Entirecauselist

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

BOMBAY HIGHCOURT

DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST


For Friday The 22nd December 2023
COURT NO. 53
DIVISION
AT 10:30 AM
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHYAM C. CHANDAK

HEADER NOTE :
NOTE :
1)Website- https://zoom.us
Link- https://zoom.us/my/dbcourt7
Meeting Number- 798 698 5453

Sr. CASE NO. PARTIES ADVOCATES

PRONOUNCEMENT OF JUDGEMENT

1 WP/667/2010 FRESENISU KABI ONCOLOGY LTD. LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] and ORS.
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and ORS.
REMARK : [For Quashing] Note : 1)Rule granted on 22.02.2013. 2] Rule Notice duly served on R.No.2. 3] Writ
issued. 4]Cri. W.P. No.3425/2011 to 3428/2011 Cri.W.P.No.3285/2010 & 668/2010 are kept herewith. 5) As per
order dated 27/06/2018 in APPW No.211/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.667/2010 along with APPW No.210/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.3427/2011, APPW No.212/2018 in Cri.W,P.No.3428/2011, APPW No.213/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.3285/2010, APPW No.214/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.668/2010, APPW No.215/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.3425/2011 and APPW No.216/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.3426/2011 have been allowed and all the Criminal
Writ Petitions have been directed to be added to the Final Hearing board in the next Week. 6) As per order
dated 21/06/2023 in IA 2637/22, 2434/22, 2636/22, 2635/22, 2634/22, 2633/22, 2632/22 have been allowed and
all the Criminal Writ Petitions have been directed to be added to the Final Hearing board in the Week
commencing from 24.07.2023 : ## Court S.J. For Final Hearing.

WITH

WP/668/2010 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] TD. and ORS.
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA and
ORS.

REMARK: [For Quashing]##Note : 1]Rule granted on 22.02.2013, ##2]Rule Notice duly served on
R.No.2. ##3]Writ duly certified. ##4]Cri. W.P. No.3426 to 3428/11, Cri.W.P.No.3285/10 & 667/10 are
kept herewith. ##Court S.J. For Final Hearing.
WITH

22/12/2023 11:58:48 1/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 2 -

WP/3285/2010 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] TD. AND ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ANR

REMARK: (For Quashing Proceedings) ##Note:1]Rule granted on 09/07/2013,##2]Rule Notice duly


served on R.No.2 ##3]Writ duly certified ##4]Cri. W.P. No.3425 to 3428/11 Cri.W.P.No.667/10 & 668/10
are kept herewith. ##Court S.J. For Final Hearing.
WITH

WP/3425/2011 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L M/S. LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] TD AND ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ANR

REMARK: For Quashing) ##Note:1]Rule granted on 22.02.2013, ##2]Rule Notice duly served on R.No.2.
##3]Writ duly certified. #4]Cri. W.P. No.3426/2011 to 3428/2011, Cri.W.P.No.3285/2010, 667/2010 &
668/2010 are kept herewith. ##5)As per order dated 27/06/2018 in APPW No.211/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.667/2010 along with APPW No.210/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.3427/2011, APPW No.212/2018 in
Cri.W,P.No.3428/2011, APPW No.213/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.3285/2010, APPW No.214/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.668/2010, APPW No.215/2018 in Cri.W.P.No.3425/2011 and APPW No.216/2018 in
Cri.W.P.No.3426/2011 have been allowed and all the Criminal Writ Petitions have been directed to be
added to the Final Hearing board in the next Week. : ## Court S.J. For Final Hearing.
WITH

WP/3426/2011 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L M/S. LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] TD AND ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ANR

REMARK: For Quashing) ##Note:1]Rule granted on 22.02.2013. ##2]Rule Notice duly served on R.No.2
##3]Writ duly certified. ##4]Cri. W.P. No.3427/2011, 3428/11, 3425/2011, 3285/10, 667/10 & 668/10 are
kept herewith. ##Court S.J. For Final Hearing.
WITH

WP/3427/2011 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L


[Criminal] TD AND ANR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
AND ANR

REMARK: For Quashing)##Note : 1]Rule granted on 22.02.2013. ##2]Rule Notice duly served on
R.No.2.##3]Writ duly certified. ##4]Cri. W.P. No.3425, 3426, 3428/11, 3285/10,667/10 & 668/10 are kept
herewith. ##Court S.J. For Final Hearing.
WITH

WP/3428/2011 FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY L M/S. LAW GLOBAL


[Criminal] TD AND ANR
VS

22/12/2023 11:58:48 2/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 3 -

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA


AND ANR

2 APL/118/2013 SISTER URMILA D'MELLO RADHIKA KAMAT


[Criminal] VS SHRI RAKESH KUMAR SINGH
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA (RESP. NO. 2)
0
REMARK : [For Quashing CR] Note :# 1)Rule granted on 5.2.13.# 2)Order communicated.#3)Addl. compilation
filed by adv.for applicant on 16.8.13 is kept separately.(only I(i) part #4)Affidavit/Reply filed by the A.P.P. on
31/3/2015 is kept herewith separately.#5)Cri.A. 242/15 is disposed of vide court's order dt 6.6.16 #Court/DB.
For Final Hearing.

3 WP(ST)/8535/2023 RAMESH MARUTRAO PATIL Dr Yug Mohit Chaudhry


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note:-1) As per Court's order dtd 15/09/2023, the Affidavit in Reply filed by the Deputy Inspector General
of Prison, Western Zone, Pune on 18/10/2023 is kept herewith at Page Nos.67-81.#Court DB for Admission

Reporting compliance

4 WP/3695/2023 CHAITYA RAJESH SHAH S/O RAJESH Rahul Agarwal


[Criminal] SHAH S.K.Halwasia
VS S.K.Halwasia
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
In
/0/
REMARK : (For Permit to Travel Abroad) Note : 1) Cr. W.P. No. 3695 of 2023 is disposed of on 07/12/2023. 2)
Writ issued on 13/12/2023. 3) As per Court's Judgment & order dt. 07/12/2023, The Applicant has file an
affidavit-cum-undertaking with the Registrar (Judicial-I) on 11/12/2023 is kept herewith. 4) matter is due on
22/12/2023. Court (D.B.)/ for Recording Compliance.

For extension of time

5 WP/3604/2023 KENNY K.G. IBRAHIM AND ANR Marmik Shah


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
#2] Photo copies annexed are not legible-pg nos. 97-98- UT given. #3] Copy of original FIR is required- UT
given. Note:- 1) Writ issued 2) Notice issued to Respondent No.2 is not yet received duly served or unserved.
(Court DB for Order) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023 (for Extension of interim relief)

FOR SETTLEMENT / CONSENT TERMS

6 WP/2339/2023 BICHAKAL MADHAVI SIDDAPPA AND MAHESH JOSHI


[Criminal] ORS Ganesh and Co
VS LITTLE AND COMPANY
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS M/S GANESH AND CO
REMARK : (For Direction) Note: 1)Index has not been filed. V.P. paginated. 2)The photocopy annexed are legible.
UT given. Note : 1) As per Order dtd. 27.06.2023, the Advocate for petitioner has carried out amendment on
10.07.2023.#2) Notice issued to Respondent No. 3 is not yet received back duly served or unserved. #3) M/s Little
and Co. Advocate for Respondent 05 ( Vakalatnama filed) #4) Vakalatnama filed for Respondent No.2 and 4 #5) The
Affidavit of service filed on 10/10//2023, stating therein that he sent copy Petition to the Respondent No.2 to 5 are
served by Courier. The said Affidavit with Courier Receipt kept in office part.#Court D.B. for Settlement # As per
order dtd 19/12/2023

22/12/2023 11:58:48 3/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 4 -

FOR DIRECTION

7 WP/4411/2016 DOREEN DAVID AND ORS RAJENDRA SORANKAR


[Criminal] VS RESPONDENT NO. 2
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Ashok M Saraogi
REMARK : ( FOR QUASHING F.I.R. ) :: OBJECTIONS :- ## 1) Typed English translation of relevant order,
judgment is not filed U/T given. ## 2) Photo copies annexed are not legible Pg. 33,34,50,60-A to 60-
E,133,135,139,157,163,286 U/T given. ## 3) Copy not served to P.P. U/T given. ## 4) Font size is very small
pg. 90-92,170-203,265,332 U/T given. ##Note:- 1) Amendment carried out as per Court's Order dt. 06/03/2017.
##2) Notice issued to Respondent No. 2 is received back duly served. ##3)Continuation Writ issued as per
order dated 05/05/2017. ##4)Rule granted on 22/08/2017. : ## Court D.B. For Final Hearing.

8 WP/3933/2023 ROBIN RAJAN Tejas Mahamuni


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
In
/0/
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 20.12.2023.

INTERIM APPLICATIONS

9 IA/4265/2023 KAPIL DAMODAR MANSARAMANI Advani Law LLP


[Criminal] AND ORS. M/S. ADVANI AND CO. (I
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR.
In
APL/580/2020
REMARK : (For Extended Time) Note: 1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. UT
Given. 2) The photocopy/copies annexed are not legible. UT given. 3) The copy of application is not served on
the PP. UT given. 4) Small fonts pages statements annxed is required in appropriate font. UT given. 5) Typed
copy is not given of hand written pages. UT given. 6) Copy of E-mail dated 06/12/2023 2) Letter dated
13/12/2023 received from Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Esplanade Mumbai Court (SJ) for Admn

Admission_

10 WP/916/2019 DILEEP LOKURAM DHARMA MAHADIK AND ASSOCIATES


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR (Quashing FIR):- Objections:- (1)The Photocopies annexed are not legible page no.-122--U/T
Given; (2)The copy of application is not served on PP-U/T Given; (3)Hand Written pages- 120,121-U/T Given;
Court DB For Admission/Fresh.

11 WP/1233/2019 RAMDAS DAYARAM YADAV SANDESH DHANCHANDRA


[Criminal] VS MARATHE
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR.
REMARK : FOR (Quashing FIR):-##Objections:-##(1)Typed English Translation of relevant order / judgment is
not filed-U/T Given;##(2)The copy of application is not served on PP & Ors-U/T Given;##(3)Hand Written
pages- 68-97, 102-146, 152, 153-U/T Given;##Court DB For Admission/Fresh. :

12 WP/1566/2022 BACHCHULAL R. JAISWAR RANKHAMBE VISHAL VINAYAK


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

22/12/2023 11:58:48 4/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 5 -

REMARK : (FOR Direction) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.
(Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

13 WP/1819/2023 RAMESH SONYA MAVACHI VIKARANT V


[Criminal] VS PHATATE(APPOINTED ADV
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH LEGAL AID)
THROUGH JAIL
REMARK : ( For Furlough Leave ) NOTE :- 1) Applicant letter Dated 07.04.2023, Received from Through Jail
Superintendent, Nashik Road Central Prison, Jailroad, Nashik, its vide no. 5114/2023, dated 25.04.2023, has
been Numbered as Cri. W.P. 1819/2023. 2) The Petitioner Convict No. C-5640, Nashik Road Central Prison,
Jailroad, Nashik. 3) Copy served to P. P. Court D. B. for Admission / Fresh Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

14 WP/1962/2023 AMIT EKNATH RAO VINAYAK NARAYANRAO


[Criminal] VS KAMBLE(APPOINTED ADV
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH LEGAL AID)
THROUGH JAIL
REMARK : ( For Furlough Leave ) NOTE :- 1) Applicant letter Dated 26.02.2023, Received from Through Jail
Superintendent, Kolhapur Central Prison, Kalamb, Kolhapur, its vide no. 1197/2023, dated 28.02.2023, has
been Numbered as Cri. W.P. 1962/2023. 2) The Petitioner Convict No. C-3114. 3) Copy served to P. P. Court D.
B. for Admission / Fresh Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

15 WP/2967/2023 MOHD. AYUB UMER SIDDIQUI AND Babita Pandey


[Criminal] ORS
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #4] Typed copy is not given of H/W.
pages., Exh. 'G', 'I' UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

16 WP/3100/2023 BALU GAJANAN PETKAR Shubham More


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed-
UT given #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. Court DB for Admission /Fresh

17 WP/3446/2023 SIDDHARTH SHRIKANT TODANKAR Akshay Deshmukh


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Copy of original FIR is required-
UT accepted by Reg.(Jud-II). (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)

18 WP/3979/2023 KARISHMA PRADEEP AHUJA S. V. SONAWANE


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT
given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

19 WP/3980/2023 SAINATH SHIVAJI DURGE Harshad Bhadbhade


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

22/12/2023 11:58:48 5/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 6 -

REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Original FIR not filed. - UT
accepted by Registrar (Judicial-II). (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

20 WP/3981/2023 NITESH MISHRA S/O HARI KESHAV Ms Kumar and Associates


[Criminal] MISHRA
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

21 WP/3982/2023 PRAVIN SUDHAKAR JOSHI Mahesh Srinivas Vadlakonda


[Criminal] VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
THANE AND ORS
REMARK : (For Direction) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

22 WP/3983/2023 ARIF NOORMOHAMMAD ALAS GAJANAN M SAVAGAVE


[Criminal] VS
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
AND ANR
REMARK : (For Direction) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

23 WP/3985/2023 RAJIYA GULMALI SHAIKH AND ORS HARSH PARTE


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Copy of original FIR is required -
UT accepted by Registrar (Judicial-II). (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

24 WP/3986/2023 M/S SHRI AADINATH REALTY DINESH PATANKAR


[Criminal] THROUGH ITS PARTNER
SHREEKANT B ADEP
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Direction) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo copies annexed are not legible
- UT given. #4] Typed copy is not given of H/W. pages. UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation
granted for 22.12.2023.

25 WP/3987/2023 M/S PIONEER ENTERPRISES Solicis Lex


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo copies annexed are not
legible; 44, 45. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

22/12/2023 11:58:48 6/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 7 -

26 WP/3988/2023 M/S R.B. ENTERPRISES THROUGH Solicis Lex


[Criminal] MR. RAMESH B LUND
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo copies annexed are not
legible;. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

27 WP/3989/2023 RAMESH B LUND Solicis Lex


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

28 WP/3990/2023 MAHADEO ANANDRAO MAHIMAN DITENDRA MISHRA


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR Office Objection : 1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given.-- 2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.-- (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

29 WP/3991/2023 MAHENDRA KRISHNARAO PAWAR SATISH KUMBHAR


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission / Fresh)
Circulation granted for 22.12.2023.

DUE ADMISSION -

30 WP/2962/2018 ZENOBIA POONAWALA AND ANR. APPLICANTS


[Criminal] VS KAMRAN SHAIKH
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND Amol B Jagtap
ANR.
REMARK : FOR (Quashing Charge-sheet):- Objections:- (1)The Photocopies annexed are not legible page no.-
207, 208-U/T Given; Note :- 1) As per Court's order dtd. 25/09/2018, amendment carried out on 05/10/2018. 2)
APP waives notice for Respondent No.1. 3) Continuation writ issued. 4) Vakalatnama filed by Advocate for
Respondent No.2. 4) As per Order dt. 14/06/2023 and 10/10/2023, the Advocate for the Respondent no. 2 has
filed Affidavit In Reply on 23/10/2023 is kept herewith at Page Nos.385-561. Court D.B. For Admission /After
Notice.

31 WP/503/2019 VARSHA ATUL SURANA AND ANR. UMESH R MANKAPURE


[Criminal] VS
SURESH DNYANOBA KHEDEKAR
AND ORS.
REMARK : FOR (Quashing FIR):- Objections:- (1)Typed English Translation of relevant order / judgment is not filed-U/T
Given(2)Hand Written page- 31-U/T Given; Note:-(1) Spare copy for Respondent Nos. 1 to 8 are kept in office part. #2)
Additional Affidavit filed by petitioner on 08.07.2019 is kept herewith at page No. 48 to 59#3) APP waives notice on behalf of
Respondent No. 7#4) Affidavit of the Superintendent of Police, Dist. Raigad tendered in Court by APP / State which is taken on
record and kept herewith(Pagination not done properly)#5) Affidavit on behalf of the Respondent No. 1 tendered in Court by
Advocate for the Respondent No. 1 which is taken on record and kept herewith (Pagination not done properly)#6) The Page
Nos.26 to 28 are in torn condition Court DB For Admission /After Notice

22/12/2023 11:58:48 7/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 8 -

32 WP/554/2020 VIJAY SHANKAR TAVARE BHUSHAN ULHAS DESHMUKH


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR (Transfer Investigation.):- #Objections:-(1)Typed English Translation of relevant order /
judgment is not filed-U/T Given; Note : 1) Ld. APP waives notice for the Respondent -State. 1) Criminal Writ
Petition No. 6165/2019 is kept herewith 2) Cri.IA No. 884 of 2021 for interim bail is kept herewith.. 3) Affidavit
dated 22/07/2021 filed by Vinayak Badrinarayan Deshmukh, Asst. Inspector General of Police (Law and Order),
is kept herewith(Page Nos.1 to 5 Pagination not done properly) Court DB For Admission/After Notice

with

IA/884/2021 VIJAY SHANKAR TAVARE BHUSHAN ULHAS DESHMUKH


[Criminal] VS BHUSHAN ULHAS DESHMUKH
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
In
WP/554/2020

