PSA 210 Redrafted
PSA 210 Redrafted
PSA 210 Redrafted
CONTENTS Paragraph Introduction Scope of this PSA....................................................................................................... Effective Date............................................................................................................. Objective.................................................................................................................... Definitions.................................................................................................................. Requirements Preconditions for an Audit......................................................................................... Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms................................................................... Recurring Audits........................................................................................................ Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement.............................. Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance............................................. Application and Other Explanatory Material Scope of this PSA...................................................................................................... Preconditions for an Audit......................................................................................... Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms.................................................................. Recurring Audits....................................................................................................... Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance............................................ Acknowledgment Appendix 1: Example of an Audit Engagement Letter Appendix 2: Determining the Acceptability of General Purpose Frameworks A1 A2-A20 A21-A27 A28 A34-A37 6-8 9-12 13 14-17 18-21 1 2 3 4-5
Philippine Standard on Auditing (PSA) 210, Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements should be read in conjunction with PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing.
Introduction
Scope of this PSA 1. This Philippine Standard on Auditing (PSA) deals with the auditors responsibilities in agreeing the terms of the audit engagement with management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance. This includes establishing that certain preconditions for an audit, responsibility for which rests with management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, are present. PSA 220 (Redrafted)1 deals with those aspects of engagement acceptance that are within the control of the auditor.
(Ref: Para. A1)
Effective Date 2. This PSA is effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009.
Objective
3. The objective of the auditor is to accept or continue an audit engagement only when the basis upon which it is to be performed has been agreed, through: (a) (b) Establishing whether the preconditions for an audit are present; and Confirming that there is a common understanding between the auditor and management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance of the terms of the audit engagement.
Definitions
4. For purposes of the PSAs, the following term has the meaning attributed below: Preconditions for an audit The use by management of an acceptable financial reporting framework in the preparation of the financial statements and the agreement of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance to the premise2 on which an audit is conducted. 5. For the purposes of this PSA, references to management should be read hereafter as management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance.
PSA 220 (Redrafted), Quality Control for an Audit of Financial Statements. PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing, paragraph 13.
Requirements
Preconditions for an Audit 6. In order to establish whether the preconditions for an audit are present, the auditor shall: (a) Determine whether the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements is acceptable; and (Ref: Para. A2-A10) Obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility: (Ref: Para A11-A14, A20) (i) For the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation; (Ref: Para. A15) For such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and (Ref: Para.
A16-A19)
(b)
(ii)
(iii)
To provide the auditor with: a. Access to all information of which management is aware that is relevant to the preparation of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters; Additional information that the auditor may request from management for the purpose of the audit; and Unrestricted access to persons within the entity from whom the auditor determines it necessary to obtain audit evidence.
b.
c.
Limitation on Scope Prior to Audit Engagement Acceptance 7. If management or those charged with governance impose a limitation on the scope of the auditors work in the terms of a proposed audit engagement such that the auditor believes the limitation will result in the auditor disclaiming an opinion on the financial statements, the auditor shall not accept such a limited engagement as an audit engagement, unless required by law or regulation to do so.
Other Factors Affecting Audit Engagement Acceptance 8. If the preconditions for an audit are not present, the auditor shall discuss the matter with management. Unless required by law or regulation to do so, the auditor shall not accept the proposed audit engagement: (a) If the auditor has determined that the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements is unacceptable, except as provided in paragraph 19; or
(b)
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms 9. The auditor shall agree the terms of the audit engagement with management or those charged with governance, as appropriate. (Ref: Para. A21) Subject to paragraph 11, the agreed terms of the audit engagement shall be recorded in an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement and shall include: (Ref: Para. A22-A25) (a) (b) (c) (d) The objective and scope of the audit of the financial statements; The responsibilities of the auditor; The responsibilities of management; Identification of the applicable financial reporting framework for the preparation of the financial statements; and Reference to the expected form and content of any reports to be issued by the auditor and a statement that there may be circumstances in which a report may differ from its expected form and content.
10.
(e)
11.
If law or regulation prescribes in sufficient detail the terms of the audit engagement referred to in paragraph 10, the auditor need not record them in a written agreement, except for the fact that such law or regulation applies and that management acknowledges and understands its responsibilities as set out in paragraph 6(b). (Ref:
Para. A22, A26-A27)
12.
If law or regulation prescribes responsibilities of management similar to those described in paragraph 6(b), the auditor may determine that the law or regulation includes responsibilities that, in the auditors judgment, are equivalent in effect to those set out in that paragraph. For such responsibilities that are equivalent, the auditor may use the wording of the law or regulation to describe them in the written agreement. For those responsibilities that are not prescribed by law or regulation such that their effect is equivalent, the written agreement shall use the description in paragraph 6(b). (Ref: Para. A26)
Recurring Audits 13. On recurring audits, the auditor shall assess whether circumstances require the terms of the audit engagement to be revised and whether there is a need to remind the entity of the existing terms of the audit engagement. (Ref: Para. A28)
Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement 14. The auditor shall not agree to a change in the terms of the audit engagement where there is no reasonable justification for doing so. (Ref: Para. A29-A31) If, prior to completing the audit engagement, the auditor is requested to change the audit engagement to an engagement that conveys a lower level of assurance, the 5
15.
