Are you struggling with writing a literature review for your computer science research paper?

You're
not alone. Crafting a comprehensive and insightful literature review can be an arduous task,
requiring extensive research, critical analysis, and proficient writing skills. It's a crucial component of
any academic paper, providing a synthesis of existing knowledge and setting the stage for your own
research contributions.

The process of writing a literature review involves:

1. Research: Thoroughly scouring academic databases, journals, books, and other credible
sources to gather relevant literature related to your research topic.
2. Analysis: Carefully evaluating and synthesizing the gathered information to identify key
themes, trends, and gaps in the existing literature.
3. Organization: Structuring your literature review in a coherent and logical manner, often
following a thematic or chronological approach to present your findings effectively.
4. Writing: Articulating your thoughts clearly and concisely, while also integrating the findings
of other researchers to support your arguments and conclusions.
5. Citation: Properly attributing sources using appropriate citation styles such as APA, MLA, or
Chicago.

Given the complexity and time-consuming nature of writing a literature review, many students and
researchers find themselves overwhelmed by the task. However, there's no need to fret. Help is
readily available.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges you face when tackling a literature review.
That's why we offer expert assistance tailored to your specific needs. Our team of experienced
writers specializes in various fields, including computer science, and can provide you with a high-
quality literature review that meets the highest academic standards.

By ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can:

