Group 14 Beniga

CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY i
TITLE PAGE
DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDATION OF A WEB-BASED
WORKSHOP MANUAL FOR CARBURETED HONDA MOTORCYCLES
A THESIS MANUSCRIPT SUBMITTED TO

THE FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY
AND TEACHER EDUCATION (CITTE)
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY CABADBARAN CITY
CABADBARAN CITY
IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

IN BACHELOR OF SCIENCE AND INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY MAJOR IN
AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY
EDZIL L. DURANGO
DALE ALEXAN N. BENIGA
SOPHIA ROSE DUMADAG
JEROLD S. MARINO
MARCH 2022
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY ii
APPROVAL SHEET
Just leave blank the I’ll be the one to print this page
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
With grateful hearts, the researchers would like to extend their profound
appreciation to the following who have helped make this study possible:
To Mr. Joseph S. Yatan for patiently editing, correcting and giving
valuable suggestions which enriched the manuscript;
To the family and friends of the researchers for the prayers, moral and
financial support, encouragement, steadfast love and understanding which serve
as an inspiration for the researchers to continue and finish this research
endeavor; and
Above all, to the Almighty God, for the source of life and knowledge, for
giving the researchers wisdom and patience to tenaciously continue and finish
this undertaking.
To them, we give our most sincere gratitude.

CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY iv
DEDICATION
This work is wholeheartedly dedicated to:
Our parents, sisters, brothers, and friends
whose ever-loving care, moral support and
encouragement have given us more inspiration than
what we have expected.
This piece of work is lovingly and gratefully
dedicated most of all to the Almighty God,
the source of all that we have.
Edzil
Dale Alexan
Sophia Rose
Jerold
NAME1 Title
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY v
NAME2
Bachelor of Technical Vocational
Teacher Education
Major in
ABSTRACT
This study focuses only on Honda carbureted motorcycles and this web-
based workshop manual will be accessible through the internet, where you can
search for your motorcycle model guide to help you work on your own
motorcycle (exclusively carbureted Honda motorcycles only). This study titled
“Development and Validation of a Web-Based Workshop Manual for Carbureted
Honda Motorcycles” can help automotive students, mechanics experts and
instructors, and motorcycle owners be productive during this pandemic in terms
of learning how to access the online web-based workshop manual and use it in
working on their own motorcycles. Most people in this time of modernization use
technology because of the stay-at-home policy mandated by the government,
that going to the school and city libraries were restricted. Thus, the researchers
chose this study to know how powerful technology is in this generation. Instead
of browsing social media platforms, motorcycle owners and automotive students
can go to the website and obtain information that can add to their knowledge.
This study was conducted in Cabadbaran City. Convenience sampling
was used in this study wherein the respondents are professionals in the field of
mechanics. All the data gathered was coded and sorted out to be analyzed.
There were 20 professionals as respondents who rated the web-based manual.
The results showed a total mean of 3.53 in the Instructional Manual Evaluation
Checklist (IMEC), with a descriptive interpretation of High Evidence as based on
the scale. The results in Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment showed a
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY vi
total mean of 3.35 and a descriptive interpretation of High Evidence based on
the scale.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE.....................................................................................................................
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY vii
APPROVAL SHEET........................................................................................................
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.................................................................................................
DEDICATION..................................................................................................................
ABSTRACT.....................................................................................................................
TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................
LIST OF TABLES...........................................................................................................
LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................
CHAPTER 1.....................................................................................................................
THE PROBLEM...............................................................................................................
Background of the Study..............................................................................................
Conceptual Framework................................................................................................
Research Paradigm......................................................................................................
Objectives of the Problem............................................................................................
Significance of the Study..............................................................................................
Scope and Delimitation of the Study............................................................................
Review of Related Literature and Studies....................................................................
Definition of Terms.......................................................................................................
CHAPTER 2.....................................................................................................................
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY........................................................................................
Research Design..........................................................................................................
Locale of the Study.......................................................................................................
Respondents of the Study............................................................................................
Sampling Procedure...................................................................................................
Research Instruments................................................................................................
Instructional Material Development............................................................................

CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY viii
Data Gathering...........................................................................................................
Statistical Treatment of Data......................................................................................
CHAPTER 3...................................................................................................................
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS....................................................................................
CHAPTER 4...................................................................................................................
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................
Summary of findings...................................................................................................
Conclusions................................................................................................................
Recommendations......................................................................................................
REFERENCES...............................................................................................................
APPENDICES................................................................................................................
CURRICULUM VITAE 1................................................................................................
LIST OF TABLES
Table Description Page
1 Scale for Instructional Materials Evaluation 13

Checklist (IMEC)
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY ix
2 Scale for Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) 17

Assessment Result
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Description Page
1 Research Paradigm 2
2 Locale of the Study 9
3 Content 13
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY x
4 Organization and Structure 14
5 Support to Learning 15
6 Functional Suitability 17
7 Performance Effeciency 18
8 Compatibility 19
9 Usability 20
10 Reliability 22
11 Security 23
12 Maintainability 24
13 Portability 26
CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY 1
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM
Background of the Study
A workshop manual is a detailed description of how to repair a vehicle,
how to dismantle, test and rebuild components. Whether you want to diagnose
an error in your vehicle system, perform some maintenance work on your own,
or just want to understand the functions of your vehicle, a workshop manual can
come as a priceless source of required information. Simply put, it is a manual
that contains a detailed explanation of how to uninstall, repair, test and reinstall
certain components of your vehicle. Previously, a workshop manual used to be a
thin booklet that you often received with your vehicle purchase. But now, they
can also be given to you in the form of a DVD, which you can read on a PC or
laptop. PDF files of the manual are also available online, which you can
download as per the make and model of your vehicle.
Our web-based workshop manual can help the carbureted Honda
motorcycle owners because we covered only the carbureted engines of Honda
as it is common and easy to repair. This web-based workshop manual will help
the searchers of the website as they repair their motorcycles since the workshop
manual of their motorcycles are easily accessible. This web-based manual is
user- friendly and accessible in any area with internet connection.
We chose this topic to help ourselves, our fellow students, and drivers
learn how to access the online web-based workshop manual and use it to
become productive during this pandemic.