16.
If the terms of the audit engagement are changed, the auditor and management shall agree on and record the new terms of the engagement in an engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement. If the auditor is unable to agree to a change of the terms of the audit engagement and is not permitted by management to continue the original audit engagement, the auditor shall: (a) Withdraw from the audit engagement where possible under applicable law or regulation; and Determine whether there is any obligation, either contractual or otherwise, to report the circumstances to other parties, such as those charged with governance, owners or regulators.
17.
(b)
Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation 18. If financial reporting standards established by an authorized or recognized standards setting organization are supplemented by law or regulation, the auditor shall determine whether there are any conflicts between the financial reporting standards and the additional requirements. If such conflicts exist, the auditor shall discuss with management the nature of the additional requirements and shall agree whether: (a) The additional requirements can be met through additional disclosures in the financial statements; or The description of the applicable financial reporting framework in the financial statements can be amended accordingly.
(b)
If neither of the above actions is possible, the auditor shall determine whether it will be necessary to modify the auditors opinion in accordance with PSA 705 (Revised and Redrafted).3 (Ref: Para. A34) Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or RegulationOther Matters Affecting Acceptance 19. If the auditor has determined that the financial reporting framework prescribed by law or regulation would be unacceptable but for the fact that it is prescribed by law or regulation, the auditor shall accept the audit engagement only if the following conditions are present: (Ref: Para. A35) (a) Management agrees to provide additional disclosures in the financial statements required to avoid the financial statements being misleading; and
PSA 705 (Revised and Redrafted), Modifications to the Opinion in the Independent Auditors Report.
(b)
It is recognized in the terms of the audit engagement that: (i) The auditors report on the financial statements will incorporate an Emphasis of Matter paragraph, drawing users attention to the additional disclosures, in accordance with PSA 706 (Revised and Redrafted);4 and Unless the auditor is required by law or regulation to express the auditors opinion on the financial statements by using the phrases present fairly, in all material respects in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, the auditors opinion on the financial statements will not include such phrases.
(ii)
20.
If the conditions outlined in paragraph 19 are not present and the auditor is required by law or regulation to undertake the audit engagement, the auditor shall: (a) Evaluate the effect of the misleading nature of the financial statements on the auditors report; and Include appropriate reference to this matter in the terms of the audit engagement.
(b)
Auditors Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation 21. In some cases, law or regulation of the relevant jurisdiction prescribes the layout or wording of the auditors report in a form or in terms that are significantly different from the requirements of PSAs. In these circumstances, the auditor shall evaluate: (a) Whether users might misunderstand the assurance obtained from the audit of the financial statements and, if so, Whether additional explanation in the auditors report can mitigate possible misunderstanding.5
(b)
If the auditor concludes that additional explanation in the auditors report cannot mitigate possible misunderstanding, the auditor shall not accept the audit engagement, unless required by law or regulation to do so. An audit conducted in accordance with such law or regulation does not comply with PSAs. Accordingly, the auditor shall not include any reference within the auditors report to the audit having been conducted in accordance with PSAs.6 (Ref: Para. A36-A37)
***
PSA 706 (Revised and Redrafted), Emphasis of Matter Paragraphs and Other Matter Paragraphs in the Independent Auditors Report. PSA 706 (Revised and Redrafted). See also PSA 700 (Redrafted), Forming an Opinion and Reporting on Financial Statements, paragraph 43.
Preconditions for an Audit The Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 6(a)) A2. A condition for acceptance of an assurance engagement is that the criteria referred to in the definition of an assurance engagement are suitable and available to intended users.9 Criteria are the benchmarks used to evaluate or measure the subject matter including, where relevant, benchmarks for presentation and disclosure. Suitable criteria enable reasonably consistent evaluation or measurement of a subject matter within the context of professional judgment. For purposes of the PSAs, the applicable financial reporting framework provides the criteria the auditor uses to audit the financial statements, including where relevant their fair presentation. Without an acceptable financial reporting framework, management does not have an appropriate basis for the preparation of the financial statements and the auditor does not have suitable criteria for auditing the financial statements. In many cases the auditor may presume that the applicable financial reporting framework is acceptable, as described in paragraphs A8-A9.
A3
Determining the Acceptability of the Financial Reporting Framework A4. Factors that are relevant to the auditors determination of the acceptability of the financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements include: The nature of the entity (for example, whether it is a business enterprise, a public sector entity or a not for profit organization); The purpose of the financial statements (for example, whether they are prepared to meet the common financial information needs of a wide range of users or the financial information needs of specific users);
Philippine Framework for Assurance Engagements, paragraph 17. PSA 220 (Redrafted), paragraphs 9-11. Philippine Framework for Assurance Engagements, paragraph 17(b)(ii).