WITH

WP/6165/2019 LAXMIKANT SHRIKRUSHNA NAR THROUGH JAIL


[Criminal] VEKAR AJIT M. SAVAGAVE (APPOINT
VS MENT ADVOCATE)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
KAPIL DAVE
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE

With

IA/4111/2023 VIPNAN PRATINIDHI KAMGAR ANAND V PATWARDHAN


[Criminal] SANGHATNA AN ASSOCIATION THROUGH JAIL
VS AJIT M. SAVAGAVE (APPOINT
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MENT ADVOCATE)
AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
KAPIL DAVE
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE

With

IA/79/2023 LAXMIKANT SHRIKRUSHNA NAR THROUGH POST


[Criminal] VEKAR SHAILESH GHAG (APPOINTED
VS ADVOCATE)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Shailesh Ghag
THROUGH JAIL
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE (APPOINT
MENT ADVOCATE)
AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
KAPIL DAVE
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE

With

22/12/2023 11:58:48 8/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 9 -

IA/2863/2021 LAXMIKANT SHRIKRUSHNA NAR THROUGH POST


[Criminal] VEKAR THROUGH JAIL
VS AJIT M. SAVAGAVE (APPOINT
In THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MENT ADVOCATE)
WP/6165/2019 AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
KAPIL DAVE
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE

With

IA/924/2020 LAXMIKANT SHRIKRUSHNA NAR THROUGH POST


[Criminal] VEKAR THROUGH JAIL
VS AJIT M. SAVAGAVE (APPOINT
In THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MENT ADVOCATE)
WP/6165/2019 AJIT MAHADEV SAVAGAVE
KAPIL DAVE
AJIT M. SAVAGAVE

33 WP/618/2022 VYOMESH MAHIPATRAY SHAH AND RAJ RAUT


[Criminal] ORS. HRISHIKESH SOPAN SHINDE
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR (Quashing FIR) Objection :-1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgement is not
filed -U/T Given;2) The Photocopy / copies annexed are not legible (page no. 38, 148)3) That vakalatnama filed
but not attached at proper place.4) Small font at page no. 41 Note :1) Amendment carried out forthwith as per
courts order dated. 20.09.2022. 2) APP waives notice on behalf of the Respondent- state. 3) Vakalatnama filed
for Respondent no. 2. 4) Writ issued. Court D.B. For Admission / After Notice.

34 WP/2263/2022 ATUL VINAYCHANDRA SHAH LOKESH ZADE


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Direction) Office Objection : 1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note : 1] As per court order dated 26.08.2022, amendment carried out forthwith.#2) As per Court's order
dtd 22/09/2022, the Advocate for the Petitioner has carried out amendment on 29/09/2022. Undertaking given
to serve the amended copy of Petition to the Respondents.#3) Affidavit of Kirankumar Chandrakant
Suryavanshi, Sub Divisional Police Officer, Satara City Division, Satara filed on 13.07.2023 is kept herewith at
page No. 119 to 139.#4) As per Court's order dtd 02/08/2023, the Affidavit in Rejoinder filed by Advocate for
Petitioner on 29/08/2023 is kept herewith at page Nos.140-223. (Court DB) for Admission.

35 WP/4034/2022 JANARDAN ARVIND PARULEKAR KAMERKAR RAHUL ANANT


[Criminal] VS
(ECHCBM01004512022) STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Note : This matter is E-filled on 18.11.2022 and the Advocate has provided hard
copy. Note :- 1) As per Court's order dtd 15/12/2022, the Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment
on 23/01/2023. 2) As per order dt-20/04/2023, APP has filed Affidavit in Reply on 23/06/2023 is kept herewith at
page No.575 to 587. Court DB for Admission

36 WP/4747/2022 NANDALAL K SINGH sabiha ansari


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS

22/12/2023 11:58:48 9/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 10 -

REMARK : (For Direction ) Office Objection :1) Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note:-1) APP waives notice on behalf of the Respondent.#2) As per order dt.06/07/2023, the Advocate for
the Petitioner has carried out amendment on 17/07/2023 by adding copy of F.I.R. at Exhibit "G" from Page
Nos.172 (a) to 172 (i), relevant averments and amending the Prayer Clause (a), (b) and (c) to the Petition.
Undertaking given to serve the amended copy of Petition to the Respondents. Court D.B. for Admission / After
Notice

37 APL/1129/2023 BHARAT NARESH GUPTA DEEPAK JAMSANDEKAR


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Note : (1) Copy of application is not served to P.P. UT Given. (2) Typed copy of
FIR is at Pg. No. 23. (3) Typed copy of hand written at Pg Nos. 42,50 is not given. Court D.B. For Admission.

38 APL/1209/2023 SANTOSH BHIMMAYA BHANDARI SHAILESH S KHARAT


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Note : (1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. UT
Given. (2) Copy of application is not served to P.P. UT Given. Court D.B. For Admission. (Coram: A.S. Gadkari
and Sharmila Deshmukh, JJ.) Circulation granted for 04/10/2023 Date : 25/09/2023 For Reg.(J)

39 WP/1585/2023 VISHNU RAMCHANDRA BHAGWAT SUDATTA PATIL


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Small fonts pages statements are
annexed is required in appropriate font. U.T.Given.4] The photocopy copies annexed are not legible pages.5]
Typed copy of hand written pages is not given. U.T.Given. Court DB for Admission.

40 WP/2164/2023 BAIG SALIM ABDUL RAZZAK Abdul Kader


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note :- 1) Ld. APP waives for Respondent No.1-State. 2) The Report dtd 27/07/2023 of Kolhapur Central
Prison, Kolhapur is tendered in Court by Ld APP . Which is taken on record and kept herewith. 3) As per Court's
orders dtd 28/07/2023 and 04/09/2023, the Affidavit filed on 21.09.2023 by the Additional Director General of
Police and Inspector General of Prisons, Pune is misplaced, however to avoid inconvenience to the Hon'ble
Court the copy of the same supplied by the office of the P.P. is kept herewith at page no. 35 to 47. Court D.B.
for Admission

41 WP/3005/2023 MAHAKALI CO OPERATIVE CREDIT A V NIKHAL


[Criminal] SOCIETY LIMITED AND ORS.
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. Note : As per Order dt.04/08/2023, the Adv. for the Petitioner has carried out amendment on 10/08/2023
by adding page No.8A to 8B, 18A to 18B and to prayer clause at Page No.28A to 28B. Undertaking given to
serve amended copy of petition to P.P. Court DB for Admission

42 WP/3296/2023 PRASAD VASANT KALATE Shubham M Paygude


[Criminal] VS
COMMISSIONER OF POLICE PIMPRI
CHINCHWAD AND ORS.

22/12/2023 11:58:48 10/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 11 -

REMARK : For Direction/ Objections: 1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, judgment is not filed. U/T
given. #2) The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. Court D.B for Admission

43 WP/3364/2023 ANUBHAV BHATTER AND ANR Wesley Menezes


[Criminal] VS Pervez M Rustomkhan
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : 1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given.2] The requisite Court fee is not paid.- 250/- Note:-The Affidavit filed by the Respondent No.2 on
16/10/2023 is kept herewith at Page Nos.44-47. (Court DB for Admission)

44 WP/3397/2023 AJMAL MOHAMMAD HUSSAIN AFIN PATHAN


[Criminal] KHAN kAUSHIK M MHATRE
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : 1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given.#2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.#3] Memo not typed as per Rule No. 26
Chapter IV of Apellate Side Rule, 1960. Note :-1) As per Court's order dtd 30/08/2023, the Affidavit filed by the
Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-XI, Mumbai on 11/09/2023 is kept herewith at Page Nos.96-102. (Court
DB for Admission)

45 WP/3404/2023 AMIT KUMAR VERMA AND ANR. ashishdubey


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo copies annexed are not
legible - UT given. Note:-1) As per Court's order dtd 13/10/2023, the Advocate for the petitioner has carried out
amendment on 25/10/2023. 2) Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Bhure waives notice for and on behalf of Respondent No.2
3) Writ issued as per order dtd 13/10/2023 Court DB for Admission / After Notice.

46 WP/3700/2023 MANGAL NAGNATH PARKALE Saleel Borwandkar


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. (Court DB for Admission )

47 WP/3789/2023 TUSHAR CHANDULAL MADHANI HARSHAD V BHADBHADE


[Criminal] AND ORS
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ORS
REMARK : FOR DIRECTION / Quashing investigation . Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of
relevant order is not filed. UT given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] Photo
copies annexed are not legible - UT given. #4] Typed copy is not given of H/W. pages. UT given. #5] Small fonts
pages / statements are annexed is required in appropriate font. UT given. Note :-1) As per Court's order dtd
29/08/2023, the Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment on 08/09/2023. Court DB for Admission

48 WP/3797/2023 GANDALAL NARAYAN PATEL Amit A Tungare


[Criminal] VS
(ECHCBM01062182023) THE SENIOR POLICE INSPECTOR,
EOW, UNIT 7

22/12/2023 11:58:48 11/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 12 -

REMARK : E-Filing No.-ECHCBM01062182023 (For Quashing FIR) Note : 1) As per Court's order dated
13.10.2023, the Petition is verified. Upon going through the Petition and the prayer Clause (a),which for
quashing FIR No. 82/2021, registered in MRA Marg Police Station, Mumbai. It reveals that, the petition pertains
to the Honb'le Division Bench taking Criminal Writ Petition matters of Quashing FIR as per extent assignment.
2) As per Court's order dtd 01/12/2023, the Advocate for the petitioner has carried out amendment on
14/12/2023. (Court D.B. for Admission )

49 WP/3894/2023 SHIVA NANDAN NADAR OMPRAKASH PARIHAR


[Criminal] VS ARVINDKUMAR R MAURYA
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND
ANR
REMARK : FOR QUASHING FIR Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed.
UT given. #2] Small fonts pages / statements are annexed is required in appropriate font. UT given. Note:-
1)Mr. Arvindkumar R. Maurya Advocate for Respondent no. 02 (Vakalatnama filed) 2)Affidavit in Reply of
Respondent No. 02 filed on 01.09.2023 is kept herewith at page no. 24 to 47 Court DB for Settlement # As per
order dtd 21/12/2023.

50 WP(ST)/7288/2023 VISHNU PANDURANG DALVI AND INFINI LEGAL SOLUTIONS


[Criminal] ORS
VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
REMARK : (For Direction to Police ) Office Objection : 1) Typed English Translation of relevant order, Judgment
is not filed. UT given.2) The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given.3) Photo copies annexed are
not legible pg. Exh-J U/T given. Note-1) As per Court's order dtd 26/07/2023, the Advocate for the petitioner has
carried out amendment on 05/08/2023.#2) As per Court's order dtd 24/08/2023, the Advocate for the petitioner
has carried out amendment on 31/08/2023. Court D.B. for Admission

FOR ORDERS-

51 APL/1162/2022 SAMIR ASHOK GOYAL MAYUR SALUNKE


[Criminal] VS
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
REMARK : (For FIR Quashing) Note : 1) Application does not accompany certified copy of the FIR 272/2022. U.
T. accepted by Reg. Judl. (II). 2) English translation of relevant judgment or order is not filed. U. T. given. 3)
The copy of application is not served to P. P. U. T. given. 4) Adv. Rajesh Katore has filed VP for the Applicant on
20.03.23 (Consent obtained) 5) Amendment carried out as per Court's order dtd. 19/08/2023 by annexing
charge-sheet at pg. nos. 108-172. 6) APP waives service for the respondent No.1-State. 7) Extension notice
issued to respondent No.2, service report awaited. Court (SJ). For Orders. (Coram: A.S. Gadkari and Shyam C.
Chandak, JJ.) Circulation granted for 22/12/2023 Date : 06/12/23 For Reg.(J)

52 WP/3102/2023 MANOJ NARAYAN PUNDE Ridhima Mangaonkar


[Criminal] VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
REMARK : (For Quashing FIR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed-
UT given #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] copy of original FIR required. UT
accepted by Reg. Jud (II). Note:-1)Notice issued to Respondent No.3 is not yet received duly served or
unserved. (Court DB for Order) Circulation granted for 22.12.2023

BOTTOM OF BOARD-

53 WP/467/2021 AJARASHIRIN MOHAMMEDHUSSAIN Tassawar Sagari


[Criminal] DHARASHIVKAR
VS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

22/12/2023 11:58:48 12/13


DAILY MAIN CAUSELIST COURT NO 53-FOR FRIDAY THE 22ND DECEMBER 2023 BOMBAY HIGHCOURT - 13 -

REMARK : (For Quashing CR) Office Objection : #1] Typed English Translation of relevant order is not filed. UT
given. #2] The copy of application is not served on the PP. - UT given. #3] There are underlines / marking on.
pg. nos. 34, 42 - UT given. Court DB for Admission/ Fresh Circulation granted for 22.12.2023 ( End of the
Board)

22/12/2023 11:58:48 13/13

You might also like