Conceptual Framework
This study is all about the web-based workshop manual for carbureted
Honda motorcycles only. This web-based workshop manual will be accessible
through the internet by searching the model manual to be a guide and aid in
working on the motorcycle (exclusively carbureted Honda motorcycles only).
Project Paradigm
Planning
Gathering of information for the workshop manual of the carburetor Honda
motorcycles
Making of the papers of the study
Create website and sort all the workshop manuals
Testing and Validation
Develop the Project final output
Figure 1. Research Paradigm
Project Objectives
The aim of this study is to:

1. Design a web-based workshop manual for common
carbureted Honda motorcycles;
2. Validate a complete fact or information on this web-based
workshop manual; and
3. Have the website be rated by professionals.
Significance of the Study
This study will be beneficial to the following:
Students - to gain more knowledge on how to repair a motorcycle.
Drivers – to gain more idea on repairing.
Technicians - to recall the past knowledge in repairing Honda carbureted
motorcycles.
Schools – for easier access of the motorcycle manual for they no longer
need to visit libraries, as long as they have internet connection.
Administration – if there is a problem in finding a solution about Honda
motorcycle, they can refer to researcher’s created website about the web-based
workshop manual on Honda motorcycle.
Scope and Delimitation of the Study
This study focused on the web-based workshop manual on carbureted
Honda motorcycles only, which is commonly used in Cabadbaran City. This web-
based manual can be explored on the internet. This study was conducted
particularly on the users of Honda motorcycles within Cabadbaran City, Agusan
Del Norte.
Review of Related Literature and Studies
According to Kristiawan (2018), the public motorcycle workshop standard
has services such as spark plug check, carburetor cleaning, air filter cleaning,
replacement of broken motor spare parts, patching of leaking tires, and repair of
motorcycles that have small to severe problems.
Text instructions are among the most widely used media for learning and
teaching. Hence, to create assistance systems that are capable of supporting
humans autonomously in new tasks, it would be immensely productive if
machines were enabled to extract task knowledge from such text instructions.
This paper, therefore, is focused on information extraction (IE) from the
instructional text in repair manuals. This brings with it the multiple challenges of
information extraction from the situated and technical language in relatively long
and often complex instructions. To tackle these challenges, a semi-structured
dataset of repair manuals was introduced. The dataset is annotated in a large
category of devices, with information considered to be most valuable for an
automated repair assistant, including the required tools and the disassembled
parts at each step of the repair progress (Myfixit, 2020).
According to Yang and colleagues’ (2018) study, increasing numbers of
organizations have set up material on their web portals as a way of providing
users with information about their products or services. The study developed and
validated an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of such
portals. Based upon conceptual models in the areas of IS and technology
adoption, and using responses from 1992 users, the study validated a five-
dimension service quality instrument involving usability, usefulness of content,
adequacy of information, accessibility, and interaction. This scale provides a

useful instrument for researchers who wish to measure the service quality of
Web portals and for portal managers who want to improve their service
performance.
We owe the development of methods and techniques of distance
education primarily to technological progress, global trends and financial support
from the European Union. In the recent years, we have been observing a boom
in the offer of e-learning training. Online access to materials, trainers in the
“reach of a computer mouse”, learning in a convenient place and time, savings
related to travels for training, reduction of downtime related to participation in
training – these are the most commonly accented benefits of e-learning training.
Training is not only lectures, workshops or coaching. It is also a slowly
growing, though consistently Web Based Training market.
It would be an illusion to say that e-learning has no flaws. Of course, it
has quite a lot – but they do not dominate its advantages. In addition, the
advantages and disadvantages of this teaching method should always be
considered in a specific case, not detached from specific people and specific
needs.
The issues that in most cases can be considered as defects include
limiting people-to-people contacts. Direct contacts are very important and no
intermediate form can replace personal contact. The cost of developing a
specific course is greater than in the traditional method because in addition to
basic content it is also good to prepare the right graphics, hire lectors, use the
films, and to effectively participate in WBT, an employee should develop an
adequate motivation to learn. Some students or employees have a big problem

