Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Florida International University
FIU Digital Commons
FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School
11-5-2021
Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Yanet Ruvalcaba
Florida International University, yruva001@fiu.edu
Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd
Part of the Developmental Psychology Commons
Recommended Citation
Ruvalcaba, Yanet, "Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women" (2021). FIU Electronic
Theses and Dissertations. 4885.
https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/4885
This work is brought to you for free and open access by the University Graduate School at FIU Digital Commons. It
has been accepted for inclusion in FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of FIU
Digital Commons. For more information, please contact dcc@fiu.edu.
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Miami, Florida
CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT LATINA WOMEN
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of
the requirements for the degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
in
PSYCHOLOGY
by
Yanet Ruvalcaba
2021
To: Dean Michael R. Heithaus
College of Arts, Sciences, & Education
This dissertation, written by Yanet Ruvalcaba, and entitled Cyber Dating Abuse Among
Emerging Adult Latina Women, having been approved in respect to style and intellectual
content, is referred to you for judgment.
We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved.
_______________________________________
Dionne P. Stephens
_______________________________________
Miguel Á. Cano
_______________________________________
Timothy Hayes
_______________________________________
Asia A. Eaton, Major Professor
Date of Defense: November 5, 2021
The dissertation of Yanet Ruvalcaba is approved.
_______________________________________
Dean Michael R. Heithaus
College of Arts, Sciences, & Education
_______________________________________
Andrés G. Gil
Vice President for Research and Economic Development
and Dean of the University Graduate School
Florida International University, 2021
ii
© Copyright 2021 by Yanet Ruvalcaba
All rights reserved.
iii
DEDICATION
For my beautiful mother, who has crossed worlds, and sacrificed so much so I could have
this incredible life.
DEDICATORIA
Para mi bella madre, quien ha cruzado mundos y se ha sacrificado tanto para que yo
pudiera tener esta vida increíble.
iv
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I would like to acknowledge and express my deepest gratitude to those who have
supported me in this academic journey culminating in the successful completion of this
dissertation. To my mentor and Dissertation Chair, Dr. Asia A. Eaton – without your
guidance, expertise, and dedication this dissertation would not have been possible. Thank
you for believing in me and nourishing me as a person, scholar, scientist for the last eight
years and at every stage of training. From the time I was an undergraduate research
assistant to when I became a doctoral candidate, you inspired me and scaffolded my
development through radical patience and mold-breaking example. Thank you for your
affection, confidence, and for instilling in me a passion for rigorous, practical, and
courageous science. I could not be more grateful to be your mentee and academic
descendant.
To Dr. Dionne P. Stephens, thank you for your longstanding guidance and
mentorship throughout the years. You nurtured my curiosity for qualitative methods and
deepened my understanding of scholarship as advocacy for marginalized populations.
Every scholar of color in the academy lucky enough to count on your mentorship has
known comfort in your embrace. Thank you for existing, persevering, and shaping me
into the scholar that I am.
To the other members of my Dissertation Committee, Dr. Miguel Ángel Cano and
Dr. Timothy Hayes, thank you for your unwavering support, guidance, and detailed
feedback. Your gracious commitment to refining my scholarship and expertise enriched
my dissertation and professional growth immeasurably.
viii
It is with enormous gratitude and a full heart that I close this chapter of my
professional journey. Thank you to each of you for supporting my growth as person,
scientist, and scholar.
I also want to thank my lovely husband, my precious friends, and my beloved
family.
viii
ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION
CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT LATINA WOMEN
by
Yanet Ruvalcaba
Florida International University, 2021
Miami, Florida
Professor Asia A. Eaton, Major Professor
This dissertation examines the experience of cyber dating abuse victimization
among Latina women in emerging adulthood. There is particular emphasis on
investigating the relationship between cyber dating abuse victimization and risk and
protective factors. Study one implemented a strength-based approach to investigating
culturally relevant factors against cyber dating abuse victimization. The relationship
between acculturation and familial social support varied based on the subtypes of abuse.
Specifically, the best fitting pathways in the structural equation model indicated that
Latinx cultural orientation was protective against sexual cyber dating abuse victimization,
and this relationship was mediated by family support.
Study two focused on examining the relationship between cyber dating abuse
victimization and later experience of mental health symptoms and overall wellbeing, as
well as polyvictimization. A longitudinal design was implemented with a three-month lag
to test these relationships among a sample of Latina emerging adults. Findings indicated
no relationship with these health outcomes. The existence of polyvictimization was
supported by this study. Cyber dating abuse victimization increased likelihood of later in-
person abuse. Findings highlight important considerations for violence prevention efforts.
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER PAGE
I. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................1
II.STUDY ONE: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT

LATINAS: THE ROLES OF ETHNIC IDENTITY, ACCULTURATION, AND
FAMILIAL SOCIAL SUPPORT .......................................................................................4
Abstract ................................................................................................................................4
Introduction ..........................................................................................................................5
Methods..............................................................................................................................23
Results ................................................................................................................................30
Discussion ..........................................................................................................................36
III. STUDY TWO: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT

LATINAS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CYBER DATING ABUSE, IN-
PERSON ABUSE, HEALTH BEHAVIORS, AND WELL-BEING ...............................44
Abstract ..............................................................................................................................44
Introduction ........................................................................................................................45
Methods..............................................................................................................................60
Results ................................................................................................................................69
Discussion ..........................................................................................................................74
REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................80
VITA ................................................................................................................................109
x
LIST OF TABLES
TABLES PAGE
Study 1 First Familial Nation of Origin .............................................................................24
Study 1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations .................................................................26
Study 1 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation

Model .................................................................................................................................33

Model.................................................................................................................................35
Study 2 First Familial Nation of Origin .............................................................................62
Study 2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations .................................................................63

Model .................................................................................................................................71
Percent of Cyber Dating Abuse Victims That Reported In-Person Victimization ............73
xi
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURES PAGE
1 Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 1..............................................22
2 Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 2..............................................60
xii
I. INTRODUCTION
Intimate partner violence (IPV), a term used to describe all forms of abuse within
intimate relationships (Wallace, 2015), is globally and nationally recognized as a major
public health concern primarily affecting women (CDC, 2018; WHO, 2017). There are
four categories of “traditional” or in-person IPV: physical violence, sexual violence,
stalking, and psychological aggression (Breiding et al., 2015). One type of IPV that has
gained increasing attention from the psychological scientific community is cyber dating
abuse (Brem & Shorey, 2019; Borrajo et al., 2015). Cyber dating abuse is a type of IPV
that emphasizes the role of technology-based communication platforms, such as texts and
social media, to inflict harm on a romantic partner (Watkins et al., 2018).
This emergent form of partner violence is unique in that the technological
component makes victims accessible at any time or location and enables the abuse to be
public via online social platforms, amplifying the humiliation of victims (Lu et al., 2018;
Zweig et al., 2014). Like in-person forms of non-physical partner abuse (e.g.,
psychological aggression), there is evidence that cyber dating abuse precedes
psychological violence that escalates to physical violence (Madlock & Westerman,
2011). In fact, a longitudinal analysis of cyber dating abuse perpetration finds that cyber
dating abuse at baseline positively predicted psychological and physical partner violence
three months later (Brem & Shorey, 2019). Thus, cyber dating abuse has implications for
traditional forms of IPV and their associated harms.
Prevalence rates of cyber dating abuse victimization among individuals in the
developmental stage of emerging adulthood (ages 18-29 years) are high. Seventy three
percent of adults in this developmental stage report cyber dating abuse victimization
1
(Marganski & Melander, 2018). This is substantially higher than national prevalence
rates of first IPV victimization experiences of adults in early emerging adulthood, with an
estimated 45% for women and 41% for men (Marganski & Melander, 2018; Smith et al.,
2018). Another important consideration is gender; more specifically, the differential
experiences of IPV victimization among men and women. Although men also experience
IPV victimization, a greater proportion of women report in-person IPV and cyber dating
abuse (Smith et al., 2018; Marganski & Fauth, 2013).
An important limitation in this field is that most studies on cyber dating abuse
among adults are composed of predominately White samples (Brem & Shorey, 2019;
Madlock & Westerman, 2011; Marganski & Melander, 2018). The exclusion of
racial/ethnic minorities in this research is problematic given that these populations are at
increased risk of IPV (Black et al., 2011; Eaton & Stephens, 2018; Reingle et al., 2014).
Moreover, the risk factors, protective factors, and consequences of cyber dating abuse in
ethnic minority populations may differ quantitatively and qualitatively from their White
counterparts.
Therefore, the aim of the subsequent papers is to examine the nature of cyber
dating abuse victimization among Latina emerging adults. The first paper investigates
Latinx culturally specific factors as protective against cyber dating abuse victimization,
specifically ethnic identity, acculturation, and familial social support. The second paper
in this series employs longitudinal methods to understand how cyber dating abuse
victimization relates to later mental health, alcohol use, sexual risk taking, and
polyvictimization. In conjunction, these studies will contribute to our understanding of
risk and protective factors associated with cyber dating abuse victimization, which will
2
contribute to violence prevention efforts for this growing marginalized group in the
Unites States.
3
II. STUDY ONE: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT LATINAS:
THE ROLES OF ETHNIC IDENTITY, ACCULTURATION, AND FAMILIAL SOCIAL
SUPPORT
Abstract
Cyber dating abuse is an emerging form of intimate partner violence (IPV) that
includes stalking, psychological, and sexual forms of victimization (Flach & Deslandes,
2017). Although 32% of Latinx emerging adults in the U.S. reported IPV victimization in
the past year (Grest et al., 2018), research on cyber dating abuse in this population is
lacking. The purpose of this strengths-based study was to examine culturally-specific
factors that protect against cyber dating abuse victimization in emerging adult Latinas.
Based on intersectionality theory and IPV research among Latinx populations (Cole,
2009; Umana-Taylor, 2004), we examined the protective potential of ethnic identity,
Latinx cultural orientation, and familial social support. All individuals in the sample self-
identified as Latina women between the ages of 18 – 29 (M = 22.03; SD = 2.63) and were
undergraduate students attending a large Hispanic-serving university. The best fitting
structural equation model had an adequate RMSEA fit = .048. Perceived family social
support was a mediating variable between Latinx cultural orientation and sexual cyber
dating abuse, though this effect was not found for psychological and stalking cyber dating
abuse. Surprisingly, ethnic identity commitment had an inverse relationship with
victimization. Results highlight the importance of understanding the dynamics of
culturally relevant protective factors among different types of dating victimization.
Keywords: Hispanic, Latina, IPV, family support, partner abuse
4
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a form of abuse that occurs within current or
former romantic relationships and includes a variety of tactics used to harm a partner
(Breiding et al., 2015). IPV is globally accepted as a major public health concern and a
form of gender-based violence (WHO, 2021), disproportionately affecting women.
Current estimates find that approximately one third of all women globally who reported
ever being in an intimate relationship were physically or sexually victimized by a partner
at least once in their lifetime (WHO, 2021). Domestic violence was the first form of IPV
systematically studied and addressed in Western society (Wallace, 2015), with the
movement towards criminalizing partner violence focusing specifically on heterosexual
domestic partnerships (Wallace, 2015). In the early 2000s, the phrase IPV became a
widely accepted umbrella term that includes all forms of romantic partner abuse,
including those in LGBT relationships and outside of marriage or domestic partnerships
(Wallace, 2015). The term “IPV” today covers all forms of intimate partner abuse,
including domestic violence and dating violence (Wallace, 2015).
The subtypes of IPV are as follows: physical violence, sexual violence, stalking,
and psychological aggression (Breiding et al., 2015). According to this characterization,
physical IPV is the use of physical force to harm another person. Sexual IPV is
characterized as the use of force to get a partner to engage in a sexual act without
consent. Stalking is a behavior characterized as a pattern of attention and contact that
compromises the perceived security of a person. Psychological aggression in IPV is the
use of verbal and nonverbal communication strategies to non-physically harm their
partner. Intimate partner relationships are categorized as current or former spouses,
5
boyfriends/ girlfriends, dating partners, and ongoing sexual partners (Breiding et al.,
2015).
In the U.S., the lifetime prevalence of sexual violence, physical violence, and/or
stalking victimization among women from an intimate partner is 36.4%, and 33.6% for
men (Smith et al., 2018). Although the prevalence rates of IPV for women and men are
similar, a greater percentage of women report significant IPV-related impact, with 1 in 4
women vs 1 in 10 men reporting experiencing concern for safety, need for medical care,
legal services, among many other (Smith et al., 2018). This is in part because women are
more often subject to sexual violence and severe physical violence than men (Smith et al.,
2018).
Technological advancements have shifted the platform, context, and tactics that
can be used to perpetrate intimate partner abuse. One form of technology-facilitated
intimate partner violence (IPV), cyber dating abuse, is when technology is used to
perpetrate abuse among dating partners (Flach & Deslandes, 2017). Research finds that
73% of emerging adults ages 18-25 years are victims of cyber dating abuse, which is
much higher in comparison to first sexual, physical, and/or stalking IPV victimization by
women and men ages 18-24 nationally (45.2% and 41.2%, respectively; Marganski &
Melander, 2018; Smith et al., 2018). Moreover, this increasingly prevalent form of abuse
has a host of negative correlates. For example, Lindsay and colleagues (2016) examined
intimate partner online harassment among emerging adults and found that it was
positively associated with depression and anxiety. Similarly, another study reported that
men and women expect to experience more distress from cyber dating abuse than
electronic victimization from a friend (Bennett et al., 2011).
6
Unfortunately, most studies examining cyber dating aggression within the United
States have used predominately White samples, inhibiting our understanding of this
phenomenon among racial/ethnic minorities (Bennett et al., 2011; Lindsay et al., 2016;
Marganski & Melander, 2018; Wolford-Clevenger et al., 2016). Although existing studies
provide insight into the relationship between cyber dating abuse and wellbeing, the lack
of focus on racial/ethnic samples is especially problematic because research suggests that
adolescents and young adults of color are the most vulnerable for IPV victimization
(Black et al., 2011; Eaton & Stephens, 2018). According to the National Intimate Partner
Violence Survey, the 12-month prevalence of sexual, physical, and/or stalking IPV
victimization by racial/ethnic background is 12.5% for multiracial, 9.4% for Black, 8.2%
for American Indian/ Alaska Native, 8.6% for Hispanic, and 5.7% for White (Smith et al.,
2017). In fact, when compared to Whites, Blacks and Latinx1 had a higher likelihood of
reporting IPV victimization, perpetration, or both (Reingle, Jennings, Connell, Businelle,
& Chartier, 2014).
Focusing on cyber dating abuse among Latina women, in particular, is crucial
given that the Latinx population is shifting national demographics (Flores, 2017). The
Latinx community currently represents approximately 18% of the population, making it
the second largest group in the US, and it is the second fastest growing racial/ethnic
group (Flores, 2017). Additionally, Latinx individuals report high rates of IPV (Black et
al., 2011; Flores, 2017; Forster et al., 2017; Nowotny et al., 2013). When compared to
1The term Latinx refers to individuals who self-identity with Latin American ancestry
(Salinas & Lozano, 2017).
7
White couples, Latinx couples have a greater likelihood for severe IPV recurrence
(Caetano et al., 2005). Also, in early young adulthood, the prevalence rates for minor
non-sexual IPV victimization was 24.1% among Latina women, 22.8% among Black
women, and 22.6% for White women (Nowotny et al., 2013). The same prevalence
pattern was present in major non-sexual IPV victimization with 15.8% for Latina women,
14.3% for Black women, and 11.9% for White women (Nowotny et al., 2013). A variety
of reasons for these disparities have been posited and examined with regard to in-person
dating violence, including the unique cultural factors that could mitigate or facilitate
experiences of dating violence (Caetano et al., 2000; Forster et al., 2017; Sabina et al.,
2016).
Culturally Relevant Predictors of Cyber Dating Abuse
Ethnic Identity
One factor relevant to the experience of IPV among young people from
marginalized racial-ethnic backgrounds is ethnic identity. Ethnic identity is a self-concept
and social identity that is acquired by one’s relationship with their ethnic group
membership (Phinney, 1992; Tajfel, 1981). In other words, it is the sense of identification
an individual has to their respective ethnic group (Phinney, 1992). Ethnic identity
acquisition is considered a developmental process since there is stability and instability in
an individual’s ethnic identity over time- especially during adolescence and emerging
adulthood (Phinney, 2007).
The two processes involved in ethnic identity formation are exploration and
commitment (Phiney & Ong, 2007) . Exploration consists of an individual’s
engagement in seeking knowledge and experiences within their self-identified ethnic
8
group (Phiney & Ong, 2007). For example, an individual’s self-exposure to cultural
events and practices is part of the exploration process (Forster et al., 2017), such as when
a Cuban American takes a guided tour of Little Havana District in Miami to learn more
about Cuban history and culture. The commitment component of ethnic identity refers to
an individual’s level of attachment, or sense of belonging, to their respective ethnic
group, which is also conceptualized as ethnic-identity affirmation (Phinney & Ong, 2007;
1992; Forster et al., 2017; Schwartz et al., 2010). For example, even if two individuals
are first generation Americans, one may feel a stronger belonging to their parents’ nation
of origin while another may not, showing different degrees of commitment. When
individuals engage in both exploration and commitment, this is indicative of ethnic
identity achievement, while a lack of exploration and achievement is ethnic identity
diffusion (Phinney, 1992).
Ethnic identity is an important cultural construct related to the wellbeing of
members of the Latinx community, which includes people of Latin American descent
(Ai et al., 2014; Williams et al., 2014). For example, ethnic identity has been identified as
a protective factor against substance use, physical and mental health, emotional
wellbeing, and discrimination for Latinx individuals (Ai et al., 2014; Chun et al., 2016;
Perreira et al., 2019; Umaña-Taylor & Updegraff, 2007). A national study using a diverse
Latinx sample, including Cubans, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, and others, found a direct
relationship between ethnic identity and self-rated mental health and physical health (Ai
et al., 2014). Specifically, ethnic identity was associated with an improvement in mental
and physical health. This finding is consistent with recent research on Latinx youth, in
which a positive ethnic identity was associated with better mental health and a decrease
9
in alcohol and smoking susceptibility (Perrieria et al., 2019). Ethnic identity served as a
source of resilience even with acculturation and acculturative stress explaining variance
in the model. Among Latinx emerging adults, ethnic identity has been found to protect
against hopelessness, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation (Cheref et al., 2019;
Polanco-Roman & Miranda, 2013).
Despite the growing evidence that ethnic identity serves a source of resilience, the
role of ethnic identity in partner abuse has been understudied, and the little evidence that
does exist is in conflict. One study, using a sample of Latina women, examined the
mediating role of cultural values (i.e. machismo, marianismo, and familism) on ethnic
identity and perceptions of IPV, and on acculturation and perceptions of IPV (Oxtoby,
2012). Perceptions of IPV were about the perceived causes for IPV, such as violation of
gender roles, behavioral responses, and seriousness of the IPV event. There was no effect
found to support machismo and marianismo as mediators for the relationship between
either of the two predictors (acculturation and ethnic identity) and the outcome variable
of perceptions of IPV due to violating gender roles. Additionally, cultural values,
acculturation level, and ethnic identity were found to not be significant predictors of
acceptability for male-perpetrated or female-perpetrated violence, or perceptions of
seriousness.
Another study reported a negative relationship between ethnic identity and
psychological aggression perpetration and victimization among Black youth in high
school, and males in middle school, but a positive relationship for females in high school
(Edwards, Green, & Perkins, 2006). This finding was supported by a study examining
discrimination, community violence, and IPV experiences among a sample of 80.4%
10
Black 13.8% Latina emerging adult women (Stueve & O’Donnell, 2008). There was no
association between ethnic identity and physical and emotional victimization and
perpetration.
On the other hand, ethnic identity sometimes exhibits protective effects with
regard to IPV and related outcomes (Eaton & Stephens, 2018). For example, it is related
to decreased odds of IPV victimization for Latina adolescents, but not Latinos (Sanderson
et al., 2004). Further, Forster and colleagues (2017) examined the relationship between
cultural identity development and partner abuse among Latinx emerging adults. They
found that ethnic identity affirmation, or sense of belonging to their ethnic group, was a
protective factor against IPV among men and women. Specifically, stronger ethnic
identity affirmation, or commitment, was associated with decreased odds of IPV
victimization and bidirectional IPV, which is conceptualized as individuals who reported
both perpetration and victimization in their relationships.
The conflicting evidence between ethnic identity and IPV present in the literature
could be potentially due to the differential ethnic/racial groups being examined or the
differences in IPV related outcomes. For example, Oxtoby (2012) examined causes of
IPV and seriousness while Forster et al., (2017) examined rates of IPV experience. Thus,
an aim of this study is to examine the relationship of ethnic identity and cyber dating
abuse victimization for Latina emerging adults. Specifically, to assess whether ethnic
identity affirmation and commitment serve as a protective factor against victimization,
consistent with Forster’s et al., (2017) study that examined IPV rates as the outcome.
Ethnic identity will be examined separately from acculturation given that it is distinctly
11
different since it is about self-concept and “subjective sense of belonging to a group or
culture” (Phinney et al., 2001 p.3). Therefore, the first prediction is as follows:
Hypothesis 1. Higher ethnic identity affirmation will be related to a decrease in
cyber dating abuse victimization (1a). Higher ethnic identity achievement will
also be related to decrease in cyber dating abuse victimization (1b).
Self-Esteem
Studies find that self-esteem, also referred to as “positive psychosocial
functioning,” is related to ethnic identity among Latinx samples (Wang et al., 2010, p.
2869). It is important to highlight that most studies examining the role of self-esteem and
ethnic identity among Latinx samples is focused on the developmental stage of
adolescence (Armenta & Hunt, 2009; Fisher et al., 2017; Hernandez et al., 2017;
Phinney, 1997, 2000; Romero & Roberts, 2003; Schwartz; Zamboanga et al., 2007;
Umaña-Taylor, 2004; Umaña-Taylor & Updegraff, 2007; Umana-Taylor et al., 2009).
Overall ethnic identity and different stages of ethnic identity, like search, commitment,
and affirmation, have been found to be correlated with self-esteem (Phinney, 2000;
Romero & Roberts, 2003; Umana-Taylor, 2004). Other studies have supported ethnic
identity as a predictor of higher self-esteem (Armenta & Hunt, 2009; Phinney et al.,
1997), or explored self-esteem as a potential mediator between ethnic identity and
behavioral and health outcomes (Fisher et al., 2017; Schwartz et al., 2007; Umaña -
Taylor & Updegraff, 2007).
For example, self-esteem has been found to mediate the effect of ethnic identity
on externalizing symptoms, academic grades, and depressive symptoms (Schwartz et al.,
2007; Umaña -Taylor & Updegraff, 2007), and partially mediate the relationship between
12
ethnic identity and substance use (Fisher et al., 2017). There is evidence to the contrary,
however, where ethnic identity was not supported as a predictor or self-esteem
longitudinally, or as a mediator between ethnic identity and proactive coping (Umaña-
Taylor et al., 2008). However, other research finds that across time ethnic pride predicts
self-esteem among boys (Hernandez et al., 2017), and that an increase in ethnic identity
exploration predicted an increase in self-esteem among adolescents (Umaña-Taylor et al.,
2009).
Research on the relationship between self-esteem and ethnic identity among adult
samples is limited. One study using a sample of young adult Cubans in Miami reported
that both Latinx orientation and ethnic identity were related to self-esteem, with pressure
to acculturate as the mediator between ethnic identity and self-esteem (Wang et al.,
2010). Another study, using a sample of young adult ethnic minority college students,
found that individuals with a positive ethnic identity and not involved in ego identity
search reported higher levels of self-esteem (Louis & Liem, 2005). It is important to
highlight that although the role of self-esteem and IPV among Latinx women has been
examined (Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2009; 2011; 2013), the relationship between self-
esteem and ethnic identity within the context of IPV has not been explored. The only
study to date that has examined ethnic identity affirmation as a predictor of in person
IPV, has suggested that self-esteem could be a potentially explanatory factor for higher
ethnic identify affirmation predicting lower levels of victimization (Forster et al., 2017).
Given the lack of IPV research among Latinx emerging adults and ethnic identity, self-
esteem will be explored as a mediator between ethnic identity affirmation and
achievement and victimization. The prediction is as follows:
13
Hypothesis 2: Self -esteem will mediate the relationship between the predictor
variables of ethnic identity affirmation (H2a) and achievement (H2b) with
outcome variable cyber dating abuse victimization.
Acculturation
Acculturation is the cultural change that occurs in a group of individuals when
they enter a cultural context different from their own (Doucerain et al., 2017). The model
of acculturation was initially conceptualized as a unidimensional process (Schwartz et al.,
2010). The individual encountering a different cultural context either (a) retained their
heritage culture or (b) adhered to the receiving culture along a continuum (Schwartz et
al., 2010). The multidimensional model of acculturation posits that there are multiple
strategies to navigate this process, including assimilation, separation, integration and
marginalization (Berry, 1997), and that biculturalism is possible. Assimilation is when
the heritage culture is replaced with the receiving culture. Separation is when the heritage
culture is maintained, and the receiving culture is rejected. Integration, also known as
biculturalism, is when both the heritage and receiving culture are maintained.
Marginalization is when both heritage and receiving cultures are rejected.
The role of acculturation in IPV victimization and perpetration among Latinx
samples has been examined in the past two decades (Jasinki, 1998; Grest et al., 2018).
Within this research, high acculturation is conceptualized as assimilation, where a highly
acculturated individual identifies more with the dominant culture (Caetano et al., 2000;
Caetano et al., 2004; Garcia et al., 2005; Harris et al., 2005; Jasinki, 1998; Smokowski et
al., 2009). Although there are studies that fail to find an association between acculturation
and IPV among Latinx samples (e.g. Cunradi, 2009; Grest et al., 2018; Beas, 2009;
14
Ramirez, 2007, Sabina et al., 2016), most have found a significant relationship (e.g.
Alvarez et al., 2018; Caetano et al., 2000b; Cuevas et al., 2010; Garcia et al., 2005; Grest
et al., 2018; Jasinki, 1998; Sabina et al., 2015; Sanderson et al., 2004). In particular,
greater acculturation, conceptualized as high assimilation, is associated with an increased
likelihood of IPV victimization and perpetration (Garcia et al., 2005; Jasinski, 1998;
Sabina et al., 2015). Among Latina women, a greater orientation towards Latinx culture
has been shown to be related to a decreased likelihood of IPV victimization (Sabina et al.,
2015).
This finding is consistent developmentally, where the likelihood of perpetration
and victimization in emerging adulthood decreased if participants reported higher Latinx
orientation (Grest et al., 2018). Further, higher Latinx orientation in adolescence was
associated with a lower likelihood of perpetrating physical IPV and seeking medical
attention because of victimization in emerging adulthood among men and women. The
only significant gender by acculturation interaction found that higher U.S. orientation
was associated with increased likelihood of perpetrating physical IPV in emerging
adulthood among boys only. Cumulatively, these studies provide evidence for Latinx
culture being protective (Alvarez et al., 2018; Garcia et al., 2005; Grest et al., 2017;
Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2012; Jasinski, 1998; Sabina et al., 2015). In the present study,
the multidimensional framework of acculturation will be used by assessing Latinx
cultural orientation and Anglo cultural orientation orthogonally. The degree of Anglo
cultural orientation affiliation within the acculturation process will be examined as an
explanatory variable, as such no specific prediction is present for Anglo cultural
orientation. Thus, the second prediction is as follows:
15
Hypothesis 3. Higher Latinx orientation will be related to lower rates of cyber
dating abuse victimization.
Familism
Familism, or familismo, is an important cultural value among the Latinx
population, which emphasizes “a strong orientation and commitment toward the family”
(Toro-Morn, 2012, p. 672). This cultural value is present pan-ethnically across Latino
subgroups (Calzada et al., 2012). There are attitudinal and behavioral aspects of familism.
The attitudinal component of familism includes familial support, familial
interconnectedness, familial honor, and subjection of self for family (Steidel &
Contreras., 2003). Familial support is the belief that support should be provided to family
members daily and in circumstances characterized with struggle. Familial
interconnectedness is the belief that the family unit should be geographically and
emotionally close. Familial honor is the belief that the role of the individual is to protect
and defend the family's reputation. Subjugation of self for family is the belief that there
should be submission and respect to the family unit. The behaviors that are guided and
supported by these beliefs are known as behavioral familism, which include instrumental
support, like financial help (Calzada et al., 2012), and social support provided by family
(Knight et al., 2010).
Within the IPV literature, different components of familism have been found to be
either detrimental or protective. Familial honor and subjugation of self for family are
aspects of familism that have been linked to low levels of IPV or sexual assault
victimization disclosure (Ahrens et al., 2010; Fuchsel, 2013). Latina women refrain from
disclosing their experience with IPV or sexual violence, in part, to protect the family
16
from shame and adhere to the cultural norm of hiding family secrets (Ahrens et al., 2010;
Fuchsel, 2013). Generally, they expect their family to support them in these experiences
of abuse (Fuchsel, 2013; Klevens et al., 2007); however, some studies find differential
experiences of familial support, where some women report supportive families and others
report unsupportive families (Fuchsel, 2013; Kasturirangan & Williams, 2003; Klevens et
al., 2007). Further, familism emphasizes the importance of togetherness, and in cases of
IPV it can be harmful for victims. Latinx IPV victims report that the belief of family
togetherness prevented them from leaving an abusive relationship (Vidales, 2010). On
the other hand, the value of familism also emphasizes motherhood, which would
encourage women to leave the relationship in order to protect the children (Acevedo,
2000; Alcalde, 2010). As presented in the previous studies, the evidence of how familism
is connected with IPV victimization is mixed in that different aspects of familism are
related to different IPV experiences.
Familism has been examined as a composite score that includes different
components of this value, like family support and subjugation of self. When a composite
score is used it can obscure the fact that these different components operate differently.
Among a sample of Latina emerging adults, familism was negatively associated with IPV
victimization related to injury tactics from a romantic partner (Camacho, 2009).
Endorsement of attitudinal familism predicted lower physical injury in the relationship. In
this case, however, analyses were based on the overall measure of familism, which
included familial support, interconnectedness, honor, and subjugation of self. Santis and
colleagues (2016) reported similar results, where higher endorsement of familism was
related to a decrease in IPV history and sexual risk taking. A total score of familism,
17
which included familial obligations, perceived family support, and family as referent, was
again used. However, Cuevas (2009) did not report a significant relationship between
attitudinal familism and IPV among Latina women.
It is important to emphasize that specific factors within familism are associated
with differential effects. For example, subjugation of self and family honor have been
shown to be harmful for victims of IPV, while familial social support has been shown to
be helpful. Cueves and colleagues (2015) reported results from a longitudinal study
consisting of two time points with a sample of Latinx youth. An increase in social support
at the final time point decreased the likelihood of victimization among non-victims and
victims at the initial time point. Social support included general perceived social support
and familial social support. There was also an effect of the number of children in
household, where the increase was associated with a decrease in revictimization. This
was postulated to be a proxy indicator of familial support. Similarly, Sabina and
colleagues (2016) analyzed the same data set and reported that among Latinx youth that
experienced dating violence across two time points, family social support decreased their
likelihood of abuse. Direct parent support is also protective against dating violence for
Latinx youth (Kast et al., 2016). Cumulatively these studies suggest that familial social
support is a protective Latinx cultural asset. It must be acknowledged, however, that
general social support, regardless of the source, could potentially be more important than
familial support (Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2011). Therefore, in the proposed model,
general social support will be controlled for when examining familial social support. The
third prediction is as follows
18
Hypothesis 4. Higher perceived familial support will be related to lower rates of
cyber dating abuse victimization, controlling for general social support.
Familial Social Support and Acculturation
The literature examining explanatory factors for the relationship between
acculturation and IPV is limited. To the author’s knowledge, there is one study that has
tested the role of an explanatory variable, i.e., acculturative stress, between acculturation
and IPV (Caetano et al., 2007). Studies that have found a relationship between
acculturation and IPV often lack a potential explanation as to how this happens (Cuevas
et al., 2010; Jasinski, 1998). Other studies suggest that specific cultural factors influence
this relationship like traditional gender roles, acculturative stress, and familism (Alvarez
et al., 2018; Garcia et al., 2005; Caetano et al., 2000; 2004; Grest et al., 2018; Sabina et
al., 2015; Sanderson et al., 2004), but they do not directly test these explanations. One
explanation is that it could be attributed to conflict that occurs due to the incongruence in
traditional gender roles between the man and woman in the relationship (Sanderson et al.,
2004), or the stress that occurs when partners have different levels of acculturation
(Caetano et al., 2000). Another explanation is that Latinx culture has a strong emphasis
on family, also known as familism. Family support is part of this cultural factor
(Rodriguez et al., 2007), which could potentially buffer the risk for victimization (Garcia
et al., 2005; Sabina et al., 2015; Sanderson et al., 2004).
One avenue that has yet to be explored is the role of familial social support, a
specific component of familism, as the explanatory variable between Latinx orientation
on the acculturation process and IPV victimization. IPV research using Latinx samples
has examined familism, or aspects of familism, and acculturation orthogonally, but not in
19
conjunction, e.g., in a mediational analysis. For example, in one study, familism and
acculturation were examined as predictors for the mediator of IPV attitudes, which then
predicted actual IPV victimization (Camacho, 2009). This model supported attitudes of
IPV as a mediator between acculturation and IPV victimization, and attitudes of IPV as a
partial mediator between familism and IPV victimization.
Similarly, other studies have examined the role of acculturation and familism,
among other variables, as separate predictors of IPV among Latinx adult and adolescent
samples (Beas, 2006; Sabina et al., 2016; Sabina & Cuevas, 2013), or family social
support as a control in the model (Garcia et al., 2005). Other research finds that more
acculturated women reported IPV victimization at higher rates, but no relationship of
attitudinal familism and IPV experience (Beas, 2009). Among Latinx youth, one study
found an effect of family support on dating violence experience, but no effect of
acculturation (Sabina et al., 2016). Another study found Latinx orientation on the
acculturation scale decreased the likelihood of dating violence, and attitudinal familism
increased the likelihood of formal help seeking, and social support, which included
familial, friends, and others, was also protective (Sabina & Cuevas, 2013).
Although scarce, the studies that have examined acculturation and familism as
IPV- related predictors provide correlational evidence about the relationship between
acculturation and overall familism score or the individual components of familism. The
overall familism score has been found to be positively associated with ethnic identity and
Latinx orientation (Oxtoby, 2012), and negatively associated with Anglo orientation
(Camacho, 2009; Oxtoby, 2012). Albeit exceptions exist (Camacho, 2009), a positive
relationship between family social support and Latinx orientation has been endorsed
20
(Beas, 2009). This relationship is also present across other areas of study related to health
and overall wellbeing. When compared to non-Latinx Whites, foreign and U.S. born
Latinxs report higher levels of perceived familial social support (Almeida, Molnar,
Kawachi, & Subramanian., 2009; Campos et al., 2008), and overall familism (Ramirez et
al., 2004; Steidal & Contreras, 2003). In fact, retention of origin culture, as measured by
language spoken at home, was also associated with greater perceived familial support for
those in predominately Spanish speaking households when compared to predominately
English-speaking households (Almeida et al., 2009).
There are studies which find that an increase in familial support was positively
related to American-culture orientation (Rodriguez & Kosloski; 1998), or no association
between level of acculturation and familial support (Steidal & Contreras, 2003).
However, the majority support familism, or specific components like familial support, to
be related to greater identification with heritage-culture (e.g. Curry et al., 2008). For
example, among a sample of emerging adults (57% Latinx, 18% non-Latinx Blacks, 16%
Whites, 7% Asians, and 2% mixed-ethnicity) American-culture orientation was not
associated with familism, but heritage culture orientation was.
Although this evidence supports the assumption that a closer affiliation with
Latinx culture is associated with a greater degree of familial social support, these two
variables have been examined as separate predictors to an IPV related outcome, as such a
mediational analysis has not been tested. This gap in the literature presents a unique
opportunity to contribute to the literature on Latinx cultural factors and IPV. An
additional aim of this study is to examine familism, specifically perceived family support,
21
as a potential explanatory factor for why Latinx culture is protective against IPV
victimization. The final prediction (also depicted in Figure 1) is as follows:
Hypothesis 5: Family social support will mediate the relationship between Latinx
orientation in the acculturation process and cyber dating aggression victimization.
Study Purpose
The purpose of this study is to examine the protective role of specific components
of Latinx culture and identity against cyber dating abuse victimization. The first aim is to
test the component of familism, perceived family social support, as an explanatory
pathway between Latinx culture is and victimization. An additional aim is to examine the
relationship between of ethnic identity affirmation and cyber dating abuse victimization.
This study contributes to the field of Latinx psychology by providing insight about the
relationship between unique cultural factors and cyber dating abuse victimization (see
Figure 1 for conceptual model).
22
Figure 1. Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 1
Methods
The study was conducted in a large Hispanic serving institution in the
southeastern United States. A virtual recruitment process was implemented with an
online recruitment flyer posted in a university platform, Sona Systems. This online
platform allows university researchers to recruit undergraduate students. Participants in
this study were compensated with course extra credit. The eligibility criteria to participate
in this study was for individuals to self-identify as woman, as part of the Latinx culture,
be in a romantic relationship at the time of recruitment and be between the ages of 18 –
29 years. Survey was linked to Sona System and online capabilities were supported by
Qualtrics.
Participant Demographics
The participant sample was homogenous in terms of age group, gender, and
ethnicity. All individuals in the sample self-identified as Latina women between the ages
of 18 – 29 (M = 22.03; SD = 2.63). Another pre-requisite for study participation was
being in a current romantic relationship. Most of the sample reported being in a romantic
relationship with a male dating partner at the time of survey completion (95.2%, n =
913/959), with the average relationship length being 22.54 months. The victimization
rates within the sample were 11.57% for sexual CDA (n = 110/951), 25.39% for
psychological CDA (n = 242/953), and 37.41% for stalking CDA (n = 355/949) within
the last six months. A total of 83.42% of participants self-identified as heterosexual (n =
800/959), 2.71% as lesbian (n = 26/959), 10.74% as bisexual (n = 103/959), 1.35% as
"other” (n = 13/959), and 1.78% prefer not to respond or did not respond (n = 17/959).
23
Most of the sample reported being 2nd generation immigrants (42.44%, n = 407/959),
followed by 1st generation status (38.48%, n = 369/959), 2.5th generation status
(10.53%, n = 101/959), 3rd generation status (5.94%, n = 57/959), 4th generation status
(2.19%, n = 21/959), 5th generation (0.31%, n = 3/959), with three non-responses. The
highest reported familial nation of origin was Cuba (46.19%, n = 443/959; see Table 1.
The descriptive statistics for the endogenous and exogenous variables along with their
respective correlations are in Table 2.
Table 1
Study 1 First Familial Nation of Origin
First Familial Nation of Origin N %

