Gov Uscourts Cand 433105 1 0
Gov Uscourts Cand 433105 1 0
Gov Uscourts Cand 433105 1 0
11
TESLA, INC., Case No.
12
Plaintiff, COMPLAINT FOR:
13
v. 1. Federal False Advertising (15 U.S.C. §
14 1125(a)(1)(B))
15 EVJECT, INC. 2. Federal Trademark Dilution (15 U.S.C.
§ 1125(c))
16 Defendant. 3. Violation of California Bus. & Prof.
Code § 17500
17 4. Violation of California Bus. & Prof.
Code § 17200
18
19
20
Plaintiff Tesla, Inc. (“Tesla”), by way of its Original Complaint against EVject, Inc.,
21
(“EVject”) states and alleges as follows:
22
23
NATURE OF ACTION
24
1. Plaintiff Tesla owns and operates the Supercharger network, the largest and most
25
reliable DC fast charging network for electric vehicles in North America. Tesla’s Superchargers
26
make up three out of four 100kW fast chargers in North America. The charging connector used by
27
Superchargers and Tesla vehicles was originally a proprietary connector developed by Tesla.
28 PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 2 of 22
2 standard, called the North America Charging Standard (“NACS”). Today, the NACS standard is
3 governed by the Society of Automotive Engineers (“SAE”) and is formally known as NACS SAE
4 J3400. NACS has been adopted in North America by all large automakers, charging equipment
5 manufacturers, and charging station operators, with new vehicles and charging equipment
7 3. Defendant EVject promotes, sells, and distributes a dangerous product intended for
8 use on Tesla’s Supercharging network. Although advertised as “safe[]” and “works seamlessly
9 with [an] electric vehicle’s built-in safety systems,” Defendant’s dangerous product is sold as a
10 NACS “breakaway charging connector” marketed to electric vehicle owners who want to charge
11 their Tesla vehicle at Tesla’s Supercharger network and “easily escape,” without leaving their
12 vehicle (hereinafter “EVject Escape Connector”). See https://evject.com (“EVject is the only EV
13 charging connector that allows you to safely disconnect and drive away in an emergency situation
14 - without ever leaving your vehicle. Our patented breakaway technology works seamlessly with
15 your electric vehicle’s built-in safety systems, giving you the peace of mind to charge anywhere,
17 4. Plaintiff has conducted an analysis of the EVject Escape Connector and concluded
18 that Defendant’s EVject Escape Connector poses a high safety risk and foreseeably causes
19 catastrophic injury to purchasers of the EVject Escape Connector, the public at large and/or causes
21 5. Defendant on its own website identifies “KNOWN ISSUES,” including, but not
22 limited to, “Car Body Interference,” “Charge Port Flange Gap,” and that the “EVject [Escape
23 Connector] may get hot during Cybertruck [charging] sessions from 0-25%.” See
25 6. Plaintiff has taken all reasonable actions and efforts to alert Defendant to the risk of
26 harm and after exhausting efforts, seeks civil relief from this Court.
27
28 2
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 3 of 22
1 PARTIES
1
2 FACTUAL BACKGROUND
28 4
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 5 of 22
28 5
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 6 of 22
18
19 T Design 04/12 7055039 05/16/20 26 (26) Belt buckles.
/2022 23
20
21 T Design 02/15 6322825 04/13/20 28 (28) Model cars; toy cars; toy
/2019 21 vehicles; toy vehicle play sets and
22 accessories therefor; miniature toy
models of vehicles, diecast toy
23 vehicle models; scale size collector
toy model vehicles.
T Design 07/17 4901891 02/16/20 39 (39) Leasing of motor vehicles.
24 /2015 16
25
26
27
28 6
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 7 of 22
5
6 TESLA 04/17 4554429 06/24/20 09 (09) Batteries to supply electric
/2013 14 power to motors for electric
vehicles; wall-mounted electric
7 power connector to charge electric
automobiles; mobile plug-in electric
8 power connector to charge electric
automobiles; downloadable software
9 in the nature of a mobile application
for monitoring electric charge and
status of vehicles and remote control
10 of vehicle; downloadable software
in the nature of vehicle operating
11 system software.
