Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Solar PV
Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Solar PV
Exploring Opportunities and Challenges of Solar PV
1 School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China;
wht23@126.com (H.W.); Xinxin.Xu@ncepu.edu.cn (X.X.)
2 School of Economics and Management, Northeast Electric Power University, Jilin 132012, China
3 China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group (CECEP), Beijing 100082, China
Abstract: China has experienced rapid social and economic development in the past 40 years. How-
ever, excessive consumption of fossil fuel energy has caused an energy shortage and led to severe
environmental pollution. To achieve sustainable development, China is striving to transform its
growth mode. Adopting renewable energy (RE) including solar photovoltaic (PV) power is an ef-
fective measure. How to promote the further development of solar PV power under the scenario of
China’s aspirational target of carbon peak by 2030 and 20% RE ratio in the energy mix remains a
theme that need to be addressed. This paper analyzes the potential opportunities and challenges
confronting solar PV power in China. The analysis covers the dimensions of political, economic,
social, and technological (PEST). The results revealed a significant prospect for the further deploy-
ment of solar PV power in the coming decades. The aggressive estimated installed capacity of solar
PV power is expected to reach 80+ GW annually. To successfully achieve the goal of 80+ GW, barriers
that hinder the further development of solar PV power have to be eliminated. Suggestions for poli-
Citation: Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Xu, X.; cymakers include maintaining enforceability and continuity of policies, favorable financial sup-
Fei, L. Exploring Opportunities and ports, mandatory RE quotas for all parties, and supporting fundamental R&D. Suggestions for the
Challenges of Solar PV Power under solar PV industry include full utilization of integrated applications, set up an after-sales service
Carbon Peak Scenario in China: A
network, collaborative innovation among the industry chain, and engaging in storage and hydrogen
PEST Analysis. Energies 2021, 14,
technology. The findings are greatly beneficial for policymakers and the solar PV industry.
3061. https://doi.org/10.3390/
en14113061
Keywords: carbon peak; renewable energy; solar PV power; China; PEST analysis; incentive policy
made specific energy development strategies for the following five years. Tactics include:
improving energy efficiency, introducing new technologies, increasing R&D investment,
and exploiting RE. As one of the most burgeoning RE resources, solar PV power enjoys
intrinsic characteristics such as inexhaustibility, safety, and environmental-friendliness
[8], which has the potential to fulfill the total energy demand globally [9]. Although the
cost has been historically relatively high, driven by technology advancement and reduced
costs, it has become an affordable RE resource [10]. Many countries that are dedicated to
meeting increasing energy demand or devoting themselves to sustainable development
have noticed this encouraging trend and have set short-term and long-term goals for the
development of solar PV power.
Solar PV power has experienced remarkable development in the past decade and has
become the third-largest source of RE. Alongside wind power (733.28 GW), solar PV
power (713.97 GW) has become a vital RE resource, second to hydropower (1739.88 GW),
and has made significant contributions in meeting the increasing energy demand and in
sustainable development globally [11]. Although the challenges and uncertainties that re-
sulted in an economic slowdown due to the adverse effect of the COVID-19 pandemic,
solar PV power has shown its tenacious vitality and gained positive growth. The newly
installed capacity reached 126.84 GW (cumulative 713.97 GW) in 2020, a 29.27% growth
compared with 2019. Among them, China accounted for the largest share of 49 GW (cu-
mulative 254.35 GW), followed by the United States of America (USA), where the newly
installed capacity was 14.89 GW (cumulative 75.57 GW). Vietmam performed beyond es-
timation and achieved an incremental installed volume of 11 GW (cumulative 16.50 GW).
The European Union (EU) still experienced high growth that restarted from 2018, and the
newly installed capacity was 18.78 GW (cumulative 152.92 GW). However, India encoun-
tered a sharp decline, and the newly installed capacity was merely 4.12 GW (cumulative
39.21 GW) compared with an incremental volume of 7.74 GW in 2019 [11] because India
imposed extra customs duties on imported solar PV panels, which eroded the ever-robust
solar PV market [12]. Upon review of the development of solar PV power globally, sys-
tematical incentive policies have been identified as the key factors that have triggered and
accelerated the deployment progress. Each country’s approach is characterized by its cus-
tomized policies [13]. Germany has taken the lead in formulating Political frameworks by
revising the Renewable Energy Law in 2000 (EEG-2000) that guaranteed the rapid devel-
opment of the solar PV power industry [14]. Germany has been a pioneer in the adoption
of solar PV power for nearly ten years. The USA has implemented policies focused on
Economic respects. National and state-level policies including the tax-refund scheme, soft
loans, and other financial supports have made the USA ranked in the top three in the solar
PV field [15]. The Fukushima nuclear accident in 2011 was a landmark Social event, which
reignited Japanese enthusiasm about RE resources. The Japanese prefer solar to wind for
eco-environmental reasons, and solar PV power is much more expensive. High feed-in
tariff (FIT) rates (42 JPY/kWh), lower interest costs, and 100% acquisition of electricity
generated by solar PV power plants by the grid companies have ensured a continuous
motivation to develop solar PV power. Today, electricity generated by solar PV power
plays a significant role in the Japanese energy mix [16]. India has heartened the develop-
ment of solar PV power from Political and Economic views by promulgating the National
Solar Mission strategy and has issued favorable FIT rates, long-term power purchase
agreements (PPAs), and taxation preferences [17,18]. All these measures have activated
India’s solar PV market, and the peak installation volume even reached 10 GW in 2018.
As a latecomer in the field of solar PV power, China has realized the great significance
and potential of solar PV power and has formulated comprehensive support for solar PV
power from the perspectives of Political, Economic, and Technological factors. China en-
acted its Renewable Energy Law in 2006 and has issued favorable FIT rates [19,20]. In
addition, China has granted taxation preferences and fiscal subsidies for R&D for the solar
PV industry supply chain [21,22].
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 3 of 28
China has officially pledged to reach a carbon peak by 2030 and carbon neutrality by
2060 [23]. Measures to achieve carbon peak and sustainable development include enhanc-
ing energy efficiency, introducing new technologies, and the adoption of REs. Given that
coal-fired electricity contributes the greatest portion to carbon emissions, the deployment
of REs as alternative energy sources is a direct and effective way to reduce carbon emis-
sions. Among all REs, solar PV power is one of the most accessible and affordable sources,
and will eventually play a vital role. BP Energy Outlook also projected that to achieve zero
carbon emissions, wind and solar PV power’s total capacity will reach 20,000 GW by 2050.
