Fnut
Fnut
Fnut
the current study, in addition to five other registered dietitians just included the main goals and some follow-up comments on
certificated by the Chinese Nutrition Society. There were 16 the behavior changes regarding to the individual goal.
decision trees in the current study, covering the majority of
macro- and micronutrients. Anthropometric Measurements
Body weight (BW) and body height (BH) were measured using
a standardized digital weight scale (Seca, Hamburg, Germany)
Personalized Nutrition Report and height meter (Seca). BMI is defined as weight in kilograms
The PN report included a summary of the individual’s divided by the square of height in meters (kg/m2 ). Waist
anthropometric, nutrient, blood, and genetic (nutrition-related) circumference (WC) and hip circumference (HC) was measured
profiles, an overall goal established by the registered dietitian, as using a non-stretch tape, and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was
well as personalized recommendations on lifestyle modifications. calculated accordingly. Body composition was assessed utilizing
All the PN reports were prepared manually by registered an InBody (Biospace Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), in which body
dietitians using the revised decision trees. In brief, the numerical fat percentage (BFP) was recorded. Systolic blood pressure
data collected at baseline (anthropometric characteristics, blood (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured by
biomarkers, food intake, PA) were categorized into three levels: an electronic sphygmomanometer (Omron, Kyoto, Japan). All
green (normal), yellow (higher or lower in moderation), and measures were taken twice at least. A third measure was taken
red (severely higher or lower), based on the Chinese standards when substantial discrepancies (difference ≥ 1%) were observed
published by the Chinese Nutrition Society and Chinese Medical in the first two attempts.
Association (13, 14). Then, the categorized parameters were
ranked, and 3–5 targeted goals were identified by registered PA Assessment
dietitians. Specific messages related to each goal were developed Intensity (vigorous, moderate, or walking), frequency, and
according to the decision trees to advise changes in dietary habits duration of PA were recorded using the short version of the
and PA (5, 15). A nutritional supplement was suggested when International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) to measure
the calculated intake of a certain nutrient was lower than 80% of the PA level (16). The minutes/week of each PA intensity
the estimated average requirement (EAR). The complete report was calculated. According to the IPAQ scoring protocol, the
was delivered to each subject at baseline. In the follow-up period, metabolic equivalents of task (METs)-min/week were obtained
the subjects received updated report sent by the dietitian every by multiplying the average energy expenditure by min/week for
2 weeks. This updated report was prepared based on the most each PA intensity (8.0 MET for vigorous intensity, 4.0 MET
recently collected 24 h-recall and wearable device recording, and for moderate intensity, and 3.3 MET for walking) (17). Total
FIGURE 2 | Overview of the study design. (A) Questionnaires, anthropometric measurements, blood, and fecal samples were collected at baseline and at end point.
Buccal cells were collected at baseline for genotyping. During the intervention, 24-h recall was collected every 2 weeks, and a portable device was worn every day. (B)
The subjects in the control group (CG) received non-personalized, conventional health guidance on diet, physical activity (PA), and nutritional supplements intake
based on the Dietary Guidelines for Chinese Residents and Chinese DRIs Handbook. A brochure summarizing the health guidance was delivered to each CG subject
at baseline, and follow-up notifications on nutrition education were provided biweekly to these subjects using WeChat. (C) The subjects in the personalized nutrition
group (PNG) received personalized nutrition solution on diet, physical activity (PA), and nutritional supplements intake from the registered dietitians based on the
decision trees. The personalized solution was updated biweekly based on the subjects’ dietary and PA changes.
of gene-diet interactions (20–28). A systematic review of the TABLE 1 | Baseline characteristics of the subjects who completed the study.
rationale for selection of genes will be published separately soon.
CG PNG P-value
N = 152 N = 166
Sample Size Calculation
It was estimated that a total sample size of 286 participants (143 Male (%) 60 (39.5) 71 (42.8) 0.551
per group) would provide 80% power to detect a more than 5% Age (years) 38.1±7.5 38.8±7.5 0.415
change in BMI (29) between the two groups, with a significance 25–34 64 (42.1) 69 (41.6)
level of 0.05. Allowing for a potential dropout rate of 25% during 35–50 88 (57.9) 97 (58.4)
the intervention, we recruited 400 subjects (200 for each group) Education (%) 0.441
at baseline. ≤ 9 years 9 (5.9) 15 (9.0)
9–12 years 15 (9.9) 20 (12.1)
Statistical Analysis >12 years 128 (84.2) 131 (78.9)
Statistical analyses were completed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute
Family monthly income (%) 0.572
Inc., Cary, NC, USA). All statistical tests were two-sided and
<20 000 RMB 16 (10.5) 24 (14.5)
performed at the 0.05 significance level. Means and standard
20,000–30,000 RMB 76 (50.0) 79 (47.6)
deviations (SD) were summarized for continuous variables with
≥30 000 RMB 60 (39.5) 63 (38.0)
a normal distribution; medians and quartiles were provided
Weight (kg) 72.7 ± 10.6 73.8 ± 12.0 0.378
for non-normally distributed variables; and frequencies and
Height (cm) 163.1 ± 8.8 164.3 ± 9.1 0.237
percentages were provided for categorical variables. Differences
BMI (kg/m2 ) 27.3 ± 3.4 27.2 ± 2.8 0.834
between the groups at baseline were assessed using analysis of
Body fat percentage (%) 27.2 ± 5.3 27.5 ± 5.1 0.646
variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables, and chi-square test
for nominal categorical variables. Evaluations of the intervention Waist circumference (cm) 92.4 ± 9.9 92.6 ± 9.5 0.863
effect were performed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) Waist-to-hip ratio 0.92 ± 0.08 0.92 ± 0.08 0.801
for normally distributed continuous variables, adjusted for Systolic pressure (mm Hg) 125.1 ± 20.4 123.2 ± 17.4 0.368
baseline values. Log transformation was applied to non-normal Diastolic pressure (mm Hg) 84.2 ± 9.7 84.2 ± 11.2 0.995
continuous variables. Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was used Smoking (%) 21 (13.8) 18 (10.8) 0.420
for highly skewed variables. The connections of longitudinal Alcohol (%) 28 (18.4) 26 (15.7) 0.513
correlation network were calculated by Spearman or Point- Data are presented as frequency (%) or mean ± standard deviation (SD).
Biserial and then plotted as a network by Cytoscape 3.8.2 Intergroup differences were evaluated using chi-square test or one-way analysis of
(Cytoscape Consortium, San Diego, CA, USA). variance (ANOVA).
BMI, body mass index; CG, control group; PNG, personalized nutrition group.
RESULTS
Study Design and Baseline Characteristics In addition, PN intervention was more efficient than
A total of 2,718 participants were screened, of whom 400 the conventional intervention in decreasing blood levels
eligible subjects were randomized into two groups: control of TG, TC, LDL, uric acid, and homocysteine (Table 2,
group (CG) and personalized nutrition group (PNG). During Supplementary Table 4).
12-week intervention, 82 subjects withdrew, resulting in a
total dropout rate of 20.5% (Figure 1). The subjects in PNG Effect of PN Intervention on Dietary Intake
received a personalized nutrition solution on diet, PA, and PN intervention significantly improved the overall diet
nutritional supplements intake, which was provided by registered quality of the subjects, as reflected in the CDGI (Table 3).
dietitians using decision trees. The subjects in CG received Compared with the subjects in CG, the subjects receiving
non-personalized, conventional health guidance (Figure 2). The PN intervention consumed more whole grains, vegetables,
baseline characteristics of the subjects, including demographics especially dark green vegetables, fruits, dairy products, and
and anthropometrics, were comparable between the two nuts. Within-intervention comparison showed the improvement
groups (Table 1). of diet quality in both groups, but PNG showed greater
improvement (Supplementary Table 5). Although the energy
Effect of PN Intervention on intake was not signficantly differed, compared with the CG,
Anthropometric Measurements and Blood the PNG had substantially reduced fat consumption and
Biomarkers increased dietary intake of beneficial vitamin and minerals
After 12 weeks of intervention, the subjects in both (Supplementary Table 6). The dietary modification partially
CG and PNG experienced significant improvement in explained why we observed significantly higher circulating
weight, BMI, body fat percentage, waist circumference, EPA, folic acid and calcium levels in the PNG than CG
and waist-to-hip ratio (Supplementary Table 3). The (Table 2). Dietary supplement intake was beneficial in
effects of PN intervention on decreasing BMI, body fat improving blood biomarkers, and Multi-Vitamin and Minerals
percentage, waist circumference, and waist-to-hip ratio were (MVM) was the only supplement that led to significant BMI
significantly more potent than those in CG (Figure 3). decrease (Figure 4).
FIGURE 3 | Changes in anthropometric measurements between CG and PNG. Intergroup differences in changes in anthropometric measurements (A–D) were
evaluated using Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
TG, mmol/L a Baseline 1.12 (0.82, 1.68) 1.27 (0.93, 1.81) −0.03 (−0.05, −0.001) 0.045
Week 12 0.99 (0.76, 1.36) 1.03 (0.72, 1.41)
TC, mmol/L Baseline 5.21 (0.93) 5.28 (0.93) −0.15 (−0.25, −0.05) 0.004
Week 12 5.07 (0.88) 4.97 (0.89)
HDL, mmol/L Baseline 1.51 (0.28) 1.51 (0.26) 0.04 (−0.003, 0.08) 0.067
Week 12 1.59 (0.31) 1.63 (0.28)
LDL, mmol/L Baseline 2.93 (0.71) 2.94 (0.72) −0.10 (−0.19, −0.02) 0.020
Week 12 2.67 (0.69) 2.58 (0.77)
Glucose, mmol/L a Baseline 4.70 (4.45, 5.20) 4.70 (4.50, 5.30) −0.005 (−0.02, 0.01) 0.455
Week 12 4.50 (4.10, 5.25) 4.60 (4.30, 5.10)
Insulin, µU/mL a Baseline 10.58 (6.24, 15.90) 8.98 (5.93, 12.34) −0.04 (−0.10, 0.01) 0.143
Week 12 9.39 (5.64, 15.33) 7.78 (5.59, 10.79)
Uric acid, mmol/L Baseline 328.07 (80.50) 337.08 (93.59) −10.36 (−19.39, −1.33) 0.025
Week 12 320.65 (74.85) 316.85 (76.49)
ALT, U/L a Baseline 28.75 (17.45, 44.50) 25.65 (15.90, 40.70) −0.04 (−0.08, 0.01) 0.150
Week 12 28.10 (21.15, 57.05) 24.30 (17.00–40.80)
AST, U/L a Baseline 23.60 (18.20, 31.35) 22.30 (17.90, 28.80) −0.01 (−0.05, 0.02) 0.539
Week 12 23.15 (18.90, 34.65) 21.75 (18.80–27.80)
Vitamin A, mg/L Baseline 1.04 (0.29) 1.01 (0.27) −0.01 (−0.05, 0.04) 0.738
