Cho 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 806 012013

Journal of Physics: Conference Series
PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like

- Electron–positron pair creation from the
Pressure Characteristic Analysis of a Hydraulic vacuum by the Feshbach resonance
X X Zhou, C K Li, X N Cao et al.
System - Void-Free Copper Filling of Through
Silicon Via by Periodic Pulse Reverse
Electrodeposition
To cite this article: H. Y. Cho and H. J. Yang 2017 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 806 012013 Q. S. Zhu, A. Toda, Y. Zhang et al.
- Regimes of bandwidth enhancement in

coupled-cavity semiconductor laser using
photon–photon resonance
Mohammed S. Al-Ghamdi, Hamed Dalir,
View the article online for updates and enhancements. Ahmed Bakry et al.
This content was downloaded from IP address 105.119.3.162 on 09/01/2024 at 07:20

CCEAI IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 806 (2017) 012013 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/806/1/012013
International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics 2016 (ICRTP2016) IOP Publishing

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 755 (2016) 011001 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001
Pressure Characteristic Analysis of a Hydraulic System
H. Y. Choa and H. J. Yangb

a
Hydraulic Friends Co., Ltd. 1MA-708, Sihwa Industrial Complex Jongwang-Dong,
Siheung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, South Korea
b
Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Korea Polytechnic University,
Siheung-city, Gyeonggi-Do, 15073, South Korea
Abstract. EPPR(ElectroProportional Pressure Reducing) valve control the MCV(Main

Control Valve) built on the mobile heavy machine. The EPPR valve was tested in the
experimental setup and the performance of the valve was compared with that of the existing
EPPR valve. On thisstudy, electromagnetic properties analysis using AMESim program was
performed to optimize the designing of EPPR Valve (Electric Proportional Pressure Reducing
Valve) and by applying its results to the hydraulic system analytical model, performance of the
valve could be predicted. Also by comparing the results of the actual experiment and the
simulation, The results of thisstudy is that the 3 factor(cone angle, tip width, clearance between
sleeve and plunger) have much effectiveness than other components in the EPPR valve.
1. Introduction
EPPR valve (Electric Proportional Pressure Reducing Valve) has been used in controlling hydraulic
system electrically. It is the valve controlling pressure proportional input-current and is using
industrial department (fork lift, excavator, special motorcar, heavy machine) variously [1,2].
As shown in figure 1, the study of EPPR Valve has been very important because it must satisfied fl
ow force, hysteresis, linear form, repeating precision. So, it was performed hydraulic characteristic of
newdesigned model EPPR valve using of AMESim and compared with experimental method.
2. Modeling for AMESim analysis.

Modeling of EPPR valve was completed with assemble HCD component and library in AMESim
program. The viscous friction value of spool was determined two kinds method [3,4].
First, the case of non- spring model, it was used viscous friction coefficient of the meaning of
physical.
 D L  
Cv 
clearance
 N


m
s
  


  
D : diameter of mass
L : contact length of mass and chamber
clearance : distance within of mass and chamber
Second, the case of spring existing model, it was used viscous friction coefficient of the meaning of math
ematical.
 
Cv  2  N


km
m
s
 


  damping ratio 0.4 
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
On the above expression, the system was damped over and oscillation was not created if damping
ratio was too big, the system was damped under and oscillation was created if damping ratio was too
small. But the parameter value showing above expression was not just exacted and the various
parameter operated to determine viscous friction coefficient. The exact value of viscous friction
coefficient was determined only by experiment. But, on this paper, additional experiment was omitted
and added next assumption.
∙ The temperature variation of system was assumed normal condition maintaining initial condition.
∙ The volume of load side was constant.
Figure 1. structure of EPPR valve
3. Results of AMESim analysis

The valve of supply pressure Ps was 25bar and viscosity damping coefficient B was 8000 [N/(m/sec)]
and another parameter was displayed in table 1. The parameter of solenoid was shown in figure 2 [5], [
6]. The parameter value of solenoid valve was displayed in table 2. AMESim model of EPPR Valve was s
hown in figure 3. Using of 3D table editor, as shown in figure 4, the magnetic analysis values of Max
well program was inputted in AMESim program parameter and the output values of P-
I diagram was generated according to spool stroke.
Table 1. parameter value of EPPR Valve
parameter name parameter value unit
M
spool mass 0.97 g
s
M
amateur mass 27.75 g
s
viscosity damping N/(m/se

B 8000
coefficient c)
Ks spool spring coefficient 0.2353 N/mm
ds spool diameter 3.5 mm
β volume elastic coefficient 8000 bar
Ps supply pressure 25 bar
Pt tank pressure 0 bar
Cd orifice coefficient 0.61 -
2
ρ oil density 880 kg/m3
Figure 2. paratemeter of solenoid valve
Table 2. Changing value of solenoid valve shape

rear front
cone angle tip width clearance
groove groove
existent
270 0.3mm 0.2mm 13.8mm 3.6mm
value
new value 260 0.2mm 0.1mm 9.5mm 2.0mm
Figure 3. AMESim model of EPPR Valve
3
Figure 4. 3D table of current-stroke force
Figure 5. P-I diagram of AMESim analysis result adapting new value

