4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

1 4D Hyper-Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos.

Abstract: Consider the paradigm of a 4D Hyper-Spherical, Holographic Fractal, “Space~Time-
Memory” Cosmos. This model maps the geometry of 3-Dimensional Space + layers of 1-
Dimensional Time to each of the most fundamental physical properties compiled by CODATA &
NIST. Namely Magnetic Permeability, μ0, Electric Permittivity, ε0 & Vacuum Impedance, Z0, along
with quantum-scale Planck units (length, time, mass, Charge. The proposed model maps these
quantities with 4D Sacred Geometry. Essentially, sphere-packing of Plank Spherical Oscillators
(PSU’s, aka Planck voxels).

The proposed 4D Hyper-Spherical Model pulls together many insights, mathematics and key
equations which unlock many mysteries of the universe. Let’s construct this cosmological model
and then ask the model to answer these questions: What is charge? What is an electron? What is a
proton? Why doesn’t the Higgs Field theory include gravity or understand the quantization of
mass? How does gravity work? What is the true nature of time? Is Universal expansion really
accelerating -or- are our perceptions warped by local deceleration of time? These answers can be
found by determining which NIST CODATA Physical quantities are truly constant throughout time
vs. which are covariant with the passage of time?

1.1 Brief Background

The author’s personal cosmological quest has, for years, focused on studying physics equations involving
the properties of Planck Units & “particles” – all along hoping to solve for big-G and other properties as
a system of 4D Space~Time & Mass~Charge physics equations. The realization that the properties of
matter are dominated by the ever-present Ubiquiuum1 – the Space~Time medium. This journey has led
to mapping Sacred Geometry to the Cosmic Onion Space~Time geometry.
My life’s dream has been to become part of a team of mathematicians, theoreticians, scientists, engineers,
inventors, pioneering frontiers of scientific knowledge & understanding. The dream has materialized in
two stages, so far, first working with the R&D Teams at Torus Tech under Nassim Haramein and now,
working with the Mathemagicians Think-tank, under Robert Edward Grant. The intelligence level of
these team members are truly mind boggling with their insightful knowledge spanning everything from
number theory, cryptography, geometry, mathematics, fundamental physics, quantum physics to life
sciences, archeology, new technologies, and even lofty thinkers exploring Cosmic Consciousness.
These teams have created opportunities to collaborate with many heart-centered humanitarian minded
brainiac’s. My hope, herein, is to contribute a few key pieces to this Grand Cosmic Puzzle – a complete,
mathematically precise, description of the nature of physical reality and of Space~Time itself.

1.2 Breaking free of limitations of old Scientific Paradigms

“Space is not empty. It is full, a plenum as opposed to a vacuum,
and is the ground for the existence of everything, including ourselves.
The universe is not separate from this cosmic sea of energy.” ― David Bohm

1 Ubiquiuum: 4D medium which permeates all of Space~Time. (Term coined by Scott Brown.)
© John Wsol -1- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

1.2.1 Nothing vs. Ether vs. Space~Time Medium

Originally, Newton postulated an “aether” that was believed to be a static 3D medium through which
material objects moved. Thus, most scientists thought that the Michaelson-Morley Interferometer
experiment would detect a significant “ether drag” with respect to Earth’s motion through space.

But we do NOT exist within a static 3D volume, rather, Space persists from time-quantum to time-
quantum across 4D Space~Time, within an energetic 4D Superfluid medium -- no viscosity & no aether
drag. Instead, this medium has properties of Impedance, Magnetic Permeability and Electric
Permittivity. With each Planck-time all of Space expands out to the next Onion layer. It took 13.762
billion years for the duration of our second to grow to the 1.85x10^43 Planck times per second that is
today. This is the reciprocal of Planck time.
1.1733693920e-51 qkg ℏ (1a)
1.0e-11 relative uncertainty 𝑚ℓ 𝑡ℓ =
𝑐!
The true understanding of “Particle-Wave Duality” can be found by realizing the relationship between
“wavicles” -- being the underlying "cause" -- versus the "effect" of quantum increments of mass-time --
leaving a trail of particles in its path through Space~Time. Wavicles can be conceptualized as double
twisted spring-shaped wave constructs -- which interact with the Sacred Geometric quantum-scale
energetic structure of Space~Time. The 1st twist is like the minor radius of a torus – it is the charge radius
for the wavicle. This very frequent quantized manifestations of elementary charge occur at 11.706 times
slower than the Planck Frequency (1/√𝛼). These charge manifestations represent the kinetic energy
(quantum momentum) of so called “particles”. The 2nd twist is like the major radius of a torus and
accounts for the surprisingly infrequent manifestations of mass -- on the order of 2.4e22 times slower for
electrons (spread across the magnitude of the Bohr radius) and about 1.3e19 times slower for protons &
neutrons (essentially the Yukawa confinement). (See equations in section 1.4.2.)

1.2.2 A Holistic Approach to Unifying Space~Time with ALL Quantum-level Quantities

Cosmological models are scientific paradigms that SHOULD closely parallel the nature of reality. Each
part of the model ought to be in a one-to-one correspondence with aspects of reality. Let me introduce
you to a paradigm which does just that. By mapping each of the Fundamental properties of Planck units
& that grasps the totality of Space~Time with quantum-scale resolution.

1.2.3 Physics Equations need a Geometric Context to have meaning.

Three steps ahead to come to an understanding of how this universe works:

(1) Describe a Space~Time model which defines the context for physical existence.

(2) Map each of the properties of Magnetic Permeability, Electric Permittivity, and the Impedance of
Free Space to aspects of this Space~Time geometry.