Afghanistan 1 0.1%
USA 24 2.5%
USA/Colombia 1 0.1%
USA/Cuba 1 0.1%
Argentina 14 1.5%
Belize 2 0.2%
Bolivia 4 0.4%
Brazil 9 0.9%
Chile 13 1.4%
Colombia 81 8.5%
Costa Rica 2 0.2%
Cuba 443 46.6%
Cuba/USA 1 0.4%
Cuba/Peru 2 0.2%
Dominican Republic 47 4.9%
Dominican Republic/USA 1 0.1%
Dominican Republic/Haiti 1 0.1%
Ecuador 14 1.5%
Egypt 1 0.1%
Eritrean 1 0.1%
France/Cuba 1 0.1%
Guatemala 8 0.8%
Honduras 34 3.6%
Ireland 1 0.1%
Israel/Spain 1 0.1%
Italia 4 0.4%
Jamaica 3 0.3%
Jamaica/Dominican Republic 1 0.2%
Lebanon 1 0.2%
24
Mexico 31 3.3%
Mexico/Cuba 1 0.1%
Nicaragua 40 4.2%
Pakistan 1 0.1%
Panama 5 0.5%
Peru 40 4.2%
Puerto Rico 42 4.4%
Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic 1 0.1%
Romania 1 0.1%
Salvador 1 0.2%
Spain 7 0.7%
Spain/Nicaragua 1 0.1%
Uruguay 1 0.1%
Venezuela 56 5.9%
25
Table 2
Study 1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations
Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Age 22.03 2.63
2. Ethnic
Identity 4.07 0.73 -.02
Achievement
[-.08, .05]
3. Family 5.71 1.44 .08* .19**

Support
[.01, .14] [.13, .25]
4. Friend 5.94 1.28 .01 .16** .37**

Support
[-.05, .08] [.10, .23] [.32, .43]
5. LOS 3.99 0.65 -.02 .41** .24** .16**