TESLA 02/11 6289537 03/09/20 09, (09) Wirelessly connected electric
12 /2015 21 36, battery apparatus with embedded
40, remotely updateable software and
42 firmware for storage and discharge
13 of stored electricity for usage in
dwellings and buildings; wirelessly
14 connected electric battery apparatus
with embedded remotely updateable
15 software and firmware for storing,
and discharging stored electricity
supplied by or to an electric power
16 grid or other source of electric
power generation for stabilizing and
17 meeting electricity demands and
usage goals; computer software for
18 monitoring, optimizing and
regulating the storage, and discharge
of stored energy to and from such
19 wirelessly connected electric battery
apparatus. (36) Financing services
20 relating to wirelessly connected
electric battery apparatus with
21 embedded remotely updateable
software and firmware for the
storage, and discharge of stored
22 electricity for stabilizing and
meeting electricity demands and
23 usage goals. (40) Leasing of
wirelessly connected electric battery
24 apparatus with embedded remotely
updateable software and firmware
25 for the storage, and discharge of
stored electricity for stabilizing and
meeting electricity demands and
26 usage goals. (42) Monitoring of
wirelessly connected electric battery
27 apparatus with embedded firmware
28 7
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 8 of 22
28 8
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 9 of 22
28 9
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 10 of 22
28 10
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 11 of 22
28 11
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 12 of 22
1 stations are primarily located in three regions: Asia Pacific (over 2,650), North America (over
3 24. In 2024, Tesla plans to spend over $500M USD expanding the Supercharger
6 25. Tesla Superchargers make up three out of four fast chargers and have set the
7 standard for EV charging in North America. This standard, known as the North American
8 Charging Standard (“NACS”), has been adopted by all large automakers, with manufacturers and
10 26. Until recently, Tesla’s Supercharger network was exclusive to drivers of Tesla’s
11 Model S vehicle, Model X vehicle, Model 3 vehicle, Model Y vehicle, and Cybertruck vehicle. To
12 encourage adoption, Tesla has now opened up its fast-charging network to allow more electric
13 vehicle drivers to charge at over 15,000 Supercharging stalls across North America.
14 27. As of January 2024, most automakers in North America have pledged to switch to
15 the North American Charging Standard (NACS). In February of 2024, Ford became the first
16 automaker to offer a NACS adapter to customers, allowing Ford vehicles to charge with the
19 28. On information and belief, Defendant is engaged in e-commerce through its own
20 website, as well as through third-party e-commerce platforms, e.g., Amazon.com, EVANNEX, and
21 Shopify. See, e.g., https://evject.com/products/evject (offering for sale EVject Escape Connector,
22 “Designed to fit EVs and chargers with NACS connectors” and “Works with Level 1, 2, and DC
23 fast charging,” for $299.00 USD, in Style: NACS to NACS; CCS1 to CCS1; and CCS2 to CCS2)
25 for-tesla-owners (offering for sale “EVject Breakaway Charging Adapters for Tesla Owners”)
27
28 13
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 14 of 22
1 29. Through e-commerce, Defendant has made and continues to make false or
2 misleading statements concerning the safety and compatibility of its EVject Escape Connector on
3 marketing materials. Specifically, the EVject Escape Connector website falsely advertises the
5 a) We specifically engineered the EVject and tested it to deliver safety you can count
6 on, including integration with your EV’s built-in systems. We’re proud to say
8 b) The first iteration of the EVject is currently built exclusively for NACS-enabled
9 vehicles.
11 allowing you to fully stop the charging current from the safety of your car. Once
12 you hit “Unlock Charge Port” on your dashboard, the flow of electricity stops, and
13 you are safe to drive away without ever leaving your car. The EVject device will
14 break in two, leaving one half to protect the charging wand as it falls to the ground,
17 The statements as to safety and compatibility are false. See Exhibit “A” to Complaint.
19 e-commerce platform, which are likely to mislead a prospective purchaser: “NACS Vehicle
20 Compatibility: Fully compatible with all NACS vehicles, including [Tesla’s] Cybertruck, Model Y,
22 31. Defendant EVject’s statement that the design is “[f]ully compatible with all NACS
23 vehicles” implies to any reasonable consumer a material factual assertion of safety, which is false.
25
26
27 1
See Exhibit B to Complaint.
28 14
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 15 of 22
1 32. A customer(s) on Amazon.com publicly reviewed and criticized the EVject Escape
2 Connector:
3 “I have a 2022 Model y. I tried the EVject Tesla connector on both a v3 supercharger and a
4 j1772 level 2 charger and multiple tries the Tesla says charging cable is still connect when
8 33. Plaintiff requested and paid for a third-party engineering team to conduct a design
9 review, physical teardown, precision measurement, microscopy, and CT imaging of the EVject
10 Escape Connector for analysis against relevant charging connector standard(s), J3400.
11 34. Plaintiff alleges the EVject Escape Connector’s design and construction poses a
12 high safety risk. For purposes of this analysis “high safety risk” means a major injury, fatality or
13 fire is expected to occur during the lifetime of the device, for which no controls exist.
