617 08 16 Article
617 08 16 Article
617 08 16 Article
www.jpp.krakow.pl
1Department of Anesthesia, Clinique Saint-Luc, Bouge, Belgium & Cabinet Medical ASTES,
Jambes, Belgium & University of Liege, Liege, Belgium; 2University Department of Anesthesia and ICM,
CHR Citadelle and CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium & CHU Sart-Tilman, Domaine du Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium;
3Department of Physical Medicine and Functional Readaptation, CHRH, Huy, Belgium; 4Cabinet Medical ASTES, Jambes,
Belgium; 5Department of Neurology, CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium & CHU Sart-Tilman - Domaine du Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium;
6Department of Anesthesia and ICM, CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium & CHU Sart-Tilman - Domaine du Sart-Tilman, Liege, Belgium
Postoperative development or worsening of obstructive sleep apnea is a potential complication of anesthesia. The
objective of this study was to study the effects of a premedication with alprazolam on the occurrence of apneas during
the immediate postoperative period. Fifty ASA 1 – 2 patients undergoing a colonoscopy were recruited. Patients with a
history of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were excluded. Recruited patients were randomly assigned to one of two
groups: in Group A, they received 0.5 mg of alprazolam orally one hour before the procedure; and in Group C, they
received placebo. Anesthesia technique was identical in both groups. Patients were monitored during the first two
postoperative hours to establish their AHI (apnea hypopnea index, the number of apneas and hypopneas per hour). Nine
patients were excluded (4 in group A and 5 in group C) due to technical problems or refusal. Interestingly, premedication
by alprazolam did not change intra-operative propofol requirements. During the first two postoperative hours, the AHI
was significantly higher in group A than in group C (Group A: 20.33 ± 10.97 h–1, C: 9.63 ± 4.67 h–1). These apneas did
not induce significant arterial oxygen desaturation, or mandibular instability. Our study demonstrates that a
premedication with 0.5 mg of alprazolam doesn’t modify intra-operative anesthetic requirements during colonoscopy,
but is associated with a higher rate of obstructive apneas during at least three and a half hours after ingestion. No severe
side effects were observed in our non-obese population. Our results must be confirmed on a larger scale.
K e y w o r d s : alprazolam, obstructive, sleep apnea, postoperative complications, hypopnea, anesthesia, perioperative period
MATERIALS AND METHODS In the endoscopy suit, patients were equipped with standard
monitoring, including electrocardiogram, non-invasive blood
This study has obtained the approval of our Institutional pressure, capnography, and a peripheral saturation in oxygen
Ethics Committee (Ethical Committee of Liege University (SpO2) sensor (Datex-Ohmeda, GE Healthcare, Fairfield,
Hospitals, Liege, Belgium, Chairperson: Prof Maurice Lamy, USA). A Bispectral Index® (BIS, Covidien, St. Ingbert,
Ref: 2007-110). EudraCT registered this study with the reference Germany) electrode was also placed on the forehead of all
number: 2007-002429-66. Informed consent was obtained from patients. An 18G IV line was inserted, and a Hartmann’s
all individual participants included in the study. solution (Baxter SA, Lessines, Belgium) was infused (rate: 200
ml h–1). Patients were also equipped with an oxygen face mask
Patients (Mallinckrodt, Covidien, St. Ingbert, Germany), and the oxygen
flow rate was 10 L min–1. This corresponds to the standard in
Fifty patients scheduled for day-care colonoscopy were our Institution.
recruited (Fig. 1). Exclusion criteria were patient’s refusal, During induction of anesthesia, patients received a single
patients with known obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome, intravenous bolus of ketamine (0.5 mg Kg–1). After that, a
and/or an ASA class ≥ 3. Patients in the first group (Group A) continuous infusion of propofol was adjusted to maintain a BIS
received an oral premedication, consisting in 0.5 mg of value between 70 and 80. This range was determined by a pre-
alprazolam one hour before colonoscopy. Patients in the second test on five patients (unpublished data). From a clinical point of
group (group C) received placebo. The placebo was an inactive view, sedation was targeted at a deep level, so that patients were
comparator indistinguishable from the alprazolam tablet. not responsive throughout the procedure. The respiratory rate
was measured using a capnograph, whose sampling line was
Experimental procedures inserted into the oxygen face mask. Throughout the procedure,
spontaneous ventilation was maintained in all patients.