with self-preparation or self-discipline. Among the less beneficial aspects of e-
learning, there is also the issue of problems with copyright protection. (Kramer,
2019)
According to Amadioha (2009) instructional materials are said to be
synonymous with what we call “teaching aids”. Instructional materials are
constituted alternative channels of communication, which a teacher can use to
convey more vividly instructional information to learners. They represent a range
of materials which can be used to extend the range of vicarious experience of
learners in a teaching-learning situation.
The use of e-learning is becoming the global issue now. In an educational
field, there are many institutions that are already using it. The study's primary
goal was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of developing e-learning
instructional materials based on blended learning in an audio/radio media
development course. The problem is rooted in the students' previous experience
with developing audio/radio medium manuscripts.
The importance of instructional materials in teaching and learning cannot
be underestimated. A lot has been written to show the indispensable role of
materials in curricular implementation. Instructional materials make learning
more interesting, practical, realistic, and appealing. They also enable both the
teachers and students to participate actively and effectively in lesson sessions.
Nowadays, with the technology has been improving, there are a lot of
media and online platforms that can be used bot by students and teachers. One
of them is Google Site. Site is a Google service that allows users to easily and
freely create a website equipped with various functions, such as adding images,
videos, links, and other documents (Arumdani et al., 2018).
Definition of Terms
Carbureted/Carburetor. This is a device that mixes air and fuel for
internal combustion engines in the proper air–fuel ratio for combustion.
Web-based. This refers to a software you use over the internet with a
web browser.
Workshop Manual. This is a detailed description of how to repair a
vehicle, how to dismantle, test and rebuild components.
Design. This is the process of imagining and planning the creation of
objects, systems, buildings, vehicles, etc. It is about creating solutions for
people.
Development. This is a process that creates growth, progress, positive
change or the addition of physical, economic, environmental, social and
demographic components.
Validation. It is an act or process of making something officially or legally
acceptable or approved
CHAPTER 2
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Project Design
A qualitative project design was used in this study in order to record the
usability and accessibility of our web-based workshop manual for carbureted
Honda motorcycles.
Locale of the Study
The study was conducted in Cabadbaran City, Agusan del Norte. This
place was selected for knowing the efficiency of the said study among students.
Figure 2. Locale of the study
Respondents of the Study
The respondents were all motorcycle owners, automotive students, and
motorcycle mechanics.
Sampling Procedure
Statistical sampling was used in this study, wherein the researchers
selected their respondents by approaching available students, drivers, or
professionals who have the capability to repair a Honda carbureted motorcycle.
The selected respondents are from Cabadbaran City, Agusan del Norte.
First, the researchers asked the target respondents to visit and navigate
the website, then rate it using a Google Form created by the researchers.
Research Instruments
In this study, Google Site survey questionnaires were utilized. Because of
the current Covid-19 pandemic, online survey questionnaires were utilized to
avoid physical contact. The researchers extracted ideas based on established
facts in the literature study to develop the instruments.
The questionnaire was composed of three sections. The first section
focused on personal information of the respondents that includes email address,
name, age, gender and civil status. The second section consists of 10 items
involving the usability of the web-based workshop manual and is coded in 5
keys. These include Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly
Disagree.
Survey Questionnaire link below.
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/
18qYMhLBMR02LEuEA2aKlHJRX7mbK2U9B8aAghBv63uI/edit?usp=drive_web
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/
15dYDQgoPh3CKkvKAfwEhASsbQh2GYm7SXn_Qp14vVYs/edit
Project Development
This study was carried out as descriptive research. This study is intended
to collect data regarding the development and validation of web-based workshop
manual for Honda carbureted motorcycles to provide a new learning method and
study for the Automotive students. This study was aimed to identify the project
objectives and goals. This study was also about how to repair your motorcycle
on your own.
Data Gathering
The researchers first sought authorization from the research adviser
before approaching the respondents using an online process to collect the
necessary data.
Treatment of Data
This study involves descriptive rule analysis, which analyzes numerical

values obtained from the sample to give meaning to the data collected from the
survey.
CHAPTER 3
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
This section presents the summarized data of the Instructional Materials
Evaluation Checklist (IMEC) and Product Quality of our site named Honda
Carbureted Engine Service Manual. The professionals ratee it with honesty
and respect to the assessment of responses from this site. The responses or
results of the test for significant differences of these ratings were analyzed and
tabulated.
There were 20 professionals who rated our site. Below is the results of
our Instructional Materials and the Product Quality of our site named Honda
Carbureted Engine Service Manual.

We used the formula below to compute the mean and standard deviation
for the results of the survey. The total mean was calculated by adding all of the
questions together, then dividing the sum by the number of questions.
To get the total standard deviation, the mean value was calculated by
summing all the data points and dividing by the number of data points. The
variance for each data point was calculated by subtracting the mean from the
value of the data point. After that, each of the resulting values was squared, and
the results were added together. The result was then divided by the number of
data points less than one. The square root of the variance—results from no. 2—
was then used to find the standard deviation.
Rating scale of the bracket below

Table 1. Scale for Instructional Materials Evaluation Checklist (IMEC)
Scale
4 3.26 High Evidence
3.25 2.51 Enough Evidence
2.5 1.76 Little Evidence
1.75 1 No Evidence
Table 1 illustrates that the First and Second row is the score scale of the
questionnaire result, and the Third row is the interpretation of the score obtained
from the questionnaire.
Instructional Manual Evaluation Checklist (IMEC) Results

It shows the results of our Instructional Manual evaluated by the professionals
Figure 3. CONTENT
Figure 3 indicates that in the Parameters for Content, question number,
which is for “Comments and Suggestions” obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an
interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 2, which is for “Is the content
current or up to date, relevant, complete, and accurate?”, obtained a total mean
of 3.40 and an interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 3, “Does the
level of difficulty of content appropriate for the target end-user in terms of age,
abilities, and time/period for teaching?”, obtained a total mean of 3.55 and an
interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 4, which is for “Does the
content involve connections to other disciplines and to real-life situations or the
socio-cultural environment of students to promote deeper meaning of concepts?”
obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of High Evidence. Question
number 5, which is for “Is IM free of gender, social and cultural biases?”,
obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of High Evidence. And lastly,
question number 6 which is for “Are the ideas expressed in unifying themes?”,
obtained a total mean of 3.50 and an interpretation of High Evidence.

Figure 4. ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE
Figure 4 indicates the Parameters of Organization and Structure. The
results show that in question number 1, “Is the material easy for students to use
and understand?”, the total mean obtained was 3.85 and an interpretation of
High Evidence. Question number 2, “Are instructions/directions in the IM clear
and concise?”, obtained a total mean of 3.75 and an interpretation of High
Evidence. Question number 3, “Are lesson objectives /outcomes clear and
appropriate?”, obtained a total mean of 3.60 and an interpretation of High
Evidence. Question number 4, which is for “Is the layout/format, narrative and
visuals of IM interesting and appealing?” obtained a total mean of 3.60 and an
interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 5, which is for “Is IM free of
gender, social and cultural biases Are the components of IM logically organized,
unified and consistent?”, obtained a total mean of 3.50 and an interpretation of
High Evidence. And lastly, question number 6 which is for “Does the IM provide
opportunities for students to use ICT?”, obtained a total mean of 3.65 and an
interpretation of High Evidence.

Figure 5. SUPPORT TO LEARNING
Figure 5 indicates that in the Parameters of Organization and Structure
question number 1, “Does IM promote collaborative learning?”, obtained a total
mean of 3.80 and an interpretation High Evidence. Question number 2, “Are the
learning tasks motivating and engaging to students?”, obtained a total mean of
3.65 and an interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 3, “Does the
material involve varied teaching strategies?”, obtained a total mean of 3.45 and
an interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 4, “Are assessments of
learning appropriate to achieve the intended learning outcome?”, obtained a total
mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 5, “Are
rubrics to assess learning provided?”, obtained a total mean of 3.45 and an
interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 6, “Does the material present
opportunities for task –based learning?”, obtained a total mean of 3.and an

interpretation of High Evidence. Question number 7, “Does the material support
self-directed learning?”, obtained a total mean of 3.60 and an interpretation High
Evidence. Question number 8, “Does the IM promote critical thinking, creativity,
and problem-solving skills of students?”, obtained a total mean of 3.70 and an
interpretation of High Evidence. And lastly, question number 9, “Is the IM free
from any form of plagiarism?”, obtained a total mean of 3.10 and an
interpretation of Enough Evidence.
Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment Result
Product Quality is the collection of all the features and characteristics of a
product that contribute to its ability to meet the customer needs and
requirements. It is the ability of the product to fulfill what the end user wants and
perceives as valuable.
Table 2. Scale for Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment Result
Scale
4 3.26 Always
3.25 2.51 Frequently
2.5 1.76 Seldom
1.75 1 Not at all
Table 2 shows that the First and Second row is the score scale of the
questionnaire result, and the Third row is the interpretation of the score obtained
in the questionnaire.
Figure 6. FUNCTIONAL SUITABILITY
This characteristic represents the degree to which a product or system
provides functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under
specified conditions. This characteristic is composed of the following sub-
characteristics: Functional Completeness, Functional Correctness, and
Functional Appropriateness.
Figure 6 indicates that in the Parameters of Functional Suitability, Functional
Completeness which pertains to the degree to which the set of functions covers
all the specified tasks and user objectives, obtained a total mean of 3.65 and an
interpretation of Always. Functional Correctness, which pertains to the degree to
which a product or system provides the correct results with the needed degree of
precision, obtained a total mean of 3.25 and an interpretation of Always. And
Functional Appropriateness, which pertains to the degree to which the functions
facilitate the accomplishment of specified tasks and objectives, obtained a total
mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of Always.

Figure 7. PERFORMANCE EFFICIENCY
This characteristic represents the performance relative to the amount of
resources used under stated conditions. This characteristic is composed of the
following sub-characteristics: Time Behavior, Resource Utilization, and Capacity.
Figure 7 indicates that in the Parameters of Performance Efficiency, Time
Behavior, which refers to the degree to which the response and processing times
and throughput rates of a product or system, when performing its functions, meet
requirements, obtained a total mean of 3.20 and an interpretation of Always.
Resource Utilization, which refers to the degree to which the amounts and types
of resources used by a product or system, when performing its functions, meet
requirements, obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of Always. And
as for Capacity, which refers to the degree to which the maximum limits of a
product or system parameter meet requirements, it obtained a total mean of 3.10

and an interpretation of Always.
Figure 8. COMPATIBILITY
This pertains to the degree to which a product, system or component can
exchange information with other products, systems or components, and/or
perform its required functions, while sharing the same hardware or software
environment. This characteristic is composed of the following sub-
characteristics: Co-existence and Interoperability.
Figure 8 indicates that in the Parameters of Compatibility, Co-existence,
which pertains to the degree to which a product can perform its required
functions efficiently while sharing a common environment and resources with
other products, without detrimental impact on any other product, obtained a total
mean of 3.35 and an interpretation of Always. Interoperability, which pertains to
the degree to which two or more systems, products or components can
exchange information and use the information that has been exchanged,
obtained a total mean of 3.50 and an interpretation of Always.
Figure 9. USABILITY
This characteristic pertains to the degree to which a product or system
can be used by specified users to achieve specific goals with effectiveness,
efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use. This characteristic is
composed of the following sub-characteristics below:
Figure 9 indicates that in the Parameters of Usability, question number 1,
“Appropriateness recognizability: Degree to which users can recognize whether
a product or system is appropriate for their needs”, obtained a total mean of 3.55
in and an interpretation of Always; question number 2, “Learnability: Degree to

