Horus-The Deified Ham: Part 1: Gavin Cox
Horus-The Deified Ham: Part 1: Gavin Cox
Horus-The Deified Ham: Part 1: Gavin Cox
One of the most famous and ancient of Egypt’s many deities was Horus, the falcon sun-god. In two articles I explore 12
key motifs of the life of Ham (Noah’s third son) drawn from the Genesis text. I then compare them to Horus drawn from
Egyptian evidence, concentrating on the oldest evidence first. Part 1 looks at the following motifs: 1) Ham is 11th from
Adam; 2) etymology of Ham’s name; 3) Ham came from a family of eight; and 4) Ham, the youngest of three brothers.
These comparisons support the thesis that Ham was deified by the pagan Egyptians as Horus.
Biblical historical foundations who was considered a creator god, as well as a form of
the sun. His father was Osiris/Geb, with a notable brother,
44
VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021
Ham’s genealogy places him 11th from Adam, who all lived to great
1 11th from Adam 5:1–32
ages
4 3 brothers, total Ham (youngest), Shem, Japheth (eldest) 5:32; 6:10; 7:13 etc.
5 Father Noah Noah (name means ‘comfort/rest’ from cursed earth) 5:29–32; 6:8–10 etc.
6 Ark (300x50x30 cubits; 3 decks) Noah (and family) entered Ark (Tëbat)/rested 17th of month 6:15–16; 7:11; 8:16–18
10 Journeyed from East to Shinar After Babel YHWH scattered humankind, (including Ham and sons) 11:2, 8–9
12 Lived to great age Ham likely lived to similar age as brother Shem 11:11
Ennead—taking into account Osiris as bystander—from the considered consecutive offspring of Atum.4 However, what of
Egyptian Atum. This may represent a paganized memory of the Greater Ennead’s ages? Is there a comparison here with
the genealogies of Genesis 5:1–32 where Ham (and broth- the lifespans of the Genesis 5:1–32 patriarchs?
ers) stand 11th in-line from Adam. Although the Ennead was The 19th Dynasty Turin Canon papyrus (figure 3), though
considered a unified group (typically of nine), evidence highly damaged, provides information regarding Egypt’s ear-
suggests (e.g. PT-600§1655), that they were simultaneously liest history, which designates Egypt’s Predynastic rulers as
šms.w-ḥr.w “Followers of Horus” (Wb 4, 486.16–19). Horus
appears along with Seth and Thoth within columns 1 and 2
(fragments 11, 150) amongst the ‘gods and demi-gods’ with
extraordinary reign lengths.5 Interestingly, the first names
in the list contain likely references to creation, as well as
Horus, Seth, and Thoth5 (known from the Greater Ennead).
Egyptologist K. Ryholt explains:
“The mythological kings consists [sic.] of gods,
demigods, and spirits. … The first name [n ib […]]
could be brought into relation with the primaeval ocean,
the time before land existed and water was everywhere.
The name ‘clod of the shore’ [pns.t n spt] can hardly
be other than a reference to the creation of life out of
lifeless matter, earth. The two latter names [‘possessor
of noble women’ (ẖrḥm.wt-šps.w[t]) and ‘protector of
Figure 1. Siltstone Narmer Palette (recto), CG14716 Narmer and Horus [noble?] women’ (ḫw-ḥm.wt-[šps.wt?])] could, perhaps,
vanquishing foes
relate to the creation of women. Further below, in the
45
JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021 || VIEWPOINT
Image: Codex / CC BY-SA 3.0
Figure 2. Horus statue in black granite, Temple of Horus, Edfu Figure 3. 19th Dynasty Turin King List, in hieratic script
now lost part of column 2, there was a further transition Eusebius (relying on the extended LXX chronology)
from demigods to spirits, which continues in the first makes the unlikely claim the Egyptian chronology should be
nine lines of column 3. The spirits have generally been reckoned as months. Waddell in a footnote states:
interpreted as prehistoric kings, but it remains unclear “(Fn. 1) The Pre-dynastic Period begins with a group
how much historical importance should be attached to of gods, consisting of the Great Ennead of Heliopolis in
the information the king-list has to offer.”6 the form in which it was worshipped at Memphis … .