A researcher who did not participate in managing anesthesia After colonoscopy, patients were admitted to the post-
and data recording prepared the randomization schedule using a anesthesia care unit (PACU) for two hours. They were monitored
computer-generated sequence. During the preoperative visit, a using a portable monitoring device (Somnolter®, Nomics SA,
second investigator recorded patient age, weight, height, neck 4031 Angleur, BELGIUM, www.nomics.be). This device is
circumference and airway difficult score (ADS), which is the validated as a portable device for diagnosing OSA (14-16). It
score for difficult intubation and ventilation used in our hospital consists in a SpO2 sensor, and two piezoelectric sensors placed
(13). This second investigator was blinded to between-group on the face of the patient. Those sensors measure mandibular
patient repartition. movement. This mandibular movement (JAWAC: JAW
Excluded (n=0)
Randomized (n=50)
Two hours stay in PACU in order to Two hours stay in PACU in order to
establish their AHI and to collect their establish their AHI and to collect their
SpO2 (n = 21). SpO2 (n = 20).
Four patients did not achieve this Five patients did not achieve this
monitoring for technical reasons (n=2) or monitoring for technical reasons (n=3) or
refusal of the patient to stay for two hours refusal of the patient to stay for two hours
in the PACU (n = 2). in the PACU (n = 2).
ACtivity) correlates with the esophageal pressure during arrival in the PACU and 3) at PACU discharge by the
obstructive sleep apnea (14-16). The Somnolter® provides an anesthesiologist responsible for post-anesthesia care. Both
estimate of mandibular stability, expressed in percent. One practitioners were blind to group repartition. The overall patient
hundred percent corresponds to a fully closed mouth, and 0% to satisfaction regarding the whole procedure was evaluated upon
the largest mouth opening for a given patient. No calibration of patient discharge from the post-anesthesia care unit.
the device is needed. The software can distinguish obstructive
apneas from other mandibular movements such as speaking. In Statistical analysis
the post-anesthesia care unit, no oxygen was administered.
Somnolter®-recorded SpO2 and AHI were analyzed offline, Data were compiled into a computer file and compared
and the analyzing investigator was blind to group assignment. between groups. The normality of data distribution was
Analgesics consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit was evaluated using a Shapiro-Wilk test. Proportions were analyzed
also recorded. Any administration of paracetamol, ketorolac or using Fisher’s exact tests, and normally distributed data were
butylhyoscine bromure was also recorded. compared between groups using two-tailed unpaired t-tests. Data
The Lickert psychometric scale (17, 18) was used to estimate that did not show a normal distribution were assessed using
patient satisfaction and anxiety (Table 1). The anxiety level was Mann-Withney U tests, or Friedman tests as appropriate. A two-
assessed at three different time points: 1) before colonoscopy by tailed P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
the anesthesiologist in charge of providing anesthesia, 2) upon Data were analysed using XLSTAT for Mac® (version 2015.5.01,
Table 1. Psychometric Lickert’s scale used to appreciate anxiety and satisfaction of the patient. See text for explanations.
Table 2. Demographic, operating room and post-anesthesia care unit data. Reported values are means (S.D.), unless otherwise indicated.
