. Nigellidine (Nigella Sativa, Black-Cumin Seed)
Docking to SARS CoV-2 Nsp3 and Host Inflammatory Proteins May Inhibit Viral Replication/Transcription and FAS-TNF Death
Signal via TNFR 12 Blocking. Nat. Prod. Res. 2021, 36, 5817–5822. [CrossRef]
253. Giordo, R.; Zinellu, A.; Eid, A.H.; Pintus, G. Therapeutic Potential of Resveratrol in COVID-19-Associated Hemostatic Disorders.
Molecules 2021, 26, 856. [CrossRef]
254. Pasquereau, S.; Nehme, Z.; Haidar Ahmad, S.; Daouad, F.; Van Assche, J.; Wallet, C.; Schwartz, C.; Rohr, O.; Morot-Bizot, S.;
Herbein, G. Resveratrol Inhibits HcoV-229E and SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus Replication In Vitro. Viruses 2021, 13, 354. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
255. Ramdani, L.H.; Bachari, K. Potential Therapeutic Effects of Resveratrol against SARS-CoV-2. Acta Virol. 2020, 64, 276–280.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
256. McCreary, M.R.; Schnell, P.M.; Rhoda, D.A. Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Trial of Resveratrol
for Outpatient Treatment of Mild Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 10978. [CrossRef]
257. Zahedipour, F.; Hosseini, S.A.; Sathyapalan, T.; Majeed, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Al-Rasadi, K.; Banach, M.; Sahebkar, A. Potential
Effects of Curcumin in the Treatment of COVID-19 Infection. Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 2911–2920. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
258. Suravajhala, R.; Parashar, A.; Malik, B.; Nagaraj, A.V.; Padmanaban, G.; Kishor, P.K.; Polavarapu, R.; Suravajhala, P. Comparative
Docking Studies on Curcumin with COVID-19 Proteins. Preprints 2020, 2020050439. [CrossRef]
259. Jena, A.B.; Kanungo, N.; Nayak, V.; Chainy, G.B.N.; Dandapat, J. Catechin and Curcumin Interact with S Protein of SARS-CoV2
and ACE2 of Human Cell Membrane: Insights from Computational Studies. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 2043. [CrossRef]
260. Rattis, B.A.C.; Ramos, S.G.; Celes, M.R.N. Curcumin as a Potential Treatment for COVID-19. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 2085.
[CrossRef]
261. Vahedian-Azimi, A.; Abbasifard, M.; Rahimi-Bashar, F.; Guest, P.C.; Majeed, M.; Mohammadi, A.; Banach, M.; Jamialahmadi, T.;
Sahebkar, A. Effectiveness of Curcumin on Outcomes of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials.
Nutrients 2022, 14, 256. [CrossRef]
262. Abdelazeem, B.; Awad, A.K.; Elbadawy, M.A.; Manasrah, N.; Malik, B.; Yousaf, A.; Alqasem, S.; Banour, S.; Abdelmohsen, S.M.
The Effects of Curcumin as Dietary Supplement for Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Drug Discov. Ther. 2022, 16, 14–22. [CrossRef]
263. Iotti, S.; Wolf, F.; Mazur, A.; Maier, J.A. The COVID-19 Pandemic: Is There a Role for Magnesium? Hypotheses and Perspectives.
Magnes. Res. 2020, 33, 21–27. [CrossRef]
264. Tang, C.-F.; Ding, H.; Jiao, R.-Q.; Wu, X.-X.; Kong, L.-D. Possibility of Magnesium Supplementation for Supportive Treatment in
Patients with COVID-19. Eur. J. Pharm. 2020, 886, 173546. [CrossRef]
265. Guerrero-Romero, F.; Mercado, M.; Rodriguez-Moran, M.; Ramírez-Renteria, C.; Martínez-Aguilar, G.; Marrero-Rodríguez, D.;
Ferreira-Hermosillo, A.; Simental-Mendía, L.E.; Remba-Shapiro, I.; Gamboa-Gómez, C.I.; et al. Magnesium-to-Calcium Ratio and
Mortality from COVID-19. Nutrients 2022, 14, 1686. [CrossRef]
266. Tian, J.; Tang, L.; Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, J.; Huang, W.; Liu, M. Populations in Low-Magnesium Areas Were Associated with Higher
Risk of Infection in COVID-190 s Early Transmission: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study in the United States. Nutrients
2022, 14, 909. [CrossRef]
