841 March 2022
841 March 2022
841 March 2022
Rakhmanbergenova Yekaterina
Pavlodar Pedagogical University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan
katerakhman@gmail.com
Kulakhmetova Mergul
Pavlodar Pedagogical University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan
1. INTRODUCTION
In the past few years, there have been a lot of discussions about the need to teach writing at
secondary school, along with other types of speech activities. It is obvious that written speech
ceases to play only an auxiliary role in teaching a foreign language. In the new standard of
secondary (complete) general education in a foreign language, along with the ability to fill out
a form, a questionnaire, sign a postcard, write a letter, summarize the content of what has been
read, students are required to be able to “write about facts and events of their lives, expressing
their opinion, judgments and feelings; write with minimal support about real and imaginary
past events, activities and experiences on a growing range of familiar general topics and some
curricular topics (SPE, 2017). Thus, the teacher must prepare students to create written
messages with a very different functional and communicative orientation, content,
compositional structure and linguistic form.
The researchers note that in spite of the difficulties of writing, it is of utmost importance that
learners achieve competence in this area. “Writing provides the ability to articulate ideas, argue
opinions, and synthesize multiple perspectives, it is essential to communicating persuasively
with others, including teachers, peers, colleagues, coworkers, and the community.”
(Crowhurst, 1990).
Competent writing is an indicator of the high level of development, mindset, outlook and
quality education. Creative writing skills can be attributed to skills that will be helpful lifelong.
Nowadays when recruiting, the employers give preference to those candidates who are able to
express their thoughts competently in an essay, reason logically, offer original solutions to
problems. Language choices regarding syntax and word selection serve to reflect sophistication
of linguistic skills, the writer’s competence, and even socioeconomic status (McNamara,
Crossley, & McCarthy, 2011, p. 63).
Nevertheless, it has to be noted that in the existing teaching materials, this aspect of learning a
foreign language is not paid enough attention to; often in addition to the topic the textbook
offers a sample of an essay in the end of the unit.
Pamela Rausch emphasizes that the two productive language domains -speaking and
writing- should be taught in interaction, without separating them, as it happens traditionally.
The researcher also insists that systematic instruction is essential: “…purposeful instruction of
speaking appears to be transferable, also benefiting English learners’ writing skills. However,
while students are able to transfer skills relating to critical analysis and organization, they will
need additional instruction on skills, such as spelling and other conventions, which are
exclusive to writing.” (Rausch, 2015)
Taking into account the finding, described above and also students’ age, level of language
proficiency, learning style the teacher has to look for ways to solve the problem independently,
seek for answers to questions, first of all - how to organize the educational process where each
student is an active participant and does not just put letters into words, words into sentences,
does not just write a plain answer to the topic set, but tries to find appropriate means of
expressing their own thoughts and ideas.
The school learning process changed in accordance with the demands of the society, as
well as its goals and objectives (Saeed et al., 2021). In particular, the practical goal of teaching
was transformed from teaching a foreign language as a formal school subject to teaching
foreign language skills, then to teaching a foreign language speech activity and finally to
teaching a foreign language communication. However, as the main contradiction of the modern
stage can be considered the fact that the proclaimed practical (communicative) objectives of
learning, implying mastering a foreign language as a means of communication, in most cases
are not implemented in practice, since the current formal speech approach is aimed mainly at
achieving pre-communicative results of teaching. In this case it is the formation of language
and speech competence of students which provides understanding patterns and the ability to
construct statements by analogy. The achievements of the students are estimated on Criteria-
based assessment system: formative – during the learning process and summative – at the end
of the learning period. In our schools the summative assessment takes place when the students
finish learning a unit (a module) of their textbooks and at the end of the term. According to the
official English language course program, the assessment test for the term should include the
tasks in listening, reading, writing and speaking (SPE, 2017; Razak et al., 2020). Analyzing the
results of the term tests it is often noted that the most mistakes are made in creative writing
tasks. This has become a topical issue that needs to be solved as early as possible, as it might
develop into a permanent disadvantage that will hinder students to achieve their objectives in
the future.
The current research is focused on teaching creative writing. The purpose is to highlight
that creative writing should be specially trained. Firstly, it is relevant to use the opportunities
provided by the Internet: e-mail correspondence, participation in distance competitions, IELTS
or TOEFL international exams, where writing an essay is one of the crucial points for defining
the level of language proficiency. Secondly, a developed written text provides a well-prepared
oral speech. Thirdly, the ability to formulate written texts for various purposes in an appropriate
way is an indicator of functional literacy, since students apply the gained knowledge in
practice.