[-.09, .04] [.36, .47] [.18, .30] [.09, .22]
6.
Psychological 0.37 0.78 .03 .05 -.07* -.10** -.04
CDA
[-.13, - [-.16, - [-.11, .02]
[-.03, .10] [-.02, .11] .00] .04]
7. Self Esteem 22.87 6.14 -.09** -.08* -.07* -.06 -.02 .01
[-.16, - [-.14, - [-.14, - [-.13, .00] [-.09, .04] [-.05, .07]
.03] .02] .01]
8. Sexual CDA 0.19 0.63 -.07* -.01 -.12** -.07* -.04 .36** .02
[-.13, - [-.08, .05] [-.18, - [-.13, - [-.10, .03] [.31, .42] [-.05, .08]
.00] .05] .00]
9. Stalking 0.98 1.69 .02 .06 -.05 -.09** -.04 .56** -.02 .35**
CDA
26
[-.16, - [-.10, .03]
[-.05, .08] [-.01, .12] [-.11, .02] [.52, .60] [-.08, .05] [.29, .40]
.03]
Note. M and SD are used to represent mean and standard deviation, respectively. Values in square brackets indicate the 95% confidence
interval for each correlation. * indicates p < .05. ** indicates p < .01
27
Measures
After affirming consent, participants reported their demographic information,
followed by questions about their current romantic relationship experiences. Participants
were also asked to answer a series of questions related to self-esteem, ethnic identity,
acculturation, and social support. An attention check in the form of a question was
incorporated to help reduce bias due to unreliable answers. The end of the survey
included a page with resources at the local and national level related to intimate partner
violence.
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II (ARMSA-II). The
ARMSA-II measures the acculturation process (Cuéllar et al., 1995). This 30-item
measure originally was intended to measure Mexican cultural orientation but has been
adapted across other Latinx nationalities (Dennis et al., 2016; Kazak et al., 2018). The
scale was modified by replacing mention of Mexico to “my nation of origin [e.g.,
Mexico, El Salvador, etc.,]” (Dennis et al., 2016) and changing “Mexican” to
“Latino/Hispanic” (Kazak et al., 2018). There are two subscales within this measure, the
17 item Mexican orientation subscale (e.g., “My family cooks Latino/Hispanic foods”)
and the13 item Anglo orientation subscale (e.g., “I enjoy listening to English language
music”). All items were answered five-point Likert scale from not at all (0) to extremely
often or almost always (5). The Mexican orientation subscale was adapted to be the
Latinx cultural orientation subscale (Cuéllar et al., 1995; Dennis et al., 2016). These
subscales were intended to capture affiliation with cultural of origin and majority culture.
The ARMSA-II had a reliability of Cronbach’s α = .84 in this study.
28
Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale. The Cyber Aggression in
Relationships scale captured digital dating abuse victimization within the last 6 months
(Watkins et al., 2018). Response options for each question were on a 7-point Likert scale
from (0) this has never happened to (6) more than 20 times in the past 6 months, and (7)
not in the past 6 months, but it did happen before (7). As recommended by Watkins and
colleagues (2018) items were combined and transformed to represent degree of cyber
dating abuse endorsement, i.e., continuous variable of cyber dating abuse victimization.
This 17-item measure is composed of three subtypes of abuse: psychological, stalking,
and sexual. Two items were aggregated into the sexual cyber dating abuse subscale (1)
“Has your romantic partner ever threatened to share a sexually-explicit image or video of
you without your consent?” (2) “Has your romantic partner ever threatened to share a
sexually-explicit image or video of you without your consent?”. These items capture
additional forms of digital sexual abuse supported by empirical evidence (Eaton et al.,
2020; Eaton et al., 2017; Ruvalcaba & Eaton, 2020). The unidimensional measure of
cyber dating abuse had an adequate reliability at Cronbach’s α = 0.84. The corresponding
Cronbach’s α for the psychological, sexual, and stalking cyber dating abuse subscales
were 0.60, 0.66, 0.81.
Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure – Revised (MEIM-R). The MEIM-R is a 6-
item scale that measures the process of ethnic identity by identifying the degree to which
is the individual is in the exploration, commitment, or achievement (Phiney & Ong,
2007). Questions were answered in agreement or not from strongly agree (1) to strongly
disagree (5). This measure is composed of two subscales, the exploration subscale and
commitment subscale. The commitment subscale was included as part of the analysis and
29
produced an adequate reliability of .89. An example item is “I have a strong sense of
belonging to my own ethnic group” (Phinney & Ong, 2007).
Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. The Multidimensional
Scale of Perceived Social Support measured perceived social support from family,
friends, and significant other (Zimet, Dahlem, Zimet, & Farley, 1988). This scale has
been administered to Latinx samples (Diaz & Bui, 2017). It contained three subscales
composed of 4-items with Likert scale type answer choices from very strongly disagree
(1) to very strongly agree (7). In line with aims of the study, the Family subscale was
included as part of the analytical model, which had reliability of Cronbach’s α = .93. An
example item of the Family subscale is “I can talk about my problems with my family”
(Zimet et al., 1988).
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale is a ten-
item measure that assess self-esteem (Rosenberg, 1979). Participants rated their level of
agreement on the statements using a Likert scale ranging from strongly agree (1) to
strongly disagree (4). An example item is “I feel that I am a person of worth, at least on
an equal basis with others”. The scale has an adequate reliability of Cronbach’s α = .91
and has been previously used within a sample of Latinx emerging adults (Cano et al.,
2016).
Results
Power
An a priori power analysis was conducted with the R package semPower, using α
= .05 and power level at .80. A minimum sample size of 819 was required to detect a
30
misfit of .04 (Moshagen, 2018). The total sample size of 959 was large enough to detect
effects.
Analytic strategy.
In the hypothesized model, family support was expected to partially account for
the effect of LOS on the three types of CDA: psychological CDA, stalking CDA, and
sexual CDA. Another path included in the model was self-esteem as the mediator
between ethnic identity commitment and the three CDA typologies.
Structural equation modeling analysis (SEM) was executed with R software in the
Lavaan package (Rosseel, 2012). Nonnormality was examined within the data, and after
conducting a series of test with psych package, data nonnormality was confirmed
(Revelle, 2004). Maximum likelihood estimation with bootstrapping was used as a robust
method of estimation for standard errors and as a test of indirect effects with 1000
bootstrap samples (Preacher & Hayes, 2008). Instead of incorporating traditional deletion
methods to missing data, full information maximum likelihood was included within the
model specificities in the Lavaan package (Rosseel, 2012; Kline, 2010). Additionally, the
chi square test of model fit was examined, but with caution given the influence of a large
sample size on statistical significance (Yuan & Bentler, 2000). Additional fit statistics
were examined to determine the overall fit of the model to the data: root-mean-square
error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR),
Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI). The thresholds for
cutoff points were RMSEA< .08, SRMR < .08, TFI > .95, CFI > .95 to determine
acceptable model fit (Hoyle, 2012; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline, 2015).
31
Structural Model
SEM with ML estimation was used to test the hypothesized model. Global fit
statistics indicated adequate model fit, RMSEA = .048 with 90% confidence intervals
inside acceptable parameters (.036 < RMSEA CL90 < .061), SRMR = .037, CFI = .977,
TLI = .930. Modification indices were then explored. The data driven modification
indices did not support theoretically driven paths, therefore the model was retained.
Model Effects
Sexual CDA Victimization. The parameter estimates produced by the hypothesized
model are presented in Table 3. There were statistically significant direct pathways
between Latinx cultural orientation and familial support, b = 0.421, SE = 0.067, p < .001,
95% CI [0.291, 0.550] and between ethnic identity commitment and self-esteem, b = -
0.686, SE = 0.289, p = 0.021, 95% CI [-1.243, -0.090]. There was also a direct pathway
between family support and sexual CDA victimization, b = -0.041, SE = 0.016, p =
0.008, 95% CI [-0.073, -0.011]. A one-unit increase in familial support produced a 0.041-
unit increase in sexual CDA victimization. As expected, the indirect effect of Latinx
cultural orientation on sexual CDA through family support was statistically significant, b
= -0.017, SE = 0.007, p = 0.015 95% CI [-0.032, -0.005]. A one-unit change in Latinx
cultural orientation predicted a 0.017 decrease in sexual CDA because of family support
increasing by 0.421 units. All other tested indirect effects were non-significant.
Stalking and Psychological CDA Victimization. There was a different pattern of
effects for stalking CDA and psych CDA. Friend support was the only exogenous
variable with a direct effect onto stalking CDA, b = -0.121, SE = 0.047, p = 0.011, 95%
CI (-0.212, -0.027). For psychological CDA, there was a direct path from friend support,
32
to psychological CDA, b = -0.056, SE = 0.022, p = 0.013, 95% CI [-0.101, -0.013].
Contrary to expectation, a different pattern between ethnic identity commitment and
psych CDA was observed. There was a positive and statistically significant relationship
between ethnic identity commitment and psych CDA, b = 0.113, SE = 0.056, p = 0.042,
95% CI [-0.005, 0.223]. All other paths were nonsignificant.
Table 3
Study 1 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation Model
Path Lowe Upper.

Predictor DV SE sig p
Values r.CI CI
Direct Effect
Family Support LOS 0.42 0.07 * 0.00 0.29 0.55
Self Esteem EI Commitment 0.69 0.30 * 0.02 -1.24 -0.09
Age Psych CDA 0.01 0.01 0.39 -0.01 0.03
Income Psych CDA 0.01 0.02 0.36 -0.02 0.05
Generation Psych CDA -0.02 0.03 0.37 -0.08 0.02
LOS Psych CDA -0.09 0.05 0.05 -0.19 0.00
EI Commitment Psych CDA 0.11 0.06 * 0.04 -0.01 0.22
EI Exploration Psych CDA -0.03 0.04 0.53 -0.11 0.05
Family Support Psych CDA -0.03 0.02 0.22 -0.07 0.02
Friend Support Psych CDA -0.06 0.02 * 0.01 -0.10 -0.01
Self Esteem Psych CDA 0.00 0.00 0.65 -0.01 0.01
Age Stalking CDA 0.01 0.02 0.55 -0.03 0.06
Income Stalking CDA 0.01 0.04 0.84 -0.06 0.08
Generation Stalking CDA 0.03 0.06 0.59 -0.09 0.16
LOS Stalking CDA -0.02 0.11 0.29 -0.34 0.11
EI Commitment Stalking CDA 0.10 0.13 0.43 -0.16 0.37
EI Exploration Stalking CDA 0.10 0.10 0.31 -0.10 0.29
Family Support Stalking CDA -0.03 0.04 0.51 -0.10 0.05
Friend Support Stalking CDA -0.12 0.05 * 0.01 -0.21 -0.03
Self Esteem Stalking CDA -0.00 0.00 0.56 -0.02 0.01
Age Sexual CDA -0.01 0.01 0.05 -0.03 0.00
Income Sexual CDA 0.00 0.01 0.87 -0.02 0.03
Generation Sexual CDA -0.04 0.02 0.05 -0.09 0.00
LOS Sexual CDA -0.04 0.05 0.41 -0.13 0.05
EI Commitment Sexual CDA -0.03 0.05 0.48 -0.14 0.05
EI Exploration Sexual CDA 0.04 0.04 0.33 -0.04 0.12
Family Support Sexual CDA -0.04 0.02 * 0.01 -0.07 0.01
Indirect Effect of
Family Support
LOS Psych CDA -0.01 0.01 0.24 -0.03 0.01
33
LOS Stalking CDA -0.01 0.02 0.53 -0.04 0.02
LOS Sexual CDA -0.02 0.00 * 0.02 -0.03 -0.01
Indirect Effect of Self
Esteem
EI Commitment Psych CDA 0.00 0.00 0.68 -0.01 0.00
EI Commitment Sexual CDA 0.00 0.00 0.86 0.00 0.00
Exploratory Analysis
The unexpected positive association between psychological CDA and ethnic
identity commitment was further explored. One reason ethnic identity might be positively
related to psychological CDA may have to do with the effect of Latinx gender role
endorsement. Literature and theory suggest that culturally specific gender role beliefs are
risk factors for victimization for intimate partner violence among Latinx populations
(Faria, 2021, Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2013). Research further suggests that those high in
Latinx ethnic identity can show greater support for these culturally specific gender roles
(Sanchez et al., 2019). Therefore, correlations between negative gender role beliefs, i.e.,
negative marianismo and traditional machismo, and psychological CDA were examined.
Marianismo and psychological CDA were positively correlated, r(902) = .13, p > .001. A
similar pattern was present for traditional machismo and psychological CDA, r(902) =
.62, p > .001. Thereafter, the hypothesized model was revised to incorporate traditional
machismo, marianismo, and caballerismo as meditators between ethnic identity
commitment and psychological CDA (see Table 4). Marianismo and traditional
machismo were included in the model as mediators between ethnic identity commitment
and psychology cyber dating abuse. The direct pathways between these two variables on
psychological cyber dating abuse were also incorporated. The revised model global fit
statistics indicated good model fit, RMSEA = .046 with 90% confidence intervals inside
34
acceptable parameters (.037 < RMSEA CL90 < .055), SRMR = .042, CFI = .97, TLI =
.92.
There were no mediating effects of traditional machismo and negative
marianismo between ethnic identity commitment and psychological CDA. However, the
direct effect of ethnic identity commitment on psychological cyber dating abuse was
below the threshold for significance when traditional machismo and negative marianismo
were included in the model. Although a direct effect between traditional machismo and
psychological CDA was not present, there was a statistically significant direct effect
between marianismo and psychological CDA, b = 0.132, SE = 0.057, p = 0.022, 95% CI
[0.020, 0.245]. In other words, there was a positive relationship between marianismo and
psychological CDA, as such marianismo served as a risk factor for this form of abuse.
Table 4
Study 1 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Exploratory Structural Equation Model
Path Lower Upper