Save time and effort: Focus on other aspects of your research while our experts handle the
literature review for you.
Ensure quality and accuracy: Rely on the expertise of our writers to deliver a well-researched
and meticulously written literature review.
Meet deadlines: We understand the importance of timely submissions and strive to deliver
your work promptly.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the assistance you need to excel in your studies. Contact us
today to get started!
The literature search was repeated in February 2020 using the extended search phrase in the second
phase, resulting in 681 papers and 551 papers after removing the duplicated entries. For example,
linkages to or disagreements with other theories, questions raised but unanswered, shortcomings or
limitations, and so forth. If you want to format your paper in APA style, then follow these rules: Use
1-inch page margins. Nonetheless, the experiment yielded promising results on HKR dataset, with a
WAR increase up to 24.1% when combining different types of synthetic data. Systematic Approaches
to a Successful Literature Review. To illustrate the classification, consider this example: a book can
be described using 3 different types of metadata. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998;
Jesson, Jill. One of the main issues is that it assumes all characters have the same width, limiting the
diversity and realism of the generated images. On the other hand, works based on deep learning
involve synthesizing images of handwritten text from scratch using the cursive style learned from the
dataset. Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. An effect is simply
an observed relationship between variables in a sample of subjects. Instead, it focuses on existing
studies relevant to the main topic. ? Here is a literature review outline example on the subject of the
Ebola virus to help you get it right: Introduce the general topic. Consider using an article summary,
or study summary to help you organize and summarize your sources. Once you have found some
sources, be sure to define whether or not they are actually relevant to your topic and research
question. Figure 7 shows the distribution of dataset usage among the reviewed studies. In the
preceding example, Falk and Mills either directly refer in the text to the author of their source, such
as Hamilton, or they provide ample notation in the text when the ideas they are mentioning are not
their own, for example, Gastil’s. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-
reviewed articles and journals. A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly
article, usually falling after the introduction and before the research methods sections. It is worth
noting that while these methods showed promising results with a CAR of 97.4%, they were
specifically tailored to the ancient Sundanese characters of this dataset. This will give you a chance
to take your mind off it and then get back to proofreading with a fresh perspective. Find places to
write where you can concentrate, and take breaks often to stretch, get a snack or even step outside
for a few minutes. This is to make sure that there are no spelling or grammar errors done. It will then
be considered as a supporting document or a subsection of that study. A summary is always much
shorter than the original text. Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus
of theory that has accumulated in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. This will also
guarantee that the flow of sentences is organized and clear. Create an organizational method to focus
this section even further. This indicates that these two levels share similar challenges, where data
augmentation applied to words can expand to text lines, and data augmentation applied to text lines
can contract to words. Yes, they are difficult and require a strong degree of comprehension of
academic studies. This paper is the report of an ITiCSE working group that conducted a systematic
review in order to gain an overview of the introductory programming literature.
Subsequently, an optical model was trained using a balanced combination of synthetic and real
images, which contributed to a relative improvement of 10.4% on CASIA dataset. This underscores
the potential of augmenting the training data with synthetic images. If no standards were suitable or
the current method for defining standards was no longer appropriate, a new conceptual approach
may help. Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your
assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification
from your professor by asking these questions: 1. Remarkably, they achieved Character Error Rates
(CER—the lower, the better) of 3.0%, 1.4%, and 5.0% on the IAM, RIMES, and READ datasets.
Pattern Recognit. 2022;129: 108766.. Scheidl H, Fiel S, Sablatnig R. This makes it possible to handle
languages with a large number of characters, such as Japanese and Latin, simultaneously.
Nonetheless, the study might benefit from a more extensive evaluation across languages and a
comparison with other existing approaches. Consider organization You’ve got a focus, and you’ve
stated it clearly and directly. All you have to do is skim through literature review chapters of existing
dissertations related to your topic and you’ll find a gold mine of potential literature. Reviewers'
categorization of the tasks of a metadata-driven data integration process. Existing literature on
quality of service for web services gave rise to the four. Thus, the focus questions were as follows:
Q1: How is the term “metadata” defined in different research fields. Excellence is the thing we never
sacrifice for anything. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the
writing process. Arithmetic problem solving examplesArithmetic problem solving examples what is
financial planning for a business school what is the value of a college education essay examples
verizon wireless business plan pricing killer business plan write a business plan online free printable
sample business plan for a shopping center pdf software to solve statistics problems definition
business plan lit review for dissertation can you use you in a research paper examples. Thank you so
much for your guide of video and other instructions for the dissertation writing. Now what is the
most effective way of presenting the information. Once you’ve got a full first draft (however rough
it may be), step away from it for a day or two (longer if you can) and then come back at it with fresh
eyes. Additionally, it is noteworthy that some studies have used an end-to-end solution, creating
their own data augmentation methods and testing them with standard handwriting recognition
metrics. If you do a thorough review of the relevant literature (as you must!), you’re going to read
many, many articles, and it’s simply impossible to remember who said what, when, and in what
context. It is not enough that you will only cite the research you gathered. It is worth noting that
while these methods showed promising results with a CAR of 97.4%, they were specifically tailored
to the ancient Sundanese characters of this dataset. Nevertheless, reviews on metadata have been
carried out. Something to be conducted at the end of your research. A literature review is a
document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources
in conversation with each other (also called synthesis ). The dissertation will not be accepted without
this. These steps will help you create a top-notch literature review with ease. The adage, “measure
twice, cut once” is very suitable here. The papers identified in this systematic review satisfied our
search criteria, showcasing a range of approaches, methods, and applications in the field of offline
handwritten text recognition. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to
look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art
work.
Feel free to ask questions or share additional instructions. In this paper, we present a guide designed
for researchers and in particular early-stage researchers in the computer-science field. Here are some
examples: Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time,
which helps familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something
that is not commonly known in your field). The conceptual contribution of this research article could
be that experiential learning is one way to teach compassion to nursing students, as supported by case
studies and reflective logs. This is very good video which is well explained with detailed explanation
Thank you excellent piece of work and great mentoring Thanks, it was useful Thank you very much.
It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism. I am doing two
papers on my final year thesis, and I must stay I feel very confident to face both headlong after
reading this article. Consequently, awareness of a limited number of supported standards that are
improved and therefore followed by the community will be an important goal. This versatility makes
its application more comprehensive (Fig. 10 ). Examples of synthetic handwritten text images created
by the reviewed works. In the mapping process, a domain expert uses the proposals of the matching
process to define functions or uses external rule sets (eg, Unified Code for Units of Measure) to
transform the source data structure into a target data structure. Although recognition for scientists
mainly comes from primary research, timely literature reviews can lead to new synthetic insights and
are often widely read. A study of data augmentation for handwritten character recognition using
deep learning. Moreover, we analyzed different terms and variations to ensure that the search string is
precise and not generic, with the specific focus on the research objective. It is important to keep track