267. Tabatabaeizadeh, S.-A. Zinc Supplementation and COVID-19 Mortality: A Meta-Analysis. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2022, 27, 70. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
268. Pal, A.; Squitti, R.; Picozza, M.; Pawar, A.; Rongioletti, M.; Dutta, A.K.; Sahoo, S.; Goswami, K.; Sharma, P.; Prasad, R. Zinc and
COVID-19: Basis of Current Clinical Trials. Biol. Trace. Elem. Res. 2021, 199, 2882–2892. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
269. Prasad, A.S.; Malysa, A.; Bepler, G.; Fribley, A.; Bao, B. The Mechanisms of Zinc Action as a Potent Anti-Viral Agent: The Clinical
Therapeutic Implication in COVID-19. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1862. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
270. Pedrosa, L.F.C.; Barros, A.N.A.B.; Leite-Lais, L. Nutritional Risk of Vitamin D, Vitamin C, Zinc, and Selenium Deficiency on Risk
and Clinical Outcomes of COVID-19: A Narrative Review. Clin. Nutr. ESPEN 2022, 47, 9–27. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
271. Balboni, E.; Zagnoli, F.; Filippini, T.; Fairweather-Tait, S.J.; Vinceti, M. Zinc and Selenium Supplementation in COVID-19
Prevention and Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Experimental Studies. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2022, 71, 126956. [CrossRef]
272. Ma, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, R.; Luo, D.; Jiang, R.; Wu, H.; Zhuo, Z.; Yang, Q.; Li, J.; Leung, F.W.; et al. Associations of Habitual Fish
Oil Use with Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19-Related Outcomes in UK: National Population Based Cohort Study.
medRxiv 2022. [CrossRef]
273. Merritt, R.J.; Bhardwaj, V.; Jami, M.M. Fish Oil and COVID-19 Thromboses. J. Vasc. Surg. Venous Lymphat. Disord. 2020, 8, 1120.
[CrossRef]
274. Torrinhas, R.S.; Calder, P.C.; Lemos, G.O.; Waitzberg, D.L. Parenteral Fish Oil: An Adjuvant Pharmacotherapy for Coronavirus
Disease 2019? Nutrition 2021, 81, 110900. [CrossRef]
275. Theoharides, T.C.; Cholevas, C.; Polyzoidis, K.; Politis, A. Long-COVID Syndrome-associated Brain Fog and Chemofog: Luteolin
to the Rescue. Biofactors 2021, 47, 232–241. [CrossRef]
276. Shadrack, D.M.; Deogratias, G.; Kiruri, L.W.; Onoka, I.; Vianney, J.-M.; Swai, H.; Nyandoro, S.S. Luteolin: A Blocker of SARS-CoV-
2 Cell Entry Based on Relaxed Complex Scheme, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, and Metadynamics. J. Mol. Model 2021, 27, 221.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
277. Theoharides, T.C. COVID-19, Pulmonary Mast Cells, Cytokine Storms, and Beneficial Actions of Luteolin. Biofactors 2020, 46,
278. Di Stadio, A.; D’Ascanio, L.; Vaira, L.A.; Cantone, E.; De Luca, P.; Cingolani, C.; Motta, G.; De Riu, G.; Vitelli, F.; Spriano, G.; et al.
Ultramicronized Palmitoylethanolamide and Luteolin Supplement Combined with Olfactory Training to Treat Post-COVID-19
Olfactory Impairment: A Multi-Center Double-Blinded Randomized Placebo- Controlled Clinical Trial. Curr. Neuropharmacol.
2022, 20, 2001–2012. [CrossRef]
279. Masiello, P.; Novelli, M.; Beffy, P.; Menegazzi, M. Can Hypericum Perforatum (SJW) Prevent Cytokine Storm in COVID-19
Patients? Phytother. Res. 2020, 34, 1471–1473. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
280. Mohamed, F.F.; Anhlan, D.; Schöfbänker, M.; Schreiber, A.; Classen, N.; Hensel, A.; Hempel, G.; Scholz, W.; Kühn, J.; Hrincius,
E.R.; et al. Hypericum Perforatum and Its Ingredients Hypericin and Pseudohypericin Demonstrate an Antiviral Activity against
SARS-CoV-2. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 530. [CrossRef]
281. Verdoorn, B.P.; Evans, T.K.; Hanson, G.J.; Zhu, Y.; Langhi Prata, L.G.P.; Pignolo, R.J.; Atkinson, E.J.; Wissler-Gerdes, E.O.; Kuchel,
