Project Report
Project Report
Project Report
LIST OF CHART ii
LIST OF GRAPHS ii
ABSTRACT iii
PROFILE
CONCLUSION
BIBLIOGRAPHY 74
LIST OF TABLES
growth
fund growth
i
LIST OF CHART
LIST OF GRAPHS
ii
ABSTRACT
The mutual fund is structured around a fairly simple concept, the mitigation of
risk through the spreading of investments across multiple entities, which is achieved
by the pooling of a number of small investments into a large bucket. Yet, it has been
the subject of perhaps the most elaborate and prolonged regulatory effort in the
history of the country. The mutual fund industry has grown to gigantic proportions in
countries like the USA, in India it is still in the phase of infancy.
The origin of the Indian mutual fund industry can be traced back to 1964 when
the Indian Government, with a view to augment small savings within the country and
to channelize these savings to the capital markets, set up the Unit Trust of India
(UTI). The UTI was setup under a specific statute, the Unit Trust of India Act, 1963.
The Unit Trust of India launched its first open-ended equity scheme called Unit 64 in
the year 1964, which turned out to be one of the most popular mutual fund schemes in
the country. In 1987, the government permitted other public sector banks and
insurance companies to promote mutual fund schemes. Pursuant to this relaxation, six
public sector banks and two insurance companies’ viz. Life Insurance Corporation of
India and General Insurance Corporation of India launched mutual fund schemes in
the country.
Securities Exchange Board of India, better known as SEBI, formulated the
Mutual Fund (Regulation) 1993, which for the first time established a comprehensive
regulatory framework for the mutual fund industry. This proved to be a boon for the
mutual fund industry and since then several mutual funds have been set up by the
private sector as well as the joint sector. Kothari Pioneer Mutual fund became the first
from the private sector to establish a mutual fund in association with a foreign fund.
Since then several private sector companies have established their own funds in the
country, making mutual fund industry one of the most followed sector by critics and
investors alike. The share of private sector mutual funds too has gone up rapidly.
CHAPTER-I
INTRODUCTION
INTRODUCTION
1.1 DEFINITION OF MUTUAL FUNDS:
The mutual fund is structured around a fairly simple concept, the mitigation of
risk through the spreading of investments across multiple entities, which is
achieved by the pooling of a number of small investments into a large bucket.
Yet, it has been the subject of perhaps the most elaborate and prolonged
regulatory effort in the history of the country. The mutual fund industry has
grown to gigantic proportions in countries like the USA, in India it is still in
the phase of infancy.
The origin of the Indian mutual fund industry can be traced back to 1964 when
the Indian Government, with a view to augment small savings within the
country and to channelize these savings to the capital markets, set up the Unit
Trust of India (UTI). The UTI was setup under a specific statute, the Unit Trust
of India Act, 1963. The Unit Trust of India launched its first open-ended equity
scheme called Unit 64 in the year 1964, which turned out to be one of the most
popular mutual fund schemes in the country. In 1987, the government
permitted other public sector banks and insurance companies to promote
mutual fund schemes. Pursuant to this relaxation, six public sector banks and
two insurance companies’ viz. Life Insurance Corporation of India and General
Insurance Corporation of India launched mutual fund schemes in the country.
Secondary Data
The secondary data collected from the different sites, broachers, newspapers,
company offer documents, different books and through suggestions from the
project guide and from the faculty members of our college.
CHAPTER-II REVIEW OF
LITERATURE
2.1 MUTUAL FUND
Mutual fund is a trust that pools money from a group of investors (sharing
common financial goals) and invest the money thus collected into asset classes
that match the stated investment objectives of the scheme. Since the stated
investment objective of a mutual fund scheme generally forms the basis for an
investor's decision to contribute money to the pool, a mutual fund can not
deviate from its stated objectives at any point of time.
Every Mutual Fund is managed by a fund manager, who using his investment
management skills and necessary research works ensures much better return
than what an investor can manage on his own. The capital appreciation and
other incomes earned from these investments are passed on to the investors
(also known as unit holders) in proportion of the number of units they own
Open-end Funds
Funds that can sell and purchase units at any point in time are classified as
Open-end Funds. The fund size (corpus) of an open-end fund is variable (keeps
changing) because of continuous selling (to investors) and repurchases (from
the investors) by the fund. An open-end fund is not required to keep selling
new units to the investors at all times but is required to always repurchase,
when an investor wants to sell his units. The NAV of an open-end fund is
calculated every day.
Closed-end Funds
Funds that can sell a fixed number of units only during the New Fund Offer
(NFO) period are known as Closed-end Funds. The corpus of a Closed-end
Fund remains unchanged at all times. After the closure of the offer, buying and
redemption of units by the investors directly from the Funds is not allowed.
However, to protect the interests of the investors, SEBI provides investors with
two avenues to liquidate their positions:
1. Closed-end Funds are listed on the stock exchanges where investors can
buy/sell units from/to each other. The trading is generally done at a discount to
the NAV of the scheme. The NAV of a closed-end fund is computed on a
weekly basis (updated every Thursday)
2. Closed-end Funds may also offer "buy-back of units" to the unit
holders. In this case, the corpus of the Fund and its outstanding units do get
changed.
