Demographic data analysis:

Demographic variable Freq %

Age
21 – 25 years 5 50%
26 – 30 years 3 30%
31 – 35 years 2 20%
Gender
Male 3 30%
Female 7 70%
Marital Status
Married 5 50%
Unmarried 4 40%
Divorced 1 10%
Professional Qualification
G.N.M 5 50%
B.Sc. Nursing 5 50%
Years of Experience
1-5 years 5 50%
6-10 years 5 50%
Area of Work
Casualty 2 20%
ICU/HDU 1 10%
General Ward 7 70%
Area of living
Urban 10 100%
Type of family
Joint 2 20%
Nuclear 5 50%
Extended 3 30%
Selection of profession with interest
Yes 7 70%
No 3 30%
Coping Strategies Adopted
Listening to music 4 40%
Reading 3 30%
Watching Television 2 20%
Sleeping 1 10%
History of any physical illness such as Asthma,
Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Anaemia etc
Yes 2 20%
No 8 80%
Any recent loss
Yes 2 20%
No 8 80%
50% of the nursing officers were between the age 21-25 years, 30% of them between the age
26-30 years and 20% of them between the age 31-35 years.
30% of them were males and 70% of them were females.
50% of them were married, 40% of them were unmarried and 10% of them were divorced.
50% of them were GNM and 50% of them were B.Sc. Nursing.
50% of them had experience 1 to 5 years and 50% of them had age 6 to 10 years.
20% of them were working in casualty, 10% of them were working in ICU/HDU and 70% of
them were working in general ward.
All of them were living in urban area.
20% of them were from joint family, 50% of them had nuclear family and 30% of them had
extended family.
70% of them had selected profession with interest.
40% of them had adapted listening strategy, 30% of them had adapted reading strategy, 20%
of them had adapted watching strategy and 10% of them had adapted sleeping strategy.
20% of them had history of physical illness.
20% of them had recent loss.

Age

20%

50%

30%

21 – 25 years 26 – 30 years 31 – 35 years

 Gender

30%

70%

Male Female

Professional Qualification

50% 50%

G.N.M B.Sc. Nursing

Years of Experience
60%
50% 50%
50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%
1-5 years 6-10 years
 Area of Work

70%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30% 20%
20% 10%
10%
0%
Casualty ICU/HDU General Ward

Type of family

50%
50%

40%
30%
30%
20%
20%

10%

0%
Joint Nuclear Extended

Selection of profession with interest

30%

70%

Yes No
 Coping Strategies Adopted
50%
40%
40%
30%
30%
20%
20%
10%
10%

0%
Listening to Reading Watching Sleeping
music Television

History of any major physical illness such as Asthma,

Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension etc

20%

80%

Yes No

Any recent loss

90%
80%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
20%
10%
0%
Yes No
Objective 1: To assess the level of compassion fatigue among Nursing Officers working
in selected hospitals of Pune city

Compassion Satisfaction:
Compassion Satisfaction Pretest
Freq %
Low (score <=22) 4 40%
Moderate (score 23-41) 6 60%
High (score >=42) 0 0%

In pretest, 40% of the nursing officers had low compassion satisfaction (score <=22) and 60%
of them had moderate (score 23-41).

Pretest Compassion Satisfaction among Nursing

Officers working in selected hospitals
70%
60%
60%
50%
40%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Burnout:

Burnout Pretest
Freq %
Low (score <=22) 0 0%
Moderate (score 23-41) 7 70%
High (score >=42) 3 30%

In pretest, 70% of the nursing officers had moderate burnout (Score 23-41) and 30% of them
had high burnout (score >=42).

Pretest burnout among Nursing Officers working in

selected hospitals
80%
70%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Secondary Traumatic Stress:

Secondary Traumatic Stress Pretest

Freq %
Low (score <=22) 0 0%
Moderate (score 23-41) 7 70%
High (score >=42) 3 30%

In pretest, 70% of the nursing officers had moderate secondary traumatic stress (Score 23-41)
and 30% of them had high secondary traumatic stress (score >=42).

Pretest Secondary Traumatic Stress among Nursing

Officers working in selected hospitals
80%
70%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
30%
20%
10%
0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Objective 2: To assess the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on
Compassion Fatigue among Nursing Officers working in selected hospitals of Pune city

Compassion Satisfaction:

Compassion Satisfaction Pretest Posttest

Freq % Freq %
Low (score <=22) 4 40% 0 0%
Moderate (score 23-41) 6 60% 9 90%
High (score >=42) 0 0% 1 10%

In pretest, 40% of the nursing officers had low compassion satisfaction (score <=22) and 60%
of them had moderate (score 23-41). In posttest, 90% of the nursing officers had moderate
(score 23-41) and 10% of them had high compassion satisfaction (score >=42). This indicates
that the compassion satisfaction among nursing officers improved remarkably after
Resiliency and Recovery Program.

Compassion Satisfaction among Nursing Officers

working in selected hospitals in Pretest and posttest
100% 90%
80%
60%
60%
40%
40%
20% 10%
0% 0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Pretest Posttest
Paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on Compassion
satisfaction among Nursing Officers

Mean SD T df p-value
Pretest 23.2 3.8 12.7 9 0.000
Posttes
t 34.4 3.6

Researcher applied paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on
Compassion satisfaction among Nursing Officers. Average compassion satisfaction score
among nursing officers in pretest was 23.2 which increased to 34.4 in posttest. T-value for
this test was 12.7 with 9 degrees of freedom. Corresponding p-value was small (less than
0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. It is evident that the compassion satisfaction among
nursing officers improved significantly after Resiliency and Recovery Program. Resiliency
and Recovery Program is significantly effective in improving the compassion satisfaction
among nursing officers.

Average Compassion Satisfaction score among Nursing

Officers working in selected hospitals in pretest and
posttest

34.4
40 23.2
30
20
10
0
Pretest Posttest
Burnout:

Burnout Pretest Posttest

Freq % Freq %
Low (score <=22) 0 0% 4 40%
Moderate (score 23-41) 7 70% 6 60%
High (score >=42) 3 30% 0 0%

In pretest, 70% of the nursing officers had moderate burnout (Score 23-41) and 30% of them
had high burnout (score >=42). In posttest, 40% of the nursing officers had low burnout
(Score <=22) and 60% of them had moderate burnout (Score 23-41). This indicates that the
burnout among nursing officers improved remarkably after Resiliency and Recovery
Program.

Burnout among Nursing Officers working in selected

hospitals in Pretest and posttest
80% 70%
60%
60%
40%
40% 30%

20%
0% 0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Pretest Posttest
Paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on burnout
among Nursing Officers

Mean SD T df p-value
Pretest 37.6 3.6 18.1 9 0.000
Posttes
t 25.2 4.7

Researcher applied paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on
burnout among Nursing Officers. Average burnout score among nursing officers in pretest
was 37.6 which increased to 25.2 in posttest. T-value for this test was 18.1 with 9 degrees of
freedom. Corresponding p-value was small (less than 0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. It
is evident that the burnout among nursing officers reduced significantly after Resiliency and
Recovery Program. Resiliency and Recovery Program is significantly effective in reducing
the burnout among nursing officers.

Average burnout score among Nursing Officers

working in selected hospitals in pretest and posttest

37.6
40
25.2
30

20

10

0
Pretest Posttest
Secondary Traumatic Stress:

Secondary Traumatic Stress Pretest Posttest

Freq % Freq %
Low (score <=22) 0 0% 2 20%
Moderate (score 23-41) 7 70% 8 80%
High (score >=42) 3 30% 0 0%

In pretest, 70% of the nursing officers had moderate secondary traumatic stress (Score 23-41)
and 30% of them had high secondary traumatic stress (score >=42). In posttest, 20% of the
nursing officers had low moderate secondary traumatic stress (Score <=22) and 80% of them
had moderate secondary traumatic stress (score 23-41). This indicates that the Secondary
Traumatic Stress among nursing officers improved remarkably after Resiliency and Recovery
Program.

Secondary Traumatic Stress among Nursing Officers

working in selected hospitals in Pretest and posttest
100%
80%
80% 70%
60%
40% 30%
20%
20%
0% 0%
0%
Low Moderate High
Pretest Posttest
Paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on Secondary
Traumatic Stress among Nursing Officers

Mean SD T df p-value
Pretest 38.1 4.3 11.9 9 0.000
Posttes
t 25.6 2.6

Researcher applied paired t-test for the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on
Secondary Traumatic Stress among Nursing Officers. Average Secondary Traumatic Stress
score among nursing officers in pretest was 38.1 which increased to 25.6 in posttest. T-value
for this test was 11.9 with 9 degrees of freedom. Corresponding p-value was small (less than
0.05), the null hypothesis is rejected. It is evident that the Secondary Traumatic Stress among
nursing officers improved significantly after Resiliency and Recovery Program. Resiliency
and Recovery Program is significantly effective in improving the Secondary Traumatic Stress
among nursing officers.

Average Secondary Traumatic Stress score among

Nursing Officers working in selected hospitals in
pretest and posttest

38.1
40 25.6
30
20
10
0
Pretest Posttest
 SYMBIOSIS COLLEGE OF NURSING

SYMBIOSIS INTERNATIONAL (DEEMED UNIVERSITY)

PILOT STUDY ANALYSIS

TITLE OF THE STUDY

A study to assess the effectiveness of Resiliency and Recovery Program on
Compassion Fatigue among Nursing Officers working in selected hospitals of
Pune city

Research Guide:

Dr. Sheela Upendra

Deputy Director And Professor,
Symbiosis College of Nursing, Pune

Name of Student:

Mrs. Betsy Sara Zacharias

First Year M.Sc. Nursing
Symbiosis College of Nursing, Pune