Ijeet 11 04 043
Ijeet 11 04 043
Ijeet 11 04 043
Volume 11, Issue 4, June 2020, pp. 384-391, Article ID: IJEET_11_04_043
Available online at https://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJEET?Volume=11&Issue=4
ISSN Print: 0976-6545 and ISSN Online: 0976-6553
DOI: https://doi.org/10.34218/IJEET.11.4.2020.043
M. Saravana Kumar
Assistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering,
Mailam Engineering College, Mailam, Tindivanam, TamilNadu, India.
ABSTRACT
This paper describes the Control method of calculating the reference currents for
shunt active power filters under different load conditions. In PHC method was applied
to a three-phase four wire system in order to reduce harmonics present in the source
current .When the non- linear load connected across the source, source current
getting harmonics, due to the harmonics load heated very short time so to avoid this
problem to reduce the harmonics present in the source current . This compensation
method will generate un- compensating current to compensate the source current.
These methods produce more optimal solution based on the MATLAB simulation.
Key words: Shunt Active Power Filter (SAPF), Perfect Harmonic Cancellation (PHC)
method, Point of common coupling (PCC).
Cite this Article: A. Muthuraman and M. Saravana Kumar, PHC Control Method for
Shunt Active Power Filters in Three-Phase Four-Wire Systems. International Journal
of Electrical Engineering and Technology, 11(4), 2020, pp. 384-391.
https://iaeme.com/Home/issue/IJEET?Volume=11&Issue=4
1. INTRODUCTION
Power electronic devices and inductive load are more widely used in industrial, commercial,
and domestic applications, due to more inductive load cause to drawing non- sinusoidal
current and reactive power from the source. This more reactive power consumption causes
voltage distortion that affects other loads connected at a point of common coupling (PCC).
The Active power filters (APFs) are being developed as a possible alternative to this problem.
The block diagram of control method for a shunt active power filter (Fig.1) generates the
reference current, that has got to be provided by the active filter to compensate reactive power
and harmonic currents required by the load. This method includes a group of currents within
the limit of phase domain, which can be traced the generating signals applied to the converter
by means of the closed-loop switching control technique like PWM control, hysteresis current
control or dead-beat control. This is used to calculate the compensating current in terms of the
reference source current.
𝑖𝐶𝑟𝑒𝑓 = 𝑖𝐿 − 𝑖𝑆𝑟𝑒𝑓
The proposed control is perfect harmonic cancellation (PHC) method, for the calculation
of the reference currents during a shunt active power filter connected to a three-phase four-
wire system, which supplies an un-compensating current to compensate requirement of reactive
current in nonlinear load (Fig. 1). The simulations under both ideal and distorted mains
voltage conditions are presented.[1]
The perfect harmonic cancellation (PHC) method is often considered a modification of
classical p-q compensation, UPF compensation technique and indirect p-q compensation
theories. Its objective is to compensate all the harmonic currents and the fundamental
component reactive of power demanded by the load. The source current is in phase
with the elemental positive-sequence component of the voltage at the PCC [8].
Figure 1 Three phase four wire sources with nonlinear load and shunt active power filter.
The load active power is calculated as follows
𝑃(𝑡) = 𝑖𝑟 𝑣𝑟 + 𝑖𝑦 𝑣𝑦 + 𝑖𝑏 𝑣𝑏 = 𝑃𝑑𝑐 + 𝑃𝑎𝑐
Then only fundamental component of load voltage are taken for calculating the desired
current.
𝑖𝑜𝑑 0
𝑃𝑑𝑐
𝑖
( 𝛼𝑑 ) = 𝑒
2 ( 𝛼)
𝑖𝛽𝑑 (𝑒𝛼 )2 + (𝑒𝛽 ) 𝑒𝛽
Where 𝑒𝛼 and 𝑒𝛽 are the fundamental components of load voltage and calculated from
original voltages by means of ordinary filter circuits like Low-pass filter and band-pass filters.
[8]
The reference source current is be given by
𝑖𝑆𝑟𝑒𝑓 = 𝐾. 𝑢1+
Where u1+ is the fundamental component positive-sequence voltage at PCC.
The power delivered by the source will then be
𝑃𝑠 = 𝑢. 𝑖𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑓 = 𝑢. 𝐾. 𝑢1+
The constant K will be determined with the condition that the above source power equals
the dc component of the instantaneous active power demanded by the load.
𝑝̅𝐿𝛼𝛽 + 𝑝̅𝐿0
𝑘=
(𝑢02 + 𝑢𝛼2 + 𝑢𝛽2 )
𝑑𝑐
Finally, the reference source current calculation will be given by 𝛼 − 𝛽 − 𝑜
transformation,
𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑢0 𝑢0
𝑝̅𝐿𝛼𝛽 + 𝑝̅𝐿0
[𝑖𝑠𝛼𝑟𝑒𝑓 ] = 𝐾 [𝑢𝛼 ] = 2 2 + 𝑢2 )
[𝑢𝛼 ]
𝑖𝑠𝛽𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝑢𝛽
(𝑢0 + 𝑢𝛼 𝛽 𝑢𝛽
𝑑𝑐
1
𝑈𝑒 = √𝑢𝑅 2 + 𝑢𝑌 2 + 𝑢𝐵 2
3
1
𝐼𝑒 = √𝐼𝑅 2 + 𝐼𝑌 2 + 𝐼𝐵 2
3
𝑆𝑒 = 3𝑈𝑒𝐼𝑒
The total active power is obtained by adding the active power in each phase
𝑃 = ∑ ∑ 𝑈𝐾ℎ 𝐼𝐾ℎ 𝐶𝑂𝑆𝜑𝐾ℎ
𝑘 ℎ
Where k means the phase (R, Y, B), this the order of the harmonic voltage and 𝜑𝐾ℎ is the
angle between the h th harmonic voltage and the h th harmonic current for phase k. the total
power factor of the system is given by
𝑃
𝑃𝐹 =
𝑆𝑒
The PHC method correctly compensates the fundamental reactive power with unity
displacement power factor.
active filter used to cut off the harmonics .The hysteresis current controller to inject reference
current through 𝛼 − 𝛽 − 𝑜 transformation.[5]
This method is unable to compensate the dc zero-sequence active power demanded by the
load, so that an external source would be needed in such situations. This problem could be
obviated if were replaced by
𝑖𝑠𝑜𝑟𝑒𝑓 0
𝑃𝐿𝛼𝛽 + 𝑝𝐿𝑜 1
[𝑖𝑠𝛼𝑟𝑒𝑓 ] = ( ) [𝑢𝛼 ]
√𝑢 2 + 𝑢2 √𝑢 2 + 𝑢2
𝑖𝑠𝛽𝑟𝑒𝑓 𝛼 𝛽 𝑑𝑐
𝛼 𝛽 𝑢𝛽
PHC: This method ensures the sinusoidal and balanced currents in phase with positive
fundamental harmonic voltages, although harmonics and/or imbalance appear in the PCC
voltage. However, the source delivers reactive power and ac components of active power so
that PF is less than unity.[1]
4. SIMULATION MODEL
Figure 3 Control stage scheme formed by the PHC control strategy block and the current controller.
Figure 7 Simulation results for PHC load current, source current after compensation.
5. CONCLUSION
This paper has provided control of shunt APFs in three-phase four-wire systems with
harmonic distortion or imbalance. These methods are the most sensitive to distortion and
imbalance in the voltages at the PCC. Although it is to attain unity PF and to minimize the
source current RMS values, three-phase four-wire systems with zero-sequence components in
the voltage. The simulations show that source voltage and source current before compensation
and after compensation also gate pulse provided to the control circuits with reactive power
compensation, this was confirmed by MATLAB simulink Simulation.
REFERENCES
[1] H. Akagi, Y. Kanazawa, and A. Nabae, (1984) “Instantaneous reactive power
compensators comprising switching devices without energy storage components,” IEEE
Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. IA-20, no. 3, pp. 625–630, May/Jun.
[2] F.-Z. Peng, G. W. Ott, and D. J. Adams, (1998) “Harmonic and reactive power
compensation based on the generalized instantaneous reactive power theory for three-
phase four-wire systems,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1174–1181.
[3] J. Afonso, C. Couto, and J. Martins, (2000) “Active filters with control based on the p–q
theory,” IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc. Newslett., pp. 5–11.
[4] M. Aredes and E. H.Watanabe, (1995) “New control algorithms for series and shunt three-
phase four-wire active power filters,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp.
1649–1656.
[5] A. Nabae and T. Tanaka, (1996) “A new definition of instantaneous active reactive current
and a power based on instantaneous space vectors on polar coordinates in three phase
circuits,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 1238–1243
[6] V. Soares, P. Verdelho, and G. D. Marques, (2000) “An instantaneous active and reactive
current component method for active filters,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 15, no. 4,
pp. 660–669.
[7] M.-R. Rafiei, H. A. Toliyat, R. Ghazi, and T. Gopalarathanam, (2001) “An optimal and
flexible control strategy for active filtering and power factor correction under
nonsinusoidal line voltages,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 297–305.
[8] A. Cavallani and G. C. Montarani, (1994) “Compensation strategies for shunt active-filter
control,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 587–593.
[9] Y. Xu, L. M. Tolbert, F. Z. Peng, J. N. Chiasson, and J. Chen, (2003) “Compensation-
based nonactive power definition,” IEEE Power Electron. Lett., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 455–450.
[10] M. Depenbrock, V. Staudt, and H. Wrede, (2003) “A theoretical investigation of original
and modified instantaneous power theory applied to four wire systems,” IEEE Trans. Ind.
Appl., vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1160–1168, Jul./Aug.
[11] IEEE (1996) Working Group on Nonsinusoidal Situations: Effects on Meter Performance
and Definitions of Power, “Practical definitions for powers in systems with nonsinusoidal
waveforms and unbalanced loads: a discussion,” IEEE Trans. Power Delivery, vol. 11, no.
1, pp. 79–101.
[12] A. E. Emanuel, (2004) “Summary of IEEE Standard 1459: definitions for the
measurement of electric power quantities under sinusoidal, nonsinusoidal, balanced, or
unbalanced conditions,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 869–876, May/Jun.
[13] R.J.Motiyani, Mr.A.P.Desai, (2013) Three Phase Shunt Active Filter with Constant
Instantaneous Power Control Strategy, International Journal of Electrical Engineering
and Technology, 4(4), pp. 245-254.
[14] Smita Singhai, Bharti Dewani, (2013) PLL Based Shunt Active Harmonic Filter to
Compensate Multiple Non-Linear Loads, International Journal of Electronics and
Communication Engineering & Technology, 4(4), pp. 198-205