Group A Group C Statistics P
(n = 21) (n = 20)
Age 55.1 (13) 49.7 (11.6) t(39) = 1.4 0.17
Male/female
5/16 11/9 0.03
(n)
BMI
24.9 (4) 24 (3.1) t(39) = 0.7 0.47
in Kg m–2
Neck circumference
36.5 (3.2) 36.9(3.9) t(39) = 0.4 0.7
in cm
Airway Difficult Score (ADS) U = 187.5,
6 (8 – 5) 6 (9 – 5) 0.34
[median (IQR)] Z = –0.6
Ketamine
27.9 (5.6) 31.5 (7.3) t(39) = 1.8 0.08
in mg
Ketamine
0.4 (0.1) 0.4 (0.1) t(39) = 2 0.15
in mg kg–1
Propofol consumption
236.4 (65.1) 291.4 (117.8) t(39) = 1.8 0.08
in mg
Propofol consumption
3.5 (1.2) 4.4 (2.4) t(39) = 2 0.16
in mg kg–1
Analgesic consumption
None None N/A N/A
in PACU
Anxiety upon arrival U = 106.5
2 (1 – 3) 3 (2 – 4) 0.01
in the operating room [median (IQR)] Z = –2.7
Anxiety upon arrival in PACU U = 189
2 (1 – 2) 2 (1 – 3) 0.34
[median (IQR)] Z = –0.5
Overall patient’s satisfaction U = 231
2 (2 – 2) 2 (1 – 2) 0.34
[median (IQR)] Z = –0.5
BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range; PACU, post-anesthesia care unit.
620
Addinsoft SARL®, Paris, France) and MedCalc® (version Patients premedicated with alprazolam were significantly
15.11.0 MedCalc Software bvba®, Ostend, Belgium). less anxious upon arrival in the operating room than patients
who received placebo (P = 0.01). On the opposite, anxiety was
similar in the two groups upon arrival in the post-anesthesia care
RESULTS unit (P = 0.34). The overall patient satisfaction concerning the
whole procedure did also not differ between groups (P = 0.34)
Nine patients were excluded from the study (4 in group A (Table 2).
and 5 in group C). Reasons for exclusion were related to
technical problems or refusal of the patient to stay for two hours
in the post-anesthesia care unit. Post hoc power calculation DISCUSSION
revealed a study power of 78% at detecting a clinically relevant
40% between-group difference in the incidence of apnea during The main result of the present study is that administration of
the first two postoperative hours, at a 0.05 a threshold. 0.5 mg of alprazolam one hour before colonoscopy significantly
Patient characteristics: age, body mass index (BMI), neck increases the number of apneas and hypopneas at least during
circumference, intubation and ventilation score were similar in the two hours after the completion of the procedure. However, this
two groups, except for the gender ratio (Table 2). There were increase is not associated with more frequent arterial oxygen
significantly more women in Group A than in Group C. There was desaturation episodes. It is worth to point out that our population
no statistically significant between-group difference regarding was not at risk of such events. None of the patients were obese
administered ketamine or propofol amounts. BIS values were nor had a history of OSA. Administrating the same alprazolam
comparable between the two groups (mean BIS (S.D.) was 74.52 premedication in patients with an increased risk of obstructive
(1.75) in Group A, and 74.95 (1.67) in Group C, Mann-Whitney apnea could lead to different results (19). Propofol and ketamine
U = 179, P = 0.417). No laryngeal device had to be inserted during were used to provide respectively anesthesia and anti-
colonoscopy. No patient requested the administration of analgesic nociception. This allowed avoiding opioid administration that
medications in the post-anesthesia care unit (Table 2). No could influence the occurrence of postoperative apneic events (6,
additional oxygen was necessary in the PACU. 20-22). Another reason for not observing desaturations can be
During the two hour stay in the post-anesthesia care unit, the related to the increased genioglossus activity associated with the
number of apneas and hypopneas was significantly higher in administration of ketamine (23). However, this property is
Group A than in Group C: median AHI (IQR) was 17.5 (11.45 – observed for much higher doses of ketamine (60 and 125 mg
30.29) in Group A, and 9.25 (7.32 – 10.74) in Group C, Mann- Kg–1) (23). Finally, ketamine could have some actions on delta-
Whitney U = 74, Z = –3.55, P = 0.0007) (Fig. 2). Subdividing and mu-opiod receptors, but without any influence on airway
the two hours spent in the PACU in four 30-minute periods patency (24, 25). Zirlik et al. have demonstrated that melatonin
allowed demonstrating that the difference in the absolute number and omentin seem to be involved in pathogenesis of OSA (26).
of apneas and hypopneas episodes became statistically Of note, the incidence of apneas and hypopneas tended to
significant between groups after 30 minutes (Table 3, Figs. 3 and increase with time in the PACU. However, this increase did not
4). Within-group comparisons did not reveal any significant reach the significance level. Hence, the risk of apnea and
change in the AHI across the 30-minute time points. hypopnea in alprazolam-premedicated patients more than
Peripheral oxygen saturation was similar in both groups at probably persists after PACU discharge, when patients are no
all times (Table 4). Similarly, in the post-anesthesia care unit, longer monitored.
there was no difference in mandibular stability between the two Other studies have investigated the perioperative effects of an
groups (Table 4). alprazolam premedication. Contrarily to our study, they were not
Table 3. Incidence of apnea and hypopnea in the post-anesthesia care unit. Data are means (S.D.).
Group A Group C
Statistics
(n = 21) (n = 20)
Total number of apneas and U = 75
35 18.5
hypopneas observed during 2 hours Z = –3.5
(21 – 53) (14.5 – 21.25)
[median (IQR)] P = 0.0008
U = 74
AHI over the 2 hours 17.5 9.25
Z = –3.5
[median (IQR)] (11.45 – 30.29) (7.32 – 10.74)
P = 0.0007
Number of apneas and hypopneas Friedmans test:
12 8
during first 30 minutes F = 3.20;
(5.5 – 18) (5 – 17)
[median (IQR)] P = 0.09
Number of apneas and hypopneas Friedmans test:
14 6
observed minutes 30 – 60 F = 8.88;
(6 – 29.5) (4 – 11)
[median (IQR)] P = 0.008
Number of apneas and hypopneas Friedmans test:
14 7
observed during minutes 60 – 90 F = 7.31;
(9.5 – 29) (2 – 12)
[median (IQR)] P = 0.014
Number of apneas and hypopneas Friedmans test:
22 11
observed during minutes 90 – 120 F = 5.21;
(10 – 30.5) (4 – 16)
[median (IQR)] P = 0.035
AHI, apnea/hypopnea index; IQR, interquartile range.
necessarily designed to address the problem of postoperative colonoscopy. This is in line with the results of previous studies
apnea incidence and were not necessarily rid of the influence of (29-31). On the opposite, alprazolam administration did not alter
opioids or muscle relaxants (10, 12, 21, 27-30). None of these the anxiety level in the PACU, nor the overall patient
studies have studied the influence of alprazolam on the occurrence satisfaction. This is in accordance with the recent study of
of postoperative apneas. This point was the objective of our study. Maurice-Szamburski et al. (28, 32). Interestingly, the
Gentil et al. studied the effects of a premedication by premedication by alprazolam did not modify propofol
midazolam in an OSA patient population (70). They requirements to achieve the BIS target during colonoscopy.
demonstrated that midazolam did not increase the number of Our study shows that alprazolam administration increases the
apneas in the OSA group. Similarly to our results, they did not risk of obstructive apneas. Although our patient population was
evidence any significant difference in the incidence of peripheral not obese or suffering from OSA, this should prompt cautiousness
oxygen desaturation. Of note, however, this study was when administering an alprazolam premedication to them. Those
performed in only seven OSA patients. patients are particularly sensitive to drug-induced apneas, all the
Aside apnea/hypopnea findings, our study demonstrates that more if they do not have or use a CPAP (4, 19, 33, 34). According
alprazolam is effective at reducing patient anxiety before to Pawlik et al., clonidine could be an alternative in such a high-
622
Table 4. Peripheral saturation in oxygen (SpO2, %) and mandibular stability (%) during the perioperative period.
Group A Group C
Statistics
(n = 21) (n = 20)
U = 204
SpO2 before induction of anesthesia 96 96
Z = 0.16
[median (IQR)] (94.7 – 98) (95 – 97)
P = 0.87
U = 183
Maximal SpO2 in PACU 98 99
Z = 0.07
[median (IQR)] (97.8 – 99.3) (98 – 99.5)
P = 0.95
U = 207.5
Minimal SpO2 in PACU 91 91.5
Z = 0.07
[median (IQR)] (90 – 93) (90 – 95)
P = 0.95
U = 175.5
Mean SpO2 in PACU 95.17 94.28
Z = 0.97
[median (IQR)] (95.17 – 95.17) (92.46 – 95.98)
P = 0.33
U = 197
Number of events when SpO2 drop 4 5
Z = 0.34
below 94% in PACU [median (IQR)] (1 – 19.75) (0 – 18.5)
P = 0.73
Maximal MO in PACU t(39) = 0.47
95.88 (48) 90.78 (12.4)
[mean (S.D.)] P = 0.99
Minimal MO in PACU t(39) = 0.44
57.1 (28.3) 61.32 (32.8)
[mean (S.D.)] P = 0.78
Mean MO in PACU t(39) = 1.05
72.19 (22.4) 78.65 (16.7)
[mean (S.D.)] P = 0.89
IQR, interquartile range; PACU, post-anesthesia care unit; NS, not significant; MO, mouth opening
risk population (35). Hence, the choice of such premedication ACCP (American College of Chest Physicians), Madrid, March
should be weighed carefully, and should ideally be assessed in a 2014 and The Annual Congress of the American Society of
specifically dedicated study enrolling such patients (36, 37). Anesthesiologist, New Orleans, October 2014.
Readers should keep in mind that OSA is also correlated
with oxidative stress and thrombotic events that represent also a Acknowledgements: The authors want to acknowledge
risk of postoperative complications (38, 39). Recently, Sharman Sandrine REMY, Murielle KIRSCH, Gaetane HICK, Pol HANS,
et al. have demonstrated that repeated obstructions of the airway and Laurent CAMBRON as participating investigators.
do not lead to cardiovascular dysfunction in healthy individuals
(40). Hypoxemia could play a role in the development of Conflict of interests: None declared.
postoperative complications (41, 42).
This study has limitations. First, one may argue that a
polysomnography is not performed in each patient before REFERENCES
colonoscopy to exclude OSA. However, the risk of OSA can also
be assessed using a clinical score, such as the DES-OSA score 1. Rechtshaffen A, Kales A. A Manual of Standardized
(43). None of the fifty patients included has a score higher than Terminology and Scoring System for Sleep Stages of Human
5. This result indicates a very low probability of OSA. Second, Subjects. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington,
our study was performed on a small number of patients. Our DC, NIH Publication No. 204, 1968.
study is slightly underpowered. Thus our study can indicate an 2. Mutter TC, Chateau D, Moffatt M, Ramsey C, Roos LL,
estimation, but a larger scale study is required for definitive Kryger M. A matched cohort study of postoperative outcomes
conclusions (44). Third, the level of anxiety was assessed using in obstructive sleep apnea: could preoperative diagnosis and
a 4-point Lickert scale, as it was the standard practice in our treatment prevent complications? Anesthesiology 2014; 121:
institution at the time of completion of the study. However, this 707-718.
option is debatable and other scales, such as a verbal patient self- 3. Bettelli G. High risk patients in day surgery. Minerva
rating numeric scale, could have been more sensitive. Anestesiol 2009; 75: 259-268.
In conclusion, our study demonstrates that alprazolam 4. Corso RM, Petrini F, Buccioli M, et al. Clinical utility of
significantly increases the risk of postoperative apnea for at least preoperative screening with STOP-Bang questionnaire in
three and a half hours after administration. In a non-obese OSA- elective surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 877-884.
free patient population, the increase in the number of apneas does 5. Hillman DR, Platt PR, Eastwood PR. Anesthesia, sleep,
not result in an increased incidence of peripheral oxygen and upper airway collapsibility. Anesthesiol Clin 2010; 28:
desaturation. Although reducing preoperative anxiety, it does not 443-455.
alter postoperative anxiety. It does not modify the anesthetic 6. Eikermann M, Blobner M, Groeben H, et al. Postoperative
requirement during colonoscopy. The preoperative administration upper airway obstruction after recovery of the train of four
of alprazolam is questionable and must be confirmed on a larger ratio of the adductor pollicis muscle from neuromuscular
scale. blockade. Anesth Analg 2006; 102: 937-942.