The communicative competence is integrative and includes several components:
communication skills in speaking, listening, reading and writing; linguistic knowledge and
2. Experimental
In our research, we pay attention to teaching creative writing which needs to be taught
specifically. Firstly, it is relevant in the spot of opportunities provided by the Internet:
electronic correspondence, participation in remote competitions and IELTS testing, where
writing an essay is one of the essential points of determining the level of language proficiency.
Secondly, a well-developed written text provides a well-sounding oral speech. Thirdly, the
ability to formalize written texts for various purposes in a proper way is an indicator of
functional literacy, as students apply their knowledge in practice.
The value of academic, particularly analytic, writing is evident through the assignments
assigned across disciplines (Rausch, 2015). Considered a central aspect of western education,
analytic writing makes up a vital aspect of writing assignments assigned to students and serves
to elicit demonstration of competence in both writing and content (Cowhurst, 1990).
Cambridge Dictionary defines the word “writing” as “a person’s style of writing with a
pen on paper that can be recognized as their own; something that has been written or printed;
a person’s style of creating stories, poems, texts; activity of creating stories, poems,
articles.(Cambridge Dictionary, 2022)
As a linguistic term “writing’ refers to a complex speech skill, “an additional means of
communication to the sound speech with help of graphic signs it allows recording speech to
transmit it over distances, to preserve it in time” (Akhmanova, 1966). This definition reflects
two sides of writing: writing as a productive activity (to record speech for its transmission) and
writing as a result of this activity –“works”, that is, texts intended for reading by others.
The historical importance of writing has always been emphasized by both linguists and
historians. People who could write were appreciated in all periods of the human history as they
saved invaluable information about different epochs, events and outstanding personalities.
Writers possessed the ability to capture their thoughts, biographies and speeches.
Nowadays the school education provides the children with basic knowledge and skills to
read and write which they use along their life.
The fact that each age corresponds to a level of physical, mental and social development
is well known. It is obvious that students use acquired skills in various ways according to their
age. It is important for the teacher to know these features and take them into account and
purposefully use them to maximize the possibilities and comprehensive development of
students abilities.
The secondary school age covers the period from 11 to 17 years. It is considered a
transitional age from childhood to adolescence. During this period, there is an active process
of spiritual and physical maturation, restructuring of the organism. This age is especially
favorable for pedagogical stimulation and elaboration of self-awareness, self-education.
Adolescence is characterized by the ability to creative imagination and fantasy. The logic
of judgments, generalizations and conclusions is gradually increasing. However studying the
IELTS results taken by our students it was found out that the average score in writing is 5,5. In
comparison to reading – 7, 5; to speaking – 8; to listening – 8,5, writing results look quite low.
This way the problem was identified and we made an attempt to search for effective solutions
how to improve students’ writing skills.
To determine the causes of the low results in writing tasks a survey was conducted among
the students. The research revealed the following reasons: the students could not generate new
ideas to the given assignments; they did not manage to organize the ideas in their essays; they
did not know the structures of different kinds of essays or letters, they did not have appropriate
vocabulary to do the tasks, they failed to do the writing tasks because of time limit. The most
students confessed that they felt unsure while writing messages to their pen-friends in the
Internet because of the possible mistakes.
Currently, the problem of creativity is one of the most alarming issues in modern
psychology and is so relevant today that D.B. Bogoyavlenskaya calls it "the problem of the
century" (Bogoyavlenskaya, 2002)
“Stress is a well-known creativity killer”, stated psychologist Robert Epstein, PhD. He
added time as constraints that can do harm the inspiration of even the most imaginative
students. He is sure that many constraints are detrimental to creative expression. (Epstein,
2000).
A Kazakhstani methodologist and educator S.S. Kunanbayeva underlined that “With the
development of competency-based education, the field of pedagogy began to work on the
system of characteristic features and its educational process was defined as an environment
where individuals are prepared for continuous independent learning. The fundamental defining
features of “competency-based education” were also established:
- student/personality-centred learning; allowing students to select courses based on their
interests;
- The development of creative thought; the use of creativity and non-standard means for
problem-solving;
- an orientation towards individual self-development, the acknowledgement of the
uniqueness of each individual personality, creative self-development etc.” (Kunanbayeva,
2013, p. 103).