which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve specified
goals of learning to use the product or system with effectiveness, efficiency,
freedom from risk and satisfaction in a specified context of use”, obtained a total
mean of 3.25 and an interpretation of Always; question number 3, “Operability:
Degree to which a product or system has attributes that make it easy to operate
and control”, obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of Always; then
question number 4, “User error protection: Degree to which a system protects
users against making errors”, obtained a total mean of 3.40 and an interpretation
of Always; question number 5, “User interface aesthetics: Degree to which a
user interface enables pleasing and satisfying interaction for the user”, obtained
a total mean of 3.35 and an interpretation of Always; and lastly, question number
6, “Accessibility: Degree to which a product or system can be used by people
with the widest range of characteristics and capabilities to achieve a specified
goal in a specified context of use”, obtained a total mean of 3.30 and an
interpretation of Always.
Figure 10. RELIABILITY
This characteristic pertains to the degree to which a system, product or
component performs specific functions under specified conditions for a specified
period of time. This characteristic is composed of the following sub-
characteristics below:
Figure 10 indicates that in the Parameters of Reliability, question number
1, “Maturity: Degree to which a system, product or component meets needs for
reliability under normal operation”, obtained a total mean of 3.65 and an
interpretation of Always; question number 2, “Availability: Degree to which a
system, product or component is operational and accessible when required for
use”, obtained a total mean of 3.25 and an interpretation of Always; then
question number 3, “Fault tolerance: Degree to which a system, product or
component operates as intended despite the presence of hardware or software
faults”, obtained a total mean of 3.50 and an interpretation of Always; and

question number 4, “Recoverability: Degree to which, in the event of an
interruption or a failure, a product or system can recover the data directly
affected and re-establish the desired state of the system”, obtained a total mean
of 3.30 and an interpretation of Always.
Figure 11. SECURITY
This characteristic pertains to the degree to which a product or system
protects information and data so that persons or other products or systems have
the degree of data access appropriate to their types and levels of authorization.
This characteristic is composed of the following sub-characteristics below:
Figure 11 indicates that in the Parameters of Security, question number 1,
“Confidentiality: Degree to which a product or system ensures that data are
accessible only to those authorized to have access”, obtained a total mean of
3.50 and an interpretation of Always; question number 2, “Integrity: Degree to
which a system, product or component prevents unauthorized access to, or
modification of, computer programs or data”, obtained a total mean is 3.15 and
an interpretation of Always; question number 3, “Non-repudiation: Degree to
which actions or events can be proven to have taken place, so that the events or
actions cannot be repudiated later”, obtained a total mean of 3.45 and an
interpretation of Always; then question number 4, “Accountability: Degree to
which the actions of an entity can be traced uniquely to the entity”, obtained a
total mean of 3.30 and an interpretation of Always; and lastly, question number
5, “Authenticity: Degree to which the identity of a subject or resource can be
proved to be the one claimed”, obtained a total mean of 3.20 and an
Figure 12. MAINTAINABILITY
This characteristic represents the degree of effectiveness and efficiency
with which a product or system can be modified to improve it, correct it or adapt
it to changes in environment, and in requirements. This characteristic is
composed of the following sub-characteristics below:
Figure 12 indicates that in the Parameters of Maintainability, question
number 1, “Modularity: Degree to which a system or computer program is
composed of discrete components such that a change to one component has
minimal impact on other components”, obtained a total mean of 3.45 and an
interpretation of Always; question number 2, “Reusability: Degree to which an
asset can be used in more than one system, or in building other assets”,
obtained a total mean of 3.25 and an interpretation of Always; question number
3, “Analyzability: Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which it is possible
to assess the impact on a product or system of an intended change to one or
more of its parts, or to diagnose a product for deficiencies or causes of failures,
or to identify parts to be modified”, obtained a total mean of 3.35 and an
interpretation of Always; then question number 4, “Modifiability: Degree to which
a product or system can be effectively and efficiently modified without
introducing defects or degrading existing product quality”, obtained a total mean
of 3.45 and an interpretation of Always; and question number 5, “Testability:
Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which test criteria can be established
for a system, product or component and tests can be performed to determine
whether those criteria have been met”, obtained a total mean of 3.25 and an
Figure 13. PORTABILITY
This characteristic represents the degree of effectiveness and efficiency
with which a system, product or component can be transferred from one
hardware, software or other operational or usage environment to another. This
characteristic is composed of the following sub-characteristics: Adaptability,
Installability, and Replaceability.
Figure 13 indicates that in the Parameters of Portability, question number
1, “Adaptability: Degree to which a product or system can effectively and
efficiently be adapted for different or evolving hardware, software or other
operational or usage environments”, obtained a total mean of 3.60 and an
interpretation of Always; question number 2, “Installability: Degree of
effectiveness and efficiency with which a product or system can be successfully
installed and/or uninstalled in a specified environment”, obtained a total mean is
3.10 and an interpretation of Always; and lastly, question number 3,
“Replaceability: Degree to which a product can replace another specified

software product for the same purpose in the same environment”, obtained a
total mean of 3.35 and an interpretation of Always.

CHAPTER 4
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Summary of findings
This presents the summary of the results for the study titled “Development
and Content Validation of a Web-based Workshop Manual for Carbureted Honda
Motorcycles”, which was conducted in Cabadbaran City. There were 20
professionals who participated as respondents of this study, to rate our web-
based manual. The results showed that in the Instructional Manual Evaluation
Checklist (IMEC), the total mean obtained was 3.53, and in the scale the
professionals rated with an interpretation of High Evidence. The results also
showed that in the Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment, the total
mean obtained was 3.35, and in the scale the professionals rated with an
interpretation of High Evidence.
Conclusions
Based on the results in the Instructional Manual Evaluation Checklist
(IMEC), question number 9 that pertains to “Support to Learning” obtained the
lowest mean of 3.10, which corresponds to the interpretation of Enough
Evidence.
Also, in Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment, the lowest
means are the following: a mean of 3.25 for question number 2 in Functional
Suitability characteristic; a mean of 3.20 in question number 3 for Performance
Efficiency characteristic; a mean of 3.15 in question number 2 for Usability
characteristic; a mean of 3.25 in question number 2 for Reliability characteristic;
a mean of 3.15 in question number 2 and 3.20 in question number 5 in Security
characteristic; a mean of 3.25 in question number 2 and 3.25 in question number

5 for Maintainability characteristic; and lastly, a mean of 3.10 in question
number 2 in Portability characteristics.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study, the following are the recommendations
drawn by the researchers and some are comments from the respondents:
1. To improve the site and produce more Honda carbureted workshop
manuals;
2. To improve by bringing it offline so the mechanics or students can
use the site even when not connected to the internet; and
3. To further improve it by designing a mobile application to promote
a user-friendly environment.
REFERENCES
Amadioha, (2009). The importance of instructional materials in our schools an

overview.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322368912
Arumdani, I. M., Wasito, B., & Sabandi, M. (2018). Pengaruh Pemanfaatan Situs
Google.Sebagai Sumber Belajar dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Prestasi
Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 3
Surakarta. BISE: Jurnal Pendidikan Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 4(2), 1–17.
Djusar, S., Fajrizal, & Asril, E. (2021). Peningkatan Kemampuan Siswa Sman 16
Pekanbaru Dalam Pemanfaatan Situs Google Untuk Pembelajaran. J
COSCIS : Journal of Computer Science Community Service, 1(1), 31–36.
https://doi.org/10.31849/jcoscis.v1i1.5686
KRAMER, (2019) - Trademarks, Copyrights and Unfair Competition

https://www.kramerlevin.com/en/practices/intellectual- property/unfair-
competition.html?tab=overview
KRISTIAWAN, (2018) - PENGEMBANGAN WEB BASED REPAIR

MANUAL UNTUK PANDUAN PRAKTIK SISWA SMK N 2 YOGYAKARTA
JURUSAN KENDARAAN RINGAN https://eprints.uny.ac.id/55071/
MYFIXIT, (2020) - An Annotated Dataset, Annotation Tool, and Baseline

Methods for Information Extraction from Repair Manuals
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341606737_MyFixit_An_Annotat
ed_Dataset_Annotation_Tool_and_Baseline_Methods_for_Information_E
xtraction_from_Repair_Manuals
Taufik, M., Sutrio, A. S., Sahidu, H., & Hikmawati. (2018). Pelatihan Media
Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Kepada Guru Ipa Smp Kota Mataram.
Journal Pendidikan Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 77–81.
YANG, (2018) - Development and validation of an instrument to measure user

perceived service quality of information presenting Web portals
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/222513969_Development_and_
validation_of_an_instrument_to_measure_user_perceived_service_qualit
y_of_information_presenting_Web_portals
Taufik, M., Sutrio, A. S., Sahidu, H., & Hikmawati. (2018). Pelatihan Media
Pembelajaran Berbasis Web Kepada Guru Ipa Smp Kota Mataram.
Journal Pendidikan Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(1), 77–81.
APPENDICES
COLLEGE OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY AND TEACHER EDUCATION

Ma’am/Sir:
Greetings of peace!
This undergraduate research paper entitled “ Development and

Validation of a Web-Based Workshop Manual for Carbureted Honda
Motorcycles” prepared and submitted by Edzil L. Durango, Dale Alexan N.
Beniga, Sophia Rose Dumadag and Jerold S. Marino, in partial fulfillment of
the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Industrial
Technology Major in Automotive Technology.
In connection with this, we would like to ask your permission to be one of our
evaluators. Should this merit your approval, we would like to ask your active Gmail
account for we will be sending the Google Site Link and Google Form evaluation.
Your rating on the web-based learning module will provide us insights on how to
improve our output relevant to the students.
Thank you and God bless!
Sincerely yours,
EDZIL L. DURANGO DALE ALEXAN N. BENIGA
SOPHIA ROSE DUMADAG JEROLD S. MARINO
Noted by:
FRANK AIKEN O. ALAN, MoM

Research Instructor
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS EVALUATION CHECKLIST (IMEC)

Please choose the appropriate answer and write under REMARKS specific
comments/suggestions for enhancement of the material.
Rating Scale:1- NO EVIDENCE (NE)

2 - LITTLE EVIDENCE (LE)
3 - ENOUGH EVIDENCE (EE)
4 - HIGH EVIDENCE (HE)
Name of IM:_________________________________________________
(Optional)
Rater: ______________________________________________________
(Short answer text)
CONTENT
Parameters 4 - HIGH 3 - 2 - LITTLE 1 - NO
EVIDENCE ENOUGH EVIDENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
1. Comments and
Suggestions:
2.Is the content current

or up to date, relevant,
complete, and
accurate?
3.Does the level of

difficulty of content
appropriate for the
target end-user in
terms of age, abilities,
and time/period for
teaching?
4.Does the content

involve connections to
other disciplines and to
real-life situations or
the socio-cultural
environment of
students to promote
deeper meaning of
concepts?
5.Is IM free of gender,

social and cultural
biases?
6.Are the ideas

expressed in unifying
themes?
ORGANIZATION AND STRUCTURE

EVIDENCE
1.Is the material
easy for students to
use and
understand?
2.Are
instructions/directions in
the IM clear and
concise?
3.Are lesson
objectives
/outcomes clear and
appropriate?
4.Is the
layout/format,
narrative and visuals
of IM interesting and
appealing?
5.Are the
components of IM
logically organized,
unified and
consistent?
6.Does the IM
provide
opportunities for
students to use
ICT?
SUPPORT TO LEARNING

EVIDENCE
1.Does IM promote
collaborative
learning?
2.Are the learning

tasks motivating
and engaging to
students?
3.Does the
material involve
varied teaching
strategies?
4.Are assessments
of learning
appropriate to
achieve the
intended learning
outcome?
5.Are rubrics to
assess learning
provided?
6.Does the
material present
opportunities for
task –based
learning?
7.Does the
material support
self-directed
learning?
8.Does the IM
promote critical
thinking, creativity,
and problem-
solving skills of
students?
9.Is the IM free

from any form of
plagiarism?
(Sources are
properly cited)
Recommendation:
___________________________________________________________
(Optional)
Recommendation:
(Long answer text)
Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) Assessment
Directions: Kindly fill out the needed information. Please feel free to share your
thoughts and opinions. Your honest answer will help contribute to the success of
this study.
(4) - Always: At all times; all the time and on every situation (3) - Often:
Frequently or many times at short intervals (2) - Seldom: Not Often (1) - Not
at all
Website name:
____________________________________________________________
Ratee:
_____________________________________________________________
Functional Suitability
This characteristic represents the degree to which a product or system provides
functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified
conditions. This characteristic is composed of the following sub-characteristics:
Characteristic 4 3 2 1
1.Functional completeness:
Degree to which the set of
functions covers all the specified
tasks and user objectives.
2.Functional correctness:
Degree to which a product or
system provides the correct
results with the needed degree
of precision.
3.Functional appropriateness:
Degree to which the functions
facilitate the accomplishment of
specified tasks and objectives.
Performance Efficiency
This characteristic represents the performance relative to the amount of
resources used under stated conditions. This characteristic is composed of the
following sub-characteristics:
1.Time behavior: Degree to
which the response and
processing times and throughput
rates of a product or system,
when performing its functions,
meet requirements.
2.Resource utilization: Degree to
which the amounts and types of

resources used by a product or
system, when performing its
functions, meet requirements.
3.Capacity: Degree to which the
maximum limits of a product or
system parameter meet
requirements.
Compatibility
Degree to which a product, system or component can exchange information with
other products, systems or components, and/or perform its required functions,
while sharing the same hardware or software environment. This characteristic is
composed of the following sub-characteristics:
2.Co-existence: Degree to which
a product can perform its
required functions efficiently
while sharing a common
environment and resources with
other products, without
detrimental impact on any other
product.
3.Interoperability: Degree to
which two or more systems,
products or components can
exchange information and use
the information that has been

exchanged.
Usability
Degree to which a product or system can be used by specified users to achieve
specified goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction in a specified
context of use. This characteristic is composed of the following sub-
characteristics:
1.Appropriateness
recognizability: Degree to which
users can recognize whether a
product or system is appropriate
for their needs.
2.Learnability: Degree to which a
product or system can be used
by specified users to achieve
specified goals of learning to use
the product or system with
effectiveness, efficiency,
freedom from risk and
satisfaction in a specified
context of use.
3.Operability: Degree to which a
product or system has attributes
that make it easy to operate and
control.
4.User error protection: Degree
to which a system protects users
against making errors.
5.User interface aesthetics:
Degree to which a user interface
enables pleasing and satisfying
interaction for the user.
6.Accessibility: Degree to which
a product or system can be used
by people with the widest range
of characteristics and
capabilities to achieve a
specified goal in a specified
context of use.
Reliability
Degree to which a system, product or component performs specified functions
under specified conditions for a specified period of time. This characteristic is
1.Maturity: Degree to which a
system, product or component
meets needs for reliability under
normal operation.
2.Availability: Degree to which a
system, product or component is
operational and accessible when

required for use.
3.Fault tolerance: Degree to
which a system, product or
component operates as
intended despite the presence of
hardware or software faults.
4.Recoverability: Degree to
which, in the event of an
interruption or a failure, a
product or system can recover
the data directly affected and re-
establish the desired state of the
system.
Security
Degree to which a product or system protects information and data so that
persons or other products or systems have the degree of data access
appropriate to their types and levels of authorization. This characteristic is
1.Confidentiality: Degree to
which a product or system
ensures that data are accessible
only to those authorized to have
access.
2.Integrity: Degree to which a

system, product or component
prevents unauthorized access
to, or modification of, computer
programs or data.
3.Non-repudiation: Degree to
which actions or events can be
proven to have taken place, so
that the events or actions cannot
be repudiated later.
4.Accountability: Degree to
which the actions of an entity
can be traced uniquely to the
entity.
5.Authenticity: Degree to which
the identity of a subject or
resource can be proved to be
the one claimed.
Maintainability
This characteristic represents the degree of effectiveness and efficiency with
which a product or system can be modified to improve it, correct it or adapt it to
changes in environment, and in requirements. This characteristic is composed of
the following sub-characteristics:
1.Modularity: Degree to which a
system or computer program is

composed of discrete
components such that a change
to one component has minimal
impact on other components.
2.Reusability: Degree to which
an asset can be used in more
than one system, or in building
other assets.
3.Analyzability: Degree of
effectiveness and efficiency with
which it is possible to assess the
impact on a product or system of
an intended change to one or
more of its parts, or to diagnose
a product for deficiencies or
causes of failures, or to identify
parts to be modified.
4.Modifiability: Degree to which
a product or system can be
effectively and efficiently
modified without introducing
defects or degrading existing
product quality.
5.Testability: Degree of
which test criteria can be
established for a system,
product or component and tests
can be performed to determine

whether those criteria have been
met.
Portability
Degree of effectiveness and efficiency with which a system, product or
component can be transferred from one hardware, software or other operational
or usage environment to another. This characteristic is composed of the
following sub-characteristics:
1.Adaptability: Degree to which
a product or system can
effectively and efficiently be
adapted for different or evolving
hardware, software or other
operational or usage
environments.
2.Install ability: Degree of
which a product or system can
be successfully installed and/or
uninstalled in a specified
environment.
3.Replaceability: Degree to
which a product can replace
another specified software

product for the same purpose in
the same environment.
Comments and Suggestions:
CURRICULUM VITAE 1
PERSONAL INFORMATION
NAME Edzil Ledesma Durango