Load Funds/no-load funds Load Funds
Mutual Funds incur various expenses on marketing, distribution, advertising,
portfolio churning, fund manager’s salary etc. Many funds recover these
expenses from the investors in the form of load. These funds are known as
Load Funds. A load fund may impose following types of loads on the
investors:
• Entry Load – Also known as Front-end load, it refers to the load
charged to an investor at the time of his entry into a scheme. Entry load is
deducted from the investor’s contribution amount to the fund.
• Exit Load – Also known as Back-end load, these charges are imposed
on an investor when he redeems his units (exits from the scheme). Exit load is
deducted from the redemption proceeds to an outgoing investor.
• Deferred Load – Deferred load is charged to the scheme over a period
of time.
Contingent Deferred Sales Charge (CDSS) – In some schemes, the
percentage of exit load reduces as the investor stays longer with the fund. This
type of load is known as Contingent Deferred Sales Charge.
No-load Funds
All those funds that do not charge any of the above mentioned loads are known
as Noload Funds.
Non-Tax-exempt Funds
Funds that invest in taxable securities are known as Non-Tax-exempt Funds. In
India, all funds, except open-end equity oriented funds are liable to pay tax on
distribution income. Profits arising out of sale of units by an investor within 12
months of purchase are categorized as short-term capital gains, which are
taxable. Sale of units of an equity oriented fund is subject to Securities
Transaction Tax (STT). STT is deducted from the redemption proceeds to an
investor
CHART 2.2: BROAD MUTUAL FUND TYPES
Source:https://www.google.co.in/searchq=broad+mutual+fund+types&safe=active&source
1. Equity Funds
Equity funds are considered to be the more risky funds as compared to other
fund types, but they also provide higher returns than other funds. It is advisable
that an investor looking to invest in an equity fund should invest for long term
i.e. for 3 years or more. There are different types of equity funds each falling
into different risk ..
a. Aggressive Growth Funds - In Aggressive Growth Funds, fund managers
aspire for maximum capital appreciation and invest in less researched shares of
speculative nature. Because of these speculative investments Aggressive
Growth Funds become more volatile and thus, are prone to higher risk than
other equity funds.
b . Growth Funds - Growth Funds also invest for capital appreciation (with
time horizon of 3 to 5 years) but they are different from Aggressive Growth
Funds in the sense that they invest in companies that are expected to
outperform the market in the future. Without entirely adopting speculative
strategies, Growth Funds invest in those companies that are expected to post
above average earnings in the future.
c. Specialty Funds - Specialty Funds have stated criteria for investments and
their portfolio comprises of only those companies that meet their criteria.
Criteria for some specialty funds could be to invest/not to invest in particular
regions/companies. Specialty funds are concentrated and thus, are
comparatively riskier than diversified funds. There are following types of
specialty funds:
1. Sector Funds: Equity funds that invest in a particular sector/industry of
the market are known as Sector Funds. The exposure of these funds is limited
to a particular sector (say Information Technology, Auto, Banking,
Pharmaceuticals or Fast Moving Consumer Goods) which is why they are more
risky than equity funds that invest in multiple sectors.
2. Foreign Securities Funds: Foreign Securities Equity Funds have the
option to invest in one or more foreign companies. Foreign securities funds
achieve international diversification and hence they are less risky than sector
funds. However, foreign securities funds are exposed to foreign exchange rate
risk and country risk. 3. Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Funds: Funds that invest in
companies having lower market capitalization than large capitalization
companies are called Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Funds. Market capitalization of
Mid-Cap companies is less than that of big, blue chip companies (less than Rs.
2500 crores but more than Rs. 500 crores) and Small-Cap companies have
market capitalization of less than Rs. 500 crores. Market Capitalization of a
company can be calculated by multiplying the market price of the company's
share by the total number of its outstanding shares in the market. The shares of
Mid-Cap or Small-Cap Companies are not as liquid as of Large-Cap
Companies which gives rise to volatility in share prices of these companies and
consequently, investment gets risky.
4. Diversified Equity Funds - Except for a small portion of investment in
liquid money market, diversified equity funds invest mainly in equities without
any concentration on a particular sector(s). These funds are well diversified
and reduce sector-specific or company-specific risk. However, like all other
funds diversified equity funds too are exposed to equity market risk. One
prominent type of diversified equity fund in India is Equity Linked Savings
Schemes (ELSS). As per the mandate, a minimum of 90% of investments by
ELSS should be in equities at all times. ELSS investors are eligible to claim
deduction from taxable income (up to Rs 1 lakh) at the time of filing the
income tax return. ELSS usually has a lock-in period and in case of any
redemption by the investor before the expiry of the lock-in period makes him
liable to pay income tax on such income(s) for which he may have received
any tax exemption(s) in the past.
a. Equity Index Funds - Equity Index Funds have the objective to match the
performance of a specific stock market index. The portfolio of these funds
comprises of the same companies that form the index and is constituted in the
same proportion as the index. Equity index funds that follow broad indices
(like S&P CNX Nifty, Sensex) are less risky than equity index funds that
follow narrow sectoral indices (like BSEBANKEX or CNX Bank Index etc).
Narrow indices are less diversified and therefore, are more risky.