(3) Dig into two of Nassim’s equations which unlocked an understanding of the holographic principle.

© John Wsol -2- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

1.3 Implementing Space~Time of our Cosmos

1.3.1 Cosmic Onion = Space~Time Holographic 4D Hypersphere
What we call our “physical universe” exists within this 4D
Spherical Space~Time geometry -- the holographic reality
in which we all dwell. The geometries of 4D wave-
functions, described herein, span the circumference of the
entire universe expanding incrementally by the Planck
Length at a frequency equal to the reciprocal of the Planck
time while the all-pervasive Ubiquium2 grants an
increment of its mass-time.
Higher Perspective is the Key to Understanding.
The Cosmic Onion Model enables us to envision our ever-
expanding Universe “as an outside observer”. It employs
a 4D hypersphere with Onion Layers of Planck Time
representing the whole Cosmos: past, present and future.
This 4D volume is full of this elastic fluidic medium under
negative pressure -- stret c h e d . This 4D spherical
standing wave is a super-fluid, thus no viscosity and no
aether drag. With names like “Dominant Field”, “Source Field”, “Higgs Field” or “Dielectric Field”,
knowingly or not, all these systems of thought are trying to describe these rotational oscillating quantum
layers of time – a 4D Hyperspherical standing wave.
Starting from the center, Cosmic Time is an integer count of layers outward. The ever-expanding spherical
layers (3D surfaces layered by 4D Hyperspherical standing waves). Collectively, these layers record a
hologram of the spatial dimensions at each moment of time. Near the center is the Cosmic Microwave
Background -- which is how our universe looked just as it became transparent.

1.3.2 Cosmic Planetarium Show

Envision the entire universe as being a projection from inside-out – like the projector in the middle of a
planetarium. Rather than projecting the local stars & planets as viewed from Earth, this cosmic planetarium’s
dome (representing all of 3D Space) is the holographic screen on which the filamentary distribution of galaxies
is projected. However, this dome continually grows during the entire planetarium show as a function of the
passage of Time. Thus, the expansion of space is one-and-the-same as the forward flow of Time. I cannot
over emphasize this notion. In other words, if the universe could stop expanding -- time “itself” would stop.

1.3.3 The Now Manifold & Space~Time Memory

Moment-by-moment the universe manifests as a 3D wavefront surface expanding as a 4D spherical standing
wave. All that we experience -- all-of-space as it exists right now -- I call the Now Manifold. Massive objects
inhibit Space~Time expansion thereby creating a temporal dent in and around the object – often referred to as
a “gravity well”. Think of each Onion-layer as being thin holographic film. As the Now-Manifold expands
so called “particles” are caused by double twisted wavefunctions. Electron-wavicles, proton-wavicles and
neutron-wavicles. The high periodically manifest charge and occasionally manifest mass. As they do they

2 Ubiquium the ubiquitous, omnipresent Space~Time medium.

© John Wsol -3- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

create a trail of tiny distortions in this Space~Time structure – thus a memory of the event is retained in within
and between the quantum thin layers described herein.

1.4 Holographic/Geometric Approach – Sacred Geometry at Quantum Scale

Imagine this Sacred Geometry pattern as
spanning two adjacent Onion-Layers as they
oscillate 180-degrees out-of-phase. By
applying Nassim’s Holographic/ Geometric
approach it seemed reasonable to me that –
along with the unfoldment of time -- comes the
manifestation of space, charge and mass.
(1) ALL the mass that a “particle”
manifests – manifests on the surface of its
orbital radius. The perimeter of the orbital
radius has a curvature associated with it –
namely the charge radius of the wavefunction
that is the root-cause of the “particle”.
(2) EVERY second that passes, each
particle in the universe re-manifests its rest
mass.
(3) For protons and neutrons their surfaces
touch the extreme limits of Space~Time
curvature. This means that their charge radii are literally event horizons of tiny black holes! And, with the
passage of time each second adds another layer to the orbital radius. The logical inferences are unavoidable.
That means every particle is growing in mass and contains within its event horizon– the entire history of mass
manifestations! Thus, each particle has two types of mass: (1) Rest mass is the mass manifested during the
current second’s worth of time. (2) Holographic mass is the mass manifested during all prior seconds.

(4) Although the duration of a Planck-Tick is constant, the value WE associate with the Planck-Time is gauged
against our “time metric”, that is to say the standard that we use to count the passage of time – for all us
Earthlings the standard that science uses is “a second”. As the universe ages the duration of a second slowly
grows. We perceive the speed of light as constant, this Model states that all distances and all objects grow
proportional with our time-metric – the second. (The Earth expands with time, but its surface spreads slightly
slower than its expanding interior – explanation comes later.) With the appropriate adjustments for Special &
General relativity, every meter stick & pendulum gets longer and -- without the number of atoms increasing
-- each individual electron, proton, neutron increases in mass at exactly this same “co-variant” rate that “our
second” is growing. As we get into the dimensional analysis of fundamental physical constants and their
roles in our physics equations will make these co-variant assertions obvious. Section 2 derives the meaning of
“magnetic permeability” of space and its role in explaining all the properties of the so called “Vacuum”.

1.4.1 Time vs. Clocks which “count” ticks as a means of measuring time
Within each physics equation, whenever we examine the dimensional units of physical quantities, pay
attention to the distinction between the “duration of a second” vs. “a frequency”. Becoming aware of the
distinction between the passage of time (traversing Onion-layers of time) vs. counting swings of a pendulum

© John Wsol -4- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

or the vibrations of a quartz crystal or the precise oscillations of Cesium 133, – these clock rates are all subject
to adjustments for 3 types of Relativity. These will be explained with quantum clarity when we get that far.

