CHAPTER III

3.1 PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

Table 3.1.1 Age Wise Classification of the Respondents

SNO Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Below 20 0 0
2 20-25 Years 10 10.0
3 25-30 years 37 37.0
4 30-35 years 24 24.0
5 Above 35 years 29 29.0

Total 100 100.00

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.1 shows that, 10% of the respondents are 20-25 Years,37% of the
respondents are 25-30 years,24% of the respondents are 30-35 years and 29.0% of the
respondents are Above 35 years.
Chart 3.1.1 Age Wise Classification of the Respondents
Table 3.1.2 Education -Wise Classification of the Respondents

SNO Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Under Graduate 53 53.0
2 Post Graduate 47 47.0
Total 100 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.2 shows that, 53.0% of the respondents are Under Graduate, 47%
of the respondents are Post Graduate.
Chart 3.1.2 Education -Wise Classification of the Respondents
Table 3.1.3 Area Wise Classification of the Respondents

SNO Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Urban 53 53.0
2 Rural 47 47.0
Total 100 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.3 shows that, 53.0% of the respondents are Urban, 47.0% of the
respondents are Rural.
Chart 3.1.3 Area Wise Classification of the Respondents

70
63
60

50 48
Percentage

40

30

20

10
1 2
0
Female Male
Gender wise classification of the respondents

Table 3.1.4 Experience -Wise Classification of the Respondents

 SNO Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Below 2 Years 16 16.0
2 2-4 Years 23 23.0
3 4-6 Years 16 16.0
4 Above 6 years 45 45.0
Total 111 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.4 shows that, 16.0% of the respondents are below 2 Years,
23.0% of the respondents are 2-4 Years,16.0% of the respondents are 4-6 years and 45%
respondents are above 6 years.
Chart 3.1.4 Experience -Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.5 Joining Time Salary -Wise Classification of the Respondents

 SNO Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Below 15000 12 12.0%
2 Rs15000-25000 14 14.0%
3 Rs25000-35000 24 24.0%
4 Rs35000-45000 19 19.0%
5 Above Rs45000 31 31.0%
Total 100 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.5 shows that, 12.0% of the respondents are Below
15000,14.0% of the respondents are Rs15000-25000.24.0% of the respondents are 25000-
35000,19.0% of the respondents are 35000-45000,31.0% of the respondents are Above
45000.
Chart 3.1.5 Joining Time Salary -Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.6 Present Salary -Wise Classification of the Respondents

 SNO Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Below 15000 12 12.0%
2 Rs15000-25000 14 14.0%
3 Rs25000-35000 24 24.0%
4 Rs35000-45000 19 19.0%
5 Above Rs45000 31 31.0%
Total 100 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.6 shows that, 12.0% of the respondents are Below
15000,14.0% of the respondents are Rs15000-25000.24.0% of the respondents are 25000-
35000,19.0% of the respondents are 35000-45000,31.0% of the respondents are Above
45000.
Chart 3.1.6 Present Salary - Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.7 Marital -Wise Classification of the Respondents

S.no Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Married 50 50.0%
2 Unmarried 50 50.0%
Total 100 100.0
Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.7 shows 50% of the respondents are Married, 50% of the
respondents are Unmarried.

Chart 3.1.7 Marital -Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.8 Family-Wise Classification of the Respondents

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

 1 Joined 37 37.0%
2 Nuclear 63 63.0%
Total 100 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.8 shows that 37.0% of the respondents are Joined Family,63.0% of
the respondents are Nuclear Family.

Chart 3.1.8 Family-Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.9 Nature of the Team - Wise Classification of the Respondents

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 HR Team 11 10.2%
2 Recruitment 58 53.7%
Team
3 Delivery Team 16 14.8%
4 Back-Office 4 3.7%
Team
5 Administration 11 10.2%
Team
6 IT Team 8 7.4%
Total 108 100.0%

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.9 shows that 10.2% of the respondents are HR Team,53.7% of the
respondents are Recruitment Team,14.8% of the respondents are Delivery team,3.7% of the
respondents are Back-office team,10.2% of the respondents are Administration Team,7.4%
of the respondents are IT Team.

Chart 3.1.9 Nature of the Team - Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.10 Designation - Wise Classification of the Respondents

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Managing Director 0 0
2 Team Leader 73 67.6%
3 Project Associate 4 3.7%
4 Quality Associate 31 28.7%
5 Project Manager 0 0
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.10 shows that 67.6% of the respondents are Team Leader,3.7% of
the respondents are Project Associate,28.7% of the respondents are Quality Associate.