2. Debt/Income Funds
Funds that invest in medium to long-term debt instruments issued by private
companies, banks, financial institutions, governments and other entities
belonging to various sectors (like infrastructure companies etc.) are known as
Debt / Income Funds. Debt funds are low risk profile funds that seek to
generate fixed current income (and not capital appreciation) to investors. In
order to ensure regular income to investors, debt (or income) funds distribute
large fraction of their surplus to investors. Although debt securities are
generally less risky than equities, they are subject to credit risk (risk of default)
by the issuer at the time of interest or principal payment. To minimize the risk
of default, debt funds usually invest in securities from issuers who are rated by
credit rating agencies and are considered to be of "Investment Grade". Debt
funds that target high returns are more risky. Based on different investment
objectives, there can be following types of debt funds:
a. Diversified Debt Funds - Debt funds that invest in all securities issued
by entities belonging to all sectors of the market are known as diversified debt
funds. The best feature of diversified debt funds is that investments are
properly diversified into all sectors which results in risk reduction. Any loss
incurred, on account of default by a debt issuer, is shared by all investors
which further reduces risk for an individual investor.
b. Focused Debt Funds* - Unlike diversified debt funds, focused debt
funds are narrow focus funds that are confined to investments in selective debt
securities, issued by companies of a specific sector or industry or origin. Some
examples of focused debt funds are sector, specialized and offshore debt funds,
funds that invest only in Tax Free Infrastructure or Municipal Bonds. Because
of their narrow orientation, focused debt funds are more risky as compared to
diversified debt funds. Although not yet available in India, these funds are
conceivable and may be offered to investors very soon.
c. Assured Return Funds - Although it is not necessary that a fund will
meet its objectives or provide assured returns to investors, but there can be
funds that come with a lock-in period and offer assurance of annual returns to
investors during the lock-in period. Any shortfall in returns is suffered by the
sponsors or the Asset Management Companies (AMCs). These funds are
generally debt funds and provide investors with a low-risk investment
opportunity.
However, the security of investments depends upon the net worth of the
guarantor (whose name is specified in advance on the offer document). To
safeguard the interests of investors, SEBI permits only those funds to offer
assured return schemes whose sponsors have adequate net-worth to guarantee
returns in the future. In the past, UTI had offered assured return schemes (i.e.
Monthly Income Plans of UTI) that assured specified returns to investors in the
future. UTI was not able to fulfill its promises and faced large shortfalls in
returns. Eventually, government had to intervene and took over UTI's payment
obligations on itself. Currently, no AMC in India offers assured return schemes
to investors, though possible.
d. Fixed Term Plan Series - Fixed Term Plan Series usually are closed-
end schemes having short term maturity period (of less than one year) that
offer a series of plans and issue units to investors at regular intervals. Unlike
closed-end funds, fixed term plans are not listed on the exchanges. Fixed term
plan series usually invest in debt / income schemes and target short-term
investors. The objective of fixed term plan schemes is to gratify investors by
generating some expected returns in a short period.
e. Gilt funds : Also known as Government Securities in India, Gilt Funds
invest in government papers (named dated securities) having medium to long
term maturity period. Issued by the Government of India, these investments
have little credit risk (risk of default) and provide safety of principal to the
investors. However, like all debt funds, gilt funds too are exposed to interest
rate risk. Interest rates and prices of debt securities are inversely related and
any change in the interest rates results in a change in the NAV of debt/gilt
funds in an opposite direction.
4. Money Market/Liquid Funds
Money market / liquid funds invest in short-term (maturing within one year)
interest bearing debt instruments. These securities are highly liquid and provide
safety of investment, thus making money market / liquid funds the safest
investment option when compared with other mutual fund types. However,
even money market / liquid funds are exposed to the interest rate risk. The
typical investment options for liquid funds include Treasury Bills (issued by
governments), Commercial papers (issued by companies) and Certificates of
Deposit (issued by banks).
5. Hybrid Funds
As the name suggests, hybrid funds are those funds whose portfolio includes a
blend of equities, debts and money market securities. Hybrid funds have an
equal proportion of debt and equity in their portfolio. There are following types
of hybrid funds in India:
a. Balanced Funds – The portfolio of balanced funds include assets like
debt securities, convertible securities, and equity and preference shares held in
a relatively equal proportion. The objectives of balanced funds are to reward
investors with a regular income, moderate capital appreciation and at the same
time minimizing the risk of capital erosion. Balanced funds are appropriate for
conservative investors having a long term investment horizon
b. Growth-and-Income Funds – Funds that combine features of growth
funds and income funds are known as Growth-and-Income Funds. These funds
invest in companies having potential for capital appreciation and those known
for issuing high dividends. The level of risks involved in these funds is lower
than growth funds and higher than income funds.
6. Commodity Funds
Those funds that focus on investing in different commodities (like metals, food
grains, crude oil etc.) or commodity companies or commodity futures contracts
are termed as Commodity Funds. A commodity fund that invests in a single
commodity or a group of commodities is a specialized commodity fund and a
commodity fund that invests in all available commodities is a diversified
commodity fund and bears less risk than a specialized commodity fund.
“Precious Metals Fund” and Gold Funds (that invest in gold, gold futures or
shares of gold mines) are common examples of commodity funds.
7. Real Estate Funds
Funds that invest directly in real estate or lend to real estate developers or
invest in shares/securitized assets of housing finance companies, are known as
Specialized Real Estate Funds. The objective of these funds may be to generate
regular income for investors or capital appreciation.