Week 12 1.06 (0.25) 1.04 (0.22)
Vitamin B9, ng/mL Baseline 9.49 (5.06) 9.49 (5.05) 2.27 (1.37, 3.16) <0.0001
Week 12 11.71 (4.79) 13.98 (5.86)
Vitamin B12, pg/mL a Baseline 378.95 (284.07, 510.99) 357.84 (238.98, 461.68) 0.02 (−0.01, 0.04) 0.174
Week 12 369.20 (281.27, 506.65) 371.07 (275.55, 485.98)
Homocysteine, mmol/L Baseline 19.87 (7.36) 21.83 (8.42) −1.24 (−1.94, −0.54) 0.0005
Week 12 13.57 (3.93) 12.93 (4.02)
25(OH)D3 , ng/mL Baseline 29.81 (8.94) 28.15 (8.38) −0.23 (−1.08, 0.63) 0.602
Week 12 30.10 (6.35) 28.84 (6.88)
DHA, % Baseline 5.84 (1.15) 5.64 (1.07) −0.10 (−0.28, 0.08) 0.262
Week 12 5.88 (1.01) 5.66 (1.07)
EPA, % a Baseline 0.42 (0.32, 0.55) 0.37 (0.30, 0.49) 0.09 (0.05, 0.14) <0.0001
Week 12 0.49 (0.32, 0.70) 0.52 (0.38, 0.72)
Calcium, mmol/L Baseline 1.65 (0.12) 1.67 (0.10) 0.03 (0.004, 0.05) 0.023
Week 12 1.68 (0.13) 1.71 (0.10)
Magnesium, mmol/L Baseline 1.52 (0.15) 1.52 (0.13) 0.01 (−0.02, 0.03) 0.489
Week 12 1.54 (0.14) 1.54 (0.13)
Iron, mmol/L Baseline 8.62 (0.89) 8.70 (0.82) 0.07 (−0.04, 0.18) 0.205
Week 12 8.66 (0.70) 8.78 (0.71)
Zinc, µmol/L Baseline 98.37 (10.97) 100.80 (10.65) 1.59 (−0.39, 3.57) 0.115
Week 12 99.49 (10.21) 102.24 (10.33)
Copper, µmol/L Baseline 16.71 (1.91) 16.53 (1.89) −0.01 (−0.38, 0.37) 0.978
Week 12 16.87 (1.53) 16.84 (1.86)
Data are presented as mean (standard deviation), or median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile) for non-normal and highly skewed data.
Unless otherwise stated, intergroup difference at week 12 was evaluated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted for baseline values.
a Intergroup difference at week 12 was evaluated using ANCOVA on log10 of the original data, adjusted for baseline values. Difference of least squares (LS) mean and 95% confidence
(7). In the PREDICT1 study, a machine-learning model was These leading-edge studies shed new light on the personalized
created to predict both triglyceride and glycemic responses diet intervention. In a previous RCT on PN, changing dietary
to food intake for developing personalized diet strategies (4). intake to better align with the MedDiet—widely recognized as
TABLE 3 | Dietary intake and physical activity at baseline and week 12 in both groups.
Diet
Energy, kcal/d Baseline 1491.5 (1168.5, 1947.0) 1481.0 (1158.0, 1959.0) 0.485
Week 12 1481.5 (1137.0, 1905.0) 1411.0 (1079.0, 1767.0)
Whole grain, g/d Baseline 7.1 (0.0, 28.6) 8.6 (0.0, 28.6) <0.0001
Week 12 12.0 (0.0, 46.4) 35.7 (14.3, 57.1)
Vegetables, g/d Baseline 187.1 (111.8, 315.0) 191.4 (100.0, 365.7) <0.0001
Week 12 262.9 (162.1, 380.7) 323.4 (257.1, 402.9)
Dark green vegetables, g/d Baseline 128.6 (71.4, 214.3) 137.9 (64.3, 228.6) <0.0001
Week 12 201.8 (109.3, 296.4) 260.0 (194.3, 337.1)
Fruits, g/d Baseline 127.1 (57.1, 228.6) 107.1 (57.1, 200.0) <0.0001
Week 12 133.9 (56.4, 264.3) 221.4 (146.4, 303.6)
Dairy products, g/d Baseline 114.3 (34.3, 250.0) 142.9 (47.1, 235.7) 0.002
Week 12 128.6 (57.1, 242.9) 200.0 (85.7, 292.9)
Red meat, g/d Baseline 57.1 (28.6, 100.0) 64.3 (32.9, 114.3) 0.614
Week 12 57.1 (29.3, 392.9) 53.2 (32.1, 81.4)
Nuts, g/d Baseline 0 (0, 15.7) 0 (0, 214.3) 0.014
Week 12 0 (0, 13.6) 7.1 (0, 20.0)
Salt, g/d Baseline 8.0 (6.0, 10.0) 7.0 (5.0, 12.0) 0.484
Week 12 6.0 (5.0, 10.0) 6.0 (4.3, 8.0)
CDGI Baseline 55.7 (11.7) 55.7 (11.4) <0.0001
Week 12 58.6 (12.2) 67.0 (10.9)
Physical activity
Vigorous MET, min/w Baseline 0 (0, 480) 0 (0, 960) 0.0009
Week 12 0 (0, 0) 0 (0, 960)
Moderate MET, min/w Baseline 320 (0, 960) 360 (0, 1080) <0.0001
Week 12 240 (0, 840) 720 (240, 1680)
Walking MET, min/w Baseline 1386 (693, 2079) 1386 (693, 1485) 0.372
Week 12 1040 (693, 1601) 1386 (693, 1733)
Total MET, min/w Baseline 2418 (1386, 3359) 2127 (1215, 3564) <0.0001
Week 12 1695 (962, 3066) 2757 (1392, 4558)
Sitting duration, h/d Baseline 5 (0, 13) 5 (0, 13) 0.042
Week 12 5.75 (0, 12.5) 5 (0.08, 12)
Sleeping duration, h/d Baseline 7 (3, 12) 7 (3, 10) 0.389
Week 12 7 (1, 10) 7 (1, 10)
Data are presented as median (1st quartile, 3rd quartile) or mean (standard deviation).
