Name of Work: - “Construction of New BG Railway Line Project from

Murkongselek station in the state of Assam (Ch: 0.780 Km) to proposed

Pasighat station in the state of Arunachal Pradesh (Ch: 27.062 Km) including
Electrical (General), Signal and Telecommunication works”.

DATE: 21th Aug 2023

SUBMITTED TO:
NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY
(CONSTRUCTION)
Maligaon, Guwahati.

HYDRAULIC DESIGN REPORT FOR BR. NO. 31

Contractor

Prepared By

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 1

 Statement of Confidentiality
This document is confidential and proprietary

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt. Ltd

Plot No.129, Sector – 1 – S,
New Panvel (E), Navi Mumbai – 410 206.
Maharashtra, INDIA. Tel.: +91 22 27469931
Email: support@beaverinfra.com
Web site: www.beaverinfra.com

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 2

 Construction of New BG Railway Line Project from Murkongselek station in the state
of Assam (Ch: 0.780 Km) to proposed Pasighat station in the state of Arunachal
Project Name
Pradesh (Ch: 27.062 Km) including Electrical (General), Signal and
Telecommunication works
BICPL/NFR/MZS-PAGT/2023/BR. NO.
Doc No. Date of Issue 21.08.2023
31/HY

Doc Title Hydraulic design report for Bridge No. 31.

Date of
Rev
Issue/ Description Changes made Prepared Reviewed Approved
No
Revision
Dibyendu RKC
R1 21.08.2023 First Issue NIL Pritam Das
Singha Sekhar

Prepared by Name: Pritam Das

Reviewed by Name: Dibyendu Singha

Approved by Name: RKC Sekhar

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 3

 TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................... 4

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................... 5

LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................................. 5

1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 7

1.1 General ............................................................................................................................................ 7

1.2 Scope of report ................................................................................................................................ 7

1.3 Codes and Standards...................................................................................................................... 7

1.3.1 Codes for design ................................................................................................................... 7

1.3.2 Software’s used .................................................................................................................... 7

2. HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR BR. NO. 31 ..................................................................... 9

2.1 Climate Conditions ......................................................................................................................... 9

2.2 Geography Conditions ................................................................................................................... 9

2.3 Design objectives............................................................................................................................. 9

3. HYDROLOGICAL DESIGN OF STREAM .......................................................................... 11

3.1 General .......................................................................................................................................... 11

3.2 Data requirement for bridges design .......................................................................................... 11

3.2.1 Rainfall .......................................................................................................................................... 11

3.2.2 Catchment area............................................................................................................................. 11

3.2.3 Declination of catchment area ..................................................................................................... 12

4. BRIDGE DISCHARGE CALCULATION ............................................................................. 14

4.1 CWC calculation of Discharge of north Brahmaputra basin ................................................... 14

4.1.1 Area of catchment (A) .................................................................................................................. 14

4.1.2 Equivalent slope(S) ....................................................................................................................... 14

4.2 Design Check................................................................................................................................. 15

5. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 17

5.1 Bridge discharge calculations. ..................................................................................................... 17

ANNEXURE-1:................................................................................................................................. 24

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 4

Discharge Calculation ...................................................................................................................... 24

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Catchment area (13768998.51sqm) ................................................................................ 19
Figure 2 : GOOGLE EARTH catchment image ........................................................................... 20
Figure 3: BHUBAN 2D catchment image ...................................................................................... 21
Figure 4 North Brahmaputra basin 100 year 24 hour rainfall .................................................... 22

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1 Bridges Details ...................................................................................................................... 9

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 5

 CHAPTER-1
INTRODUCTION

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 6

 1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
M/s Beaver Infra Consultants Pvt. Ltd. has been appointed as a consultant by the Track and
Towers Infratech (P) LTD, for Hydrological investigations of railway bridges of the project-
“Construction of New BG Railway Line Project from Murkongselek station in the state of Assam
(Ch: 0.780 Km) to proposed Pasighat station in the state of Arunachal Pradesh (Ch: 27.062 Km)
including Electrical (General), Signal and Telecommunication”.