Chart 3.1.10 Designation - Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.11 Working Hours- Wise Classification of the Respondents

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Below 8 Hours 0 0
2 8 Hours 53 49.1%
3 9 Hours 55 50.9%
4 10 Hours 0 0
5 Above 10 Hours 0 0
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.11 shows that 49.1% of the respondents are 8 Hours,50.9% of the
respondents are 9 Hours.

Chart 3.1.11 Working Hours- Wise Classification of the Respondents

Table 3.1.12 Respondents towards Distance between Office and Home.

 SNo Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Less than 5 kms 28 25.9%
2 5-10 Kms 40 37.0%
3 11-15 Kms 14 13.0%
4 16-20 Kms 26 24.1%
5 More than 20 Kms 0 0

Source: Total 108 100.0 Primary

Data

From the table 3.1.12 shows that 25.9% of the respondents are Less than 5
kms,37.0% of the respondents are 5-10 kms,13.0% of the respondents are 11-15 kms,24.1 %
of the respondents are 16-20 kms.

Chart 3.1.12 Respondents towards Distance between Office and Home.

Table 3.1.13 Respondents towards Employees Mode of Transportation

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 By Two-Wheeler 47 43.5
2 By Company Vehicle 61 56.5
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.13 shows that 43.5% of the respondents are by 2-Wheeler, 56.5%
of the respondents are by Company Vehicle.

Chart 3.1.13 Respondents towards Employees Mode of Transportation

Table 3.1.14 Respondents towards Identity Card in the Organization.

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strictly Followed 108 100.0%
2 Not Strictly Followed 0 0
Total 108 100.0
Source: Primary
Data

From the table 3.1.14 shows that 100.0% of the respondents are Strictly Followed.

Chart 3.1.14 Respondents towards Identity Card in the Organization.

Table 3.1.15 Respondents towards Maintenance of Attendance

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Maintained by Electronic 108 100.0%
Device
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.15 shows that 100.0%% of the respondents are Maintained by
electronic Device.

Chart 3.1.15 Respondents towards Maintenance of Attendance

Table 3.1.16 Respondents towards Recognition Received by employees.

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Through Special Gift 52 48.1%
2 Through Incentives 56 51.9%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.16 shows that 48.1% of the respondents are Through Special
gift,51.9% of the respondents are Through Incentives.

Chart 3.1.16 Respondents towards Recognition Received by employees.

Table 3.1.17 Respondents towards Special Programs Conducted by Managements

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Skill Building 29 26.9%
2 Healthcare Program 38 35.2%
3 Training for New 41 38.0%
Joiners
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.17 shows that 26.9% of the respondents are Skill Building, 35.2%
of the respondents are Healthcare Program, 38.0% of the respondents are Training for New
Joiners.

Chart 3.1.17 Respondents towards Special Programs Conducted by Managements

Table 3.1.18 Respondents towards Off-days in a week.

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 2 Days 108 100%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.18 shows that 100% of the respondents are 2 Off-days in a
week.

Chart 3.1.18 Respondents towards Off-days in a week.

Table 3.1.19 Respondents towards Leave allotted for Maternity Period.

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 2-3 Months 34 31.2%
2 More than 3 Months 75 68.8%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.19 shows that 31.2% of the respondents are 2-3 Moths, 68% of the
respondents are More than 3 Months.

Chart 3.1.19 Respondents towards Leave allotted for Maternity Period.

Table 3.1.20 Respondents towards Discrimination in work

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Additional Benefits 22 20.2%
2 No Discrimination 86 79.6%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.20 shows that 20.2% of the respondents are Additional benefits,
79.6% of the respondents are No Discrimination.

Chart 3.1.20 Respondents towards Discrimination in work

Table 3.1.21 Respondents towards Saving habits

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Bank 34 31.5%
2 Post Office 5 4.6%
3 Insurance 50 46.3%
4 Chitfunds 19 17.6%
Total 111 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.21 shows that 50.5% of the respondents are Satisfied, 28.8% of the
respondents are Highly satisfied, 19.8% of the respondents are Moderate, and .9% of the
respondents are dissatisfied.

Chart 3.1.21 Respondents towards Saving habits

Table 3.1.22 Respondents towards Satisfaction Level

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Highly satisfied 84 77.8%
2 Satisfied 24 22.2%
3 Neutral 0 0
4 Not satisfied 0 0
4 Highly not Satisfied 0 0
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.22 shows that 77.8% of the respondents are Highly Satisfied,
22.2% of the respondents are Satisfied.

Chart 3.1.22 Respondents towards Satisfaction Level

Table 3.1.23 Respondents towards Standard of Living

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Strongly Agree 57 52.8
2 Agree 51 47.2
3 Disagree 0 0
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.23 shows that 47.2% of the respondents are Agree,52.8% of the
respondents are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.23 Respondents towards Respondents towards Standard of Living

Table 3.1.24 Respondents towards Facilities for employees

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Strongly Disagree 2 1.9%
2 Disagree 3 2.8%
3 Neutral 4 3.7%
4 Agree 52 48.1%
5 Strongly Agree 47 43.5%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.24 shows that 1.9% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree,
2.7% of the respondents are Dis agree satisfied, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and
48.1% of the respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.24 Respondents towards Facilities for employees

Table 3.1.25 Respondents towards Welfare Facilities

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent

1 Strongly Disagree 0 0
2 Disagree 3 2.8%
3 Neutral 7 6.5%
4 Agree 51 47.2%
5 Strongly Agree 47 43.5%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.25 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 47.2% of the
respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.25 Respondents towards Welfare Facilities

Table 3.1.26 Respondents towards Creche Facilities

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 2 1.9%
2 Disagree 5 4.6%
3 Neutral 1 0.9%
4 Agree 54 50.0%
5 Strongly Agree 46 42.6%
Total 108 100.0
Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.26 shows that 1.9% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree,
4.6% of the respondents are Dis agree, 0.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and 50.0% of the
respondents are Agree,42.6% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.26 Respondents towards Creche Facilities

Table 3.1.27 Respondents towards Convenient Working Hours

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 7 6.5%
3 Neutral 1 0.9%
4 Agree 58 53.7%
5 Strongly Agree 42 38.9%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.27 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 6.5%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 0.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of the
respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.27 Respondents towards Convenient Working Hours

Table 3.1.28 Respondents towards Work Schedules are properly Fixed

Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
 1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 3 2.8%
3 Neutral 8 7.4%
4 Agree 48 44.4%
5 Strongly Agree 49 45.4%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.28 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 7.4% of the respondents are Neutral, and 44.4% of the
respondents are Agree,45.4% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.28 Respondents towards Work Schedules are properly Fixed

Table 3.1.29 Respondents towards Sanitation Facilities

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 4 3.7%
3 Neutral 3 2.8%
4 Agree 51 47.2%
5 Strongly Agree 50 46.3%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.29 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 2.8% of the respondents are Neutral, and 47.2% of the
respondents are Agree,46.3% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.29 Respondents towards Sanitation Facilities

Table 3.1.30 Respondents towards Safety Instructions

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 3 2.8%
3 Neutral 5 4.6%
4 Agree 48 44.4%
5 Strongly Agree 52 48.1%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.30 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 4.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 44.4% of the
respondents are Agree,48.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.30 Respondents towards Sanitation Facilities

Table 3.1.31 Respondents towards First Aid Facilities

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 0 0%
3 Neutral 4 3.7%
4 Agree 62 57.4%
5 Strongly Agree 42 38.9%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.31 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 0% of
the respondents are Dis agree, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 57.4% of the
respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.31 Respondents towards First Aid Facilities

Table 3.1.32 Respondents towards Payment Method

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 5 4.6%
3 Neutral 2 1.9%
4 Agree 60 55.6%
5 Strongly Agree 41 38.0%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.32 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 1.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and 55.6% of the
respondents are Agree,38.0% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.32 Respondents towards Payment Method

Table 3.1.33 Respondents towards PF & ESI

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 5 4.6%
3 Neutral 6 5.6%
4 Agree 60 55.6%
5 Strongly Agree 37 34.3%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.33 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 5.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 55.6% of the
respondents are Agree,34.3% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.33 Respondents towards PF & ESI

Table 3.1.34 Respondents towards Job Security

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 4 3.7%
3 Neutral 3 2.8%
4 Agree 59 54.6%
5 Strongly Agree 42 38.9%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.34 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7%
of the respondents are Disagree, 2.8% of the respondents are Neutral, and 54.6% of the
respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.34 Respondents towards Job Security

Table 3.1.35 Respondents towards Medical Benefits

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 5 4.6%
3 Neutral 7 6.5%
4 Agree 57 52.8%
5 Strongly Agree 39 36.1%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.35 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 52.8% of the
respondents are Agree,36.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.35 Respondents towards Medical Benefits

Table 3.1.36 Respondents towards Appraisal Programs

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 6 5.6%
3 Neutral 5 4.6%
4 Agree 58 53.7%
5 Strongly Agree 39 36.1%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.36 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 5.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 4.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of the
respondents are Agree,36.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.36 Respondents towards Appraisal Programs

Table 3.1.37 Respondents towards Career Development

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 6 5.6%
3 Neutral 6 5.6%
4 Agree 49 45.4%
5 Strongly Agree 47 43.5%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.37 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 5.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 5.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 45.4% of the
respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.37 Respondents towards Career Development

Table 3.1.38 Respondents towards Social Integration at Work
Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 5 4.6%
3 Neutral 4 3.7%
4 Agree 54 50.0%
5 Strongly Agree 45 41.7%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.38 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 50.0% of the
respondents are Agree,41.7% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.38 Respondents towards Social Integration at Work

Table 3.1.39 Respondents towards company helps employees fulfilling their personal
aspirations
Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 0 0%
3 Neutral 7 6.5%
4 Agree 58 53.7%
5 Strongly Agree 43 39.8%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.39 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of the
respondents are Agree,39.8% of the responded are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.39 Respondents towards company helps employees fulfilling their personal
aspirations
Table 3.1.40 Respondents towards Work Life balance
Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 18 16.7%
3 Neutral 37 34.7%
4 Agree 53 49.1%
5 Strongly Agree 0 0%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.40 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 16.7% of the
respondents are Dis agree, 34.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 49.1% of the
respondents are Agree.

Chart 3.1.40 Respondents towards Work Life balance

Table 3.1.41 Respondents towards Planning & Decision Making
Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 4 3.7%
3 Neutral 0 0%
4 Agree 53 49.1%
5 Strongly Agree 51 47.2
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.41 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7% of the
respondents are Disagree, 0% of the respondents are Neutral, and 49.1% of the respondents
are Agree,47.2% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.41 Respondents towards Planning & Decision Making

Table 3.1.42 Respondents towards Need of Employees

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 7 6.5%
3 Neutral 12 11.1%
4 Agree 49 45.4%
5 Strongly Agree 40 37%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.42 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 6.5% of the
respondents are Disagree, 11.1% of the respondents are Neutral, and 45.4% of the
respondents are Agree,37% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.42 Respondents towards Need of Employees

Table 3.1.43 Respondents towards any emergency of Employees

 Sno Particulars Frequency Percent
1 Strongly Disagree 0 0%
2 Disagree 8 7.4%
3 Neutral 9 8.3%
4 Agree 47 43.5%
5 Strongly Agree 44 40.7%
Total 108 100.0

Source: Primary Data

From the table 3.1.43 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 7.4% of the
respondents are Disagree, 8.3% of the respondents are Neutral, and 43.5% of the respondents
are Agree,40.7% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.

Chart 3.1.43 Respondents towards any emergency of Employees

3.2 CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS

 Table 3.2.1 To test the relation between Age Group and Safety in the organization
Null Hypothesis

There is no relation between Age Group and safety in the organization.

Alternative Hypothesis

There is relation between Age Group and safety in the organization.

3.2.1.1 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Age of the Respondents * 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%
Respondents opinion towards
Safety Precautions

3.2.1.2 Age Group and Safety in the organization Cross tabulation

Count Age Group and Safety in the organization Total

Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly
Disagree Agree
Age 20 - 25 years 0 4 5 17 24 41
Group 25 - 30 years 0 0 13 120 57 186
30-35 Years 5 0 0 49 50 117
Above 35 0 0 72 58 130
Years
Total 5 4 18 258 189 474

3.2.1.3 Chi-Square Tests

 Value Df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 61.704 12 .000

Likelihood Ratio 62.682 12 .000
Linear-by-Linear .401 .527
Association
N of Valid Cases 108
a. 11 cells (55.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is .35

Inference

It is observed from the table 3.2.2 the calculated value (61.704) is less than table
value and the results are not significant at 5% level. Hence the alternative hypothesis
accepted. From the analysis it is concluded that there is relation between Age Group and
Safety in the organization

Table 3.2.2 To test the relation between Experience and Salary in the organization
Null Hypothesis

There is no relation between years of Experience and Salary in the organization

Alternative Hypothesis

There is relation between years of Experience and Salary in the organization

3.2.2.1 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Experience of the Respondents * 108 100.0% 0 0.0% 108 100.0%
Salary of the Respondents
 3.2.2.2 Experience of the Respondents * Salary of the Respondents Crosstabulation

