Recent Therapeutic Advances in ES-SCLC: Dr. Andika Chandra Putra, PH.D, SP.P (K)
Recent Therapeutic Advances in ES-SCLC: Dr. Andika Chandra Putra, PH.D, SP.P (K)
Recent Therapeutic Advances in ES-SCLC: Dr. Andika Chandra Putra, PH.D, SP.P (K)
ES-SCLC
IFCT-1603
The phase I/II study In progress/not The study reached The study did not reach
reported endpoints reported the primary to the end
endpoint
Phase III Trials: Addition of Anti‒PD-L1 Checkpoint Inhibitors to First-
line Platinum + Etoposide in ES-SCLC
IMpower1331,2 CASPIAN3
Stratified by sex, ECOG PS 0 vs 1, brain metastases (yes vs no) Stratified by planned carboplatin vs cisplatin
Induction Maintenance
Induction: 4 x 21-day cycles Maintenance* D + T + EP†
D + T Q4W
Patients with Q3W x 4 cycles
Patients with until PD
Atezolizumab + treatment-naive (n = 268)
measurable ES-SCLC; Atezo
Carboplatin/Etoposide ES-SCLC;
ECOG PS 0/1; no prior until PD
(n = 201) WHO PS 0/1; D + EP†
systemic therapy for D Q4W
asymptomatic or Q3W x 4 cycles
ES-SCLC; treated, until PD
treated and stable (n = 268)
asymptomatic brain Placebo +
Placebo brain metastases
metastases eligible Carboplatin/Etoposide
until PD (N = 805) EP†
(N = 403) (n = 202) Optional
Q3W x 4-6 cycles
PCI
*PCI per local SoC. (n = 269)
†Either carboplatin or cisplatin.
▪ Coprimary endpoints: OS, PFS by investigator ▪ Primary endpoint: OS
▪ Secondary endpoints: ORR, DoR, safety ▪ Secondary endpoints: PFS, ORR, safety/tolerability, PROs
1. Liu. JCO. 2021;39:619. 2. Horn. NEJM. 2018;379:2220. 3. Paz-Ares. ESMO Open. 2022;7:100408.
Phase III Trials: First-line Platinum/Etoposide + ICI in ES-SCLC
Effect of first-line serplulimab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on
survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. The
ASTRUM-005 randomized clinical trial
Cheng Y, Han L, et al. JAMA 2022;328(12):1223-32
Kesimpulan:
•Serplulimab plus kemoterapi memiliki probabilitas paling tinggi untuk OS dan PFS yang lebih baik.
•Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna dalam hal ORR dan efek samping derajat ≥ 3 di antara berbagai
pilihan terapi.
Summary
In the updated analysis, serplulimab plus chemotherapy continued to provide benefits in OS,
PFS, ORR, and DOR compared with placebo plus chemotherapy.
➢ Median OS: 15.8 vs. 11.1 months; HR, 0.62; p<0.001.
➢ Median PFS by IRRC per RECIST v1.1: 5.8 vs. 4.3 months; HR, 0.47; p<0.001.
➢ ORR: 68.9% vs. 58.7%; median DOR: 6.5 vs. 4.2 months (HR, 0.45) as assessed by IRRC per
RECIST v1.1.
➢ The improved OS with serplulimab plus chemotherapy was observed across subgroups,
including Asian and non-Asian.
The safety profile was similar between the two groups and consistent with that previously
observed.
TERIMA KASIH