1.4.2 One Essential Requirement of True Cosmological Understanding

Defining the fundamental characteristics of particles from first principles, and without free parameters,
is of great importance as not only will it provide information about the structure of subatomic particles
but also the source of mass and the nature of spacetime itself.3
1.4.3 Planck-scale Units vs. SI Units and the magnitude of their quantiles
The table below documents the fundamental quantities

15 calc 'l_P t_P l_P%t_P c m_P m_P%t_P m_P*omg_P hBar%^2 q_P %:(2*h%Zo)’
┌──────────┬───────────────────────┬───────┬────────────┬───┬────────┐
│Quantity │Value │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K │dt │SIunits │
├──────────┼───────────────────────┼───────┼────────────┼───┼────────┤
│l_P │ 1.61625409490756e_35 │ 0│1 0 0 0 0│_1 │m │ Planck Length
│t_P │ 5.39124334778149e_44 │ 0│0 1 0 0 0│_1 │s │ Planck time
│l_P%t_P │ 2.99792458000000e8 │ 0│1 _1 0 0 0│ 0 │m/s │ Plank(length/time)=c
│c │ 2.99792458000000e8 │ 0│1 _1 0 0 0│ 0 │m/s │ c = Speed of Light
│m_P │ 2.17643559439662e_8 │6.1e_11│0 0 1 0 0│ 1 │kg │ Planck Mass
│m_P%t_P │ 4.03698266614551e35 │6.1e_11│0 _1 1 0 0│ 0 │kg/s │ Planck Mass/Planck time
│m_P*omg_P │ 4.03698266614551e35 │7.7e_11│0 _1 1 0 0│ 0 │kg/s │ m_P * PlanckFrequency
│m_P*t_P │ 1.17336939201656e_51 │6.1e_11│0 1 1 0 0│ 0 │s kg │ Quantum mass-time increment
│hBar%c^2 │ 1.17336939201656e_51 │6.1e_11│0 1 1 0 0│ 0 │s kg │ Quantum mass-time increment
│q_P │ 1.87554603829021e_18 │ 5e_11│0 0 0 1 0│ 1 │C │ Planck Charge
│%:(2*h%Zo)│ 1.87554603829021e_18 │3.1e_11│0 0 0 1 0│ 1 │C │ Planck Charge exact equation
└──────────┴───────────────────────┴───────┴────────────┴───┴────────┘
The magnitude of Planck Time & Planck Length are clearly a “quantum-scale” quantities. What struck me as
strange is Planck Charge does not have a “fundamental” (single) SI unit – rather it is expressed as Amp-seconds =
(Coulombs/second) * second. Here the definition of Amperes bundles in a “per second.”
Applying this technique to the kilogram – we define a quantum-kilogram as:
qKg = 1.173369392x10^-51 [kg*sec] = (m_P * t_P)
This resolves the units’ issue that some might complain about in section 1.5.2 “On the Electrodynamics of Moving
Bodies”. The product of mass with time, especially when the time duration is such a tiny increment, clearly describes
an integration. This quantum increment of mass is inside the following integral formula:

# &'()*+
The Planck Mass: 2.175686189e-8 kg = ∫, [1.173369392x10!"# [𝑘𝑔] 𝑑𝑡ℓ [𝑠𝑒𝑐]] (1b)

Ever since Newton gave us F=ma, our science has gauged masses with the duration of a second. That means that
the unit we call a “kilogram” has implied within it a “/per second”. This tiny 10^-51 quantity is the source of
the Planck Density -AND- whenever any Wavicle manifests mass – this is the increment that all particles manifest
mass. Each particle type has a specific angular frequency that it manifests mass at. Arthur Compton gave us
formulae for wavelengths and angular frequencies for electrons, protons, and any other particle, x, defined by:
# $- % .
Wavicle wavelength: 𝜆" = Wavicle radians/sec frequency: 𝜔" = (2,3)
$- % ℏ
Dividing the Energy of the particle by h-bar gives us its angular frequency (radians/second). Solving (2) & (3) for
mass gives us these relations:

3 Haramein, Nassim: “The Electron and the Holographic Mass Solution”

© John Wsol -5- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

ℎ ℏ (4)
𝑚" = 𝜆" = ! 𝜔"
𝑐 𝑐
Parallel
16 calc 'm_p2018 m_p m_e2018 m_e m_p2018%m_e2018 m_p%m_e MpMe_2018'
┌───────────────┬────────────────────────┬───────┬─────────┬───┬───────┐
│Quantity │Value digit┬16 │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K│dt │SIunits│ Calculated: 2020-09-12
├───────────────┼────────────────────────┼───────┼─────────┼───┼───────┤
│m_p2018 │ 1.672621923690000e_27 │2.5e_10│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ CODATA 2018
│m_p │ 1.672621925515432e_27 │3.9e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ mass of proton
│m_e2018 │ 9.109383701500001e_31 │2.4e_10│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ CODATA 2018
│m_e │ 9.109383711491229e_31 │1.7e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ calculated electron mass
│m_p2018%m_e2018│ 1.836152673440002e3 │3.5e_10│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ calc from CODATA2018
│m_p%m_e │ 1.836152673430000e3 │4.3e_11│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ calc using lowest relUnc
│MpMe_2018 │ 1.836152673430000e3 │4.9e_11│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ CODATA2018 proton/electron
└───────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────┴─────────┴───┴───────┘ mass ratio.
Particle, x abbreviation mass (kg) lambda, λ (m) omega ω (rad/s)
electron m_e2018 9.109383702e-31 2.426310239e-12 7.763440706e20
muon m_m 1.883531627e-28 1.17344411e-14 1.605233305e23
proton m_p 1.672621924e-27 1.321409855e-15 1.425486241e24
neutron m_n 1.674927498e-27 1.319590906e-15 1.427451159e24
PSU m_P 2.175686189e-8 1.01587219e-34 1.854221018e43