The alignment of the proposed railway line Murkongselek to Pasighat connect two state of North-
east region Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. The awarded work falls between Ch 0.780 to 27.062
Km in connection with construction of the above-mentioned B. G line. It starts at Murkongselek
Railway station (Ch: 0.780km) and ends at Pasighat (CH: 27.062km).

The detailed hydrology study of following is mentioned in this report;

The hydrology report for BR. No. 31.

The project area receives maximum rain during northwest monsoon, particularly in the months of
June to September. The annual rainfall in surrounding project area is getting maximum of 480
mm for 100 year 24 hours rainfall.

1.2 Scope of report

The scope of the report is to analyse the hydrological conditions and rainfall conditions of the
overall project area and the rainwater catchment area of entire project area also studied. The
objective of the present report is to provide the peak discharge for BR. No. 31.

1.3 Codes and Standards

The design of drainage system is done in accordance with the reference codes and standards, to
meet or exceed the specified performance. Latest editions of following reference codes and
standards along with amendments wherever applicable will be used.

1.3.1 Codes for design

• RBF-16: Flood Estimation Method Report.

• IRS – foundation substructure code.
• CWC manual.
1.3.2 Software’s used

1) AutoCAD software has been used to find the catchment area from the Topographic
sheet of survey of India.
2) Bhuban 2D is used for identify the catchment.
3) Google Earth software has been used to identify the location.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 7

 CHAPTER-2
HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR
BRIDGES

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 8

2. HYDROLOGICAL STUDIES FOR BR. NO. 31
2.1 Climate Conditions

The climate of the area is warm, when compared with winter, the summers have much more
rainfall. The 100 years 24 hours annual rainfall in the area is about 480mm. These locations
are in the northern hemisphere.

2.2 Geography Conditions

Proposed alignment is located on the north bank of the river Brahmaputra It has an average
elevation of 150 metres. The evergreen forests on low hills create an undulating landscape.
After the detailed hydrological studies and climate studies the following BR. No. 31 proposed.
Physiographic parameters of various structure sites have been assessed based on Google earth
map and Auto cad software. Inputs in the study include the field surveys data, geotechnical
investigations, and information gathered during field visit, the following structures are
proposed;
Table 1 Bridges Details

Bridge no Types Chainage Size of Pr. Bridge

31 Major Bridge 12.280Km 4 x 45.7m

2.3 Design objectives

The primary objective of bridge design is to provide free movement of flood water or rain
water from the surrounding catchment area and locations without disturbing the movement
of trains and goods. The drainage system is designed to collect storm water run-off from
the surrounding areas, convey it along and through the right-of-way, and discharge it to an
infiltration system for ground water recharging and balance into a receiving body without
causing adverse site impacts.

The following design factor considered in design of bridge structure;

i. The bridge structures are planned considering the slope of the embankment.
ii. The bridges planned considering the ground levels, slope of the ground, valley and
ridges.
iii. The bridges planned considering the flood discharge of the area.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 9

 CHAPTER-3
HYDROLOGICAL DESIGN OF
STREAM

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 10

 3. HYDROLOGICAL DESIGN OF STREAM

3.1 General

Hydrological design of Stream is the study and analyses of the physical characteristics of
catchment, intensity-duration characteristics of rainfall of different frequencies to arrive at a
suitable method of predicting design (peak) flood and it is a very important step prior to the
hydraulic design of bridges drainage system. Such analysis is necessary to determine the
magnitude of flow and the duration for which it would last. It includes the analysis of size and
shape of catchment area, topography, land use characteristics, natural storage, soil type, soil
cover, drainage pattern, rainfall intensity of the area, time of concentration and the peak flow.