A5.
Many users of financial statements are not in a position to demand financial statements tailored to meet their specific information needs. While all the information needs of specific users cannot be met, there are financial information needs that are common to a wide range of users. Financial statements prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework designed to meet the common financial information needs of a wide range of users are referred to as general purpose financial statements. In some cases, the financial statements will be prepared in accordance with a financial reporting framework designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users. Such financial statements are referred to as special purpose financial statements. The financial information needs of the intended users will determine the applicable financial reporting framework in these circumstances. PSA 800 (Revised and Redrafted) discusses the acceptability of financial reporting frameworks designed to meet the financial information needs of specific users.10 Deficiencies in the applicable financial reporting framework that indicate that the framework is not acceptable may be encountered after the audit engagement has been accepted. When use of that framework is prescribed by law or regulation, the requirements of paragraphs 19-20 apply. When use of that framework is not prescribed by law or regulation, management may decide to adopt another framework that is acceptable. When management does so, as required by paragraph 16, new terms of the audit engagement are agreed to reflect the change in the framework as the previously agreed terms will no longer be accurate.
A6.
A7.
General purpose frameworks A8. At present, there is no objective and authoritative basis that has been generally recognized globally for judging the acceptability of general purpose frameworks. In the absence of such a basis, financial reporting standards established by organizations that are authorized or recognized to promulgate standards to be used by certain types of entities are presumed to be acceptable for general purpose financial statements prepared by such entities, provided the organizations follow an established and transparent process involving deliberation and consideration of the views of a wide range of stakeholders. Examples of such financial reporting standards include: International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board; Philippine Financial Reporting Standards (PFRSs) issued by the Financial Reporting Standards Council; International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSASs) promulgated by the International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board; and
10
PSA 800 (Revised and Redrafted), Special ConsiderationsAudits of Financial Statements Prepared in Accordance with Special Purpose Frameworks, paragraph 8.
These financial reporting standards are often identified as the applicable financial reporting framework in law or regulation governing the preparation of general purpose financial statements. Financial reporting frameworks prescribed by law or regulation A9. In accordance with paragraph 6(a), the auditor is required to determine whether the financial reporting framework, to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements, is acceptable. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may prescribe the financial reporting framework to be used in the preparation of general purpose financial statements for certain types of entities. In the absence of indications to the contrary, such a financial reporting framework is presumed to be acceptable for general purpose financial statements prepared by such entities. In the event that the framework is not considered to be acceptable, paragraphs 19-20 apply.
Jurisdictions that do not have standards setting organizations or prescribed financial reporting frameworks A10. When an entity is registered or operating in a jurisdiction that does not have an authorized or recognized standards setting organization, or where use of the financial reporting framework is not prescribed by law or regulation, management identifies a financial reporting framework to be applied in the preparation of the financial statements. Appendix 2 contains guidance on determining the acceptability of financial reporting frameworks in such circumstances.
Agreement of the Responsibilities of Management (Ref: Para. 6(b)) A11. An audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management has acknowledged and understands that it has the responsibilities set out in paragraph 6(b).11 In certain jurisdictions, such responsibilities may be specified in law or regulation. In others, there may be little or no legal or regulatory definition of such responsibilities. PSAs do not override law or regulation in such matters. However, the concept of an independent audit requires that the auditors role does not involve taking responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements or for the entitys related internal control, and that the auditor has a reasonable expectation of obtaining the information necessary for the audit in so far as management is able to provide or procure it. Accordingly, the premise is fundamental to the conduct of an independent audit. To avoid misunderstanding, agreement is reached with management that it acknowledges and understands that it has such responsibilities as part of agreeing and recording the terms of the audit engagement in paragraphs 9-12. The way in which the responsibilities for financial reporting are divided between management and those charged with governance will vary according to the resources and structure of the entity and any relevant law or regulation, and the respective roles of management and those charged with governance within the entity. In most cases,
A12.
11
10
A14.
Preparation of the Financial Statements (Ref: Para 6(b)(i)) A15. Most financial reporting frameworks include requirements relating to the presentation of the financial statements; for such frameworks, preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the financial reporting framework includes presentation. In the case of a fair presentation framework the importance of the reporting objective of fair presentation is such that the premise agreed with management includes specific reference to fair presentation in accordance with the financial reporting framework.
Internal Control (Ref: Para. 6(b)(ii)) A16. Management maintains such internal control as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Internal control, no matter how effective, can provide an entity with only reasonable assurance about achieving the entitys financial reporting objectives due to the inherent limitations of internal control.14 An independent audit conducted in accordance with the PSAs does not act as a substitute for the maintenance of internal control necessary for the preparation of financial statements by management. Accordingly, the auditor is required to obtain the agreement of management that it acknowledges and understands its responsibility for internal control. However, the agreement required by paragraph 6(b)(ii) does not
A17.
