Chapter 2 Edited-1
Chapter 2 Edited-1
2.1 Introduction
In this chapter, which treats only a single species, which are not intended to be very realis-
tic, various mathematical assumptions (a number of the difficulties which arise typically in
building mathematical models) on the growth rate are discussed. The birth rate of a human
population is usually given in terms of the number of births per thousand in one year. The
period of one year is also only a convention; the birth rate could just as well be given in terms
of a week, a second or any other unit of time. Similar remarks apply to the death rate and to
the growth rate. The dependence of the growth rate on food supply and the negative effects
of overcrowding.
Before describing a model, we explain some assumptions upon a single species population:
i. the ecological properties (e.g., age, sex, etc) of each individuals are identical
ii. the population growth rate is governed by the birth and death rates
We assume that u(t) is continuously differentiable. We obtain the instantaneous per capita
growth rate at time t as
u(t + ∂t) − u(t) u′ (t)
lim =
∂t→0 u(t)∂t u(t)
This is function of t, the growth rate of the population at time t where the rate of change of
u(t) is
du
u′ (t) =
dt
The dynamics of a single species population can be described by
1
Where, u(t) denotes the size of the population at time t. The simplest assumption is that of
constant growth rate which depends only on birth and death processes, that is,
Example: If the birth rate is 3.2 per hundred and the death rate is 1.8 per hundred,
then the growth rate is 3.2–1.8 = 1.4 per hundred = 1.4/100 = 0.014. Then the equation for
population growth
du
= 0.014u,
dt
where u is the density of population.
ln(u/u0 ) = r(t − t0 ).
The population will eventually either die out (r negative) or grow to fill the universe (r
positive) or constant (r = 0). The model is useful for short term predictions. This is known
as the exponential law of growth or Malthusian law of growth. It was first enunciated
by Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834) an English professor of history and political economy
in 1798, who concluded that, “Population, when unchecked, increases in a geometric ratio”
and so this is called Malthusian model.
2
Behavior of the solution
Different values of r, we obtain three different solution of Malthusian model.
Case 1: If r < 0, we get,
u(∞) = lim u(t) = 0.
t→∞
This is called the case of extinction (decays exponentially).
Case 2: If r = 0, then we have
u(t) = u0 .
The population remains unchanged (constant).
Case 3: If r > 0, then we obtain
u(∞) = lim u(t) = ∞.
t→∞
10
6
u(t)
4 r>0
1
r<0
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
t
3
Proof. We know that
u(t) = u0 er(t−t0 ) .
By definition, u(t0 + T ) = 2u(t0 ). But the equation (2.3.2) implies that
Example 2.3.1. Bacteria in a certain culture increase at a rate proportional to the number
present. If the number u increases from 1000 to 2000 in 1 hour, how many are present at the
end of 1.5 hours?
Solution. We have u(t) = u0 ert , we obtain
4
Example 2.3.3. If the population of a country doubles in 30 years, in how many years will
be triple under the assumption that the rate of increase is proportional to the number of
inhabitants?
Solution. Since the rate of increase is proportional to the number of inhabitants, so we get
du rt
dt = ru, then u(t) = u0 e .
Since the population is double in 30 years then u(30) = u0 e30r = 2u0 .
Thus e30r = 2 ⇒ r = ln302 .
Let the certain time t = T , the population is triple, that is, u(T ) = 3u0 that implies u(T ) =
u0 erT = 3u0 ⇒ erT = 3 which yields (for r = ln302 )
30 ln 3
T = = 47.55 Years.
ln 2
Example 2.3.4. A population of a town increases from 15,000 to 25,000 in 10 years. As-
suming that the population is growing exponentially, how long does it take the population to
increase by 40%.
Solution. We have u(t), since u0 = 15, 000, and u(t) = 25, 000 when t = 10 then 15000e10r =
25000.
Hence e10r = 5/3, so r = (1/10) ln(5/3).
Thus we obtain,
t/10
1
( 10 ln 53 )t 5
u(t) = 15, 000e = 15, 000 .
3
When the population has increased by 40%, it will be equal to
For defining the U.S population we plot the U.S population predicated by the equation (2.3.5)
[Derive from the points (t0 , u0 ) = (1790, 3.929) and (t1 , u1 ) = (1910, 91.9272)].
5
600
500
400
u(t)
300
200
100
0
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
t
600
500
400
u(t)
300
200
100
0
1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
t
140
120
100
u(t)
80
60
40
20
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
t
6
140
120
100
u(t)
80
60
40
20
1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 2000
t
u(t) = 95.93e0.02(t−1981) .