The average installed capacity of solar PV power could attain 550 GW annually (wind
power,350 GW). Electricity generated by wind and solar PV will account for more than
60% of the total energy supply [24]. In the era of grid-parity, along with China’s 2030 car-
bon peak ambition, it is essential to conduct a holistic analysis of solar PV power from a
macro view. This will help to identify potential opportunities and challenges confronting
solar PV power, hence assisting China in achieving its aspirational carbon peak target, but
also benefitting the development of solar PV power worldwide.
2. Literature Review
With the development of solar PV power in China, various studies have been con-
ducted and they can be classified in terms of Political, Economic, Social, and Technolog-
ical aspects.
Since the Policy is the critical engine to spur the development of solar PV power [13],
most of the literature is related to policies. Zhao Rui Rui et al. [25] discussed the opportu-
nities and potential challenges in developing solar PV power in China. They assessed
China’s “Golden Sun” project, which had received installation subsidies from the Ministry
of Finance. Sufang Zhang and Yongxiu He [19] conducted an excellent comprehensive
review of China’s incentive policies in the pre-FIT period. They analyzed the solar PV
industry status, application types, and other support schemes. The Brightness and Town-
ship Electrification Program, the Rooftop Program, Golden Sun Demonstration Program,
and the Solar PV Concession Program were all discussed. Finally, they found that the na-
tional FIT scheme was the underlying element to activate the solar PV power. They also
recommended that the government adopt differentiated FIT based on regional resource
differences. After China initiated the FIT scheme, the Chinese solar PV market witnessed
explosive expansion, but fiscal burdens increased simultaneously. Researchers have sug-
gested that tariff levels should be adjusted more frequently, and a tight quota combined
with the deployment of ultra-high voltage (UHV) transmission lines should be continued
to the provinces with harsh light abandoned phenomenon [20]. Motivated by the succes-
sive incentive policies, solar PV power has reached grid-party level in China and world-
wide [26]. In the post-grid-parity era, new policy approaches are needed to avoid the “pol-
icy valley of death”, and cross-sectoral policy support and management are required to
handle tremendous coordination to accommodate the interest of a broader range of stake-
holders [27].
Economic benefits are crucial for investors to evaluate the chance to participate in the
solar PV field. FIT schemes are considered as best practice to supplement the solar PV
power’s defects on economic returns [28,29]. Experts have explored the performance and
economic viability of solar PV systems in different areas in a vast country, where the re-
sults demonstrated that climatic differences lead to variations in economic returns [30]. In
compliance with this theory, China has issued a three-tiered FIT scheme. Ouyang and Li
[31] deemed the high cost of RE as the main restriction element that impeded large-scale
deployment in China. They discovered that the FIT with a 5% discount rate could cover
the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of wind and solar PV power, but that it was not
sufficient for biomass. Their suggestions are to solve the financing problem of RE projects
and that FIT should be dynamically adjusted based on the LCOE benchmark. MM Zhang
et al. [32] proposed an accurate optional model for evaluating RE investment by synthe-
sizing uncertain factors. The result revealed that the current environment might not be
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 4 of 28
favorable enough to attract immediate investment unless the government increases the
FIT rates. Scholar Dirk Kayser organized a structured interview with 69 solar PV partici-
pants and identified severe cash-flow uncertainties, unreliable supply chains, and a weak
regulatory environment in China. There are prominent risk factors that inhibit the sus-
tainable development of solar PV power, and solid institutional responses are most urgent
[33]. Though there are risks for large-scale solar PV power projects, residential systems
with both central and local governments’ subsidies, self-consumption, and access to the
grid for surplus electricity enjoy satisfactory economic profitability [34]. The post-FIT pe-
riod where the LCOE can achieve grid parity level demonstrates that subsidies are dis-
pensable and that the market mechanism will play an important role [35].
Whenever the Social sector is concerned, only a small number of studies have been
undertaken. Research sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China
(NSFC) explored why solar PV integrated agricultural greenhouses were always un-
derutilization, even they brought considerable social benefits. Additional social benefits
include creating new jobs, raising taxes, and avoiding CO2 emissions. The crop price was
eventually found to be the sensitive influencing factor. They suggested that solar PV ag-
riculture companies should pay more attention to crop planting to enhance the compre-
hensive benefits of the integrated project [36]. Consumer choice behavior is crucial to sup-
port the development of RE and low-carbon development. Liu Yong et al. [37] have com-
bined system dynamics with an agent-based model (SD-AB) to explore influencing factors
associated with consumer choice behavior. They found that consumers’ willingness to pay
for RE and low-carbon products depended on the delivery speed, consumer patience, and
degree of satisfaction, but not the low-carbon awareness. Liu Yong and Mengya Zhang
[38] launched a questionnaire to investigate the stereotypes and prejudice about solar PV
power among the public in China and found that most of the public have realized the
positive aspects of cleanliness, sustainability, and abundance. Still, a portion of the sam-
pled population held prejudice or misunderstandings on solar PV power being more ex-
pensive than coal or restricted by region, or hard to store.
Technology is an earthshaking factor that drives cost down and improves produc-
tivity. Early research focused on solar PV power technology in China was conducted by
Mr. Yuwen Zhao [39], who examined the R&D activities about solar PV cells, solar sys-
tems, and application types of solar PV kits. He put forward that a quality control system
should be established, and that international cooperation was a shortcut to introduce solar
PV technology to China. Lei Xiaoping et al. [40] examined technological collaboration in
the solar PV industry from three levels (city, national, and international) and pointed out
that international cooperation on patents had strengthened the technological capability of
China’s solar PV industry. Still, China only has a small number of patents and should be
more active in technical innovation. Interaction of the solar PV industry’s endeavors and
government support will surely enhance the technical innovation performance [41]. Solar
PV power has experienced rapid development in China, and challenges for the state grid
have emerged that need to be solved immediately. Scholars have finalized various re-
searches whose findings have helped to improve the solar PV power plants’ yield perfor-
mance and strengthen the coordination between solar PV power and the grids [42,43]. In
the past five years, scholars have tried to combine solar PV power with other energy
sources and have researched solar energy coupling with wind energy and hydropower
[44,45] and proven the feasibility from a technical standpoint. On-grid solar PV power
plants integrated with battery storage systems could alleviate the transmission burdens
of the grids, and off-grid solar PV systems with batteries can guarantee the electricity sup-
ply [46,47]. With the emergence of electric vehicles (EVs), scholars from the Netherlands
have evaluated the feasibility of solar PV power charging stations in China and the USA.
by adopting a simulation model. They found it to be a feasible solution in the commercial
center or office parking lots during working hours. The study was conducted from the
technical, economic, and environmental perspectives [48].
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 5 of 28
The existing studies have made remarkable contributions to the development of solar
PV power in China. However, almost all of them focused on an individual aspect or sev-
eral aspects. Few studies have conducted holistic research covering the four elements of
Political, Economic, Social, and Technological. Furthermore, after years of development,
China’s solar PV industry has been globally ranking first in terms of the industry produc-
tion capacity, annual incremental installation volume, and cumulative installation scale.
Nevertheless, facing the grid-parity era and carbon peak scenario, it is exceptionally ur-
gent to undertake a rigorous macro analysis of solar PV power in China from a holistic
point of view. Inspired by the former academic achievements of [49], we adopted the PEST
analysis as the tool. Hopefully, this study supplements the gaps in existing research and
provides a macro-environmental analysis for the development of solar PV power in
China. A better understanding of the PEST confronting solar PV power can help the gov-
ernment to formulate appropriate policies, and enterprises can formulate proper devel-
opment strategies. Eventually, it will ensure the sustainable development of the solar PV
industry and assist China in achieving its carbon peak by 2030.
3. Research Methodology
3.1. A Brief Introduction to PEST
PEST (political, economic, social, technological) analysis is a theoretical macro exter-
nal environment analysis tool that helps a company or industry to scan the external busi-
ness environment [50]. Its primary connotation is to put the organization under the macro
environment including political, economic, social, technological, and other related factors.
It is also identified as STEP (social, technological, economic, political) or PESTLE (political,
economic, social, technological, legal, environmental). The purpose of PEST analysis is to
conduct a comprehensive understanding of an organization or industry’s external envi-
ronment to formulate the development strategy. The framework and main contents of the
PEST analysis are shown in Figure 1.
Political
Government policy, political
stability or instability,
bureaucracy, corruption,
competition regulation,
foreign trade policy, tax
policy, trade restrictions and
etc.
Economic
Social
Economic trends, growth
rates, industry growth,
international trade &
Company/ Population demographics,
religion, language&education
exchange rates, labor costs, , family size/structure,
taxation, inflation, interest Industry lifestyle trends, etc.
rates, availability of credit,
monetary policies, raw
material costs, etc.
Technological
Technology infrastructure,
research and innovation,
technology incentives,
emerging
technologies,technical
potential,etc.
Figure 1. Framework and main contents of PEST analysis. Source: PEST analysis financial definition of
PEST analysis (thefreedictionary.com (accessed on 16 May 2021)).
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 6 of 28
were carried out through teleconference or online questionnaire surveys. Each consulta-
tion lasted for 50–60 min. The objective of this study and definitions of PEST factors were
well communicated with the respondents for basic knowledge, and free discussion was
encouraged. Based on the information obtained from the government reports, Chinese
Energy White Paper, literature review, official websites, and record of consultations, the
PEST factors affecting the opportunities and challenges for the development of solar PV
power in China were initially identified. In Step 3, the four authors and another five ex-
perts held a meeting to assess the reliability of the factors. The most important factors
were extracted, and neglected aspects such as the impact of COVID-19 were supple-
mented. The final list of PEST factors was obtained after the evaluation process, and the
PEST matrix was established. In step 4, recommendations and suggestions to accelerate
the development of solar PV power in China were put forward at both government and
industry levels.
Table 3. The opportunities matrix of the PEST analysis for further development of solar PV power
in China.
Energy-saving &
environmetl
Protection Industry
SEIs
New Material
Bio-industry
Industry
High-tech Equipment
Renewable & New
Manufactuing
Energy industry
industry
Figure 3. Diagram of China’s Seven Strategic Emerging Industries. Source: Organized by the au-
thor and source from [62].
China has set specific targets to optimize the energy mix. Moreover, China submitted its
NDC (National Determined Contribution) under The Paris Agreement in 2016 [65]. By the
end of 2019, RE accounted for 15.17% of China’s energy mix, a colossal advancement com-
pared with 9.7% in 2012 [59]. Motivated by the aspirational target of carbon peak by 2030,
a shift of the current RE proportion from 15.9% (2020) to 20% (2030) is essential. China is
now restricting the development of coal power, cautiously developing nuclear power, and
encouraging the development of REs including wind power, solar PV power, hydro-
power, and biomass power. The overall target for wind power and solar PV power is to
reach 1200 GW by 2030. Since solar PV power enjoys the instinctive characteristics of in-
exhaustibleness, environmental-friendliness, and its cost has plummeted dramatically to
grid parity level [27], it is acknowledged as the most promising RE resource. The esti-
mated annual incremental installed volume will reach approximately 80+ GW in the com-
ing ten years. Figure 4 illustrates the current energy mix and estimated optimized energy
mix in 2030.
57.70
18.90
2019 8.10
15.17
0.13
50.00
18.00
2030 11.50
20.00
0.50
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60
Figure 4. China’s energy mix by 2019 and estimated energy mix by 2030. Source: National Bureau
of Statistics of China data.stats.gov.cn/english/easyquery.htm?cn=C01 (accessed on 20 April 2021).
Volume(GW)
120
80 83.77
75.07 78.82
66.80
60
53.79
40 41.30
31.53
20 21.30
2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Figure 5. Export volume of solar PV products in 2016–2020. Source: China Photovoltaic Industry
Association (CPIA) [66].
Figure 6. Real GDP growth rate of China compared with the G20. Source: OECD [2,67].
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 12 of 28
C X(1+IRR)
i =0
i
-i
LCOE= n (1)
Ei X(1 + IRR)−i
i =0
where:
Ci stands for the cost in the year i .
Ci = Year i Fixed asset investment + Year i O & M cost—Depreciation (2)
Ei stands for electricity generated in Year i
2.40 2.35
2.00
1.60 1.71
1.44
1.20 1.28 1.23
0.99 0.94 0.95
0.80 0.80 0.88
0.73 0.68 0.65 0.69
0.53 0.50 0.47
0.40 0.42 0.33 0.29 0.24 0.21 0.23
0.00
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Figure 7. Price trend of solar panels and solar systems. Source: [69].
4.3.3. Continuous Improving Higher Education and Talent Training System (SO3)
The solar PV industry is a typical dual-capital and technology-intensive industry.
Recognizing the solar PV industry from the entire supply chain, upstream includes pol-
ysilicon production and wafer slicing. The midstream contains solar cell manufacturing
and solar module insulation, while the downstream focuses on system construction and
operation and maintenance (O&M). The entire solar PV power industry integrates various
disciplines and knowledge such as physics, chemistry, power, intelligent manufacturing,
information technology, and big data. Therefore, the solar PV power industry has fastid-
ious requirements for the technical and management of talent. Simultaneously, with the
advancement of the complete automation production process, ordinary blue-collar em-
ployees in the workshops are required to master specific skills. Since China implemented
its education reform in 1997, the state’s investment in education has continued to grow.
Education investment exceeded 5% of GDP in 2020, and nearly eight million college stu-
dents graduate each year. On the other hand, China has established a multi-level training
system to nurture skilled workers vigorously [75]. All these achievements in education
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 14 of 28
have provided a primary guarantee for China’s rapid development and have cultivated
thousands of talents for the solar PV industry.
Figure 8. Solar radiation of China. Source: Global Solar Atlas 2.0, Solar Resource Data: SolarGIS. ©
, The World Bank.
2021
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 15 of 28
Figure 9. World record of conversion efficiency broken by Chinese solar PV companies (2013–
2019). Source: Nation Renewable Energy Laboratory: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html
(accessed on 23 April 2021).
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 16 of 28
Table 4. The challenges matrix of PEST for further development of solar PV power in China.
Since the direct administrative department of solar PV power generation is the Develop-
ment and Reform Commission, other departments are fragmented and separated. All the
above regulators are segregated and fragmented, specializing in their fields. Fences be-
tween administrative departments will hinder the overall progress of a solar PV project.
There have been cases of conflicts between the Land Resources Bureau and the Forestry
Bureau, which led to the dismantling of a solar PV power station already in commercial
operation. Many new business models have emerged in solar PV power generation such
as combining fisheries and solar PV power, the integration of agriculture and solar PV
power, and desertification prevention with solar PV power listed in the literature [27].
These new modes require updated green policy and coordination between the regulators
themselves and between market actors [87]. Cross-sectoral coordination is needed to elim-
inate fences and clear out obstacles to promoting the development of solar PV power,
hence, paving the way to achieving sustainable development and the 2030 carbon peak
mission.
1.70
1.68
1.65 1.64
1.60 1.60
1.55 1.57
1.50
1.45 1.47
1.43
1.40
1.35
1.33
1.30 1.31
1月-20 2月-20 3月-20 4月-20 5月-20 6月-20 7月-20 8月-20 9月-20 10月-20 11月-20 12月-20 1月-21 2月-21
Figure 10. Price trend of solar PV panels from January 2020 to February 2021. Source:
https://news.solarbe.com/202102/25/335122.html (accessed on 20 April 2020).
benchmark was CNY 2–20/m2, and a 50 MW power station needs to pay CNY 10 million
supplementary tax, which has caused a devastating hit to investors.
quarters [100]. Until now, social order has returned to pre-COVID-19 status in China, and
COVID-19 has sped up the Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0), which has enabled
enterprises to stay responsive to market needs. Still, sizeable potential risks remain un-
cleared, and COVID-19 may rebound exceptionally to damage the whole society. Conse-
quently, the solar PV power industry is inevitable.
Figure 11. UHV lines in operation and under construction. Source: state grid.
http://www.sgcc.com.cn/html/sgcc_main_en/col2017112610/column_2017112610_1.shtml (accessed
on 24 April 2021).
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 21 of 28
Multijuction Cells
• 47.1%(6-J,143x), NREL
• 44.4%(3-J,x),Sharp
• 39.2%(6-J),NREL
• 37.9%(IMM),Sharp
• 32.9%(3-J),NERL
Singaljuction
Figure 12. Overview of all the technical roadmaps of solar cells. Notes: Chinese solar PV players
are focused on crystalline silicon solar cells. Source: Nation Renewable Energy Laboratory:
https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 24 April 2021).
(economic, social, ecological) with transparency and stringent policy monitoring need to
be urgently established [27]. The last node in solar PV power generation that needs to
arouse people’s attention is the recycling procedures and technical standards. This refers
to the reuse of recyclable materials and disposal of wastes (unrecyclable rubbers, cement,
etc.) at the end of the commercial operation. The non-profit organization, PV CYCLE
(http://www.pvcycle.org/homepage/ (accessed on 18 April 2021)) offers tailor-made solu-
tions for solar PV panels under the mandatory obligations of WEEE. However, few studies
have focused on recycling technology in China and there are no mandatory governance
rules. Most of the operating solar PV power plants in China are less than ten years since
their COD, and the life-time of solar PV power stations is 25 years. It is time to duly con-
sider the recycling issue. Figure 13 demonstrates that 99.7% of the solar PV power gener-
ation were installed between 2011 and 2020.
55 240
50 220
45 200
40 180
160
35
140
30
120
25
100
20 80
15 60
10 40
2.70
5 0.84 20
0 0
P-2011 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
Figure 13. Yearly and cumulative installation volume (2011–2020). Source: CPIA [66] and orga-
nized by the authors.
interest rates. The government should mandate state-owned banks to release project fi-
nance to credible developers. Meanwhile, the planned green finance scheme should take
effect to sustain the deployment of solar PV power. Moreover, in the post-FIT era, cus-
tomized incentive policies must be introduced based on the coal-fired electricity tariff,
irradiation intensity, and installation capacity to maintain the economic viability of solar
PV systems, especially for northern China commercial and residential rooftops [109].
Social Aspect: The public’s participation plays a significant role in the sustainable
development and the adoption of REs. Studies have recommended that energy suppliers
and end-users should bear a differentiated mandatory obligation [110]. Currently, China
imposes RE ratios on power generation companies and limitations on carbon dioxide
emissions for large energy-consuming giants. It is strongly suggested that the government
implement incentive measures for all energy consumers including individuals. Personal
income deduction for the consumption of green electricity or purchasing Green Certifi-
cates can be realized with the support of big data technology. In big cities where applica-
ble, urban planning regulators and residents’ committees are encouraged to collaborate
to promote solar PV power generation.
Technological Aspect: UHV transmission technology has excellent performance in
transmitting REs to the consumption centers [104]. One reviewer disclosed that the stabil-
ity of UHV needs to be enhanced, and that some UHV transmission lines are operating at
50% capacity. Hence, UHV is not the sole key to dissolve curtailment on RE electricity.
More academic and technical research should be carried out relating to the coupling of
solar PV power generation with state-grid, solar PV power integrated with storage sys-
tems, and even solar PV technology with hydrogen technology. For solar PV industry
technology, we can conclude that Chinese private solar companies can be attributed to the
breakthrough of solar cell efficiency and only focus on crystalline silicon cells [111]. Re-
search institutions and universities with abundant R&D support are advised to participate
in the fundamental research and other roadmaps.
sufficient. However, in recent years, millions of households across the country have been
eager to access technical supervision. Solar PV companies have to set up an after-sales
service network to fill the gaps.
Technological Aspect: China’s solar PV industry is committed to the R&D, produc-
tion, and sales of crystalline silicon cells. Significant effect of technology advancement and
scale economies have been accomplished. However, exclusive focus on one type of tech-
nology will lead to the ignorance of other technologies. The second curve theory implies
that the Chinese solar industry should set foot in new technological fields such as perov-
skite cells and thin-film cells. On the other hand, with the ambitious targets of carbon peak
by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2060, new additional modes of a low-carbon economy
will knock the market. The whole solar PV power industry chain needs to strengthen their
collaborative innovation to improve their innovation capabilities. They also need to learn
about storage technology, hydrogen technology to accomplish cross-border cooperation.
7.2. Discussions
The PEST analysis framework was adopted to explore the potential opportunities
and challenges of solar PV power in China under the carbon peak scenario. However,
some limitations need further study in the future. At the outset, PEST is a qualitative anal-
ysis approach. The weights of each factor are not quantified; thus, the importance of each
element cannot be classified. Second, solar PV power is only one member of the RE re-
sources group. Research focused on comparative advantages in terms of economy and
technology between solar PV power and other RE resources (wind power, hydropower,
etc.) needs to be conducted to promote the comprehensive development of all REs. The
fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) could be an alternative methodology. Third, in
the post-FIT era, green finance has to be introduced, but how to promote it in a sustainable
way and strengthen supervision needs more research. Moreover, the effectiveness of
green fund, green trust, and green lease needs to be compared to promote green finance
pertinently. Finally, due to the spontaneous limitations of solar PV power, it needs to be
integrated with new technologies such as smart grid, hydrogen energy, EVs, and further
studies require interdisciplinary cooperation.
Author Contributions: Conceptualization, H.W. and X.Y.; Methodology, H.W. and X.Y.; Validation,
X.Y.; Formal analysis, H.W.; Investigation, H.W., X.Y., X.X., and L.F.; Resources, H.W., X.Y., and
L.F.; Data curation, H.W. and X.Y.; Writing—original draft preparation, H.W.; Writing—review and
editing, H.W., X.Y., X.X., and L.F.; Visualization, X.Y. and L.F.; Supervision, H.W. and X.Y.; Project
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 25 of 28
administration, X.Y.; Funding acquisition, X.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published
version of the manuscript.
Funding: This research was funded by the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China
under the 2018 Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research (grant number 18JZD032).
Institutional Review Board Statement: Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement: Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement: The data presented in this study are openly available in the China
Statistics and China Energy White Paper, reference number [1,2,11,26,59].
Acknowledgments: The authors sincerely thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their in-
sightful comments and suggestions. Furthermore, the authors would like to thank all the 43 inter-
viewees who took their time to participate in the consultations and made valuable suggestions.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the
design of the study, in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data, in the writing of the manu-
script, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
1. OECD. OECD Economic Surveys: China 2019; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2019.
2. OECD. Economic Outlook for Southeast. Asia, China and India 2021: Reallocating Resources for Digitalization; OECD Publishing: Paris,
France, 2021.
3. IEA. World Energy Outlook 2011; International Energy Agency: Paris, France; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2011.
4. Jianfei, S.; Song, X.; Ming, Z.; Yi, W.; Yuejin, W.; Xiaoli, L.; Zhijie, W. Low-carbon development strategies for the top five power
generation groups during China׳s 12th Five-Year Plan period. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 34, 350–360.
5. Zhu, Y.; Pei, J.; Cao, C.; Zhai, R.; Yang, Y.; Reyes-Belmonte, M.A.; González-Aguilar, J.; Romero, M. Optimization of solar aided
coal-fired power plant layouts using multi-criteria assessment. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2018, 137, 406–418.
6. NEA. China’s 12th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development. National Energy Administration. Available online:
http://www.nea.gov.cn/2013-01/28/c_132132808.htm (accessed on 10 April 2021).
7. NEA. China’s 13th Five-Year Plan for Energy Development. National Energy Administration. Available online:
http://www.nea.gov.cn/2017-01/17/c_135989417.htm (accessed on 10 April 2021).
8. Millstein, D.; Wiser, R.; Bolinger, M.; Barbose, G. The climate and air-quality benefits of wind and solar power in the United
States. Nat. Energy 2017, 2, 1–10.
9. Parida, B.; Iniyan, S.; Goic, R. A review of solar photovoltaic technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1625–1636.
10. Bimenyimana, S.; Asemota, G.N.O.; De Dieu Niyonteze, J.; Nsengimana, C.; Ihirwe, P.J.; Li, L.; Álvarez-Gallegos, A. Photovoltaic
solar technologies: Solution to affordable, sustainable, and reliable energy access for all in Rwanda. Available online:
https://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/ijp/2019/5984206.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2021).
11. IRENA. Renewable Capacity Statistics 2021; International Renewable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2021.
12. Sood, G.; Rao, P. Safeguard duty imposition impacting solar tariffs in India. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 2019, 8,3514-3520.
13. Kumar Sahu, B. A study on global solar PV energy developments and policies with special focus on the top ten solar PV power
producing countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 43, 621–634.
14. Wand, R.; Leuthold, F. Feed-in tariffs for photovoltaics: Learning by doing in Germany? Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4387–4399.