14 35. Plaintiff alleges that the EVject Escape Connector poses a high safety risk for at
17 construction. In the event of an over-temperature condition in the Connector, the lack of over-
18 temperature protection creates a safety risk. Testing of high-current simulated charging through the
19 Connector, utilized in conjunction with a Tesla Supercharger cable and Tesla EV charge port,
20 demonstrated that surface temperatures of the Connector may reach as high as 100C, after 30
21 minutes of charging at 420 ADC. During an over-temperature event, a user of the Connector may be
22 burned during (or following) charging by touching or grabbing the Connector. Additionally, the
23 high temperature present in the Connector poses a risk of fire and ignition of other combustible
24 materials in the charger cable, the vehicle connected to the Connector, and the Supercharger
25 infrastructure.
27 on the connector side that are susceptible to deformation or splaying during normal course of use,
28 15
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 16 of 22
1 which could introduce a resistive connection and pose a risk of excessive heating during charging.
2 This buildup of heat at a degraded electrical connection can continue to increase if over-temperature
4 (c) standard J3400 specifies that the DC charging receptacles on the connector
5 side shall be cylindrical in shape. By contrast, on the Connector they are conically shaped. An
6 abnormal receptacle shape may not achieve proper mating with sufficient surface area to ensure a
1 activities shall be liable to a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is likely to be
4 compatible with Plaintiff’s Supercharger network, are material and made in interstate commerce
5 through at least online e-commerce stores. The engineering design, manufacture and performance
6 of high-voltage electrical equipment intended for daily use are of paramount importance to
8 40. Defendant’s false and misleading statements have injured Plaintiff and/or such
9 injury is imminent. For example, through Defendant’s false and misleading commercial
10 statements, including, but not limited to, statements concerning the components and safety of
11 Defendant’s EVject Escape Connector, users had the capacity of being misled or materially
12 deceived, or indeed were misled or materially deceived, into purchasing Defendant’s Escape
15 high risk of suffering injury to person or property, and Plaintiff’s Supercharging network has or
16 will be imminently damaged by such use, thus directly or proximately causing economic and
19 Lanham Act violations, a disgorgement of profits made by Defendant on sales of its product,
21 42. Defendant’s acts are willful, wanton and calculated to deceive and mislead, and are
22 undertaken in bad faith, making this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to recover additional
24 43. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant’s acts will irreparably injure Plaintiff’s
25 goodwill and erode its market share. Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1116, Plaintiff is entitled to
27
28 17
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________
Case 4:24-cv-04482-JST Document 1 Filed 07/24/24 Page 18 of 22
1 50. Due to the acts of Defendant, Plaintiff has suffered and will continue to suffer loss
2 of income, profits, and valuable business opportunities, and, if not restrained, Defendant have
3 unfairly derived and will continue to unfairly derive income, profits and business opportunities as
5 51. As the acts alleged herein constitute willful violations of Section 43(c) of the
6 Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), and, as Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law, Plaintiff is
7 entitled to injunctive relief under 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a), as well as to Defendant’s profits and other
8 remedies provided by 15 U.S.C. §§ 1117 and 1118, and reasonable attorney’s fees and
2 the trial herein but not less than $75,000 and, unless enjoined by this Court, Defendant’s conduct
3 will continue to cause Plaintiff irreparable damage for which Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at
4 law.
5 58. Pursuant to CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 17535, Plaintiff seeks an order of this
6 Court compelling the Defendant to provide restitution, and to disgorge the monies to which
7 Plaintiff is entitled but were instead collected and realized by Defendant as a result of its false and
8 misleading statements and injunctive relief enjoining Defendant from making such false and
9 misleading statements.
1 62. Pursuant to CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE § 17203, Plaintiff seeks an order of this
2 Court compelling the Defendant to provide restitution, and to disgorge the monies to which
3 Plaintiff is entitled but were instead collected and realized by Defendant as a result of its false and
4 misleading statements and injunctive relief enjoining Defendant from making such false and
5 misleading statements.
1 (d) an order prohibiting importation of the EVject Escape Connector into the
2 United States or admitted to entry at any customhouse of the United States as consistent with the
4 (e) an order granting Plaintiff such other relief as the Court may deem
5 appropriate to prevent the trade and public from deriving any erroneous impression concerning the
9 unlawful acts;
11 Plaintiff’s actual and consequential damages resulting from Defendant’s false and misleading
12 advertisements and marketing and pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a), CAL. BUS. & PROF. CODE
13 §§ 17500 et. seq., and the common law of the State of California; and
14 (h) an order awarding Plaintiff such other and further relief as the Court deems
17 Plaintiff, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, requests a trial by jury of
18 any issues so triable by right.
19 Dated: July 24, 2024
20
By: /s/ Louis Dorny
21 A. Louis Dorny
22
Attorney for Plaintiff
23 TESLA, INC.
24
25
26
27
28 22
PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
FEDERAL FALSE ADVERTISING, TRADEMARK DILUTION,
& CALIF. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 & 17500
Case No. ______________