G.A.; Mannick, J.B.; et al. Fisetin for COVID-19 in Skilled Nursing Facilities: Senolytic Trials in the COVID Era. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc.
2021, 69, 3023–3033. [CrossRef]
282. Oladele, J.O.; Oyeleke, O.M.; Oladele, O.T.; Olowookere, B.D.; Oso, B.J.; Oladiji, A.T. Kolaviron (Kolaflavanone), Apigenin, Fisetin
as Potential Coronavirus Inhibitors: In Silico Investigatio. Res. Sq. 2020. [CrossRef]
283. Pandey, P.; Rane, J.S.; Chatterjee, A.; Kumar, A.; Khan, R.; Prakash, A.; Ray, S. Targeting SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein of COVID-19
with Naturally Occurring Phytochemicals: An in Silico Study for Drug Development. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2021, 39, 6306–6316.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
284. Willyard, C. How Anti-Ageing Drugs Could Boost COVID Vaccines in Older People. Nature 2020, 586, 352–354. [CrossRef]
[PubMed]
285. Dey, D.; Dey, N.; Ghosh, S.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A.; Thomas, J. Potential Combination Therapy Using Twenty
Phytochemicals from Twenty Plants to Prevent SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An in Silico Approach. Virusdisease 2021, 32, 108–116.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
286. Hawkins, J.; Hires, C.; Keenan, L.; Dunne, E. Aromatherapy Blend of Thyme, Orange, Clove Bud, and Frankincense Boosts
Energy Levels in Post-COVID-19 Female Patients: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial. Complement.
Ther. Med. 2022, 67, 102823. [CrossRef]
287. Fajri, M. The Potential of Moringa Oleifera as Immune Booster against COVID 19. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 807,
022008. [CrossRef]
288. Bachar, S.C.; Mazumder, K.; Bachar, R.; Aktar, A.; Al Mahtab, M. A Review of Medicinal Plants with Antiviral Activity Available
in Bangladesh and Mechanistic Insight Into Their Bioactive Metabolites on SARS-CoV-2, HIV and HBV. Front. Pharm. 2021, 12,
732891. [CrossRef]
289. Chaves, O.A.; Lima, C.R.; Fintelman-Rodrigues, N.; Sacramento, C.Q.; de Freitas, C.S.; Vazquez, L.; Temerozo, J.R.; Rocha, M.E.N.;
Dias, S.S.G.; Carels, N.; et al. Agathisflavone, a Natural Biflavonoid That Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication by Targeting Its
Proteases. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 222, 1015–1026. [CrossRef]
290. Janssens, J.; Laekeman, G.M.; Pieters, L.A.; Totte, J.; Herman, A.G.; Vlietinck, A.J. Nutmeg Oil: Identification and Quantitation of
Its Most Active Constituents as Inhibitors of Platelet Aggregation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 1990, 29, 179–188. [CrossRef]
291. Le-Trilling, V.T.K.; Mennerich, D.; Schuler, C.; Sakson, R.; Lill, J.K.; Kasarla, S.S.; Kopczynski, D.; Loroch, S.; Flores-Martinez, Y.;
Katschinski, B.; et al. Identification of Herbal Teas and Their Compounds Eliciting Antiviral Activity against SARS-CoV-2 in Vitro.
BMC Biol. 2022, 20, 264. [CrossRef]
292. Le-Trilling, V.T.K.; Mennerich, D.; Schuler, C.; Sakson, R.; Lill, J.K.; Kopczynski, D.; Loroch, S.; Flores-Martinez, Y.; Katschinski,
B.; Wohlgemuth, K.; et al. Universally Available Herbal Teas Based on Sage and Perilla Elicit Potent Antiviral Activity against
SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern by HMOX-1 Upregulation in Human Cells. bioRxiv 2022. [CrossRef]
293. Omoboyowa, D.A.; Balogun, T.A.; Chukwudozie, O.; Nweze, V.; Saibu, O.; Abdulahi, A. SARS-COV-2 Spike Glycoprotein as
Inhibitory Target for Insilico Screening of Natural Compound. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021, 11, 14974–14985.
294. Kumari, A.; Rajput, V.S.; Nagpal, P.; Kukrety, H.; Grover, S.; Grover, A. Dual Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Spike and Main Protease
