Psych 200-01 - Assignment

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 5

1

Summarization of “Integrating Technology In Neuropsychology Assessment”

Article

Soukaina Ouassaddine

Department of Psychology, University Of Concordia- Loyola

PSYCH 200-01: Assignment 2

Dr. Charles Stevens Leger

November 25, 2023


2

Summarization of “Integrating Technology In Neuropsychology Assessment”

Article

The situation of neuropsychological evaluations today and the necessity of incorporating

additional technology into the profession are covered in the article that follows.It highlights that

there is some resistance to adopting new technologies, but argues that a paradigm shift is

necessary (Miller & Barr, 2017). The paper addresses challenges, examines recent

advancements, and examines the background of the neuropsychological evaluation issue. It

specifically mentions the NIH Toolbox as an example of a new computerized assessment tool.

Literature Review or Background (This is a Level 1 Heading)

Computerized Cognitive Tests (CCT) are becoming increasingly important in cognitive

assessment within neuropsychology. The use of computerized cognitive tests offers advantages

such as easier data collection and processing, lower costs for large-scale studies, improved

accuracy in response time records, standardized stimulus presentation and response collection,

and the ability to integrate complex interpretive algorithms (Marques-Costa, Almiro, & Simoes,

2018).

Discussion

The study demonstrates the paucity of published psychometric research, and the authors

specifically stress the need for electronic tests to adhere to the same psychometric standards as

evaluations done with paper and pencil.In addition, a number of computer-based tests are

provided too soon and don't have enough psychometric qualities, normative data, or

documentation, according to the article.

One of the major scientific endeavors and technical advancements of the past few

decades has been the Human Genome Project.Furthermore, via initiatives like the NIH BRAIN
3

Initiative and the European Human Brain Project, the neuroscience community has embraced big

data. Through the quantity of data these initiatives give academics, researchers can better

understand aging and brain-related disorders by modeling the intricate relationships between

behavior and the brain (Bilder & Reise, 2019; Choudhury, Fishman, McGowan, & Juengst,

2014).Machine learning techniques applied to neuropsychological assessment instruments have

shown promise in automatic classification but are currently more effective as a form of screening

rather than prognosis.

There has been a significant development in psychometrics is item response theory (IRT).

It indicates if the items may be used to evaluate different regions of cognition and modifies the

degree of difficulty according to personal traits. IRT analysis allows for more accurate and

valid instrument construction.

A collection of tools called the NIH Toolbox Battery is used to evaluate behavioral and

neurological function. Apart from the integration of large data, it also includes contemporary

psychometrics and fosters global cooperation (Gershon et al., 2010). Tests such as the Cognitive

Ability Test and the Picture Sequence Memory Test are included. Tracking and a variety of

situations are things that are utilized by the battery. Its portability, ease of use, and accessibility

to normative scores are some of its benefits. Tablet use is limited by a number of factors,

including battery life and hardware/software issues. Although the iPad securely stores the app

data, privacy considerations should be taken into account.

Conclusion

At last, the article discusses the importance of integrating technology in

neuropsychological assessment. It largely focuses on the use of technological devices in

clinical practice and research, emphasizing the need for psychologists to acquire technological
4

knowledge and collaborate. The paper also mentions the potential of machine learning

algorithms for predicting diseases and the importance of prevention. It suggests making research

surveys available for open access and incorporating innovative developments in education.

Furthermore, the article addresses issues related to assessing older adults, data security, and

compliance with regulations. Overall, it emphasizes the potential for a paradigm shift in

neuropsychological assessment with technology integration, while acknowledging challenges in

ensuring high-quality and secure data.


5

References

Miller, J. B., & Barr, W. (2017). The technology crisis in neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical

Neuropsychology, 32(5), 541–554. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acx050

Marques-Costa, C., Almiro, P. A., & Simões, M. J. (2018). Computerized Cognitive Tests (CCT)

in elderly: A psychometric review. Revue Européenne De Psychologie Appliquée, 68(2),

61–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2018.04.002

Bilder, R. M., & Reise, S. P. (2018). Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get

there from here? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(2), 220–245.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993

Gershon, R., Cella, D., Fox, N. A., Havlik, R. J., Hendrie, H. C., & Wagster, M. V. (2010).

Assessment of neurological and behavioural function: the NIH Toolbox. Lancet

Neurology, 9(2), 138–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70335-7

Marques-Costa, C., Simões, M. R., Almiro, P. A., Prieto, G., & Pinho, M. S. (2023). Integrating

technology in neuropsychological assessment. European Psychologist, 28(1), 1–11.

https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000484

You might also like