8. Exchange Traded Funds (ETF)
Exchange Traded Funds provide investors with combined benefits of a closed-
end and an open-end mutual fund. Exchange Traded Funds follow stock
market indices and are traded on stock exchanges like a single stock at index
linked prices. The biggest advantage offered by these funds is that they offer
diversification, flexibility of holding a single share (tradable at index linked
prices) at the same time. Recently introduced in India, these funds are quite
popular abroad.
9. Fund of Funds
Mutual funds that do not invest in financial or physical assets, but do invest in
other mutual fund schemes offered by different AMCs, are known as Fund of
Funds. Fund of Funds maintain a portfolio comprising of units of other mutual
fund schemes, just like conventional mutual funds maintain a portfolio
comprising of equity/debt/money market instruments or non-financial assets.
Fund of Funds provide investors with an added advantage of diversifying into
different mutual fund schemes with even a small amount of investment, which
further helps in diversification of risks. However, the expenses of Fund of
Funds are quite high on account of compounding expenses of investments into
different mutual fund schemes.
Thus, different mutual fund schemes are exposed to different levels of risk and
investors should know the level of risks associated with these schemes before
investing. The graphical representation hereunder provides a clearer picture of
the relationship between mutual funds and levels of risk associated with these
funds:
Managed by a Board of
Trustees
Source:https://www.google.co.in/searchsafe=active&mutual+funds+structure&oq=mutual+funds+
structure
The Total Risk of a given fund is sum of these and is measured in terms of
standard deviation of returns of the fund. Systematic risk. On the other hand is
measured in terms of Beta, which represents t1uctuations in the NAV of the
fund vis-à-vis market. The more responsive the NA V of a mutual fund is to
the changes in the market; higher will be its beta. Beta is calculated by relating
the returns on a mutual fund with the returns in the market. While unsystematic
risk can be diversified through investments in a number of instruments,
systematic risk cannot.
By using the risk return relationship, we try to assess the competitive strength
of the mutual funds vis-à-vis one another in a better way:
In order to determine the risk-adjusted returns of investment portfolios, several
eminent authors have worked since 2060s to develop composite performance
indices to evaluate a portfolio by comparing alternative portfolios within a
particular risk class.
The most important and widely used measures of performance are:
• The Treynor Measure
• The Sharpe Measure
• Jenson Model
• Fama Model
Fama Model
The Eugene Fama model is an extension of Jenson model. This model
compares the performance, measured in terms of returns, of a fund with the
required return commensurate with the total risk associated with it. The
difference between these two is taken as a measure of the performance of the
fund and is called net selectivity. The net selectivity represents the stock
selection skill of the fund manager, as it is the excess return over and above the
return required to compensate for the total risk taken by the fund manager.
Higher value of which indicates that fund manager has earned returns well
above the return commensurate with the level of risk taken by him.
Required return can be calculated as:
Ri= Rf+ Si/Sm*(Rm– Rf)
Where, Smis standard deviation of market returns.
The net selectivity is then calculated by subtracting this required return from
the actual return of the fund. Among the above performance measures, two
models namely, Treynor measure and Jenson model use systematic risk based
on the premise that the unsystematic risk is diversifiable. These models are
suitable for large investors like institutional investors with high risk taking
capacities as they do not face paucity of funds and can invest in a number of
options to dilute some risks. For them, a portfolio can be spread across a
number of stocks and sectors. However, Sharpe measure and Fama model that
consider the entire risk associated with fund are suitable for small investors, as
the ordinary investor lacks the necessary skill and resources to diversified.
Moreover, the selection of the fund on the basis of superior stock selection
ability of the fund manager will also help in safeguarding the money invested
to a great extent. The investment in funds that have generated big returns at
higher levels of risks leaves the money all the more prone to risks of all kinds
that may exceed the individual investors’ risk appetite.
Sector mutual funds
Sector mutual funds are those mutual funds that restrict their investments to a
particular segment or sector of the economy. Also known as thematic funds,
these funds concentrate on one industry such as infrastructure, banking,
technology, energy, real estate, power heath care, FMCG, pharmaceuticals etc.
The idea is to allow investors to place bets on specific industries or sectors,
which have strong growth potential.
These funds tend to be more volatile than funds holding a diversified portfolio
of securities in many industries. Such concentrated portfolios can produce
tremendous gains or losses, depending on whether the chosen sector is in or out
of favour. Sectoral mutual funds come in the high risk high reward category
and are not suitable for investors having low risk appetite.
Generally, mutual fund houses avoid launching sectoral funds as they are
seasonal in nature and do well only in cycles. Since these funds focus on just
one sector of the economy, they limit diversification and the fund manager’s
ability to capitalize on other sectors, if the specific sectors aren’t doing well.
Unless a particular sector is doing very well and its long term growth prospects
look bright, it advisable not to trade in sector funds.
Value funds are those mutual funds that tend to focus on safety rather than
growth, and often choose investments providing dividends as well as capital
appreciation. They invest in companies that the market has overlooked, and
stocks that have fallen out of favour with mainstream investors, either due to
changing investor preferences a poor quarterly earnings report,or hard times in
a particular industry.