15. Heng, Y.; Lu, C.; Yu, L.; Gao, Z. The heterogeneous preferences for solar energy policies among US households. Energy Policy
2020, 137, 111187.
16. Li, A.; Xu, Y.; Shiroyama, H. Solar lobby and energy transition in Japan. Energy Policy 2019, 134, 110950.
17. Sahoo, S.K. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews solar photovoltaic energy progress in India: A review. Renew. Sustain.
Energy Rev. 2016, 59, 927–939.
18. Behuria, P. The politics of late late development in renewable energy sectors: Dependency and contradictory tensions in India’s
National Solar Mission. World Dev. 2020, 126, 104726.
19. Zhang, S.; He, Y. Analysis on the development and policy of solar PV power in China. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 393–
401.
20. Ye, L.; Rodrigues, J.F.D.; Lin, H.X. Analysis of feed-in tariff policies for solar photovoltaic in China 2011–2016. Appl. Energy 2017,
203, 496–505.
21. CSI. 2019 Annual Report; Canadian Solar Inc.: Suzhou, China, 2020.
22. JKS. JinkoSolar 2019 Annual Report; JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.: Shanghai, China, 2020.
23. MOFA. Statement by Xi jinping president of the People’s Republic of China at the General Debate of the 75th session of the
United Nations general assembly. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, PRC. Available online:
https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/zxxx_662805/t1817098.shtml (accessed on 11 April 2021).
24. BP. Energy Outlook 2020 Edition; BP p.l.c.: London, UK, 2020.
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 26 of 28
25. Zhao, R.; Shi, G.; Chen, H.; Ren, A.; Finlow, D. Present status and prospects of photovoltaic market in China. Energy Policy 2010,
39, 2204–2207.
26. IRENA. Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2019; International Renawable Energy Agency: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates,
2020.
27. Shen, W.; He, J.; Yao, S. Green industrial policy in the post grid parity era: Governing integrated Solar+ projects in China. Energy
Policy 2021, 150, 112129.
28. Ahmad, S.; Tahar, R.M.; Muhammad-Sukki, F.; Munir, A.B.; Rahim, R.A. Role of feed-in tariff policy in promoting solar photo-
voltaic investments in Malaysia: A system dynamics approach. Energy 2015, 84, 808–815.
29. Gallego-Castillo, C.; Victoria, M. Cost-free feed-in tariffs for renewable energy deployment in Spain. Renew. Energy 2015, 81,
411–420.
30. Hamisu Umar, N.; Bora, B.; Banerjee, C.; Gupta, P.; Anjum, N. Performance and economic viability of the PV system in different
climatic zones of Nigeria. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 43, 100987.
31. Ouyang, X.; Lin, B. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of renewable energies and required subsidies in China. Energy Policy
2014, 70, 64–73.
32. Zhang, M.M.; Zhou, P.; Zhou, D.Q. A real options model for renewable energy investment with application to solar photovoltaic
power generation in China. Energy Econ. 2016, 59, 213–226.
33. Kayser, D. Solar photovoltaic projects in China: High investment risks and the need for institutional response. Appl. Energy 2016,
174, 144–152.
34. Rodrigues, S.; Chen, X.; Morgado-Dias, F. Economic analysis of photovoltaic systems for the residential market under China’s
new regulation. Energy Policy 2017, 101, 467–472.
35. Yan, J.; Yang, Y.; Campana, P.E.; He, J. City-level analysis of subsidy-free solar photovoltaic electricity price, profits and grid
parity in China. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 709–717.
36. Li, C.; Wang, H.; Miao, H.; Ye, B. The economic and social performance of integrated photovoltaic and agricultural greenhouses
systems: Case study in China. Appl. Energy 2017, 190, 204–212.
37. Liu, Y.; Yang, D.; Xu, H. Factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for low-carbon products: A simulation study in China.
Bus. Strategy Environ. 2017, 26, 972–984.
38. Liu, Y.; Zhang, M. Unpacking stereotypes about sustainable energy: Knowledge, policy, and public misperceptions of solar
energy and coal in China. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2021, 71, 101832.
39. Zhao, Y. The present status and future of photovoltaic in China. Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C 2001, 67, 663–671.
40. Lei, X.; Zhao, Z.; Zhang, X.; Chen, D.; Huang, M.; Zheng, J.; Liu, R.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y. Technological collaboration patterns in
solar cell industry based on patent inventors and assignees analysis. Scientometrics 2013, 96, 427–441.
41. Lin, B.; Luan, R. Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China's photovoltaic enterprises?
J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120108.
42. Li, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Li, L.; Hua, Y.; Liu, W. Analysis of status of photovoltaic and wind power abandoned in China. J. Power
Energy Eng. 2017, 5, 91.
43. Sun, Y.; Chen, S.; Xie, L.; Hong, R.; Shen, H.; Yang, H. Investigating the Impact of Shading Effect on the Characteristics of a
Large-Scale Grid-Connected PV Power Plant in Northwest China. Available online: https://downloads.hindawi.com/jour-
nals/ijp/2014/763106.pdf (accessed on 24 May 2021).
44. Zhang, M.; Xie, T.; Zhang, C.; Chen, D.; Mao, C.; Shen, C. Dynamic model and impact on power quality of large hydro-photo-
voltaic power complementary plant. Int. J. Energy Res. 2019, 43, 4436–4448.
45. Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Lian, J.; Pang, X.; Qiao, Y.; Chaima, E. Optimal photovoltaic capacity of large-scale hydro-photovoltaic com-
plementary systems considering electricity delivery demand and reservoir characteristics. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 195,
597–608.
46. Zhang, S.; Tang, Y. Optimal schedule of grid-connected residential PV generation systems with battery storages under time-of-
use and step tariffs. J. Energy Storage 2019, 23, 175–182.
47. Li, C. Techno-economic study of off-grid hybrid photovoltaic/battery and photovoltaic/battery/fuel cell power systems in Kun-
ming, China. Energy Sourcespart. A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 41, 1588–1604.
48. Sierra, A.; Gercek, C.; Geurs, K.; Reinders, A. Technical, financial, and environmental feasibility analysis of photovoltaic EV
charging stations with energy storage in China and the United States. IEEE J. Photovolt. 2020, 10, 1892–1899.
49. Igliński, B.; Iglińska, A.; Cichosz, M.; Kujawski, W.; Buczkowski, R. Renewable energy production in the Łódzkie Voivodeship.