Intergroup differences at week 12 were evaluated using Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test or ANCOVA adjusted for baseline values.
CDGI, China dietary guidelines index; MET, metabolic equivalents of task.
a healthy eating pattern—produced substantial health benefits modulating serum TG, TC, homocysteine, and folic acid, and
(8). The participants who received PN intervention consumed facilitating the decrease in BMI, body fat percentage and waist
less red meat, salt, and saturated fat, and had higher healthy circumference. This was within expectation since MVM offered a
eating index score (5). In our study, we observed similar dietary wide range of nutrients, which might generate synergistic effects
behavior changes in PNG, including increased consumption of in promoting health outcomes. MVM would be an optimal choice
whole grains, vegetables, especially dark green vegetables, fruits, for the overweight/obese adults who aim to lose weight.
dairy products, and nuts, and an improved CDGI, which again, In addition to diet, PA is another important modifiable
validated that PN intervention is more efficacious than the lifestyle factor included in PN intervention (32). Sedentary
conventional nutrition intervention. One of the novelties of the behavior and physical inactivity are among the leading modifiable
current study is the application of dietary supplements, especially risk factors worldwide for cardiovascular disease and all-cause
among the subjects with high risk of deficiencies. Among all mortality (33). For all-cause mortality, spending > 3–4 h/day in
the supplements, MVM displayed the most potent efficacy by watching television and > 6–8 h/day in any sitting activity have
FIGURE 4 | Spearman correlation with clustered clinical outcomes (anthropometric measurements and blood biomarkers) and supplement usage. Blue color
indicates strong reverse correlation; red color indicates strong positive correlation. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate
aminotransferase; BFP, body fat percentage; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; Cu, copper; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA,
eicosapentaenoic acid; Fe, iron; GLU, glucose; HCY, homocysteine; HDL, high density lipoprotein; INS, insulin; LDL, low density lipoprotein; Mg, magnesium; MVM,
multiple vitamin mineral; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; SBP, systolic blood pressure; Suppl, supplement; UA, uric acid; VA,
vitamin A; VB, vitamin B; VC, vitamin C; VD, vitamin D; VE, vitamin E; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; Zn, zinc.
been suggested as detrimental (34). Although the health benefits anthropometrics. For instance, BMI decrease was associated
of PA and exercise are evident, the research on personalized with the increase of moderate MET, and the intake of dietary
PA intervention is still limited. The Food4Me study showed vitamin B2, B6, and B12. The results suggested that our PN
that PA attenuated the effect of the FTO genotype on obesity intervention improved the clinical outcomes by changing the
traits in European adults (12). It is important to note that, subjects’ behavior. An important element to consider relating to
subjects in the CG and PNG recieved the exercise notifications the efficacy of PN intervention is the sustainability of behavior
at the same frequency, so the differences in MET were not change, or longer-term adherence to personalized diet and
due to the subjects’ awareness. Previous RCTs have shown that lifestyle recommendations (10). That would require a precise
tailored training, or personal training, are superior to untailored and validated algorithm, professional and trustworthy guidance
trainging in promoting PA (35, 36), potentially through changing from registered dietitian, and compassionate and sustainable
the participants’ attitudes in PA. In this case, the subjects communication with a service team.