1.4.4 All this talk about “not invariant” constants: Double-speak or Deeper Understanding!
Consider this quote from www.quantumofgravity.com:

Gaussian Curvature and Length Scale

This is what brings us to Gauss’ wish regarding the existence of an absolute unit of measurement. Any curved,
maximally symmetric spacetime is described by a single number ℝ which can be either positive or negative (but not
zero). Such a spacetime is not invariant under the scale transformations of the former mentioned above and observers
in this spacetime will be able to determine the value of ℝ by making measurements on large enough scales. This
number ℝ, would then play the role of an absolute unit of measurement, since one can associate a distance:
1
𝑟=
√ℝ
by taking the inverse of the square root of the curvature. What does all this have to do with the Planck
scale? Well, theories of quantum gravity such as String Theory and Loop Quantum Gravity (LQG)
generically predict that spacetime is not infinitely smooth and that if we zoom in to small enough scales
we will find that the smoothness gives way to a discrete, foamy structure, in much the same way that
zooming in on the surface of water would eventually cause the smooth appearance of water to break
down as we approached a scale where the size of water molecules becomes significant. In other words,
there is some absolute minimum length scale, usually written as lP – where the subscript P stands for
“Planck”, and called the “Planck scale“. From the discussion above we can conclude that if there is such
a minimum length scale then it must correspond to a macroscopic geometric curvature of the order:
1
ℝ!"#$%& ~
ℓ('
This is a very interesting result because it implies that there is a connection between physics at the smallest
possible scales (the Planck scale) and physics at cosmological scales.
As we explore the equations in this document, keep in mind this idea of a connection between this
Cosmic Curvature equation and the size and age of the universe. I’m anticipating another discovery.

© John Wsol -6- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

1.5 Schwarzschild’s exact solution to Einstein’s Field Equations & Nassim’s

Holographic Approach
Karl Schwarzschild’s 1916 solution to Einstein’s Field Equations determined the critical radius, rS, where
the escape velocity equals c, the speed of light. (Harramein, 2013)
2𝐺𝑚 (5a)
𝑟) =
𝑐(
A Proton’s charge radius, rp, has been one of the most challenging physical properties to measure. In
Nassim’s equation below4 note that 𝑎* is the Bohr radius, 𝛼, the fine structure constant, & mp /me is the
proton-to-electron mass ratio:
2020: 8.41235640428985e-16 m 3.4e-10
4𝑎* 𝛼
2021: 8.41235640424147e-16 m 4.0e-11 𝑟+ = 𝑚 (5b)
+
relative uncertainty^ 𝑚,

Given the most accurate input values calculated by my physics equation-matrix software, this formula
computes the most accurate value yet published. The relative uncertainty is about 0.04 of one part in a
Billion. Nassim’s holographic approach defines the fundamental geometric relationships which reduce
to dimensionless ratios.
4 3
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎#+-,., 4𝜋𝑟+( 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒('#)*) 𝜋𝑟𝑝
𝜂+ = = 𝑅' = =3 (5,6)
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎/0123".%245%#6 𝜋𝑟ℓ( 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒+,-.%/0'#)*) 4 𝜋𝑟3
3 ℓ
Nassim Haramein’s equations5 show that the mass of a particle is equal to the Planck Mass times a “space
curvature factor” (4 for the proton) times the ratio of surface-area volume (1 Planck thinness) to volume
expressed in terms of Planck Spherical Volumes.

CODATA 2018 vs. my Calcs. 𝜂+

𝑚+ = 2 𝑚
1.67262192369000e-27 kg 2.5e-10 𝑅+ ℓ
1.67262192551543e-27 kg 4.8e-11 Proton Surface / Proton Volume (7)

relative uncertainty^ in flat Planck Areas / in Planck Spherical Units

Note: 𝑚+ is the proton mass, 𝑟ℓ Planck radius = half the Planck length:

Thanks to Nassim’s Holographic/Geometric approach this made it obvious that – along with the
unfoldment of time -- comes the manifestation of space, charge and mass.
(1) ALL the mass that a “particle” manifests – manifests along the surface of its orbital radius. For
an electron that’s the Bohr radius, for a proton/neutron it’s essentially the Yukawa confinement.
(2) Each “Wavicle” type -- EVERY second -- manifests the rest mass associated with its particle type.
(3) For protons and neutrons their surfaces touch the extreme limits of Space~Time curvature. This
means their surfaces are literally event horizons of tiny black holes! Each second adds another layer
to those surfaces. The logical inferences are unavoidable -- every particle is growing in mass and

4 2019: Baker, A.V: Compilation of Interesting Physics Relationships (private document)

5 Haramein, N.: Quantum Gravity and the Holographic Mass, Physical Review & Research Int’l, 27-Apr-2013
© John Wsol -7- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

contains the entire history of the mass manifestations is left in the wake of each particles path through
Space~Time. Thus, each particle has two types of mass: (1) Rest mass is the mass manifested during
the current second’s worth of time. (2) Holographic mass is the mass manifested during all prior
seconds. By completely grasping this idea of the “wake of particles Holographic mass” we will come
to understand both Dark Matter and quantum gravity.

