03 Aspect Identification & Assessment
03 Aspect Identification & Assessment
03 Aspect Identification & Assessment
APPROVAL
The signatures below certify that this procedure has been reviewed and accepted and demonstrates that the
signatories are aware of all the requirements contained herein and are committed to ensuring their provision.
Prepared by
Reviewed by
Approved by
AMENDMENT RECORD
This procedure is reviewed to ensure its continuing relevance to the systems and process that it describes. A
record of contextual additions or omissions is given below:
The electronic version of this procedure is the latest revision. It is the responsibility of the individual to ensure
that any paper material is the current revision. The printed version of this manual is uncontrolled, except
when provided with a document reference number and revision in the field below:
Table of Content
s
1 ASPECT IDENTIFICATION & ASSESSMENT................................................................................................3
1.1.2 References
Standard Title ISO Clauses Manual Sections
BS EN ISO 9001:2015 Quality management systems N/a N/a
BS EN ISO 14001:2015 Environmental management systems 6.1.2 6.1.2
BS EN ISO 45001:2018 OH&S management systems N/a N/a
The QEHS Manager and Process Owners actively identify aspects and mitigate impacts associated with their
activities with the goal of achieving sustained benefit within that activity. All managers and Process Owners
are responsible for:
Using the Aspect Identification Register the QEHS Manager and relevant Process Owners identify all raw
materials, chemicals and utilities that are used as process inputs and all outputs such as products, services
and by-products. Outputs are considered as products, the waste produced, levels of recycled materials,
quantities of water discharge and air emissions for each process or activity.
Following the identification of environmental aspects, their impacts on the environment are calculated and a
significance rating is assigned. All of the organization’s activities are considered when identifying actual and
potential environmental aspects and impacts whilst taking account of:
The assessment of the severity of an environmental impact drives management attention and supports
planning for mitigation. A qualitative risk assessment scheme consisting of qualitative probability and impact
scales is undertaken to ensure detailed understanding of the effects of each impact. The QEHS Manager will
engage with Process Owners to:
1. Identify the control measures already applied to each significant impact i.e. existing control
measures. These may be pro-active (reducing the probability) or reactive (reducing the impact);
2. Rank the probability of each impact occurring, after taking into account the actual effectiveness of
the existing control measures;
3. Enter the existing control measures and the associated current impact scores;
4. Undertake a risk assessment to provide more detailed understanding of the impact’s consequences;
5. Set objectives and targets for achieving impact mitigation.
Using the ‘significance determination’ section of the portion of the Aspect Identification Register the QEHS
Manager will evaluate each identified aspect to determine whether it is significant. The environmental
aspects will be considered to be significant if the aspect has an impact on the environment and meets the
impact significance scoring criteria for implementing mitigation, See table S1 below.
Forecast probability, cost and time data is assessed for each impact based on the causes and effects
described, taking into account the existing controls and active responses.
1. All aspects which elicit concerns of stakeholders, interested parties and our organization are
regarded as significant, if necessary controls have not been implemented;
2. All aspects which are subject to environmental legislation are regarded as significant, and therefore
noted as having a high impact/risk, if there is a breach or potential breach of legislation;
3. All aspects where insufficient information is available to make a reasoned judgement are regarded as
significant until further information is available.
1.3.3 Significance Rating
An inherent impact significance rating represents the level of risk in the absence of a controlled environment
and is arrived at after entering the scores into the Aspect Identification Register. For each impact that is
identified, an evaluation is undertaken to assign a specific score in order to determine the correct level of
action.
Impact significance (Table S1) is calculated by adding the impact, legal and quantity criteria, multiplied by the
frequency. The resulting significance score (Table S2) is then used to prioritise the appropriate level of action.
Any significance criteria scoring 4 are automatically highlighted red and should themselves be considered
significant and subject to treatment.
For each impact, the Process Owner must establish an appropriate level of treatment. Control measures in
addition to those already existing may be needed to achieve this level of mitigation. The QEHS Manager will
engage with Process Owners to develop a satisfactory response to each impact in order to:
1.3.5 Review
Regular reviews are essential to ensure that aspects and impacts are being appropriately managed, and that
the relevant data about those aspects and impacts remains accurate and reliable. The QEHS Manager will on
a regular basis:
1. Engage with Process Owners to ensure that the current and forecast impacts severities reflect the
actual effectiveness of the existing controls and the anticipated effectiveness of the response plans,
and that response plans and existing controls are up-to-date)
2. Challenge the continued relevance of aspects and impacts and the adequacy of the control measures
and response actions;
3. Review and formally issue approval of the current Aspect Identification Register enabling it to be used
for reporting;
4. In the event that they will not approve (part of) the completed Aspect Identification Register, e.g. due
to the inadequacy of control measures and response actions, they will agree with the relevant risk
owner those additional response actions necessary, prior to approval.
1.3.6 Reporting
Regular reports are necessary to inform and provide assurance to Top management and other key
stakeholders, that impacts are being appropriately managed. Reporting must be based on current data
captured in the Aspect Identification Register, which must be updated and reviewed in good time for the next
reporting cycle.
On occasion, it may be appropriate to escalate an aspect or impact to ensure it is assessed and/or managed
by the person or party best placed to do so (able and with appropriate authority). For example where a more
substantial or coordinated response is required than the current Process Owner can authorise or implement
will justify higher level assessment and/or management. The QEHS Manager will:
1. Escalate through established lines of management accountability all aspects and impacts that may
require mitigation. This may take place during formal reviews, or through other simple mechanisms
at management meetings;
2. Issue reports in accordance with requirements;
3. Provides key information such as statistical data on numbers of active impacts, unassessed aspects,
overdue actions, and others as appropriate.
1.3.7 Monitoring
Continuous systematic and formal monitoring of implementation of the environmental aspect and impact
process and outputs will take place against appropriate performance indicators to ensure process compliance
and effectiveness. Monitoring may take a variety of forms and range from self-assessment and internal audits
to detailed reviews by independent external experts.
1.4 Training
To ensure that adequate impact management competency levels are achieved and maintained, your
organization’s provides regular training courses in the impact management process and its application in our
organization.
1. Specific aspect management training sessions are held on an annual basis, aimed at providing an
overview of the management framework.
2. The training will be facilitated by the QEHS Manager. Additional ad-hoc training is provided as
required;
3. Instruments providing training on appropriate controls include job descriptions, inductions, policies,
procedures, terms of reference, charters, performance planning and review programs, contracts and
delegations.
1.5 Communication & Participation
Communication and consultation are important elements in each step of your organization’s environmental
aspect and impact management process. Effective communication is essential to ensure that those
responsible for implementing control, and those with a vested interest, understand the basis on which
decisions are made and why particular actions are required. Our communication approach recognises the
need to promote environmental aspect and impact management concepts across all management teams and
staff.
Significant Determine
Determine
consequences of
significance these requirements on
of impacts our environmental
aspects and impacts
Update the
environmental aspects
and impacts register
Not
Significant
Compliant
Determine new
objectives and targets.
Develop operational
control requirements
Implement and
Record within the
monitor impact
Legal & Compliance
mitigation. Report and
Register
review