Cep Tentative

TENTATIVE TITLE OF THE PROPOSAL
DESIGN TECHNICAL EVALUATION
Technical Aspects
A. Architectural Plans
1. Check the Slope of Ramp since there is standard slope.
2. Provide Ticketing Booth.
3. Minimize Firewall. As possible low wall only to reduce cost also additional cross air
ventilation.
B. Structural Plans
1. Check Structural calculation since base on experience and assumption, 22 – 32mm
dia. Vertical bars on columns is too much for a 3 Storey Parking Building. This may
jack up your cost. This goes also to all structural members like beams, etc.
2. Provide Depth of excavation for footing. Label of Footing.
Design Plan of Elevated Parking Space using AutoCAD
GROUND FLOOR PLAN
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Jade Alexis Tumaliuan
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
SECOND FLOOR PLAN
THIRD FLOOR PLAN
ELEVATIONS:
FRONT ELEVATION
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
RIGHT-SIDE ELEVATION LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION
REAR ELEVATION
SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN
ROOF BEAM PLAN
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
ROOF FRAMING PLAN

CAPITAL COST
UNIT
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS QTY. UNIT TOTAL
COST
I. EARTHWORKS
300.
1385
A. Excavation cu.m 00 415,500.00
500.
375
B. Gravel cu.m 00 187,500.00
C. 60.
2885
Compaction sq.m 00 173,100.00
D. Soil 60.
1800
Poisoning sq.m 00 108,000.00
Subtotal 884,100.00
Material Cost 884,100.00
Labor Cost 1,768,200.00
Total
2,652,300.00
II. CONCRETE WORKS
A. Column
260.
1174
1 Portland Cement bag/s 00 305,240.00
16mm Ø x 6m Corrugated 365.
46
2 Rebar pc/s 00 16,790.00
25
3 Rebar pc/s 00 3,600.00
400.
66
4 Fine Aggregates (S1) cu.m 00 26,400.00
500.
131
5 Coarse Aggregates cu.m 00 65,500.00
80.
7
6 #16 Gauge Tie Wire kgs. 00 560.00
Subtotal 418,090.00
B. Tie Beam (TB1)
260.
188
36
2 Rebar pc/s 00 13,140.00
52
3 Rebar pc/s 00 7,488.00
400.
11
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
500.
21
80.
7
Subtotal 84,968.00
C. Beam (B1)
260.
375
1 Portland Cement pc/s 00 97,500.00
90
2 Rebar pc/s 00 32,850.00
67
3 Rebar pc/s 00 9,648.00
400.
21
500.
42
80.
15
6 #16 Gauge Tie Wire kgs. 00 1,200.00
Subtotal 170,598.00
D. Beam (CB1)
260.
375
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
3
3 Rebar pc/s 00 432.00
400.
21
500.
42
80.
1
Subtotal 128,872.00
E. Beam (CB2)
260.
29
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
29
500.
57
80.
1
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
Subtotal 49,468.00
E. Beam (CB3)
260.
42
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
21
500.
42
80.
1
Subtotal 42,148.00
E. Beam (CB4)
260.
5
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
3
500.
5
80.
1
Subtotal
6,828.00
E. Beam (CB5)
260.
4
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
2
4 Fine Aggregates (S1) cu.m 00 800.00
500.
4
80.
1
Subtotal
5,668.00
E. Beam (CB6)
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
260.
3
1 Portland Cement bag/s 00 780.00
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
1
500.
3
80.
1
Subtotal
4,508.00
E. Beam (RB1)
260.
35
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
3
500.
35
80.
1
Subtotal 29,628.00
E. Beam (RB2)
260.
4
4
2 Rebar pc/s 00 1,460.00
2
3 Rebar pc/s 00 288.00
400.
1
500.
4
80.
1
Subtotal
5,268.00
F. Slab
260.
180
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
16mm Ø x 6m Corrugated
0
2 Rebar pc/s -
31
2 Rebar pc/s 00 4,464.00
400.
90
500.
1620
80.
2
Subtotal 897,424.00
K. Footing
56. 260.
1 Portland Cement 00 bag/s 00 14,560.00
0
2 Rebar pc/s 00 -
400.
28
500.
56
80.
1
Subtotal 53,840.00
s
v= 180 tw 1.493276
cement 1620
s1 90
coarse 180
0.62
10mm 185.27 114.87
foot
v= 55.2 tw 0.21762
cement 496.8
s1 27.6
coarse 55.2
0.62
10mm 27.00 16.74
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
Sources of Capital Funding
v= 130.438
1173.94
cement 2 ties/ col 68 pcs
s1 65.219 60 pcs
coarse 130.438
16 276 1.58 436.08
92.057
0.62
10 148.48 6
6.86578
tie 9
tb1
v= 20.79
cement 187.11 ties/ b 166.5 pcs
s1 10.395 142.5 pcs
coarse 20.79
16 216 1.58 341.28
10 309 0.62 191.58
tie 6.92718
b1
v= 41.58
cement 374.22 ties/ b 225 pcs
s1 20.79 177 pcs
coarse 41.58
16 540 1.58 853.2
10 402 0.62 249.24
14.3317
tie 2
cb1
v= 41.58
cement 374.22 ties/ b 14.75 pcs
s1 20.79 pcs
coarse 41.58
16 20 1.58 31.6
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
10 14.75 0.62 9.145