through a Repurposed Drug, Rutin. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2022, 40, 4987–4999. [CrossRef]
295. Nagoor Meeran, M.F.; Seenipandi, A.; Javed, H.; Sharma, C.; Hashiesh, H.M.; Goyal, S.N.; Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S. Can Limonene Be a
Possible Candidate for Evaluation as an Agent or Adjuvant against Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation in COVID-19? Heliyon
2021, 7, e05703. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
296. Mohamed, M.E.; Tawfeek, N.; Elbaramawi, S.S.; Fikry, E. Agathis Robusta Bark Essential Oil Effectiveness against COVID-19:
Chemical Composition, In Silico and In Vitro Approaches. Plants 2022, 11, 663. [CrossRef]
297. Ziyaei, K.; Ataie, Z.; Mokhtari, M.; Adrah, K.; Daneshmehr, M.A. An Insight to the Therapeutic Potential of Algae-Derived
Sulfated Polysaccharides and Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids: Focusing on the COVID-19. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 209, 244–257.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
298. Sami, N.; Ahmad, R.; Fatma, T. Exploring Algae and Cyanobacteria as a Promising Natural Source of Antiviral Drug against
SARS-CoV-2. Biomed. J. 2021, 44, 54–62. [CrossRef]
299. Tzachor, A.; Rozen, O.; Khatib, S.; Jensen, S.; Avni, D. Photosynthetically Controlled Spirulina, but Not Solar Spirulina, Inhibits
TNF-α Secretion: Potential Implications for COVID-19-Related Cytokine Storm Therapy. Mar. Biotechnol. 2021, 23, 149–155.
[CrossRef]
300. Kumar, A.; Singh, R.P.; Kumar, I.; Yadav, P.; Singh, S.K.; Kaushalendra; Singh, P.K.; Gupta, R.K.; Singh, S.M.; Kesawat, M.S.; et al.
Algal Metabolites Can Be an Immune Booster against COVID-19 Pandemic. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 452. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
301. Tran, H.T.T.; Gigl, M.; Le, N.P.K.; Dawid, C.; Lamy, E. In Vitro Effect of Taraxacum Officinale Leaf Aqueous Extract on the
Interaction between ACE2 Cell Surface Receptor and SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein D614 and Four Mutants. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14,
1055. [CrossRef]
302. Vavilova, V.P.; Vavilov, A.M.; Tsarkova, S.A.; Nesterova, O.L.; Kulyabina, A.A.; Yakhno, N.B.; Anisimova, A.V.; Vavilov, V.A.;
Elkina, E.N.; Dobryak, T.A. One of the possibilities of optimizing the therapy of a new coronavirus infection in children with the
inclusion of an extract from marshmallow root, chamomile flowers, horsetail grass, walnut leaves, yarrow grass, oak bark and
dandelion grass: Prospective open comparative cohort study. Pediatr. Cons. Med. 2022, 4, 322–330. [CrossRef]
303. Lucas, K.; Ackermann, M.; Leifke, A.L.; Li, W.W.; Pöschl, U.; Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J. Ceylon Cinnamon and Its Major Compound
Cinnamaldehyde Can Limit Overshooting Inflammatory Signaling and Angiogenesis in Vitro: Implications for COVID-19
Treatment. bioRxiv 2021. [CrossRef]
304. Lucas, K.; Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.; Oppitz, N.; Ackermann, M. Cinnamon and Hop Extracts as Potential Immunomodulators for
Severe COVID-19 Cases. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 589783. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
305. Zareie, A.; Soleimani, D.; Askari, G.; Jamialahmadi, T.; Guest, P.C.; Bagherniya, M.; Sahebkar, A. Cinnamon: A Promising Natural
Product Against COVID-19. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2021, 1327, 191–195. [CrossRef]
306. Yakhchali, M.; Taghipour, Z.; Mirabzadeh Ardakani, M.; Alizadeh Vaghasloo, M.; Vazirian, M.; Sadrai, S. Cinnamon and Its
Possible Impact on COVID-19: The Viewpoint of Traditional and Conventional Medicine. Biomed. Pharm. 2021, 143, 112221.
[CrossRef]
307. Musazadeh, V.; Karimi, A.; Bagheri, N.; Jafarzadeh, J.; Sanaie, S.; Vajdi, M.; Karimi, M.; Niazkar, H.R. The Favorable Impacts of
Silibinin Polyphenols as Adjunctive Therapy in Reducing the Complications of COVID-19: A Review of Research Evidence and
Underlying Mechanisms. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 154, 113593. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
308. Speciale, A.; Muscarà, C.; Molonia, M.S.; Cimino, F.; Saija, A.; Giofrè, S.V. Silibinin as Potential Tool against SARS-Cov-2: In Silico
Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and Main Protease Molecular Docking Analysis, and in Vitro Endothelial Protective Effects.
Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 4616–4625. [CrossRef]
309. Intharuksa, A.; Arunotayanun, W.; Yooin, W.; Sirisa-ard, P. A Comprehensive Review of Andrographis Paniculata (Burm. F.)
Nees and Its Constituents as Potential Lead Compounds for COVID-19 Drug Discovery. Molecules 2022, 27, 4479. [CrossRef]
310. Sa-Ngiamsuntorn, K.; Suksatu, A.; Pewkliang, Y.; Thongsri, P.; Kanjanasirirat, P.; Manopwisedjaroen, S.; Charoensutthivarakul,
S.; Wongtrakoongate, P.; Pitiporn, S.; Chaopreecha, J.; et al. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Activity of Andrographis Paniculata Extract
and Its Major Component Andrographolide in Human Lung Epithelial Cells and Cytotoxicity Evaluation in Major Organ Cell
Representatives. J. Nat. Prod. 2021, 84, 1261–1270. [CrossRef]
311. Murugan, N.A.; Pandian, C.J.; Jeyakanthan, J. Computational Investigation on Andrographis Paniculata Phytochemicals to
Evaluate Their Potency against SARS-CoV-2 in Comparison to Known Antiviral Compounds in Drug Trials. J. Biomol. Struct.
Dyn. 2021, 39, 4415–4426. [CrossRef]
312. Tanwettiyanont, J.; Piriyachananusorn, N.; Sangsoi, L.; Boonsong, B.; Sunpapoa, C.; Tanamatayarat, P.; Na-Ek, N.; Kanchana-
surakit, S. Use of Andrographis Paniculata (Burm.f.) Wall. Ex Nees and Risk of Pneumonia in Hospitalised Patients with Mild
Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front. Med. 2022, 9, 947373. [CrossRef]
313. Ao, Z.; Chan, M.; Ouyang, M.J.; Olukitibi, T.A.; Mahmoudi, M.; Kobasa, D.; Yao, X. Identification and Evaluation of the Inhibitory
Effect of Prunella Vulgaris Extract on SARS-Coronavirus 2 Virus Entry. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0251649. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
314. Gomaa, A.A.; Abdel-Wadood, Y.A. The Potential of Glycyrrhizin and Licorice Extract in Combating COVID-19 and Associated
Conditions. Phytomed. Plus 2021, 1, 100043. [CrossRef]
315. van de Sand, L.; Bormann, M.; Alt, M.; Schipper, L.; Heilingloh, C.S.; Steinmann, E.; Todt, D.; Dittmer, U.; Elsner, C.; Witzke,
O.; et al. Glycyrrhizin Effectively Inhibits SARS-CoV-2 Replication by Inhibiting the Viral Main Protease. Viruses 2021, 13, 609.
[CrossRef] [PubMed]
316. Diomede, L.; Beeg, M.; Gamba, A.; Fumagalli, O.; Gobbi, M.; Salmona, M. Can Antiviral Activity of Licorice Help Fight COVID-19
Infection? Biomolecules 2021, 11, 855. [CrossRef]
317. Gomaa, A. Evaluation of The Potential Therapeutic Effects of Licorice and Boswellia Serrata Gum in Egyptian Patients With
COVID-19 as a Complementary Medicine. 2022. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04487964 (accessed
on 30 September 2022).
318. Ng, S.L.; Khaw, K.-Y.; Ong, Y.S.; Goh, H.P.; Kifli, N.; Teh, S.P.; Ming, L.C.; Kotra, V.; Goh, B.H. Licorice: A Potential Herb in
Overcoming SARS-CoV-2 Infections. J. Evid. Based. Integr. Med. 2021, 26, 2515690X21996662. [CrossRef]
319. Yi, Y.; Li, J.; Lai, X.; Zhang, M.; Kuang, Y.; Bao, Y.-O.; Yu, R.; Hong, W.; Muturi, E.; Xue, H.; et al. Natural Triterpenoids from
Licorice Potently Inhibit SARS-CoV-2 Infection. J. Adv. Res. 2021, 36, 201–210. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
320. Shakeeb, N.; Varkey, P.; Hynse, A.; Mandlecha, A. Anti-Inflammatory Response of Cardamom Extract and Prediction of
Therapeutic Window in COVID-19 Patients by Assessing Inflammatory Markers Using RT-PCR. Inflammopharmacology 2022, 30,
321. Vicidomini, C.; Roviello, V.; Roviello, G.N. Molecular Basis of the Therapeutical Potential of Clove (Syzygium Aromaticum L.) and
Clues to Its Anti-COVID-19 Utility. Molecules 2021, 26, 1880. [CrossRef]
322. Paidi, R.K.; Jana, M.; Raha, S.; McKay, M.; Sheinin, M.; Mishra, R.K.; Pahan, K. Eugenol, a Component of Holy Basil (Tulsi) and
Common Spice Clove, Inhibits the Interaction Between SARS-CoV-2 Spike S1 and ACE2 to Induce Therapeutic Responses. J.
Neuroimmune Pharm. 2021, 16, 743–755. [CrossRef]
323. Truzzi, F.; Whittaker, A.; D’Amen, E.; Tibaldi, C.; Abate, A.; Valerii, M.C.; Spisni, E.; Dinelli, G. Wheat Germ Spermidine and
Clove Eugenol in Combination Stimulate Autophagy In Vitro Showing Potential in Supporting the Immune System against Viral
Infections. Molecules 2022, 27, 3425. [CrossRef]
324. Gomaa, A.A.; Abdel-Wadood, Y.A.; Gomaa, M.A. Glycyrrhizin and Boswellic Acids, the Golden Nutraceuticals: Multitargeting
for Treatment of Mild–Moderate COVID-19 and Prevention of Post-COVID Cognitive Impairment. Inflammopharmacology 2022,
30, 1977–1992. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
325. Li, Y.; Yang, D.; Gao, X.; Ju, M.; Fang, H.; Yan, Z.; Qu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, L.; Weng, H.; et al. Ginger Supplement Significantly
Reduced Length of Hospital Stay in Individuals with COVID-19. Nutr. Metab. 2022, 19, 84. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
326. Khubber, S.; Hashemifesharaki, R.; Mohammadi, M.; Gharibzahedi, S.M.T. Garlic (Allium Sativum L.): A Potential Unique Therapeutic
Food Rich in Organosulfur and Flavonoid Compounds to Fight with COVID-19. Nutr. J. 2020, 19, 124. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
327. Donma, M.M.; Donma, O. The Effects of Allium Sativum on Immunity within the Scope of COVID-19 Infection. Med. Hypotheses
2020, 144, 109934. [CrossRef]
328. Thuy, B.T.P.; My, T.T.A.; Hai, N.T.T.; Hieu, L.T.; Hoa, T.T.; Thi Phuong Loan, H.; Triet, N.T.; Anh, T.T.V.; Quy, P.T.; Tat, P.V.; et al.
Investigation into SARS-CoV-2 Resistance of Compounds in Garlic Essential Oil. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 8312–8320. [CrossRef]
329. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Fu, P.; Zhou, H.; Guo, X.; Zhu, C.; Tu, Y.; Wang, J.; Li, H.; Chen, Z. Effect of Garlic Essential Oil in 97 Patients
Hospitalized with COVID-19: A Multi-Center Experience. Pak. J. Pharm. Sci. 2022, 35, 1077–1082.
330. Hammoudi Halat, D.; Krayem, M.; Khaled, S.; Younes, S. A Focused Insight into Thyme: Biological, Chemical, and Therapeutic
Properties of an Indigenous Mediterranean Herb. Nutrients 2022, 14, 2104. [CrossRef]
331. Kulkarni, S.A.; Nagarajan, S.K.; Ramesh, V.; Palaniyandi, V.; Selvam, S.P.; Madhavan, T. Computational Evaluation of Major
Components from Plant Essential Oils as Potent Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1221, 128823. [CrossRef]
332. Dilokthornsakul, W.; Kosiyaporn, R.; Wuttipongwaragon, R.; Dilokthornsakul, P. Potential Effects of Propolis and Honey in
COVID-19 Prevention and Treatment: A Systematic Review of in Silico and Clinical Studies. J. Integr. Med. 2022, 20, 114–125.
[CrossRef]
333. Berretta, A.A.; Silveira, M.A.D.; Cóndor Capcha, J.M.; De Jong, D. Propolis and Its Potential against SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Mechanisms and COVID-19 Disease: Running Title: Propolis against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and COVID-19. Biomed. Pharm. 2020,
131, 110622. [CrossRef]
334. Ali, A.M.; Kunugi, H. Propolis, Bee Honey, and Their Components Protect against Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): A
Review of In Silico, In Vitro, and Clinical Studies. Molecules 2021, 26, 1232. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
335. Ripari, N.; Sartori, A.A.; da Silva Honorio, M.; Conte, F.L.; Tasca, K.I.; Santiago, K.B.; Sforcin, J.M. Propolis Antiviral and
Immunomodulatory Activity: A Review and Perspectives for COVID-19 Treatment. J. Pharm. Pharm. 2021, 73, 281–299. [CrossRef]
336. Fiorini, A.C.; Scorza, C.A.; de Almeida, A.-C.G.; Fonseca, M.C.M.; Finsterer, J.; Fonseca, F.L.A.; Scorza, F.A. Antiviral Activity
of Brazilian Green Propolis Extract against SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome—Coronavirus 2) Infection: Case
Report and Review. Clin. Sao Paulo 2021, 76, e2357. [CrossRef]
337. Bachevski, D.; Damevska, K.; Simeonovski, V.; Dimova, M. Back to the Basics: Propolis and COVID-19. Derm. Ther. 2020, 33,
e13780. [CrossRef]
338. Bako, A.T.; Pan, A.; Potter, T.; Tannous, J.; Johnson, C.; Baig, E.; Meeks, J.; Woo, D.; Vahidy, F.S. Contemporary Trends in the
Nationwide Incidence of Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke 2022, 53, e70–e74. [CrossRef]
339. König, S.; Hohenstein, S.; Leiner, J.; Hindricks, G.; Meier-Hellmann, A.; Kuhlen, R.; Bollmann, A. National Mortality Data for
Germany before and throughout the Pandemic: There Is an Excess Mortality Exceeding COVID-19-Attributed Fatalities. J. Infect.
2022, 84, 834–872. [CrossRef]
340. Government of Canada, Statistics Canada. Provisional Deaths and Excess Mortality in Canada Dashboard. Available online:
https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2021028-eng.htm (accessed on 1 October 2022).
341. Aaby, P.; Jensen, H.; Gomes, J.; Fernandes, M.; Lisse, I.M. The Introduction of Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine and Child
Mortality in Rural Guinea-Bissau: An Observational Study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2004, 33, 374–380. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
342. Aldén, M.; Olofsson Falla, F.; Yang, D.; Barghouth, M.; Luan, C.; Rasmussen, M.; De Marinis, Y. Intracellular Reverse Transcription
of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44,
1115–1126. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual
author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to
people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Microorganisms 11 01308

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Microorganisms 11 01308

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Microorganisms 11 01308

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

microorganisms

1 EbMCsquared CIC, 11 Laura Place, Bath BA2 4BL, UK

Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11051308 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/microorganisms

3.2. Clinical Observations

• Underlying nutritional status and comorbidities: certain preexisting conditions may

4.1. Establishing a Healthy Microbiome

4.2. Preventing Spike Protein Damage

4.3. Inhibiting Spike Protein Binding

4.4. Clearing Spike Protein

4.5. Healing the Damage

4.6. Potential Therapeutics

Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Results

Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Evidence Summary

Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Evidence Summary

Compound Mechanism Reference Clinical Trials Evidence Summary

You might also like