Preliminary data for this study were presented as a poster 7. Gentil B, Tehindrazanarivelo A, Lienhart A, Meyer B, Fleury
and/or oral presentation at: The First World Congress of Chest- B. Respiratory effects of midazolam in patients with
623
obstructive sleep apnea syndromes [in French]. Ann Fr Anesth 27. Franssen C, Hans P, Brichant JF, Noirot D, Lamy M.
Reanim 1994; 13: 275-279. Comparison between alprazolam and hydroxyzine for oral
8. White PF. Pharmacologic and clinical aspects of premedication. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 13-17.
preoperative medication. Anesth Analg 1986; 65: 963-974. 28. Beydon L, Rouxel A, Camut N, et al. Sedative
9. Kanto J. Benzodiazepines as oral premedicants. Br J premedication before surgery - a multicentre randomized
Anaesth 1981; 53: 1179-1188. study versus placebo. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2015; 34:
10. De Witte JL, Alegret C, Sessler DI, Cammu G. Preoperative 165-171.
alprazolam reduces anxiety in ambulatory surgery patients: a 29. Joseph TT, Krishna HM, Kamath S. Premedication with
comparison with oral midazolam. Anesth Analg 2002; 95: gabapentin, alprazolam or a placebo for abdominal
1601-1606. hysterectomy: effect on pre-operative anxiety, post-operative
11. Dahmani S, Brasher C, Stany I, Golmard J, Skhiri A, pain and morphine consumption. Indian J Anaesth 2014; 58:
Bruneau B, et al. Premedication with clonidine is superior to 693-699.
benzodiazepines. A meta analysis of published studies. Acta 30. Shavakhi A, Soleiman S, Gholamrezaei A, et al.
Anaesthesiol Scand 2010; 54: 397-402. Premedication with sublingual or oral alprazolam in adults
12. Jayaraman L, Sinha A, Punhani D. A comparative study to undergoing diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
evaluate the effect of intranasal dexmedetomidine versus Endoscopy 2014; 46: 633-639.
oral alprazolam as a premedication agent in morbidly obese 31. Gras S, Servin F, Bedairia E, et al. The effect of preoperative
patients undergoing bariatric surgery. J Anaesthesiol Clin heart rate and anxiety on the propofol dose required for loss
Pharmacol 2013; 29: 179-182. of consciousness. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 89-93.
13. Janssens M, Lamy M. Airway Difficulty Score (ADS): a new 32. Maurice-Szamburski A, Auquier P, Viarre-Oreal V, et al.
score to predict difficulty in airway management. Eur J Effect of sedative premedication on patient experience after
Anaesthesiol 2000; 17 (Suppl. 19): 35. general anesthesia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2015;
14. Senny F, Destine J, Poirrier R. Midsagittal jaw movements 313: 916-925.
as a sleep/wake marker. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009; 56: 33. Horner RL. Neural control of the upper airway: integrative
303-309. physiological mechanisms and relevance for sleep
15. Cheliout-Heraut F, Senny F, Djouadi F, Ouayoun M, Bour disordered breathing. Compr Physiol 2012; 2: 479-535.
F. Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: comparison 34. Deflandre E, Degey S, Bonhomme V, et al. Preoperative
between polysomnography and portable sleep monitoring adherence to continuous positive airway pressure among
based on jaw recordings. Neurophysiol Clin 2011; 41: obstructive sleep apnea patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2015;
191-198. 81: 960-967.