Investing in value fund involves identifying fundamentally sound stocks that
are trading at a discount to their fair value. The fund manager buys these stocks
and holds them until the stock bounce backs to its fair value. The fund
managers identify undervalued stocks in the market on the basis of
fundamental analysis techniques. In this process stocks with low price to
earnings ratios are tagged. These stocks are then closely reviewed to see which
ones have the greatest growth potential and are paying high dividends.
ARTICLES ARTICLE 1
TITLE : A Rational Theory of Mutual Funds' Attention Allocation
AUTHOR : Kacperczyk, Laura Veldkamp Stijn,& Van Nieuwerburgh
JOURNAL : Journal of the Econometric Theory
YEAR : 2016
ABSTRACT : The question of whether and how mutual fund managers
provide valuable services for their clients motivates one of the largest
literatures in finance. One candidate explanation is that funds process
information about future asset values and use that information to invest in high
valued assets. But formal theories are scarce because information choice
models with many assets are difficult to solve as well as difficult to test. This
paper tackles both problems by developing a new attention allocation model
that uses the state of the business cycle to predict information choices, which in
turn, predict observable patterns of portfolio investments and returns. The
predictions about fund portfolios' covariance with payoff shocks, cross fund
portfolio and return dispersion, and their excess returns are all supported by the
data. These findings offer new evidence that some investment managers have
skill and that attention is allocated rationally.
ARTICLE 2
TITLE : Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
AUTHOR : Arno Rifdl& Paul Smeet
JOURNAL : Journal of Finance
YEAR :2018
ARTICLE 3
TITLE : Determinants of Investment Behavior Of Investors Towards Mutual
Funds
AUTHOR : Inderjit Kaur
JOURNAL : Journal of Indian Business Research
YEAR : 2018
ARTICLE 4
TITLE : Runs On Money Market Mutual Funds
AUTHOUR : Lawrence Schmidt,Allan Timmermann& Russ werners
JOURNAL : American Economic Review
YEAR :2016
ABSTRACT :We study daily money market mutual fund flows at the
individual share class level during September 2008. This fine granularity of
data allows new insights into investor and portfolio holding characteristics
conducive to run risk in cash-like asset pools. We find that cross-sectional flow
data observed during the week of the Lehman failure are consistent with key
implications of a simple model of coordination with incomplete information
and strategic complementarities. Similar conclusions follow from daily models
fitted to capture dynamic interactions between investors with differing levels of
sophistication within the same money fund, holding constant the underlying
portfolio.
ARTICLE 5
TITLE : Window Dressing in Mutual Funds
AUTHOUR : Vikas Agarwal Gerald D. Gay Leng Ling
JOURNAL : The Review of Financial Studies
YEAR : 2014
ABSTRACT: We provide a rationale for window dressing wherein investors
respond to conflicting signals of managerial ability inferred from a fund's
performance and disclosed portfolio holdings. We contend that window
dressers make a risky bet on their performance during a reporting delay period,
which affects investors' interpretation of the conflicting signals and hence their
capital allocations. Conditional on good (bad) performance, window dressers
benefit (suffer) from higher (lower) investor flows compared with non–window
dressers. Window dressers also show poor past performance, possess little
skill, and incur high portfolio turnover and trade costs, characteristics which in
turn result in worse future performance.
CHAPTER-III
INDUSTRY
PROFILE
INDUSTRY PROFILE
Introduction
India’s banking sector is constantly growing. Since the turn of the century,
there has been a noticeable upsurge in transactions through ATMs, and also
internet and mobile banking.
Following the passing of the Banking Laws (Amendment) Bill by the Indian
Parliament in 2018, the landscape of the banking industry began to change.
The bill allows the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to make final guidelines on
issuing new licenses, which could lead to a bigger number of banks in the
country. Some banks have already received licences from the government, and
the RBI's new norms will provide incentives to banks to spot bad loans and
take requisite action to keep rogue borrowers in check.
Over the next decade, the banking sector is projected to create up to two
million new jobs, driven by the efforts of the RBI and the Government of India
to integrate financial services into rural areas. Also, the traditional way of
operations will slowly give way to modern technology.
Market size
Total banking assets in India touched US$ 1.8 trillion in FY19and are
anticipated to cross US$ 28.5 trillion in FY25.
Bank deposits have grown at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 21.2
per cent over FY06–18. Total deposits in FY19were US$ 1,274.3 billion.
Total banking sector credit is anticipated to grow at a CAGR of 20.1 per cent
(in terms of INR) to reach US$ 2.4 trillion by 2020.
In FY17, private sector lenders witnessed discernable growth in credit cards
and personal loan businesses. HDFC Bank witnessed 171.6 per cent growth in
personal loan disbursement in FY17, as per a report by Emkay Global
Financial Services. Axis Bank's personal loan business also rose 49.8 per cent
and its credit card business expanded by 31.1 per cent.
Investments
Bengaluru-based software services exporter Emphasis Ltd has bagged a five-
year contract from Punjab National Bank (PNB) to set up the bank’s contact
centers in Mangalore and Noida (UP). Emphasis will provide support for all
banking products and services, including deposits operations, lending services,
banking processes, internet banking, and account and card-related services.
The company will also offer services in multiple languages.