Now, we can check this formula for past population. It reflects with surprisingly accuracy the
population estimated for the period 1971 – 1991. Again, using the Proposition 2.3.1, we get
the doubling time T of earth’s population. The doubling time, T = 34.6574.
7
1000 1000
900 900
800 800
a>0 a>0
700 700
600 600
u(t)
u(t)
500 500
a=0 a=0
400 400
300 300
0 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
t t
Figure 2.4.1: Power law model (2.4.1) with initial volume u0 = 5 × 10−4 and the exponent, b = 1.05
(left) and b = 0.9 (right).
1. For b = 1.05 we can observe that the volume increases faster for r > 0 (r = a), and it
decays at faster rate for r < 0.
2. For b = 0.9, we see that the growth rate of population is slower than the case of the
other graph. For r > 0 the population still increases exponentially but at a slower rate
and for r < 0 the population reduces slowly. So, we can conclude that the growth rate
gets faster with increase in the value b.
8
26 6
x 10 x 10
12 5
4.5
10
4
3.5
8
3
2.5
u(t)
u(t)
6
2
4 r<0 1.5
1 r>0
2 0.5
u0= − (K/r) 0
0
−0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 0 2 4 6 8 10
t t
Figure 2.5.1: Graph of migration model (2.5.1) with k = 3 × 10−5 and (left) r = −5 × 10−7 , (right)
r = 2.5 × 10−6 .
Limiting behavior
If r < 0, then u(t) → − kr as t → ∞, a stable fixed point of the system.
700
600
500
u(t)
400
300 a>0
200
100
a=0
a<0
0
0 20 40 60 80 100
t
Figure 2.6.1: Graph of Gompertz model (2.6.1) with β = 1 × 10−7 and u0 = 10−4 .
du
= re−βt u (2.6.1)
dt
where r is the intrinsic growth parameter and β is the parameter of growth deceleration.
Integrating both sides by taking limits from u0 to u and t0 to t, we get:
r
(e−βt0 −e−βt )
u(t) = u0 e β .
9
The population increases exponentially over time when the growth rate r > 0, (r = a) as
seen in Figure 2.6.1. Also we can see that the population decreases exponentially over time
if r < 0 and population growth is constant if the growth rate is 0.
Food Supply Model: The growth rate can depend on many things. Let us assume that
it depends only on the per capita food supply σ and that σ ≥ 0 is constant. There will be a
minimum σ0 necessary to sustain the population. For σ > σ0 , the growth rate is positive, for
σ < σ0 it is negative, while for σ = σ0 the growth rate is 0. The simplest model is the growth
rate a linear function of σ − σ0 . Then
du
= a(σ − σ0 )u, a > 0 (2.6.2)
dt
where a and σ0 are constants, dependent only on the species, and σ is a parameter, dependent
on the particular environment. The solution of the model is
Thus the population must increase without limit, remain constant or approach 0, depending
on whether σ > σ0 , σ = σ0 or σ < σ0 .
du
= r(a − u). (2.6.3)
dt
Then the solution of the equation (2.6.3) is u(t) = a − ce−rt .
Thus u → a as t → ∞ for a > u0 and r > 0.
a 4.5
4
u(t)
3.5
u0 2.5
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3
t
Figure 2.6.2: Graph of the model (2.6.3) with r = .9, u0 = 2 and a = 4.5.
du
= ku (2.7.1)
dt
for some positive constant k. The solution of equation (2.7.2) is
u(t) = u0 ek(t−t0 )
10
where u0 is the volume of dividing cells at time t0 (initial time). Thus, free-living dividing
cells growing exponentially with time, whereas solid tumors do not grow exponentially with
time. As the tumor becomes larger, the doubling time of the total tumor volume continuously
increases.
Remark 2.7.1. To derive more accurate model of population growth, it should not consider
the population as one homogeneous group of individuals. Rather it should also subdivide
the population into males and females. Since the reproduction rate in a population usually
depends on the number of females rather than on the number of males.
du
= au − bu2 . (2.7.2)
dt
The constant b, in general will be very small compared to a, so that if u is not too large then
the term −bu2 will be negligible compared to au and the population will grow exponentially.
However, when u becomes large, the term −bu2 is no longer negligible and to slow down the
rapid growth rate of the population.
2.8 Problems
1. Describe the population growth model dx/dt = ax and comment on the effects of
immigration and emigration.
3. Describe the Malthusian model for the dynamics of a single species population. Com-
ment on its plausibility. Determine how long it takes the population to exactly double
in size under this model.
4. Discuss Malthusian model for single species population growth. