Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Beams Under Flexure

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 17

Name: Ayush Kr.

Gupta
Roll no. : CE20B021
Behaviour of reinforced concrete beams under flexure

Aim: To study the behaviour of a beam under flexure.

Details of test specimen:

Apparatus used:
● hydraulic pump
● dial gauges
● DEMEC gauge
● LVDTs
● Pellets
NEAT SKETCH OF EXPERIMENTAL SETUP:
Background:

Above figure shows 3 different types of sections which are under reinforced, balanced and
over reinforced sections.
UNDER REINFORCED SECTION:
An under-reinforced beam section refers to a type of reinforced concrete beam section where the
amount of steel reinforcement is insufficient compared to what is necessary for a balanced section.

Under reinforced, steel reaches its yield point before concrete reaches.

OVER REINFORCED SECTION:


Over reinforced beam sections refer to reinforced concrete beam sections where the concrete
reaches its failure strain earlier than the steel reaches its yield strain.

BALANCED SECTION:
In a balanced section, the stresses in the concrete and steel are ideally balanced, leading to both
materials theoretically failing at the same time.
ASSUMPTIONS IN FLEXURE THEORY:
● In a straight beam undergoing bending, the cross-section remains planar, resulting in tensile
stress on one side, compressive stress on the other, and a neutral axis with zero stress.
● The tensile strength of concrete is neglected in flexural strength calculations.
● Concrete is assumed to fail when compressive strain reaches a limiting value.

● The cross-section of a straight beam remains plane when the beam deforms
due to bending. This causes tensile stress on one portion of the
cross-section and compressive stress on the other portion. In between
these portions, there exists the neutral axis which is subjected to zero
stress.
● The value of the young’s modulus is the same in both tension and
compression zone, and the material of the beam is homogeneous and
isotropic, which means that the beam can be modelled as a Bernoulli beam
and that there are no local stress concentrations
● The tensile strength of concrete is neglected in flexural strength calculations
● Concrete is assumed to fail when the compressive strain reaches a limiting
value.
CRACKING MOMENT:

SHEAR FORCE DIAGRAM AND BENDING MOMENT DIAGRAM FOR TWO POINT LOADS
ACTING AT EQUIDISTANT FROM BOTH THE SUPPORTS:
OBSERVATION:
Table – 1: Readings from the DEMEC gauges at various locations –

DEMEC READINGS (IN mm)


LOADS (IN KG) 1 2 3 4 5
0 0.07 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.05
250 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09 0.05
500 0.05 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.06
750 0.04 0.06 0.1 0.1 0.08
1000 0.03 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.14
1500 0.01 0.08 0.15 0.21 0.26
2000 -0.01 0.07 0.18 0.27 0.34
2500 -0.03 0.06 0.22 0.34 0.41
3000 -0.06 0.06 0.25 0.39 0.51
3500 -0.08 0.05 0.28 0.45 0.59
4000 -0.11 0.04 0.3 0.52 0.68

4500 -0.17 0.03 0.33 0.57 0.79

Table 2 - Readings from Dial Gauges


LOAD CELL LVDT 1 (IN MM) LVDT 2 (IN MM) LVDT 3 (IN MM)
0 0.002 0.014 -0.001
250 -0.186 0.21 -0.188
500 -0.405 0.462 -0.409
750 -0.677 0.766 -0.681
1000 -1.18 1.334 -1.151
1500 -2.294 2.556 -2.258
2000 -3.214 3.599 -3.177
2500 -4.253 4.763 -4.241
3000 -5.343 5.98 -5.283
3500 -6.345 7.122 -6.329
4000 -7.54 8.5 -7.619
4500 -9.561 11.398 -10.976

Table 3 – Strain Values at different locations – Under reinforced Beam


Strain (×10^(−6)) )
Load (Kg)
1 2 3 4 5
0 0 0 0 0 0
250 -50 -50 0 50 0
500 -100 0 0 0 50
750 -150 -100 100 100 150
1000 -200 -50 200 300 450
1500 -300 0 350 650 1050
2000 -400 -50 500 950 1450
2500 -500 -100 700 1300 1800
3000 -650 -100 850 1550 2300
3500 -750 -150 1000 1850 2700
4000 -900 -200 1100 2200 3150
4500 -1200 -250 1250 2450 3700
Table 4 - Deflections at different locations – Under reinforced Beam

Observed Deflection (mm) Theoretical Deflection (mm)


Load (Kg)
LVDT 1 LVDT 2 LVDT 3 LVDT 1 LVDT 2 LVDT 3

0 0.002 0.014 -0.001 0 0 0

250 -0.186 0.21 -0.188 0.3741914 0.43032 0.374191

500 -0.405 0.462 -0.409 0.7483829 0.86064 0.748383

750 -0.677 0.766 -0.681 1.1225743 1.29096 1.122574

1000 -1.18 1.334 -1.151 1.4967657 1.721281 1.496766

1500 -2.294 2.556 -2.258 2.2451486 2.581921 2.245149

2000 -3.214 3.599 -3.177 2.9935314 3.442561 2.993531

2500 -4.253 4.763 -4.241 3.7419143 4.303201 3.741914


3000 -5.343 5.98 -5.283 4.4902971 5.163842 4.490297

3500 -6.345 7.122 -6.329 5.23868 6.024482 5.23868

4000 -7.54 8.5 -7.619 5.9870628 6.885122 5.987063

4500 -9.561 11.398 -10.976 6.7354457 7.745763 6.735446


TABLE 5 : LOAD VS CRACK WIDTH (IN DIVISIONS)

LOAD (IN KG) DIVISIONS


0 0
250 0
500 0
750 0
1000 2
1500 3
2000 3
2500 4
3000 6
3500 6
4000 7
4500 8
Sample calculation
TABLE 6: depth of neutral axis, curvature and moment:

Depth of NA
Load (Kg) Moment (Nm) Curvature (Φ)
(mm)
0 0 0 100
250 735.75 0.00025 100
500 1471.5 0.00075 50
750 2207.25 0.0015 150
1000 2943 0.00325 66.66667
1500 4414.5 0.00675 50
2000 5886 0.00925 57.14286
2500 7357.5 0.0115 62.5
3000 8829 0.01475 59.09091
3500 10300.5 0.01725 62.5
4000 11772 0.02025 64.28571
4500 13243.5 0.0245 63.15789
SKETCH OF CRACK PATTERNS:
CONCLUSION & DISCUSSION:

THEORETICAL EXPERIMENTAL
CRACKING LOAD 1286 KG 1000 KG
ULTIMATE LOAD 4501.3 KG 4500 KG

● Theoretical cracking load is higher than experimental and theoretical


ultimate load is almost equal to the experimental.
● Most of the major cracks are flexural cracks that run till the
final level of the neutral axis.
● The little deviation in experimental values from the ideal behaviour is
due to human error.
● Ductile failure is observed. In this type of failure, the steel
yields before the concrete fails during compression. As the
steel yields before the concrete fails, cracks begin to widen
significantly, and deflection is obvious even to the unaided
eye. In real-world buildings, this is the favoured technique
since the warning is adequate before failure occurs.

You might also like