This sounds like a paganized reference to creation, In the Turin Papyrus the Gods are given in the same
Adam (from the earth), and Eve, up to later stages in the order: (Ptah), Rê, (Shu), Geb, Osiris, Sêth (200 years),
chronogenealogy, listed in Genesis 5:1–32. The nine lost lines Horus (300 years), Thoth (3126 years), MaꜤ at, Har … .”6
may have included the number of mythical rulers described. “(Fn. 5) ‘Demigods’ should be in apposition to ‘Spir-
That this papyrus seems to parallel Genesis from creation its of the Dead’… . These are perhaps the Shemsu Hor,
to the Flood was not lost on Eusebius, Bishop of Caesarea the Followers or Worshippers of Horus, of the Turin
(ad 260/265–339/340), Roman historian, and exegete, who Papyrus … .”7
claimed access to material by Manetho (via the pseudepi- Although Eusebius overstates the case, we perhaps have
graphical Book of Sothis). In W.G. Waddell’s 1964 translation in the remains of the Turin Canon and the Greater Ennead
of the Armenian version of Eusebius, he purportedly states: the Egyptian version of the Genesis’ chronogenealogies from
“From the Egyptian History of Manetho, who com- Adam to Noah’s family, preserved, though in pagan form,
posed his account in three books. These deal with the from the original memory of Ham, deified here as Horus.
Gods, the Demigods, the Spirits of the Dead, and the
mortal kings who ruled Egypt … [Eusebius lists these
gods with Greek names, genealogically] … reckoned to Motif 2. Horus cf. Ham—name etymology:
have comprised in all 24,900 lunar years, which make violence, blackness, heat
2206 solar years. Now, if you care to compare these
figures with Hebrew chronology, you will find that they
Etymology of Ham’s name
are in perfect harmony. Egypt is called Mestraim by the
Hebrews; and Mestraim lived not long after the Flood. As discussed in previous articles,8 Ham’s name can be
For after the Flood, Cham (or Ham), son of Noah, begat understood via phonetic connections to similar-sounding words
Aegyptus or Mestraim, who was the first to set out to within the Hebrew text, biblical scholars call this ‘paronoma-
establish himself in Egypt, at the time when the tribes sia’, (play-on-words, puns). At Genesis 6:11 the reason for the
began to disperse this way and that. Now the whole Flood is given—the earth is full of ḥāmas “violence, wrong”
time from Adam to the Flood was, according to the (HALOT-2980). A phonetic correspondence with ‘Ham’ is
Hebrews, 2242 years … .” 6 apparent in v. 11 (note orange-highlighted text):
46
VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021
Table 2. ‘Ham’ phonetically equivalent words, meanings, and earliest occurrences (phonetic roots highlighted orange)
Translit. (k spelling)
ֶת־ח֥ם ְואֶת־ ָיֽפֶת׃ָ ֶת־ׁשם א ֖ ֵ ְֹלׁשה ָב ִנ֑ים א ֣ ָ ַוּיֹ֥ולֶד ֖נ ֹ ַח ׁש6:10 Two more phonetic connections to ‘Ham’ can be discerned
ֱֹלהים וַּתִ ּמָלֵ ֥א ה ָ ָ֖א ֶרץ חָמָ ֽס׃
֑ ִ וַּתִ ּשׁ ֵָח֥ת ה ָ ָ֖א ֶרץ ִלפ ְֵנ֣י הָ ֽא6:11 after the Flood:
“And Noah begat three sons, Shem, Ham (ḥām), and 1. YHWH makes a covenant with Noah and his family,
Japheth. Now the earth was corrupt in God’s sight, and promising dependable seasons (Genesis 8:22) cold and
the earth was filled with violence (ḥāmās)” (Genesis “heat” (ḥōm).