The PEST analysis of the RES in the Voivodeship and in Poland. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 58, 737–750.
50. Francis, J.A. Scanning the Business Environment; Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 1967.
51. Healey, N.M. The transition economic of central and eastern Europe. Columbia J. World Bus. 1994, 29, 62–70.
52. Patel, M.K.; Prajapati, K.B. PEST analysis for Indian two-wheeler automobile industry. Asian J. Res. Bus. Econ. Manag. 2014, 4,
109–118.
53. Réka, B. Bank marketing environment. Pest analysis for the Romanian bank system. J. Contemp. Econ. 2018, 3, 192–197.
54. Kolomiets, A.; Grinchenkov, D.; Vodenko, K. PEST and SWOT analysis of university internationalization factors. J. Phys. Conf.
Ser. 2019, 1415, 12003.
55. Alava, R.P.; Murillo, J.M.; Zambrano, R.B.; Velez, M.I.Z.; Vazquez, M.L. PEST analysis based on neutrosophic cognitive maps:
A case study for food industry. Neutrosophic Sets Syst. 2018, 21, 84–92.
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 27 of 28
56. Qiong, W.; Si, C.; Qinghua, Z. An industrial competitive intelligence analysis of smart wearable devices for the elderly people
based on the industrial chain. Inf. Stud. Theory Appl. 2020, 43, 38–44.
57. Mainali, B.; Mahapatra, K.; Pardalis, G. Strategies for deep renovation market of detached houses. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.
2021, 138, 110659.
58. Zhang, L.; Guo, S.; Wu, Z.; Alsaedi, A.; Hayat, T. SWOT analysis for the promotion of energy efficiency in rural buildings: A
case study of China. Energies 2018, 11, 851.
59. SCIO. Energy in China's New Era. Available online: http://english.www.gov.cn/archive/whitepaper/202012/21/con-
tent_WS5fe0572bc6d0f725769423cb.html (accessed on 24 May 2021).
60. Nbsp, P.A.; Buigues; Nbsp, K.; Sekkat Industrial Policy in Europe, Japan and the USA; Palgrave Macmillan: London, UK, 2009.
61. Guild, J. Feed-in-tariffs and the politics of renewable energy in Indonesia and the Philippines. Asia Pac. Policy Stud. 2019, 6, 417–
431.
62. SCOC. Decision of the State Council on Cultivating and Accelerating Development of Strategic Emergency Industries. State
Council of China. Available online: http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2010-10/18/content_1274.htm (accessed on 16 April
2021).
63. Zhou, X.; Qu, Y.; Fang, S. A comparative study of policies to support the development of strategic emerging industries between
China and Japan. In Advances in Education Research; Lee, G., Ed.; Office of Research, Office of Educational Research and Im-
provement: Washington, DC, USA, 2015; Volume 83, pp. 33–37.
64. Dong, F.; Yu, B.; Hadachin, T.; Dai, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Long, R. Drivers of carbon emission intensity change in China. Resour.
Conserv. Amp Recycl. 2018, 129, 187–201.
65. UNFCCC. 192 Parties have Submitted their first NDCs. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Available
online: https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/NDCStaging/Pages/All.aspx (accessed on 16 April 2021).
66. Bohua, W. Review of 2020 and Outlook for 2021 of Chinese Solar PV Industry; China Photovoltaic Industry Association: Beijing,
China, 2021.
67. OECD. OECD Economic Outlook, Volume 2020 Issue 2, No.108; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2020.
68. PVTECH. Bids of US$0.0162/kWh Emerge as Saudi Arabia Shortlists Firms for 1.47GW Solar Tender. Available online:
https://www.pv-tech.org/bids-of-us0-0162-kwh-emerge-as-saudi-arabia-shortlists-firms-for-1-47gw-sol/ (accessed on 17 April
2021).
69. Wang, H.; Yang, X.; Lou, Q.; Xu, X. Achieving a sustainable development process by deployment of solar PV power in ASEAN:
A SWOT analysis. Processes 2021, 9, 630.
70. Apte, J.S.; Marshall, J.D.; Cohen, A.J.; Brauer, M. Addressing Global Mortality from Ambient PM2.5. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015,
49, 8057–8066.
71. Zhou, M.; Wang, H.; Zeng, X.; Yin, P.; Zhu, J.; Chen, W.; Li, X.; Wang, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Y.; et al. Mortality, morbidity, and risk
factors in China and its provinces, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet 2019,
394, 1145–1158.
72. CCTV. Carbon Neutral Countdown. China Central Television. Available online:
http://tv.cctv.com/2021/04/10/VIDEcG0nqU4PoLFDdd7yhZ3R210410.shtml (accessed on 18 April 2021).
73. CCTV. Carbon Netural Cutdown: Hydrofen Energy. China Central Television. Available online:
https://tv.cctv.com/2021/04/17/VIDEmayXE47xLM8NgdvjiwWA210417.shtml (accessed on 18 April 2021).
74. CCTV. China's Solar PV Industry: From followers to Learder. China Central Television. Available online:
https://tv.cctv.com/2020/11/21/VIDE6uWqj6W6YwAZtqSnZB7V201121.shtml (accessed on 19 April 2021).
75. MOE. Overview of Chinese Education (2019). Ministry of Education, PRC. Available online:
http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_sjzl/s5990/202008/t20200831_483697.html (accessed on 19 April 2021).
76. Nastasi, B.; Di Matteo, U. Solar energy technologies in sustainable energy action plans of Italian big cities. Energy Procedia 2016,
101, 1064–1071.
77. ESMAP. Global Photovoltaic Power Potential by Country; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2020.
78. Choi, Y.; Rayl, J.; Tammineedi, C.; Brownson, J.R.S. PV Analyst: Coupling ArcGIS with TRNSYS to assess distributed photovol-
taic potential in urban areas. Sol. Energy 2011, 85, 2924–2939.
79. Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L. Research on coupling coordination development for photovoltaic agriculture system in China. Sus-
tainability 2019, 11, 1065.
80. Pierre-Alexandre, C.; Wunderlich, R.F.; Teng-Wei, W.; Hong-Thih, L.; Che-Chun, C.; Fi-John, C. Mathematical modeling sug-
gests high potential for the deployment of floating photovoltaic on fish ponds. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 687, 654–666.