of your resources and to reference them consistently in the format required by the publication in
which your work will appear. Subject 3: A brief overview of the particular piece of literature in
general terms; an analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the research questions,
methods, procedures, and outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak points, gaps, and
contradictions. Structure of a Literature Review How to structure a literature review: Like many
other types of academic writing, a literature review follows a typical intro-body-conclusion style
with 5 paragraphs overall. Harmonized Definitions for Metadata Processing Ten reviewers
participated in the harmonization process. The matching process describes the alignment of given
data structures or metadata and creates an alignment proposal between the individual data elements.
In some cases, this is considered as a part of a thesis. The study did not compare their technique
directly with other advanced data augmentation methods, leaving a gap in understanding its relative
performance. Literature Review Example In the video below, we unpack an actual literature review
so that you can see how all the core components come together in reality. The format and structure
might differ depending on factors like your institution’s requirements. Systematic literature reviews
in software engineering—a tertiary study. Download Word doc Download Google doc Before you
begin searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic. Pick one of these themes to focus the
organization of your review. In a research paper, you use the literature as a foundation and as support
for a new insight that you contribute. The assessments resulted in 37 relevant standards mentioned
and used in the selected publications. Furthermore, data augmentation techniques have the potential
to be applied in various related fields, such as handwriting recognition, writer identification,
keyword spotting, and more. Evaluate sources. Identify themes, debates and gaps. Summarize - The
final report provides a complete description of the methods and results in a clear, transparent fashion.
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present. The authors
redefined the structural relationship between characters in a sequence by breaking the bond between
style and content. Methodological If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that
use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results and conclusions that
emerge from different approaches. Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature
review and have permission from the student to post. Furthermore, the reviewers assessed to which
degree the metadata processing tasks can be automated. However, if you are writing a review in the
humanities, history, or social sciences, a survey of the history of the literature may be what is needed,
because what is important is how perspectives have changed through the years or within a certain
time period. To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to
understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. Based on these
results, the authors conclude that an apple a day does not keep the doctor away, but it may keep the
pharmacist away. It would have been desirable to extend the period to the previous 20 or even 30
years, but the amount of work would not be justifiable. Subject 3: A brief overview of the particular
piece of literature in general terms; an analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the
research questions, methods, procedures, and outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak
points, gaps, and contradictions. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the
field to get a sense of what your discipline expects. Notifications This repository hosts an Obsidian
vault tailored for conducting a Systematic Literature Review (SLR). In addition, domain-specific
search engines (such as PubMed) were not used; yet, the majority of papers were from the field of
medical informatics. Summarize - The final report provides a complete description of the methods
and results in a clear, transparent fashion. Begin composing Once you’ve settled on a general pattern
of organization, you’re ready to write each section. The only proofreading tool specialized in
correcting academic writing - try for free. Let's take a closer look at this with our custom essay
writer. Understand what exactly you would like to say, and structure the source comparison
accordingly. 3. Avoid Generalizations Remember that each piece of literature will approach the MOP
from a different angle. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. To evaluate the
differences in reviewers’ understandings of these definitions, the Fleiss kappa was calculated.
Information such as the time of processing and receipt of response together with other. Thus, two or
more sets of document images that have good similarity in writing pattern can benefit from training a
joint optical model. In addition, some platforms offer more filters than others, and hence, the same
filters are considered and manually applied in the next step. Instead, you need to read first and distil
the information, then plan and execute the writing. When materials are ready, we write the text from
scratch. Script-level word sample augmentation for few-shot handwritten text recognition. Below is a
five-step process for conducting a simple review of the literature for your project. The local logic
level refers to the logical prediction of the part of the database used by. For example, in a literature
review or meta analysis you may want to briefly summarize this study as part of a wider discussion
of various sources. Take notes and cite your sources As you read, you should also begin the writing
process.
This review was limited to bibliography standards but gives an impressive overview. Even when
paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes
to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature.
The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of conducting a literature
review follows the same steps. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further. As
a result, we believe that the convergence of two promising technologies (virtualization and mobile
agents) can create cost-effective, robust, reliable, and easy-to-manage frameworks. Ramakrishnan R.
(1998). Database Management Systems. New York: McGraw-Hill. Read the introduction and the
conclusion together and compare them: What did the author set out to do, and what was the
outcome. Therefore, our definition could be used as a delimitation to define the latter field precisely.
This is because of the direct nature of the benefits accruing to web service provider and the. As
shown in Figure 4, the new scheme is based on the identification and separation of the context in
terms of metadata creation. If you choose this strategy, be careful to avoid simply listing and
summarizing sources in order. Instead of using this theme as one of the review findings, the
reviewers should read and interpret beyond the given description in an article, compare and contrast
themes, findings from one article with findings and themes from another article to find similarities
and differences and to understand and explain bigger picture for their readers. This will give you a
chance to take your mind off it and then get back to proofreading with a fresh perspective.
Integrative Review: This review method is more inclusive than others, allowing for the simultaneous
inclusion of experimental and non-experimental research. Existing literature has extensively
discussed the different aspects of quality of. Literature reviews summarize existing research to
answer a review question, provide the context for new research, or identify important gaps in the
existing body of literature. The authors found that the literature lacks clarity about how naturalness is
defined and measured, but also found that food consumption is significantly influenced by perceived
naturalness of goods. We also provide practical tips on how to communicate the results of a review
of current literature on a topic in the format of a literature review. 7.1 What is a literature review.
Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT and AI in Testing - A Real-World Look, present. Read the details
as well in order to construct a detailed literature review. AB - As computing becomes a mainstream
discipline embedded in the school curriculum and acts as an enabler for an increasing range of
academic disciplines in higher education, the literature on introductory programming is growing. In
this way, sets of images that involve multiple writers tend to be more challenging than sets with only
one writer, due to the high variability in writing patterns. Consider organization You’ve got a focus,
and you’ve stated it clearly and directly. Qualitative versus quantitative research Empirical versus
theoretical scholarship Divide the research by sociological, historical, or cultural sources Theoretical:
In many humanities articles, the literature review is the foundation for the theoretical framework.
The suggested normalization method is adaptive, accommodating variations in handwriting scale,
which consequently improves the optical model’s tolerance to writing differences. In other words, a
complete understanding the research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge
and perspectives have changed over time. Doing Your Literature Review: Traditional and Systematic
Techniques. Also, it helps in tracking and figuring out the flaws associated or linked with the
previous research. Below are the general guidelines on which this part is usually based. However,
this approach became challenging to implement under restricted dataset, requiring a larger volume of
data to improve performance.