Predictor DV SE sig p
Values .CI .CI
Direct Effect
Family Support LOS 0.44 0.07 * 0.00 0.32 0.57
Self Esteem EI Commitment -0.69 0.30 * 0.02 -1.26 -0.09
Age Psych CDA 0.01 0.01 0.48 -0.01 0.03
Income Psych CDA 0.02 0.02 0.30 -0.01 0.05
Generation Psych CDA -0.03 0.03 0.35 -0.08 0.02
LOS Psych CDA -0.08 0.05 0.07 -0.18 0.01
EI Exploration Psych CDA -0.03 0.04 0.51 -0.11 0.06
Family Support Psych CDA -0.03 0.02 0.14 -0.07 0.01
Friend Support Psych CDA -0.06 0.02 * 0.01 -0.1 0.01
Self Esteem Psych CDA 0.00 0.00 0.69 -0.01 0.01
Marianismo Psych CDA 0.13 0.06 * 0.02 0.02 0.25
Traditional Machismo Psych CDA -0.03 0.03 0.27 -0.09 0.03
Caballerismo Psych CDA 0.00 0.02 0.94 -0.03 0.04
Age Stalking CDA 0.01 0.02 0.55 -0.03 0.06
Income Stalking CDA 0.01 0.04 0.85 -0.06 0.08
Generation Stalking CDA 0.04 0.06 0.59 -0.09 0.16
35
LOS Stalking CDA -0.12 0.11 0.30 -0.34 0.11
EI Exploration Stalking CDA 0.10 0.10 0.31 -0.10 0.29
Family Support Stalking CDA -0.02 0.04 0.55 -0.10 0.06
Friend Support Stalking CDA -0.12 0.05 * 0.01 -0.21 -0.03
Self Esteem Stalking CDA 0.00 0.01 0.56 -0.02 0.01
Age Sexual CDA -0.01 0.01 0.05 -0.03 0.00
Income Sexual CDA 0.00 0.01 0.87 -0.02 0.03
Generation Sexual CDA -0.04 0.02 0.05 -0.09 0.00
LOS Sexual CDA -0.04 0.05 0.43 -0.13 0.05
EI Commitment Sexual CDA -0.04 0.05 0.47 -0.14 0.05
EI Exploration Sexual CDA 0.04 0.04 0.33 -0.04 0.12
Family Support Sexual CDA -0.04 0.02 * 0.01 -0.07 -0.01
Indirect Effect of
Family Support
LOS Psych CDA -0.01 0.01 0.15 -0.03 0.01
LOS Stalking CDA -0.01 0.02 0.56 -0.04 0.03
LOS Sexual CDA -0.02 0.01 * 0.01 -0.03 0.01
Indirect Effect of Self
Esteem
EI Commitment Psych CDA 0.00 0.00 0.72 0.00 0.00
EI Commitment Sexual CDA 0.00 0.00 0.87 0.00 0.00
Indirect Effect of
Marianismo
Indirect Effect of
Traditional Machismo
Indirect Effect of
Caballerismo
Discussion
This study provides insight into the relationship between cyber dating abuse and
protective factors among Latina emerging adults in the U.S. This research contributes to
the literature by examining a population with a disproportionately high experience of
IPV, but scarce literature on their experiences with cyber dating abuse (Cano-Gonzalez et
al., 2020; Reed et al., 2020). In addition, we contribute to the literature on cyber dating
abuse by examining it as multidimensional construct (Ali et al., 2016; Brown et al., 2021;
36
Mennicke, 2019). Most research on cyber dating abuse has examined this form of
violence as unidimensional, despite various measures of cyber dating abuse confirming
the existence of multiple constructs both statistically and qualitatively (Borrajo et al.,
2015; Brown & Hegarty, 2018; Caridad et al., 2019; Lu et al., 2018). Finally, we
contribute to theory on culture and IPV by examining culturally-relevant protective
factors from a strengths-based perspective. We find significant links between culturally-
relevant protective factors and the different dimensions of cyber dating abuse.
Among victims of sexual cyber dating abuse, Latinx cultural orientation was
found to serve as a protective factor. This finding is consistent with previous research on
acculturation and IPV among Latinx populations. Specifically, higher affiliation to Latinx
cultural orientation has been associated with lower levels of IPV experience (Sabina et
al., 2015; Zavala, 2020). Scholars have consistently hypothesized Latinx cultural
orientation as protective against IPV, in part, due to familism since this cultural value
emphasizes the importance of family support (Sabina et al., 2015). Yet no research we
could find tested this prediction. This study additionally provides empirical support for
family support as an explanatory variable between Latinx cultural orientation and cyber
dating abuse victimization for sexual cyber dating abuse.
One potential reason why family support was protective against sexual cyber
dating abuse, and not psychological and stalking abuse, could be that this form of abuse
is uniquely situated as both sexual violence and IPV (Wright et al., 2021). The sexualized
nature of violence brings in unique disclosure barriers and experiences specific to sexual
violence (Wright et al., 2021). For example, there perceived social stigma and shame
among women who experience sexual violence (Wright et al., 2021). Also, among
37
Latina women there are specific cultural considerations (Faria, 2021), where matters of
sexuality are not openly discussed (Villarreal, 2020), in addition, to there being a strong
familial orientation (Faria, 2021). This informs the duality of family involvement post
sexual violence victimization. Some studies among Latina victims of both sexual and
intimate partner violence have identified family as a barrier to disclosure, due to privacy
of personal issues and protecting the family unit from shame (Christensen et al., 2021;
Lewis et al., 2005). Yet other studies among Latina women have found more a positive
outlook in the role of families for sexual violence survivors (e.g., Villarreal 2020). The
key differentiation is the reaction received from their families and the degree of support
victims perceived post disclosure (Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2016; Ligiéro et al., 2009). In
fact, among Latina sexual violence victims, family support weighs more heavily given
that it is more common among Latinas to disclose sexual violence victimization to their
kin network rather than friends or formal supports (Cuevas et al., 2014; Ligiéro et al.,
2009; Villareal, 2020; Yoshioka et al., 2003).
Thus, the effects of social support systems may be different for sexual vs.
nonsexual forms of abuse for Latina women. This is further substantiated by findings
indicating that friend unlike family support was protective for nonsexual forms of
cyberdating abuse (i.e., psychological and stalking cyber dating abuse). Therefore, the
effect of friends and family supports both appear to differ by the characterization of
abuse. Although there is substantial research supporting friends and family as important
social supports for IPV survivors (for review see Sylaska & Edwards, 2014), this is one
of the few studies that distinguishes between sources of social support and different
forms of partner abuse (Yoshioka et al., 2003). Additional research is warranted to more
38
deeply understand the meanings and reasons for differential effects of social system
supports on different forms of IPV among Latina women.
In terms of ethnic identity as a predictive factor, literature among Latinx
populations has supported ethnic identity as promoting well-being and protecting against
negative mental health, risky taking attitudes, and health compromising behaviors
(Perreira et al., 2020; Serrano-Villar & Calzada, 2016; risky attitudes, Forster et al.,
2019). The substantial research on the positive effects of ethnic identity among Latinx
adolescents and adults gained the attention of IPV researchers (Eaton & Stephens, 2018;
Forster et al., 2017; Sanderson et al., 2004). In light of the fact that ethnic identity has
been found to be protective against dating violence (Forster et al., 2017), the results from
this study were unexpected. Specifically, we found a positive association between ethnic
identity and psychological cyber dating abuse.
One potential explanation for this effect is the connection between ethnic identity
and culturally-specific gender role norms (Scott, 2017). Ethnic identity socialization and
development occurs in conjunction with and relative to other forms of socialization, like
gender role socialization (Umaña-Taylor et al., 2013; Acevedo-Polakovich et al., 2014;
Martinez et al., 2012). Gender role socialization within the context of culture also informs
identity development (Castillo et al., 2010; Miville et al., 2016). In Latinx culture,
marianismo represents one of the primary elements of the female gender role (Faria 2021,
Morales & Pérez, 2020). Because these culturally-specific beliefs are socialized in
conjunction with ethnic identity, and because marianismo may increase the risk of IPV
(Gonazez-Guarda et al., 2013; Terrazas-Carrollo & Sabina, 2019), we examined
marianismo as a mediator of the relationship between ethnic identity commitment and
39
psychological cyber dating abuse, as well as the direct pathway between marianismo and
psychological cyber dating abuse. As expected, endorsement of negative marianismo
beliefs statistically accounted for the positive relationship between psychological cyber
dating abuse and ethnic identity commitment. Although research has examined ethnic
identity and gender role beliefs among Latinas, the topic of “gendered ethnic identity” is
understudied (Scott, 2017 p. 53), a comprehensive and dynamic understanding of
identities and behavioral outcomes among Latinas is warranted.
Limitations
The empirical contributions of this study must be considered within a number of
limitations. First, the associations between protective factors and cyber dating abuse
typologies cannot be extended to perpetration experiences given the etiological and
characterological differences between them (Ali et al., 2016, Carlson & Jones, 2010;
Dixon & Graham-Kevan, 2011). Additionally, violence in this study was examined from
a victim only perspective, with abuse being conceptualized as one directional, from
perpetrator to victim. Therefore, the influence of bidirectional violence and context was
not captured in this study. A systematic review of IPV typologies recommends that
unidirectional violence and bidirectional violence experiences should be understood
separately (Mennicke, 2019). Other limitations pertain to the design of the study. The
effects captured from a cross sectional design are stagnant and represent a snapshot in
time of culturally-relevant construct that have been theorized and documented to be fluid
(Acevedo-Polakovich et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2020; Shadish et al., 2001; Steiner et al.,
2009; Wang & Cheng, 2020). Thus, while the directionality of pathways between
40
protective factors was theoretically supported, causality cannot be assumed (Shadish et
al., 2001).
Future Directions
Given the findings of this study, we make a few recommendations for future
studies. Researchers that intend to test the role of known risk and protective factors of in-
person IPV should examine cyber dating abuse as multidimensional and be cognizant that
the qualitative differences in cyber dating abuse categories could impact results. To
further advance a violence prevention agenda, studies should focus on identifying cyber
dating abuse prevalence rates and accompanying risk and protective factors among at risk
groups like same sex couples (Butchart et al., 2002; CDC, 2021; Graham et al., 2021).
Same-sex couples have a higher likelihood of engaging in in-person IPV, and additional
research is necessary to understand how sexual orientation status and IPV risk translates
to technological forms of abuse.
Another suggestion is to extend this line of research to include individuals who
self-identify in another gender category other than women, e.g., non-binary individuals.
Although there are commonalities in violence victimization and perpetration experiences,
social identity, especially those that are marginalized and oppressed, is related to
differential protective and risk factors, physical and mental health outcomes, and life
trajectories post victimization (Cardenas, 2020; Censhaw, 1993; Cho et al., 2015; Hereth,
2021; Peitzmeier et al., 2020; Whitfield et al., 2021; Whitton et al., 2019). For example,
individuals who identity as transgender or gender non-confirming have greater likelihood
of experiencing IPV victimization when compared to cisgender gender women (Valentine
et al., 2017).
41
At the intersection of multiple social identities, like self-identifying as Latinx and
gender nonconforming, or self-identifying as Latinx and non-heterosexual, there are
unique culturally relevant risk and protective factors for IPV. The finding that family
support mediated the relationship between Latinx cultural orientation and sexual cyber
dating abuse is specific to Latina heterosexual women. Literature supports the construct
of familism and perceptions of family support among Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender
and Queer (LGBTQ) individuals as complex and multifaceted (Laboy, 2008; Messinger
et al., 2021; Weinhardt et al., 2019). The pathways between Latinx cultural orientation
and family support as protective against sexual IPV may be different among LGBTQ
couples. For example, transgender individuals report seeking support for IPV
victimization from formal services rather than family and friends (Messinger et al.,
2021). Additional research should examine culturally protective factors, or risk factors,
among these populations.
This extension of scope should not be limited to gender identity, but also include
exploring the potential differential experiences of various racial and ethnic identities with
cyber dating abuse. A social identity in psychological science that has systematically
been rendered invisible is race among Latinx samples; especially the implications of
being a Black Latinx person (Adames et al., 2021; Stephens et al., 2012). Moving
forward, studies could implement the Entering Racial Ethnic Identity Framework to
contextualize violence research with Latinx communities (Adames et al., 2021).
Conclusions
Social media platforms, cell phone use, and other technology -mediated
communication platforms have created a space for intimate partner abuse (Duerksen et
42
al., 2020; Hertlein et al., 2020), transforming understandings and experiences of IPV
(Flach & Deslandes, 2017; Lu et al., 2018; Zweig et al., 2014). Among racial/ethnic
minority groups in the US, there has been a disproportionate experience of IPV (Black et
al., 2011; Caetano et al., 2005; Eaton & Stephens, 2018; Reingle et al., 2014). In the most
extreme case of death among intimate partners, researchers have found that racial/ethnic
minorities die nearly a decade earlier than the White majority by those killed by an
intimate partner (Graham et al., 2021). Gender disparities are also present, where a higher
proportion of women have suffered from intimate partner violence fatalities than men
(Graham et al., 2021). Therefore, IPV prevention focused research among racial/ethnic
minority populations is necessary, especially among novel forms of violence. This study
builds on the scare cyber dating abuse research among Latinx communities (Cano-
Gonzalez et al., 2020; Reed et al., 2020), and contributes to furthering the research
agenda of reducing health disparities and increasing equitable living conditions.
43
III. STUDY TWO: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT
LATINAS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CYBER DATING ABUSE, IN-PERSON
ABUSE, HEALTH BEHAVIORS, AND WELL-BEING
Abstract
Technological modalities have created novel avenues for abuse to be perpetrated.
Within the context of romantic relationships, cyber dating abuse has emerged as another
type of intimate partner violence (IPV). Like in-person forms of IPV, studies are
consistently finding that when women are compared to men, women experience a
disproportionate amount of victimization (Marganski & Fauth, 2013; Zweig et al., 2014).
Yet cyber dating abuse research among racial/ethnic minority groups is lacking. The
purpose of this study is to examine the experience of cyber dating abuse victimization
among Latina women. Using a longitudinal design, we examined the relationship
between cyber dating abuse victimization and IPV risk and protective factors. Findings
indicated no relationship between victimization and later depression, anxiety, sexual risk
taking, and alcohol use. Additionally, there were concurrent and prospective relationships
between in-person forms of IPV and cyber dating abuse subtypes. This study provides
evidence for the importance of including technological forms of relationship abuse into
violence prevention and intervention efforts.
Keywords: Hispanic, Latina, IPV, partner abuse, polyvictimization
44
One growing form of dating violence is the use of technology to perpetrate harm
within the context of a romantic relationship (Flach & Deslandes, 2017). Researchers
have labeled this “cyber aggression in relationships” (Watkins et al., 2018), “cyber dating
abuse” (Borrajo, Gámez-Guadix, & Calvete, 2015a), “intimate partner cyberaggression”
(Marganski & Melander, 2018), and “intimate partner cyberharassment” (Melander,
2010), among other terms (see Flach & Deslandes, 2017 for a review). Cyber dating
abuse is characterized as intimate partner abuse facilitated by technology, such that
technology is used to enact harm and control towards a romantic partner (Watkins et al.,
2018).
Cyber dating abuse contains three dimensions: direct aggression (Borrajo, Gámez-
Guadix, Pereda, & Calvete, 2015b), control monitoring (Borrajo et al., 2015b), and a
sexual component (Stonard et al., 2014; Zweig, Dank, Lachman, & Yahner, 2013). Direct
aggression behaviors include the use of technology, like social media or texts, to insult or
threaten a romantic partner (Borrajo et al., 2015b). Control monitoring cyber dating abuse
includes behaviors intended to control the partner and monitor partner behaviors, such as
checking personal social media messages (Watkins et al., 2018). These two elements are
categorized as nonsexual components of cyber dating abuse (Dick et al., 2014; Van
Ouytsel et al., 2017; Zweig et al., 2013). Sexual cyber dating abuse, on the other hand,
includes forms of sexual aggression, like pressuring a romantic partner to send sexually
explicit pictures or threatening the partner if they refused to send sexualized context
(Dick et al., 2014; Fernet et al., 2019; Watkins et al., 2018; Zweig et al., 2013).
Although there is overlap in definitions between cyber dating abuse and other
forms of intimate partner violence (IPV), there is a qualitative difference in that the
45
technological component of cyber dating abuse allows the victim to be accessed without
time constraints and physical presence (Lu et al., 2018; Zweig, Lachman, Yahner, &
Dank, 2014). Also, given the interconnectedness that technological and cyber platforms
provide public degradation and humiliation of a victim may be achieved more quickly
and easily through cyber dating abuse than other forms of IPV (Zweig et al., 2014).
However, despite this being a unique form of IPV, legislative definitions for
criminalizing IPV have yet to incorporate this technological component (United States
Department of Justice, 2020).
Latina Emerging Adults
While the majority of the research on cyber dating abuse has used adolescent
samples (Dick et al., 2014; Lu et al., 2018; Temple et al., 2016; Van Ouystel, Ponnet,
Walrave, & Temple, 2016; Van Ouystel, Ponnet, & Walrave, 2017; Zweig et al., 2014),
research on emerging adults is of equal importance. Emerging adulthood (ages 18-29;
Arnett et al., 2014) is a developmental period specific to Western countries where the
identity formation and exploration that began in adolescence continue to progress (Arnett,
2010). Identity formation is the process of individual self-reflection on personal views,
values, beliefs, and goals (Schwartz et al., 2010; Schwartz, Côté, Arnett, 2005) while
identity exploration is the process of the individual weighing different identities to find
which one best fits with their personal sense of self (Allem, Sussman, & Unger, 2017;
Luyckx, Schwartz, Goossens, Beyers, & Missotten, 2011). During this developmental
period, engagement with and exploration of romantic and sexual intimacy is integral
(Shulman, & Connolly, 2013, Zimmer-Gembeck, Hughes, Kelly, & Connolly, 2012).
Therefore, it is important to examine healthy and unhealthy romantic relationship
46
behaviors during this stage, like cyber dating abuse. This is especially true since age has
also been identified as an important risk factor for IPV, with perpetration risk being
highest in the early twenties (Johnson, Giordano, Manning, & Longmore, 2015). In fact,
a total of 71.1% women and 55.8% of men had their first experience with IPV
victimization before age 25 (Smith et al., 2018).
A second limitation in the cyber dating abuse literature is the focus on
predominately White samples within the United States. It is crucial to examine this
modern form of dating violence among adults from racial/ethnic minority backgrounds
given that these communities are often at a heightened risk for IPV (Black et al., 2011;
Eaton & Stephens, 2018; Reingle, Jennings, Connell, Businelle, & Chartier, 2014). For
instance, a study examining risk factors for IPV reported that racial/ethnic minority
groups, specifically Blacks and Latinx and women, were more likely to report
victimization and perpetration in comparison to Whites and men (Reingle et al., 2014).
Further, racial/ethnic minorities have the lowest median household income and highest
rates of poverty (Macartney, Bishaw, & Fontenot, 2013; Semega, Fontenot, Kollar,
2017), which are associated with higher lifetime levels of IPV victimization (Breiding,
Black, & Ryan, 2008). Community level risk factors are also associated with IPV, in
particular community violence and neighborhood disorder (Cummings, Gonzalez-
Guarda, & Sandoval, 2013; Cunradi, 2009; Raghavan, Mennerich, Sexton, & James,
2006; Raghavan, Rajah, Gentile, Collado, & Kavanagh, 2009). Among men and women
who self-identify as Latinx, there is an association between neighborhood disorder,
characterized as crime in the neighborhood, street fights, desolate and graphitized
buildings, and IPV (Cunaldi, 2009). Neighborhood disorder increases the likelihood of
47
IPV perpetration among Latino men, and neighborhood disorder and alcohol abuse
increase the likelihood for IPV victimization among Latina women (Cunradi, 2009).
Among heterosexual Latinx couples, the recurrence of severe IPV is four times
higher when compared to White couples over a five-year period (Caetano et al., 2005).
Among Latinx emerging adults, an estimated 32% report IPV victimization while an
estimated 27% report IPV perpetration in the past year (Grest, Lee, Gilreath, & Unger,
2018). For Latina emerging adult women, psychological (9.8%) followed by sexual
(8.3%) IPV was the most common type of perpetration, and sexual (15.6%) followed by
psychological (10.8%) was the most common type for victimization (Grest et al., 2018).
Interestingly, IPV prevalence rates for Latinas decrease from their early twenties to their
late twenties, indicating that Latinas are at increased risk for IPV in early emerging
adulthood (Nowotny & Graves, 2013). Therefore, an objective of this study is to examine
cyber dating abuse among Latina emerging adults and its relationship to mental health
and health risk behaviors, and polyvictimization.
Cyber Dating Abuse and Gender
At the intersection of technology and abuse, gender differences have been found
in technology-facilitated sexual violence, which is when technology is used as a
mechanism to enact physical and virtual sexual harms (Henry & Powell, 2018). A review
of the literature finds that women are the most common targets for online sexual
harassment and “revenge porn,” which is when a sexually explicit image is distributed
without consent with the intent to harm (Henry & Powell, 2018). This finding is
consistent with research on nonconsensual porn, which includes the nonconsensual
distribution of sexually explicit images (Ruvalcaba & Eaton, 2019). Nonconsensual porn
48
is an umbrella term which includes revenge porn as well as the distribution of sexually
explicit images for any reason (e.g., profit, humor, etc.). Nonconsensual porn is
considered a gendered form of digital sexual abuse, where women are at higher risk for
victimization and men are at higher risk for perpetration (Ruvalcaba & Eaton, 2019).
These forms of abuse postulate that when the type of abuse is sexual in nature, women
will be at a higher risk for victimization than men (Henry & Powell, 2018; Ruvalcaba &
Eaton, 2019; Smith et al., 2018).
Other findings suggest that college women are three times more likely to
experience victimization by technology-facilitated dating aggression than men
(Marganski & Fauth, 2013). Martinez-Pecino & Durán (2016) found that men perpetrated
cyber dating abuse more often than women, and that hostile sexist beliefs towards women
accounted for the variance in this relationship. Other studies reported no gender
differences in perpetration (Reed, Tolman, & Ward, 2016), and victimization (Wolford-
Clevenger et al., 2016) of digital dating abuse among college students. Being female is
one of the strongest correlates with cyber dating abuse among youth (Zweig et al., 2014),
with females ages 13-19 years reporting higher rates of cyber dating abuse victimization
than males (Dick et al., 2014).
Acculturation and Intimate Partner Violence
Guided by intersectionality theory, an additional cultural and identity
consideration in understanding cyber dating violence among Latinx emerging adults is
acculturation, or “…the process of culture change and adaptation that occurs when
individuals with different cultures come into contact” (Gibson, 2001, p. 19). Within the
context of the United States, acculturation refers to the process of adopting White
49
American culture, or the “receiving cultures’” practices, values, and identification
(Schwartz, Unger, Zamboanga, & Szapocznik, 2010). Initially the acculturation model
was unidimensional, describing individuals as moving along a continuum from
immersion in their heritage culture to immersion in the receiving culture. In this old
model, accepting one culture meant departure from the other culture. Now understood as
a multidimensional model, integration into the receiving culture does not diminish or
erase the individual’s heritage culture (Schwartz et al., 2010). This updated model posits
that the dimensions of receiving-culture acquisition and heritage-culture retention are
independent (Schwartz et al., 2010).
Within IPV and acculturation research, the concept of high acculturation is
consistent with assimilation in the multidimensional model, whereby a highly
acculturated individual is highly immersed in the dominant culture (Caetano, Schafer,
Clark, Cunradi, & Raspberry, 2000; Caetano, Ramisetty-Mikler, & McGrath, 2004;
Garcia, Hurwitz, & Kraus, 2005; Harris, Firestone, & Vega, 2005; Jasinki, 1998). In
other words, high acculturation is synonymous to high levels of host culture assimilation
(Smokowski et al., 2009). Research using Latinx samples has supported a significant
relationship between acculturation and IPV, with increased acculturation being associated
with increased IPV perpetration for males and victimization for females (Garcia et al.,
2005; Grest et al, 2017; Jasinki, 1998; Sabina, Cuevas, & Zadnik, 2015), albeit not all
(Cunradi, 2009; Grest et al., 2018; Ramirez, 2007). The finding consistent across the
majority of studies is that high acculturation is associated with increased IPV experience,
while Latinx orientation decreases odds of IPV victimization and perpetration; this
supports Latinx culture as protective against IPV (Alvarez, Ramirez, Frietze, Field, &
50
Zárate, 2018; Garcia et al., 2005; Grest et al., 2017; Gonzalez-Guarda et al., 2012;
Jasinki, 1998; Sabina et al., 2015). In fact, a meta-analysis reported a significant positive
relationship between acculturation and IPV victimization among Latinx samples,
although small r = .11 (Alvarez et al., 2018). Guided by intersectionality theory, the
acculturation framework will be used to contextualize cyber dating abuse victimization.
Cyber Dating Abuse and Polyvictimization
Ample research finds that the various forms of in-person IPV usually co-occur
(Flanagan, Jaquier, Gordon, Moore, & Stuart, 2014; Halpern-Meekin, Manning,
Giordano, & Longmore, 2013; Jun, Rich-Edwards, Boynton-Jarrett, & Wright, 2008;
Sullivan, McPartland, Armeli, Jaquier, & Tennen, 2012) - a phenomenon called
“polyvictimization” (Sabina & Straus, 2008). For example, among unmarried young
adults being in an unstable romantic relationship increased the likelihood of experiencing
physical and verbal abuse (Halpern-Meekin et al., 2013). A study across 19 U.S. colleges
reported that approximately 50% of men and women who reported IPV victimization
experienced polyvictimization, with the most common combination being psychological,
physical, and sexual victimization (Sabina & Straus, 2008).
Previous research has also found a positive relationship between the occurrence of
cyber dating abuse and psychological, physical, and sexual in-person IPV (Borrajo et al.,
2015a, Marganski & Melander, 2018; Paat et al., 2019; Reed et al., 2016; Wolford-
Clevenger et al., 2016; Zweig et al., 2013). Among U.S. college students, there is a
positive association between cyber dating abuse with psychological and sexual abuse
(Reed et al., 2016). Similarly, cyber dating abuse co-occurs with physical and
psychological abuse, sexual coercion, and depressive symptoms among college students
51
(Wolford-Clevenger et al., 2016). Further, the odds of experiencing in-person IPV
victimization are significantly increased with the experience of intimate partner cyber
aggression (Marganski & Melander, 2018). Previous studies find similar results, where
there is a positive relationship between cyber dating abuse with psychological and
physical offline dating violence (Borrajo et al., 2015a; Borrajo et al., 2015b; Borrajo et
al., 2015c; Hinduja & Patchin, 2011). In the same way that verbal victimization tends to
precede physical victimization (Straus, Gelles, & Steinmetz, 2006), highlighting the
escalation of partner abuse from nonphysical to physical, evidence that supports the
escalation from cyber dating abuse to verbal aggression, and subsequently to physical
aggression (Madlock & Westerman, 2011).
Most of the research on cyber dating abuse originates from the United States and
Spain. In Spain prevalence rates for perpetration range from 47% - 80%, and
victimization from 50% - 57.2% among samples of young adults ages 18-30 years
(Borrajo et al, 2015a; Borrajo et al., 2015c; Martinez-Pecino & Durán, 2016; Segura &
Pecino, 2015). Within the United States, Marganski and Melander (2018) conducted a
study to examine intimate partner cyber aggression among college students, age 18 - 25,
and its relationship with intimate partner polyvictimization, and found that approximately
70% of college students reporting cyber aggression victimization (Marganski &
Melander, 2018). Results also indicated that over 90% of respondents that reported in
person intimate partner victimization, also reported intimate partner cyber aggression
victimization. Reed and colleagues (2016) examined digital dating abuse among college
students, age 17 – 22. Digital dating abuse was conceptualized as behaviors aimed to
control, pressure, or threaten by means of cell phones or online platforms. Approximately
52
74% of their sample reported victimization, and 69.5% of their sample reported
perpetration, where monitoring partner’s locations and social networks were the most
frequent reported behaviors. Although there was overlap between perpetration and
victimization, the bidirectionality of the abusive behaviors could not be established in this
study (Reed et al., 2016).
Temple and colleagues (2016) established the reciprocity of cyber dating abuse
perpetration and victimization using longitudinal methods, across a year, among a sample
of high school students. Results indicated a positive relationship between cyber dating
abuse victimization and perpetration at the initial and final time point. Research shows
that emerging adults experience high rates of cyber dating abuse victimization at 73%,
which is higher than the national average of 36.4% IPV victimization for women, and
33.6% (Marganski & Melander, 2018; Smith et al., 2018). Taken together, these findings
suggest that college students, especially those in emerging adulthood, are a high-risk
group for cyber dating abuse, and are at higher risk for other types of IPV. Thus, the
second aim of this study is to examine the relationship between cyber dating abuse and
other forms of intimate partner aggression over time.
Cyber Dating Abuse and Mental Health
In-person forms of IPV are associated with worse mental health among adult
victims when compared to non victims (Caldwell, Swan, & Woodbrown, 2012; Johnson,
Giordano, Longmore, & Manning, 2014; Sabina & Straus, 2008; Saewyc et al., 2009;
Shorey et al., 2011). Specifically, victims of IPV report more symptoms of anxiety and
depression than non-victims (for review see Caldwell et al., 2012). Like in-person
partner abuse, cyber dating abuse victimization has been associated with negative mental
53
health correlates. A cross-sectional study of adolescents reported a positive relationship
between cyber dating abuse victimization and depressive symptoms, as well as anger/
hostility (Zweig et al., 2014). Only one study has used longitudinal data to examine
mental health and substance use related to cyber dating abuse victimization, which
focused on adolescents (Lu et al., 2018). They found a positive relationship between
victimization and problematic mental health, like anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic
stress disorder. The effect was present cross-sectionally, not longitudinally, which was a
year after reporting victimization. The authors suggested that the mental health effects
could potentially be more acute shortly after the incident, rather than prolonged.
The rest of the investigations on this topic have applied cross sectional designs.
For example, the only study among emerging adults, with a predominately White sample,
reported that electronic harassment by an intimate partner increased the odds of
experiencing depression and anxiety, and among women this victimization was
associated with fear (Lindsay, Booth, & Messing, 2016). Cantu and colleagues (2020)
found similar results, where depression was positively associated with psychological and
sexual cyber dating abuse. To address this gap in the literature, this will be the first study
to examine depression and anxiety as an outcome of cyber dating abuse victimization
among Latinx young adults using longitudinal methods.
Cyber Dating Abuse and Substance Use
Research also finds a positive association between in-person partner abuse
victimization and substance use (Cafferky, Mendez, Anderson, & Stith, 2018; Devries et
al., 2014). A meta-analysis examined the association between substance use, drug and
alcohol use, and physical IPV victimization and perpetration using a combined sample of
54
over 600,000 heterosexual men and women, excluding university students (Cafferky et
al., 2018). The aggregate analysis of overall substance use on victimization and
perpetration was positive and statistically significant, though this meta-analysis did not
provide information about causality related to substance use and IPV. Devries and
colleagues (2014) also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on alcohol use
and physical and sexual IPV victimization among women and found that alcohol use and
IPV victimization are linked. Again, however, directionality in the relationship between
alcohol use and IPV victimization was conflicting given that the meta-analyses provided
support for both.
Some individual studies have found that substance use precedes IPV victimization
(Railford et al., 2007; Stappenbeck & Fromme, 2010; Testa et al., 2003). Heavy drinking
during sophomore year in college, for example, predicted dating violence victimization
and perpetration for women in their junior year, but not men (Stappenbeck & Fromme,
2010). The predominant explanations are that (a) potentially both partners may use
substances, creating a context of aggression resulting in victimization experience (Shorey
et al., 2011; Stappenbeck & Fromme, 2010) and this link could be explained by difficulty
in managing conflict by the substance user (Testa et al., 2003), or that conflict arises
because of substance use of partners or the victim (Smith et al., 2012; Testa et al., 2003).
Substantial research also supports substance use as an outcome of victimization.
One explanation as to why IPV victimization is related to subsequent substance use is the
self-medication hypothesis, or self-medication theory, which posits that individuals turn
to substances to alleviate negative affect (Khantzian, 1997; La Flair et al., 2012). This
theory has been supported by research that finds that IPV victimization can precede
55
substance use (Ahmadabadi et al., 2019; Derrick & Testa, 2017; Martino et al., 2005;
Testa & Leonard, 2001; Salomon et al., 2002; Shorey et al., 2016). Tied to this self-
medication theory is that self-medication, or engagement in substance use, is a form of
coping among victims of IPV (Ahmadabadi et al., 2019; Testa & Leonard, 2001; Øverup,
DiBello, Brunson, Acitelli, & Neighbors, 2015; Shorey et al., 2016; Temple et al., 2008;
Weiss, Duke, & Sullivan, 2014). This is evidenced by results that support drinking to
cope as a mediator between IPV victimization and problematic alcohol use (Kaysen et al.,
2007; Øverup et al., 2015), and that high and low levels of avoidance coping are
predictive of drug use problems following IPV experience (Weiss et al., 2014).
Although the relationship between substance use and in-person IPV among adults
has been extensively examined, there is limited research on these domains as they relate
to cyber dating abuse. Most research on this topic has focused on adolescents. This work
finds that adolescent victims report higher levels of binge drinking than non-victims (Van
Ouystel et al., 2016), and adolescent perpetrators of cyber dating abuse report higher
levels of substance use, including the use of alcohol, cigarettes, and prescription
medications (Van Ouytsel et al., 2017). This is further substantiated by longitudinal
evidence, which finds an association between cyber dating abuse victimization and
subsequent substance use over one year (Lu et al., 2018). There are currently two studies
that focus on young adults (Bennett, Guran, Ramos, & Margolin, 2011; Brem et al.,
2019). One study employed a design and found a positive correlation between female
electronic dating partner victimization and substance use, but no effect for males (Bennett
et al., 2011). A more recent study used a longitudinal design and found that alcohol
problems were not predictive of cyber dating abuse perpetration (Brem et al., 2019).
56
Thus, guided by previous research supporting self-medication theory and coping model,
alcohol use will be examined as an outcome of cyber dating abuse victimization using
longitudinal methods.
Cyber Dating Abuse and Sexual Risk Taking
Victims of partner violence are also at an increased risk of being diagnosed with
an STI/ STD, which has been connected to engagement in sexual risk-taking behaviors
and (Bauer et al., 2002; Coker, 2007; Fair & Vanyur, 2011; Lévesque et al., 2016; Mittal,
Senn, & Carey, 2012). IPV and sexual risk taking is related through sexual decision-
making factors (Campbell et al., 2008; Minton et al., 2016). One of these factors includes
fear, where women in abusive relationships refrain from negotiating condom use due to
fear of partner’s reaction (Campbell et al., 2008). Another factor has been identified is
relationship power, which reflects decision making capabilities within the partnership and
the degree to which one partner influences and controls the other partner’s behaviors
(Minton et al., 2016). Women in abusive relationships report low relationship power,
which is associated with unprotected sex (Minton et al., 2016). Partner dependence across
economic, safety, and emotional domains has also been identified as a factor associated
with a decrease in condom use among abused women (Minton et al.., 2016).
Within cyber dating abuse literature, there is a strong positive correlation
between youth engagement in sexual intercourse and cyber dating abuse victimization, as
well as unsafe sexual practices, contraceptive non-use among females, and more lifetime
sexual partnerships (Dick et al., 2014; Van Ouystel et al., 2016; Zweig et al., 2014). The
cyber dating abuse literature and risky sexual behaviors with emerging adult samples is
lacking, with only one study addressing this issue (Bennett et al., 2011). This study
57
reported a positive correlation among electronic victimization by a dating partner and
risky sex in their female sample. Thus, a final aim of this study is to extend the research
by exploring the longitudinal association of sexual risk taking as an outcome cyber dating
victimization among Latina emerging adults.
Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses
This study is grounded by intersectionality theory, which is a culturally competent
theoretical framework ideal for contextualizing and exploring experiences of violence
among marginalized groups. In this case, the experience of cyber dating abuse among
Latina heterosexual emerging adults. Intersectionality theory states that to understand a
phenomenon, an individual’s multiple intersecting social identities must be considered
(Cole, 2009; Bowleg, 2012). An intersection of social identities refers to an individual
encompassing multiple categorizations within their identity, which can include gender,
race, and class. For example, the intersection of gender, sexual orientation, and ethnicity
as a social identity is a Latina woman or a Latino man. This intersection of social
identities is important because they shape the lived experiences of the individual, and the
kinds of privileges and oppressions they live with (Cole, 2009).
When examining IPV experience among Latina emerging adults, cultural identity
must be considered in conjunction with gender identity. Given that minority groups in the
United States experience systematic oppressions which lead to differential experiences in
with violence and health disparities, this purpose of this study is to focus on Latina
women’s experience with a modern form of relationship abuse, cyber dating abuse; see
Figure 2 for conceptual model. The first aim of this study is to contextualize
victimization within the framework of acculturation, and test Latinx cultural orientation
58
as a protective factor against victimization. The second aim is to assess the relationship
between cyber dating abuse and other forms of in-person dating violence over time. The
third aim is to assess the longitudinal association between cyber dating abuse
victimization in their current relationship and anxiety, depression, alcohol use, and sexual
risk taking across two time points, three months apart, as outcomes. This is among one of
the few cyber dating abuse studies to date to focus on a Latinx population (Cantu et al.,
2020; Cano-Gonzalez et al., 2020; Reed et al, 2020). With the rationalization guided by
intersectionality theory, and empirical evidence on cyber dating abuse, the predictions are
as follows for Latinx women:
Hypothesis 1: Greater Latinx cultural orientation at T1 would decrease the
frequency of cyber dating abuse victimization at T2.
Hypothesis 2: Cyber dating abuse victimization at T1 would be related to an
increase in depression (2a), anxiety (2b), alcohol use (2c), and sexual risk taking
(2d).
Hypothesis 3: The frequency of cyber dating abuse victimization would be
associated with in-person forms of dating violence victimization, including
psychological aggression, physical assault, sexual coercion, and verbal sexual
coercion at Time 1 (H3a) and Time 2 (H3b).
59
Figure 2. Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 2
Methods
Procedure
A two time point longitudinal design was implemented with a three-month time
lag. Participants were recruited from a large Hispanic serving institution in the
southeastern United States. The survey was advertised in an online platform hosted by the
university. The prerequisites for participation in this study were to self-identify as a
Latina woman, be within the age range of 18 – 29 years and be involved in a current
dating relationship with a male dating partner. Recruitment began in the spring of 2020.
Participants who completed T1 survey were compensated with extra credit for eligible
courses. For follow up survey participation, a $10.00 USD electronic Starbucks gift card
was provided. There was a three-month time lag between the two data collection points.
There was a 52% (n = 295/563) retention rate from baseline to follow up.
60
Participant Demographics
The average age of participants was 22.19 (SD = 2.55). Prevalence rates of T1
cyber dating abuse victimization within the past 6 months of taking the survey were
7.91% for sexual CDA (n = 44/512), 22.76% for psychological CDA (n = 127/431), and
32.73% for stalking CDA (n = 182/374). Participants also reported their generational
status with 39.08% (n = 220/563) being 1st generation, 42.63% (n = 240/563) being 2nd
generation, 8.90% (n = 50/563) being 2.5 generation, 6.04% (n = 34/563) being 3rd
generation, 2.66% (n = 15/563) being 4th generation, 0.36% (n = 2/ 563) being 5th
generation. Most participants indicated that their familial nation of origin was Cuba
45.2%, n = 252/558; see Table 5). Among those who participated at both time points, the
average age was 22.04 (SD = 2.46). At T2, a total of 22.68% (n = 66/291) reported
psychological CDA, a total of 31.96% (n = 93/291) reported stalking CDA, and a total a
total of 9.28% (n = 27/291) reported sexual CDA. The generational status for the two
time point completers, was 36.61% (n = 108/295) for 1st generation, 42.71% (n =
126/295) for 2nd generation, 8.47% (n = 25/295) for 2.5 generation, 7.80% (n = 23/295)
for 3rd generation, 3.73% (n = 11/295) for 4th generation, and 0.34% (n = 1/295) for 5th
generation. Within this sub sample, the most highly reported familial nation of origin was
Cuba (41.36%, n = 122/295). Descriptive statistics for all variables included in the SEM
model and correlations are presented in Table 6.
61
Table 5
Study 2 First Familial Nation of Origin
First familial nation of origin N %