SEX Male
CIVIL STATUS Single
CITIZENSHIP Filipino
AGE 22
HOME ADDRESS P5A Libertad Butuan City
DATE OF BIRTH March 11, 2000
PLACE OF BIRTH Butuan City
RELIGION Roman Catholic
NAME OF FATHER Edwin C. Durango
NAME OF MOTHER Liza L. Durango
EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND
ELEMENTARY Libertad Central ELementary School
JUNIOR HIGH Butuan City School of Arts and Trades
SENIOR HIGH Caraga State University Cabadbaran Campus
TERTIARY Caraga State University Cabadbaran Campus
CURRICULUM VITAE 2
NAME Dale Alexan N. Beniga

SEX Male
CIVIL STATUS Single
AGE 22
HOME ADDRESS P-1 Brgy, Kauswagan Cabadbaran City
DATE OF BIRTH March 8, 2000
PLACE OF BIRTH P-1 Brgy, Kauswagan Cabadbaran City
NAME OF FATHER Alan A. Beniga
NAME OF MOTHER Rosedel N. Beniga
ELEMENTARY Francisco C. Jongko Elementary School
JUNIOR HIGH Cabadbaran City National High School
CURRICULUM VITAE 3
NAME Sophia Rose Dumadag

SEX Female
CIVIL STATUS Single
AGE 22
HOME ADDRESS P-6, Brgy.9,Cabadbaran City,Agusan del Norte
DATE OF BIRTH November 22, 1999
PLACE OF BIRTH Batangas City
NAME OF FATHER Roberto C. Gonda
NAME OF MOTHER Mylene D. Regis
ELEMENTARY North Cabadbaran Elementary School
JUNIOR HIGH Cabadbaran City National High School
SENIOR HIGH Cabadbaran City National High School
CURRICULUM VITAE 4
NAME Jerold S. Marino

SEX Male
CIVIL STATUS Single
AGE 22
HOME ADDRESS P-2 Poblacion 1 Santiago Agusan Del Norte
DATE OF BIRTH October 12 1999
PLACE OF BIRTH Tondo,Manila
NAME OF FATHER Harold Marino
NAME OF MOTHER Margie Seraspe
ELEMENTARY Mahay Elementary School Butuan City
JUNIOR HIGH Santiago National High School
CURRICULUM VITAE 5
NAME
SEX
CIVIL STATUS
CITIZENSHIP
AGE
HOME ADDRESS
DATE OF BIRTH
PLACE OF BIRTH
RELIGION
NAME OF FATHER
NAME OF MOTHER
ELEMENTARY
JUNIOR HIGH
SENIOR HIGH
TERTIARY

Group 14 Beniga

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Group 14 Beniga

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Group 14 Beniga

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CARAGA STATE UNIVERSITY – CABADBARAN CITY i

DEVELOPMENT AND CONTENT VALIDATION OF A WEB-BASED

WORKSHOP MANUAL FOR CARBURETED HONDA MOTORCYCLES

A THESIS MANUSCRIPT SUBMITTED TO

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE

To Mr. Joseph S. Yatan for patiently editing, correcting and giving

valuable suggestions which enriched the manuscript;

financial support, encouragement, steadfast love and understanding which serve

as an inspiration for the researchers to continue and finish this research

To them, we give our most sincere gratitude.

This work is wholeheartedly dedicated to:

Our parents, sisters, brothers, and friends

whose ever-loving care, moral support and

encouragement have given us more inspiration than

what we have expected.

This piece of work is lovingly and gratefully

dedicated most of all to the Almighty God,

the source of all that we have.

motorcycle (exclusively carbureted Honda motorcycles only). This study titled

“Development and Validation of a Web-Based Workshop Manual for Carbureted

Honda Motorcycles” can help automotive students, mechanics experts and

instructors, and motorcycle owners be productive during this pandemic in terms

technology because of the stay-at-home policy mandated by the government,

of browsing social media platforms, motorcycle owners and automotive students

This study was conducted in Cabadbaran City. Convenience sampling

There were 20 professionals as respondents who rated the web-based manual.

Checklist (IMEC), with a descriptive interpretation of High Evidence as based on

total mean of 3.35 and a descriptive interpretation of High Evidence based on

Background of the Study..............................................................................................

Objectives of the Problem............................................................................................

Significance of the Study..............................................................................................

Scope and Delimitation of the Study............................................................................

Review of Related Literature and Studies....................................................................

Locale of the Study.......................................................................................................

Respondents of the Study............................................................................................

Instructional Material Development............................................................................

Statistical Treatment of Data......................................................................................

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS....................................................................................

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.................

CURRICULUM VITAE 1................................................................................................

CURRICULUM VITAE 2................................................................................................

CURRICULUM VITAE 3................................................................................................

CURRICULUM VITAE 4................................................................................................

Table Description Page

1 Scale for Instructional Materials Evaluation 13

2 Scale for Product Quality (ISO/IEC 25010) 17

Figure Description Page

2 Locale of the Study 9

4 Organization and Structure 14

Background of the Study

A workshop manual is a detailed description of how to repair a vehicle,

come as a priceless source of required information. Simply put, it is a manual

certain components of your vehicle. Previously, a workshop manual used to be a

download as per the make and model of your vehicle.

Our web-based workshop manual can help the carbureted Honda

motorcycle owners because we covered only the carbureted engines of Honda

manual of their motorcycles are easily accessible. This web-based manual is

user- friendly and accessible in any area with internet connection.

become productive during this pandemic.