6:10–11). ֖ע ֹד ּכָל־י ֵ ְ֣מי ה ָ ָ֑א ֶרץ ֶ֡ז ַרע ְ֠ו ָקצִיר ו ְ֙ק ֹר ו ָ֜ח ֹם ו ַ ְ֧קי ִץ ו ָ֛ח ֹ ֶרף ְויֹ֥ום ו ַ ָ֖ליְלָה8:22
ֹל֥ א יִׁשְּבֹֽתּו׃
Theologian Moshe Garsiel states of the pun that it:
“While the earth remains, seedtime and harvest, cold
“… does not serve here merely as sound play but
and heat (ḥōm), summer and winter, day and night,
implies a connection between Ham and ‘lawlessness’. shall not cease.”
Later on (9:22–27), this son indeed displays the inferi-
ority of his nature compared to his brothers.”9 2. Ham’s grandson Nimrod (Genesis 10:8 ̶ 10) at the con-
The word ḥāmās occurs three times in Genesis (6:11, struction of the tower of Babel provoked the next judgment
13; 49:5). The meaning of this word becomes apparent at of humankind. Cassuto noticed a play-on-words in Gen-
Genesis 49:5, within Jacob’s curse and blessings of his esis 11:3,10 specifically in its construction materials:
sons. The verse in question states: “Simeon and Levi are …וה ֵח ָ֔מר ָה ָי ֥ה ל ֶ ָ֖הם ל ַֽח ֹמֶר׃
֣ ַ 11:3
brothers—their swords are weapons of ḥāmās.” The context ...wühaºHëmäºr häyâ lähem laHöºmer.
demands ‘violence’, not merely moral wrongdoing. It is this “… and the bitumen hath been to them for mortar”
specific aspect of ḥāmās that lead to the Flood judgment. (Genesis 11:3, YLT).
47
JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021 || VIEWPOINT
The Babel rebellion was actualized through building, significance of the root kk will be discussed in motif-3. This
including with Hëmäºr for Höºmer, bitumen for mortar—spe- is found in OK PT:
cifically—black/dark coloured earthen materials. This word,
Hëmäºr, occurs three more times in the Old Testament. Next Teti PT-292§433a.
is Genesis 14:10, where the kings of Sodom and Gomorrah ntk tkk.n tk.j jkn-hj
fell into ‘tar pits’, and lastly in Exodus 2:3, where in Egypt, “You’re one the attacker attacked, jkn-hj-Snake!”
the infant Moses’ basket was waterproofed with ‘tar’. Next, The one attacking is explained and the epithet applied to
Höºmer occurs in Exodus 1:14, when Israel laboured with Horus in a Middle Kingdom Coffin Text (MK CT): CT-885.
‘mortar’ for the Egyptians.
These similar ‘vocables’ (Hämas, Höm, Hëmäºr, Höºmer) jntk tkk ntk ḥr.w nn.w sp-2 ḏ.t r p.t
phonetically connect to Ham. A theoretical semantic range “You are the attacker, you, Horus! Sink down wea-
for Ham’s name can be established when comparing similar- rily, Cobra, from heaven!”
sounding Hebrew words in the early chapters of Genesis.11
Table 2 lists these earliest occurrences of phonetically con- The Egyptian Book of the Dead (BOD) glorifies the vio-
necting Hebrew words and their meaning, thereby offering lence of Horus, for example chapter 19 (22nd Dynasty) states:
vocabulary and semantic range by which the name ‘Ham’ “Osiris N. has repeated praise 4 times, for all his
can be understood. enemies are fallen, overthrown and slain. Horus the
From the evidence presented in table 2, Hebrew words son of Isis and the son of Osiris has repeated millions
found in Genesis (and the ancient book of Job) encapsulate of jubilees, for all his enemies are fallen, overthrown
three key concepts connecting phonetically to Ham’s name: and slain. They have been carried off to the place of
1) (physical) ‘violence’; 2) (earthen) ‘blackness/darkness’; execution, the slaughtering-block of the easterners.
and 3) (sun’s) ‘heat’, whereby etymologically, Ham’s name They have been decapitated, they have been strangled,
is understood. Are these three concepts integral to Horus? their arm(s) have been cut off, their heart(s) have been
The following evidence (A–C) suggests this is so. removed. They have been given (to the Great) Anni-
hilator in the valley; they shall never escape … .”15
Phonetic considerations for Ham’s name in relation to Egyptologists A.M. Blackman and H.W. Fairman rec-
Hebrew and Egyptian ognize Horus as the god of war, who may have had a kernel
of historical reality as a founder of Egypt:
Hebrew ḥām, is pronounced with an initial voiceless pha-
“Junker has expressed the opinion, not without
ryngeal fricative <ḥ>, middle aleph <a> vowel, and terminal,
reason, that the god of Edfu, Horus of Behdet, was
nasal bilabial <m>.11 Furthermore, <ḥ> is grouped with the
in his original form a warrior-god as well as a divine
guttural fricatives: <ḫ>, <ẖ>.12 Phonetically similar ‘voiceless
king, the stories of whose exploits rest ultimately on
stops’ /k/ and /kh/ (excluding ḳ) coexisted in Egyptian, and
an historical basis. That basis, if we accept the theory
survived into Coptic—for instance KYME and <YMi represent
propounded by Sethe in his Urgeschichte [prehistory],
two forms of km.t (‘Egypt’) (see section B).13
is to be found in the wars waged in pre-dynastic times
Through evidence of Semitic loan words into Egyptian14
by the Horus-kings of Heliopolis, whose frontier town
Hebrew ḥeth (x))) is consistently transcribed into Egyptian as
was Edfu, against the Seth-kings of Ombos and south-
/ḥ/. Hebrew kaph K is transcribed into Egyptian as /k/ or /g/,
ern Egypt.”16
never /ḥ/. Words containing the biliteral symbol km 𓆎 (as in
km.t) provide no examples of Semitic exchange. Therefore,
B) Ham cf. Horus: (Earthy) blackness/darkness
from established phonetic evidence it cannot be proven that
Hebrew Ḥam and Egyptian km are related names, despite An important word for ‘black’ in Egyptian is km (Wb 5,
their superficial phonetic similarities. However, two examples 124.10–12), and Egypt’s name km.t means “the black land”
of Hebrew words, meaning ‘black’ (Job 3:5, hapax legome- which refers to the black fertile Nile-flood soils (see part 2).
non) and ‘hot’ (Genesis 43:30, three occurrences) are spelled From the discussion above, Egyptian ‘km’ and Hebrew ‘Ḥam’
with Hebrew <k>, offering a possible phonetic relationship, share semantic concepts of ‘earthy blackness/darkness’. Here
which requires further research. we have an immediately apparent link with the black earthi-
ness inherent in Ham and Egypt’s names.
A) Violent Horus—the attacker-spirit (kk)
The following textual evidence associates Horus with Horus the ‘very black’
struggle, violence, and war. For instance, the divine epi- Egyptologist T.G. Allen stated that “Horus is black and
thet tkk, means “attacker, to attack” (Wb 5, 336.2–11). The great (or ‘very black’) in his name of km-wr.”17 For instance:
48
VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021
49
JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021 || VIEWPOINT
50
VIEWPOINT || JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021
51
JOURNAL OF CREATION 35(2) 2021 || VIEWPOINT
is included from evidence in PTs regarding the Great Ennead. 23. Faulkner, R.O., The Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts, vol. I, Spells 1–354, Aris &
Phillips, Warminster, p. 234, 1973; also CT-205:145; 249:343; 316:98.
Motif 2. The etymology of Ham’s name includes concepts 24. Shonkwiler, R.L., The Behdetite: A study of Horus the Behdetite from the Old
of (physical) “violence”, (earthy) “blackness/darkness”, and Kingdom to the conquest of Alexander, Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, IL,
p. 413, 2014.
(sun’s) “heat”. These concepts compare favourably with
25. Cox, G., The search for Noah and the Flood in ancient Egypt: parts 1–2,
divine epithets of Horus. Motif 3. Ham came from a fam- J. Creation 33(3):94–108, 2019.
ily of 8—four males and their wives. The case is made here 26. Budge, E.A.W., Facsimiles of the papyri of Hunefer, Ankhai, Kērasher and
that Horus ascended from the Ogdoad, who are four males Netchemet, Longmans and Co., Oxford, p. 4, 1899.
and their wives. Specifically, Horus is connected to Ogdoad 27. Budge, ref. 25, p. v, plate 8.
member kk (darkness) in which case kk follows the natural 28. Fakhry, A., The Egyptian deserts—Bahria Oasis, Cairo Gov. Press, Bulâq, p. 75,
1942.
ascension of darkness to light, to transform into Horus as the 29. Fakhry, ref. 27, p. 77; example from temple of Kharga.
sun. Motif 4. Ham was the youngest of three brothers, Shem, 30. Klozt, D., Adoration of the Ram: Five hymns to Amun-Re from Hibis Temple,
and Japheth. The case can be made that Horus is the “child” Yale Egyptological Seminar, New Haven, CT, p. 10, 2006.
who has a notable brother, Seth, and closely aligned to Thoth, 31. Faulkner, ref. 22, p. 47.
another brother-(like) god. The connections are intriguing 32. Cox, ref. 24, p. 99.
and so merit further study. Part 2 will analyze motifs 5–12. 33. Čermák, M., Thoth in the Pyramid Texts, Ph.D. thesis, Univerzita Karlova v
Praze, Filozofická fakulta, Ústav filosofie a religionistiky, pp. 22, 62, 2015.
34. Faulkner, R.O., The Ancient Egyptian Coffin Texts, vol. II, Warminster, Aris and
Phillips, 1977.
Acknowledgements 35. Čermák, ref 32, p. 75.
I would like to thank Gary Bates and several anonymous 36. Quirk, S., Going out in Daylight—prt m hrw, Golden House Publications,
Croydon, UK, p. 515, 2013.
reviewers for their critical remarks on earlier manuscripts.
References
1. See introduction in: Pinch, G., Handbook of Egyptian Mythology, ABC-Clio,
CA, pp. 143–147, 2002.
2. creation.com/timeline.
3. Cox, G., In search of Adam, Eve and creation in Ancient Egypt, J. Creation
34(4):61–69, 2021.
4. Klotz, D., Adoration of the Ram: Five hymns to Amun-Re from Hibis Temple,
Yale Egyptological Seminar, CT, p. 118, 2006.
5. Ryholt, K., The Turin King List, Ägypten und Levante 14:135–155, 2004; p. 139.
6. Waddell, W.G., Manetho, Harvard University Press, London, p. 3, 1964.
7. Waddell, ref. 6, p. 5.
8. Cox, G., The search for Noah and the Flood in ancient Egypt—part 3, J. Creation
34(2)67–74, 2020.
9. Garsiel, M., Biblical Names: A literary study of midrashic derivations and puns,
Graph Press, Jerusalem, p. 86, 1991.
10. Cassuto, U., A commentary on the book of Genesis II, Verda Books, IL, p. 234,
2005. Gavin M. Cox has two masters degrees, one in biblical
11. Cox, ref. 7, p. 71. studies from Exeter University, the other in Egyptology from
12. Loprieno, A., Ancient Egyptian: A linguistic introduction, Cambridge University Birmingham University, an honours degree in theology from
Press, Cambridge, p. 35, 1995.
London Bible College, and a Higher National Diploma of
13. Loprieno, ref. 11, p. 42.
minerals engineering from Camborne School of Mines. He
14. Hoch, J.E., Semitic Words in Egyptian Texts of the New Kingdom and Third
Intermediate Period, Princeton University Press, NJ, pp. 230, 456 ̶ 520, 1994. now works full time for Creation Ministries International
15. Allen, T.G., The Egyptian Book of the Dead, University of Chicago Press, IL, (UK/Europe) as a speaker/writer since June of 2018. Prior
p. 35, 1960. to this, his work included 10 years in the seismic industry as
16. Blackman, A.M. and Fairman, H.W., The Myth of Horus at Edfu- II, J. Egyptian a geophysicist and topographic land surveyor both on land
Archaeology, 28:32–38, 1942; p. 32.
and marine in Africa, the Middle East, Europe, and the UK.
17. Allen, T.G., Horus in the Pyramid Texts, Ph.D. dissertation, University of
Chicago, Chicago, p. 27, 1916.
52