16. Maury G, Cambron L, Jamart J, Marchand E, Senny F, 35. Pawlik MT, Hansen E, Waldhauser D, Selig C, Kuehnel TS.
Poirrier R. Added value of a mandible movement automated Clonidine premedication in patients with sleep apnea
analysis in the screening of obstructive sleep apnea. J Sleep syndrome: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Res 2013; 22: 96-103. study. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 1374-1380.
17. Lickert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. 36. Bolden N, Smith CE, Auckley D. Avoiding adverse
Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1-55. outcomes in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA):
18. Drinkwater B. A comparison of the direction-of-perception development and implementation of a perioperative OSA
technique with the Likert method in the measurement of protocol. J Clin Anesth 2009; 21: 286-293.
attitudes. J Soc Psychol 1965; 67: 189-196. 37. Donohoe CL, Feeney C, Carey MF, Reynolds JV.
19. Silva PL, Rocco PR. Predicting the risk of postoperative Perioperative evaluation of the obese patient. J Clin Anesth
complications in obese patients: how close are we? Minerva 2011; 23: 575-586.
Anestesiol 2013; 79: 335-338. 38. Hopps E, Lo Presti R, Montana M, Canino B, Calandrino V,
20. Pattinson KT. Opioids and the control of respiration. Br J Caimi G. Analysis of the correlations between oxidative
Anaesth 2008; 100: 747-758. stress, gelatinases and their tissue inhibitors in the human
21. Dahan A, Aarts L, Smith TW. Incidence, reversal, and subjects with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. J Physiol
prevention of opioid-induced respiratory depression. Pharmacol 2015; 66: 803-810.
Anesthesiology 2010; 112: 226-238. 39. Deflandre E, Degey S, Opsomer N, Brichant JF, Joris J.
22. Chelazzi C, Consales G, Boninsegni P, Bonanomi GA, Obstructive sleep apnea and smoking as a risk factor for
Castiglione G, De Gaudio AR. Propofol sedation in a venous thromboembolism events: review of the literature on
colorectal cancer screening outpatient cohort. Minerva the common pathophysiological mechanisms. Obes Surg
Anestesiol 2009; 75: 677-683. 2016; 26: 640-648.
23. Eikermann M, Grosse-Sundrup M, Zaremba S, et al. 40. Sharman JE, Johns DP, Marrone J, Walls J, Wood-Baker R,
Ketamine activates breathing and abolishes the coupling Walters EH. Cardiovascular effects of methacholine-induced
between loss of consciousness and upper airway dilator airway obstruction in man. J Physiol Pharmacol 2014; 65:
muscle dysfunction. Anesthesiology 2012; 116: 35-46. 401-407.
24. Sarton E, Teppema LJ, Olievier C, et al. The involvement of 41. Deflandre EP, Bonhomme VL, Brichant JE, Joris JL. What
the mu-opioid receptor in ketamine-induced respiratory mediates postoperative risk in obstructive sleep apnea:
depression and antinociception. Anesth Analg 2001; 93: airway obstruction, nocturnal hypoxia, or both? Can J
1495-500. Anaesth 2016; 63: 1104-1105.
25. Shikanai H, Hiraide S, Kamiyama H, et al. Subanalgesic 42. Chung F, Zhou L, Liao P. Parameters from preoperative
ketamine enhances morphine-induced antinociceptive overnight oximetry predict postoperative adverse events.
activity without cortical dysfunction in rats. J Anesth 2014; Minerva Anestesiol 2014; 80: 1084-1095.
28: 390-398. 43. Deflandre E, Degey S, Brichant JF, Poirrier R, Bonhomme
26. Zirlik S, Hildner KM, Targosz A, et al. Melatonin and V. Development and validation of a morphologic obstructive
omentin: influence factors in the obstructive sleep apnoea sleep apnea prediction score: the DES-OSA score. Anesth
syndrome? J Physiol Pharmacol 2013; 64: 353-360. Analg 2016; 122: 363-372.
624
44. Vetter TR, Redden DT. The power and perils of big data: it
all depends on how you slice, dice, and digest it. Anesth
Analg 2015; 121: 582-585.