Ac Succession Planning 20210125
Ac Succession Planning 20210125
Ac Succession Planning 20210125
For assurance
Issue: To set out the ICO’s approach to Board level succession planning
Reason for report: The ICO has identified a risk in relation to the
capacity and resilience of the Management Board and Executive Team.
Ensuring that the future strategic leadership of the organisation is secured
is key, in particular in a time of significant changes to the regulatory,
political and societal landscape. As such, it is important that the ICO’s
Board is in a position to maintain the necessary skills, expertise and
knowledge required to provide governance, direction and strategic
oversight of the organisation.
The roles of the Non-Executive members are appointed for fixed terms
and, though the tenures of individuals may be extended beyond one
term, there are established time frames for the replacement of Board
members.
The table below shows the current tenures of the Management Board
members.
1
Management Board Member End of Tenure
Ailsa Beaton 31 July 2022
Nicola Wood 31 July 2022
David Cooke 31 July 2024
Jane McCall 31 July 2024
Peter Hustinx 31 March 2022
During the Autumn of 2020 a skills matrix was developed to better map
the skills, experience and expertise within the current Management
Board. Each Board member self-assessed their skills and experience in a
range of criteria which are required to be delivered by an effective Board.
Crucially, the exercise provided insight into the areas which may need to
be the focus for future recruitment of Management Board members when
current members leave. It showed that future recruitment exercises to
replace roles would benefit from attracting candidates with particular
experience in the following areas:
2
• Knowledge of the international information rights landscape.
• Policy making and/or developing regulations and laws.
• Understanding of the needs of business and the wider economic
context in relation to information rights.
• Embedding equality, diversity and inclusion.
• Scrutinising incentive structures.
• Ensuring the principles of sound financial management are followed.
• Knowledge of finance, accounting, and treasury management.
• Long term budgeting and financial planning.
• Knowledge of internal control and audit.
The skills matrix helped to identify that there is a depth of strengths and
experience across the Board in all aspects of its work. This means that if
any individual were to leave the Board will not be completely devoid of
experience in any of area skills and knowledge identified in the skills
matrix, though there would be greater short term vulnerability.
Among other functions, this committee will have responsibility for the
recruitment of Executive Directors and Non-Executive Management Board
Members, and therefore will have a central role in the appointment of new
Board members.
3
Scheduling recruitment
The focus of our next recruitment is the end of tenure of Ailsa Beaton and
Nicola Wood, who are the longest serving Board members, as well as the
additional NED role.
The key functions which Ailsa and Nicola undertake include chairing of the
Audit Committee and the Remuneration Advisory Panel. Nicola is also the
current Senior Non-Executive Management Board Member, and this
function will need to be appointed.
In addition, the agreement with Peter Hustinx which is due to reach the
end of its tenure in March 2022. It is Peter’s first term on the
Management Board and so has potential to be extended.
However, the longer than usual lead in time for the August appointments
would allow the successful candidates orientate themselves to the
organisation in the lead up to their commencement, potentially also
allowing a period of overlap with departing Board members to support
greater continuity.
The schedule for the next anticipated recruitment round for Non-Executive
Board members would therefore be as follows:
4
representation on the Audit Committee, recruitment to this position
should commence in March 2021.
The skills matrix provides us with a record of the experience which would
need to be replaced. We would expect to be able to make an appointment
within three months of the departure being confirmed, thus providing a
degree of continuity for the size and structure of the Board.
Diversity
5
opportunities for individuals to gain experience in board, committee and
panel work to help widen the applicant pool for future NED roles.
The scheme is currently in development, but should allow us to enhance
the development opportunities for current ICO employees, create a pool
of future talent, enhance the pool of future NEDs for the ICO from other
regulatory backgrounds, supporting our succession planning approach and
enhancing the diversity of future candidates.
Executive roles
The Executive Management Board roles are all currently filled. The recent
recruitment to Executive Director positions which commenced in the latter
part of 2020 have filled three newly created roles, ensuring there is also
resilience for the Executive Director – Technology and Innovation role
which is due to be vacated this year. This includes:
We also intend to ensure that future iterations of the skills matrix cover
Executive roles and to ensure that any areas which should be considered
for future recruitment are identified.
Next steps: The next steps will be to take forward the recommendations
set out in the paper regarding the recruitment of Non-Executive Directors
through the Nominations Committee.
6
Resource implications: The resources implications are known about,
being planned for and are able to be managed within the ICO’s HR
department.
Equality, diversity and inclusion considerations: As set out above,
it is important to ensure that equality, diversity and inclusion is taken into
consideration throughout any future recruitment campaign for Board
members.
Alignment with values: Ensuring the future capacity and resilience of
the Board will ensure the ICO’s strategic leadership can continue to
deliver on the ICO’s values of ambition, service focus and collaboration.
Impact on Risks and Opportunity Register: The approach set out
above forms part of the current mitigation of risk 81 – ‘Management
Board and Executive Team capacity and resilience may not be sufficient to
retain clarity of leadership and direction during a critical period of change
to the regulatory landscape resulting in delay to the achievement of the
IRSP goals and operational, regulatory and organisational priorities.’
List of Annexes: /