Microfinance companies have committed to setting up at least 30 million bank
accounts within a year through tie-ups with banks, as part of the Indian
government’s financial inclusion plan. The commitment was made at a meeting
of representatives of 25 large microfinance companies and banks and
government representatives, which included financial services secretary Mr GS
Sandhu.
Export-Import Bank of India (Exim Bank) will increase its focus on supporting
project exports from India to South Asia, Africa and Latin America, as per Mr
Yaduvendra Mathur, Chairman and MD, Exim Bank. The bank has moved up
the value chain by supporting project exports so that India earns foreign
exchange. In 2018–18, Exim Bank lent support to 85 project export contracts
worth Rs 24,255 crore (US$ 3.96 billion) secured by 47 companies in 23
countries.
Government Initiatives
The RBI has given banks greater flexibility to refinance current long-gestation
project loans worth Rs 1,000 crore (US$ 173.42 million) and more, and has
allowed partial buyout of such loans by other financial institutions as standard
practice. The earlier stipulation was that buyers should purchase at least 50 per
cent of the loan from the existing banks. Now, they get as low as 25 per cent of
the loan value and the loan will still be treated as ‘standard’.
The RBI has also relaxed norms for mortgage guarantee companies (MGC)
enabling these firms to use contingency reserves to cover for the losses
suffered by the mortgage guarantee holders, without the approval of the apex
bank. However, such a measure can only be initiated if there is no single option
left to recoup the losses. SBI is planning to launch a contact-less or tap-and-go
card facility to make payments in India. Contact-less payment is a technology
that has been adopted in several countries, including Australia, Canada and the
UK, where customers can simply tap or wave their card over a reader at a
point-of-sale terminal, which reads the card and allows transactions.
SBI and its five associate banks also plan to empower account holders at the
bottom of the social pyramid with a customer call facility. The proposed
facility will help customers get an update on available balance, last five
transactions and cheque book request on their mobile phones.
Road Ahead
India is yet to tap into the potential of mobile banking and digital financial
services. Forty-seven per cent of the populace have bank accounts, of which
half lie dormant due to reliance on cash transactions, as per a report. Still, the
industry holds a lot of promise.
India's banking sector could become the fifth largest banking sector in the
world by 2020 and the third largest by 2025. These days, Indian banks are
turning their focus to servicing clients and enhancing their technology
infrastructure, which can help improve customer experience as well as give
banks a competitive edge. Exchange Rate Used: INR 1 = US$ 0.0173 as on
October 28, 2020
The level of government regulation of the banking industry varies widely, with
countries such as Iceland, having relatively light regulation of the banking
sector, and countries such as China having a wide variety of regulations but no
systematic process that can be followed typical of a communist system.
CHAPTER-IV
DATA ANALYSIS
Table 4.1: For analysis Net Asset Value (NAV) of the Four AMC’S for the
period of 1st December 2019 to 22nd January 2020
Date Market SBI LIC HDFC
Level Magnum Nomura Blue Chip HDFC
( NIFTY) Balanced Balanced - FundGrowth Income
Fund- Growth FundGrowth
Growth
Source:https://www.google.com/search?q=Net+Asset+Value+(NAV)
+of+the+Four+Asset+manageme nt+companies&oq=Net+Asset+Value+(NAV)
+of+the+Four+Asset+management+companies&aqs=chr
ome..69i57.18257j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Table 4.2 : Calculations of Risk of SBI Magnum Balanced Fund- Growth
For the period of 1stDecember 2019to 22nd January 2020
SBI Magnum
Balanced
Fund-
Market Level
Growth Returns
Date ( NIFTY) Returns
22/01/2020 7376.65 92.37
21/01/2020 7357.00 -20.65 91.38 -0.99
20/01/2020 7381.8 24.8 91.24 -0.14
20/01/2020 7420.35 38.55 92.12 0.88
18/01/2020 7561.65 141.3 91.30 -0.82
17/01/2020 7467.4 -94.25 92.89 1.59
14/01/2020 7557.9 90.5 94.20 1.31
13/01/2020 7587.2 29.3 94.63 0.43
12/01/2020 7527.45 -59.75 94.93 0.3
11/01/2020 7611.65 84.2 95.46 0.53
08/01/2020 7673.35 61.7 95.87 0.41
07/01/2020 7788.05 114.7 95.25 -0.62
06/01/2020 7828.4 40.35 96.38 1.13
05/01/2020 7924.55 96.17 96.29 -0.09
04/01/2020 7938.45 13.9 96.34 0.05
01/01/2020 7897.8 -40.65 97.43 1.09
31/12/2019 7938.6 40.8 96.99 -0.44
30/12/2019 7929.2 -9.4 96.61 -0.38
29/12/2019 7863.2 -66 96.76 0.17
28/12/2019 7888.75 25.55 96.67 -0.09
23/12/2019 7830.45 -58.3 96.27 -0.4
22/12/2019 7829.4 -1.05 96.13 -0.14
21/12/2019 7745.65 -83.75 95.44 -0.69
18/12/2019 7828.9 83.25 95.55 0.11
17/12/2019 7783.05 -45.85 95.37 -0.18
18/12/2019 7725.25 -57.8 95.68 0.31
17/12/2019 7659.17 -66.1 94.91 -0.77
14/12/2019 7558.2 -100.95 94.55 -0.36
11/12/2019 7699.6 141.4 94.08 -0.47
10/12/2019 7643.3 -56.3 93.99 -0.09
09/12/2019 7695.5 52.2 94.32 0.33
08/12/2019 7738.5 43 93.94 -0.38
07/12/2019 7818.55 78.05 94.82 0.88
04/12/2019 7817.6 1.05 95.28 0.46
03/12/2019 7902.3 84.7 95.46 0.18
02/12/2019 7976.7 74.4 95.74 0.28
01/12/2019 7958.17 -18.55 96.06 0.32
Average 17.74 0.173
Source : https://www.google.com/search?q=SBI+Magnum+Balanced+Fund-
+Growth&oq=SBI+Magnum+Balanced+Fund-
+Growth&aqs=chrome..69i57j0l5.2107j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Beta 0.57
Chart 4.1: Graphical Presentation of SBI Magnum Balanced Fund-Growth
For the month of January 2020
Interpretation:
SBI Magnum Balanced Fund-Growth has been analyzed and it is found that
there is a positive growth. However on the basis of the avg returns of SBI there
is a growth 0.17 as against the index avg of 14.74 the beta being less than 1 the
stock is not highly volatile.
Table 4.3 : Calculations of Risk of LIC Nomura Balanced -Growth For the
period of 1st December 2019to 22nd January 2020
Market Level LIC Nomura
Balanced -
Date ( NIFTY) Returns Growth Returns
22/01/2020 7376.65 73.93
21/01/2020 7357.00 -20.65 73.04 -0.89
20/01/2020 7381.8 24.8 73.07 0.03
20/01/2020 7420.35 38.55 74.02 0.95
18/01/2020 7561.65 141.3 73.33 -0.69
17/01/2020 7467.4 -94.25 74.55 1.22
14/01/2020 7557.9 90.5 76.08 1.53
13/01/2020 7587.2 29.3 76.46 0.38
12/01/2020 7527.45 -59.75 76.91 0.45
11/01/2020 7611.65 84.2 77.47 0.56
08/01/2020 7673.35 61.7 77.98 0.51
07/01/2020 7788.05 114.7 77.48 -0.5
06/01/2020 7828.4 40.35 79.26 1.78
05/01/2020 7924.55 96.17 79.50 0.24
04/01/2020 7938.45 13.9 79.34 -0.18
01/01/2020 7897.8 -40.65 80.44 1.1
31/12/2019 7938.6 40.8 79.96 -0.48
30/12/2019 7929.2 -9.4 79.80 -0.18
29/12/2019 7863.2 -66 79.98 0.18
28/12/2019 7888.75 25.55 79.97 -0.01
23/12/2019 7830.45 -58.3 79.65 -0.32
22/12/2019 7829.4 -1.05 79.55 -0.1
21/12/2019 7745.65 -83.75 79.17 -0.4
18/12/2019 7828.9 83.25 79.33 0.18
17/12/2019 7783.05 -45.85 78.79 -0.54
18/12/2019 7725.25 -57.8 79.17 0.36
17/12/2019 7659.17 -66.1 78.47 -0.68
14/12/2019 7558.2 -100.95 78.28 -0.20
11/12/2019 7699.6 141.4 78.08 -0.2
10/12/2019 7643.3 -56.3 78.04 -0.04
09/12/2019 7695.5 52.2 78.68 0.64
08/12/2019 7738.5 43 78.34 -0.34
07/12/2019 7818.55 78.05 79.28 0.94
04/12/2019 7817.6 1.05 79.88 0.6
03/12/2019 7902.3 84.7 79.90 0.02
02/12/2019 7976.7 74.4 80.53 0.63
01/12/2019 7958.17 -18.55 81.00 0.47
Average 18.17 0.20
Source:https://www.google.com/search?
safe=active&ei=5OWIXIu0MpSavQSG9L_IAw&q=Risk+of+ LIC+Nomura+Balanced+-
Growth&oq=Risk+of+LIC+Nomura+Balanced+-Growth&gs
Beta 0.42
Chart 4.2: Graphical Presentation of LIC Nomura Balanced -Growth For the
month of January 19
Interpretation:
LIC Nomura Balanced –Growth have been analyzed and it is found that there is
a negative growth. However on the basis of the avg returns of LIC Nomura
Balanced – Growth there is a negative growth 0.14as against the index avg of
negative 0.20 the beta being less than 1 the stock is not highly volatile.
Table 4.4 : Calculations of Risk of HDFC limited Blue-chip fund-Growth for
the period of 1st December 2019to 22nd January 2020
Date Market Level HDFC
( NIFTY) Return Limited Return
blue chip
fund-Growth
22/01/2020 7376.65 13.58
21/01/2020 7357.00 -20.65 13.31 -0.27
20/01/2020 7381.8 24.8 13.39 0.08
20/01/2020 7420.35 38.55 13.67 0.28
18/01/2020 7561.65 141.3 13.50 -0.17
17/01/2020 7467.4 -94.25 13.78 0.28
14/01/2020 7557.9 90.5 13.95 0.17
13/01/2020 7587.2 29.3 14.05 0.1
12/01/2020 7527.45 -59.75 14.01 -0.04
11/01/2020 7611.65 84.2 14.12 0.11
08/01/2020 7673.35 61.7 14.17 0.05
07/01/2020 7788.05 114.7 14.09 -0.08
06/01/2020 7828.4 40.35 14.44 0.35
05/01/2020 7924.55 96.17 14.48 0.04
04/01/2020 7938.45 13.9 14.43 -0.05
01/01/2020 7897.8 -40.65 14.71 0.28
31/12/2019 7938.6 40.8 14.67 -0.04
30/12/2019 7929.2 -9.4 14.60 -0.07
29/12/2019 7863.2 -66 14.66 0.06
28/12/2019 7888.75 25.55 14.63 -0.03
23/12/2019 7830.45 -58.3 14.53 -0.1
22/12/2019 7829.4 -1.05 14.53 0
21/12/2019 7745.65 -83.75 14.41 -0.12
18/12/2019 7828.9 83.25 14.48 0.07
17/12/2019 7783.05 -45.85 14.38 -0.1
18/12/2019 7725.25 -57.8 14.52 0.14
17/12/2019 7659.17 -66.1 14.29 -0.23
14/12/2019 7558.2 -100.95 14.22 -0.07
11/12/2019 7699.6 141.4 14.11 -0.11
10/12/2019 7643.3 -56.3 14.04 -0.07
09/12/2019 7695.5 52.2 14.18 0.12
08/12/2019 7738.5 43 14.00 -0.18
07/12/2019 7818.55 78.05 14.22 0.22
04/12/2019 7817.6 1.05 14.34 0.12
03/12/2019 7902.3 84.7 14.34 0
02/12/2019 7976.7 74.4 14.45 0.11
01/12/2019 7958.17 -18.55 14.56 0.11
Average 18.17 0.02
Source:https://www.google.com/search?
safe=active&ei=yeaIXIqZF5Ky9QPqwbgAg&q=Risk+of+India+Infoline+Finance+limited+Bluech
ip+fundGrowth&oq=Risk+of+India+Infoline+Finance+limited+Bluechip+fund-Growth
Beta 0.12
Graph 4.3: Graphical Presentation of HDFC limited Blue chip fund Growth
For the month of January 19
Interpretation:
HDFC Limited blue chip fund-Growth have been analyzed and it is found that
there is a positive growth. However on the basis of the avarage returns of HDFC
Limited blue chip fund-Growth there is a negative growth 0.02 as against the
index avarage of negative 0.02 the beta being less than 0.12 the stock is not
highly volatile.
Interpretation:
HDFC Limited Income fund-growth has been analyzed and it is found that there is
a negative growth. However on the basis of the average returns of HDFC Limited
Income fund-growth there is a negative growth 0.02 as against the index avarage
of negative 0.02 the beta being less than 0.08 the stock is not highly volatile.
-2.7 -0.67
SOURCE:https://www.google.co.in/search?
ei=AuiIXOChKsGamgfz6Kz4Aw&q=Comparative+Study
+of+the+performance+of+the++SBI+MAGNUM+FUND+AND+LIC+NOMURA+AMC
%E2%80%9
9s+Sharp+index++and++Treynor+index&oq=Comparative+Study+of+the+performance+of+the+
+SBI +MAGNUM+FUND+AND+LIC+NOMURA+AMC%E2%80%99s+Sharp+index++and+
+Treynor+in dex&gs
0.00
Sharpe's Index
-0.05
-0.10
-0.15
-0.20
-0.25
-0.30
Interpretation:
• From the above table and graph we can know that LIC Nomura
Balanced – Growth and SBI Magnum Balanced Fund- Growth are
giving good returns and they are in first position,
• And the second position is SBI
Graph 4.6:The graphical representation of TREYNER Index
Trenyor's Ratio
0.00
-0.10
-0.20
-0.30
-0.40
-0.50
-0.60
-0.70
-0.80
Name of the Fund
Interpretation:
• From the above table and graph we can know LIC Nomura
Balanced -
Growth is performing well and it is in first position
• And the second position is SBI Magnum Balanced Fund-
Growth I
• The general trend in the reduction of the market price for
various mutual funds studied is not encouraging the stock
market index has also been falling continuously because of
general economic slowdown however the funds are ranked
considering sharp and trenyors in the order of performances
CHAPTER-V FINDINGS,
SUGGESTIONS & CONCLUSION
5.1 FINDINGS OF THE STUDY
JOURNAL
1. Glushkov, D. and Statman, M., 2015. Classifying and Measuring the
Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds.
2. Bogle, J.C., 2015. Bogle on mutual funds: New perspectives for the
intelligent investor. John Wiley & Sons.
3. Frankel, T. and Laby, A.B., 2015. The regulation of money managers:
mutual fundsand advisers (Vol. 3). Wolters Kluwer Law & Business
WEB SITE
1. https://mf.indiainfoline.com/MFOnline/Home
2. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/mutual-funds
3. https://www.nseindia.com/products/content/equities/
mutual_funds/mfss.htm 4.
https://www.moneycontrol.com/mutualfundindia
NEWSPAPER
1 .Dharmendra Kumar 2020“Should a new investor invest in direct plans of mutual
funds?” on ECONOMIC TIMES, July 17
2.Jash Kriplani 2020“Mutual funds disclousers from rating agencies to improve
predictability” BUSINESS STANDARD ,November 15