USA 11 2%
Argentina 9 1.6%
Argentina/Ecuador 1 0.2%
Bolivia 3 0.5%
Brazil 8 1.4%
Chile 8 1.4%
Colombia 47 8.4%
Costa Rica 3 0.5%
Cuba 252 45.2%
Cuba/Mexico 2 0.4%
Cuba/Peru 1 0.2%
Cuba/Puerto Rico 1 0.2%
Dominican Republic 25 4.5%
Ecuador 13 2.3%
Egypt 1 0.2%
Guatemala 4 0.7%
Honduras 16 2.9%
Italia 3 0.5%
Jamaica 1 0.2%
Jamaica/Dominican Republic 1 0.2%
Lebanon 1 0.2%
Mexico 15 2.7%
Nicaragua 33 5.9%
Nicaragua/Spain 1 0.2%
Panama 2 0.4%
Peru 22 3.9%
Puerto Rico 26 4.7%
Puerto Rico/Dominican Republic 1 0.2%
Salvador 1 0.2%
Spain 6 1.1%
Uruguay 1 0.2%
Venezuela 39 7%
62
Table 6
Study 2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations

Variable M SD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. Psych CDA 1.27 4.61
2. Sexual
0.28 1.38 .19**
CDA
[.11,
.27]
3. Stalking
3.68 13.58 .52** .22**
CDA
[.46, [.14,
.58] .30]
4. RiskySex_1 2.67 1.62 .05 -.02 .04

[-.03, [-.10, [-.04,
.13] .07] .13]
5. RiskySex_2 0.42 0.60 .12** -.03 .08 .04

[.04, [-.11, [-.00, [-.04,
.20] .05] .16] .12]
6. Depression 5.52 5.46 .20** .14** .22** .00 .08*

[.12, [.06, [.14, [-.08, [.00,
.28] .22] .30] .08] .17]
7. Anxiety 4.31 4.78 .23** .10* .24** .06 .16** .78**

[.15, [.02, [.16, [-.03, [.07, [.75,
.31] .19] .31] .14] .24] .81]
8. LOS 4.11 0.61 -.02 -.04 -.01 -.05 -.01 -.05 -.10*
63
[-.11, [-.12, [-.10, [-.13, [-.10, [-.13, [-.19, -
.06] .05] .07] .04] .07] .04] .02]
9. Alcohol
4.55 3.58 .10* .14** .06 .08 .20** .13** .15** -.13**
Use
[.00, [.05, [-.03, [-.01, [.11, [.04, [.05, [-.22, -
.19] .23] .15] .18] .29] .22] .24] .03]
Note. M and SD are used to represent mean and standard deviation, respectively. Values in square brackets indicate the 95% confidence
interval for each correlation. * indicates p < .05. ** indicates p < .01
64
Attrition
There was a 52.40% retention rate with 563 completed surveys at baseline and
295 surveys at follow up. Chi square analyses were used to examine potential differences
between participants who participated in follow up and those who only participated at
baseline. Analyses indicated no statistically significant differences between attrition
status and ever experienced cyber dating abuse victimization, X2 (1) = 0.00, p > .05,
psychological cyber dating abuse frequency, X2 (21) = 20.81, p = .047, stalking cyber
dating abuse frequency X2 (38) = 36.69, p = .53, sexual cyber dating abuse frequency, X2
(8) = 6.00, p = 0.65, and in person dating abuse victimization, X2 (1) = 0.10, p = .76.
Dating abuse victimization status at T1 was not related with participant response rate at
follow up. There was also no association with age at participation at follow up, X2 (11) =
10.03, p = .53.
Measures
After participants completed the online consent form, they were asked to
complete a series of questions asking about their demographic information, only at Time
1, and their experiences with their current romantic relationship at the time of survey
completion at both time points. The order of measure presentation is based on the study
“Technology, Teen Dating Violence and Abuse, and Bullying” (Zweig et al., 2013).
Initially, demographic items, such as gender and generational status, followed by the
acculturation measure, were presented to participants. Then, participants were asked
questions related to multiple forms of dating violence, i.e., psychological aggression,
physical assault, sexual coercion, verbal sexual coercion, and cyber dating abuse. This
was followed by questions that measured level of alcohol consumption, symptoms related
65
to depression and anxiety, and sexual risk taking. An attention check was implemented to
safeguard against surveys that would bias result estimates due to inattention. At the end
of the survey, local and national intimate partner violence related resources were
provided to all participants.
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II. The Acculturation
Rating Scale for Mexican Americans-II (ARMSA-II) is the revised version of the original
Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican Americans (Cuéllar, Arnold, and Maldonado
1995). It was developed to examine the acculturation process via cultural orientation
using 30 items (Cuéllar et al., 1995). The items are not specific to Mexican cultural
identity and have been administered to Latinx groups more broadly (Dennis et al., 2016;
Kazak et al., 2018). To be applicable to Latinx groups the scale was adapted by changing
reference to Mexico to “my culture of origin [e.g., Mexico, El Salvador, etc.,]” (Dennis et
al., 2016) and changing “Mexican” to “Latino/Hispanic” (Kazak et al., 2018). This
measure includes two orthogonal subscales, the 17 items Mexican Orientation Subscale,
which has been adapted to the Latinx orientation subscale, and the 13 items Anglo
orientation subscale (Cuéllar et al., 1995; Dennis et al., 2016). These orthogonal
subscales represent the degree to which the participant affiliates with their heritage
culture, Latinx cultural orientation, and to the majority culture, Anglo orientation (Dennis
et al., 2016). An example item reflecting Anglo orientation is “I enjoy listening to
English language music”, and “My family cooks Latino/Hispanic foods” which reflects
Latino orientation. Agreement with each statement was declared on five-point Likert
scales from not at all (0) to extremely often or almost always (5). The ARMSA-II had
adequate reliability in this study (α = 0.82)
66
Psychological Aggression Subscale, Physical Assault Subscale, and Sexual
Coercion Subscale. The Psychological Aggression Subscale, Physical Assault Subscale,
and Sexual Coercion Subscale are part of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS-2;
Straus et al., 1996). Across the three subscales participants indicated the frequency in
which each behavior occurred from (0) this has never happened to (7) not in the past
year, but it did happen before. An example of the 8-item psychological aggression
subscale is “Insulted or swore at partner”. The Physical Assault Subscale is a 12-item
subscale (e.g., “Kicked, bit, or punched partner”). The Sexual Coercion Subscale is a
seven-item subscale. An example item is “Used threats to make partner have sex”. CTS-2
had adequate reliability (α = 0.92), as did the subscales with an α = .80 for psychological,
an α = 0.86 for physical, and an α = 0.77 for sexual.
Verbal Sexual Coercion Scale. Verbal sexual coercion was measured by 15 items
from the Influence Tactics Scale. The items described verbal tactics used by dating
partners to engage an intimate partner into more sexual activity than they want, e.g.,
“dropping hints” (Eaton & Matamala, 2014; Howard et al., 1986). Participants reported
on the frequency of their experiences with verbal sexual coercion from never (1) to
always (7). An example item is “Tell your partner that if he/she did this you will love
him/her forever”. The verbal sexual coercion measure had adequate reliability (α = 0.85).
Cyber Aggression in Relationships Scale. The Cyber Aggression in
Relationships scale examined participant experience with abuse in a romantic relationship
through digital platforms (Watkins et al., 2018). This 17-item measure was answered on a
7-point scale from (0) this has never happened to (6) more than 20 times in the past 6
months, and (7) not in the past 6 months, but it did happen before (7). Likert scale
67
responses were transformed to provide estimates of cyber dating abuse frequency as
recommended by Watkins and colleagues (2018). This multidimensional cyber dating
abuse scale include subscales for three distinct types of abuse: psychological, stalking,
and sexual. Emergent literature has identified two other types of sexual abuse that are
facilitated by technological spaces (Eaton et al., 2020; Eaton et al., 2017; Ruvalcaba &
Eaton, 2020). The questions were adapted from a nationwide study of nonconsensual
pornography (1) “Has your romantic partner ever threatened to share a sexually-explicit
image or video of you without your consent?” (2) “Has your romantic partner ever
threatened to share a sexually-explicit image or video of you without your consent?” The
19 items produced an adequate reliability at Cronbach’s α = 0.92. The subtypes also had
an adequate reliability with an α = .78 for psychological, an α = 0.86 for stalking, and an
α = 0.82 for sexual.
The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test. Alcohol use was measured by the
10-item Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (Babor et al., 2001; Saunders et al.,
1993). A global continuum of risk score was calculated by adding all response scores
(Babor et al., 2001). The AUDIT had acceptable reliability (α = 0.73)
Depressive Symptoms Subscale and Anxiety Subscale. To assess psychological
wellbeing the Depressive symptoms Subscale and Anxiety Subscale from the Symptom
Assessment45 (SA-45) Questionnaire (Strategic Advantage, Inc. 1998). The SA-45 is a
valid and reliable measure of general psychological distress among patient and non-
patient populations (Maruish, 2004; Maruish, Bershadsky, & Goldstein, 1998). Both
these subscales contain response items ranging from (0) not at all to (4) extremely, and
score value from zero to 20, with higher values being indicative of more symptoms. The
68
Depressive Symptoms Subscale is composed of five items (e.g., “Feeling of
worthlessness”). The Anxiety Subscale is composed of five items as well (e.g., “Having
urges to break or smash things”). The Depressive Symptoms (α = 0.90) and Anxiety
Symptoms Subscales had adequate reliability (α = 0.87)
Risky Sexual Behaviors. The Risky Sexual Behavior questions were developed
for a study examining emerging adults’ experiences with risky sexual behavior
longitudinally (Lam & Lefkowitz, 2013). The two items are “In the past 12 weeks, how
frequently did you use a condom when you had sex?”, which will be referred to as Risky
Sex Q1, and “In the past 12 weeks, how frequently did you consume alcohol before or
during sexual encounters?”, which will be referred to as Risky Sex Q2. Both questions
were answered on a five-point Likert scale from (0) never to (4) every time. The two
items were not combined, and each question was assessed separately (Lam & Lefkowitz,
2013).
Results
Power
An a priori power analysis was conducted with the R package semPower, using α
= .05 and power level at .80. A minimum sample size of 279 was required to detect a
misfit of .04 which was considered an indicator of good model fit (Hu & Bentler, 1999;
Moshagen, 2018). The total sample size of 563 was large enough to detect effects.
Analytic strategy.
The hypothesized paths are presented in Figure 1. Cyber dating abuse
victimization at T1 was expected to positively relate to sexual risk taking, depression
symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and alcohol use at T2. Latinx cultural orientation at T1
69
was also included in the model as predictor of cyber dating abuse victimization at T2. It
was hypothesized that Latinx cultural orientation would serve as a protective factor for
later victimization.
All analysis were conducted using R software version 4.1.0 with Lavaan package
(R Core Team, 2020; Rosseel, 2012). The hypothesized paths were tested with a
Structural Equation Model (SEM). SEM is ideal for statistical inferences given its ability
to test multivariate pathways simultaneously and its ability to test autoregressive effects
(Kline, 2015, Selig & Little, 2016). Psych package was used to examine nonnormality
within the data (Rosseel, 2012). Given that data was nonnormal, maximum likelihood
with robust standard error estimator was used to account for parameter bias caused by
nonnormality (Revelle, 2004). Full information maximum likelihood was added to the
model because it produces better parameter estimates over traditional deletion strategies
(Kline, 2010). To determine model fit, the following statistics were considered: root-
mean-square error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual
(SRMR), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), and the Comparative Fit Index (CFI). The threshold
for good model fit was based on these criterias: RMSEA< .08, SRMR < .08, TFI > .95,
CFI > .95 to determine acceptable model fit (Hoyle, 2012; Hu & Bentler, 1999; Kline,
2015). Chi square test of model fit is reported but given less weight to these other fit
statistics since its statistical significance is largely based on sample size (Yuan & Bentler,
2000).
Structural Model
Global fit statistics were within the threshold of acceptable model fit, RMSEA =
.039 with 90% confidence intervals inside acceptable parameters (.027 < RMSEA CL90
70
< .050), SRMR = .06, CFI = .967, TLI = .926. Modification indices were explored, and
the recommended theoretically driven pathways were included in the model. Specifically,
risky sex as proxied by condom efficacy and alcohol use at T1 were included as
predictors of alcohol use prior to sex at T2. Additionally, alcohol use prior to sex at T1
was included as a predictor for alcohol use at T2. Model fit slightly improved: RMSEA
= 0.038, SRMR = .06, CFI = .96 TLI = .909.
Model Effects
The autoregressive effects were all significant which indicated that the constructs
measured were stable across time (Selig & Little, 2012). Latinx cultural orientation at
Time 1 was not significantly associated with cyber dating abuse victimization at Time 2;
thus hypothesis 1 was not supported. Analysis also indicated that there was no
relationship between cyber dating abuse victimization at T1 with sexual risk taking at T2,
depressive symptoms at T2, anxiety symptoms at T2, and alcohol use atT2. Hypothesis 2
was therefore not supported. SEM parameter estimates are presented in Table 7.
Table 7
Study 2 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation Model
Path Lower. Upper.