Resulting of AMESim program analysis, the pressure linear form of EPPR valve was in proportion
from 100 mA to 700 mA and the range of pressure was controlled from 0 bar to 25 bar as shown in fig
ure 5 [7].
4. Hydraulic characteristic experiment of EPPR valve

It was obtained the P-I diagram according to current value of EPPR valve by experiment connecting
with PC type data acquisition system and then the supply pressure Ps was 50 bar. The experimental
system of EPPR valve was shown in figure 6.
[hydraulic power unit & test stand]
- Regular pressure : 210 bar
- Regular flow : 70 lpm
- 16 channel strain amplifier
4
Figure 6. experimental system of EPPR valve
Figure 7. experimental P-I diagram of existent value
Figure 8. experimental P-I diagram of new value
5. Forklift application experiment of improved EPPR valve
Figure 9. Forlift equipped improved EPPR valve
5
Figure 10. pressure control diagram of improved EPPR valve
6. Results of experimental analysis

The linear pressure range was started from 300mA in existent model as shown in figure 7, but it was
started from 100mA in new manufactured model as shown in figure 8. So, The non-linear pressure
range of new manufactured model was improved about 30%. The improved linear pressure range is
meant that it is able to descend the useful pressure of EPPR valve and the controllable pressure range
is extended widely contrast to existent model. Also, the hysteresis was improved properly about the
first stage of EPPR operating system. It was shown Forlift equipped improved EPPR valve in figure 9.
Though Lift-up valve was operated at 4.3 sec and Lift-down valve was operated from 9 sec to 13.7 sec
in figure 10, it was able to know the system was operating very stable.
7. Conclusions
It was proved that the result of simulation using AMESim coincided with result of experiment nearly.
And then it was able to suggest the optimum model condition of AMESim program.
It was changed the dimension of EPPR valve parts by the results AMESim simulation and was proved
that the sleeve of cone angle, tip width, clearance of plunger and sleeve was very important parameter.
The performance of new manufactured model was improved about 30% and the controllable pressure
range is extended widely contrast to existent model.
We were able to know that the Forklift operating pressure and velocity was followed suitable and the
system was operated very stable in field experiment adapting improved EPPR valve.
Acknowledgments
This paper was supported by Gyeonggi-do and Siheung-city under Industry-University Convergence
Campus Outcome Utilization Project, a provincial government financial support program, Korea.
References
[1] Kim B L and Oh, I. K, 2013 Fall Conference Proceedings KSME pp 4-5
[2] Kim H M, Tae H J, Lee H W and Lee C H 2003 Transactions of KSAE Vol 11 No 6 pp 80-85
[3] Yun S N, Ham Y B and Park P W 2006 Journal of the KSME (A) Vol 30 No 10 pp 1202-1208
[4] Tae H J, Jung H I, Kim H M and Lee H W 2003 Transactions of KSAE Fall Conference pp 70-76
[5] S N Yun and D Y Yun 2009 Journal of the KFPS Vol 6 No 3 pp 28-34
[6] B J Lim and C D Park 2014 Journal of the KSFC Vol 11 No 1 pp 26-34
[7] M G Cho and D Y Shin 2010 Spring Conference Proceedings KSME pp 1109-1110

Cho 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 806 012013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cho 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 806 012013

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cho 2017 J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 806 012013

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal of Physics: Conference Series

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like

- Regimes of bandwidth enhancement in

This content was downloaded from IP address 105.119.3.162 on 09/01/2024 at 07:20

International Conference on Recent Trends in Physics 2016 (ICRTP2016) IOP Publishing

Pressure Characteristic Analysis of a Hydraulic System

H. Y. Choa and H. J. Yangb

Abstract. EPPR(ElectroProportional Pressure Reducing) valve control the MCV(Main

2. Modeling for AMESim analysis.

Figure 1. structure of EPPR valve

3. Results of AMESim analysis

viscosity damping N/(m/se

ρ oil density 880 kg/m3

Figure 2. paratemeter of solenoid valve

Table 2. Changing value of solenoid valve shape

Figure 3. AMESim model of EPPR Valve

Figure 4. 3D table of current-stroke force

Figure 5. P-I diagram of AMESim analysis result adapting new value

4. Hydraulic characteristic experiment of EPPR valve

Figure 6. experimental system of EPPR valve

Figure 7. experimental P-I diagram of existent value

Figure 8. experimental P-I diagram of new value

5. Forklift application experiment of improved EPPR valve

Figure 9. Forlift equipped improved EPPR valve

Figure 10. pressure control diagram of improved EPPR valve

6. Results of experimental analysis

You might also like