Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3
Committee: World Health Organization
Topic: Addressing the crisis of the world fertility rate
Country: Spain Name: Nguyễn Khánh Linh The fertility rate is the average number of children a woman would have over her lifetime if she followed age-related fertility rates (ASFRs) and survived from birth to the end of her reproductive years. The fertility rate is calculated by summing age-specific rates for a year at a given time. Assuming net migration is excluded and the mortality rate remains constant, a fertility rate of 2.1 children per woman suggests that the population remains stable, which is also known as replacement level. The birth rate holds an important position in reflecting the economic status and social stability of a country. Unfortunately, many countries, especially the developed and prosperous ones, are currently facing a dramatic decline in the birth rate, leading to undesirable effects on both economic and social life, including labor shortages and an aging population. This is regarded as a global demographic trajectory, which would have a profound impact on a nation’s development in various ways. In the past few years, many pragmatic resolutions were taken globally to help curb this disturbing trend. During the 1970s and 1980s, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Romania, and the Soviet Union implemented policies to encourage families to have more than one child. In the 1970s, the government of Czechoslovakia spent 10% of the national budget on childcare service subsidies and other related payments. Despite the early 1990s recession’s budgetary pressure and the expensiveness of those policies, several countries had made even greater efforts in raising fertility schemes by adopting new schemes to encourage child-bearing. In 2005, it was noted that childcare spending accounted for nearly 60.8% of GDP per capita in the Czech Republic and 51.3% in Slovakia. Russia launched a capital fund for mothers in 2007, providing mothers with a second or third child 250,000 rubles (about 12,000 USD), equivalent to the annual average income. 6th Global Symposium on Low Fertility and Population Ageing taking place at Seoul, Republic of Korea in 2022 was held by UNFPA and the Korea Statistics Agency (KOSTAT). It gathered around 120 parliamentarians, ministers, and other experts from the UN and civil organizations to discuss the potential causes and feasible measures of the low birth rate issue. Moreover, the UK and other European countries had funded a program for Fertility Treatment, which was to be under the control of the Department of Health in 2009. This was to help resolve the problem of inadequate service in assisted conception and promote access to fertility care. Despite the effort aforementioned, the question of whether such schemes would bring about long-term benefits still sounds speculative. Italy, for example, having applied the policy of allocating €800 payment per couple per birth, is still among one of the nations that have the lowest fertility rate in the EU, with 1.3 children per woman. Such failure of providing incentives seems to mainly stem from the general attitude. The tendency of young couples deciding to delay marriage and the ever-existing health-relating preoccupation towards child-bearing, for instance, pose a real sense of burden to the global protection of fertility. Spain is one of the countries that suffers significantly from the low level of fertility. The birth rate in Spain has faced a down-curve wave since the 1970s, from 2.86 to 1.19 in 2021. Declining fertility has an undesirable influence on both individuals and society. It is the high rate of unemployment, low salary, and unaffordable child-bearing services for young parents that discourage them from having multiple children. Accordingly, the gap between the woman’s expected and achieved fertility is widened, which is likely to arouse personal dissatisfaction and potential frustration. In addition, by 2050 Spain will be one of the oldest countries in the world, according to UN estimates. The proportion of the population aged 65 and over is projected to reach 36.8% by 2050, surpassed only by Japan (37.7%) and South Korea (38.1%). This occurrence of an aging population does pose a threat to Spain’s national budget spent on pensions and the elderly care system. The problem of the decline in taxpayers is equally worth noting. Low fertility increases female labor force participation and increases federal income tax. But because women have fewer children than in previous years, fewer workers may end up paying income tax. Since 1980, the policy of employees working fewer hours to care for children under 6 or family members with illnesses has been applied. The program of parental leave is expanded, now 16 weeks and 18 weeks in the case of disabled children. Since 2003, working mothers covered by social insurance have been entitled to an annual payment of €1,200 per child. The enhancement of return-to-work guarantees was established in 1989 and the dismissal of maternity was prohibited after 1999. The birth rate has increased slightly over the past decades due to foreign-born women having children in Spain and the slowing of child-bearing postponement. However, we recognize and admit the fact that such family policies alone cannot tackle the ingrained issues of Spain’s precarious economy and the effect of cultural change. Young people in Spain tend to start an independent life quite late, at 30 years old on average due to the job market precariousness, so it is necessary that the social protection against unstable employment be more widely applied. Secularism and delayed age of marriage in Spain also contributes to fertility stagnation and decline in general family size. We would therefore enforce more feasible schemes of tax deduction, consider investing more into the construction of free childcare centers as well as pre-conception clinics and launch proper social programs focused on culture that encourage child-bearing. Spain would propose that governments provide fully funded reproductive and social health care to achieve the required birth rates and have a younger population to contribute to national and global progress as women in today's time play a key role in the total workforce and social welfare, so, understandably, they deserve reproductive benefits. At the same time, national and international initiatives on infertility prevention and fertility protection are also needed. Projects should address the specific needs of local people. Governments need to work closely with the voluntary sector to achieve maximum impact. We recommend that the most crucial step seems to be the adjustment in education to raise general awareness at individual, family, and community levels about the factors affecting fertility in men and women. To prevent future infertility, it is significant to plan a practical and meaningful program for reproductive health during the secondary years. Propaganda campaigns had better be launched on a larger scale and with more detailed instructions. In conclusion, Spain attempts to put forward some resolutions to help address the issue mentioned above. Citation: https://data.oecd.org/pop/fertility-rates.htm#:~:text=The%20total%20fertility%20rate %20in,prevailing%20age%2Dspecific%20fertility%20rates https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Total_fertility_rate https://www.economist.com/leaders/2023/06/01/global-fertility-has-collapsed-with-profound- economic-consequenceshttps://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/ www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/undesa_pd_2021_wpp-fertility_policies.pdf https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/expert/24/Policy_Briefs/ PB_Spain.pdf https://elobservatoriosocial.fundacionlacaixa.org/en/-/why-don-t-women-have-all-the-children- they-say-they-want- https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-mar-19-mn-10358-story.html https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol19/27/19-27.pdf