Predictor DV SE * p
Values CI CI
LOS T1 Psych CDA T2 0.33 0.22 0.14 -0.11 0.77
Age Psych CDA T2 0.00 0.04 .78 -0.08 0.06
Income Psych CDA T2 0.05 0.07 0.53 -0.09 0.18
Generation Psych CDA T2 0.04 0.12 0.80 -0.26 0.20
Psych CDA T1 Psych CDA T2 0.25 0.09 * 0.00 0.08 0.43
Stalking CDA T1 Psych CDA T2 0.04 0.04 0.30 -0.04 0.12
Sexual CDA T1 Psych CDA T2 -0.15 0.31 0.64 -0.75 0.46
LOS T1 Stalking CDA T2 0.94 0.61 0.12 -0.25 2.13
Age Stalking CDA T2 0.10 0.11 0.33 -0.10 0.31
Income Stalking CDA T2 -0.14 0.16 0.38 -0.45 0.17
Generation Stalking CDA T2 -0.14 0.31 0.65 -0.76 0.47
71
Psych CDA T1 Stalking CDA T2 0.30 0.34 0.37 -0.36 0.96
Stalking CDA T1 Stalking CDA T2 0.24 0.12 * 0.04 0.01 0.48
Sexual CDA T1 Stalking CDA T2 1.87 1.25 0.14 -0.59 4.33
LOS T1 Sexual CDA T2 -0.08 0.10 0.43 -0.28 0.12
Age Sexual CDA T2 -0.01 0.01 0.39 -0.04 0.02
Income Sexual CDA T2 -0.02 0.01 * 0.02 -0.04 0.00
Generation Sexual CDA T2 0.01 0.02 0.74 -0.04 0.06
Psych CDA T1 Sexual CDA T2 0.00 0.01 0.90 -0.02 0.02
Stalking CDA T1 Sexual CDA T2 0.00 0.00 0.56 -0.01 0.00
Sexual CDA T1 Sexual CDA T2 0.18 0.05 * 0.00 0.08 0.28
Age Risky Sex Q1 T2 -0.01 0.01 0.45 -0.03 0.01
Income Risky Sex Q1 T2 0.03 0.01 * 0.02 -0.06 0.00
Generation Risky Sex Q1 T2 0.03 0.03 0.22 -0.02 0.09
Psych CDA T1 Risky Sex Q1 T2 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.01 0.02
Stalking CDA T1 Risky Sex Q1 T2 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.01
Sexual CDA T1 Risky Sex Q1 T2 -0.03 0.02 0.18 -0.07 0.01
Age Risky Sex Q2 T2 -0.01 0.01 0.45 -0.03 0.01
Income Risky Sex Q2 T2 -0.03 0.01 * 0.02 -0.06 0.00
Generation Risky Sex Q2 T2 0.03 0.03 0.22 -0.02 0.09
Psych CDA T1 Risky Sex Q2 T2 0.01 0.01 0.27 0.00 0.02
Stalking CDA T1 Risky Sex Q2 T2 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.00 0.00
Sexual CDA T1 Risky Sex Q2 T2 -0.03 0.02 0.18 -0.01 0.01
Risky Sex Q1 T1 Risky Sex Q2 T2 0.40 0.06 * 0.00 0.28 0.52
AUDIT_sum_T1 Risky Sex Q2 T2 0.01 0.01 0.33 -0.01 0.03
Age Depression T2 -0.11 0.11 0.33 -0.32 0.1
Income Depression T2 0.07 0.13 0.61 -0.19 0.33
Generation Depression T2 0.38 0.2 0.13 -0.11 0.86
Psych CDA T1 Depression T2 0.05 0.08 0.49 -0.10 0.20
Stalking CDA T1 Depression T2 -0.01 0.02 0.83 -0.05 0.04
Sexual CDA T1 Depression T2 -0.02 0.27 0.96 -0.52 0.55
Age Anxiety T2 0.06 0.09 0.52 -0.12 0.23
Income Anxiety T2 0.13 0.11 0.22 -0.08 0.34
Generation Anxiety T2 0.12 0.19 0.53 -0.25 0.49
Psych CDA T1 Anxiety T2 0.05 0.07 0.46 -0.08 0.18
Stalking CDA T1 Anxiety T2 -0.01 0.02 0.72 -0.05 0.03
Sexual CDA T1 Anxiety T2 -0.18 0.22 0.41 -0.61 0.25
Age Alcohol T2 0.03 0.06 0.60 -0.09 0.15
Income Alcohol T2 0.00 0.09 1.00 -0.17 0.17
Generation Alcohol T2 -0.15 0.13 0.25 -0.39 0.10
Psych CDA T1 Alcohol T2 0.02 0.04 0.50 -0.05 0.10
Stalking CDA T1 Alcohol T2 -0.01 0.01 0.58 -0.03 0.02
Sexual CDA T1 Alcohol T2 0.38 0.26 0.13 -0.12 0.89
LOS T1 LOS T2 0.80 0.04 * 0.00 0.72 0.87
Generation LOS T2 -0.09 0.02 * 0.00 -0.13 -0.05
Note. * denotes p < .05
72
Polyvictimization
Table 8 demonstrates the relationship between cyber dating abuse victimization
by in-person dating abuse victimization. Chi square analysis indicated different patterns
of associations by violence types. Psychological cyber dating abuse at T1 was positively
associated with psychological aggression at T1, X2(1) = 42.366, p < .001, and at follow
up, X2(1) = 11.26, p < .001. Stalking cyber dating abuse at T1 was positively related to
psychological aggression, X2(1) = 42.34, physical abuse, X2 (1) = 52.852, p < .001, and
verbal sexual coercion, X2(1) = 5.91, p = .015, at T1, and later psychological aggression,
X2(1) = 25.725, p < .001. Sexual cyber dating abuse at T1 was related to psychological
aggression, X2(1) = 9.6288, p = .001, physical abuse, X2(1) = 42.502, p > .001, at T1. This
type of cyber dating abuse was also positively associated with psychological aggression,
X2(1) = 5.99, p = .01, sexual abuse, X2(1) = 17.173, p > .001, and physical abuse, X2(1) =
7.74, p = .005, at T2. The most notable difference in proportion is between stalking cyber
dating abuse and verbal sexual coercion. Individuals who reported sexual cyber dating
abuse were 17 time more likely to report verbal sexual coercion at baseline.
Table 8.
Study 2 Percent of Cyber Dating Abuse Victims That Reported In-Person Victimization
In-Person Victimization Type of CDA X2
No Psychological CDA T1 Psychological CDA T1
Psychological Aggression T1 3.79 18.95 42.37 *
Physical Abuse T1 11.82 10.91 28.14 *
Sexual Abuse T1 13.31 9.38 18.50 *
Verbal Sexual Coercion T1 1.25 21.51 3.11
Physical Abuse T2 14.54 8.16 8.93 *
Sexual Abuse T2 16.55 6.34 1.28
No Stalking CDA T1 Stalking CDA T1
73
Physical Abuse T1 16.61 16.24 52.85 *
Sexual Abuse T1 19.31 13.81 25.84 *
Verbal Sexual Coercion T1 1.8 30.94 5.91 *
Sexual Abuse T2 22.89 9.51 3.46
Verbal Sexual Coercion T2 2.5 30 1.35
No Sexual CDA T1 Sexual CDA T1
Sexual Abuse T1 2.53 5.42 40.78
Sexual Abuse T2 4.23 5.28 17.17 *
Discussion
The findings of this study provide insight to cyber dating abuse victimization
among Latina women. To date, the cyber dating abuse literature with racial/ethnic
minority samples is scarce. To the author’s knowledge only three studies exist in the
literature that focus specifically on Latinx samples (Cano-Gonzalez et al., 2020; Cantu et
al., 2020; Reed et al., 2020). This study found that 41.77% (n = 231/533) of Latina
women in emerging adulthood experienced cyber dating abuse victimization. When
examined within the different dimensions of this abuse, 22.76% (n = 127/558) reported
psychological, 32.73% (n = 182/556) reported stalking, and 7.91% (n = 44/556) reported
sexual cyber dating abuse. Reed and colleagues (2020) found a similar pattern. A greater
proportion of Latinx youth experienced nonsexual forms of cyber dating abuse, i.e., direct
aggression and monitoring, than sexual cyber dating abuse. The same pattern was also
found for cyber dating abuse perpetration in a sample of Latinx emerging adults (Cano-
74
Gonzalez et al., 2020). In conjunction, the findings from this study and these
aforementioned studies provide insight to the pattern of cyber dating abuse prevalence
rates. However, nationally representative studies are warranted to get a more reliable
pattern of cyber dating abuse experience within the Latinx community.
Another novel contribution to this study was the examination of acculturation,
specifically Latinx cultural orientation, as a predictor for later cyber dating abuse
victimization. No association was found to support Latinx cultural orientation as
protective against cyber dating abuse victimization. Given this null finding, there are a
couple considerations. First, the measure of Latinx cultural orientation is composed of
items mainly tied to language (Cuéllar et al., 1995), as such the unique characteristics of
Latinx culture were not captured directly. Future research situating Latinx cultural
orientation should consider adding measures that capture specific constructs on Latinx
culture, including but not limited to familism, family support, respeto, fatalism,
machismo, caballerismo, and marianismo, in addition to the Latinx cultural orientation
sub scale (Arciniega et al., 2008; Castillo et al., 2010; Díaz et al., 2014; Hernández &
Bámaca-Colbert, 2016; Steidel et al., 2003). Second, the Latinx community in the United
States is composed of different heterogenous subgroups (Berdahl et al., 2009; Roth et al.,
2020). The heterogeneity among Latinx subgroup is not only tied to nation of origin, but
it also includes their experiences from the receiving culture, migration history, and
differential United States policies targeting certain Latinx groups (Berdahl et al., 2009;
Cooper et al., 2020, Durand & Massey, 2019; Garcini et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2019).
These multilevel contextual factors play a role in the acculturative process among Latinx
subgroups (Roth et al., 2020). Therefore, it is recommended that future studies examining
75
the role of Latinx cultural orientation and IPV should consider recruiting enough sub
samples of Latinx groups and incorporating a latent variable of the acculturation process
to ensure that this complex construct is measured with certain validity (Roth et al., 2020).
An unexpected finding was that there was no temporal association between cyber
dating abuse victimization and negative health outcomes, i.e., mental health and alcohol
use. The longitudinal association between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental
health outcomes has been assessed by other researchers (Lu et al., 2018). Consistent with
this study’s null finding, Lu et al., (2018) also found no association between victimization
and negative mental health outcomes. Lu and colleagues (2018) implemented a one-year
time gap between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental health. Given that this
study had a much shorter time lag of three months, perhaps a longitudinal design that
captured more frequent and shorter moments, like a daily diary study, would be better
suited for the examination of cyber dating abuse and negative health outcomes (Dardis et
al., 2020; Shorey et al., 2014; Shorey et al., 2016; Waterman et al., 2021).
The lack of temporal association between cyber dating abuse victimization and
negative well-being could also be attributed to the internal validity threat of history effect
(Shadish et al., 2002; Lavrakas, 2008). The timing for data collection also overlapped
with the initial stages of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the United States.
County wide stay at home orders and virtual learning was implemented by the university
hosting this study (Piquero et al., 2021). Even at the end of the final wave of data
collection the catastrophic effects of COVID-19 pandemic were still ongoing (CDC,
2021). The effects between victimization and negative mental health captured in this
study could have been confounded by the greater global crisis at hand. In fact, empirical
76
evidence indicates that the pandemic worsened the experience of partner abuse by victims
of IPV (Agüero, 2021; Evans & Ferreira, 2020; McLay, 2021). The stay-at-home orders
created an environment where victims were quarantined with their abusers and limiting
their access to support services (Agüero, 2021; Evans & Ferreira, 2020; Roesch et al.,
2020; Slakoff et al., 2020). These conditions increased the opportunity for further
violence (Bullinger et al., 2020; Evans et al., 2020; Lyons & Brewer, 2021; McLay
2021).
Therefore, another consideration is potential bias in participant self-selection into
the study. Although the sample represents Latina women in emerging adulthood, it does
not reflect all Latina women within this developmental stage group. Additionally, the
sample is university enrolled and represents one spectrum of socio-economic status.
There are important qualitative differences between college enrolled emerging adults and
non-college enrolled (Henrich et al., 2010). The women who completed the survey were
able to do so, most likely, without fear of repercussions or violence for their responses, or
constant surveillance from living in the same space as their abusers. Thus, not
representing the group of women most at risk for IPV during the pandemic. Given this
study’s findings and COVID-19 pandemic related circumstances, future studies focused
on the health outcomes of cyber dating abuse victimization should extend recruitment
outside of the college setting and into community-based samples to capture a diversity of
lived experiences.
This study also investigated the relationship between in person sexual risk taking
and cyber dating abuse victimization. Findings indicated a null relationship between
sexually risky behaviors and victimization. As previously stated, data collection for both
77
time points overlapped with the reorganization of how society functioned within virtual
spaces, like the widespread movement of educational systems to remote learning and the
closing of social spaces (Oster et al., 2021). This could have impacted the sexual risk-
taking findings in this study because of the new norm of social distancing (Cato et al.,
2020).
An expected finding was the positive relationship between cyber dating abuse
victimization and in-person dating abuse, which is consistent with previous studies. For
example, Reed and colleagues (2020) conducted a cross sectional study of cyber dating
abuse among Latinx adolescents, and consistent with this study, in person forms of abuse
were positively correlated with online forms of abuse. Unique to this study was that the
association between violence types was able to be tested across time. This further
strengthens the polyvictimization research, which advocates for the understanding of
violence types as interrelated and not as isolated domains (Grych & Swan, 2012; Krebs et
al., 2011). This has important implications for prevention and intervention efforts aimed
at reducing IPV (Krebs et al., 2011). Programmatic efforts aimed at increasing healthy
romantic relationships among young adults should incorporate different dating abuse
types.
Limitations
Although the findings of this study contribute uniquely to the cyber dating abuse
literature, these findings should be situated within its methodological limitations. The
implementation of a two-time point design limits the ability to make inferences about
growth trajectories. In comparison to a panel model, a growth curve model can provide a
more nuanced understanding about inter and intra individual differences across time
78
(Laursen et al., 2012). Additionally, the use of quantitative methods limits the amount of
information that could be gathered from participants to contextualize their experience
with cyber dating abuse. A mixed methodological approach would have provided
additional information to help understand the relationship between Latinx cultural
orientation, abuse, and health outcomes (Byman, 2006; Trafimow, 2016).
Conclusions
This study contributes to the literature by providing foundational evidence to
understand cyber dating abuse among Latina women. Nationwide surveillance of risk
behaviors like the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System or the National Intimate
Partner and Sexual Violence Survey should consider integrating technological modalities
for violence (Basile et al., 2011; CDC, 2019). Also, this study echoes findings from other
violence prevention researchers about abuse dynamics, where different abuse typologies
co-occur (Grych & Swan, 2012; Krebs et al., 2011). This can inform future programmatic
efforts to support survivors of relationship abuse.
79
REFERENCES
Acevedo, M. J. (2000). Battered Immigrant Mexican women’s perspectives regarding abuse

and help-seeking. Journal of Multicultural Social Work, 8(3–4), 243–282.
https://doi.org/10.1300/J285v08n03_04
Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D., Chavez-Korell, S., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2014). U.S.

Latinas/os’ Ethnic Identity: Context, Methodological Approaches, and Considerations
Across the Life Span. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(2), 154–169.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000013476959
Adames, H. Y., Chavez-Dueñas, N. Y., & Jernigan, M. M. (2021). The fallacy of a raceless
Latinidad: Action guidelines for centering Blackness in Latinx psychology. Journal of
Latinx Psychology, 9(1), 26–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000179
Ahmad, F. B., Cisewski, J. A., Miniño, A., & Anderson, R. N. (2021). Provisional Mortality
Data — United States, 2020. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 70(14).
https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7014e1
Ahmadabadi, Z., Najman, J. M., Williams, G. M., Clavarino, A. M., d’Abbs, P., & Smirnov,
A. (2019). Intimate partner violence in emerging adulthood and subsequent substance use
disorders: findings from a longitudinal study. Addiction, 114(7), 1264–1273.
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14592
Ahrens, C. E., Rios-Mandel, L. C., Isas, L., & del Carmen Lopez, M. (2010). Talking about
interpersonal violence: Cultural Influences on Latinas’ identification and disclosure of
sexual assault and intimate partner violence. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research,
Practice, and Policy, 2(4), 284–295. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0018605
Ai, A. L., Aisenberg, E., Weiss, S. I., & Salazar, D. (2014). Racial/Ethnic Identity and
Subjective Physical and Mental Health of Latino Americans: An Asset Within? American
Journal of Community Psychology, 53(1–2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-
014-9635-5
Alcalde, M. C. (2010). Violence across borders: Familism, hegemonic masculinity, and self-
sacrificing femininity in the lives of Mexican and Peruvian migrants. Latino Studies,
8(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1057/lst.2009.44
80
Ali, P. A., Dhingra, K., & McGarry, J. (2016). A literature review of intimate partner violence
and its classifications. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 31, 16–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2016.06.008
Allem, J. P., Sussman, S., & Unger, J. B. (2017). The Revised Inventory of the Dimensions of
Emerging Adulthood (IDEA-R) and Substance Use Among College Students. Evaluation
and the Health Professions, 40(4), 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278716660742
Almeida, J., Molnar, B. E., Kawachi, I., & Subramanian, S. v. (2009). Ethnicity and nativity
status as determinants of perceived social support: Testing the concept of familism.
Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.02.029
Alvarez, C., Fernández María, L., Hopkins Bloomberg, J., & Sabri, B. (2018). Latina and
Caribbean Immigrant Women’s Experiences With Intimate Partner Violence: A Story of
Ambivalent Sexism Charvonne N Holliday. Article in Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518777006
Alvarez, M. J., Ramirez, S. O., Frietze, G., Field, C., & Zárate, M. A. (2020). A Meta-
Analysis of Latinx Acculturation and Intimate Partner Violence. In Trauma, Violence,
and Abuse (Vol. 21, Issue 4, pp. 844–854). SAGE Publications Ltd.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018801327
Armenta, B. E., & Hunt, J. S. (2009). Responding to Societal Devaluation: Effects of

Perceived Responding to Societal Devaluation: Effects of Perceived Personal and Group
Discrimination on the Ethnic Group Personal and Group Discrimination on the Ethnic
Group Identification and Personal Self-Esteem of Latino/Latina Identification and
Personal Self-Esteem of Latino/Latina Adolescents Adolescents Part of the Psychiatry
and Psychology Commons. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 12(1), 23–39.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208098775
Arnett, J. J. (2011). (2011) Emerging adulthood (s): The cultural psychology of a new life
stage.
Arnett, J. J., Žukauskienė, R., & Sugimura, K. (2014). Adolescent mental health 3 The new
life stage of emerging adulthood at ages 18-29 years: implications for mental health. In
Elsevier. www.thelancet.com/psychiatry
81
Basile, K. C., Black, M. C., Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2011). National
intimate partner and sexual violence survey; 2010 summary report.
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11637
Basile, K. C., Black, M. C., Breiding, M. J., Chen, J., & Merrick, M. T. (2011). National
intimate partner and sexual violence survey; 2010 summary report.
https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/11637
Bauer, H. M., Gibson, P., Hernandez, M., Kent, C., Klausner, J., & Bolan, G. (n.d.). Intimate
Partner Violence and High-Risk Sexual Behaviors Among Female Patients with Sexually
Transmitted Diseases. In journals.lww.com.
https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2002/07000/Intimate_Partner_Violence_and
_High_Risk_Sexual.9.aspx
Beas, V. N. (2009). Exploring intimate partner violence and psychological abuse among
latinas. http://search.proquest.com/openview/27f9e871f8bac5651f58f83980f4d91d/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Bennett, D. C., Guran, E. L., … M. C. R.-V. and, & 2011, undefined. (n.d.). College students’
electronic victimization in friendships and dating relationships: Anticipated distress and
associations with risky behaviors. Connect.Springerpub.Com.
https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrvv/26/4/410
Berdahl, T. A., & Torres Stone, R. A. (2009). Examining latino differences in mental
healthcare use: The roles of acculturation and attitudes towards healthcare. Community
Mental Health Journal, 45(5), 393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9231-6
Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 5–

34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x
Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., ... & Stevens, M.
(2011). National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report.
Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Calvete, E. (2015). Cyber dating abuse: Prevalence,
context, and relationship with offline dating aggression. Psychological Reports, 116(2),
565–585. https://doi.org/10.2466/21.16.PR0.116k22w4
82
Borrajo, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., Pereda, N., & Calvete, E. (2015). The development and
validation of the cyber dating abuse questionnaire among young couples. Computers in
Human Behavior, 48, 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2015.01.063
Bowleg, L. (2012). The problem with the phrase women and minorities: Intersectionality-an
important theoretical framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health,
102(7), 1267–1273. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2012.300750
Breiding, M. J., Basile, K. C., Klevens, J., & Smith, S. G. (2017). Economic Insecurity and
Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Victimization. American Journal of Preventive
Medicine, 53(4), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2017.03.021
Breiding, M. J., Black, M. C., & Ryan, G. W. (2008). Prevalence and Risk Factors of Intimate
Partner Violence in Eighteen U.S. States/Territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med, 34(2), 112–
118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2007.10.001
Breiding, M., Basile, K. C., Smith, S. G., Black, M. C., & Mahendra, R. R. (2015). Intimate
partner violence surveillance: Uniform definitions and recommended data elements.
Version 2.0.
Brem, M. J., Florimbio, A. R., … H. G.-P. of, & 2019, undefined. (n.d.). Cyber abuse among
men arrested for domestic violence: Cyber monitoring moderates the relationship
between alcohol problems and intimate partner violence. Psycnet.Apa.Org.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037/vio0000130
Brown, C., & Hegarty, K. (2018). Digital dating abuse measures: A critical review.
Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2018.03.003
Brown, C., Sanci, L., & Hegarty, K. (2021). Technology-facilitated abuse in relationships:
Victimisation patterns and impact in young people. Computers in Human Behavior, 124,
106897. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.106897
Butchart, A., Cerdá, M., Villaveces, A., & Sminkey, L. (2002). World Health Organization
Department of Injuries and Violence Prevention Non-communicable Diseases and
Mental Health Framework for Interpersonal Violence Prevention Framework
Development Document.
83
Caetano Craig Field Suhasini Ramisetty-mikler Christine Mcgrath, R. A., Caetano, R., &
Hines Blvd, H. (2005). The 5-Year Course of Intimate Partner Violence Among White,
Black, and Hispanic Couples in the United States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence,
20(9), 1039–1057. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260505277783
Caetano, R., McGrath, C., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & Field, C. A. (2005). Drinking, alcohol
problems and the five-year recurrence and incidence of male to female and female to
male partner violence. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(1), 98–106.
https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000150015.84381.63
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., & McGrath, C. (2004). Acculturation, Drinking, and
Intimate Partner Violence among Hispanic Couples in the United States: A Longitudinal
Study. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26(1), 60–78.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303261812
Caetano, R., Ramisetty-Mikler, S., Caetano Vaeth, P. A., & Harris, T. R. (2007).
Acculturation stress, drinking, and intimate partner violence among hispanic couples in
the U.S. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(11), 1431–1447.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260507305568
Caetano, R., Schafer, J., Clark, C. L., Cunradi, C. B., & Raspberry, K. (2000). Intimate partner
violence, acculturation, and alcohol consumption among Hispanic couples in the United
States. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(1), 30–45.
https://doi.org/10.1177/088626000015001003
Cafferky, B. M., Mendez, M., … J. R. A.-P. of, & 2018, undefined. (n.d.). Substance use and
intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Psycnet.Apa.Org.
https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/2016-44359-001
Caldwell, J. E., Swan, S. C., & Woodbrown, V. D. (2011). Gender Differences in Intimate
Partner Violence Outcomes. Psycnet.Apa.Org. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026296
Calzada, E. J., Tamis-Lemonda, C. S., & Yoshikawa, H. (n.d.). Familismo in Mexican and
Dominican Families From Low-Income, Urban Communities. Journal of Family Issues,
34(12), 1696–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X12460218
84
Camacho, A. (2009). Factors influencing intimate partner violence among college Latinas.
http://search.proquest.com/openview/116414c2d32d8918c2cee1409d57a9e7/1?pq-
origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
Campbell, J. C., Baty, M. L., Ghandour, R. M., Stockman, J. K., Francisco, L., & Wagman, J.
(2008). The intersection of intimate partner violence against women and HIV/AIDS: a
review. In International journal of injury control and safety promotion (Vol. 15, Issue 4,
pp. 221–231). https://doi.org/10.1080/17457300802423224
Campos, B., Schetter, C. D., … C. M. A.-C. D. and, & 2008, undefined. (n.d.). Familialism,
social support, and stress: Positive implications for pregnant Latinas. Psycnet.Apa.Org.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-04404-009
Cano, M. Á., Castro, Y., de Dios, M. A., Schwartz, S. J., Lorenzo-Blanco, E. I., Roncancio, A.
M., Martinez, M. J., Sheehan, D. M., Auf, R., Piña-Watson, B., Huynh, Q. L., &
Zamboanga, B. L. (2016). Associations of ethnic discrimination with symptoms of
anxiety and depression among Hispanic emerging adults: a moderated mediation model.
Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 29(6), 699–707.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2016.1157170
Cano-Gonzalez, I., Charak, R., Gilbar, O., Viñas-Racionero, R., & Strait, M. K. (n.d.).
Witnessing Parental Violence and Cyber IPV Perpetration in Hispanic Emerging Adults:
The Mediating Role of Attitudes Toward IPV. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520975834
Cardenas, I. (2020). Advancing intersectionality approaches in intimate partner violence