12
PSA 580 (Revised and Redrafted), Written Representations, paragraphs 10-11. PSA 580 (Revised and Redrafted), paragraph A28. PSA 315 (Redrafted), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment, paragraph A42.
13
14
11
A19.
Considerations Relevant to Smaller Entities (Ref: Para. 6(b)) A20. One of the purposes of agreeing the terms of the audit engagement is to avoid misunderstanding about the respective responsibilities of management and the auditor. For example, when a third party has assisted with the preparation of the financial statements, it may be useful to remind management that the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework remains its responsibility.
Agreement on Audit Engagement Terms Agreeing the Terms of the Audit Engagement (Ref: Para. 9) A21. The roles of management and those charged with governance in agreeing the terms of the audit engagement for the entity depend on the governance structure of the entity and relevant law or regulation.
Audit Engagement Letter or Other Form of Written Agreement16 (Ref: Para. 10-11) A22. It is in the interests of both the entity and the auditor that the auditor sends an audit engagement letter before the commencement of the audit to help avoid misunderstandings with respect to the audit. In some countries, however, the objective
15
PSA 315 (Redrafted), paragraph A47 and Appendix 1. In the paragraphs that follow, any reference to an audit engagement letter is to be taken as a reference to an audit engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement.
16
12
A24.
When relevant, the following points could also be made in the audit engagement letter: Arrangements concerning the involvement of other auditors and experts in some aspects of the audit. Arrangements concerning the involvement of internal auditors and other staff of the entity.
17
13
An example of an audit engagement letter is set out in Appendix 1. Audits of Components A25. When the auditor of a parent entity is also the auditor of a component, the factors that may influence the decision whether to send a separate audit engagement letter to the component include the following: Who appoints the component auditor; Whether a separate auditors report is to be issued on the component; Legal requirements in relation to audit appointments; Degree of ownership by parent; and Degree of independence of the component management from the parent entity.
Responsibilities of Management Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 11-12) A26. If, in the circumstances described in paragraphs A22 and A27, the auditor concludes that it is not necessary to record certain terms of the audit engagement in an audit engagement letter, the auditor is still required by paragraph 11 to seek the written agreement from management that it acknowledges and understands that it has the responsibilities set out in paragraph 6(b). However, in accordance with paragraph 12, such written agreement may use the wording of the law or regulation if such law or regulation establishes responsibilities for management that are equivalent in effect to those described in paragraph 6(b). The accounting profession, audit standards setter, or audit regulator in a jurisdiction may have provided guidance as to whether the description in law or regulation is equivalent.
Considerations specific to public sector entities A27. Law or regulation governing the operations of public sector audits generally mandate the appointment of a public sector auditor and commonly set out the public sector auditors responsibilities and powers, including the power to access an entitys records and other information. When law or regulation prescribes in sufficient detail the terms of the audit engagement, the public sector auditor may nonetheless consider that there are benefits in issuing a fuller audit engagement letter than permitted by paragraph 11.
Recurring Audits (Ref: Para. 13) A28. The auditor may decide not to send a new audit engagement letter or other written agreement each period. However, the following factors may make it appropriate to revise the terms of the audit engagement or to remind the entity of existing terms: Any indication that the entity misunderstands the objective and scope of the audit. 14
Acceptance of a Change in the Terms of the Audit Engagement Request to Change the Terms of the Audit Engagement (Ref: Para. 14) A29. A request from the entity for the auditor to change the terms of the audit engagement may result from a change in circumstances affecting the need for the service, a misunderstanding as to the nature of an audit as originally requested or a restriction on the scope of the audit engagement, whether imposed by management or caused by other circumstances. The auditor, as required by paragraph 14, considers the justification given for the request, particularly the implications of a restriction on the scope of the audit engagement. A change in circumstances that affects the entitys requirements or a misunderstanding concerning the nature of the service originally requested may be considered a reasonable basis for requesting a change in the audit engagement. In contrast, a change may not be considered reasonable if it appears that the change relates to information that is incorrect, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory. An example might be where the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding receivables and the entity asks for the audit engagement to be changed to a review engagement to avoid a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion.
A30.
A31.
Request to Change to a Review or a Related Service (Ref: Para. 15) A32. Before agreeing to change an audit engagement to a review or a related service, an auditor who was engaged to perform an audit in accordance with PSAs may need to assess, in addition to the matters referred to in paragraphs A29-A31 above, any legal or contractual implications of the change. If the auditor concludes that there is reasonable justification to change the audit engagement to a review or a related service, the audit work performed to the date of change may be relevant to the changed engagement; however, the work required to be performed and the report to be issued would be those appropriate to the revised engagement. In order to avoid confusing the reader, the report on the related service would not include reference to: (a) The original audit engagement; or
A33.