Count Experience and Salary in the organization Total

Below 15000- 25000- 35000-45000 Above 45000
15000 25000 35000
Experi Below 2 54 19 0 0 0 73
ence Years
Group 2-4 years 0 43 55 10 57 108
4-6 Years 5 0 32 45 50 77
Above 6 0 0 36 42 138 216
Years
Total 54 62 123 97 138 474

3.2.2.3 Chi-Square Tests

Value Df Asymptotic Significance (2-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 7.034E2 12 .042

Likelihood Ratio 687.549 12 .027
Linear-by-Linear 354.560 1 .000
Association
N of Valid Cases 108
a. 6 cells (46.7%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8.32

Inference

It is observed from the table 3.3.2 the calculated value (7.034) is less than table value
and the results are not significant at 5% level. Hence the alternative hypothesis accepted.
From the analysis it is concluded that there is relation between experience and salary in the
organization
 CHAPTER IV

4.1 FINDING

4.1.1 FINDINGS FOR PERCENTAGE ANALYSIS

 From the table 3.1.1 shows that, 10% of the respondents are 20-25 Years,37% of the
respondents are 25-30 years,24% of the respondents are 30-35 years and29 .0% of the
respondents are Above 35 years.
 From the table 3.12 shows that, 53.0% of the respondents are Under Graduate, 47%
of the respondents are Post Graduate.
 From the table 3.1.3 shows that, 53.0% of the respondents are Urban, 47.0% of the
respondents are Rural.
 From the table 3.1.4 shows that, 16.0% of the respondents are below 2 Years, 23.0%
of the respondents are 2-4 Years,16.0% of the respondents are 4-6 years and 45%
respondents are above 6 years.
 From the table 3.1.5 shows that, 12.0% of the respondents are Below 15000,14.0% of
the respondents are Rs15000-25000.24.0% of the respondents are 25000-
35000,19.0% of the respondents are 35000-45000,31.0% of the respondents are
Above 45000.
 From the table 3.16 shows that, 12.0% of the respondents are Below 15000,14.0% of
the respondents are Rs15000-25000.24.0% of the respondents are 25000-
35000,19.0% of the respondents are 35000-45000,31.0% of the respondents are
Above 45000.
 From the table 3.1.7 shows 50% of the respondents are Married, 50% of the
respondents are Unmarried.
 From the table 3.1.8 shows that 37.0%% of the respondents are Joined Family, 63.0%
of the respondents are Nuclear Family.
 From the table 3.1.9 shows that 10.2% of the respondents are HR Team,53.7% of the
respondents are Recruitment Team,14.8% of the respondents are Delivery team,3.7%
of the respondents are Back-office team,10.2% of the respondents are Administration
Team,7.4% of the respondents are IT Team.
 From the table 3.1.10 shows that67.6% of the respondents are Team Leader,3.7% of
the respondents are Project Associate,28.7% of the respondents are Quality Associate.
 From the table 3.1.11 shows that 49.1% of the respondents are 8 Hours,50.9% of the
respondents are 9 Hours.
 From the table 3.1.12 shows that 25.9% of the respondents are Less than 5
kms,37.0% of the respondents are 5-10 kms,13.0% of the respondents are 11-15
kms,24.1 % of the respondents are 16-20 kms.
 From the table 3.1.13 shows that 43.5% of the respondents are by 2-Wheeler, 56.5%
of the respondents are by Company Vehicle.
 From the table 3.1.14 shows that 100.0% of the respondents are Strictly Followed.
 From the table 3.1.15 shows that 100.0%% of the respondents are Maintained by
electronic Device.
 From the table 3.1.16 shows that 48.1% of the respondents are Through Special gift,
51.9% of the respondents are Through Incentives.
 From the table 3.1.17 shows that 26.9% of the respondents are Skill Building, 35.2%
of the respondents are Healthcare Program, 38.0% of the respondents are Training for
New Joiners.
 From the table 3.1.18 shows that 100% of the respondents are 2 Off-days in a week.
 From the table 3.1.19 shows that 31.2% of the respondents are 2-3 Moths, 68% of the
respondents are More than 3 Months.
 From the table 3.1.20 shows that 20.2% of the respondents are Additional benefits,
79.6% of the respondents are No Discrimination.
 From the table 3.1.21 shows that 50.5% of the respondents are Satisfied, 28.8% of the
respondents are Highly satisfied, 19.8% of the respondents are Moderate, and .9% of
the respondents are dissatisfied.
 From the table 3.1.22 shows that 77.8% of the respondents are Highly Satisfied,
22.2% of the respondents are Satisfied.
 From the table 3.1.23 shows that 47.2% of the respondents are Agree, 52.8% of the
respondents are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.24 shows that 1.9% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree,
2.7% of the respondents are Dis agree satisfied, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral,
and 48.1% of the respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.25 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 47.2% of
the respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.26 shows that 1.9% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree,
4.6% of the respondents are Dis agree, 0.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and
50.0% of the respondents are Agree,42.6% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.27 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 6.5%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 0.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of
the respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.28 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 7.4% of the respondents are Neutral, and 44.4% of
the respondents are Agree,45.4% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.29 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 2.8% of the respondents are Neutral, and 47.2% of
the respondents are Agree,46.3% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.30 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 2.8%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 4.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 44.4% of
the respondents are Agree,48.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.31 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 0% of
the respondents are Dis agree, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 57.4% of the
respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.32 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 1.9% of the respondents are Neutral, and 55.6% of
the respondents are Agree,38.0% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.33 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 5.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 55.6% of
the respondents are Agree,34.3% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.34 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 2.8% of the respondents are Neutral, and 54.6% of
the respondents are Agree,38.9% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
  From the table 3.1.35 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 52.8% of
the respondents are Agree,36.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree
 From the table 3.1.36 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 5.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 4.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of
the respondents are Agree,36.1% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.37 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 5.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 5.6% of the respondents are Neutral, and 45.4% of
the respondents are Agree,43.5% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.38 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 3.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 50.0% of
the respondents are Agree,41.7% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.39 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 4.6%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 6.5% of the respondents are Neutral, and 53.7% of
the respondents are Agree,39.8% of the responded are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.40 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 16.7%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 34.7% of the respondents are Neutral, and 49.1% of
the respondents are Agree.
 From the table 3.1.41 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 3.7%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 0% of the respondents are Neutral, and 49.1% of the
respondents are Agree, 47.2% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.42 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 6.5%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 11.1% of the respondents are Neutral, and 45.4% of
the respondents are Agree, 37% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.
 From the table 3.1.43 shows that 0% of the respondents are Strongly Disagree, 7.4%
of the respondents are Dis agree, 8.3% of the respondents are Neutral, and 43.5% of
the respondents are Agree, 40.7% of the respondents are Strongly Agree.

