Rapid, High-Temperature, Field Test Method For Evaluation of Geothermal Calcium Carbonate Scale Inhibitors
Rapid, High-Temperature, Field Test Method For Evaluation of Geothermal Calcium Carbonate Scale Inhibitors
Rapid, High-Temperature, Field Test Method For Evaluation of Geothermal Calcium Carbonate Scale Inhibitors
Summary. A new test method is described that allows the rapid field testing of calcium carbonate scale
inhibitors at 500°F [260°C]. The method evolved from use of a full-flow test loop on a well with a mass flow
rate of about 1 x 10 6 lbm/hr [126 kg/s]. It is a simple, effective way to evaluate the effectiveness of inhibitors
under :field conditions. '
Five commercial formulations were chosen for field evaluation on the basis of nonflowing, laboratory
screening tests at 500°F [260°C]. Four of these formulations from different suppliers controlled calcium
carbonate scale, deposition as measured by the test method. Two of these could dislodge recently deposited scale
that had not age-hardened. Performance-profile diagrams, which were measured for these four effective
inhibitors, show the concentration interrelationship between brine calcium and inhibitor concentrations at which
the formulations will and will not stop scale formation in the test apparatus. With these diagrams, one
formulation was chosen for testing on the full-flow brine line. The composition was tested for 6 weeks and
showeda,cl*~mnatic decrease in the scaiiHgoccurringat the tlC)1.7V',cQ~trol,valve. 'This,s,caJing . was about to force a
shutdown of a major, long-term flow test being done for reservoir economic evaluations. The inhibiror stopped
the scaling, and the test was performed without interruption.
Introduction
Calcium carbonate scale is often a severe operational prob- scale deposition on the aboveground piping of geother-
lem in geothermal brine-handling equipment. Deposition mal wells at that temperature. Harrar et al. 9,10 also
of this scale is rapid whenever the solution loses CO 2 studied scale prevention in geothermal brines by chemi-
gas, which allows the brine to become supersaturated in cal additives, seeding, and other approaches. However,
calcium carbonate compared with its soluble precursor their work was limited to temperatures not exceeding
calcium bicarbonate. Deposition of the carbonate solid on 260°F [127°C]. Lindenmuth et al. 11 studied several
the surfaces of process equipment has been prevented at commercial antiscaling agents in the 300 to 340°F [149
low temperatures with organic polymers and phosphonic to 171 °C] temperature range. These investigators ob-
acid materials. Essentially no work on calcium carbonate served that many antiscalants that are effective at low tem-
scale inhibitors at 500°F [260°C] has been reported peratures become ineffective as the brine temperature
previously. increases.
Statement of Problem Study Methods. Because our work was carried out at
This work was designed to find a rapid procedure for brine temperatures of about 500°F [260°C], we confirmed
evaluating high-temperature anticarbonate chemicals. that many of the low-temperature antiscalants were in-
Although laboratory tests could be used successfully to deed ineffective at this high temperature, as demonstrated
screen ineffective material's from those of questionable by our laboratory bottle tests.
utility, field evaluation was necessary to make a final de- About 40 commercial antiscalant formulations were
termination of effectiveness. evaluated in the laboratory. The most effective five were
A new, rapid, useful field test method was needed to tested in a field test loop with the new, accelerated test
compare inhibitor candidates quickly in flowing brines at reported here. Four were found to be effective inhibitors
about 500°F [260 °C] . under test conditions. One was chosen for on-line testing
of its ability to stop scale in the producing well's master
Previous Studies. Vetter et al. 1-8 studied scaling and control valve. It did work, eliminating further scale depo-
scale prevention ,methods in geothermal brines. They sition and preventing an inevitable, premature shutdown
evaluated organic scale inhibitors at about 350°F [177°C] of the deliverability test then under way in 1979.
and found several commercial compounds that prevent
Methods Used. Attempts were made to evaluate the scale
·Now with Petrolite Corp, deposition rates in the aboveground equipment with a wire
Copyright 1986 Society of Petroleum Engineers mesh screen mounted inside a 12-in. [30.5-cm] -ID spool
!
TO SEPARATOR -====:::;-;==t><I:~ TABLE 1-BRINE COMPOSITION ROOSEVELT
HOT SPRINGS 12
SCALE
WIRE SCREEN
INHIBITOR
INSIDE
mg/L
TEST SPOOLA\CALCIUM \
CHLORIDE, /
tI I 6' SPOOL
8i0 2 405
l
, 2 INCH
INE OFF
Ca 19
D ! Mg 3.3
TO ............... ~'----'I:~::::::::J><C:::;-~.:. BOnOM Na 2,080
PIT -~~7 120
K 472
ORIFICE INCHES
PLATE !... _._ HC0 3 158
80 4 65
CI 3,810
Fig. 1-Ten-inch-diameter test loop. F 7.1
inserted into a V-shaped test loop about 55 ft [17 m] long. pecially at points where CO 2 could be flashed because
The design is shown in Fig. 1. Although calcite formed of a constriction-induced drop in pressure.
on the screen, its formation was too slow to be useful as Two test sequences were used. In the first, the concen-
a rapid antiscaling field test method. So a 2-in. [5.I-cm] tration of calcium ion in the flowing brine was changed
line was taken off the bottom of the test loop, as shown incrementally by an increase in the addition rate of the
in Fig. 1. We found that the slow aqdition of a calcium calcium stock solution while the inhibitor concentration
chloride solution to the side stream would accelerate the was held constant. The changes were continued until a
I scaling rate at the test orifice plate, speeding up its detec- measurable drop in downstream pressure was observed
tion from days to minutes. The pressure drop across the within 10 minutes or less, which indicated that scaling
V2-in. [1.3-cm] orifice plate was monitored vs. time by was occurring and defined the scaling region on the per-
Heise™ gauges that allowed a change of IA psig [1.7 formance diagram (Figs. 2 through 5).
kPa] to be noted. In the second test sequence, the injected calcium ion
The calcite observed on the screen, however, was found concentration was held constant, and the inhibitor con-
to adhere and grow only on a magnesium silicate phase, centration was incrementally lowered from an initial value
whose X-ray diffraction was not found in the literature. in the no-scale region until a pressure change indicated
This gray phase was always found on top of a corrosion scaling at the orifice plate. After the lowest effective in-
product layer that appeared to be an ill-defined phase of hibitor concentration was found for a particular calcium
FexS y . Calcite was never found growing on or adhering ion concentration, it was raised back to its previously ef-
to the FexS y phase directly, but always on the silicate fective concentration, and the effectiveness was
phase. The silicate phase was never found attached to bare remeasured. ~
steel, but always on the dark FexS y phase. In two cases, the return to the higher inhibitor concen-
The brine used in these experiments was delivered at tration caused a lowering of the orifice pressure drop, sug-
about 495°F [257°C] from a well at Milford, VT, in the gesting that recently deposited scale could be broken
Roosevelt KGRA. The composition was similar to that loose. This property is a distinct advantage for commer-
shown in Table 1. With brine of this composition, the sur- cial uses because the inhibitor is able to remove scale that
face equipment was slowly scaling inside with calcium may form as a result of use of the inhibitor below its ef-
carbonate. Calcium carbonate deposition was an oper'l- fective concentration for a short time. If the scale has
tional problem for flow-testing the well and reservoir, es- hardened for several hours, however, this property is lost,
40 NO SCALE
NO SCALE
o 0 0 0
° 0 0
30 AREA OF
UNCERTAINlY
KEY ~ 20
Scaling stops when
Scaling stops when
inhibitor concentration
Inhibitor concentration
is raised from 1 to 2 10
10 IS rOlsed from 1 to 2
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 10 20 30 4.0 6.0 80 100
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 60 8.0 10.0
SCALE INHIBITOR B
SCALE INHIBITOR A
40 40
°
SCALE ::;'''\ NO SCALE SCALE
30 30
°
20 20
01 0.2 03 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 01 02 0.3 0.4 05 06 08 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0
SCALE INHIBITOR C SCALE INHIBITOR D
Fig. 6-Diethylenetriaminepenta(methylenephosphonic
acid).