(4) Although the duration of a 1-time quantum, 1-length quantum, 1-charge quantum & 1 mass-time
quantum is constant, the value WE associate with the Planck-time is gauged against our emergent
“time metric”. The standard that scientific Earthlings use is the “second”. As the universe ages the
duration of a second slowly gr o w s. This means that all distances and all objects grow proportional
with our time-metric (the second). With the appropriate adjustments for Special & General relativity,
every meter stick & pendulum will get longer while the number of atoms stays constant. Because the
root-cause wavefunctions for electrons, protons, & neutrons have more time to manifest mass. This
covariance happens at the same rate that the Planck-frequency grows – Planck tick-tocks per second.

Understanding these aspects of this Cosmic Onion Model will help to explain the true nature of
Space~Time. Our Cosmos is the quantum-scale fractal manifestations of interacting wave-functions
which create quarks, charge, mass and the “forces” of nature.

1.5.1 Eric Dollard’s Contributions to this Endeavor

Special thanks to Eric Dollard for emphasizing the distinctions between: Space vs. Counter-Space, Time
vs. Frequency, & Electric vs. Magnetic Induction. And, surprisingly, for electrical engineers, the
“Relative” unimportance of E=Mc2!

Yet, we all thank Einstein for Special and General Relativity and his heartfelt inspirations and inspiring
words:
The important thing is not to stop questioning.
Curiosity has its own reason for existing.
One cannot help but be in awe when he contemplates the mysteries of eternity,
of the marvelous structure of reality.
It is enough if one tries merely to comprehend a little of this mystery every day.
Never lose a holy curiosity.

1.5.2 “On the Electrodynamics of moving Bodies”

Over-emphasis of E = Mc2 has distracted from the more generalized mass + momentum form6:

E2 = (Mc2)2 + (pc)2 (8a)

This made scientists “focus” too much onto the mass side of this
formula and not enough emphasis on the momentum (pc) of
Energy Wavicles. Wavicles are the root cause of “particles” -- not the other
M0c2 way around. They are double twisted vortex wave-functions where

6Thanks to William Brown who, during our cosmological conversations, reminded me of this equation. So much
of Eric’s assertions suddenly made perfect sense in the context of this awareness of the “momentum of charge.”
© John Wsol -8- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

the charge radius is the minor axis of a torus and the Orbital radius
is the major radius (which defines the wavicle’s mass confinement).
(pc) momentum

From (8a) can we get new insights into what momentum is? Dividing by c2:

𝑝! = (𝐸 ! − (𝑀1 𝑐 ! )! )/𝑐 ! (8b)

That leaves us just one step in defining momentum in terms of energy. Then we can equate that to the
classic definition of momentum, product of mass and velocity.

8𝐸 ! − (𝑀1 𝑐 ! )! (8c)
𝑝 = 𝑚𝑣 =
𝑐
These wave functions create holographic images on the backdrop of the 3D surfaces of the Cosmic Onion
layers as the Now Manifold passes through them. Physical reality is the manifestations of these 3D
holographic images. The physics equations reveal that “so called particles” are really manifestations of
these double-twisted spring-shaped waves. They exist as a wave of pure momentum
99.99999999999999999+% of the time. Only during a brief moment, one Planck time, do wavicles manifest
an increment of Mass~Time = (m_P*t_P). If the math behind Higgs field can connect to this, then Higgs
stands a chance of enduring the test of time.
1.17336939201656e-51 qkg ℏ (9)
6.0e-12 relative uncertainty 𝑚ℓ 𝑡ℓ =
𝑐!
hBar, with units of angular momentum, when divided by c2 converts this to its energy-equivalent mass.
Thus 1.173369x10^-51 kg-seconds IS the source of mass for all “particles”. Turns out our idea of mass
ties the duration of a second to be proportional to the numeric value we associate with our unit of mass
the "kilogram". In other words, ever since Newton defined Force = Mass × acceleration, our definition of
mass of an object is gauged by the duration of a second. (Read that again.)
1.9560827616511e9 Joules ℏ
𝐸ℓ = 𝑚ℓ 𝑐 ! = (10)
7.3e-12 relative uncertainty 𝑡ℓ
Sorry Higgs, although CERN’s boson is not what they were hoping for, it IS something even more
profoundly significant than anyone imagined. For it reveals what happens as protons, near the speed of
light, turn almost all their E=Mc2 energy into Charge Momentum Energy! The surprise is that this might
NOT be the normal fundamental charge – I’m exploring the possibility that it shifts from elementary charge
towards Planck Charge. Higgs boson within 3.7% of proton mass expressed as eV/c2 divided by the Fine
Structure constant.
125.09 GeV 𝑚' (𝑐^2/𝑒)
𝑚2344( ≈ (11)
2.7% relative uncertainty 𝛼

1.6 Time vs. Clocks which “count” ticks as a means of measuring time
Within each physics equation, whenever you examine the dimensional units of physical quantities, pay
attention to the distinction between the “duration of a second” vs “a frequency”. Becoming aware of
the distinction between the passage of time (traversing Onion-layers of time) vs. counting swings of a
pendulum or the vibrations of a quartz crystal or the precise oscillations of Cesium 133 – these clock rates
© John Wsol -9- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04
 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

are all subject to adjustments for the 3 types of Relativity. These will be explained with quantum clarity
when we get that far.

Today all our scientific perceptions are viewed from the perspective of what we consider to be the
duration of one-second. Consider F = ma, where acceleration is in units of kilogram meters per-second-
per-second. Generalize this as:

[mass]*([distance]/[time])/[time] = [mass]*[speed of light]/[PlanckTime].

What this equations is trying to tell us – for those who know how to pay attention – that every kilogram
of mass slows the flow rate of time by this tiny amount per second.