15
Additional Considerations in Engagement Acceptance Financial Reporting Standards Supplemented by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 18) A34. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation may supplement the financial reporting standards established by an authorized or recognized standards setting organization with additional requirements relating to the preparation of financial statements. In those jurisdictions, the applicable financial reporting framework for the purposes of applying the PSAs encompasses both the identified financial reporting framework and such additional requirements provided they do not conflict with the identified financial reporting framework. This may, for example, be the case when law or regulation prescribes disclosures in addition to those required by the financial reporting standards or when they narrow the range of acceptable choices that can be made within the financial reporting standards.18
Financial Reporting Framework Prescribed by Law or RegulationOther Matters Affecting Acceptance (Ref: Para. 19) A35. Law or regulation may prescribe that the wording of the auditors opinion use the phrases present fairly, in all material respects in a case where the auditor concludes that the applicable financial reporting framework prescribed by law or regulation would otherwise have been unacceptable. In this case, the terms of the prescribed wording of the auditors report are significantly different from the requirements of PSAs (see paragraph 21).
Auditors Report Prescribed by Law or Regulation (Ref: Para. 21) A36. PSAs require that the auditor shall not represent compliance with PSAs unless the auditor has complied with all of the PSAs relevant to the audit.1919 When law or regulation prescribes the layout or wording of the auditors report in a form or in terms that are significantly different from the requirements of PSAs and the auditor concludes that additional explanation in the auditors report cannot mitigate possible misunderstanding, the auditor may consider including a statement in the auditors report that the audit is not conducted in accordance with PSAs. The auditor is, however, encouraged to apply PSAs, including the PSAs that address the auditors report, to the extent practicable, notwithstanding that the auditor is not permitted to refer to the audit being conducted in accordance with PSAs.
18
PSA 700 (Redrafted), paragraph 15, includes a requirement regarding the evaluation of whether the financial statements adequately refer to or describe the applicable financial reporting framework. PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), paragraph 20.
19
16
Considerations Specific to Public Sector Entities A37. In the public sector, specific requirements may exist within the legislation governing the audit mandate; for example, the auditor may be required to report directly to a minister, the legislature or the public if the entity attempts to limit the scope of the audit.
Acknowledgment
This PSA is based on International Standard on Auditing 210 (Redrafted), Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. There are no significant differences between this PSA 210 (Redrafted) and ISA 210 (Redrafted), except for the deletion of footnote 23, Appendix 2 and footnotes 43, 44 and last sentence of footnote 45 of the conforming amendments to PSA 700 (Redrafted), which do not apply in the Philippines and are therefore not used.
17
Appendix 1
(Ref: Paras. A23-24)
20
The addressees and references in the letter would be those that are appropriate in the circumstances of the engagement, including the relevant jurisdiction. It is important to refer to the appropriate persons see paragraph A21. Throughout this letter, references to you, we, us, management, those charged with governance and auditor would be used or amended as appropriate in the circumstances.
21
18
(c)
(ii)
(iii)
As part of our audit process, we will request from [management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance], written confirmation concerning representations made to us in connection with the audit. We look forward to full cooperation from your staff during our audit. [Other relevant information] [Insert other information, such as fee arrangements, billings and other specific terms, as appropriate.]
22
Use terminology as appropriate in the circumstances. Or, if appropriate, For the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. [This footnote does not apply in the Philippines and therefore not used.]
23
19
[Reporting] [Insert appropriate reference to the expected form and content of the auditors report.] The form and content of our report may need to be amended in the light of our audit findings. Please sign and return the attached copy of this letter to indicate your acknowledgement of, and agreement with, the arrangements for our audit of the financial statements including our respective responsibilities.
Acknowledged and agreed on behalf of ABC Company by (signed) ...................... Name and Title Date
20
Appendix 2
(Ref: Para. A10)
[This Appendix 2 does not apply in the Philippines and is therefore not used.]
2.
3.
(b)
(c)
21
(ii)
(d)
Neutrality, in that it contributes to information in the financial statements that is free from bias. Understandability, in that the information in the financial statements is clear and comprehensive and not subject to significantly different interpretation.
(e)
4.
The auditor may decide to compare the accounting conventions to the requirements of an existing financial reporting framework considered to be acceptable. For example, the auditor may compare the accounting conventions to IFRSs. For an audit of a small entity, the auditor may decide to compare the accounting conventions to a financial reporting framework specifically developed for such entities by an authorized or recognized standards setting organization. When the auditor makes such a comparison and differences are identified, the decision as to whether the accounting conventions adopted in the preparation and presentation of the financial statements constitute an acceptable financial reporting framework includes considering the reasons for the differences and whether application of the accounting conventions, or the description of the financial reporting framework in the financial statements, could result in financial statements that are misleading. A conglomeration of accounting conventions devised to suit individual preferences is not an acceptable financial reporting framework for general purpose financial statements. Similarly, a compliance framework will not be an acceptable financial reporting framework, unless it is generally accepted in the particular jurisdictions by preparers and users. 23
5.