81. Principe, J.; Takeuchi, W. Supply and demand assessment of solar PV as Off-Grid option in Asia-Pacific region with remotely
sensed data. Remote. Sens. 2019, 11, 2255.
82. XHN. Commemorating the 30th Anniversary of Reform and Opening-up :1978–2008. XinHua News Press. Available online:
http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/kxjssdyscl/ (accessed on 20 April 2021).
83. Cornell, U.; INSEAD; WIPO. The Global Innovation Index 2020: Who Will Finance Innovation? World Intellectual Property Organi-
zation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021.
84. Ye, B.; Yang, P.; Jiang, J.; Miao, L.; Shen, B.; Li, J. Feasibility and economic analysis of a renewable energy powered special town
in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 121, 40–50.
Energies 2021, 14, 3061 28 of 28
85. STA. Notice on the Value-Added Tax Policy for Solar PV Power Generation. State Taxation Administration. Available online:
http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/n810341/n810755/c1148696/content.html (accessed on 20 April 2021).
86. STA. Notice on Further Implementation of the Value-Added Tax Policy for Solar PV Power Generation. State Taxation Admin-
istration. Available online: http://www.chinatax.gov.cn/n810341/n810755/c2250537/content.html (accessed on 20 April 2021).
87. Altenburg, T.; Assmann, C. Green Industrial Policy. Concept, Policies, Country Experiences; UN Environment, German Development
Institute/Deutsches Institut fürEntwicklungspolitk (DIE): Geneva, Swizerland; Bonn, Germany, 2017.
88. NPC. Renewable Energy Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised version). National People’s Congress of the People’s
Republic of China. Available online: http://www.npc.gov.cn/zgrdw/npc/zt/qt/2013zhhbsjx/2013-12/04/content_1815400.htm (ac-
cessed on 20 April 2021).
89. Ruiz, H.S.; Sunarso, A.; Ibrahim-Bathis, K.; Murti, S.A.; Budiarto, I. GIS-AHP Multi Criteria Decision Analysis for the optimal
location of solar energy plants at Indonesia. Energy Rep. 2020, 6, 3249–3263.
90. PVINFOLINK. Cell Prices Rose Marginally Amid Continued Upward Price Trends in Mid and Upstream Segments. Available
online: https://www.infolink-group.com/en/solar/spot-price (accessed on 20 April 2021).
91. Zhang, M.M.; Zhang, C.; Liu, L.Y.; Zhou, D.Q. Is it time to launch grid parity in the Chinese solar photovoltaic industry? Evi-
dence from 335 cities. Energy Policy 2020, 147, 111733.
92. MOL. Directions on Poverty Alleviation Solar PV Power Projects and Regulating Land Use. Minstry of Land Resources, PRC.
Available online: http://www.mnr.gov.cn/gk/tzgg/201710/t20171010_1992672.html (accessed on 21 April 2021).
93. MOL. Directions on Supporting Development of New Industries to Promote Mass Entrepreneurship and Innovation for Land
Use. Minstry of Land Resources, PRC. Available online: http://www.mnr.gov.cn/dt/zb/2016/ys/bei-
jingziliao/201509/t20150918_2127937.html (accessed on 21 April 2021).
94. Hai, M.A. Rethinking the social acceptance of solar energy: Exploring “states of willingness” in Finland. Energy Res. Soc. Sci.
2019, 51, 96–106.
95. Happle, G.; Shi, Z.; Hsieh, S.; Ong, B.; Fonseca, J.A.; Schlueter, A. Identifying carbon emission reduction potentials of BIPV in
high-density cities in Southeast Asia. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2019, 1343, 12077.
96. Mancini, F.; Nastasi, B. Solar energy data analytics: PV deployment and land use. Energies 2020, 13, 417.
97. Anderson, R.M.; Heesterbeek, H.; Klinkenberg, D.; Hollingsworth, T.D. How will country-based mitigation measures influence
the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 2020, 395, 931–934.
98. WHO. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic, Numbers at a Glance. World Health Organzation. Available online:
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019 (accessed on 21 April 2021).
99. Vaka, M.; Walvekar, R.; Rasheed, A.K.; Khalid, M. A review on Malaysia’s solar energy pathway towards carbon-neutral Ma-
laysia beyond COVID-19 pandemic. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 122834.
100. Yazhi, S.; Tiansen, L.; Yin, L.; Bin, Y. The influence of COVID-19 on grid parity of China’s photovoltaic industry. Environ. Geochem.
Health 2020, 28, 1–6.
101. Tavakoli, A.; Saha, S.; Arif, M.T.; Haque, M.E.; Mendis, N.; Oo, A.M.T. Impacts of grid integration of solar PV and electric vehicle
on grid stability, power quality and energy economics: A review. IET Energy Syst. Integr. 2020, 2, 243–260.
102. Riffonneau, Y.; Bacha, S.; Barruel, F.; Ploix, S. Optimal power flow management for grid connected PV systems with batteries.
IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy 2011, 2, 309–320.
103. Li, J.; Huang, J. The expansion of China's solar energy: Challenges and policy options. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 132,
110002.
104. Li, J.; Lin, B. Environmental impact of electricity relocation: A quasi-natural experiment from interregional electricity transmis-
sion. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2017, 66, 151–161.
105. Christensen, C.M. The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great firms to Fail, 3rd ed.; Harvord Business Press:
Boston, MA, USA, 2016.
106. Matsuo, T.; Schmidt, T.S. Managing tradeoffs in green industrial policies: The role of renewable energy policy design. World Dev.
2019, 122, 11–26.
107. Steffen, B. The importance of project finance for renewable energy projects. Energy Econ. 2018, 69, 280–294.
108. Falcone, P.M. Environmental regulation and green investments: The role of green finance. Int. J. Green Econ. 2020, 14, 159–173.
109. D Adamo, I.; Falcone, P.M.; Gastaldi, M.; Morone, P. The economic viability of photovoltaic systems in public buildings: Evi-
dence from Italy. Energy 2020, 207, 118316.
110. Bertoldi, P.; Labanca, N.; Rezessy, S.; Steuwer, S.; Oikonomou, V. Where to place the saving obligation: Energy end-users or
suppliers? Energy Policy 2013, 63, 328–337.
111. NREL. Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the UAS. Available online:
https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (accessed on 23 April 2021).
112. Schmidt, T.S. Low-carbon investment risks and de-risking. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2014, 4, 237–239.