Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 21 views

    Anticipatry Bail Nishu

    Uploaded by

    Advocate Siddharth Singh
    Bail

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Anticipatry Bail Nishu

    Uploaded by

    Advocate Siddharth Singh
    21 views6 pages
    Bail

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Bail

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    21 views6 pages

    Anticipatry Bail Nishu

    Uploaded by

    Advocate Siddharth Singh
    Bail

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    You are on page 1of 6

    IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE

    KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI

    IN RE:

    STATE VERSUS NISHU


    S/O SH. SURENDER SINGH
    R/O. 3/16, MAIN ROAD,
    MOUJPUR, DELHI-110053

    FIR NO. 0661/2018


    U/S 308/34 IPC
    P.S. JAFRABAD

    APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF APPLCIANT FOR GRANT OF


    ANTICIPATRY BAIL U/S. 438 Cr.P.C. TO THE
    APPLCIANT/ACCUSED.

    MOST RESPECTFULLY SHOWETH:

    1.That the applicant/accused is residing above

    mentioned address and have clean antecedent

    and nothing involve any criminal activity.

    2.That the said FIR has been registered on the

    bases of complaint made by the younger brother

    of father of accused and both the complainant

    and accused belongs to the same family and

    residing together in the same locality.

    3.That the complainant and his son beaten to the

    father of accused and accused made a 100

    number call and concerned police registered an

    FIR bearing no. 0660/2018 dated 11.11.2018

    U/s. 323/341/506/34 IPC against the


    complainant Sanjay and complainant son namely

    Aman and during the course of quarreling

    between both the parties complainant also made

    a complaint before concerned police station

    and another FIR registered against the present

    applicant and his father and his younger

    brother. Copy of both the FIR attached with

    this application.

    4.That as per the content of the FIR bearing no.

    0661/2018 the complainant Sanjya, got an

    injuries during the course of quarreling

    between both the parties, and concerned police

    station registered an FIR U/s. 308/34 IPC

    whereas the injury got by the Sanjay during

    the course of quarrelling between the parties

    is simple which is clearly reflected in MLC

    No. C/6016/46/18 and MLC No. B-5767/37/18 in

    the name of Aman.

    5.That as per the both the MLCs the injuries are

    simple and the offence U/s. 308 is not made

    out against the present applicant.

    6.That there are more then one month has been

    gone neither the present applicant nor any

    accused person temper the evidence or


    investigation conducted by the concerned

    police.

    7.That the police officials of P.S. Jafrabad

    were falsely implicated the applicant in the

    present case as the applicant has no concerned

    with the alleged.

    8.That the applicant undertakes to appear on

    each and every date of hearing in future.

    9.That the applicant/accused is law abiding and

    peace loving citizen of his locality and

    residing at the above said address since long.

    10. That the applicant is never involve in any

    case and is ready to furnished the reliable

    surety for satisfaction of this Hon’ble Court.

    PRAYER

    It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed

    that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to

    grant the anticipatory Bail of the

    applicant/accused, in the interest of justice.

    It is prayed accordingly.

    DELHI APPLICANT/ACCUSED
    DATED:21.12.2018
    THROUGH

    (SUNIL PRASAD)
    ADVOCATE
    IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE
    KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI

    IN RE:

    STATE VERSUS NISHU

    MEMO OF PARTIES

    NISHU
    S/O SH. SURENDER SINGH
    R/O. 3/16, MAIN ROAD,
    MOUJPUR, DELHI-110053 APPLICANT

    VERSUS

    STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI RESPONDENT

    DELHI APPLICANT/ACCUSED

    DATED-21.12.2018 THROUGH

    SUNIL PRASAD

    ADVOCATE
    IN THE COURT OF HON’BLE DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE
    KARKARDOOMA COURTS, DELHI

    IN RE:

    STATE VERSUS NISHU

    INDEX

    S.NO. PARTICULAR PAGE NO.

    1. MEMO OF PARTIES

    2.

    APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF

    APPLCIANT FOR GRANT OF

    ANTICIPATRY BAIL U/S. 438

    Cr.P.C. TO THE

    APPLCIANT/ACCUSED.

    3. COPY OF BOTH THE FIR.

    4. VAKALATNAMA
    DELHI APPLICANT/ACCUSED
    DATED THROUGH

    SUNIL PRASAD

    ADVOCATE

    You might also like