22
PSA 210 (Redrafted) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS TO OTHER PSAs AS A RESULT OF PSA 210 (REDRAFTED), AGREEING THE TERMS OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENTS
PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 1-3.] 4. The financial statements subject to audit are those of the entity, prepared and presented by management of the entity with oversight from those charged with governance. PSAs do not impose responsibilities on management or those charged with governance and do not override laws and regulations that govern their responsibilities. However, an audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance have acknowledged certain responsibilities that are fundamental to the conduct of the audit. The audit of the financial statements does not relieve management or those charged with governance of their those responsibilities. (Ref: Para. A2-A11)
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 5-12.] Definitions 13. For purposes of the PSAs, the following terms have the meanings attributed below (j) Premise, relating to the responsibilities of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, on which an audit is conducted That management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance have acknowledged and understand that they have the following responsibilities that are fundamental to the conduct of an audit in accordance with PSAs. That is, responsibility: (i) For the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;, including where relevant their fair presentation this includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error; and For such internal control as management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and To provide the auditor with: a. Access to Aall information, such as records and documentation, and other matters of which management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance are aware that is are relevant to the preparation and presentation of the
(ii)
(iii)
23
c.
In the case of a fair presentation framework, the responsibility is(i) above may be restated as for the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements in accordance with the financial reporting framework; in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. This applies to all references to preparation and presentation of the financial statements in the PSAs. The premise, relating to the responsibilities of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, on which an audit is conducted may also be referred to as the premise. [No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 14-24 and A1.] Preparation of the Financial Statements (Ref: Para.4) A2. Law or regulation may establish the responsibilities of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance in relation to financial reporting. However, the extent of these responsibilities, or the way in which they are described, may differ across jurisdictions. Despite these differences, aAn audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance have acknowledged and understand that they have responsibility: (a) For the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework;, including where relevant their fair presentation this includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error; and For such internal control as management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and To provide the auditor with: (i) Access to Aall information, such as records and documentation, and other matters of which management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance are aware that is are relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters;
(b)
(bc)
24
(ii)
Any aAdditional information that the auditor may request from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance for the purpose of the audit; and Unrestricted access to persons those within the entity from whom the auditor determines it necessary to obtain audit evidence.
(iii)
A3.
As part of their responsibility for tThe preparation and presentation of the financial statements, by management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance requires are responsible for: The identification of the applicable financial reporting framework, in the context of any relevant laws or regulations. The preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with that framework. The inclusion of Aan adequate description of that framework in the financial statements.
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs A4-A9.] A10. Because of the significance of the premise to the conduct of an audit, the auditor is required to obtain the agreement of from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance that they acknowledge and understand that they have their responsibilities set out in paragraph A2 as a precondition for accepting the audit engagement.24 The auditor is also required to obtain written representations about whether management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance have fulfilled those responsibilities.25
24
PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraph 6(b). PSA 580 (Revised and Redrafted), Written Representations, paragraphs 10-11.
25
25
(b)
(c)
[No amendments are proposed to paragraph 7.] Definitions 8. For purposes of this PSA, references to management should be read as management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance. Furthermore, in the case of a fair presentation framework, management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework.
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 9.] Written Representations about Managements Responsibilities Preparation and Presentation of the Financial Statements 10. The auditor shall request management to provide a written representation that it has fulfilled its responsibility for the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation, as set out in the terms of the audit engagement.26 and, in particular, whether the financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework. (Ref: Para.
A9-A11, A16, A24)
26
26
Information Provided and Completeness of Transactions to the Auditor 11. The auditor shall request management to provide a written representation that: (a) Iit has provided the auditor with all relevant information and access as agreed in the terms of the audit engagement,27 and that aAll transactions have been recorded and are reflected in the financial statements. (Ref: Para. A9-A11, A16, A24)
(b)
Description of Managements Responsibilities in the Written Representations 12. Managements responsibilities shall be described in the written representations required by paragraphs 10 and 11 in the manner in which these responsibilities are described in the terms of the audit engagement. (Ref: Para. A3)
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 13-20 and A1.] Premise, relating to Managements Responsibilities, on which an Audit is Conducted
(Ref: Para. 6(a), 12)
A2.
Law or regulation may establish managements responsibilities in relation to financial reporting. However, the extent of these responsibilities, or the way in which they are described, may differ across jurisdictions. Despite these differences, an audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted on the premise that management has responsibility: (a) For the preparation and presentation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework; this includes the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; and To provide the auditor with: (i) All information, such as records and documentation, and other matters that are relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements; Any additional information that the auditor may request from management; and
(b)
(ii)
(iii)
Unrestricted access to those within the entity from whom the auditor determines it necessary to obtain audit evidence.28
27
PSA 210, paragraph 6(b)(iii). [Proposed] PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), Overall Objective of the Independent Auditor, and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing, paragraph [8].