0.52968
tie 5
cb2
v= 56.16
s1 28.08 pcs
coarse 56.16
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
cb3
v= 41.58
s1 20.79 pcs
coarse 41.58
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
cb4
v= 4.2
s1 2.1 pcs
coarse 4.2
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456

0.48172
tie 8
cb5
v= 3.15
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
s1 1.575 pcs
coarse 3.15
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
cb6
v= 2.88
s1 1.44 pcs
coarse 2.88
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
RB1
v= 34.56
s1 17.28 pcs
coarse 34.56
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
RB2
v= 3.85
s1 1.925 pcs
coarse 3.85
16 20 1.58 31.6
10 8.8 0.62 5.456
0.48172
tie 8
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
FINANCIALS
Operating Income
To determine the operating income of a three-floor parking lot, you would need to subtract the
operating expenses from the total revenue generated by the parking lot. Operating expenses
may include costs such as rent, utilities, maintenance, staffing, and marketing. By subtracting
the operating expenses from the total revenue, you can calculate the net operating income of
the parking lot.
1st Quarter 2nd 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter On-going

Quarter
Program 110,000,00 200,000 350,000 450,000 500,000
fees 0
Facility hire 89,000 130,000 160,000 200,000 240,000
charges
Equipment 90,000 110,000 145,000 160,000 170,000
rental
Advertising 45,000 57,000 66,000 78,000 87,000

space
within the
proposed
facility
Grants and 24,000 32,0000 38,000 44,000 51,000

donations
Sponsorship 26,000 31,000 38,000 43,000 52,000
.
Operating Expenditure
To calculate the total operating expenditures of a three-floor parking lot, you would need to
add up all the costs associated with operating the parking lot. Subtracting the total operating
expenses from the total revenue generated by the parking lot would provide the net operating
income for the parking lot.
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
Input Sheet
Assumptions
Starting Date 2023
Investment Input Amount(peso) Month
Investment Owner 300,000 1

Investment from Investor 500,000 1
Terms in Monthly
Loan Amount(peso) Month Month Repayment Annual Interest Rate
Loan 1 50,000 1 30 1,895 10%
Loan 2 10,000 1 60 212 10%
Loan 3 20,000 1 60 425 10%
Grow Rate is 5%
Revenue
Assumptions
Price parking Direct Cost Maximum average First Month

Parkings (peso) per Parking occupancy Parking(starting)
Vallet 25 20 1,200 1,100
Car parking 20 15 1,000 900
Financial Forecasts
Break Even
Analysis
Break Even
Analysis Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Fixed Cost 984 1,047 1,111 1,179 1,251

Contribution
Margin 20% 20% 20% 20% 20%
Variable Cost 609,465 617,025 624,585 639,298 663,815
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
Break Even Sales 4,807 5,112 5,425 5,760 6,113

Monthly Fixed
Cost 82 87 93 98 104
Minimum
Monthly Break
even 401 426 452 480 509
Revenue 766,366 775,891 785,417 803,846 834,687
Total Visitors 36,208 36,662 37,115 37,939 39,454

ARPV 21 21 21 21 21
Break Even
Visitors 227 242 256 272 289
Cash Flow Considerations
Cash Flow for Parking Lot Excel Financial Model
Sensitivity Analysis
Total Compensation Cost/Fund Requirement A total estimated compensation cost for the
road project is P 21,749,000.00 for the PAFS whose land holdings are marginally affected. Total
compensation cost including 2.5% management cost and 10 a contingency. The 6% capital gains
tax and 1% documentary tax is P 1,274,000.00
Unit costs for estimating costs

Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
Structures that are lost will be compensated for in cash, at replacement cost without depreciation
and after taking into account salvageable materials. For each structure, the replacement costs for
building supplies, labor, and material hauling will be computed using the actual dimensions of
the affected area. The cost of the materials will be determined by the area's current market price.
Therefore, during the IAPRAP's implementation period, the market rates used for compensation
assessment will still be in effect. However, in the event of unanticipated delays longer than 12
months. Rates for buildings and fixed assets will be examined and modified as necessary.
SUSTAINABILITY
Economic
To be economically sustainable, the parking lot must generate enough revenue to cover
its operating expenses and provide a reasonable return on investment. This can be achieved
through effective pricing strategies, maximizing capacity utilization, and minimizing operating
costs.
Environmental
The environmental sustainability of a parking lot can be evaluated based on its

impact on the environment. A sustainable parking lot should be designed and operated with
the environment in mind. This can include features such as energy-efficient lighting, stormwater
management, and use of sustainable building materials. Additionally, promoting sustainable
transportation options such as carpooling, public transit, and biking can reduce the
environmental impact of the parking lot.
Social
Social sustainability of a parking lot involves meeting the needs of its customers
while contributing to the local community. Providing accessible and safe parking options for
customers is important, as well as offering amenities such as EV charging stations and bike
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
racks. Additionally, the parking lot can contribute to the local community by supporting local
businesses and participating in community events.
Overall, the sustainability of a three-floor parking lot will depend on its ability to balance
economic, social, and environmental factors. By incorporating sustainable practices into the
design and operation of the parking lot, it can contribute to a more sustainable future while
also being economically viable and meeting the needs of its customers.
REVISIT
Going to the project's location to identify potential issues and their solutions is a great
proactive step towards ensuring the success of your project. By physically visiting the site, you
can get a better understanding of the environmental, logistical, and practical aspects of the
project, and this can help you anticipate and address any potential issues that may arise during
the project's lifecycle.
During your site visit, you may want to do a walkthrough of the area, meet with local
stakeholders, and consult with any relevant experts in the field. This can help you identify any
potential obstacles or challenges, such as regulatory requirements, safety hazards, or resource
constraints. By identifying these issues early on, you can develop a plan to mitigate them before
they become major roadblocks to the project's success.
Once you have identified potential issues, you can start developing solutions to address them.
This may involve modifying your project plan, allocating additional resources, or changing your
approach to the project. By taking a proactive approach to identifying and addressing potential
issues, you can improve the chances of your project being completed on time, within budget,
and to the satisfaction of all stakeholders.
RECOMMENDATION
The researchers' parking analysis demonstrates the importance of raised parking spaces in
regulating traffic congestion around the city. Certainly, the implementation of this project will
result in a significant reduction in traffic congestion across the city of Tuguegarao. Every
response supplied information needed to fill out the components and variables needed to
demonstrate the need for implementing this project proposal along the city of Tuguegarao. We
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben
expect that this project will serve as a solution to numerous traffic congestion issues and act as a
model for the construction of future elevated vehicle parking spaces.
For perspective modeling, the architectural model was produced using AutoCAD and SketchUp.
The structure itself is made up of three functioning stories for parking vehicles. The usage of a
ramp was proposed to enable flexible connections for each floor. To ensure that this project
fulfills its intended purpose, a maintenance fee must be collected from all vehicles parked on this
property. The collected fees will be used to help with any future issues that may arise on the
building. Based on societal aspects, it will also aid in the economy and security. The existing
building management will play a vital role in the building's life, although there may still be
certain issues that need to be addressed. For the final verdict, this project will concentrate on
upgrading Tuguegarao's parking system so that it is ideally adapted to each individual's lifestyle.
Ema Mallannao
Michael Unday
Angelica Gammaru
Julien Keith Sabben

Cep Tentative

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cep Tentative

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cep Tentative

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

TENTATIVE TITLE OF THE PROPOSAL

DESIGN TECHNICAL EVALUATION

Design Plan of Elevated Parking Space using AutoCAD

GROUND FLOOR PLAN

SECOND FLOOR PLAN

THIRD FLOOR PLAN

RIGHT-SIDE ELEVATION LEFT-SIDE ELEVATION

SECOND FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

THIRD FLOOR FRAMING PLAN

ROOF BEAM PLAN

ROOF FRAMING PLAN

Sources of Capital Funding

10 14.75 0.62 9.145

10 8.8 0.62 5.456

1st Quarter 2nd 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter On-going

Advertising 45,000 57,000 66,000 78,000 87,000

Grants and 24,000 32,0000 38,000 44,000 51,000

Sponsorship 26,000 31,000 38,000 43,000 52,000

Investment Input Amount(peso) Month

Investment Owner 300,000 1

Price parking Direct Cost Maximum average First Month

Fixed Cost 984 1,047 1,111 1,179 1,251

Break Even Sales 4,807 5,112 5,425 5,760 6,113

Total Visitors 36,208 36,662 37,115 37,939 39,454

Cash Flow Considerations

Cash Flow for Parking Lot Excel Financial Model

Unit costs for estimating costs

The environmental sustainability of a parking lot can be evaluated based on its

You might also like