Family Grief
Family Grief
Family Grief
Author manuscript
Palliat Med. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 April 13.
Author Manuscript
Abstract
Background: Research has extensively examined family members’ grief prior to the death of an
individual with a life-limiting illness but several inconsistencies in its conceptualization of related
constructs, yet significant conceptualization issues exist.
Author Manuscript
Declarations
Authorship:
J.S. was responsible for the planning, design, conduct, and reporting of the work. J.S. K.R. and W.L. were responsible for significant
edits to the manuscript and conceptually proposing the definitions in this systematic review. C.F. and T.C. helped with building the
tables and figures. K.G. performed the search in all databases and uploaded the studies into Covidence. J.S. K.R. E.M. C.F. T.C M.R.
M.W performed the study selection and data extraction. J.S. K.R. E.M. C.F. T.C M.R. M.W were involved in the data analysis and
synthesis process. All authors contributed and agreed to the final manuscript.
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship,
and/or publication of this article.
Singer et al. Page 2
Aim: This study aimed to identify and characterize studies published on family members grief
Author Manuscript
before the death of an individual with a life-limiting illness, and propose definitions based on past
studies in order to initiate conceptual clarity.
Design: A mixed-method systematic review utilized six databases and was last conducted July
10, 2021. The search strategy was developed using Medical Subject Headings. This study was
prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020166254).
Results: 134 full-text articles met inclusion criteria. This review revealed across studies a wide
variation in terminology, conceptualization, and characterization of grief before the death. More
than 18 terms and 30 definitions have been used. In many cases, the same term (e.g., anticipatory
grief) was defined differently across studies.
Conclusions: We found grief occurring before the death of a person with a life-limiting illness,
which we termed pre-death grief, is comprised of two distinct constructs: anticipatory grief
Author Manuscript
Keywords
Palliative care; Grief; Family; Caregivers; Terminally ill
medical conditions, the length of time between diagnosis and death has increased. While
the increase in life expectancy for individuals living with a life-limiting illness may have
notable benefits, there are also negative consequences for the patient2, 3 and their family
members 4, 5. For example, increasing data trends indicate that family members are likely
to experience some level of grief before the person with a life-limiting illness dies6,7. The
extent to which a family member experiences grief prior to a death occurring has been
found to predict long-term functioning in bereavement, including developing depression8
or prolonged grief disorder9, 10. However, our current understanding of grief experiences
in family members prior to the death is hampered by the lack of a universal definition,
the use of multiple terms, and inconsistent operationalization of constructs. By gaining a
comprehensive understanding of the literature examining grief in family members before
the death, researchers will be better equipped to understand what constitutes normative and
Author Manuscript
non-normative experiences of grief before the death, and to identify key intervention targets
that may decrease family members’ risk for and experience of debilitating psychological
symptoms both in the short- and long-term. Therefore, the current systematic review
aimed to identify and characterize the studies published on grief before a death for family
members5 and propose definitions grounded in extant research for the types of grief that can
occur before a death.
There has been an abundant amount of research examining family members’ grief prior to
Author Manuscript
the death of an individual with a life-limiting illness. The earliest documented definition of
this form of grief came from Lindemann11, who described it as a grief process that begins
when family members are provided advance warning of a patient’s impending death. In
her work on this topic, Rando then12 defined it as a “reaction to the impending loss of
a terminally ill loved one and to all other past and present losses related to the illness,
in addition to the mourning and all other psychosocial processes stimulated by these
losses” (p. 24). The most prominent and well-known term to describe this experience is
anticipatory grief, but a recent review of articles examining anticipatory grief found ten
different definitions used within studies13. In this review, Coelho and Barbosa13 concluded
that, when examining grief before the death, there are conceptualization issues, thereby
limiting the ability to make comparisons of findings across studies. This is problematic for
many reasons, as it hinders the potential advancement of the field in differentiating typical
Author Manuscript
Further complicating the picture is the sheer number of terms used to describe grief before
death; a concept analysis by Lindauer and Harvath14 found that there were more than 20
terms other than anticipatory grief used in the literature between 2000 and 2013. The authors
compared three terms found to be the most utilized in the literature: anticipatory grief,
pre-death grief, and chronic sorrow.14 They noted that one conceptual difference between
anticipatory grief, pre-death grief, and chronic sorrow was the likely amount of time the
person with life-limiting illness had left to live. While this effort to distinguish terms is
useful, further clarity is needed for several reasons. First, determining a patient’s prognosis
is notoriously challenging15, and so defining grief before death based on prognosis would
be correspondingly difficult. This concept analysis set important groundwork for the current
review by identifying 20 different terms (see Appendix A) to examine grief before the death,
Author Manuscript
but they only compared the three most used terms to exclusively provide a definition for
pre-death grief.
Given these limitations and an increase in studies since 20147, there is a need for an
updated and systematic understanding of the full body of literature that comprehensively
examines terms used to describe family members’ grief before the death of an individual
with a life-limiting illness. Thus, the present systematic review was undertaken to increase
conceptual clarity on this grief experience and develop a consistent definition. To advance
the field and allow for direct comparison between studies, a consistent definition is crucial.
Additionally, the use of a uniform definition could provide clearer benchmarks of what
constitutes debilitating grief before a death in order to appropriately develop and tailor
interventions.
Author Manuscript
Methods
This systemic review aimed to (1) identify and characterize the studies published on family
member grief before a death of an individual with life-limiting illness, and (2) propose a
definition for such grief that has conceptual clarity and precision and is grounded in past
research.
(via Wiley’s Cochrane Library), PsycINFO (via Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection
(via Clarivate Analytics), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature
(CINAHL) (via EBSCO). Concepts were combined with the Boolean AND operator, and the
Cochrane Handbook filter was used to exclude animal-only studies 17. A second research
informationist performed a Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS), and
edits were implemented 18. For a complete strategy, see the accompanying PubMed search
displayed in Appendix B. The six databases were comprehensively searched on February
24, 2020. The first author (JS) later conducted two updates (April 1, 2021; July 10, 2021)
and searched the six databases to identify if any new articles should be added to the review
that were published after February 24, 2020. Results were entered as Research Information
System files (i.e., standardized tag format) in Covidence, a web-based software platform for
systematic review development 19.
Author Manuscript
Selection Strategy
Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they evaluated family members’ or friend’s
grief related to an individual currently living with a life-limiting illness. Studies that
evaluated grief after the death had occurred or did not explicitly measure or refer to grief or
examined grief related to non-life limiting illness (e.g., diabetes) were excluded.
Screening Process
After duplicates were removed, abstracts were reviewed by two independent reviewers for
initial eligibility. Articles were considered for full-text review if both reviewers agreed they
met inclusion criteria. When there was disagreement between two reviewers, discrepancies
were discussed with the first and second authors. All studies that met criteria for full-text
Author Manuscript
evaluation were then independently reviewed by two reviewers and disagreements between
reviewers were discussed with the first and second author. A standardized template was
developed to extract pre-specified information from the final set of included articles.
For each article, a reviewer completed the coding template to extract the pre-determined
information from each article.
After studies were selected, they were individually entered by the authors into an Excel
table for data extraction. Authors were instructed to indicate title, authors, whether the study
was qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods, design of the study, whether prospective
or retrospective, purpose of the study, sample details (mean age, gender, race/ethnicity,
relationship to patient/deceased, disease status), key qualitative and quantitative findings,
term used to describe grief (e.g., anticipatory grief), and implications related to defining
the term. The first author (JS) organized the studies by the grief term used and conducted
a thematic synthesis of the definitions used within the terms. To interpret the results, a
thematic synthesis was performed. The synthesis began with ‘line-by-line’ coding of the
included articles (n=132), which were put into categories (i.e., term used; definition used;
measure used). These were then aggregated by term used.
Author Manuscript
Results
A total of 9,568 records were reviewed. A final set of 132 full-text articles underwent
qualitative synthesis (see Figure 1 for PRISMA). Two studies 7,20 were added from the
review of the databases on April 1, 2021 and another on July 10, 2021. Therefore, 134
full-text articles underwent thematic synthesis (see Figure 1).
The studies were predominantly quantitative (N=77; 57.46%). Thirty-three (23.88%) were
qualitative and 24 (17.91%) used mixed methods. Most of the studies were prospective
(N=110; 82.09%). Twenty (14.93%) were retrospective and four (3.00%) included both
prospective and retrospective analyses.
Participants in these studies primarily endorsed their family member was diagnosed with
Author Manuscript
dementia (N=51; 38.1%) or cancer (N=39; 29.1%) broadly. When examining the prognosis
of the individual with the life-limiting illness, most studies stated that they had “late-stage
dementia” or “advanced cancer.” For the studies that provided the relationship to the person
with the life-limiting illness, 58.0% were adult children, 28.1% were spouses/partners, and
13.9% were other relatives/friends (e.g., parents).
There were 18 different terms used to describe grief in family members of individuals
who have a life-limiting illness. The terms used were anticipatory grief (N=34), pre-death
grief (N=18), grief (N=12), pre-loss grief (N=6), caregiver grief (N=5), grief in caregivers
(N=4), and anticipatory mourning (N=4). Nineteen studies used multiple terms throughout
a single article. There were also 10 other terms that were each used only once in separate
studies. Due to the large number of articles in this systematic review, we limited our in-text
analysis to articles where the term (e.g., pre-death grief) was used in more than one article.
Author Manuscript
Therefore, we did not analyze these 10 studies. However, they are described in Table 1.
Also, there were two studies that described grief in family members of individuals who have
a life-limiting illness but did not use a specific term to describe their experience.
In addition to varied terms used to characterize grief in family members of individuals with
life-limiting illness, studies used 19 different scales to measure grief. The most prominent
were the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory (n=28), the Anticipatory Grief Scale
Author Manuscript
Anticipatory Grief
There were 54 studies identified that used anticipatory grief to describe family members’
grief while a person with a life-limiting illness was alive. However, the definitions used
for anticipatory grief differed drastically (see Table 1), and many studies used the term
anticipatory grief but failed to define it. For example, one study 21 stated that anticipatory
grief includes emotions associated with the fear of losing their significant other, whereas
another study 22 stated anticipatory grief is a profound emotional response to impending,
irreversible loss that is experienced by a family member. Overall, the first definition is
related to worry about life without the person with the life limiting illness (e.g., what am I
going to do when they pass away). However, the other study22 appears to define anticipatory
Author Manuscript
grief as a feeling of loss following diagnosis of the life limiting illness (e.g., I feel I have
already lost the person). Nine studies 23–31 used Rando’s12 definition of anticipatory grief
and two 32,33 used Lindemann’s 11 definition of anticipatory grief. Ten studies34–43 used
the term anticipatory grief, but did not define it beyond using a measure conceptualized as
measuring anticipatory grief. Finally, there was one study44 that defined anticipatory grief
as being an emotional response that is specific to a dementia (i.e., “a specific feeling of
pre-death grief in response to compound serial losses in the dementia process;” p. 1).
Of the studies that used anticipatory grief, 16 were qualitative. The remaining 38
quantitative studies used a variety of measures, with five studies using author-generated
questions that had not been psychometrically validated21,22,28,45,46. The studies using
anticipatory grief were mostly conducted with family members of patients with dementia
(N=17) or cancer (N=15). Lastly, of the studies that used the term anticipatory grief, the
Author Manuscript
Anticipatory Grief Scale was the most used measure (14 studies; 25,29,36,41,45,47–53). The
Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory 26,27,54–58 and Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief
Inventory- Short Form 24,35,40,44 was used in 11 studies.
Pre-death grief
There were 18 studies identified that used pre-death grief to describe grief experienced by
family members of a person with a life-limiting illness. Almost all 18 studies differed in
their definitions of pre-death grief. For example, Rankin and colleagues 59 defined pre-death
grief as grief experienced by family members prior to the death of the patient in response
to losses that accompany the diagnosis of a family member, whereas Mulligan 60 defined
pre-death grief as yearning for the family member to be healthy again and feeling shocked
about the person’s illness. One study 61 used Lindemann’s definition 11. Another study 62
Author Manuscript
framed grief as a spectrum, which they termed “triple grief” (i.e., grieving the loss of the
patients’ personhood, the family’s experience of loss at the time of hospice admission, and
the loss when the person dies). Two studies 20,63,64 used the term pre-death grief but did not
define it.
Most studies that used pre-death grief were quantitative (N=16) and the remainder were
qualitative (N=2). The studies that used the term pre-death grief were mostly with family
members of dementia (N=12) and cancer patients (N=3). The remaining studies included
Author Manuscript
family members of individuals with other types of life-limiting illnesses, a mixed sample,
or did not specify the illness. Of the 15 quantitative studies, most studies used the
Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory (n=4; 65–68,68, the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver
Grief Inventory- Short Form (n=4; 60,69–71), or the Prolonged Grief-12 (n=4; 20,60,62,63).
Two of the studies used multiple measures 60,63.
Grief
Twelve studies used the term, grief, to describe family members’ grief while a person with
a life-limiting illness was still alive. Five 72–76 of these studies did not provide a definition
of the term. The six studies that used grief differed in their definition of the construct.
One study 77 defined grief as the reaction to the perceived loss following the diagnosis
of a life-limiting illness. However, another study77 defined it as a “multifaceted caregiver
Author Manuscript
response” (p. 198) to death and losses of all kinds associated with the illness, including
grief related to “social” death and intellectual deterioration of a person with some form of
dementia.
Most of the studies that used the term, grief, to describe the experience of grief before
the death used mixed methods (N=7). Four were quantitative, and one qualitative. Studies
were predominantly conducted with family members of cancer (N=5) and dementia (N=4)
patients. Two of the studies used the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory72,79 and
three used the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory- Short Form 73,77,80.
Pre-Loss Grief
There were six studies identified that used pre-loss grief to describe family members’
grief while a person with a life-limiting illness was still alive 7–9,81–83. There were two
Author Manuscript
studies 7,81 that defined pre-loss grief, whereas the remaining four studies 8,9,82,83 did not
define the construct. Hudson and colleagues 81 defined pre-loss grief as follows: “Grief is
a process involving some elements of ‘loss,’ which starts before the bereavement and can
be onerous” (p.523). Singer and colleagues 7 similarly used pre-loss grief as more of an
umbrella term, defining it as either family members’ grief related to the impending loss of
their loved one and/or the loss of components of the relationship with the loved one that
existed pre-diagnosis.
All studies that used pre-loss grief were quantitative. Most of the pre-loss grief studies
included a mixed sample with respect to illness type. Only one study 8 focused on a single
specific illness (i.e., family members of individuals with a dementia). All the studies used
the Prolonged Grief-12 to measure pre-loss grief.
Author Manuscript
Caregiver Grief
There were five studies identified that used the term, caregiver grief, to describe family
members’ grief while a person with a life-limiting illness is still alive. Three of the articles
were led by the same first author and described caregiver grief as anticipation of future
losses related to physical death of a person with dementia 84–86. Marwit and Meuser
87 discussed caregiver grief as a stage-determined, internally consistent construct that is
measurable but did not provide an explicit definition. Guerrero 88 defined caregiver grief
Author Manuscript
as feelings of grief, including sadness, longing, worry, felt isolation, personal sacrifice, and
burden prior to the death of the care recipient.
Most of the studies that used caregiver grief were quantitative studies (n=4), and one used
mixed methods. The studies using the term caregiver grief were predominately conducted
with family members of dementia patients and one study included family members of
individuals with frontotemporal lobar degeneration. All five studies used some form of the
Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory.
Anticipatory Mourning
There were four studies that used the term, anticipatory mourning, to describe family
members’ grief while a person with a life-limiting illness is still alive. Each of the
four studies differed in their definition. One study 89 used Rando’s 12 definition. Clukey
Author Manuscript
Grief in Caregivers
Four studies used the term, grief in caregivers, to describe family member’s grief while a
Author Manuscript
person with a life-limiting illness is still alive. Two studies 93,94 offered definitions of grief
in caregivers, whereas two studies did not define the construct 95,96. Ott and colleagues
(2007) 93 used Rando’s 12 definition. Li and colleagues 94 defined grief in caregivers as
various physical and emotional reactions due to the various losses associated with dementia.
Three of the four studies were quantitative, and the other study used a mixed design. Three
of the studies enrolled family members of dementia patients, and one study enrolled family
members who had an acquired brain injury. One of the studies used the Marwit-Meuser-
Caregiver Grief Inventory 95, and three used the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory-
Short Form 93,93,94
There were 19 studies that used multiple terms (e.g., anticipatory grief and pre-loss grief)
within a single article to describe family members’ grief experiences. In all cases, each
of the terms were used interchangeably with the same definition applied. For example,
Carter and colleagues 97 used pre-death grief, caregiver grief, and grief interchangeably.
This study applied the same definition for each of these terms. All three constructs were
characterized as involving personal sacrifice and burden, worry and feelings of isolation,
and heartfelt sadness and longing, which are key subscales in the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver
Author Manuscript
Grief Inventory.
Discussion
This systematic review on grief experienced by family members prior to an individual’s
death to life-limiting illness revealed wide variation in the terminology used and
characterization of such grief across studies. More than 18 terms and more than 30
definitions have been used to describe this form of grief. Further, in many cases, even when
certain terms were frequently used (e.g., anticipatory grief, pre-death grief), the same term
was often defined differently across studies. For example, one study 49 defined anticipatory
grief as the process associated with grieving the eventual loss of a family member in advance
of their inevitable death, whereas another study 98 defined anticipatory grief as a series of
losses based on a loved one’s progression of cognitive and physical decline. As is evident
Author Manuscript
in this example, these definitions differ drastically, which limits the reliability and validity
of the construct and, in turn, constrains the utility of the term anticipatory grief. Similar
conceptual issues were found with and across other terms. Several studies (N=24; 17.9%)
did not define the construct at all nor provide a citation for a past study that defined
the construct. The net result is that the current conceptualization of a family member’s
grief experience prior to death lacks conceptual clarity and a precise, consistently applied
definition.
those of Lindemann’s 11 and Rando’s 12, yet less than 15% of the studies used one of these
two definitions. Other studies either used their own definition, which differed drastically
across studies using the same terms, or did not define the construct being examined. A
recent systematic review 99 examining pre-loss grief with cancer patients stated that their
results (i.e., higher pre-loss grief results in worse post-loss adjustment) were limited by
an inconsistent operationalization of pre-loss grief. Clear and consistent definitions are
necessary for other researchers to replicate findings and increase our understanding of
theoretical constructs 100. Further, Drost 101 found using multiple definitions to define the
same construct can diminish reliability, as well as internal and external validity. Therefore,
providing a universal definition of a construct can lead to an advancement of the field,
allowing multiple researchers to examine the same construct and compare studies. For
example, Holley’s 49 study and Pote and colleagues’ 57 investigation, which both used the
Author Manuscript
term anticipatory grief, could not be appropriately compared because their definitions varied.
The lack of uniformity of the definitions, coupled with studies not defining the construct,
further increases the difficulty of comparing research findings and, importantly, limits the
clinical utility of the constructs.
It was beyond the scope of this systematic review to examine the psychometric properties of
individual instruments and homegrown questions used to measure grief in family members
the definitions used and the measures used is salient to the focus of the paper. There
were numerous instruments used to measure grief before death, which is not uncommon or
specific to the grief literature. However, the articles that were identified in this systematic
review differed drastically in their definition of the construct of grief before a death,
despite often using the same scale. For example, Guererro 88 used the Marwit-Meuser-
Caregiver Grief Inventory and defined the construct as sadness, longing, worry, felt isolation,
personal sacrifice, and burden, whereas York and colleagues 58 also used the Marwit-
Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory and defined the construct as grief related to anticipation
of the forthcoming loss of a family member. Not only were different definitions used in
studies using the same scales, but the same scale was used across terms, such as use of
the Marwit-Meuser-Caregiver Grief Inventory to measure more than 6 different constructs.
Thus, it is unclear whether the terms and the measures in fact reflect separate, distinct
Author Manuscript
Limitations
Findings from this systematic review should be considered in the context of some
limitations. First, this systematic review only focused on articles that were published in
English or for which translations were available. It should be noted that 14 studies during the
initial review were excluded for which translation could not be found. Second, this review
only included studies that examined grief in family members of individuals with life-limiting
illnesses and not other chronic medical (e.g., diabetes) or mental (e.g., schizophrenia)
illnesses over which family members may grieve. Third, this study was limited in that it only
examined published research articles and thus may have missed studies that were started
during the pandemic that examined COVID-19 and grief before the loss. Finally, we did not
Author Manuscript
Proposed Definitions
In synthesizing the results of this study, two overarching conceptualizations of grief
occurring before the person with a life-limiting illness has died emerged: grief around the
anticipated death of the person and grief associated with losses that occur throughout the
illness trajectory. In light of the differences between definitions noted in this systematic
review and the overlaps between constructs, we have attempted to provide clarity in the
following proposed definitions. Under the umbrella category that we propose be termed pre-
death grief, we propose two separate constructs: anticipatory grief and illness-related grief.
Anticipatory grief is future-oriented and defined as a family members’ grief experience
while the person with the life-limiting illness is alive but that is focused on feared or
Author Manuscript
anticipated losses that will occur after the person’s death. Anticipatory grief includes worry
about a future without the person with the life-limiting illness being physically present and
feeling sad about future losses related to the deceased person. Many studies defined the
construct of grief prior to a loss as the anticipation of future losses related to the physical
death of a person (e.g., 23,24,26–28). Using our proposed definition, these studies would be
measuring anticipatory grief.
Illness-related grief is, on the other hand, present-oriented. More specifically, illness-related
Author Manuscript
grief includes grief related to current or ongoing losses experienced during the illness
trajectory, such as loss of roles or loss of physical functioning. Some studies (e.g., 7,60)
provided a definition of grief before a death that would fit under illness-related grief when
they defined the construct as longing and yearning for the family member to be as they were
before the illness. We would expand on this definition and state that illness-related grief is
the experience of grief before the death of a family member that relates to the numerous,
multiplicative losses that can be incurred when a family member has a life-limiting illness.
For example, a person might experience intense feelings of emotional pain, sorrow, or pangs
of grief related to the family member’s functional impairment and wish they were able to do
what they used to be able to do.
Consistent use of these two constructs as we have defined them could provide the field
with uniformity, facilitating advancement of the study of pre-death grief. Importantly, the
Author Manuscript
definitions identified through this systematic review would not be able to differentiate if
a person has anticipatory grief, illness-related grief, or both anticipatory grief and illness-
related grief. While anticipatory grief and illness-related grief, may be distinguished, they
may both be experienced by family members. Future research can further examine methods
of measuring these distinct constructs in order to more effectively identify family members
in need of support for pre-death grief and to establish intervention targets relevant to the type
of grief they are experiencing.
Despite grief before the death of an individual with life-limiting illness being studied for
more than 80 years with more than 130 studies identified, this systematic review provides
evidence that there is no consistent definition of this construct and identifies numerous
related limitations within the current body of literature that examines grief before death.
Author Manuscript
These limitations appear to be hindering the advancement of the grief field. This study
is novel as it provides the field with consistent terms: pre-death grief, anticipatory grief,
and illness-related grief, as described above, which will facilitate clinical research to
1) replicating results, 2) better differentiating normative pre-death grief from impairing
pre-death grief, 3) identifying of risk and protective factors for developing impairing
pre-death grief, as well as the extent to which pre-death grief may be a risk factor for
negative bereavement outcomes such as prolonged grief disorder, 4) developing and testing
interventions to reduce distressing and impairing pre-death grief, and 5) understanding
if there are differences in presentation of pre-death grief depending on the patient’s
illness (e.g., cancer; dementia). In a future report, we will also examine the psychometric
properties of the scales identified in this systematic review to continue refining the
field’s conceptualization grief before death and to ultimately offer guidance on which
Author Manuscript
measures may be most clinically useful. Additionally, future work should aim to examine
pre-death grief from an interdisciplinary perspective by identifying possible biological,
neuropsychological, and developmental influences in order to create more interdisciplinary
interventions to mitigate pre-death grief. More specifically, due to the interdisciplinary
nature of the work examining pre-death grief, a greater understanding of the neurobiological
underpinnings of pre-death grief in family members is warranted and if these underpinnings
differ depending on the patient’s illness,
care for family members of individuals with life-limiting illness before and after
bereavement. A central component of palliative care is attending to the needs of family
members through bereavement, but palliative care clinicians are understandably fulfilling
many roles that hinder their ability to do so. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic,
palliative care professionals are spread thinner156, 157. Having a greater understanding of
the manifestations of pre-death grief, as well as ways to briefly assess for pre-death grief
and provide targeted intervention could better equip palliative care clinicians to provide
care to those most in need. Further, intervening to assuage pre-death grief can place family
members in a better position to cope with the challenges of bereavement and reduce their
risk for bereavement-related mental health challenges158.
It would be neglectful to not mention the relationship between pre-death grief and family
members’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. At this time, there are no empirical
Author Manuscript
studies that have examined COVID-19 and pre-death grief, but several commentaries
and reviews have discussed the implications of COVID-19 on pre-death grief. First, one
commentary159, which used the term pre-loss grief, highlights that families face novel
challenges when the person with COVID-19 becomes critically ill, including physical
separation due to fear of COVID-19 being spread and the lack of preparedness for the death,
which has been shown to increase pre-death grief and prolonged grief disorder. Another
commentary160 focused on the role of front-line workers who are uniquely positioned
to provide critically needed psychosocial support to bereaved family members, yet who
are also experiencing unprecedented levels of burnout. This speaks to the need for brief
assessment and interdisciplinary intervention approaches that not only provide bereavement-
conscious care to families but also seek to reduce systemic barriers to providing care. Also,
palliative care clinicians could be involved earlier in the illness trajectory to help reduce
Author Manuscript
pre-death grief in the family member. Therefore, palliative care doctors should be trained on
assessing pre-death grief in family members of individuals with COVID-19. This systematic
review and proposed definitions provide the ability to differentiate normative pre-death grief
from impairing levels of grief and identify risk factors for developing pre-death grief in
family members of individuals with life-limiting illness. This will hopefully result in an
increase in targeted interventions for family members who have pre-death grief as well as
the provision of support to reduce poor bereavement outcomes.
Acknowledgment:
We would like to thank Anthony Papa for his thoughtful comments during this project.
Funding:
Author Manuscript
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article
APPENDIX
Author Manuscript
Appendix
Appendix A.
Terms for Pre-death grief found in the literature, 2000– 2013 in Lindauer & Harvath (2014)
study
#9) #1 OR #2 OR #3 OR #4 OR #5 OR #6 OR #7 OR #8
6. Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (via EBSCO)
((MH “Caregivers+”) OR (MH “Family”) OR (MH “Adult Children+”) OR (MH
“Extended Family+”) OR (MH “Family Characteristics”) OR (MH “Parenthood+”) OR
(MH “Stepfamilies+”) OR (MH “Family Functioning+”) OR (MH “Family Relations+”) OR
Author Manuscript
References
1. World Health Organization: the top 10 cause of death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/
detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death (2020).
2. Kreuter M, Bendstrup E, Russell A-M, et al. Palliative care in interstitial lung disease: living well.
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine 2017; 5: 968–980. [PubMed: 29033267]
3. Lindell KO, Kavalieratos D, Gibson KF, et al. The palliative care needs of patients with idiopathic
pulmonary fibrosis: A qualitative study of patients and family caregivers. Heart & Lung 2017; 46:
24–29. [PubMed: 27871724]
Author Manuscript
4. Chung ML, Lennie TA, Mudd-Martin G, et al. Depressive symptoms in patients with heart failure
negatively affect family caregiver outcomes and quality of life. European Journal of Cardiovascular
Nursing 2016; 15: 30–38. [PubMed: 24829295]
5. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Committee on Approaching Death: Addressing Key End-of-Life Issues.
Dying in America : improving quality and honoring individual preferences near the end of life.
Washington, DC US: The National Academies Press, 2015.
6. Nielsen MK, Carlsen AH, Neergaard MA, et al. Looking beyond the mean in grief trajectories:
A prospective, population-based cohort study. Social Science & Medicine 2019; 232: 460–469.
[PubMed: 31230666]
7. Singer J, Shrout MR, Papa A. Rates and prospective psychosocial correlates of pre-loss grief in
cancer and dementia family members. J Health Psychol 2021; 135910532199594.
8. Givens JL, Prigerson HG, Kiely DK, et al. Grief among family members of nursing home
residents with advanced dementia. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2011; 19: 543–
550. [PubMed: 21606897]
Author Manuscript
9. Nielsen MK, Neergaard MA, Jensen AB, et al. Preloss grief in family caregivers during end-of-life
cancer care: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Psycho-Oncology 2017; 26: 2048–2056.
[PubMed: 28271588]
10. Prigerson HG, Boelen PA, Xu J, et al. Validation of the new DSM-5-TR criteria for prolonged grief
disorder and the PG-13-Revised ( PG-13-R ) scale. World Psychiatry 2021; 20: 96–106. [PubMed:
33432758]
11. Lindemann E. Symptomatology and management of acute grief. Essential papers on object loss
1994; 18–31.
12. Rando TA Grief, dying, and death: Clinical interventions for caregivers. Research PressPub, 1984.
13. Coelho A, Barbosa A. Family Anticipatory Grief: An Integrative Literature Review. American
Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 2017; 34: 774–785. [PubMed: 27151972]
Author Manuscript
14. Lindauer A, Harvath TA. Pre-death grief in the context of dementia caregiving: A concept analysis.
Journal of Advanced Nursing 2014; 70: 2196–2207. [PubMed: 24702153]
15. Widera EW, Rosenfeld KE, Fromme EK, et al. Approaching Patients and Family Members Who
Hope for a Miracle. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 2011; 42: 119–125. [PubMed:
21641763]
16. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews:
development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2021; 134: 103–
112. [PubMed: 33577987]
17. Higgins JP, Eldridge S, Li T. Including variants on randomized trials. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas
J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for
Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available
from wwwtrainingcochraneorg/handbook.
18. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, et al. CADTH Methods and Guidelines: PRESS Peer
Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Explanation and Elaboration. CADTH:
Author Manuscript
solving among family caregivers of persons with cognitive impairment. Journal of Aging and
Health 2013; 25: 493–509. [PubMed: 23428394]
26. Holley CK, Mast BT. Predictors of anticipatory grief in dementia caregivers. Clinical
Gerontologist: The Journal of Aging and Mental Health 2010; 33: 223–236.
27. Ross A, Dagley JC. An assessment of anticipatory grief as experienced by family caregivers of
individuals with dementia. Alzheimer’s Care Today 2009; 10: 8–21.
28. Swensen CH, Fuller SR. Expression of Love, Marriage Problems, Commitment, and Anticipatory
Grief in the Marriages of Cancer Patients. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1992; 54: 191.
29. Theut SK, Jordan L, Ross LA, et al. Caregiver’s Anticipatory Grief in Dementia: A Pilot Study. Int
J Aging Hum Dev 1991; 33: 113–118. [PubMed: 1955206]
30. Toyama H, Honda A. Using Narrative Approach for Anticipatory Grief Among Family Caregivers
at Home (vol 3, 2333393616682549, 2016). Global Qualitative Nursing Research; 4. Epub ahead
of print April 2017. DOI: 10.1177/2333393617729287.
31. Walker RJ, Pomeroy EC, McNeil JS, et al. Anticipatory grief and AIDS: strategies for intervening
with caregivers. Health Soc Work 1996; 21: 49–57. [PubMed: 8626158]
Author Manuscript
32. Giannone-Tyler R. Elder spousal loss: Understanding the experience of elderly women grieving
the death of their husbands. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and
Engineering 2016; 77: No-Specified.
33. Higgs EJ, McClaren BJ, Sahhar MA, et al. ‘A short time but a lovely little short time’: Bereaved
parents’ experiences of having a child with spinal muscular atrophy type 1. Journal of Paediatrics
& Child Health 2016; 52: 40–46. [PubMed: 26437687]
34. Albinsson L, Strang P. Existential Concerns of Families of Late-Stage Dementia Patients:
Questions of Freedom, Choices, Isolation, Death, and Meaning. Journal of Palliative Medicine
2003; 6: 225–235. [PubMed: 12854939]
35. Areia NP, Fonseca G, Major S, et al. Psychological morbidity in family caregivers of people living
with terminal cancer: Prevalence and predictors. Palliative & Supportive Care 2019; 17: 286–293.
Author Manuscript
[PubMed: 29478419]
36. Burke LA, Clark KA, Ali KS, et al. Risk Factors for Anticipatory Grief in Family Members of
Terminally Ill Veterans Receiving Palliative Care Services. J Soc Work End Life Palliat Care 2015;
11: 244–266. [PubMed: 26654060]
37. Collins A, Hennessy-Anderson N, Hosking S, et al. Lived experiences of parents caring for a
child with a life-limiting condition in Australia: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine 2016; 30:
950–959. [PubMed: 26951065]
38. Dighe M, Jadhav S, Muckaden M, et al. Parental concerns in children requiring palliative care.
Indian J Palliat Care 2008; 14: 16.
39. Duke S. An exploration of anticipatory grief: the lived experience of people during their spouses’
terminal illness and in bereavement. J Adv Nurs 1998; 28: 829–839. [PubMed: 9829672]
40. Hicken BL, Daniel C, Luptak M, et al. Supporting Caregivers of Rural Veterans Electronically
(SCORE). Journal of Rural Health 2017; 33: 305–313.
41. Meuser TM, Marwit SJ. A comprehensive, stage-sensitive model of grief in dementia caregiving.
Author Manuscript
55. Fronzaglia TA. Anticipatory grief in rural Alzheimer’s caregivers. Dissertation Abstracts
International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2009; 69: 6410.
Author Manuscript
56. Neyshabouri MD, Tabibi Z, Maghsoudi A, et al. Research Paper: Contribution of Time Since
Diagnosis in Anticipatory Grief of Mothers of Children Diagnosed With Cancer: A Descriptive
Study in Iran. 2018; 6: 7.
57. Pote SC, Wright SL. Evaluating anticipatory grief as a moderator of life and marital satisfaction for
spousal caregivers of individuals with dementia. Educational Gerontology 2018; 44: 196–207.
58. York T. BURDEN AND ANTICIPATORY GRIEF IN CAREGIVERS OF PARENTS OR
SPOUSES WITH ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE. Capella University, 2016.
59. Rankin SR. Influence of Coping Styles on Social Support Seeking Among
Cancer Patient Family Caregivers. Walden University, http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=cin20&AN=109857273&site=ehost-live (2011).
60. Mulligan EA. Grief among dementia caregivers: A comparison of two assessment
systems. Washington University in St. Louis, http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=cin20&AN=109857612&site=ehost-live (2011).
61. Holm M, Arestedt K, Ohlen J, et al. Variations in grief, anxiety, depression, and health among
Author Manuscript
family caregivers before and after the death of a close person in the context of palliative home
care. Death Studies; 1–9.
62. Kiely DK, Prigerson H, Mitchell SL, et al. Health care proxy grief symptoms before the death of
nursing home residents with advanced dementia. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2008;
16: 664–673.
63. Breen LJ, Aoun SM, O’Connor M, et al. Effect of caregiving at end of life on grief, quality
of life and general health: A prospective, longitudinal, comparative study. Palliat Med 2019;
026921631988076.
64. Holm M, Arestedt K, Alvariza A. Associations between Predeath and Postdeath Grief in
Family Caregivers in Palliative Home Care. Journal of Palliative Medicine 2019; 22: 1530–1535.
[PubMed: 31225778]
65. Liew TM. Applicability of the pre-death grief concept to dementia family caregivers in Asia.
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2016; 31: 749–754. [PubMed: 26555857]
66. Liew TM, Yeap BI, Koh GC-H, et al. Detecting predeath grief in family caregivers of persons with
Author Manuscript
dementia: Validity and utility of the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory in a multiethnic
Asian population. The Gerontologist 2018; 58: e150–e159. [PubMed: 28633382]
67. Liew TM, Tai BC, Yap P, et al. Contrasting the risk factors of grief and burden in caregivers of
persons with dementia: Multivariate analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2018;
No-Specified.
68. Marwit SJ, Chibnall JT, Dougherty R, et al. Assessing pre-death grief in cancer caregivers using
the Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory (MM-CGI). Psychooncology 2008; 17: 300–303.
[PubMed: 17518412]
69. Jain FA, Connolly CG, Moore LC, et al. Grief, Mindfulness and Neural Predictors of Improvement
in Family Dementia Caregivers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience; 13. Epub ahead of print May
2019. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00155.
70. Kobiske KMR. Pre-death grief, resourcefulness and perceived stress among caregivers of partners
with young onset dementia. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and
Engineering 2018; 79: No-Specified.
71. Romero MM, Ott CH, Kelber ST. Predictors of grief in bereaved family caregivers of person’s with
Author Manuscript
Alzheimer’s disease: a prospective study. Death Stud 2014; 38: 395–403. [PubMed: 24666146]
72. Adams KB, Sanders S. Alzheimer’s caregiver differences in experience of loss, grief reactions
and depressive symptoms across stage of disease: A mixed-method analysis. Dementia: The
International Journal of Social Research and Practice 2004; 3: 195–210.
73. Chan WCH, Wong B, Kwok T, et al. Assessing grief of family caregivers of people with dementia:
Validation of the Chinese version of the Marwit-Meuser caregiver grief inventory. Health & Social
Work 2017; 42: 151–158. [PubMed: 28575234]
74. Coelho AM, Delalibera MA, Barbosa A. Palliative care caregivers’ grief mediators: A prospective
study. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 2016; 33: 346–353. [PubMed:
Author Manuscript
25601321]
75. Hinton J. Can home care maintain an acceptable quality of life for patients with terminal cancer
and their relatives? Palliat Med 1994; 8: 183–196. [PubMed: 7952369]
76. Stajduhar KI, Martin W, Cairns M. What makes grief difficult? Perspectives from bereaved family
caregivers and healthcare providers of advanced cancer patients. Palliat Support Care 2010; 8:
277–289. [PubMed: 20875171]
77. Sanders S, Ott CH, Kelber ST, et al. The experience of high levels of grief in caregivers of
persons with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia. Death Stud 2008; 32: 495–523. [PubMed:
18958942]
78. Waldrop DP. Caregiver grief in terminal illness and bereavement: a mixed-methods study. Health
Soc Work 2007; 32: 197–206. [PubMed: 17896676]
79. Warchol-Biedermann K, Mojs E, Gregersen R, et al. What causes grief in dementia caregivers?
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 2014; 59: 462–467. [PubMed: 25042576]
80. Ott CH, Kelber ST, Blaylock M. ‘Easing the way’ for spouse caregivers of individuals with
Author Manuscript
85. Liew TM, Tai BC, Yap P, et al. Development and validation of a simple screening tool for caregiver
grief in dementia caregiving. BMC Geriatrics 2019; 19: N.PAG-N.PAG.
86. Liew TM, Yap P. A Brief, 6-Item Scale for Caregiver Grief in Dementia Caregiving. Gerontologist
2020; 60: e1–e10. [PubMed: 30544229]
87. Marwit SJ, Meuser TM. Development and initial validation of an inventory to assess grief in
caregivers of persons with Alzheimer’s disease. The Gerontologist 2002; 42: 751–765. [PubMed:
12451156]
88. Guerrero S. Grief in spousal caregivers of persons with frontotemporal lobar degeneration:
Exploring the relationship between challenging behaviors and caregiver grief. Dissertation
Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2012; 72: 5570.
89. Rini A, Loriz L. Anticipatory mourning in parents with a child who dies while hospitalized.
Journal of Pediatric Nursing 2007; 22: 272–282. [PubMed: 17645955]
90. Clukey L. Anticipatory mourning: Transitional processes of expected loss. Dissertation Abstracts
International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 2003; 63: 3467.
91. Anngela-Cole L, Busch M. Stress and grief among family caregivers of older adults with cancer:
Author Manuscript
A multicultural comparison from Hawai’i. Journal of Social Work in End-of-Life & Palliative Care
2011; 7: 318–337. [PubMed: 22150177]
92. Bielek S. Goodbye seems to be the hardest word: A phenomenological analysis of parents’
anticipatory mourning of a child’s impending death. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section
B: The Sciences and Engineering 2008; 69: 3259.
93. Ott CH, Sanders S, Kelber ST. Grief and personal growth experience of spouses and adult-child
caregivers of individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. Gerontologist 2007; 47:
798–809. [PubMed: 18192633]
94. Li J, Li Y, Li P. Perceived Grief Among Caregivers of Patients With Dementia in China. Clin Nurs
Res 2019; 1054773819839265.
Author Manuscript
95. MacCourt P, McLennan M, Somers S, et al. Effectiveness of a Grief Intervention for Caregivers
of People With Dementia. Omega: Journal of Death & Dying 2017; 75: 230–247. [PubMed:
28701116]
96. Marwit SJ, Kaye PN. Measuring grief in caregivers of persons with acquired brain injury. Brain
Injury 2006; 20: 1419–1429. [PubMed: 17378234]
97. Carter JH, Lyons KS, Lindauer A, et al. The experience of pre-death grief in Parkinson’s
caregivers: A pilot study. Movement Disorders 2012; 27: S300–S300.
98. Pote SC. The Moderating Effect of Anticipatory Grief on the Relationship Between Attachment
and Perceived Closeness with Satisfaction of Life and Marriage for Spousal Caregivers of
Individuals with Dementia. 246.
99. Treml J, Schmidt V, Nagl M, et al. Pre-loss grief and preparedness for death among caregivers of
terminally ill cancer patients: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 2021; 284: 114240.
100. Yaniv E. Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization. AMR 2011; 36: 590–
592.
Author Manuscript
101. Drost EA. Validity and Reliability in Social Science Research. 21.
102. Read JR, Sharpe L, Modini M, et al. Multimorbidity and depression: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Journal of Affective Disorders 2017; 221: 36–46. [PubMed: 28628766]
103. Al-Gamal E, Long T, Livesley J. Development of a modified instrument to measure
anticipatory grieving in Jordanian parents of children diagnosed with cancer: the Marwit and
Meuser Caregiver Inventory Childhood Cancer. Cancer Nursing 2009; 32: 211–219. [PubMed:
19295424]
104. Benfield CG. Comparing the anticipatory grief response of mothers and fathers in a neonatal
intensive care setting. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and
Engineering 1996; 56: 7090.
105. Beng TS, Guan NC, Seang LK, et al. The experiences of suffering of palliative care informal
caregivers in Malaysia: A thematic analysis. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
2013; 30: 473–489. [PubMed: 23341445]
106. Bonanno GA, Wortman CB, Lehman DR, et al. Resilience to loss and chronic grief: A
Author Manuscript
prospective study from preloss to 18-months postloss. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology 2002; 83: 1150–1164. [PubMed: 12416919]
107. Bouchal SR, Rallison L, Moules NJ, et al. Holding on and letting go: Families’ experiences of
anticipatory mourning in terminal cancer. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying 2015; 72: 42–68.
108. Broom A, Parker RB, Kenny K. Authenticity, ambivalence and recognition in caring at
the end of life and beyond. Soc Sci Med; 239. Epub ahead of print 2019. DOI: 10.1016/
j.socscimed.2019.112554.
109. Burke LA, Neimeyer RA, Bottomley JS, et al. Prospective Risk Factors for Intense Grief in
Family Members of Veterans Who Died of Terminal Illness. Illness, Crisis & Loss 2019; 27:
147–171.
110. Butler LD, Field NP, Busch AL, et al. Anticipating loss and other temporal stressors predict
traumatic stress symptoms among partners of metastatic/recurrent breast cancer patients. Psycho-
Oncology 2005; 14: 492–502. [PubMed: 15452896]
111. Carr D, House JS, Wortman C, et al. Psychological adjustment to sudden and anticipated spousal
loss among older widowed persons. The Journals of Gerontology: Series B: Psychological
Author Manuscript
115. Chentsova-Dutton Y, Shucter S, Hutchin S, et al. Depression and grief reactions in hospice
caregivers: From pre-death to 1 year afterwards. Journal of Affective Disorders 2002; 69: 53–60.
Author Manuscript
[PubMed: 12103452]
116. Clukey L. ‘Just be there!’: The experience of anticipatory grief. Dissertation Abstracts
International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering 1997; 58: 1208.
117. D’Antonio J. Caregiver Grief and Anticipatory Mourning. Journal of Hospice & Palliative
Nursing 2014; 16: 99–104.
118. Dempsey L, Dowling M, Larkin P, et al. Providing care for a person with late-stage dementia at
home: What are carers’ experiences? Dementia (14713012) 2020; 19: 352–374.
119. Dionne-Odom JN, Azuero A, Lyons KD, et al. Family Caregiver Depressive Symptom and Grief
Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Pain & Symptom
Management 2016; 52: 378–385. [PubMed: 27265814]
120. Duggleby WD, Williams A, Holstlander L, et al. Hope of rural women caregivers of persons with
advanced cancer: guilt, self-efficacy and mental health. Rural & Remote Health 2014; 14: 1–13.
121. Elliott D, Dale C. Anticipatory grief and people with learning disabilities. Learning Disability
Practice 2007; 10: 28–31.
Author Manuscript
122. Evans DM. The experience of anticipatory grief among individuals living with cancer, their
primary caregivers, and families. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences
and Engineering 2009; 69: 5021.
123. Ford JL, Linde BD, Gigliotti C, et al. Grief experiences of 3 caregiving wives of veterans with
dementia. American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine 2013; 30: 137–145. [PubMed:
22611236]
124. Francis LE, Kypriotakis G, O’Toole EE, et al. Grief and risk of depression in context: the
emotional outcomes of bereaved cancer caregivers. Omega (Westport) 2015; 70: 351–379.
[PubMed: 26036059]
125. Frank JB. Evidence for grief as the major barrier faced by Alzheimer caregivers: A qualitative
analysis. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias 2008; 22: 516–527.
126. Garand L, Lingler JH, Deardorf KE, et al. Anticipatory grief in new family caregivers of persons
with mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders
2012; 26: 159–165. [PubMed: 21946013]
Author Manuscript
127. Gilliland G, Fleming S. A comparison of spousal anticipatory grief and conventional grief. Death
Stud 1998; 22: 541–569. [PubMed: 10342940]
128. Gunnarsson H, Ohlen J. Spouses’ grief before the patient’s death: Retrospective experiences
related to palliative home care in urban Sweden. Mortality 2006; 11: 336–351.
129. Hampe SO. Needs of the grieving spouse in a hospital setting. Nurs Res 1975; 24: 113–120.
[PubMed: 1038616]
130. Hill CD, Thompson LW, Gallagher D. The role of anticipatory bereavement in older women’s
adjustment to widowhood. The Gerontologist 1988; 28: 792–796. [PubMed: 3253148]
131. Hisamatsu M, Shinchi H, Tsutsumi Y. Experiences of spouses of patients with cancer from
the notification of palliative chemotherapy discontinuation to bereavement: A qualitative study.
European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2020; 45: 101721.
132. Holley CK, Mast BT. The impact of anticipatory grief on caregiver burden in dementia caregivers.
Gerontologist 2009; 49: 388–396. [PubMed: 19386826]
133. Holm M, Alvariza A, Fürst C-J, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the anticipatory grief scale in
a sample of family caregivers in the context of palliative care. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2019;
Author Manuscript
136. Kilty C, Boland P, Goodwin J, et al. Caring for People With Young Onset Dementia: An
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Family Caregivers’ Experiences. J Psychosoc Nurs
Author Manuscript
147. Riley GA, Fisher G, Hagger BF, et al. The Birmingham Relationship Continuity Measure: the
development and evaluation of a measure of the perceived continuity of spousal relationships in
dementia. International Psychogeriatrics 2013; 25: 263–274. [PubMed: 23174150]
148. Saldinger A, Cain AC. Deromanticizing Anticipated Death: Denial, Disbelief and Disconnection
in Bereaved Spouses. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology 2004; 22: 69–92.
149. Tomarken A, Holland J, Schachter S, et al. Factors of complicated grief pre-death in caregivers of
cancer patients. Psycho-Oncology 2008; 17: 105–111. [PubMed: 17443644]
150. van Doorn C, Kasl SV, Beery LC, et al. The influence of marital quality and attachment styles
on traumatic grief and depressive symptoms. J Nerv Ment Dis 1998; 186: 566–573. [PubMed:
9741563]
151. Walker RJ, Pomeroy EC. Depression or Grief? The Experience of Caregivers of People with
Dementia. Health & Social Work 1996; 21: 247–254. [PubMed: 8911956]
152. Walker RJ, Pomeroy EC. The Impact of Anticipatory Grief on Caregivers of Persons with
Alzheimer’s Disease. Home Health Care Services Quarterly 1997; 16: 55–76.
153. Welch D. Anticipatory Grief Reactions in Family Members of Adult Patients. null 1982; 4:
Author Manuscript
149–158.
154. Wong MS, Chan SWC. The experiences of Chinese family members of terminally ill patients - a
qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007; 16: 2357–2364. [PubMed: 18036125]
155. Zordan RD, Bell ML, Price M, et al. Long-term prevalence and predictors of prolonged grief
disorder amongst bereaved cancer caregivers: A cohort study. Palliative & Supportive Care 2019;
17: 507–514. [PubMed: 30767818]
156. Roberts KE, Lichtenthal WG, Ferrell B. Being a Bereavement-Conscious Hospice and Palliative
care clinician. Journal of Hospice and Palliative Nursing 2021, 23, 293–295. [PubMed:
34185724]
157. Lichtenthal WG, Roberts KE, Ferrell B. Bereavement care: Walking the walk. Journal of
Palliative Medicine 2021 24, 805–806. [PubMed: 34061671]
Author Manuscript
158. Roberts KE, Jankauskaite G, Slivjak E, Rubin L, Schachter S, Stabler S, Wiener L, Prigerson H,
& Lichtenthal WG. Bereavement Risk Screening: A Pathway to Psychosocial Oncology Care.
Psycho-Oncology 2020, 29, 2041–2047. [PubMed: 32840939]
159. Singer J, Spiegel JA, Papa A. Preloss Grief in Family Members of COVID-19 Patients:
Recommendations for Clinicians and Researchers. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research,
Practice, and Policy.
160. Lichtenthal WG, Roberts KE, Prigerson HG. Bereavement care in the wake of COVID-19:
offering condolences and referrals.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Key Statements
Author Manuscript
• Current evidence suggests that grief before the death in family members of
individuals with a life-limiting illness is a robust predictor of prolonged grief
disorder.
studies (e.g., more than 18 terms and more than 30 definitions have been used
to describe this form of grief).
• In many cases, even when certain terms were frequently used (e.g.,
anticipatory grief, pre-death grief), the same term was often defined
differently across studies.
Figure 1.
Author Manuscript
Table 1.
Articles Examining Family Members’ Grief Prior to the Death of Individuals with a Life-limiting Illness
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Singer et al.
AG is the process
of mourning, coping,
Develop a modified interaction, planning
version of MM-CGI for n = 140 and psychological
Al-Gamal et the assessment of AG Mmothers = 34.4 (6.93), reorganization that are
Quant Oncology among Jordanian parents Cancer Mfathers = 39.5(8.62) MM-CGI-CC AG stimulated and are in
al. (2009) 103 of children with cancer Fnewly: 57; mnewly: 13; response to the impending
(the MM-CGI Childhood f6–12: 42; m6–12: 28 loss of a loved one and the
Cancer) recognition of associated
losses in the past, present
and future
AM is time-limited: the
uncertainty surrounding
Investigate stress, AM, n = 56 the amount of time a loved
Anngela-Cole and cultural-practices M = 57.9, SD = not Qual interview one has left often creates
Qual Oncology Terminal cancer AM
among family caregivers provided guide a more concentrated
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
instead defined by these
study of
Singer et al.
16 items
derived from
Examine whether the
Bonanno et al. bereaved individuals n = 205 Bereavement
Grief is a reaction to
Explore the retrospective
Bouchal et al. separation, and in the case
experiences of AG in n=8 Qual interview
Qual Oncology Cancer AG, AM of AG, it is a reaction to
(2015) 107 eight families of people M = not provided guide
the threat of death rather
with cancer
than death itself
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
missingcaregivers: 5.3%;
Singer et al.
fcomparison: 68.8%;
mcomparison: 31.3%;
missingcomparison: 0%
Explore caregiving as n = 15
Broom et al. a social practice that M = not provided, Age Qual interview
Qual Oncology Cancer None Not defined
(2019) 108 occurs across dying and range = 40–80 guide
bereavement w: 10; m: 5
AGS- with
Explore risk factors for
“dementia” The process associated
Burke et al. AG in a sample of family Varied, mostly n = 57
replaced to with grieving the loss of
Quant Palliative Medicine members preparing for cancer (check M = 56.11 (12.97) AG
(2015) 36 “life- loved ones in advance of
the death of their veteran this) f: 42; m: 15
threatening their inevitable death
family member
illness”
AGS- with
Examine the grieving
“dementia”
Burke et al. experience of survivors of n = 35
Palliative care replaced to
Quant Palliative Medicine veterans and to determine M = 58.64 (13.25) AG Not defined
(2019) 109 recipients “life-
risk factors for PLG f: 27; m: 13
threatening
distress
illness”
Explore associations
between residual, current,
Butler et al. n = 50 AG, Partners’ feelings about
and anticipatory stressors Recurrent breast Anticipation of
Quant Oncology M = 56.5 (11.3) Anticipated the possible impact of
(2005) 110 in partners of women cancer Loss Inventory
f: 1; m: 49 loss losing their wife/partner
with metastatic breast
cancer, pre and post-loss
PDG is defined by
the MM-CGI: personal
sacrifice and burden (i.e.,
MM-CGI; losses of time, freedom,
Examine caregiver grief
What would sleep, health), worry and
Carter et al. in Parkinson’s disease n = 74
Parkinson’s you say is the felt isolation (i.e., loss
Mixed Neurology across the three domains M = 69.2 (8.2) PDG, CG
(2012) 97 disease biggest barrier of personal connection to
of the MM-CGI Short f: 28%; m: 72%
you have faced others and worries about
Form
as a caregiver? the future) and heartfelt
sadness and longing (i.e.,
emotional response to loss
of relationship)
Page 34
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
The authors discuss
Singer et al.
Emotive responses as
caregivers mourn for the
psychological and physical
changes in PWD; grief
Evaluate the validity
comprise factors unique
Chan et al. and utility of MM- n = 394
to caring for PWD (i.e.,
Quant Neurology CGI dimensions in Dementia M = 53 (10.7) C-MM-CGI PDG, CG
(2019) 112 communication challenges,
a multiethnic Asian f: 236; m: 158
asynchronous loss, and
population
an ambiguous disease
trajectory leading to worry
and uncertainty about the
future)
ncaregivers = 48,
Compare the emotional ncontrols= 36
adjustment and grief Mcaregivers = 63, SD =
Chentsova- Terminal
intensity of bereaved not provided, Mcontrols =
Dutton et al. chronic illness
Quant Palliative Medicine spouses and adult 56, SD = not provided TRIG None Not defined
and hospice
(2002) 115 children caregivers’ pre- fcaregivers: 83%;
care recipients
loss throughout one-year mcaregivers: 17%;
post-loss fcontrols: 75%: mcontrols:
25%
Page 35
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
Compare AG levels
Singer et al.
Were provided
Examine the symptoms The reaction seen in
symptoms
Clayton et al. of bereavement during people (usually primary
Psychology n = 81 (e.g., depressed
Quant the terminal illness of the Terminal illness AG relative) coping with the
(1973) 46 Palliative Medicine M = 61, SD = not provided mood; crying)
spouses of widows and expected death of someone
but no scale
widowers close
identified
AM is a dynamic
Retrospectively explore n=9
set of processes that
Clukey (2003) AM for family members Cancer, stroke, M = 52.2, SD = not
Qual interview involve emotional and
90 Qual who had not used hospice old age (check provided, Age range = 36– AM
guide cognitive transitions made
or had minimal hospice old age) 68
in response to an expected
services f: 7, m: 2
loss
AM involves a dynamic
Explore the retrospective
Dying patients set of processes that
Clukey (2008) perceptions of the AM n=9
Palliative Medicine; who did not Qual interview include emotional and
116 Qual experience of caregivers M = not provided, Age AG, AM
Nursing receive hospice guide cognitive transitions made
n = 64 Modified
Coelho et al., Cancer,
Identify the mediators of M = 58.2, SD = not Bereavement
Quant Palliative Medicine cardiovascular Grief Not defined
(2016) 74 CG in caregivers provided Risk
disease
f: 82.8%; m: 17.2% Questionnaire
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
while the relative is still
Singer et al.
physically present
AG is a psychological
response initiated by
Describe family caregiver ntotal = 350, a person’s growing
Collins et al. AD, other
experiences of loss and npostbereaved = 87 Open-ended awareness of the
Qual Neurology progressive AG
(1993) 23 grief pre and post-death M = 66 (11) questions impending loss of a loved
dementia
of PWD f: 79%; m: 21% one and the associated
losses in the past, present,
and future
AG is the process
of mourning, coping,
Examine grief reactions MM-CGI-SF-
n = 72 interaction, planning
DeCaporale et in current spousal and Cognitive and Heartfelt
M = 69.8, SD = not and psychological
Quant Palliative Medicine adult-children caregivers physical Sadness and AG
al. (2013) 24 provided reorganization’ that occurs
and in-home respite conditions Longing
f: 20.1%; m: 79.9% as a result of the
utilization over 3 months Subscale
impending loss of a loved
one
An experience of
Dempsey et al. Explore the experience n = 23
Late stage Qual interview Dementia questioning the self and
Qual Neurology of carers who provide M = not provided
(2020) 118 dementia guide grief their own sanity, struggle
EOL care for a person f: 70%; m: 30%
to care and burden of care
Page 37
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
with late-stage dementia
Singer et al.
at home
Identify concerns of
parents of children
with advanced, incurable
Dighe et al. cancers, and to elicit n = 31 Qual interview
Qual Oncology Advance cancer AG Not defined
(2008) 38 their attitudes toward M = not provided guide
revealing the diagnosis
and prognosis to the sick
child
NDRGEI;
Questions were
part of the
Evaluate the Living with Living with Grief that is not associated
Duggleby et Hope Program in rural n = 36 Hope Program with the death of a person
Mixed Oncology women caregivers of Cancer M = 59 (11.6) in the form of a Grief, Loss (e.g., existential concerns,
al. (2013) 120 persons with advanced f: 36; m: 0 hope directed depression, tension and
cancer journaling guilt, physical distress)
activity entitled
“Stories of the
Present”
Provides an overview
of various definitions in
Illustrate the impact
Elliott & Dale literature: the emotional
of AG on people n=3 Questions
Qual Oncology Cancer AG experience a person might
(2007) 121 with learning disabilities M = not provided unspecified
have prior to losing
through three case studies
someone of significance to
him or her
AG is a profound
Explore the experience of
Evans (2009) emotional response to
AG and cancer among n = 22 Qual interview
122 Qual Oncology Cancer AG impending, irreversible
individuals living with M = not provided guide
loss, which may be
cancer, their primary
experienced by both dying
Page 38
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
caregivers, and their people and their loved
Singer et al.
families ones
Measure involvement in
medical decision making AG is the process of
Fowler et al. and if AG is associated n = 73 experiencing the phases
Quant Neurology with problem-solving in Dementia M = 64.9 (11.28) AGS AG of normal bereavement in
(2013) 25 family caregivers of older f: 78.1%; m: 21.9% advance of the loss of a
adults with cognitive loved one
impairment
AG comprises past,
present, and future losses;
AM is “leaving without
saying goodbye,” where
the person is still
Frank (2008) Explore links between n = 415 psychologically present
125 Mixed Neurology AG for family caregivers Dementia M = 60.5, SD = not MM-CGI AG, AM although physically absent.
of PWD provided In the second form,
the person remains
physically present but
psychologically absent
(i.e., “the goodbye without
leaving”)
Examine differences
of AG between AG refers to the process
Garand et al. family caregivers of n = 73 of experiencing the phases
Quant Neurology persons with a new MCI, AD M = 64.88 (11.27) AGS AG of normal bereavement in
(2012) 126 diagnosis of mild f: 57; m: 16 advance of the loss of a
cognitive impairment and significant person
associations with AG
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
giving advance warning
Singer et al.
n = 50
Glick et al. AG is the experience of
Evaluate AG in the ICU M = 55.5
Quant Nursing; Psychology Unspecified AGS AG grief before the death of a
(2018) 48 setting SD = not provided
mourned individual
f: 72%; m: 28%
Investigate the
relationship between
Grief prior to death of the
frontal systems
care recipient; caregiver
behavioral functioning
Guerrero Frontotemporal n = 76 grief is comprised of
and the experience
Quant Neurology lobar M = not provided MMCGI-SF CG sadness and longing, worry
(2012) 88 of grief and burden
degeneration w: 91.2%; m: 8.8% and felt isolation, and
on spousal caregivers
personal sacrifice and
Retrospectively explore
Gunnarsson & meaning(s) of spouses’
n = 12
Ohlen (2006) grief before their Advanced Qual interview
Qual Oncology M = not provided AG Grief before the loss
128 partners’ death after cancer guide
w: 75%; m: 25%
being admitted to a
palliative home care team
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
Test the efficacy of the n = 229
Singer et al.
Examine parents’
perspectives of having
Higgs et al. n=13 Grief experienced in
Nursing; Palliative a child with Spinal Spinal muscular Questions
Qual M = not provided AG anticipation of a loss that
(2016) 33 Medicine Muscular Atrophy type atrophy unspecified
f: 7; m: 6 has yet to occur
1, from diagnosis to
bereavement
Evaluate the
Hinton (1994) circumstances of location n = 77 No grief
75 Mixed Oncology of death and quality of Terminal cancer M = 60 (14) measure Grief Not defined
life in both relatives and w: 34; m: 43 reported
patients
AG of the family
caregivers may be a highly
Follow spouses stressful experience; their
Hisamatsu et of patients with n = 13 experiences during the
Qual interview
Qual Oncology palliative chemotherapy Cancer M = not reported AG patient’s battle with cancer
al. (2020) 131 guide
discontinuation until w: 1; m: 1 affect them even after
bereavement in Japan bereavement and have
the potential to facilitate
appropriate grief work
AG is a multifaceted
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
of family caregivers in person’s death, before said
Singer et al.
Investigate longitudinal
Holm et al. variations in grief, Palliative care n = 117
Referred to as the
Quant Palliative Medicine symptoms of anxiety and recipients, M = 62(13.1) AGS PDG
(2019) 133 experience before death
depression, and self-rated mostly cancer w: 75; m: 42
health
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
AG is prolonged and
Singer et al.
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
Examine the moderating
Singer et al.
AG is a reaction that
occurs in the caregiver
Investigate the course of before an impending
psychological symptoms, loss; a psychological
emotional and social mechanism characterised
Lai et al. n = 60
abilities in caregivers by emotional stress,
Quant Oncology Cancer M = 75 (11) PG-12 AG
(2017) 137 of terminally ill cancer intense pre-occupation
f: 43; m: 17
patients from 1 months with the dying, longing for
before loss to 14 months his/her former personality,
after loneliness, fearfulness,
irritability, anger and
social withdrawal
Grief in dementia
caregivers defined as “true
Evaluate the Mandarin grief,” which can reflect
version of the MM-CGI- the qualities and intensities
Li et al. (2019) n = 91
SF; grief of family Grief in of caregivers’ grief after
94 Quant Neurology Dementia M = 52.19 (14.35) MM-CGI-SF
caregivers of patients caregivers the dementia patient dies;
f: 65.9%; m: 34.1%
with dementia; and includes various physical
predictors of grief and emotional reactions
due to various losses of the
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
of future losses related
Singer et al.
Emotional, cognitive,
and behavioral responses
to the multiple
losses in caregiving;
include ambiguous loss
due to increasing
Liew et al. Determine differences in n = 394
disconnectedness from
Quant Neurology the risk factors of PDG Dementia M = 53 (10.7) MM-CGI PDG
(2018) 67 the PWD who is
and caregiver burden f: 256; m: 138
physically present but
psychologically absent;
and the anticipation of
future losses relating to
the physical death of the
person
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
they are still alive; and
Singer et al.
Complicated grief as
n = 166
divided into AG reactions
Marwit & Develop an instrument Madultchild = 51.81
and bereavement; pre-
Meuser (2002) for the assessment of (8.05), Mspouse = 71.47
Mixed Neurology Dementia MM-CGI CG and post-death grief, are
87 grief in caregivers of (8.93) fadultchild: 73;
unique phenomena from
persons with AD madultchild: 10; fspouse:
each other and other
62; mspouse: 21
psychiatric diagnoses
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
with caregiver health,
Singer et al.
PDG experienced by AD
caregivers is similar to
AG, grief in anticipation
of death to come;
developed from deep
Understand African- feelings of loss and
McLennon et American caregivers n = 19 sadness experienced by
Qual Neurology PDG experiences; to Dementia M = 60 (13.5) MM-CGI-SF PDG caregivers as they watch
al. (2014) 140 assess the validity of f: 16, m: 3 the gradual deterioration
items on the MM-CGI-SF of the personality and
memory of their loved one
into “dependent shadows
of their former selves”,
also referred to as
“psychosocial death”
Examine the
phenomenological
McRae (2005) n = 11 The experience of current
experience of daughters- Qual interview
141 Qual Neurology Dementia M = 50, SD = not provided AG losses or the anticipation
in-law caring for guide
f: 11; m: 0 of loss and grief
a parent-in-law with
dementia
Symptoms include
Identify areas of overlap
Mulligan n = 202 yearning for the family
and disjunction between MM-CGI-SF;
Quant Neurology Dementia M = 67.67 (11.52) PDG member to be healthy
(2011) 60 the PG-12 and the MM- PG-12
f: 148; m: 54 again and feeling shocked
CGI-SF
about the person’s illness
Page 47
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
A syndrome characterized
Singer et al.
by emotional, behavioral
and cognitive symptoms
Examine the relationship (e.g. yearning, searching,
Nanni et al. between pre and post-loss n = 60 Pre-loss detachment, numbness,
Quant Oncology criteria for CG and the Cancer M = 60.3 (12.08) ICG-PL caregiver bitterness, emptiness, and
(2014) 144 validity of ICG for Italian f: 75%; m: 25% grief lost sense of trust
caregivers and control) named as:
complicated grief, then
traumatic grief, and, more
recently, prolonged grief
Compare AG of mothers
of children diagnosed n = 70
Neyshabouri An active process of being
with cancer within the M1month = 32.27, M6–
Quant Oncology Cancer MM-CGI AG sad that occur prior to
et al. (2018) 56 previous month to those 12month = 33.12
actual loss
diagnosed 6–12 months f: 100%; m: 0%
earlier
Investigate whether
severe preloss grief and
depressive symptoms,
n = 3635, 38% bereaved
caregiver burden,
Nielsen et al. w/in 6mo, of these 88%
preparedness for
Quant Oncology Cancer completed T2 PG-12 PLG Not defined
(2017) 83 death, communication
M = 62
about dying, and
f: 70%; m: 30%
socioeconomic factors
predict CG and postloss
depressive symptoms
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
Grief as the reaction to
Singer et al.
An emotional reaction to
actual or perceived losses
among caregivers marked
by increased sadness
Examine the relationships and longing, worry and
among burnout, isolation, and personal
Park et al. n = 606
depressive symptoms, burden; in caregivers, grief
Quant Neurology Dementia M = 60.5 (10.6) MM-CGI AG, CG
(2018) 146 social support, and starts with early signs of
f: 88.9%; m: 10.6%
psychological wellbeing dementia in the family
in caregivers of PWD member and continues
through the stages of
dementia; AG is defined as
anticipation of the loss of a
family member
GEI-Loss
Ponder & Provide evidence of the n = 100 Despair Scale;
intensity, nature and M = 56.6, SD = not Stage of Grief
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
AG is a process that
Singer et al.
Grief experienced by
caregivers prior to the
Examine how coping
Rankin (2011) n = 103 death of the patient in
styles influence seeking
59 Quant Oncology Cancer M = 49.57 (12.43) WOC PDG response to the many
social support for carers
f: 68; m: 35 losses that accompany the
of persons with cancer
cancer diagnosis of a loved
ones
A multifaceted process
occurring over time,
involving physical,
cognitive, emotional,
Examine the effects of
n = 53 behavioral, and social
Rider (1994) ambiguity of loss and AGS-CIV;
PsychologyPalliative M = 46.4, SD = not reactions or tasks in
52 Quant type of relationship on Terminal illness RAGC; TRIG- AG
Medicine provided response to the death of
AG in family caregivers CIV1
f: 86.8%; m: 13.2% a loved one; efforts at
of chronically ill patients
coping with and resolving
the loss are part of this
grief process; also called
post-death grief
AM is the process
of emotional preparatory
Describe the role of AM experience leading up to
Rini & Loriz Mixed cause of n = 11
Nursing; Palliative in parents who recently Qual interview the time of death, formerly
Qual death (check M = not provided AM
(2007) 89 Medicine experienced the death of guide termed AG; AM describes
this) f: 9; m: 2
a hospitalized child not only the process of
grief but other processes
as well; AM encompasses
Page 50
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
seven operations according
Singer et al.
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
n = 14
Singer et al.
The Marriage
Examine the relationship nexperimental = 114, Problems In AG, spouses can move
Various cancers,
Swensen et al. between married couples ncontrol = 100 Scale; The closer behaviorally or
others
Mixed Oncology when one of the spouses Mexperimental = 58.6, SD Scale of AG socially, while starting
(1992) 28 unspecified,
is dying of terminal = not provided, Mcontrol = Feelings and to move away intra-
healthy controls
illness 58.4, SD = not provided Behavior of psychically
Love
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
cognitive and behavioral),
Singer et al.
AG as cyclical periods
of mental anguish and
feelings of loss that begin
12-item
at the time of initial
Welch (1982) Investigate AG in family n = 41 Faschingbauer AG,
diagnosis of a malignancy,
153 Quant Oncology members of adult cancer Cancer M = 44, SD = not provided ’s Texas Unresolved
in expectation of the
patients f: 25; m: 16 Inventory of grief
deprivation of a significant
Grief.
relationship and social role
through the expected death
of a loved one.
Page 53
Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript
AG/Pre-loss
measure or
Author et al. Definition of pre-grief
Methods Field Purpose of Study Illness Context Sample characteristics Qualitative Term used
(Year) term
interview
questions
nfcg = 19,
Singer et al.
Understand the
nhealthcareprofessionals =
Wong & Chan experiences of Chinese
14 Qual interview
Qual Oncology family members of Cancer Grief Not defined
(2007) 154 M = not provided, Age guide
terminally ill patients
range = 18–60
during the EOL
f: 80%; m: 20%
A model that is
comparable to grief, but it
Assess AG and anticipates the forthcoming
n = 66 CSI; MMCGI;
York (2017) 58 Quant Neurology relationship status along AD AG loss of a family member
M = not provided MSPSS
with other outcomes to previously experienced
losses from an incurable
disease
Note. Qual= Qualitaitive. Quant= Quantiative. AD=Alzheimer’s Disease. MM-CGI: Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory. AG=Anticipatory Grief. MM-CGI CC= Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief
Inventory Childhood Cancer. AM=Anticipatory Mourning. MM-CGI-SF= Marwit-Meuser Caregiver Grief Inventory Short Version. ICU=Intensive Care Unit. M=Mean. SD=Standard Deviation. TRIG=The
Texas Inventory of Grief. PDG=Pre-Death Grief. HGRC=Hogan Grief Scale. PG-12=Prolonged Grief. AGS=Anticipatory Grief Scale. PLG=Pre-loss grief. C-MMCGI-SF=Chinese Marwit-Meuser
Caregiver Grief Inventory Short Version. PWD= psychological well-being. NDGEI=Non-death Version of the Grief Experience Inventory. CGQ=Caregiver Grief Questionnaire. EOL=End of Life.
FC=Family caregivers. AGS=Anticipatory Grief Scale. BEQ=Bereavement Experience Questionnaire. MCI=Mild Cognitive Impairment. MFG=Many Faces of Grief Questionnaire. ICG=Inventory of