GP Industry Benchmark Report 2019
GP Industry Benchmark Report 2019
GP Industry Benchmark Report 2019
General
Practitioner
Industry Benchmark
Report 2019
Prosperity Health GP Industry Benchmark Report 2019 - Page 1
Prosperity Health GP Industry Benchmark Report 2019 - Page 2
Foreword
General Practice remains under financial
General Practice
pressure across the country. In this current
benchmarks are
landscape it is vitally important to know
a crucial tool in
how to improve profitability and where to understanding
look for assistance. the drivers in
your business.
We know that general practices are the backbone of the Australian medical
industry and they are the backbone of Prosperity’s health practice. Prosperity
Health specialises in providing medical and allied health professionals
with the financial services they need. Our team of specialists provide
comprehensive planning, accounting, audit, taxation, salary packaging and
personal financial advice to a wide range of health sector members.
With 11 partners and over 130 staff throughout the firm, Prosperity has the
necessary expertise, experience and resources to service our clients’ needs
throughout NSW, ACT and QLD. We are very proud of our leading reputation
and we follow best practice processes and procedures to ensure our clients
receive consistently high-quality services and solutions.
To provide our practice owning GP’s with accurate, real time industry
performance benchmarking information, we are proud to release our
fifth Prosperity Health Benchmark Study as a tool to assist practices in
understanding their key performance metrics and to help them keep ahead
of their competition.
Stephen Guthrie
Director
Prosperity Health
growing trend The April 2019 IBISWorld Industry Report into General Practice Medical
in better Services provides some interesting high-level industry statistics:
utilisation of • The General Practice Medical Services industry has grown over the last 5
the MBS and years at an average rate of 3.5% per annum and at 3.0% for the 2018/19
improved year. Some of this growth has been as a result of small increases to MBS
efficiencies in rates but the primary driver has been the increase in the number of
consultations and the impact of our ageing population.
the bulk billing
• Over the next five years, the industry is still expected to increase by an
system
average of 3.8% per annum, driven by both population growth and the
ageing population.
• A consequence of the ageing population has been the increase in bulk-
billing rates, which covered up to 85% of all GP consultations over the
past five years.
• Total visits to GP’s have been steadily rising for a number of years and the
report from IBISWorld expects this trend to continue.
While the number of patient visits is increasing, it appears that bulk billing
is driving this increase. As a result, total industry growth is being driven by
volume increase and not by price increases. This will continue to place further
pressure on GPs to improve their efficiency and could lead to GPs pushing
the boundaries of good medicine vs consultation time. This pressure could
be the reason we are seeing a growing trend in Practitioners trying to better
utilise the MBS and extract more value from the billing codes available under
the bulk billing system.
The IBISWorld Industry Report shows the growing trend in patient visits.
Industry average T his represents the average benchmark / KPI result across
the whole database of contributing practices
Highest 20%
This shows the benchmark / KPI result for the upper 20%
of each category, calculated separately for each individual
benchmark.
Over the next few pages we have listed some of what we see as the key
highlights from the study.
A large proportion of practice income is usually derived from the Service fees
charged to consulting Doctors. Consequently, the individual performance of
each Doctor in a clinic is crucial to the overall financial success of the practice
itself. Once practice expenses are paid and the practice profit is determined,
we can measure the contribution to this profit from each Doctor on a Full
Time Equivalent (FTE) basis.
The first piece of the puzzle is the level of billings by each Doctor. The
practice receives a service fee calculated as a percentage of the billings of
the Doctors and this generally makes up a majority of the income of the
practice. Some Doctors will bulk bill and others will have a majority of private
billings. Even when bulk billing, the amount billed is also then dependent on
the consultation level undertaken and billed.
Our benchmarking data show that the average billings per FTE GP is around
$411,000, with the top 20% of GPs billing an average of $567,000 per year.
Noticeably, the more successful practices tend to have a higher proportion of
Level B and Level D consultations.
While Service fees charged are dependent on many factors, including the
patient mix and supply of and demand for GPs in a particular region, as a rule
a higher percentage is charged by those practices where greater assistance is
provided by nursing and administration staff.
Where practice nurses are more involved in patient care and hence allow a
GP to effectively increase the overall patient fee base, scope exists to reduce
the Service fee percentage slightly and still see a financial benefit for both
the Doctor and the practice. However, the Practice needs to constantly
monitor the use of nurses (paid by the practice) to make sure that the Doctor
/Nurse mix is managed and remains financially viable.
Operating costs
Some of the less crucial benchmarking numbers from the study include other
operating expenses. While it is important not to pay too much for medical
supplies or outgoings, we have found that variances in these costs do not
make major contributions to the overall success of the practice.
All of the above factors form part of a bigger picture and drive the overall
profitability of the practice. One way to measure this profitability is the Net
Contribution per FTE GP. This is the actual profit of the practice expressed in
terms of the dollar value generated per full time equivalent GP.
This measure will vary from practice to practice and largely depends on the
patient demographic, the billing practices and the Doctors. To illustrate the
variability of factors, consider the following two scenarios:
Doctor A – privately bills above the MBS, has a high percentage of schedule
B consultations, averages four patients per hour, performs the majority of
consultations without nursing involvement and who pays 35% as a Service
fee to the practice.
Doctor B – bulk bills all patients, sees an average of six patients per hour,
utilises a variety of billing codes, uses the services of a nurse regularly and
pays 40% as a service fee to the practice.
Our study has found that the average practice generates a net profit of
approximately $37,000 per full time equivalent GP, whilst high-profit practices
achieve a 230% better outcome.
Given the risks involved in running a medical practice and the extra time
typically invested by owner Doctors into the practice, is this return on
investment enough to warrant the additional stress and time involved?
We have seen a growing trend amongst younger GPs to reject practice
ownership in favour of longer-term associate doctor agreements, in order to
benefit from greater flexibility and improved lifestyle outcomes.
This leaves a 4% profit for the practice - not a large margin for error. If
some Doctors demand a lower Service fee percentage or the staff mix isn’t
quite right, it is very easy to slip into a loss situation very quickly, where the
owners need to subsidise the underperforming practice. It is typically the
Owner Doctors who end up covering this shortfall and taking home a lower
percentage of their own billings.
This additional income can come from a number of sources, with the main
source being Government incentives such as PIP and PNIP. This income can
vary from 0% to 13% of patient billings, depending on a range of factors and
the accreditation of the practice.
• the rent charged is not substantially different from the market value of
rental rates for the rest for the premises;
• the rent is not related to the number, kind or value of requests for
pathology or diagnostic imaging services made by the relevant
requester; and
• if the provider is a pathology provider, the provider either establishes
an approved collection centre or an accredited pathology laboratory
in the premises within 60 days of entering the arrangement, or renders
professional services in the premises, and does not use or occupy the
premises for any other purpose.
With third party sources of income under pressure, many practices are
turning to technology to drive efficiency and process improvements.
Practices are increasingly investing in systems and technology to assist
in collecting richer financial data on a timelier basis, improving billing
automation between practice management systems and accounting
systems, automating patient booking systems and streamlining online payroll
and rostering systems.
Conclusion
At Prosperity Health we offer tailored benchmarking and practice consulting
services to help you monitor and improve the performance, growth,
profitability and value of your practice. For further details and to review your
own practice planning matters, contact your local Prosperity Health office to
arrange for an initial consultation.
With 11 partners and over 130 staff throughout the firm Prosperity has the
necessary expertise, experience and resources to service our clients’ needs
throughout NSW, the ACT and QLD. We are very proud of our reputation
among our clients and we follow best practice processes and procedures to
ensure our clients receive consistently high-quality service and solutions.
You may be interested in viewing our video series on GPs at our website
www.prosperity.com.au
Our experienced Prosperity Health team can work closely with you to assess
your individual circumstances and work with you to develop strategies to
reach financial goals and objectives.