Case 29 Milwaukee Regional Health System - XLSX 3
Case 29 Milwaukee Regional Health System - XLSX 3
Case 29 Milwaukee Regional Health System - XLSX 3
Copyright 2018 Foundation of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Not for sale.
This case focuses on various aspects of revenue cycle management and differences between chargemaster
prices and the amounts actually collected from different payers. Unlike most models, this model does not hav
separate INPUT DATA, KEY OUTPUT, and MODEL-GENERATED DATA sections. Rather, the model is divid
templates that each focuses on one important aspect of the case; the top template focuses on benchmarking
and the bottom template focuses on chargemaster prices versus reimbursement rates.
This model consists of a complete case analysis--no changes need to be made. However, in the top template
students must choose which of the metrics are best suited for the case and then justify their choices.
In the bottom template, some of the cells are colored red. In the student model, these cells contain a zero or
Students must enter the appropriate value needed to complete the calculation. When this is done, any error c
will be corrected and the solution will appear.
Medicare
Base payment rate $341.61 $17,955.00
No payment denial rate @ 3 percent (10.25) (538.65)
Part A deductible of $1,184 @ 65% collections rate (414.40)
Part B deductible of $140 @ 78% collections rate (30.80)
Total reimbursement $300.56 $17,001.95
Percentage of charges 10.7% 34.0%
Medicaid
Rate of $284/procedure or $2,044/day $284.00 $8,176.00
No payment denial rate of 0.5% (1.42) (40.88)
Total reimbursement $282.58 $8,135.12
Percentage of charges 10.1% 16.3%
Commercial/Managed Care
58% of charge $1,624.00 $29,000.00
No payment denial rate of 12% (194.88) (3,480.00)
20% patient coinsurance @ 40% collection rate 129.92 2,320.00
Total reimbursement $1,559.04 $27,840.00
Percentage of charges 55.7% 55.7%
Self-Pay/No Insurance
30% discount $1,960.00 $35,000.00
5% self-pay collection rate (1,862.00) (33,250.00)
Total reimbursement $98.00 $1,750.00
Percentage of charges 3.5% 3.5%
Variance
Hospital Clinic
-2.9 -2.2 ↓ The arrows indicate the
-8.1% 1.1% ↓ sign of a favorable
variance. For example,
-0.6% 0.3% ↓ a down arrow indicates
that a negative value is
good--an up arrow
indicates that a postive
variance is good.
-4.0% 0.8% ↑
-4.7% 1.3% ↑
-4.7% 12.3% ↑
-7.1% 0.5% ↑
0.6% -0.4% ↓
0.3% -0.4% ↓
-0.4 1.7 ↓
-6.3% 8.3% ↓
-2.9 0.0 ↓
2.2% -3.0% ↑
0.7% -0.4% ↓
-4.4% 4.0% ↑
3.4% -4.2% ↑
0.6 -0.9 ↓
Net Payments/ By
Overall Metrics: Net collection rate Charges x 100 97%
Percent of
inappropriate
admissions/
procedures that were
% of denials based on deemed not medically
Case Management: medical necessity necessary 27%
Clinical-Charge
how many claims had
Processing:
to be edited due to
being incomplete,
% of charge related edits denied, or paid late
Codes fail to capture
Medical Records: % under-coded all work performed
Paid claims/ total
Billing: Resolve Rate claims 96%
total number of
successful (approved)
transactions/ the total
number of attempted
transactions over a
Payment Posting: Transaction success rate given time period 100%
Clinical-Charge Processing:
Charge lag days
Late charge %
Medical Records:
Days in total discharged not final billed
Coding quality score
Billing:
Initial denial rate
Clean claim rate
Payment Posting:
% of payments posted electronically
Net days revenue in credit balance
Preregistration rate
Insurance verification rate
Registration:
Point-of-service collection rate
Registration quality score
Case Management:
Preauthorization denial rate
% of medical necessity write-offs
https://www.mgma.com/event-registration/mgma18-the-operations-conference/session-handouts/con301_
Justification
Shows an organization its revenue cycle
efficiency- is a measure of a medical
practice’s effectiveness in collecting
reimbursement dollars/how much is being
collected versus what is eligible for collection
The number of
days between the
Longer wait times increase
Average Time to scheduling date
the risk of losing patients
Scheduling: New Patient and appointment 24 days
and therefore losing patient
Appointment date, on average,
revenue
across all
appointments
Percent of
This demonstrates how
inappropriate
effective your case
% of denials based admissions/
Case managers are at determing
on medical procedures that 27%
Management: what is medically
necessity were deemed not
necessary based on
medically
insurance guidelines
necessary
Comphrensive look at
how many claims
claims to capture how well
Clinical- had to be edited
% of charge related your clinical documentation
Charge due to being
edits of services provided is
Processing: incomplete, denied,
translated to line-item
or paid late
charges
Codes fail to Uncoded bills means lose
Medical
% under-coded capture all work 33% of revenue that should be
Records:
performed generated by the hospital
The amount of claims that
Paid claims/ total
Billing: Resolve Rate 96% are sucessfully resolved or
claims
paid beyond
total number of
successful
(approved) measure of how many
Payment Transaction transactions/ the payments are approved
100%
Posting: success rate total number of based on total number
attempted attempted
transactions over a
given time period
Clinical-Charge Processing:
Charge lag days
Late charge %
Medical Records:
Days in total discharged not final billed
Coding quality score
Billing:
Initial denial rate
Clean claim rate
Payment Posting:
% of payments posted electronically
Net days revenue in credit balance
Preregistration rate
Insurance verification rate
Registration:
Point-of-service collection rate
Registration quality score
Case Management:
Preauthorization denial rate
% of medical necessity write-offs
erations-conference/session-handouts/con301_davis-scott-sagarra_making-bank-managing-an