Critical Analysis

Critical Analysis
Analysis of a specific artifact is called critical analysis or critique. This is typically a process of
developing a line of interpretation, or a “reading,” and of identifying the interrelated parts of the text
that are meaningful.
There’s a lot of shared ground between rhetorical and critical analysis—by some accounts, they’re
essentially the same thing. One difference is the starting point of each kind of analysis: While
rhetorical analysis emphasizes the relationship between the author, context, and reader, critical
analysis starts from the elements of the text itself. The most important part of critical analysis (and
really any textual analysis) is a reading strategy called “close reading.”
Close Reading
Close reading focuses on significant details or patterns in a text. The goal is to develop a deep,
precise understanding of the text’s relationship to your purpose, topic, or field of study. Note that
there’s a difference between close reading and simply reading a text carefully. If reading is like
digging a hole, close reading is more like an archeological dig. Using special tools and a systematic
approach, close reading scrapes away various layers of meaning to find new patterns and buried
significance within a text.
At the beginning of your close reading, your greatest asset is time; therefore, you should slow down.
Analyzing a text is a multi-stage process and finding evidence from a text is the very beginning of that
process.
You should not jump immediately to your thesis; instead, you need to gather complex
evidence by reading slowly with a pencil in hand. You should take this time to annotate the
text you are reading with your observations and initial interpretations.
Make a note of things that are interesting, confusing, or repeated. When your task is to analyze a text,
resist the need to jump in and begin drafting your thesis right away. Instead, to ensure you will
eventually make an argument of adequate complexity, you should devote the time necessary to
examine the text thoroughly.
To examine a text closely, you should:
1. Annotate your experience

2. Take notice
3. Be granular
1. Annotate your experience
You will always begin by reading with a pen in hand, writing in the margins, underlining, highlighting
and otherwise marking on the text, if you own the text, or by taking notes on a separate piece of
paper if you are borrowing the text. You can draw arrows in the margins to link different parts of the
text as a way of following the author’s logic and argument. If you are reading online, you should get in
the habit of annotating your reading experience in some way. You can do this on paper, or with a
digital text editor or PDF editor which allow you to highlight and make notes or
comments. Hypothes.is is a free general purpose web and PDF annotator that you can use for that
purpose.
2. Take notice
During your first reading of a text, you should be looking for elements that jump out at you, that you
think are interesting or puzzling, or that you think may need more attention in a second reading.
Underline or highlight words you do not understand, then seek out definitions for those words. If you
encounter a word that is new to you, it is likely that the word is significant to the central message or
theme of the text.
3. Be granular
Reading critically requires being granular. It is not enough to just flag whole sentences or even whole
paragraphs. You must get down to the level of the word. Begin by looking for some straightforward
clues:
 What’s interesting? What’s strange?

What words and phrases catch your attention in your first reading? This may take the
form of repetitions; if a word or phrase is repeated, it is likely central to the author’s
purpose.
 What words or phrases are new to you?
You will probably encounter words or phrases that you have never read or heard before.
You may also encounter facts or concepts that you are learning for the first time. That’s
great! Make a note of them and then look them up, or seek out additional information.
 What patterns are present?
What elements of the argument repeat? A common pattern is the use of synonyms or
words that are similar thematically. If there are several synonyms or thematic terms, it is
likely the author is focusing on a specific idea or argument that can be conveyed using
these words. You might also consider larger sets of words. For example, if an author is
using verbs like “flow” and “poured,” nouns like “ocean” and “river” and adjectives like
“wet” or “fluid,” you might note that there are a lot of water-related words. Three or more
words in a list of synonyms or thematically-related words or phrases probably indicates a
pattern.
 What contrasts or opposites are present?
Are there words that are opposites or words understood to be contrasts of one another?
The author may use these to establish the main argument by comparing points or
establishing a counter argument. It may also be that the author is offering a more
nuanced approach to a subject, so it’s important to look for subtle or implied
contrasts that are not as stark as good/bad, black/white. For example, an author might
use the word “infantilize” and then later “adult”—while the author does not juxtapose the
words side by side, the two words are opposites and may be clues about the author’s
larger argument.

Critical Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Critical Analysis

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Critical Analysis

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Critical Analysis

To examine a text closely, you should:

1. Annotate your experience

1. Annotate your experience

 What’s interesting? What’s strange?

You might also like