Sieves Analysis For Coarse Aggregate: College of Engineering and Architecture
Sieves Analysis For Coarse Aggregate: College of Engineering and Architecture
Sieves Analysis For Coarse Aggregate: College of Engineering and Architecture
Submitted by:
Cenido, Rhaeniel John P.
Rillorta, Angela L.
Roa, Maria Angelica R.
Velasquez, Izhy Angela B.
Date:
March 03, 2023
Submitted to:
Engr. Joven Gueverra
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering and Architecture
II. CONTENT
A. Purpose
The test is performed to determine the distribution of the different particle size
specifically aggregates and fineness modulus of coarse aggregates by sieving. The
information gathered can be used for more accurate measurements in regards to
particle size distribution, which will allow us to understand how the particles are
distributed throughout the process of sieve analysis.
B. Equipment
C. Schematic Diagram
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering and Architecture
D. Test Procedure
The sample is dry to a constant weight at a temperature of 110 degrees Celsius. The
dry sample is then weighed, as well as the each of the empty sieve and the pan. Next,
the dry sample is placed on top of a group of nested sieves in order of decreasing size
of opening from the top to bottom and is mechanically shaken for about 10 minutes.
After shaking, the material retained is weighed on each of the sieves. Finally, calculate
for the percentage coarser than and the percentage passing. Draw the particle
distribution curve and calculate the fineness modulus of the average size of the
sample.
III. RESULTS
100
80
60
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SIEVE'S DIAMETER
Coefficient of 1.215018002
Gradiation
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering and Architecture
Uniformity of 2.190014948
Coefficient
Fineness Modulus 5.325653738
Deviation 0.000194382
Sample Calculations:
1. Obtain the mass of soil retained on each sieve by subtracting the weight of the
empty sieve from the mass of the sieve + retained soil, and record this mass as the
weight retained on the data sheet. The sum of these retained masses should be
approximately equals the initial mass of the soil sample. A loss of more than two
percent is unsatisfactory.
2. Calculate the percent retained on each sieve by dividing the weight retained on
each sieve by the original sample mass
Percentage Passing
For Example:
For No. 4 Sieve:
% Passing = 100 – Cumulative % Retained
= 100 – 99.28064547
= 0.719354525 %
For No. 8 Sieve:
% Passing = 100 – Cumulative % Retained
= 100 – 99.76669583
= 0.23330417 %
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering and Architecture
Uniformity of Coefficient
For example:
D60 = 21.01701215
D10 = 9.596743697
Cu = D60 = 21.01701215 = 2.190014948
D10 9.596743697
Coefficient of Gradation
For Example
D60 = 21.01701215
D30 = 15.65448526
D10 = 9.596743697
Cc = (15.65448526)2 = 1.215018002
(21.01701215)( 9.596743697)
RIZAL TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY
College of Engineering and Architecture
Fineness Modulus
For example:
FM = 532.5653738 = 5.325653738
100
For Example:
Initial Dry = 5144.5
Total Mass Retained = 5143.5
IV. CONCLUSION
Based on the information provided, it can be concluded that a particle's size diameter
affects its mean diameter in terms of length, surface area, and volume. A bell-shaped
curve was produced by plotting the data between particle size and the mass percentage
of the material retained in the screen. The lack of a linear relationship between them
suggests that this variable is not directly proportional to one another.; accuracy may not
be sure to be achieved. The inaccuracy may be due to the insufficient cleanliness of the
sieve.