4.1.2 FINDINGS FOR CHI SQUARE ANALYSIS

  There is no relationship between Age and safety Precaution existing in the
organization.
 There is a relationship between years of experience and authentication to participate
in decision making.

4.2 SUGGESTIONS
 The Company should focus on workers’ welfare by providing the basic necessities
such as quality food and hygienic sanitary equipment’s which will give to the workers
psychologically, emotionally and physically fit enough to work.
 The study recommended that an attractive pay scale can be offered and permissible
leave limits can be extended
 The Company should also address the policies to the employee so that they don’t feel
deprived of their rights. Also, the Company should provide emotional support and
guidance when the worker is irregular or not performing well which may caused by
his family situation.
 The organization can be improving Infrastructure facilities. Organization has to
contribute to its positive efforts to make their employee satisfaction

CHAPTER V
5.1 CONCLUSION
In today’s world, Employees are considered as the most important assets of the
organization. An assured good quality of work life not only attracts young and new talent but
also retain the existing experienced talent. In order to have a greater and effective quality of
work life the private companies must fulfill and need to go extra mile in order that the
employee can retained with least effort and can provide the best results to the company. The
success of any organization depends on the efficiency of labour are increasing the efficiency.
The organization promote of Quality of work life in the employees

This study analyzed the Quality of work life of women employees in IT sector with respect to
VBEYOND CORPORATION LIMITED, CHENNAI. Even though IT companies provide the
facilities such as working from home, flexi-time working, cab, training programs, maternity
leaves to their women employees many companies find difficult to sustain the women
employees in the industry.

BIBILIOGRAPHY

Text books:

[1] Prof. T.V. Rao, “Human Resources Development” (Experience, Interventions,

Strategies), 2nd edition, SAGE publications.

[2] T.N. Chhabra, “Human Resource Management” (concepts and issues), 1st edition,
DhanpatRai& co publishers, 2000.

[3] C.R. Kothari, “Research Methodology Methods and Techniques”, 2nd edition, New Age
International (P) Ltd, Publishers, New Delhi, 2007.

[4] V.S.P. Rao, Human Resource Management (Text and Cases), 4th edition, Excel book,
2004, New Delhi.