Later, once we fill in our equation matrix, we will see which physical quantities are fundamental causes
vs. which ones are constant because they are ratios between co-variant fundamental properties.

© John Wsol -10- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

2 Explaining things that many physicists take for granted

This document describes the specific geometries of 4D Space~Time wave functions and correlates these
wave constructs with well-known physics properties and the equations which precisely relate them. Thus,
explaining the meaning of each of the 11 most fundamental properties of the so called “Vacuum”.

2.1 Equation Matrix linking Newton, Einstein & Planck

This table ought to be in Chapter 1 of every physics book High School on up:
Space~Time / Mass~Charge Equation Matrix: factoring out Newtons reveals an invisible symmetry

Surface/Time = Time × c2 Einstein made “E=Mc2” famous. Max Planck

Inter- showed that energy exchange happens in
ℏ𝜔 = Energy = Mass × c2 discrete increments, h at a frequency rate
action
N(m) [kg] denoted by the Greek letter ν. c2 also relates
many other physical properties: KΘ i[ii] is the
G [N(m/kg)2] = KΘ [N(s/kg)2] × c2 author’s discovery that “s/kg” says how much
Matter /w

~Time
Space

6.67384x10-11 7.425648x10-28 each kilogram of matter slows time & curves

space , where “m/kg” is a radius of curvature
[m3/ kg s2] [m/kg] per kilogram; which in turn slows space
expansion around massive objects “m3/s2”
Ke [N(m/C)2] = Km [N(s/C)2] × c2 obeying the inverse-square law.
EM /w
Matter

8.9875518x109 1x10-7 For Electromagnetism, a Charge differential

[kg m3/s2/C2] [kg m/C2] along the time-dimension (north-to-south
magnetic poles) slows time “s/C” in a magnetic
field. For electric fields “m/C” says space is
1/ε0 = µ0 × c2
Propagation

curved by electric charge differential is space.

1/8.8541878x10-12 1.256637061x10-6
Wave

[m/F] [N/A2] For Electromagnetic waves, defines a

photon as an incremental packet of angular
In this table & whole document: momentum propagating at the speed of light.
A=Amperes, C=Coulombs, c=speed-of-light, h=Planck’s constant, ε0=electric permittivity, ν=ω=frequency, N=Newtons;
kg=kilograms, m=meters, s=seconds, F=Farads, N(s/C)2 is equivalent to N/A2, i= ; ж=

Dimensional units are enclosed in [Brackets]. Note this hidden symmetry revealed when factoring out
Newtons [N] which helps to conceptualize the meaning of these otherwise difficult to grasp dimensional
concepts. Every cell in this table deserves its own symbol. KΘ is my notation for this Constant not
commonly recognized for its profound significance in physics -- but any physics formula containing G/c2
reflects the same idea.

© John Wsol -11- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

2.2 Onion-Layers of Planck Time vs. the Fine Structure of the “Dielectric Field”
Fundamental charge, aka elementary charge, see eC below, manifests at a frequency is the reciprocal of the
Planck Time times square root of the Fine Structure constant.
#
Frequency of elementary charge = ω!" = = 1.584505421e42 (11)
$ℓ √&
Spatially, the arc-length of these quantum-scale oscillations is the Planck Length. Surprisingly, the oscillations
between layers is not 2π radians (360-degrees), but rather, 1-radian (about 57.3-degrees). The ratio of Planck
Length over Planck Time is c, the speed of light in Free Space. Two surprising realizations are: (1) the Planck
Charge represents 1-radian worth of rotation goes into each Cosmic Onion layer. (2) elementary charge
represents 11.7 radians of rotation of these layers. This is what creates the Dielectric Field.

Locally, these layers appear to be flat, but their curvature is the same as the circumference of the universe.
For a 13.8Billion year old universe this translates to about 4.038x10^60 Planck-times --

1-radian arc-length ℓ à ) ß is the Planck Length

(_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (

Reverse Time
) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
Forward Time

(_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (
) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
(_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (
) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _) _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _)
(_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (

Magnetic Force Constant, (ßà) Km, is the amplitude

Just like how EZ Water layers are offset, so are these rotational oscillations of adjacent Onion-layers of
Planck-time. Note that the solid lines at the nodal points remain
stationary. The dashed lines represent the point of maximum
amplitude. The amplitude of these oscillations is the magnetic
force constant (K_m) 1e-7 N/A2 . I’ll explain these units later, but
for now think of this numeric quantity 1e-7 as the scaling factor of
SI units for the amplitude of these oscillations. The circumference
h (ℏ) Km
of the outward rotation is 2πKm and the inward is (-2πKm).
µ0
𝝁𝟎 [𝑘𝑔 ⋅ 𝑚/𝐶 ( ] = 𝟒𝝅𝑲𝒎 = 𝟐𝝅𝑲𝒎 − (−𝟐𝝅𝑲𝒎 ) (6)

The 2nd Electro-Magnetic (EM) property of the Dielectric Field h, Planck’s constant, is full rotation
is the Magnetic Permeability of Space (µ0) which is created by the angular momentum. ℏ, reduced
differential of the inward (reverse time, -2πKm) versus outward Planck properly reflects 1-
(forward time, +2πKm) rotationally oscillating, standing waves. PlanckMass per one quantum of
Alternately, µ0 units can be written as [Henrys/meter]. Hypothesis: rotation, 1-radian. Wavicles manifest
ℏ $- % .
( (
𝒁𝟎 [𝑚 𝑘𝑔/𝑠 ⋅ 𝐶 ] = 𝝁𝟎 [𝑚 ⋅ 𝑘𝑔/𝐶 ] × 𝒄[𝑚/𝑠] ( (7) Mass = 𝜔" where 𝜔" =
%. ℏ
The Impedance of Free Space is 376.7303135 Ohms.