28
27
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs A4-A8.] Written Representations about Managements Responsibilities (Ref: Para. 10-11) A9. Audit evidence obtained during the audit that management has fulfilled is fulfilling the responsibilities referred to in paragraphs 10 and 11 that it agreed to in the terms of the audit engagement is not sufficient without obtaining confirmation from management that it believes that it has fulfilled those responsibilities. This is because the auditor is not able to judge solely on other audit evidence whether management has prepared the financial statements and provided information to the auditor on the basis of the agreed acknowledgement and understanding of its responsibilities. For example, the auditor could not conclude that management has provided the auditor with all relevant the information agreed in the terms of the audit engagement described in paragraph A2(b) without asking it whether, and receiving confirmation that, such information has been provided.
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs A10-A20.] Form of Written Representations (Ref: Para. 15) A21. Written representations are required to be included in a representation letter addressed to the auditor. In some jurisdictions, however, management may be required by law or regulation to make a written public statement about its responsibilities. Although such statement is a representation to the users of the financial statements, or to relevant authorities, the auditor may determine that it is an appropriate form of written representation in respect of some or all of the representations required by paragraph 10 or 11. Consequently, the relevant matters covered by such statement need not be included in the representation letter. Factors that may affect the auditors determination include: Whether the statement includes confirmation of the fulfillment of the responsibilities referred to in paragraphs 10 and 11 that are equivalent to some or all of those set out in the terms of the audit engagement. Whether the statement has been given or approved by those from whom the auditor requests the relevant written representations. Whether a copy of the statement is provided to the auditor as near as practicable to, but not after, the date of the auditors report on the financial statements (see paragraph 14).
29
[Proposed] PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraph [4(b)]. [Proposed] PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraph [11].
30
28
31
29
Appendix 2
(Ref: Para. A23)
Information Provided We have provided you with: o Access to all information of which we are aware, such as records and documentation, and other matters that is are relevant to the preparation and presentation of the financial statements such as records, documentation and other matters; o Additional information that you have requested from us for the purpose of the audit; and o Unrestricted access to persons those within the entity from whom you determined it necessary to obtain audit evidence. [No other amendments are proposed to Appendix 2.]
32
PSA 570 (Redrafted), Going Concern. [See footnote 15.] Where the auditor reports on more than one period, the auditor adjusts the date so that the letter pertains to all periods covered by the auditors report.
33
30
25.
26.
27.
[No amendments are proposed to paragraphs 28-A4.] Description of the Applicable Financial Reporting Framework (Ref: Para. 15) A5. As explained in PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), the preparation of the financial statements by management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance requires the inclusion ofhave responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework and for an adequate description of that the applicable financial reporting framework in the financial statements.34 That description is important because it advises users of the financial statements of the framework on which the financial statements are based.
34
31
Managements Responsibility for the Financial Statements (Ref: Para. 26) A20. PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted) explains the premise, relating to the responsibilities of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance, on which an audit in accordance with PSAs is conducted.35 Management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance accept responsibility are responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable financial reporting framework, including where relevant their fair presentation. For example, in the case of many general purpose frameworks, management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that fairly present the financial position, financial performance and cash flows of the entity in accordance with those frameworks. This Management also accepts responsibility includes the design, implementation and maintenance of for such internal control relevant as it determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In some jurisdictions, law or regulation prescribing managements responsibilities may specifically refer to a responsibility for the adequacy of accounting books and records, or accounting system. As books, records and systems are an integral part of internal control (as defined in PSA 315 (Redrafted)36) no specific reference is made to them in paragraph 26 for the description of managements responsibilities. The description of managements responsibilities in the auditors report includes reference to both responsibilities as it helps to explain to users the premise on which an audit is conducted. There may be circumstances when it is appropriate for the auditor to add to the description of managements responsibility in paragraph 26 to reflect additional responsibilities that are relevant to the preparation of the financial statements in the context of the particular jurisdiction or the nature of the entity. Paragraph 26 is consistent with the form in which the responsibilities are agreed in the engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement, as required by PSA 210 (Redrafted).37 PSA 210 (Redrafted) provides some flexibility by explaining explains that, if law or regulation prescribes the responsibilities of management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance in relation to financial reporting, the auditor may determine that the law or regulation includes responsibilities that, in the auditors judgment, are equivalent in effect to those set out in PSA 210 (Redrafted). For such responsibilities that are equivalent, the auditor may use the wording of the law or regulation to describe them in the engagement letter or other suitable form of written agreement. In such cases, this wording may also be used in the auditors report to describe managements responsibilities as required by paragraph 26. In other circumstances, including where the auditor decides not to use the wording of law or regulation as incorporated in the engagement letter, the wording of paragraph 26 is used. For those that are not prescribed by law or regulation such
A21.
A22.
35
PSA 200 (Revised and Redrafted), paragraph 13(j). PSA 315 (Redrafted), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatements Through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment, paragraph 4(c). PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraphs 6(b)(i) and (ii).
36
37
32
(b)
If the auditor concludes that additional explanation in the auditors report cannot mitigate possible misunderstanding, PSA 210 (Redrafted) requires the auditor not to accept the audit engagement, unless required by law or regulation to do so. In accordance with PSA 210 (Redrafted), an audit conducted in accordance with such law or regulation does not comply with PSAs. Accordingly, the auditor does not include any reference in the auditors report to the audit having been conducted in accordance with Philippine Standards on Auditing.40 [No amendments are proposed to paragraphs A27-A54.]
38
[PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraph [to be inserted].] PSA 315 (Redrafted), Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatements through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment, paragraph 4(c). PSA 210 (Redrafted), paragraph 21.
39
40
33
Appendix
(Ref: Para. A16)
Illustration 1: Circumstances include the following: Audit of a complete set of financial statements. The financial statements are prepared for a general purpose by management of the entity in accordance with Philippine Financial Reporting Standards. The terms of the audit engagement reflect description of managements responsibility for the financial statements in PSA 210 (Redrafted). In addition to the audit of the financial statements, the auditor has other reporting responsibilities required under local law.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT [Appropriate Addressee] Report on the Financial Statements41 We have audited the accompanying financial statements of ABC Company, which comprise the balance sheet as at December 31, 20X1, and the income statement, statement of changes in equity and cash flow statement for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information.
41
The sub-title Report on the Financial Statements is unnecessary in circumstances when the second subtitle Report on Other Legal and Regulatory Requirements is not applicable.
34
Or other term that is appropriate in the context of the legal framework in the particular jurisdiction. Depending on the circumstances,Where managements responsibility is to prepare financial statements that give a true and fair view, this sentence may read: Management is responsible for the preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, and for such [This footnote does not apply in the Philippines and is therefore not used.] Depending on the circumstances In the case of footnote 43, this sentence may read: In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entitys internal control. [This footnote does not apply in the Philippines and is therefore not used.] In circumstances when the auditor also has responsibility to express an opinion on the effectiveness of internal control in conjunction with the audit of the financial statements, this sentence would be worded as follows: In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. In the case of footnote 43, this sentence may read: In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entitys preparation of financial statements that give a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. [This last sentence does not apply in the Philippines and is therefore not used.]
43
44
45
35
36
Additional Conforming Amendments PSA 240 (Redrafted), The Auditors Responsibilities Relating to Fraud in an Audit of Financial Statements
39. The auditor shall obtain written representations from management and, where applicable, those charged with governance that: (a) They It acknowledges their its responsibility for the design, implementation and maintenance of internal control to prevent and detect fraud; They have It has disclosed to the auditor the results of managements its assessment of the risk that the financial statements may be materially misstated as a result of fraud; They have It has disclosed to the auditor their its knowledge of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the entity involving: (i) (ii) (iii) Management; Employees who have significant roles in internal control; or Others where the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements; and
(b)
(c)
(d)
They have It has disclosed to the auditor their its knowledge of any allegations of fraud, or suspected fraud, affecting the entitys financial statements communicated by employees, former employees, analysts, regulators or others. (Ref: Para. A57-A58)
A12.
Management accepts responsibility is responsible for the entitys internal control and for the preparation of the entitys financial statements. Accordingly, it is appropriate for the auditor to make inquiries of management regarding managements own assessment of the risk of fraud and the controls in place to prevent and detect it. The nature, extent and frequency of managements assessment of such risk and controls may vary from entity to entity. In some entities, management may make detailed assessments on an annual basis or as part of continuous monitoring. In other entities, managements assessment may be less structured and less frequent. The nature, extent and frequency of managements assessment are relevant to the auditors understanding of the entitys control environment. For example, the fact that management has not made an assessment of the risk of fraud may in some circumstances be indicative of the lack of importance that management places on internal control. PSA 580 (Revised and Redrafted)46 establishes requirements and provides guidance on obtaining appropriate representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance in the audit. In addition to acknowledging that they have fulfilled their its responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements, it
A57.
46
37
(b)
PSA 540 (Revised and Redrafted), Auditing Accounting Estimates, Including Fair Value Accounting Estimates, and Related Disclosures
22. The auditor shall obtain written representations from management and, where appropriate, those charged with governance whether they management believes significant assumptions used by it in making accounting estimates are reasonable. (Ref: Para. A126-A127)
47
38
48
[Proposed] PSA 210 (Redrafted), Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements, paragraph A22[A23].
39
This PSA 210 (Redrafted), Agreeing the Terms of Audit Engagements, was unanimously approved for adoption on April 27, 2009 by the members of the Auditing and Assurance Standards Council.
Felicidad A. Abad
Antonio P. Acyatan
Froilan G. Ampil
David L. Balangue
Eliseo A. Fernandez
Judith V. Lopez
Jaime P. Naranjo
Nestorio C. Roraldo
Joaquin P. Tolentino
Jaime E. Ysmael
40