in the PNG might feel more motivated when they read the According to several publications, the PN intervention
tailored notifications, which led to promoted PA duration and strategies that include genetic information have greater potential
intensity. These findings suggested the important contribution of than the ones based on the phenotype alone for improving health
individualized PA advice to PN intervention. (38–40). Adding a genetic component and disclosure of genetic
PN advice promotes changes in individual dietary and PA information may bring crisis awareness and improve motivation
behaviors, which may result in health or function improvement and compliance (38). In addition, people who carry risk alleles
(10). In the P100 study, specific recommendations based on may develop certain nutrient deficiency even when their intake
personal data were customized by a coach to help participants meets recommended levels (41, 42). Since the efficacy of diet
modify their behaviors, which potentially improved their clinical could be modulated or impaired by the SNPs of certain enzymes
biomarkers (37). The Food4Me study successfully led to health- (43), it is critical to apply dietary supplements among the
related behavioral changes but failed to bring significant population that are genetically at risk of deficiencies. Although
improvement in clinical outcomes (5). In our study, following the PN intervention effects on the changes in anthropometric
PN advice, the subjects improved their PA and nutrient intake, characteristics and blood biomarkers were similar for subjects
which was associated with the increase of beneficial nutrients with risk or non-risk allele of FTO, APOE, FADS1, and TCF7L2
in the blood and the decrease of “bad” blood biomarkers and genes, we still observed that subjects with a risk allele experienced
FIGURE 5 | Longitudinal correlation network of advice, genotype, lifestyles, and clinical outcomes. Connections were calculated by Spearman or Point-Biserial with
Benjamini-Hochberg-corrected P < 0.05 and then plotted as a network by Cytoscape. Nodes are colored according to (1) group of advice, including genetic risk
notification (e.g., FTO), lifestyle guidance (e.g., lose weight), and nutritional supplements (e.g., Suppl MVM), (2) change in lifestyles (diet and PA), and (3) change in
clinical outcomes (anthropometric measurements and blood biomarkers). Node sizes are proportional to betweenness centrality. Edge weights are proportional to the
correlation strength, and colors correspond to the direction of association (positive: red; negative: blue). Sub-network in top right shows an example of how “BMI”
change be associated with the advice, genotype, lifestyles, and clinical outcomes. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BFP, body fat
percentage; BMI, body mass index; Ca, calcium; Cu, copper; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; Fe, iron; GLU,
glucose; HCY, homocysteine; HDL, high density lipoprotein; I, iodine; LDL, low density lipoprotein; MET, metabolic equivalent of task; Mg, magnesium; MVM, multiple
vitamin mineral; Na, sodium; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SFA, saturated fatty acid; TC, total cholesterol; TG, triglycerides; UA, uric acid; VA, vitamin A; VB, vitamin B;
VC, vitamin C; VD, vitamin D; VE, vitamin E; WC, waist circumference; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio; Zn, zinc.
greater improvement in certain clinical outcomes. Follow up FTO polymorphisms affected weight loss. As an RNA N6 -
studies are warranted in the future to further explore the methyladenosine (m6 A) demethylase, the group of FTO proteins
association between genotype and PN intervention effect. are described as a regulator of m6 A level of hormones, such
As expected, the decrease of BMI was significantly associated as ghrelin, to modify energy intake and adipogenesis (23, 49).
with the “lose weight” advice, since a series of suggestions were In addition to FTO and MTHFR, TMPRSS6 polymorphism
provided under the “lose weight” node, which included dietary is another key genetic factor in the longitudinal correlation
changes and PA modifications, the most critical modifiable network. This is interesting since no evidence has shown that
lifestyle factors that are related to weight loss (44). The B TMPRSS6 affects energy metabolism. As reported, TMPRSS6
complex vitamins play an important role in maintaining energy genotype influences iron metabolism, and the mutations in
homeostasis. Vitamin B2, for example, is a vital cofactor within TMPRSS6 may lead to iron deficiency (27, 50). Previous studies
the electron transport chain, Krebs cycle, and beta-oxidation (fat have shown that a low iron level may result in exercise
burning) (45), which explained why the increased vitamin B2 intolerance, weakness, and impaired muscle strength (51, 52).
intake is a major contributor of BMI reduction. Vitamin B6 and Iron supplementation in the iron-depleted females significantly
vitamin B12 are involved in one-carbon metabolism, in which improved their progressive fatigue resistance during exercise
MTHFR plays a critical role (46). Although there is a lack of clear (53). Considering that the increase in moderate MET is one of the
evidence of how promoted one-carbon metabolism is related major contributors to BMI decrease, it is possible that the subjects
to weight loss, it is reported that vitamin B intake is positively with TMPRSS6 risk alleles may have experienced more fatigue
associated with fat-free mass in overweight/obese females (47), during exercises, which potentially affected their PA duration and
and according to a meta-analysis with 9,075 participants, higher intensity, and subsequently sabotaged their plan on weight loss.
serum vitamin B12 levels are inversely associated with obesity Admittedly, there are several limitations in this study. PN
(48). Expectedly, as the first identified obesity-related gene, intervention is a holistic and integrated solution, in which
continuous follow-up action and motivation are part of the intervention. PN intervention improved the clinical outcomes
whole PN intervention strategy to help the subjects achieve of anthropometric characteristics and blood biomarkers by
the goal (54). In this study, we cautiously designed the changing the dietary and PA behaviors of subjects. The approach
intervention of CG and PNG to minimize bias between the and the associated outcomes presented here open up the
groups. Nevertheless, we admit that the intensity of intervention possibility for positive health outcomes in a general population
cannot be completely consistent between the groups, which is should a similar program become widely available.
due to the nature of PN intervention (15, 54). Another limitation
is the lack of objective biomarkers for assessing adherence. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Unlike non-personalized dietary intervention trials, it is difficult
to identify certain objective biomarker(s) to fully indicate the The original contributions presented in the study are included
adherence in the personalized setting. As alternatives to objective in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be
biomarkers, CDGI, step count, and pill count were used in directed to the corresponding author/s.
our study to show the compliance of diet, PA, and nutritional
supplements, respectively. Previous studies have shown that
microbiota phenotypes might modulate physiological responses ETHICS STATEMENT
to diet, especially postprandial TG, glucose, and insulin (4,
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and
7). The analysis of “omics” data, such as metagenomics and
approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the
metabolomics data, may provide a broad perspective on the
Shanghai Nutrition Society. The participants provided their
changes of large sets of biomarkers (4, 55). In the near future,
written informed consent to participate in this study.
we will add more parameters to the PN report by including the
multi-omics data.
Our current study has advanced our knowledge from AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
previously published PN studies. It is important to note that
this is the first RCT in China that showed the health benefits JK, HG, and JD designed the research. JK, KX, and PW conducted
of PN intervention in overweight/obese adults, which provided the research. JN, FW, JC, and JZ analyzed the data. JK and
a model of framework for developing the personalized advice JC wrote the manuscript. JK, JC, MR, JN, FW, and JZ revised
that leads to modification of lifestyle and improvement of the manuscript. JD and HG had primary responsibility for final
clinical outcomes. In previous studies, nutritional supplements content. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
were usually neglected by investigators, even though taking
supplements is suggested when the residents are limiting dietary ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
intake (56), which leaves a major gap of knowledge in the study
of PN intervention. In contrast, we provided a holistic and We would like to thank Dr. Li Zhang and his colleagues from
integrated solution, containing both diet (supplements were used SPRIM China for their excellent work in coordinating the clinical
as a tool to fill the gap) and PA, to each individual in the PNG. trial. We also appreciate the kind help from Prof. John Mathers
Moreover, we combined two critical elements in the delivery of for providing Food4Me decision trees and Shanghai Nutrition
PN report: the validated decision trees as an algorithm to develop Society for providing support of registered dietitians. We thank
a PN report and the registered dietitians certificated to provide LetPub (www.letpub.com) for its linguistic assistance during the
the solution. Currently, we are coding the decision trees to preparation of this manuscript.
develop a mini application to carry out a real-world study, which
may expand our data sources and facilitate our understanding on SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
the efficacy of PN intervention in everyday environments.
In conclusion, we demonstrated that PN intervention The Supplementary Material for this article can be found
showed greater benefits to health status in overweight/obese online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2022.
Chinese adults compared with the benefits from conventional 919882/full#supplementary-material
REFERENCES 4. Berry SE, Valdes AM, Drew DA, Asnicar F, Mazidi M, Wolf J, et al. Human
postprandial responses to food and potential for precision nutrition. Nat Med.
1. Collaboration NRF. Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, (2020) 6:964–73. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0934-0
overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2,416 5. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Macready AL, Fallaize R,
population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, O’Donovan CB, et al. Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related
and adults. Lancet. (2017) 390:2627–42. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)32129-3 behaviour change: evidence from the Food4Me European randomized
2. Nyberg ST, Batty GD, Pentti J, Virtanen M, Alfredsson L, Fransson EI, et al. controlled trial. Int J Epidemiol. (2017) 46:578–88. doi: 10.1093/ije/d
Obesity and loss of disease-free years owing to major non-communicable yw186
diseases: a multicohort study. Lancet Public Health. (2018) 10:e490–7. 6. Westerman K, Reaver A, Roy C, Ploch M, Sharoni E, Nogal B,
doi: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30139-7 et al. Longitudinal analysis of biomarker data from a personalized
3. Hill JO, Wyatt HR, Peters JC. Energy balance and obesity. Circulation. (2012) nutrition platform in healthy subjects. Sci Rep. (2018) 8:14685.
126:126–32. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.111.087213 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33008-7
7. Zeevi D, Korem T, Zmora N, Israeli D, Rothschild D, Weinberger A, et al. 24. Fallaize R, Celis-Morales C, Macready AL, Marsaux CF, Forster H,
Personalized Nutrition by Prediction of Glycemic Responses. Cell. (2015) O’Donovan C, et al. The effect of the apolipoprotein E genotype on
163:1079–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.001 response to personalized dietary advice intervention: findings from the
8. Livingstone KM, Celis-Morales C, Navas-Carretero S, San-Cristobal R, Food4Me randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2016) 104:827–36.
Macready AL, Fallaize R, et al. Effect of an Internet-based, personalized doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.135012
nutrition randomized trial on dietary changes associated with the 25. Li L, Wang J, Ping Z, Li Y, Wang C, Shi Y, Zhou W, Zhang L.
Mediterranean diet: the Food4Me study. Am J Clin Nutr. (2016) 104:288–97. Interaction analysis of gene variants of TCF7L2 and body mass index
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.129049 and waist circumference on type 2 diabetes. Clin Nutr. (2020) 39:192–7.
9. Palmnäs M, Brunius C, Shi L, Rostgaard-Hansen A, Torres NE, González- doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.01.014
Domínguez R, et al. Perspective: metabotyping-A potential personalized 26. Kapur K, Johnson T, Beckmann ND, Sehmi J, Tanaka T, Kutalik Z,
nutrition strategy for precision prevention of cardiometabolic disease. Adv et al. Genome-wide meta-analysis for serum calcium identifies significantly
Nutr. (2020) 11:524–32. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz121 associated SNPs near the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene. PLoS Genet.
10. Adams SH, Anthony JC, Carvajal R, Chae L, Khoo CSH, Latulippe ME, (2010) 6:e1001035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001035
et al. Perspective: guiding principles for the implementation of personalized 27. Gan W, Guan Y, Wu Q, An P, Zhu J, Lu L, et al. Association of
nutrition approaches that benefit health and function. Adv Nutr. (2020) TMPRSS6 polymorphisms with ferritin, hemoglobin, and type 2 diabetes
11:25–34. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz086 risk in a Chinese Han population. Am J Clin Nutr. (2012) 95:626–32.
11. Celis-Morales C, Marsaux CF, Livingstone KM, Navas-Carretero S, San- doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.025684
Cristobal R, Fallaize R, et al. Can genetic-based advice help you lose 28. Nissen J, Vogel U, Ravn-Haren G, Andersen EW, Madsen KH, Nexø BA,
weight? Findings from the Food4Me European randomized controlled et al. Common variants in CYP2R1 and GC genes are both determinants
trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2017) 105(5):1204–13. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.14 of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations after UVB irradiation and
5680 after consumption of vitamin D3-fortified bread and milk during winter in
12. Celis-Morales C, Marsaux CF, Livingstone KM, Navas-Carretero S, San- Denmark. Am J Clin Nutr. (2015) 101:218–27. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.092148
Cristobal R, O’Donovan C B, et al. Physical activity attenuates the effect of 29. Nutrition and Health Status Report for Chinese Residents (2010–2013).
the FTO genotype on obesity traits in European adults: the Food4Me study. Metabolic Syndrome. Gangqiang D, Yuna H, editors.: Beijing: People’s
Obesity. (2016):962–9. doi: 10.1002/oby.21422 Medical Publishing House. (2018).
13. Yang Y, Yang X, Zhai F, Guo J, Su Y. Chinese Dietary Reference Intakes. Beijing: 30. de Roos B. Personalised nutrition: ready for practice? Proc Nutr Soc. (2013)
Science Press (2013). p. 649-660 (Society CN, editor.). 72:48–52. doi: 10.1017/s0029665112002844
14. Zhu J, Gao R, Zhao S, Lu G, Zhao D, Jianjun L. Guidelines for the 31. Cordain L, Eaton SB, Sebastian A, Mann N, Lindeberg S, Watkins BA, et al.
prevention and treatment of dyslipidemia in Chinese adults (revised in Origins and evolution of the Western diet: health implications for the 21st
2016). Chin Circ J. (2016) 31:937–53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3614.2016. century. Am J Clin Nutr. (2005) 81:341–54. doi: 10.1093/ajcn.81.2.341
10.001 32. Ezzati M, Riboli E. Behavioral and dietary risk factors for noncommunicable
15. Celis-Morales C, Livingstone KM, Marsaux CF, Forster H, O’Donovan diseases. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369:954–64. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1203528
CB, Woolhead C, et al. Design and baseline characteristics of the 33. Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary
Food4Me study: a web-based randomised controlled trial of personalised Behavior, Exercise, and Cardiovascular Health. Circ Res. (2019) 124:799–15.
nutrition in seven European countries. Genes Nutr. (2015) 2:450. doi: 10.1161/circresaha.118.312669
doi: 10.1007/s12263-014-0450-2 34. Patterson R, McNamara E, Tainio M, de Sá TH, Smith AD, Sharp
16. Arija V, Villalobos F, Pedret R, Vinuesa A, Jovani D, Pascual G, Basora J. SJ, et al. Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and
Physical activity, cardiovascular health, quality of life and blood pressure cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review
control in hypertensive subjects: randomized clinical trial. Health Qual Life and dose response meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. (2018) 33:811–29.
Outcomes. (2018) 16:184. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-1008-6 doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
17. Patterson E. Guidelines for Data Processing and Analysis of the International 35. McClaran SR. The effectiveness of personal training on changing attitudes
Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)-Short and Long Forms (2005). towards physical activity. J Sports Sci Med. (2003) 2:10–4.
Available online at: https://biobank.ndph.ox.ac.uk/showcase/ukb/docs/ipaq_ 36. Marcus BH, Emmons KM, Simkin-Silverman LR, Linnan LA, Taylor ER,
analysis.pdf Bock BC, et al. Evaluation of motivationally tailored vs. standard self-help
18. Huang L, Wang H, Wang Z, Zhang J, Zhang B, Ding G. Regional disparities physical activity interventions at the workplace. Am J Health Promot. (1998)
in the association between cereal consumption and metabolic syndrome: 12:246–53. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-12.4.246
results from the china health and nutrition survey. Nutrients. (2019) 11:764. 37. Price ND, Magis AT, Earls JC, Glusman G, Levy R, Lausted C, et al. A wellness
doi: 10.3390/nu11040764 study of 108 individuals using personal, dense, dynamic data clouds. Nat
19. Huang F, Wang Z, Wang L, Wang H, Zhang J, Du W, et al. Evaluating Biotechnol. (2017) 35:747–56. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3870
adherence to recommended diets in adults 1991–2015: revised China dietary 38. Arkadianos I, Valdes AM, Marinos E, Florou A, Gill RD, Grimaldi KA.
guidelines index. Nutr J. (2019) 18:70. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0498-3 Improved weight management using genetic information to personalize a
20. Lietz G, Oxley A, Leung W, Hesketh J. Single nucleotide polymorphisms calorie controlled diet. Nutr J. (2007) 6:29. doi: 10.1186/1475-2891-6-29
upstream from the β-carotene 15,15’-monoxygenase gene influence 39. Nielsen DE, El-Sohemy A. Disclosure of genetic information and change in
provitamin A conversion efficiency in female volunteers. J Nutr. (2012) dietary intake: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e112665.
142:161s−5s. doi: 10.3945/jn.111.140756 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112665
21. Steluti J, Carvalho AM, Carioca AAF, Miranda A, Gattás GJF, Fisberg 40. Hietaranta-Luoma HL, Tahvonen R, Iso-Touru T, Puolijoki H, Hopia A. An
RM, Marchioni DM. Genetic Variants involved in one-carbon metabolism: intervention study of individual, apoE genotype-based dietary and physical-
polymorphism frequencies and differences in homocysteine concentrations activity advice: impact on health behavior. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics. (2014)
in the folic acid fortification era. Nutrients. (2017) 9:539. doi: 10.3390/nu90 7:161–74. doi: 10.1159/000371743
60539 41. Rivera-Paredez B, Macías N, Martínez-Aguilar MM, Hidalgo-Bravo A, Flores
22. Roke K, Mutch DM. The role of FADS1/2 polymorphisms on cardiometabolic M, Quezada-Sánchez AD, et al. Association between Vitamin D deficiency and
markers and fatty acid profiles in young adults consuming fish single nucleotide polymorphisms in the Vitamin D receptor and GC genes and
oil supplements. Nutrients. (2014) 6:2290–304. doi: 10.3390/nu60 analysis of their distribution in mexican postmenopausal women. Nutrients.
62290 (2018) 10:1175. doi: 10.3390/nu10091175
23. Huang T, Qi Q, Li Y, Hu FB, Bray GA, Sacks FM, Williamson DA, Qi L. FTO 42. Liu CS, Chen CH, Chiang HC, Kuo CL, Huang CS, Cheng WL, et al. B-
genotype, dietary protein, and change in appetite: the preventing overweight group vitamins, MTHFR C677T polymorphism and carotid intima-media
using novel dietary strategies trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2014) 99:1126–30. thickness in clinically healthy subjects. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2007) 61:996–1003.
doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.082164 doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602606
43. Moran NE, Thomas-Ahner JM, Fleming JL, McElroy JP, Mehl R, Grainger 53. Brutsaert TD, Hernandez-Cordero S, Rivera J, Viola T, Hughes G,
EM, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in β-Carotene Oxygenase Haas JD. Iron supplementation improves progressive fatigue resistance
1 are associated with plasma lycopene responses to a tomato-soy juice during dynamic knee extensor exercise in iron-depleted, non-anemic
intervention in men with prostate cancer. J Nutr. (2019) 149:381–97. women. Am J Clin Nutr. (2003) 77:441–8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy304 2.441
44. Management. IoMUSoMW. Weight Management: State of the Science and 54. Contento IR. Nutrition education: linking research, theory, and practice. Asia
Opportunities for Military Programs. Washington (DC): National Academies Pac J Clin Nutr. (2008) 17(Suppl 1):176–9.
Press (US); 2004. (4, Weight-Loss and Maintenance Strategies.). Available 55. Chen R, Mias GI, Li-Pook-Than J, Jiang L, Lam HY, Chen R, et al.
online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK221839/ Personal omics profiling reveals dynamic molecular and medical
45. LeMond G, Hom M. 5 - Mitochondrial Supplements. In: LeMond G, Hom M, phenotypes. Cell. (2012) 148:1293–307. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.
editors. The Science of Fitness. Boston: Academic Press (2015). p. 65–70. 02.009
46. Niforou A, Konstantinidou V, Naska A. Genetic variants shaping inter- 56. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human
individual differences in response to dietary intakes-a narrative review of the Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2020–2025. 9th ed. (2020).
case of vitamins. Front Nutr. (2020) 7:558598. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.558598 Available online at: https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/resources/2020-2025-
47. Rodríguez-Rodríguez E, López-Sobaler AM, Navarro AR, Bermejo LM, dietary-guidelines-online-materials
Ortega RM, Andrés P. Vitamin B6 status improves in overweight/obese
women following a hypocaloric diet rich in breakfast cereals, and Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that this study received funding from
may help in maintaining fat-free mass. Int J Obes. (2008) 32:1552–8. Amway. The funder was not involved in the study design, collection, analysis,
doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.131 interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for
48. Sun Y, Sun M, Liu B, Du Y, Rong S, Xu G, Snetselaar LG, Bao W. publication.
Inverse association between serum vitamin B12 concentration and obesity
among adults in the United States. Front Endocrinol. (2019) 10:414–14. Publisher’s Note: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors
doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00414 and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of
49. Karra E, O’Daly OG, Choudhury AI, Yousseif A, Millership S, Neary MT, et al.
the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in
A link between FTO, ghrelin, and impaired brain food-cue responsivity. J Clin
this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or
Invest. (2013) 123:3539–51. doi: 10.1172/JCI44403
50. Finberg KE, Heeney MM, Campagna DR, Aydinok Y, Pearson HA, Hartman endorsed by the publisher.
KR, et al. Mutations in TMPRSS6 cause iron-refractory iron deficiency anemia
(IRIDA). Nat Genet. (2008) 40:569–71. doi: 10.1038/ng.130 Copyright © 2022 Kan, Ni, Xue, Wang, Zheng, Cheng, Wu, Runyon, Guo and Du.
51. Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, van Assen S. Exercise-induced anaemia: a forgotten This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons
cause of iron deficiency anaemia in young adults. Br J Gen Pract. (2015) Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums
65:268–9. doi: 10.3399/bjgp15X685069 is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited
52. Neidlein S, Wirth R, Pourhassan M. Iron deficiency, fatigue and muscle and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted
strength and function in older hospitalized patients. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2021) academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not
75:456–63. doi: 10.1038/s41430-020-00742-z comply with these terms.