research: a social justice approach. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313204.2020.1855494
Caridade, S., Braga, T., & Borrajo, E. (2019). Cyber dating abuse (CDA): Evidence from a
systematic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 48, 152–168.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2019.08.018
Carlson, R. G., & Jones, K. D. (n.d.). Addictions and Offender Issues Continuum of Conflict
and Control: A Conceptualization of Intimate Partner Violence Typologies.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480710371795
Castillo, L. G., Perez, F. v, Castillo, R., & Ghosheh, M. R. (2010). Counselling Psychology
Quarterly Construction and initial validation of the Marianismo Beliefs Scale.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09515071003776036
85
Cheref, S., Talavera, D., & Walker, R. L. (2019). Perceived Discrimination and Suicide
Ideation: Moderating Roles of Anxiety Symptoms and Ethnic Identity among Asian
American, African American, and Hispanic Emerging Adults. Suicide and Life-
Threatening Behavior, 49(3), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12467
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2015). Toward a Field of Intersectionality Studies:
Theory, Applications, and Praxis. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/669608, 38(4), 785–810.
https://doi.org/10.1086/669608
Christensen, M. C., Caswell, C., & Hernández, M. F. (n.d.). Contextualizing Barriers to Help-
Seeking After Sexual Violence: A Critical Feminist Study With Latinx College Women.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109920906782
Chun, H., Marin, M. R., Schwartz, J. R., Pham, A., & Castro-Olivo, S. M. (2016).
Psychosociocultural Structural Model of College Success among Latina/o Students in
Hispanic-Serving Institutions. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 9(4), 385–400.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039881
Coker, A. L. (2007). Does physical intimate partner violence affect sexual health?: A
systematic review. In Trauma, Violence, and Abuse (Vol. 8, Issue 2, pp. 149–177).
https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007301162
Cook, T., Campbell, D., & Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs
for generalized causal inference.
https://www.alnap.org/system/files/content/resource/files/main/147.pdf
Cooper, D. K., Bachem, R., Meentken, M. G., Aceves, L., & Perez Barrios, A. G. (2020).
Cumulative lifetime adversity and depression among a national sample of U.S. Latinx
immigrants: Within-group differences in risk and protective factors using data from the
HCHS/SOL sociocultural ancillary study. Journal of Latinx Psychology, 8(3), 202–220.
https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000145
Crenshaw, K. (1993). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence
Against Women of Color.
Cuellar, I., Arnold, B., & Maldonado, R. (1995). Acculturation Rating Scale for Mexican
Americans-II: A Revision of the Original ARSMA Scale. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral
Sciences, 17(3), 275–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863950173001
86
Cuevas, C. A., Bell, K. A., & Sabina, C. (2014). Victimization, psychological distress, and
help-seeking: Disentangling the relationship for Latina victims. Psychology of Violence,
4(2), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035819
Cuevas, C. A., Sabina, C., & Picard, E. H. (2010). Interpersonal victimization patterns and
psychopathology among latino women: Results from the SALAS study. Psychological
Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 2(4), 296–306.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020099
Cuevas, C., & Sabina, C. (2010). Sexual Assault Among Latinas (SALAS) Study.
https://ncvc.dspacedirect.org/handle/20.500.11990/374
Cunradi, C. B. (2009). Intimate Partner Violence Among Hispanic Men and Women: The
Role of Drinking, Neighborhood Disorder, and Acculturation-Related Factors. Violence
and Victims, 24(1), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.24.1.83
Curry, T. R., Morales, M. C., Zavala, E., & Hernandez, J. L. (2018). Why is Family Violence
Lower Among Mexican Immigrants? The Protective Features of Mexican Culture.
Journal of Family Violence 2018 33:3, 33(3), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10896-
017-9947-Y
Dardis, C. M., Murphy, M. J., Violence, A. C. B.-P. of, & 2016, undefined. (n.d.). An
investigation of the tenets of social norms theory as they relate to sexually aggressive
attitudes and sexual assault perpetration: A comparison of men and their friends.
Psychology of Violence, 6(1), 163.
de Santis, J. P., Provencio-Vasquez, E., & Mancera, B. (2016). Health risk and protective
factors among hispanic women living in the U.S.-Mexico border region. Hispanic Health
Care International, 14(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540415316629679
Dennis, J. M., Fonseca, A. L., Gutierrez, G., Shen, J., & Salazar, S. (2016). Bicultural
Competence and the Latino 2.5 Generation: The Acculturative Advantages and
Challenges of Having One Foreign-Born and One U.S.-Born Parent. Hispanic Journal of
Behavioral Sciences, 38(3), 341–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986316653594
87
Derrick, J. L., & Testa, M. (2017). Temporal effects of perpetrating or receiving intimate
partner aggression on alcohol consumption: A daily diary study of community couples.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 78(2), 213–221.
https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2017.78.213
Devries, K. M., Child, J. C., Bacchus, L. J., Mak, J., Falder, G., Graham, K., Watts, C., &
Heise, L. (2014). Intimate partner violence victimization and alcohol consumption in
women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. In Addiction (Vol. 109, Issue 3, pp. 379–
391). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12393
Diaz, T., Studies, N. H. B.-J. of H., & 2017, undefined. (n.d.). Subjective well-being in
Mexican and Mexican American women: The role of acculturation, ethnic identity,
gender roles, and perceived social support. Springer.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10902-016-9741-1.pdf
Dick, R. N., McCauley, H. L., Jones, K. A., Pediatrics, D. J. T.-, & 2014, undefined. (n.d.).
Cyber dating abuse among teens using school-based health centers. Am Acad Pediatrics.
https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/134/6/e1560.short
Dixon, L., & Graham-Kevan, N. (2011). Understanding the nature and etiology of intimate
partner violence and implications for practice and policy. Clinical Psychology Review,
31(7), 1145–1155. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CPR.2011.07.001
Doucerain, M. M., Segalowitz, N., & Ryder, A. G. (2017). Acculturation measurement: From
simple proxies to sophisticated toolkit.
Duerksen, K. N., & Woodin, E. M. (2019). Cyber dating abuse victimization: Links with
psychosocial functioning. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(19-20), NP10077–
NP10105, https://doi.org/ 0886260519872982.
Durand, J., & Massey, D. S. (2019). Debacles on the Border: Five Decades of Fact-Free
Immigration Policy. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
684(1), 6–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519872982
Eaton, A. A., & Stephens, D. P. (2018). Adolescent dating violence among ethnically diverse
youth. In Adolescent Dating Violence: Theory, Research, and Prevention (pp. 233–260).
Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811797-2.00010-4
88
Eaton, A. A., Noori, S., Bonomi, A., Stephens, D. P., & Gillum, T. L. (2020). Nonconsensual
Porn as a Form of Intimate Partner Violence: Using the Power and Control Wheel to
Understand Nonconsensual Porn Perpetration in Intimate Relationships. Trauma,
Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838020906533
Eaton, A., Jacobs, H., & Ruvalcaba, Y. (2017). 2017 Nationwide Online Study of
Nonconsensual Porn Victimization and Perpetration.
https://ncvc.dspacedirect.org/handle/20.500.11990/1755
Edwards, M. C., Green, C., Best, U. E. P.-J. of K. and, & 2006, undefined. (n.d.). Teen dating
violence, ethnic identity and depression in inner city African American youths and young
adults. Academia.Edu.
https://www.academia.edu/download/35233792/M.Ward_JJParticle.pdf#page=43
Fair, C. D., & Vanyur, J. (2011). Sexual coercion, verbal aggression, and condom use
consistency among college students. Journal of American College Health, 59(4), 273–
280. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2010.508085
Faria, L. de. (2021). Intimate Partner Violence in Hispanic Communities. Intimate Partner
Violence, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55864-2_6
Fernet, M., Hébert, M., Brodeur, G., & Théorêt, V. (2019). “When You’re in a Relationship,
You Say No, but Your Partner Insists”: Sexual Dating Violence and Ambiguity Among
Girls and Young Women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519867149
Fisher, S., Zapolski, T. C., Sheehan, C., & Barnes-Najor, J. (2017). Pathway of protection:
Ethnic identity, self-esteem, and substance use among multiracial youth. Addictive
Behaviors, 72, 27-32.
Flach, R. M. D., & Deslandes, S. F. (2017). Cyber dating abuse in affective and sexual
relationships: a literature review. Cadernos de Saude Publica, 33(7), e00138516–
e00138516. https://doi.org/10.15090/0102-311X00138516
Flach, R. M. D., publica, S. F. D.-C. de saude, & 2017, undefined. (n.d.). Cyber dating abuse
in affective and sexual relationships: a literature review. SciELO Public Health.
https://www.scielosp.org/article/csp/2017.v33n7/e00138516/en/
89
Flanagan, J. C., Jaquier, V., … K. C. G.-P., & 2014, undefined. (n.d.). Examining the
prevalence, bidirectionality, and co-occurrence of sexual intimate partner violence among
women during pregnancy and postpartum. Connect.Springerpub.Com.
https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrpa/5/4/407
Flores, A. (2017). How the U.S. Hispanic Populations is Changing. Pew Research Center.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/09/18/how-the-u-s-hispanic-population-is-
changing/
Forster, M., Davis, L., Grigsby, T. J., Rogers, C. J., Vetrone, S. F., & Unger, J. B. (2019). The
Role of Familial Incarceration and Ethnic Identity in Suicidal Ideation and Suicide
Attempt: Findings from a Longitudinal Study of Latinx Young Adults in California.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 64(1–2), 191–201.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12332
Forster, M., Grigsby, T. J., Soto, D. W., Sussman, S. Y., & Unger, J. B. (2017). Perceived
discrimination, cultural identity development, and intimate partner violence among a
sample of Hispanic young adults. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology,
23(4), 576. https://doi.org/10.1037/CDP0000154
Fuchsel, C. L. M. (2013). Familism, Sexual Abuse, and Domestic Violence Among Immigrant
Mexican Women. Affilia, 28(4), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886109913503265
Garcia, L., Hurwitz, E. L., & Kraus, J. F. (2004). Acculturation and Reported Intimate Partner
Violence Among Latinas in Los Angeles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(5), 569–
590. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504271582
Garcini, L. M., Domenech Rodríguez, M. M., Mercado, A., & Paris, M. (2020). A tale of two
crises: The compounded effect of COVID-19 and anti-immigration policy in the United
States. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 12, S230–S232.
https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0000775
Gibson, M. A. (n.d.). Immigrant Adaptation and Patterns of Acculturation. JSTOR.

https://doi.org/10.1159/000057037
90
Gonzalez-Guarda, R. M., Cummings, A. M., Becerra, M., Fernandez, M. C., & Mesa, I.
(2013). Needs and preferences for the prevention of intimate partner violence among
hispanics: A community’s perspective. Journal of Primary Prevention, 34(4), 221–235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10935-013-0312-5
Gonzalez-Guarda, R. M., Ferranti, D., Halstead, V., & Ilias, V. M. (2016). Experiences with
Dating Violence and Help Seeking Among Hispanic Females in Their Late Adolescence.
Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 37(4), 229–238.
https://doi.org/10.3109/01612840.2016.1141341
González-Guarda, R. M., Florom-Smith, A. L., & Thomas, T. (2011). A Syndemic model of

substance abuse, intimate partner violence, HIV infection, and mental health among
hispanics. Public Health Nursing, 28(4), 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-
1446.2010.00928.x
Gonzalez-Guarda, R. M., Mccabe, B. E., Vermeesch, A. L., Cianelli, R., Florom-Smith, A. L.,
& Peragallo, N. (2012). Cultural phenomena and the syndemic factor: Substance abuse,
violence, hiv, and depression among hispanic women. Annals of Anthropological
Practice, 36(2), 212–231. https://doi.org/10.1111/napa.12001
Gonzalez-Guarda, R. M., Peragallo, N., Vasquez, E. P., Urrutia, M. T., & Mitrani, V. B.
(2009). Intimate partner violence, depression, and resource availability among a
community sample of hispanic women. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 30(4), 227–236.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840802701109
Gonzalez-Guarda, R. M., Vasquez, E. P., Urrutia, M. T., Villarruel, A. M., & Peragallo, N.
(2011). Hispanic Women’s Experiences With Substance Abuse, Intimate Partner
Violence, and Risk for HIV. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 22(1), 46–54.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1043659610387079
Graham, L. M., Ranapurwala, S. I., Zimmer, C., Macy, R. J., Rizo, C. F., Lanier, P., & Martin,
S. L. (2021). Disparities in potential years of life lost due to intimate partner violence:
Data from 16 states for 2006–2015. PLOS ONE, 16(2), e0246477.
https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0246477
Grest, C. V., Amaro, H., & Unger, J. (2017). Longitudinal Predictors of Intimate Partner
Violence Perpetration and Victimization in Latino Emerging Adults. Journal of Youth and
Adolescence 2017 47:3, 47(3), 560–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10964-017-0663-Y
91
Grest, C. V., Lee, J. O., Gilreath, T., & Unger, J. B. (2018). Latent Class Analysis of Intimate
Partner Violence Perpetration and Victimization among Latino Emerging Adults. Journal
of Youth and Adolescence, 47(3), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-017-0807-0
Grych, J., & Swan, S. (2012). Toward a more comprehensive understanding of interpersonal
violence: Introduction to the special issue on interconnections among different types of
violence. Psychology of Violence, 2(2), 105–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027616
Halpern-Meekin, S., Manning, W. D., Giordano, P. C., & Longmore, M. A. (2013).

Relationship Churning, Physical Violence, and Verbal Abuse in Young Adult
Relationships. Journal of Marriage and Family, 75(1), 2–12.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2012.01029.x
Harris, R. J., Firestone, J. M., & Vega, W. A. (2005). The interaction of country of origin,
acculturation, and gender role ideology on wife abuse. Social Science Quarterly, 86(2),
463-483.
Henry, N., & Powell, A. (2018). Technology-Facilitated Sexual Violence: A Literature

Review of Empirical Research. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 19(2), 195–208.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016650189
Hereth, J. (2021). “Where is the Safe Haven?” Transgender Women’s Experiences of

Victimization and Help-Seeking across the Life Course. Feminist Criminology.
https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211010951
Hernández, M. M., Robins, R. W., Widaman, K. F., & Conger, R. D. (2017). Ethnic pride,
self-esteem, and school belonging: A reciprocal analysis over time. Developmental
Psychology, 53(12), 2384–2396. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000434
Hertlein, K. M., Eddy, B. P., & Lancaster Strickland, M. (2020). Journal of Couple &
Relationship Therapy Innovations in Clinical and Educational Interventions A
Framework for Assessing Technology-Mediated IPV.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2020.1838377
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2011). Electronic dating violence: A brief guide for educators
and parents. Cyberbullying Research Center.
92
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling,
6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Jasinski, J. L. (1998). The role of acculturation in wife assault. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral
Sciences, 20(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863980202003
Jasinski, J. L., & Williams, L. M. E. (1998). Partner violence: A comprehensive review of 20

years of research. Sage Publications, Inc.
Johnson, W. L., Giordano, P. C., … W. D. M.-J. of youth and, & 2015, undefined. (n.d.). The
age–IPV curve: Changes in the perpetration of intimate partner violence during
adolescence and young adulthood. Springer.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10964-014-0158-z.pdf
Johnson, W. L., Giordano, P. C., Longmore, M. A., & Manning, W. D. (2014). Intimate
Partner Violence and Depressive Symptoms during Adolescence and Young Adulthood.
Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 55(1), 39–55.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146513520430
Jun, H.-J., Rich-Edwards, J. W., Boynton-Jarrett, R., & Wright, R. J. (2008). Intimate Partner
Violence and Cigarette Smoking: Association Between Smoking Risk and Psychological
Abuse With and Without Co-Occurrence of Physical and Sexual Abuse. American
Journal of Public Health, 98(3), 527–535. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2003.037663
Kast, N. R., Eisenberg, M. E., & Sieving, R. E. (2016). The role of parent communication and
connectedness in dating violence victimization among Latino adolescents. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 31(10), 1932-1955.
Kasturirangan, A., & Williams, E. N. (2003). Counseling Latina battered women: A

qualitative study of the Latina perspective. In Journal of Multicultural Counseling and
Development (Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 162–178). American Counseling Association.
https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1912.2003.tb00541.x
Kaysen, D., Dillworth, T. M., Simpson, T., … A. W.-A., & 2007, undefined. (n.d.). Domestic
violence and alcohol use: Trauma-related symptoms and motives for drinking. Elsevier.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460306002954
93
Kazak, A. E., Hwang, W. T., … F. F. C.-J. of pediatric, & 2018, undefined. (n.d.). Validation
of the Spanish version of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) in pediatric cancer.
Academic.Oup.Com. https://academic.oup.com/jpepsy/article-
abstract/43/10/1104/5047921
Khantzian, E. J. (1997). The self-medication hypothesis of substance use disorders: A

reconsideration and recent applications. In Harvard Review of Psychiatry (Vol. 4, Issue 5,
pp. 231–244). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
https://doi.org/10.3109/10673229709030550
Klevens, J., Shelley, G., Clavel-Arcas, C., Barney, D. D., Tobar, C., Duran, E. S., Barajas-
Mazaheri, R., & Esparza, J. (2007). Latinos’ Perspectives and Experiences With Intimate
Partner Violence. Violence Against Women, 13, 141–158.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206296980
Kline, R. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY:
Guilford Press.
Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New
York, NY: Guilford Press.
Knight, G. P., Gonzales, N. A., Saenz, D. S., Bonds, D. D., Germán, M., Deardorff, J.,
Roosav, M. W., & Updegraff, K. A. (2010). The Mexican American cultural values scale
for adolescents and adults. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30(3), 444–481.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431609338178
Krebs, C., Breiding, M. J., Browne, A., & Warner, T. (2011). The Association Between
Different Types of Intimate Partner Violence Experienced by Women. Journal of Family
Violence, 26(6), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-011-9383-3
la Flair, L. N., Bradshaw, C. P., Storr, C. L., Green, K. M., Alvanzo, A. A. H., & Crum, R. M.
(2012). Intimate partner violence and patterns of alcohol abuse and dependence criteria
among women: A latent class analysis. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73(3),
351–360. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.2012.73.351
94
Lam, C. B., & Lefkowitz, E. S. (2013). Risky sexual behaviors in emerging adults:
Longitudinal changes and within-person variations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(4),
523–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9959-x
Lavrakas, P. J. (2008). Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Sage.
Lee, B. A., & Martin, M. J. R. (2019). Whither the urban diaspora? The spatial redistribution
of Latino origin groups in metropolitan America since 1990. Journal of Urban Affairs,
41(7), 960–980. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2019.1565821
Lee, C., & Wong, J. S. (2020). Examining the effects of teen dating violence prevention
programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09442-x
Lee, J. Y., & Bame, S. I. (2020). Historical baseline case study of unmet shelter and housing
disaster needs throughout Texas: the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in Texas,
2005. Housing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/08882746.2020.1796119
Lévesque, S., Rodrigue, C., Vost, D. B. P., Blais, M., Boislard, M. A., & Lévy, J. J. (2016).
Intimate partner violence, sexual assault, and reproductive health among university
women. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 25(1), 9–20.
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.251-A5
Lewis, M. J., West, B., Bautista, L., & Greenberg, A. M. (2005). Perceptions of Service
Providers and Community Members on Intimate Partner Violence Within a Latino
Community. Perceptions of Partner ViolenceCaetano & Schafer.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104269510
Ligiéro, D. P., Fassinger, R., McCauley, M., Moore, J., & Lyytinen, N. (2009). Childhood
sexual abuse, culture, and coping: A qualitative study of Latinas. Psychology of Women
Quarterly, 33(1), 67-80.
Lindsay, M., Booth, J. M., Messing, J. T., & Thaller, J. (2016). Experiences of Online
Harassment Among Emerging Adults: Emotional Reactions and the Mediating Role of
Fear. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(19), 3174–3195.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515584344
95
Lu, Y., van Ouytsel, J., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., & Temple, J. R. (2018). Cross-sectional and
temporal associations between cyber dating abuse victimization and mental health and
substance use outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 65, 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.02.009
Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Goossens, L., Beyers, W., & Missotten, L. (2011). Processes of
Personal Identity Formation and Evaluation. In Handbook of Identity Theory and
Research (pp. 77–98). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7988-9_4
Lyons, M., & Brewer, G. (2021). Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence during Lockdown
and the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Family Violence 2021, 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S10896-021-00260-X
Macartney, S., Bishaw, A., & Fontenot, K. (2013). Poverty Rates for Selected Detailed Race
and Hispanic Groups by State and Place: 2007-2011. www.census.gov/acs/www
Madlock, P. E., & Westerman, D. (2011). Hurtful cyber-teasing and violence: Who’s laughing
out loud? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(17), 3542–3560.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260511403749
Marganski, A., & Fauth, K. (2013). Socially Interactive Technology and Contemporary
Dating: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Deviant Behaviors Among Young Adults in the
Modern, Evolving Technological World. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(4),
357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567713513797
Marganski, A., & Melander, L. (2018). Intimate Partner Violence Victimization in the Cyber
and Real World: Examining the Extent of Cyber Aggression Experiences and Its
Association With In-Person Dating Violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(7),
1071–1095. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515614283
Martinez, S., Torres, V., Wallace White, L., Medrano, C. I., Robledo, A. L., & Hernandez, E.
(2012). The Influence of Family Dynamics on Ethnic Identity Among Adult Latinas.
Journal of Adult Development, 19(4), 190–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-012-
9146-2
96
Martinez-Pecino, R., & Durán, M. (2019). I Love You but I Cyberbully You: The Role of
Hostile Sexism. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(4), 812–825.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516645817
Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., & Ellickson, P. L. (2005). Cross-lagged relationships between
substance use and intimate partner violence among a sample of young adult women.
Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(1), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2005.66.139
Maruish, M. E. (2004). The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes
assessment: Volume 3: Instruments for adults. Routledge.
Maruish, M. E., Bershadsky, B., & Goldstein, L. (1998). Reliability and Validity of the SA-45:
Further Evidence from a Primary Care Setting. Assessment, 5(4), 407–420.
https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119800500410
Melander, L. A. (2010). College students’ perceptions of intimate partner cyber harassment.