3.2 Data requirement for bridges design

The data required for the hydrological design include point value and intensity of rainfall of the
area concerned, the catchment area characteristics viz. soil type, vegetation cover, land use
pattern.

3.2.1 Rainfall

The intensity rain fall data is main factor for affecting water catchment area.. The project
area will be located Assam and Arunachal Pradesh Border area and north of River
Brahmaputra, The annual rainfall for surrounded project area is is getting maximum
100years 24 hours rainfall of 480 mm.

3.2.2 Catchment area

Response of a catchment (runoff) depends primarily on physical characteristics like

slope, soil type, vegetation cover, land use pattern and shape of the catchment. Soil type
is a major factor as erosion of soil may lead to gradual widening of culvert structures
eventually inviting unwarranted risk for the road section. The soil type, vegetation cover
is best ascertained from visual inspection (as effective catchment areas for roadside
drains are very small). In our project area mostly covered with steep rock cover so the
chance of erosion of soil very less. In this report catchment area have been assessed by
using contour map and site survey. The catchment area obtained from Topographic
sheet is 13768998.51 sqm.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 11

3.2.3 Declination of catchment area
a. Adjacent Land Runoff

Runoff from adjacent land depends on the topographical features of the area. It is,
therefore, necessary to gather information on natural or manmade ridge lines running
along the proposed road alignment. These ridges should be considered as boundary for
defining catchment area contributing to flow from the adjacent width of lands.
Topographic sheets are very useful in delineating small catchment areas. The accuracy of
manual delineation increases in rolling to hilly terrain. Special care is required for
delineating very small catchments in flat terrains.
In this report we are using to collect the water catchment area and hydrological detail like
slope, stream length, natural ponds, reservoir etc. are taken topographic sheets.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 12

 CHAPTER-4
BRIDGE DISCHARGE CALCULATION

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 13

 4. BRIDGE DISCHARGE CALCULATION
Considering that the catchment areas for the bridges are relatively big, hence we are adopting the
CWC manual for north Brahmaputra basin for estimation of peak runoff (Q). The design calculation
is elaborated below:

4.1 CWC calculation of Discharge of north Brahmaputra basin

This approach is appropriate for estimating peak discharges for big drainage areas of above 25
sq. km. In this approach flood peak is only estimated on the basis of regression relationship.
Flood peak with physiographic parameters and corresponding 100 yr TD hr point rainfall is read
from isopluvial maps supplied by the IMD are obtained by substituting the corresponding
parameters in the empirical relation developed on the basis of regression analysis. The peak
runoff (As per CWC Report) is given by the following expression,

Q100 = 0.8372A0.90662 L-0.36533 LC-0.20383 S0.31026 R1001.05471

Here, A = Catchment area in Sq Km
L = Length of longest stream along the river
Lc = Length of longest stream from a point opposite to centroid of catchment area
R100 = Point storm rainfall value for 24 hours 100 years return period in cm
S = equivalent stream slope

4.1.1 Area of catchment (A)

The water catchment area should be taken from following method,

a. Topographic sheets are very useful in delineating catchment areas. The accuracy of
manual delineation increases in rolling to hilly terrain. Special care is required for
delineating very small catchments in flat terrains.
b. Specifically, in this report Auto cad software is used for computing water catchment
area (A)from topo sheet.
c. The water catchment area picked from ground surface based on sloping pattern of
contour level.

4.1.2 Equivalent slope(S)

The L-section of river may be broadly divided into 3 to 4 segments representing the
broad ranges of the slopes of the segments and the following formula used to calculate
the equivalent slope S.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 14

 Li(Di-1 + Di)
S =
L2
Li = Length of the i th segment in km
L = Length of longest stream in km
Di-1, Di = Elevation of river beds at ith intersection points of contours reckoned from
the bed elevation at points of interest considered as datum and D(i-1) and D are the
heights of successive bed location at contour and intersections.

4.2 Design Check

During bridge discharge calculation required discharge (peak run-off Q) calculated and
from that the HFL for that discharge calculated. The design will be considered safe when
the provided bridges vertical clearance value is achieved above than the required HFL the
design will be considered safe and span size is sufficient.

The Detailed discharge calculations attached in Chapter 7.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 15

 CHAPTER-5
SUMMARY

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 16

 5. SUMMARY

5.1 Bridge discharge calculations.

As per detailed calculation provided in Annexure-1, maximum daily rainfall (480mm per day)

for catchment area of 13768998.51 m2 and flood discharge 1807.43 m3/s calculated HFL for span
of 4x45.7m is 148.838m and the total provided vertical clearance 3.047m which is greater than
required 1.5m, hence provided span of bridge is sufficient for that effective catchment area.

Detailed discharge calculations are mentioned in Annexur-1.

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 17

 CHAPTER-6
DRAWINGS

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 18

Figure 1: Catchment area (13768998.51sqm)

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 19

Figure 2 : GOOGLE EARTH catchment image

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 20

Figure 3: BHUBAN 2D catchment image

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 21

Figure 4 North Brahmaputra basin 100 year 24 hour rainfall

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 22

 CHAPTER-7
ANNEXURES

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 23

 ANNEXURE-1:

Discharge Calculation

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 24

 Estimation of de sign discharge in re spe ct of Railway Bridge NO. 31 On MSK to PAGT se ction of NF
Railway

(i) Catchment area A= 135.76 Km2

(ii) length of the longest stream course from source to the bridge site
L= 26.732 km (as per Topo sheet)
Lc = 13.888 km (as per Topo sheet)
Mean bed level = 144.623 m
(iii) height of the farthest point above the point of interest along the river
H= 1597.377 m (as per Topo sheet)
(iv) soil Red soil/clayey loam/cultivated plains/wooded areas
(v) subzone 2(a)

Flood estimation for small catchment :25 sq.km> area < 500 sq.km

Where
R is 100 year 24 Hour rainfall, 48 cm as read from Subzone 2(a)of north Brahmaputra

Q100 as per CWC flood estimation report of basin 2(a)

Q100 = 0.8372A0.90662 L-0.36538 LC-0.20383 S0.31028 R1001.05471

Here, A = Catchment area in Sq Km
L = Length of longest stream along the river
Lc = Length of longest stream from a point opposite to centroid of catchment area
R100 = Point storm rainfall value for 24 hours 100 years return period in cm
S = equivalent stream slope
Calculation of equivalent slope :

Height above
Reduced Length of
datum Di =
Distance each
Reduced level of river (m) Diff betweeen Di-1 + Di (m) Li(Di-1 + Di (m x km)
from Bridge segments Li
the datum and
site (km) (km)
the BL

0.000 144.623 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

5.064 160.000 5.064 15.377 15.377 77.869
7.223 180.000 2.159 35.377 50.754 109.578
9.465 200.000 2.242 55.377 90.754 203.470
16.122 300.000 6.657 155.377 210.754 1402.989
20.672 410.000 4.550 265.377 420.754 1914.431
24.040 800.000 3.368 655.377 920.754 3101.099
24.790 1000.000 0.750 855.377 1510.754 1133.066
25.594 1200.000 0.804 1055.377 1910.754 1536.246
26.550 1400.000 0.956 1255.377 2310.754 2209.081
26.759 1742.000 0.209 1597.377 2852.754 596.226
Total 12284.055

Li(Di-1 + Di ) 12284.055
S = 2
= m/km
L 716.044
= 17.156 m/km

Q100 = 0.8372(135.76)^0.90662 x 27^-0.36538 x14^-0.20383 x 17.156^0.31028 x 48^1.05471 x 0.997

Q100 = 71.85265423 x0.30101589 x0.584919026 x2.41554208 x59.32284 x0.997
Q100 = 1807.43 Cumecs

Add 30% extra for catchment upto 500 Sq.Km. As per IRS code for substructure design-Cl.4.4
Qf = 1807.43 + 30% of 1807.43
Qf = 2349.659 m3/Sec

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 25

Type of span provided = 45.7 m OWG girder
C/C of bearing = 47.24 m
No of span decided = 4
Observed HFL = 148.32 m
Vertical clearance required for Q 100 = 1807.43 cumecs discharge as per IRS Substructure code
= 1.500 m
Approx Velocity of flow as per Clause 5.9.2.1.2 of IRS substructure code
V = (Qf2/140)1/6 Width of unobstructed water way
Width of obstructed water way
188.96
= (2349.659^2/140)^1/6 x
178.56
= 6.174 m/s
Avg slope of river stream

145.292
Bed Level Level
144.623

Level
143.352
309 m D/S 291 m U/S

S = 0.0033
Mannings rugosity co-efficient, n = 0.033 From SP 13 for Clean, straight bank,
full stage, no rifts or deep pools
Total width of water way, B = 188.96 m
No of piers, N = 3
Effective width of pier, b = 1.5 m
Effective width of abutment, = 1.4 m
Effective width of water way, B' = 188.96-3x2x1.5-1.4
= 178.56 m
depth of flow = d
Cross section area of the river, A = B' x d
= 178.56d
Cross section area from Q 100 = Q100/V
= 1807.43/ 6.174
= 292.749 m2
So depth of flow, d = 292.749/ 178.56
= 1.64 m
Hydraulic radius, R = A/(B' + 2d)
= (178.56x1.64)/(178.56+2x1.64)
= 1.62 m
Actual velocity of flow = 1/n x R2/3 x S1/2
= 1/0.033x 1.62 ^2/3 x0.0033^1/2
= 2.402 m/s
Waterway area required for Q 100 design discharge
= 1807.43/ 2.402
= 752.469 m2
Design depth of flow = 752.469/ 178.56
= 4.215 m
HFL at Q100 = Bed Level + depth of flow
= 144.623 + 4.215
= 148.838 m
Vetrical clearance = Bottom of slab - HFL
= 151.885 - 148.838
= 3.047 > 1.500 Safe
Free Board = Approach bank height - HFL
= 152.427 - 148.838
= 3.589
Now we tte d pe rime te r re quire d as pe r lace y's e quation on aluvial rive r
Effective width of water way Pw = 1.811C√Q As per IRS foundation
= 1.811 x 2.67 x √1807.43 substructure code Cl: 4.5.3
= 4.84 x 42.52 C = 2.67
= 205.8 m > 178.56 m

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 26

 Hydraulic calculation of 31 (A1/A2)

HFL = 148.838 m Mean bed level = 144.623 m

Bottom of Pile cap = 142.400 m
Width of abutment = 1.4 m Width of pier = 1.5 m

Providing 4Nos of 45.7m clear span OWG Bridge

Length of bridge between c/c of Abutment
= (47.24*4) = 188.96 m
Clear linear water way provided
(as per cl.No.4.5.6 of IRS
Substructure &foundation = 188.96-(1.5x3)x2)-1.4 = 178.56 m
Code)
Discharge, Q = 1807.43 cumec
As per IRS code for
Increase over design discharge in % = 30 %
substructure design-Cl.4.4
Design discharge for detection of scour depth = 2349.66 cumec
qf = 13.16 cumec/m
Lacey’s silt factor for representative sample of bed
= 2.1 As per GT
material obtained from scour zone, Ksf
Normal Scour Depth (D)
By Lacey's Theory (D1) = 0.473 x (Qfoundation / Ksf)1/3
= 4.910
For Constriction :
Maximum depth of scour,D2

= 5.83 m
Adopted Scour Depth, Dmax = Maximum (D1 , D2) = 5.830 m

Scour Level
For Abutment = (Adopted HFL - 1.25*Dmax) = 141.551 m
Scour depth at Abutment below Bottom of pile cap = 0.849 m

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 27

 Hydraulic calculation of 31 (P1)

HFL = 148.838 m Mean bed level = 144.623 m

Bottom of Pile cap = 140.848 m
Width of abutment = 1.4 m Width of pier = 1.5 m

Providing 4Nos of 45.7m clear span OWG Bridge

Length of bridge between c/c of Abutment
= (47.24*4) = 188.96 m
Clear linear water way provided
(as per cl.No.4.5.6 of IRS
Substructure &foundation = 188.96-(1.5x3)x2)-1.4 = 178.56 m
Code)
Discharge, Q = 1807.43 cumec
As per IRS code for
Increase over design discharge in % = 30 %
substructure design-Cl.4.4
Design discharge for detection of scour depth = 2349.66 cumec
qf = 13.16 cumec/m
Lacey’s silt factor for representative sample of bed
= 2.6 As per GT
material obtained from scour zone, Ksf
Normal Scour Depth (D)
By Lacey's Theory (D1) = 0.473 x (Qfoundation / Ksf)1/3
= 4.573
For Constriction :
Maximum depth of scour,D2

= 5.43 m
Adopted Scour Depth, Dmax = Maximum (D1 , D2) = 5.430 m

Scour Level
For Pier = (Adopted HFL - 2*Dmax) = 137.978 m
Scour depth at Abutment below Bottom of pile cap = 2.870 m

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 28

 Hydraulic calculation of 31 (P2)

HFL = 148.838 m Mean bed level = 144.623 m

Bottom of Pile cap = 140.848 m
Width of abutment = 1.4 m Width of pier = 1.5 m

Providing 4Nos of 45.7m clear span OWG Bridge

Length of bridge between c/c of Abutment
= (47.24*4) = 188.96 m
Clear linear water way provided
(as per cl.No.4.5.6 of IRS
Substructure &foundation = 188.96-(1.5x3)x2)-1.4 = 178.56 m
Code)
Discharge, Q = 1807.43 cumec
As per IRS code for
Increase over design discharge in % = 30 %
substructure design-Cl.4.4
Design discharge for detection of scour depth = 2349.66 cumec
qf = 13.16 cumec/m
Lacey’s silt factor for representative sample of bed
= 2.6 As per GT
material obtained from scour zone, Ksf
Normal Scour Depth (D)
By Lacey's Theory (D1) = 0.473 x (Qfoundation / Ksf)1/3
= 4.573
For Constriction :
Maximum depth of scour,D2

= 5.43 m
Adopted Scour Depth, Dmax = Maximum (D1 , D2) = 5.430 m

Scour Level
For Pier = (Adopted HFL - 2*Dmax) = 137.978 m
Scour depth at Abutment below Bottom of pile cap = 2.870 m

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 29

 Hydraulic calculation of 31 (P3)

HFL = 148.838 m Mean bed level = 144.623 m

Bottom of Pile cap = 140.848 m
Width of abutment = 1.4 m Width of pier = 1.5 m
Providing 4Nos of 45.7m clear span OWG Bridge
Length of bridge between c/c of Abutment
= (47.24*4) = 188.96 m
Clear linear water way provided
(as per cl.No.4.5.6 of IRS
Substructure &foundation = 188.96-(1.5x3)x2)-1.4 = 178.56 m
Code)
Discharge, Q = 1807.43 cumec
As per IRS code for
Increase over design discharge in % = 30 %
substructure design-Cl.4.4
Design discharge for detection of scour depth = 2349.66 cumec
qf = 13.16 cumec/m
Lacey’s silt factor for representative sample of bed
= 2.3 As per GT
material obtained from scour zone, Ksf
Normal Scour Depth (D)
By Lacey's Theory (D 1) = 0.473 x (Qfoundation / Ksf)1/3
= 4.764
For Constriction :
Maximum depth of scour,D2

= 5.66 m
Adopted Scour Depth, Dmax = Maximum (D1 , D2) = 5.660 m

Scour Level
For Pier = (Adopted HFL - 2*Dmax) = 137.518 m
Scour depth at Abutment below Bottom of pile cap = 3.330 m

Calculation of afflux

Discharge = 2349.66 cumec

Velocity = 2.40 m/s
Area(A) = 978.21 m2
Total linear water way = 188.96 m
Avg depth = 5.18
clear linear water way = 178.56 m
Area(a) = 924.95

h = 0.338 x 1 - 1
= 0.05 m
= 50 mm
Vertical Clearence

Design discharge = 2349.66 cumec

As per cl.No-4.8.1 of IRS Substructure
Vertical clearence required = 1500 mm
&foundation Code
Vertical clearence provided = 3047 mm

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 30

 Bridge No-31(Chainage 0 is Ch- 12+176 in Plan)
Sl No X Y Distance Z
1 724401.394 3089797.276 0.000 145.385
2 724405.215 3089799.998 4.691 145.496
3 724410.447 3089803.351 10.906 145.387
4 724414.183 3089805.277 15.109 145.199
5 724416.747 3089807.591 18.563 144.903
6 724419.502 3089811.317 23.197 144.463
7 724421.141 3089813.229 25.715 144.304
8 724423.273 3089814.76 28.340 144.307
9 724425.167 3089816.508 30.917 144.365
10 724428.237 3089819.32 35.080 144.243
11 724430.042 3089820.582 37.283 144.175
12 724432.149 3089822.196 39.937 144.298
13 724434.101 3089824.016 42.606 144.214
14 724436.303 3089826.582 45.987 144.323
15 724437.744 3089828.06 48.051 144.265
16 724439.201 3089830.041 50.510 144.281
17 724440.166 3089832.054 52.743 144.259
18 724442.276 3089835.064 56.418 144.247
19 724443.689 3089836.9 58.735 144.266
20 724445.203 3089838.79 61.157 144.320
21 724446.443 3089839.698 62.694 144.073
22 724447.833 3089841.149 64.703 144.042
23 724449.616 3089843.089 67.338 143.948
24 724451.598 3089844.992 70.086 143.993
25 724452.688 3089845.949 71.536 143.965
26 724454.032 3089846.569 73.016 143.818
27 724455.653 3089847.185 74.750 143.793
28 724458.11 3089848.69 77.632 144.263
29 724460.786 3089850.031 80.625 144.012
30 724462.347 3089850.539 82.267 143.976
31 724464.663 3089851.065 84.641 144.070
32 724465.888 3089852.826 86.787 143.798
33 724466.894 3089853.862 88.231 143.961
34 724470.941 3089855.3 92.526 144.181
35 724474.477 3089856.347 96.213 144.723
36 724477.964 3089857.306 99.830 144.743
37 724480.546 3089859.161 103.009 144.815
38 724482.686 3089860.741 105.669 145.106
39 724486.031 3089862.586 109.489 144.505
40 724489.414 3089864.446 113.350 144.339
41 724492.166 3089866.127 116.575 144.563
42 724494.056 3089868.051 119.272 144.717
43 724497.778 3089870.627 123.798 144.785
44 724499.254 3089871.48 125.503 144.763
45 724507.104 3089873.98 133.741 145.378
46 724509.401 3089876.421 137.093 145.539
47 724511.478 3089878.421 139.977 145.504
48 724513.559 3089880.399 142.848 145.325
49 724516.282 3089883.939 147.314 145.149
50 724518.414 3089885.742 150.106 145.399
51 724521.168 3089888.445 153.965 145.401
52 724522.789 3089890.054 156.249 145.336
53 724525.486 3089891.62 159.367 145.532
54 724528.283 3089893.09 162.527 145.603
55 724530.84 3089895.41 165.980 145.579
56 724542.249 3089900.718 178.563 145.506
mean Bed level 144.623

BEAVER Infra Consultants Pvt Ltd 31