Art349w Pratt
Art349w Pratt
Art349w Pratt
Lord Alfred Tennyson’s poem “The Lady of Shalott” has been a great
medieval legends. Set within the realm of Arthurian literature, the Lady’s
mysterious and lonely story is that of a woman cursed to remain in a tower and
endure the consequences of a desired but forbidden affection. “The Lady of Shalott”
roles were that of domesticity and suppression. Though their lives were tainted, a
through artwork. Additionally, there was much debate during the mid-19th century
over the union of painting and poetry. Tennyson sought to celebrate life and death,
reality and spirit, and the necessity of love in human experience.1 Artists such as
William Holman Hunt and John William Waterhouse depicted the Lady as a glorified,
tragic heroine, and similar to a “femme fatale,” whereas Elizabeth Siddal depicted
the Lady as a more realistic “femme covert” who was suppressed by Victorian
“The Lady of Shalott” takes place on an isolated island where the Lady is
forbidden to look outside her window to the world of opportunity. The Lady only
sees the world through a mirror of shadows, and from this reflection, she weaves a
tapestry. The Lady is cursed to solitary confinement for reasons unknown, and she
yearns for real experience.2 It is later known that the curse the Lady suffers under is
1 Edgar F. Shannon, Jr., “Poetry as Vision: Sight and Insight in “The Lady of Shalott”,”
Victorian Poetry 19.3 (1981): 208.
2 Jan Marsh, Pre-Raphaelite Women: Images of Femininity (New York: Harmony
1
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
that of original sin – the sin of pain and death manifested upon all of humanity.3 The
Lady experiences a burst of insight into the real world, as is from blindness; this
occurs in various stages of perception. The tale of “The Lady of Shalott” became a
concept instead of an archetype, and in fact became a notable romantic idiom and
catch-phrase.4
The Lady of Shalott, having been started around 1886, was William Holman
Hunt’s last and greatest work, as it was completed in 1905 when his eyesight began
Figure 1: William Holman Hunt, "The Lady of filled with the comprehension of love,
Shalott", 1886. Retrieved April 3, 2011, from:
ARTstor database.
both human and spirit.6 A series of
visual puns litter this painting, such as ‘coming undone’, ‘moral loosening’, and
2
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
sexuality. It’s no accident that the tip of Lancelot’s spear is piercing through one of
the loops of the weaving, which serves as another visual pun. In addition, his name
“Lance-a-lot” serves as a play on words. The spear enters her realm, referring to
sexual release and contrasting with the dull tower, which protected the sterility of
the Virgin and Child, Hercules in the Garden of Hesperides, and friezes of cherubs
depict religious and mythological symbolism. Hunt wanted to portray the Lady’s life
as engulfed in moral earnestness to show that religious faith was a key element of
her character.9 The Lady’s neck is pointed toward the image of Lancelot, which
shows that she made her choice to reject a life of religious celibacy.10 In addition to
this, Hunt illustrated discarded sandals, modeled after the Arnolfini Wedding
Portrait (1434) by Jan Van Eyck, to depict walking on sacred ground, as well as birds
The moment chosen by Hunt was a common choice for Pre-Raphaelite artists
in that it is the most dramatic – the moment when the Lady is condemned to die.12
3
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
Tennyson expressed that he wanted the first part of this specific passage to
be depicted, but the reason why is not certain.14 However, Hunt insisted on
certain as to what the nature of the relationship was between Hunt and Tennyson,
but Hunt’s representation is the only one upon which Tennyson personally
because the Lady would be frozen forever in a decision of defiance, which describes
the Lady as a naïve yet rebellious seductress. This is not how Tennyson wished to
portray her.16 Hunt defended his actions by stating that he “had only half a page on
which to convey the impression of weird fate, whereas you [Tennyson] use about
fifteen pages to give expression to the complete idea.”17 Hunt’s Victorian values may
have enticed him to turn a suppressed woman into a glorified rebel and create a
13 “The Lady of Shalott by Alfred, Lord Tennyson,” The Camelot Project at the
University of Rochester, http://www.lib.rochester.edu/camelot/shalott.htm
(accessed April 3, 2011).
14 Elaine Shefer, “Elizabeth Siddal’s “Lady of Shalott”,” Woman’s Art Journal 9.1
(1988): 25.
15 Ibid., 25.
16 Marsh, Pre-Raphaelite Women, 25.
17 Shefer, “Elizabeth Siddal’s “Lady of Shalott”,” 25.
4
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
the web of her unraveling tapestry with her hair messed wildly above her head.
disapprovingly asked, “why was her hair wildly tossed about as if by a tornado?”
and “why did you make the web wind round and round her like the threads of a
cocoon?”18 In this regard, Tennyson believed, “an illustrator ought never to add
anything to what he finds in the text,”19 stressing the importance of the painting as
remarks because he had modeled the hair after Mrs. Amelia Milnes, which took
three years to finish as he purposefully and carefully draped her hair over an easel
for a windblown effect.20 This representation of threads spiraling and hair loosening
(long flowing hair being the symbol of female sensuality) illustrates the release of
feminine energy.21 Secondly, Hunt interpreted the poem as a fable illustrating the
“failure of the human soul towards its accepted responsibility,”22 therefore viewing
the Lady’s response as a failure to accept the responsibility of original sin and her
However, Hunt misinterpreted the poem in this sense, for the Lady accepted
her fate: the curse of original sin had entered reality and became human.23
Tennyson stated his intended interpretation was that of “the new-born love for
18 D. S. R. Welland, The Pre-Raphaelites in Literature and Art (New York: Barnes and
Noble, Inc., 1953), 210.
19 Ibid., 210.
20 Wood, The Pre-Raphaelites, 109.
21 Udall, “Between Dream and Shadow,” 36.
22 Marsh, Pre-Raphaelite Women, 24.
23 Shannon, Jr., “Poetry as Vision,” 216.
5
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
something, for someone in the wide world from which she has been so long
secluded, takes her out of the region of shadows into that of realities.”24 Hunt’s
iconography illustrated moral disobedience and a conflict between good and evil,25
but by being trapped inside the tower, the Lady could not have accepted the
responsibility of original sin because she was shielded from its existence in the first
place. Instead, she was opened up to the world of reality. More importantly, Hunt,
and domestic duty of weaving as savagely destroyed by the power of the curse to
Hunt was an individual and original artist with what some art historians
describe as a “highly personal vision.” In fact, Hunt himself was rather lonely and
readings have been conducted regarding images of the Lady, and this has shown
that the Lady’s failure often strikes a nerve in the personal lives of artists.27 Some
critics from the 1950’s even stated that the Lady’s tapestry was a manifestation of
the problematic nature of an isolated artistic life.28 Therefore, Hunt depicts the Lady
much like himself, as she remains in her room while the consequences of her actions
leave her momentarily paralyzed, looking down at the world of opportunity below.29
6
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
John William Waterhouse was by far the most enigmatic of the Pre-
first depiction, titled The Lady of Shalott, was produced in 1888. It showed the Lady
casting her boat off into the overgrown brush and backwater of the Thames, floating
down toward Camelot with her tapestry web trailing in the water as she dealt with
the consequences of her inevitable death.30 Waterhouse’s first depiction played off
7
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
it was he who actually indirectly gave her insight, freeing her from social death
during life.32 Although the Lady had once perceived things through a mirror
without grasping the meaning, now she passes through death and can rest assured
that she will face eternal reality.33 This willingness to subject herself to the
unknown is a profound and sacred rite of passage from social death to social life.
Although it leads her toward death in the physical realm, the Lady decided that
taking her chances with physical death was better than enduring the social death
she had in life. As she floats down the river of eternal death, the Lady’s self-
assertion to free herself from the curse and to empower faith within herself as an
8
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
individual and as a part of mankind was a powerful message not yet understood by
Victorian standards.34
Waterhouse’s Lady is illustrated with candles and a crucifix at the bow of the
boat – two items which Tennyson would have condemned since they weren’t
mentioned in his poem. In addition to this, the Lady is seen as having taken the
tapestry with her; moreover, it never unraveled in the first place and in fact
survived, which is not true to the poem. Waterhouse defended his position by using
Tennyson’s own words against him: “art, even beyond the perception of the artist,
speaks of reality and both can and must exist in a real world.”35 Waterhouse
interpreted this as an approval of his depiction. Since, as Tennyson stated, art must
exist in the real world, her tapestry entered reality at the same time as the Lady did.
remaining. In the poem, the Lady’s tapestry was destroyed once she entered the
real world because since the Lady created the tapestry from mirrored images, this
form of art became removed from reality.36 Weaving the web of tapestry from
mirrored images portrayed art as imitation – a theory that was challenged during
Tennyson’s years.37 Tennyson stated that realism in art asserts fiction in poetry and
that the close relationships between artistry and realism should make an analogous
visual reproduction of reality. Tennyson also stated that the artist’s production can
only display a present time in and of itself and that the artist’s representation
destroys the medium of poetry not to criticize it, but to prove redundancy once the
34 Ibid., 216.
35 Wright, “A Reflection on Fiction and Art in “The Lady of Shalott”,” 289.
36 Ibid., 289.
37 Shannon, Jr., “Poetry as Vision,” 211.
9
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
chosen despite Tennyson’s claim that poetry expressed the dilemma in art, meaning
that art was stuck between fantasy and reality. In other words, Waterhouse’s
bondage imagery is ironic in the fact that Waterhouse was unaware that Tennyson
felt art itself was held in bondage, not poetry. This bondage motif doubles as a
motif for the suppression and restraint of Victorian women, who were cursed by the
10
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
Figure 4: John William Waterhouse, "'I am Half Waterhouse’s third and final
Sick of Shadows' said the Lady of Shalott", 1915.
Retrieved April 3, 2011, from: painting, produced in 1915, was titled ‘I
www.jwwaterhouse.com.
am Half Sick of Shadows’ said the Lady of Shalott. In this painting, Waterhouse
elaborately illustrated the loom and focused on the Lady’s gaze in the mirror, in
which two young lovers are in the distance of Camelot (Figure 4). This depicts the
passage:
11
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
approved domestic activity of weaving, illustrates ostracism and social death.42 This
is the moment when the Lady rejects complacently weaving all day, thereby
remaining cut off from the opportunity that awaits just outside her window.
Elizabeth Siddal presented one of the earliest and most accurate depictions
combated Victorian values and attitudes towards her roles as a woman and as an
artist. The woman artist was depicted as a mere dabbler and painting itself was
viewed as a hobby or even a luxury of the classes, but never something by which a
artists did not give credit to her ability, but rather focused superficially on her
a lovely figure, a stately neck and a face full of the most delicate and finished
modeling.”43 Clearly, the visual representation of women took precedence over any
belief in notable talent. And since “The Lady of Shalott” was a popular subject due to
the notion of the romanticized Victorian woman as a victim, Siddal was forever
12
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
representations, Siddal’s drawing also depicts the crucial moment when the Lady
seals her tragic fate. Siddal’s drawing remarkably contrasts with that of Hunt, in
which Hunt depicted that same moment to be one of confusion, excitement, and
disorder, whereas Siddal depicted the Lady as calmed, ordered, and quiet.45
Siddal’s Lady shows the dichotomy of struggling between two worlds. The
exterior world, symbolized by the mirror image of Sir Lancelot on the landscape,
and the interior world, where she has been solidly placed because of her femininity,
is juxtaposed. Siddal’s Lady does not occupy the same space as Sir Lancelot, unlike
world:
45 Ibid., 25.
13
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
This construction of the private, indoor domain for women, and the public, outdoor
world of men was a very real part of Victorian values in the mid-19th century. As
seen clearly in this representation, it is ironic that the Lady even looks out the
window, because at first all she sees is Sir Lancelot’s shadow, a mere reflection in
her mirror, meaning that she took her chances on an image she didn’t even know
gazing out the window past the crucifix. Although Tennyson might not have
depiction, this adds an element being ignored by the Lady: religion. As the Lady’s
hands carelessly finger the loom, Victorian audiences interpreted her gaze out the
window to Lancelot as the fall of humanity in which the Lady conducted an act of
moral disobedience. In fact, in Siddal’s depiction, the Lady gazes past the crucifix,
meaning that she does not care about the consequences of the curse. Instead, she
longs for reality and tangibility. Since the focus is solely on the Lady, the Lady
14
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
Siddal saw herself reflected in the Lady to a much greater extent than the
extent to which Hunt claimed to have been affected. As the Lady was confined to the
tower, Siddal was confined to the inside world. Both remained restricted to
reproducing simple mirror reflections of the world. As the Lady weaved steadily for
no one, Siddal’s hopes of reaching the outside world were remote, and her works
were not created for the public eye of the market.49 Unlike the wildly sexual,
longhaired Lady depicted by Hunt, Siddal portrayed the Lady as having hair pulled
back and tied at the nape of the neck, much like herself – a demure, modest,
downcast look.50 However, the fashion of the time consisted of a tight-fitting one
piece dress belted over the hips at the waist, proving that Siddal’s own self-image
catered to the role of Victorian women in that both she and the Lady were meant to
look innocent, yet sensual at the same time; although remaining a prisoner, she
for its endearing Arthurian quality. The Lady gained insight into the world by
combating the curse of original sin and the confinements of domesticity, thereby
embracing reality and human nature. The victimized Victorian woman and
poetry. The works of William Holman Hunt and John William Waterhouse are very
49 Ibid., 25-26.
50 Udall, “Between Dream and Shadow,” 34.
51 Shefer, “Elizabeth Siddal’s “Lady of Shalott”,” 26-28.
15
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
16
Ashley Pratt 4/20/11
Works Cited
Books, 1988.
Shannon Jr., Edgar F. “Poetry as Vision: Sight and Insight in “The Lady of Shalott”.”
Shefer, Elaine. “Elizabeth Siddal’s “Lady of Shalott”.” Woman’s Art Journal 9.1
(1988): 21-29.
278-301.
Udall, Sharyn R. “Between Dream and Shadow: William Holman Hunt’s “Lady of
Welland, D. S. R. The Pre-Raphaelites in Literature and Art. New York: Barnes and
Wood, Christopher. The Pre-Raphaelites. New York: The Viking Press, 1981.
Wright, Jane. “A Reflection on Fiction and Art in “The Lady of Shalott”.” Victorian
17