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(3), 263–268.
https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0221
Mennicke, A. (2019). Expanding and Validating a Typology of Intimate Partner Violence:

Intersections of Violence and Control Within Relationships. Violence Against Women,
25(4), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218780362
Minton, H., Mittal, M., Elder, H., Behavior, M. P. C.-A. and, & 2016, undefined. (n.d.).
Relationship factors and condom use among women with a history of intimate partner
violence. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10461-015-1189-5.pdf
Mittal, M., Senn, T. E., & Carey, M. P. (2012). Intimate partner violence and condom use
among women: Does the information-motivation-behavioral skills model explain sexual
risk behavior? AIDS and Behavior, 16(4), 1011–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-
011-9949-3
Miville, M. L., Mendez, N., & Louie, M. (2017). Latina/o gender roles: A content analysis of
empirical research from 1982 to 2013. In Journal of Latina/o Psychology (Vol. 5, Issue 3,
pp. 173–194). American Psychological Association Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1037/lat0000072
97
Morales, A., & Pérez, O. F. R. (2020). Marianismo. In The Wiley Encyclopedia of Personality
and Individual Differences. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118970843.ch306
Moshagen, M., & Auerswald, M. (2018). On congruence and incongruence of measures of fit
in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 23(2), 318.
Nowotny, K. M., & Graves, J. L. (2013). Substance Use and Intimate Partner Violence
Victimization Among White, African American, and Latina Women. Journal of
Interpersonal Violence, 28(17), 3301–3318. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513496903
Øverup, C. S., DiBello, A. M., Brunson, J. A., … L. K. A.-A., & 2015, undefined. (n.d.).
Drowning the pain: Intimate partner violence and drinking to cope prospectively predict
problem drinking. Elsevier.
Oxtoby, C. (2012). Taking a cultural perspective on intimate partner violence. Marquette

University.
Paat, Y. F., Markham, C., Trauma, M. P.-J. of C. & A., & 2019, undefined. (n.d.). Psycho-
emotional violence, its association, co-occurrence, and bidirectionality with cyber,
physical and sexual violence. Springer.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40653-019-00283-z.pdf
Peitzmeier, S. M., Malik, M., Kattari, S. K., Marrow, E., Stephenson, R., Agénor, M., &
Reisner, S. L. (n.d.). Intimate Partner Violence in Transgender Populations: Systematic
Review and Meta-analysis of Prevalence and Correlates.
https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020
Perreira, K. M., Marchante, A. N., Schwartz, S. J., Isasi, C. R., Carnethon, M. R., Corliss, H.
L., Kaplan, R. C., Santisteban, D. A., Vidot, D. C., Horn, L. van, & Delamater, A. M.
(2019). Stress and Resilience: Key Correlates of Mental Health and Substance Use in the
Hispanic Community Health Study of Latino Youth. Journal of Immigrant and Minority
Health, 21(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10903-018-0724-7
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A New Scale for Use with
Diverse Groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7(2), 156–176.
https://doi.org/10.1177/074355489272003
98
Phinney, J. S., & Ong, A. D. (2007). Conceptualization and Measurement of Ethnic Identity:
Current Status and Future Directions. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(3), 271–281.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.3.271
Phinney, J. S., Ong, A., & Madden, T. (2000). Cultural values and intergenerational value
discrepancies in immigrant and non‐immigrant families. Child development, 71(2), 528-
539.
Phinney, J. S., Cantu, C. lou, & Kurtz, D. A. (1997). Ethnic and American identity as
predictors of self-esteem among African American, Latino, and White adolescents.
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26(2), 165–185.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024500514834
Phinney, J. S., Horenczyk, G., Liebkind, K., & Vedder, P. (2001). Ethnic identity,
immigration, and well-being: An interactional perspective. Journal of Social Issues,
57(3), 493–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00225
Polanco-Roman, L., & Miranda, R. (2013). Culturally Related Stress, Hopelessness, and
Vulnerability to Depressive Symptoms and Suicidal Ideation in Emerging Adulthood.
Behavior Therapy, 44(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2012.07.002
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods,
40(3), 879–891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
Raghavan, C., Mennerich, A., Sexton, E., & James, S. E. (2006). Community violence and its
direct, indirect, and mediating effects on intimate partner violence. Violence Against
Women, 12(12), 1132–1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801206294115
Raghavan, C., Rajah, V., Gentile, K., Collado, L., & Kavanagh, A. M. (2009). Community
Violence, Social Support Networks, Ethnic Group Differences, and Male Perpetration of
Intimate Partner Violence. Article Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(10), 1615–1632.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260509331489
Raiford, J. L., … G. M. W.-J. of W., & 2007, undefined. (2007). Prevalence, Incidence, and
Predictors of Dating Violence: A Longitudinal Study of African American Female
Adolescents. Liebertpub.Com, 16(6), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2006.0002
99
Ramirez, J. R., Crano, W. D., Quist, R., Burgoon, M., Alvaro, E. M., & Grandpre, J. (2004).
Acculturation, Familism, Parental Monitoring, and Knowledge as Predictors of Marijuana
and Inhalant Use in Adolescents. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(1), 3–11.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.18.1.3
Reed, L. A., McCullough Cosgrove, J., Sharkey, J. D., & Felix, E. (2020). Exploring Latinx
Youth Experiences of Digital Dating Abuse. Social Work Research, 44(3), 157–168.
https://doi.org/10.1093/SWR/SVAA011
Reed, L. A., Tolman, R. M., Ward, L. M., & Safyer, P. (2016). Keeping tabs: Attachment
anxiety and electronic intrusion in high school dating relationships. Computers in Human
Behavior, 58, 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.019
Reingle, J. M., Jennings, W. G., Connell, N. M., Businelle, M. S., & Chartier, K. (2014). On
the Pervasiveness of Event-Specific Alcohol Use, General Substance Use, and Mental
Health Problems as Risk Factors for Intimate Partner Violence. Journal of Interpersonal
Violence, 29(16), 2951–2970. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260514527172
Rodriguez, N., Mira, C. B., Paez, N. D., of, H. F. M.-A. journal, & 2007, undefined. (n.d.).
Exploring the complexities of familism and acculturation: Central constructs for people
of Mexican origin. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10464-007-
9090-7.pdf
Romero, A. J., & Roberts, R. E. (2003). The Impact of Multiple Dimensions of Ethnic Identity
on Discrimination and Adolescents’ Self-Esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
33(11), 2288–2305. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01885.x
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Journal of Statistical Software lavaan: An R Package for Structural

Equation Modeling. http://www.jstatsoft.org/
Roth, K. B., Musci, R. J., & Eaton, W. W. (2020). Refining acculturation measures for health
research: Latina/o heterogeneity in the National Latino and Asian American Study.
International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 29(4), 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1844
100
Ruvalcaba, Y., & Eaton, A. A. (2019). Nonconsensual Pornography Among U.S. Adults: A
Sexual Scripts Framework on Victimization, Perpetration, and Health Correlates for
Women and Men. Psychology of Violence, 10(1), 68–78.
Ruvalcaba, Y., Stephens, D. P., & Eaton, A. A. (2020). Yale Post Doc Application. Culture,
Health and Sexuality. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1767805
Sabina, C., & Cuevas, C. (2013). THE EXPERIENCE OF DATING VIOLENCE AMONG
LATINO ADOLESCENTS. In preventconnect.org. http://www.preventconnect.org/wp-
content/uploads/2013/07/DAVILA-General-Population-Report.pdf
Sabina, C., & Straus, M. (2008). Polyvictimization by dating partners and mental health
among US college students. Connect.Springerpub.Com. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-
6708.23.6.667
Sabina, C., Cuevas, C. A., & Cotignola-Pickens, H. M. (2016). Longitudinal dating violence
victimization among Latino teens: Rates, risk factors, and cultural influences. Journal of
Adolescence, 47, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ADOLESCENCE.2015.11.003
Sabina, C., Cuevas, C. A., & Zadnik, E. (2015). Intimate Partner Violence among Latino
Women: Rates and Cultural Correlates. Journal of Family Violence, 30(1), 35–47.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9652-z
Saewyc, E. M., Brown, D., Plane, M. B., … M. P. M.-J. of A., & 2009, undefined. (n.d.).
Gender differences in violence exposure among university students attending campus
health clinics in the United States and Canada. Elsevier.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1054139X09001414
Salomon, A., Bassuk, S. S., & Huntington, N. (2002). The relationship between intimate
partner violence and the use of addictive substances in poor and homeless single mothers.
Violence Against Women, 8(7), 785–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780102400388489
Sanderson, M., Coker, A. L., Roberts, R. E., … S. R. T.-P., & 2004, undefined. (n.d.).
Acculturation, ethnic identity, and dating violence among Latino ninth-grade students.
Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743504000672
101
Schwartz, S. J., Côté, J. E., & Arnett, J. J. (2005). Identity and agency in emerging adulthood:
Two developmental routes in the individualisation process. Youth and Society, 37(2),
201–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X05275965
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010). Rethinking the
concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist,
65(4), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0019330
Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., Rodriguez, L., & Wang, S. C. (2007). The Structure of
Cultural Identity in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Emerging Adults. Basic and Applied
Social Psychology, 29(2), 159–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701332229
Scott, D. I. (2017). Latina Fortitude in the Face of Disadvantage: Exploring the Conditioning
Effects of Ethnic Identity and Gendered Ethnic Identity on Latina Offending.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9380-9
Semega, J., Kollar, M., Creamer, J., & Mohanty, A. (n.d.). Income and Poverty in the United
States: 2018 Current Population Reports. In census.gov.
https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2019/demo/p60-
266.pdf
Serrano-Villar, M., & Calzada, E. J. (2016). Ethnic identity: Evidence of protective effects for
young, Latino children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 42, 21–30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2015.11.002
Shorey, R. C., Mcnulty, J. K., Moore, T. M., & Stuart, G. L. (2016). Being the victim of
violence during a date predicts next-day cannabis use among female college students.
Addiction, 111(3), 492–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13196
Shulman, S., & Connolly, J. (2013). The challenge of romantic relationships in emerging
adulthood: Reconceptualization of the field. Emerging Adulthood, 1(1), 27-39.
Slakoff, D. C., Aujla, W., & Penzeymoog, · Eva. (2020). The Role of Service Providers,
Technology, and Mass Media When Home Isn’t Safe for Intimate Partner Violence
Victims: Best Practices and Recommendations in the Era of COVID-19 and Beyond.
Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49, 2779–2788. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01820-
w
102
Smith, K., Cénat, J. M., Lapierre, A., Dion, J., … M. H.-J. of affective, & 2018, undefined.
(n.d.). Cyber dating violence: Prevalence and correlates among high school students from
small urban areas in Quebec. Elsevier.
Smokowski, P. R., David-Ferdon, C., & Stroupe, N. (2009). Acculturation and violence in
minority adolescents: A review of the empirical literature. The Journal of Primary
Prevention, 30(3), 215-263.
Smokowski, P. R., Rose, R., & Bacallao, M. L. (2008). Acculturation and latino family
processes: How cultural involvement, biculturalism, and acculturation gaps influence
family dynamics. Family Relations, 57(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-
3729.2008.00501.x
Stappenbeck, C. A., behaviors, K. F.-A., & 2010, undefined. (n.d.). A longitudinal

investigation of heavy drinking and physical dating violence in men and women.
Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306460309003542
Steidel, L., Scale, F., & Lugo Steidel Josefina M Contreras, A. G. (2003). A New Familism
Scale for Use With Latino Populations. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 25(3), 312–330.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303256912
Steiner, P. M., Wroblewski, A., & Cook, T. D. (2009). Randomized Experiments and Quasi-
Experimental Designs in Educational Research. In The SAGE International Handbook of
Educational Evaluation. SAGE Publications, Inc.
https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226606.n5
Stephens, D. P., Fernandez, P. B., & Richman, E. L. (2012). Ni pardo, ni prieto: The influence
of parental skin color messaging on heterosexual emerging adult White-Hispanic
women's dating beliefs. Women & Therapy, 35(1-2), 4-18.
Stonard, K. E., Bowen, E., … T. R. L.-A. and V., & 2014, undefined. (n.d.). The relevance of
technology to the nature, prevalence and impact of adolescent dating violence and abuse:
A research synthesis. Elsevier.
103
Straus, M. A., Gelles, R. J., & Stienmetz, S. K. (2017). Behind closed doors: Violence in the
American family. Routledge.
Stueve, A., & O’Donnell, L. (2008). Urban young women’s experiences of discrimination and
community violence and intimate partner violence. Journal of Urban Health, 85(3), 386–
401. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-008-9265-z
Sullivan, T. P., McPartland, T. S., … S. A.-P. of, & 2012, undefined. (n.d.). Is it the exception
or the rule? Daily co-occurrence of physical, sexual, and psychological partner violence
in a 90-day study of substance-using, community women. Psycnet.Apa.Org.
https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-03613-001
Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of Intimate Partner Violence to Informal
Social Support Network Members: A Review of the Literature. Trauma, Violence, and
Abuse, 15(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838013496335
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cup
Archive.
Temple, J. R., Choi, H. J., … M. B.-J. of Y. and, & 2016, undefined. (n.d.). The temporal
association between traditional and cyber dating abuse among adolescents. Springer.
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10964-015-0380-3.pdf
Temple, J. R., Weston, R., Stuart, G. L., Behaviors, L. L. M.-A., & 2008, undefined. (n.d.).
The longitudinal association between alcohol use and intimate partner violence among
ethnically diverse community women. Elsevier.
Testa, M., & Leonard, K. E. (2001). The impact of marital aggression on women’s
psychological and marital functioning in a newlywed sample. Journal of Family
Violence, 16(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011154818394
Testa, M., Livingston, J. A., behaviors, K. E. L.-A., & 2003, undefined. (n.d.). Women’s
substance use and experiences of intimate partner violence: A longitudinal investigation
among a community sample. Elsevier.
104
Trafimow, D. (2014). Qualitative Research in Psychology Considering Quantitative and
Qualitative Issues Together. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 15–24.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2012.743202
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., & Fine, M. A. (2004). Examining Ethnic Identity among Mexican-
Origin Adolescents Living in the United States. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,
26(1), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986303262143
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., & Updegraff, K. A. (2007). Latino adolescents’ mental health: Exploring
the interrelations among discrimination, ethnic identity, cultural orientation, self-esteem,
and depressive symptoms. Journal of Adolescence, 30(4), 549–567.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.08.002
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Gonzales-Backen, M. A., & Guimond, A. B. (2009). Latino adolescents’

ethnic identity: Is there a developmental progression and does growth in ethnic identity
predict growth in self-esteem? Child Development, 80(2), 391–405.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01267.x
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Vargas-Chanes, D., Garcia, C. D., & Gonzales-Backen, M. (2008). A

longitudinal examination of latino adolescents’ ethnic identity, coping with
discrimination, and self-esteem. Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(1), 16–50.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431607308666
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Zeiders, K. H., & Updegraff, K. A. (2013). Family ethnic socialization
and ethnic identity: A family-driven, youth-driven, or reciprocal process? Journal of
Family Psychology, 27(1), 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031105
Valentine, S. E., Peitzmeier, S. M., King, D. S., O’cleirigh, C., Marquez, S. M., Presley, C., &
Potter, J. (n.d.). Disparities in Exposure to Intimate Partner Violence Among
Transgender/Gender Nonconforming and Sexual Minority Primary Care Patients.
https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2016.0113
van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M., & D’Haenens, L. (2017). Adolescent sexting from a
social learning perspective. Telematics and Informatics, 34(1), 287–298.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2016.05.009
105
Vidales, G. T. (2010). Arrested Justice: The Multifaceted Plight of Immigrant Latinas who
Faced Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence, 25(6), 533–544.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-010-9309-5
Villarreal, M. (2020). Latinas’ Reasons for and Patterns of Sexual Assault Disclosure.
Psychology, 11(10), 1519–1546. https://doi.org/10.4236/PSYCH.2020.1110097
Violence, I. L. R.-J. of F., & 2007, undefined. (n.d.). The relationship of acculturation and
social integration to assaults on intimate partners among Mexican American and non-
Mexican white students. Springer. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10896-
007-9102-2.pdf
Wallace, R. (2015). Domestic Violence and Intimate Partner Violence: What’s The
Difference? https://amuedge.com/domestic-violence-and-intimate-partner-violence-
whats-the-difference/
Wang, S. C., Schwartz, S. J., & Zamboanga, B. L. (2010). Acculturative Stress Among Cuban
American College Students: Exploring the Mediating Pathways Between Acculturation
and Psychosocial Functioning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(11), 2862–
2887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00684.x
Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-Sectional Studies: Strengths, Weaknesses, and
Recommendations. In Chest (Vol. 158, Issue 1, pp. S65–S71). Elsevier Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
Waterman, E. A., Edwards, K. M., Dardis, C. M., Kelley, E. L., Sessarego, S., & Paul, S.
(2021). Assessing Intimate Partner Violence Via Daily Diary Surveys: Feasibility,
Reporting, and Acceptability. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36, 9121–9142.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519865964
Watkins, L. E., Maldonado, R. C., & DiLillo, D. (2018). The Cyber Aggression in
Relationships Scale: A New Multidimensional Measure of Technology-Based Intimate
Partner Aggression. Assessment, 25(5), 608–626.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191116665696
Weiss, N. H., Duke, A. A., & Sullivan, T. P. (2014). Evidence for a curvilinear dose-response
relationship between avoidance coping and drug use problems among women who
106
experience intimate partner violence. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 27(6), 722–732.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2014.899586
Whitfield, D. L., Coulter, R. W. S., Langenderfer-Magruder, L., & Jacobson, D. (2021).

Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence Among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and
Transgender College Students: The Intersection of Gender, Race, and Sexual Orientation.
Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(12), 6040–6064.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518812071
Whitton, S. W., Dyar, C., Mustanski, B., & Newcomb, M. E. (2019). Intimate Partner
Violence Experiences of Sexual and Gender Minority Adolescents and Young Adults
Assigned Female at Birth. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(2), 232–249.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684319838972
Whitton, S., … M. N.-J. of, & 2019, undefined. (2019). A longitudinal study of IPV
victimization among sexual minority youth. Journals.Sagepub.Com, 34(5), 912–945.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260516646093
Williams, J. L., Aiyer, S. M., Durkee, M. I., & Tolan, P. H. (2014). The Protective Role of
Ethnic Identity for Urban Adolescent Males Facing Multiple Stressors. Journal of Youth
and Adolescence, 43(10), 1728–1741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0071-x
Wolford-Clevenger, C., Zapor, H., … H. B.-P. of, & 2016, undefined. (n.d.). An examination
of the Partner Cyber Abuse Questionnaire in a college student sample. Psycnet.Apa.Org.
https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/vio/6/1/156/
World Health Organization. (2021). Violence Against Women [Key Facts].

https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/violence-against-women
Wright, E. N., Anderson, J., Phillips, K., & Miyamoto, S. (2021). Help-Seeking and Barriers
to Care in Intimate Partner Sexual Violence: A Systematic Review. Trauma, Violence, &
Abuse, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838021998305
Yoshioka, M. R., Gilbert, L., El-Bassel, N., & Baig-Amin, M. (2003). Social Support and
Disclosure of Abuse: Comparing South Asian, African American, and Hispanic Battered
Women 1. Journal of Family Violence, 18(3).
107
Yuan, K. H., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). 5. Three likelihood-based methods for mean and
covariance structure analysis with nonnormal missing data. Sociological
methodology, 30(1), 165-200.
Zavala, E. (2020). Explaining Victimization Experienced by Latinas: A Test of Target

Congruence Theory. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 42(3), 381–400.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986320928189
Zimet, G. D., Dahlem, N. W., Zimet, S. G., & Farley, G. K. (1988). The Multidimensional
Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment, 52(1), 30–41.
https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hughes, N., Kelly, M., & Connolly, J. (2012). Intimacy, identity and
status: Measuring dating goals in late adolescence and emerging adulthood. Motivation
and Emotion, 36(3), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9253-6
Zweig, J. M., Dank, M., Yahner, J., & Lachman, P. (2013). The Rate of Cyber Dating Abuse
Among Teens and How It Relates to Other Forms of Teen Dating Violence. Journal of
Youth and Adolescence, 42(7), 1063–1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-9922-8
Zweig, J. M., Lachman, P., Yahner, J., & Dank, M. (2014). Correlates of cyber dating abuse
among teens. Journal of youth and adolescence, 43(8), 1306-1321.
108
VITA
YANET RUVALCABA
2012 - 2016 B.A., Psychology

Miami, FL
2016 - 2018 M.S., Psychology

Miami, FL
2018 - 2021 Doctoral Candidate

Psychology
Miami, FL
SELECT PUBLICATIONS & PRESENTATIONS
1. Ruvalcaba, Y., Rodriguez, A. Eaton, A.A., Stephens, D., Madhivanan, P. [under

review] The effectiveness of American college sexual assault interventions in
high-risk settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Submitted to
Aggression and Violent Behavior.
2. Ruvalcaba, Y., Stephens, D., Eaton, A.A., Boyd, B. (2020). Hispanic women’s
perceptions of teen sexting: Qualitative analyses using a sexual scripting
framework. Culture Health and Sexuality Journal, 1-16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1767805
3. Ruvalcaba, Y., Eaton, A. A. (2020). Nonconsensual porn among U.S. adults: A sexual
scripts framework on victimization, perpetration, and health correlates.
Psychology of Violence Journal. 10(1), 68-78.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/vio0000233
4. Ruiz, E., Ruvalcaba, Y., Berenstain, N., Fluegeman, S. (2020). Identifying the
economic impact of COVID-19 on survivors of color. https://metoomvmt.org/the-
work/research-the-economic-impact-of-covid-19-on-survivors-of-color/
5. Ruvalcaba, Y. (2017) Effectiveness of bilateral deep brain stimulation to dystonia:

Response to the latest meta-analysis. European Journal of Neurology, 24(6), e35-
e35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.13316.
109

Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Florida International University

FIU Digital Commons

FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations University Graduate School

Cyber Dating Abuse Among Emerging Adult Latina Women

Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd

Part of the Developmental Psychology Commons

CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT LATINA WOMEN

A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of

the requirements for the degree of

We have read this dissertation and recommend that it be approved.

Date of Defense: November 5, 2021

The dissertation of Yanet Ruvalcaba is approved.

Florida International University, 2021

All rights reserved.

this incredible life.

pudiera tener esta vida increíble.

supported me in this academic journey culminating in the successful completion of this

assistant to when I became a doctoral candidate, you inspired me and scaffolded my

deepened my understanding of scholarship as advocacy for marginalized populations.

into the scholar that I am.

feedback. Your gracious commitment to refining my scholarship and expertise enriched

my dissertation and professional growth immeasurably.

scientist, and scholar.

I also want to thank my lovely husband, my precious friends, and my beloved

CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT LATINA WOMEN

Florida International University, 2021

Professor Asia A. Eaton, Major Professor

This dissertation examines the experience of cyber dating abuse victimization

among Latina women in emerging adulthood. There is particular emphasis on

protective factors. Study one implemented a strength-based approach to investigating

and this relationship was mediated by family support.

well as polyvictimization. A longitudinal design was implemented with a three-month lag

no relationship with these health outcomes. The existence of polyvictimization was

II.STUDY ONE: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT

III. STUDY TWO: CYBER DATING ABUSE AMONG EMERGING ADULT

Study 1 First Familial Nation of Origin .............................................................................24

Study 1 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations .................................................................26

Study 1 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation

Study 1 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation

Study 2 First Familial Nation of Origin .............................................................................62

Study 2 Descriptive Statistics and Correlations .................................................................63

Study 2 Unstandardized Parameter Estimates of Hypothesized Structural Equation

1 Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 1..............................................22

2 Conceptual Diagram of Hypothesized Model for Study 2..............................................60

intimate relationships (Wallace, 2015), is globally and nationally recognized as a major

four categories of “traditional” or in-person IPV: physical violence, sexual violence,

social media, to inflict harm on a romantic partner (Watkins et al., 2018).

This emergent form of partner violence is unique in that the technological

psychological aggression), there is evidence that cyber dating abuse precedes

psychological violence that escalates to physical violence (Madlock & Westerman,

traditional forms of IPV and their associated harms.

Prevalence rates of cyber dating abuse victimization among individuals in the

2018). Another important consideration is gender; more specifically, the differential

abuse (Smith et al., 2018; Marganski & Fauth, 2013).

polyvictimization. In conjunction, these studies will contribute to our understanding of

THE ROLES OF ETHNIC IDENTITY, ACCULTURATION, AND FAMILIAL SOCIAL

lacking. The purpose of this strengths-based study was to examine culturally-specific

2009; Umana-Taylor, 2004), we examined the protective potential of ethnic identity,

undergraduate students attending a large Hispanic-serving university. The best fitting

abuse. Surprisingly, ethnic identity commitment had an inverse relationship with