© John Wsol -12- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

Next, lets compress the vertical scale in the diagram to represent one seconds worth of time:

Top View PlanckMass = One seconds worth of these Planck Spherical Oscillators
Illustration needs --- (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(|)(\)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)à
two layers
ß(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(/)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)---
--- (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(|)(\)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)à

1 second
^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
1.85x1043 layers of Planck Time/second
v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v v
ß(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(/)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)---
--- (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(|)(\)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)à
ß(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|)(/)(|)(|)(|) (|)(|)(|)(|) (|)---
Planck’s Constant (h) = Angular momentum of each Planck Spherical Oscillator
(ℏ, hBar) = Reduced Angular momentum encountered while penetrating one
layer to the next. Note at this Planck scale “jitter motion” is unavoidable.

Connecting the diagrams above to the table below: The Planck Time is the time to transition from one layer to the
next. The Planck Length is the distance that light propagates in one Planck Time ℓ8 = 𝑐, the speed of light. Planck
𝑡ℓ
Mass is one-second worth of these Planck Spherical Oscillators – that is the volume encompassed by the amplitude
of the Onion layer oscillations. The Reduced Planck, ℏ, is the angular momentum encountered while penetrating
one-seconds worth of Onion layers. Planck’s non-constant is the total angular momentum of one-second worth of
Quantum Onion layers. KΘ is key – it says mass is proportional to length, while the speed of light is proportional
to time, so mass is proportional the duration of a second.

Physical Approximate SI units Speed of Light, c 29972458 m/s

Property, symbol Value KΘ = G/c2 7.425922242e-28 m/kg
Planck Freq, 𝜔ℓ 1. 8548596965e-43 radians/sec Newton’s, G 6.674086072e-11 kg m3/s2
Planck Time, 𝑡ℓ = 1&𝜔ℓ 5.391160e-44 s elementary charge, e 1.6021766208e-19 C
Planck Length, ℓ 1. 616254e-35 m Mag. Force, Km 1e-7 kg m/C2
Planck Mass, 𝑚ℓ 2. 17643559e-8 kg Mag. Permeability, µ0 4πKm kg m/C2
Planck’s constant, h 6. 62607015e-34 kg m2/s Coulomb Constant, Ke 8987551787.368 kg m3/s2 C2
Reduced Planck, ℏ 1. 05457182e-34 kg m2/s Space Impedance, Z0 376.73031346 kg m2/s C2
Planck Charge, 𝑞ℓ 1. 875546038e-18 C = A s Electric Permittivity, ε0 8.85418781762e-12 s2 C2/kg m3
0.0072973525664
Fine Structure, 𝛼
1/137.035999138
Km is the magnetic-amplitude of the dielectric property of the Onion-layer standing waves. The magnetic permeability,
as described on previous page, is the difference as these circularly oscillating standing waves pass through each other.
Ke, Coulomb constant is simply Km*c2 – its meaning is described in the next sub-section
...

This last page is a work-in-progress – needs to tie together ideas and wrap-up take-aways & suggest conclusions.

2.3 Fine Structure Constant – shows up in many places

Essential to all quantum mechanics is the need to grasp why the Fine Structure Constant and its value squared or
it’s square root connects many physics equations:

0.0072973525664 𝑒 ! 𝑍1 𝑒 ! 𝑒! 𝑟)
relative uncertainty=2.3e-10 𝛼=N P = = = S = 82𝑅∞ ℎ𝑐𝑚) (12)
= 1/137.035999138 𝑞ℓ 2ℎ 2ℎ𝑐𝜀1 𝑎1

© John Wsol -13- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

More needs to be said here as we tie in the significance of Rydberg Constant,…

3 Magnetic Dipole Moment

𝑞
𝜇= 𝐿 (13)
2𝑚
µ is magnetic dipole moment, q is charge (usually +e, -e), m is mass of the particle, L is angular momentum.
−𝑒
electron: 𝜇) = 𝑔 𝑆 (13)
2𝑚)
µe is the electrons magnetic dipole moment, -e is its negative elementary charge me is electron’s mass, g is a fudge
factor, S is its spin angular momentum.

4 Appendix A
Differences between mainstream science and this proposed Cosmological model

Old Paradigm Thinking Proposed Paradigm Thinking

Matter is made from “solid?” Matter is the manifestation of wavicles. Electron & proton wavicles, each,
particles which (somehow) have have a characteristic frequency that they manifest charge and another
wave-like properties. frequency that they manifest mass. By relating these two frequencies to the
properties of Free Space – we can calculate all other properties of the so
called “particles”. Neutrons seem to be a blend of positive & negative.
Gravity causes apples to fall, Wavicles incrementally manifest mass at its Compton frequency. Each time
planets to orbit and creates this happens -- time – for that particle – stops for 1 Planck-time – leaving a
“gravity wells”. The thinking is Planck sized dent in the Now Manifold. This dent spreads at the speed of
that gravity causes time to slow. light – merging with of other particles. The accumulative effect of many
atoms concentrated in a region of space result in space around the object to
slow Space~Time expansion – creating a dent in Space~Time Manifold.
Gravity is the result of the temporal slope of this manifold encountering the
Impedance of the Dielectric Field.
Time is linear and the duration As a natural progression of time – space expands – and with it the duration
of our “second” today is the of a second slowly grows. Today that growth rate is so slow it that time –
same back to the beginning of to us – appears linear.
time.
Work-in-Progress…

© John Wsol -14- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022

5 Appendix B
Calculations referenced in this book.

2020: 8.41235640428985e-16 m 3.4e-10

4𝑎* 𝛼
2021: 8.41235640424147e-16 m 4.0e-11 𝑟+ = 𝑚 (4)
+
relative uncertainty^ 𝑚,

16 calc 'm_p2018 m_p m_e2018 m_e m_p2018%m_e2018 m_p%m_e MpMe_2018'

┌───────────────┬────────────────────────┬───────┬─────────┬───┬───────┐
│Quantity │Value digit┬16 │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K│dt │SIunits│ Calculated: 2020-09-12
├───────────────┼────────────────────────┼───────┼─────────┼───┼───────┤
│m_p2018 │ 1.672621923690000e_27 │2.5e_10│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ CODATA 2018
│m_p │ 1.672621925515432e_27 │3.9e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ mass of proton
│m_e2018 │ 9.109383701500001e_31 │2.4e_10│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ CODATA 2018
│m_e │ 9.109383711491229e_31 │1.7e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │ calculated electron mass
│m_p2018%m_e2018│ 1.836152673440002e3 │3.5e_10│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ calc from CODATA2018
│m_p%m_e │ 1.836152673430000e3 │4.3e_11│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ calc using lowest relUnc
│MpMe_2018 │ 1.836152673430000e3 │4.9e_11│0 0 0 0 0│0 │ │ CODATA2018 proton/electron
└───────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────┴─────────┴───┴───────┘ mass ratio.

4 3
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎#+-,., 4𝜋𝑟+( 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒('#)*) 𝜋𝑟𝑝
𝜂+ = = 𝑅' = =3 (5,6)
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎/0123".%245%#6 𝜋𝑟ℓ( 𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒+,-.%/0'#)*) 4 𝜋𝑟3
3 ℓ
'eta_p' defQty '4p1*(r_p^2) % pi*r_P^2'
┌──────┬───────────────────┬───────┬─────────┬───────┬──────────────────────┐
│Symbol│Value │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K│SIunits│Formula │
├──────┼───────────────────┼───────┼─────────┼───────┼──────────────────────┤
│eta_p │4.33447032844776e40│6.5e_11│0 0 0 0 0│ │4p1*(r_p^2) % pi*r_P^2│
└──────┴───────────────────┴───────┴─────────┴───────┴──────────────────────┘
'R_pVol' defQty '4r3p1*(r_p^3) % 4r3p1*(r_P^3)'
┌──────┬───────────────────┬───────┬─────────┬───────┬─────────────────────────────┐
│Symbol│Value │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K│SIunits│Formula │
├──────┼───────────────────┼───────┼─────────┼───────┼─────────────────────────────┤
│R_pVol│1.12801289541659e60│9.8e_11│0 0 0 0 0│ │4r3p1*(r_p^3) % 4r3p1*(r_P^3)│
└──────┴───────────────────┴───────┴─────────┴───────┴─────────────────────────────┘
Calculated: 2020-09-12

Proton Surface / Proton Volume 𝜂+

𝑚+ = 2𝑚ℓ (7)
in flat Planck Areas / Planck Spheres 𝑅+

16 calc '2*m_P * (eta_p % R_pVol) m_p'

┌────────────────────────┬────────────────────────┬───────┬─────────┬───┬───────┐
│Quantity │Value digit┬16 │relUnc │L_T_M_C_K│dt │SIunits│
├────────────────────────┼────────────────────────┼───────┼─────────┼───┼───────┤
│2*m_P * (eta_p % R_pVol)│ 1.672621925515432e_27 │9.6e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │
│m_p │ 1.672621925515432e_27 │3.9e_11│0 0 1 0 0│1 │kg │
└────────────────────────┴────────────────────────┴───────┴─────────┴───┴───────┘

© John Wsol -15- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04

 4D Spherical Space~Time, Holographic Fractal-Memory Cosmos – by John Wsol 2014-2022
whats 'm_P'
┌───┬──┬────────────────┬─────┬───────────┐
│m_P│kg│LTMCK: 0 0 1 0 0│sum=1│Planck mass│
├───────────────────────┬───────┬─────────┴─────────────┐
│Values digit┬16 │relUnc │Formulae │
├───────────────────────┼───────┼───────────────────────┤
│ 2.176434000000000e_8 │ 9e_6│m_P2018 │
│ 2.176435594396617e_8 │6.5e_12│q_P * %:(K_m % K_Theta)│
│ 2.176435594396617e_8 │ 5e_12│%:(hBar*c % G) │
│ 2.176435594396617e_8 │ 6e_12│hBar % c*l_P │
│ 2.176435594396617e_8 │7.3e_12│2*K_m*h % Zo*l_P │
│ 2.176435594396617e_8 │1.1e_11│(K_m*q_P^2)%l_P │
└───────────────────────┴───────┴───────────────────────┘
┌───────┬────┬─────────────────┬─────┬─────────────────┐
│K_Theta│m/kg│LTMCK: 1 0 _1 0 0│sum=0│d(length)/d(mass)│
├───────────────────────┬──────┬──────────────────┬────┘
│Values digit┬16 │relUnc│Formulae │
├───────────────────────┼──────┼──────────────────┤
│ 7.426151727479190e_28 │6e_12 │(c^3)*(t_P^2)%hBar│
│ 7.426151727479188e_28 │8e_12 │G % c^2 │
│ 7.426151727479187e_28 │9e_12 │l_P % m_P │
└───────────────────────┴──────┴──────────────────┘

© John Wsol -16- Rev: 4b 2022-10-04