In the well-known Bloom’s pyramid of educational objectives, the concept “Evaluation”
stands at the top. While studying research materials on the distance courses “Shaping teaching
English” (https://coe.uoregon.edu/cds/files/2020 ) provided by the University of Oregon (the
USA) we found a revised version of this pyramid, where the concept "Creativity" is placed at
the pinnacle (Anderson, Krathwohl, Bloom, 2001) It means that creativity and creative thinking
are referred to strategic skills now. Indeed, the ability to analyze and evaluate their knowledge
is important for students, but it is more significant to be able to build new ideas for new
situations, consider things from a fresh perspective and different points of view, applying
knowledge in practice, and here creativity turns up as the most crucial skill.
Fredricka Reisman scrutinized the creativity from different points: as a process, a product,
a personality, environment and a technology. The researcher raises two very essential
questions: if creativity can be taught and if creativity can be measured. (Reisman, 2013).
Guilford argued that creativity is a continuous trait in all people, and that those individuals with
recognized creative talent simply have “more of what all of us have” (Guilford, 1950, p. 446).
As any learning activity writing needs assessment, and this involves gathering, organizing,
analyzing, and interpreting data. These data might be either qualitative or quantitative.
Qualitative refers to information based on observation, biographical information, special
records, or other similar efforts to view the subjects. Quantitative data analysis can estimate
numerical scores or results, such as number of words, number of used structures, time spent for
delivering the assignment, checklists, and self-report inventories.
Teachers, program coordinators, administrators, counselors, talent managers or
researchers who are concerned with such questions as, “What assessment tools are available to
assist in recognizing creativity in students…?” or “How might we evaluate and compare
various ways of assessing creativity?” are often posed, especially by those interested in
studying creativity and concerned with identifying creative talent or evaluating the
effectiveness of program goals involving creativity(Reisman, 2013).
As one of the main conditions of the course it is suggested avoiding summative
assessment, since traditional assessment often inhibits creativity. Students are afraid of
mistakes that will cause poor grades, and therefore often do not fully disclose their abilities. It
would be more effective to use formative assessment, to provide the students with constructive
feedbacks, informal and individual. (Anderson, Krathwohl, Bloom, 2001). The results of the
assessment of one student should be analyzed and compared only with data of this student in
the beginning and in the end of the course not with data of the students in a group.
Thus, through the use of various methods and techniques, the course is aimed at
developing the mechanisms of creativity in students.
Objectives of the course:
➢ Mastering communicative competencies, in particular the skills of written communication
and the abilities to express intentions in a productive way, which will have a positive impact
on further work and enhancement language proficiency.
➢ formation concepts about the stylistic means and the modern written genres;
➢ development (or improvement) of students' creative writing skills, abilities to give
information in the texts with a certain volume;
➢ understanding the increasing importance of using a foreign language;
Project tasks:
• to reveal the ideological significance of a foreign language,
• to deepen understanding of the role and place of a foreign language in various fields of
human activity;
• to give sufficient knowledge on the basis of written communication in a foreign language;
• to form the foreign language skills, both oral and written;
• to promote the development of critical thinking;
• to develop the skills of autonomous work with textbooks and other literature in a foreign
language;
4. CONCLUSIONS
Despite the fact that writing, according to the state educational standard, is the goal of
learning, in fact it is often still considered as a means, and in the theory of learning, the issues
of approaches to teaching writing at school remain undeveloped, which inevitably leads to
insufficient results.
REFERENCES
Akhmanova O.S. Slovar lingvisticheskikh terminov. Dictionary of linguistic terms, Moskva,
1966
Anderson, L., Krathwohl, D., & Bloom, B. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and
assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged ed.).
New York: Longman.
Bogoyavlenskaya D.B. Psychology of creative abilities: Textbook for students of higher
educational institutions. - M.: Publishing center “Academy”, 2002 -320 p
Crowhurst, M. (1990). Reading/writing relationships: An intervention study. Canadian
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research.
4(193), 193-220.
Epstein, R. (2000). The big book of creativity games. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Fromm, Erich, the Creative Attitude in: H. A. Anderson [Ed.]: Creativity and its Cultivation,
New York 1959, p. 54
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
International Journal of Language and Literary Studies Volume 2, Issue 4, 2020 Homepage
: http://ijlls.org/index.php/ijlls
Journal of Education, 15, 155-172.
https://coe.uoregon.edu/cds/files/2020/04/Blooms-Revised-Question-Frames.pdf
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/writing
AUTHORS' BIO
Rakhmanbergenova Yekaterina (contact person) – master student, Pavlodar
Pedagogical University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan; an English teacher, a teacher trainer, a head
of Regional English Teachers Association; е-mail: katerakhman@gmail.com , contact phone
87054600324.
Kulakhmetova Mergul – Candidate of Philological Sciences, professor, Pavlodar
Pedagogical University, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan.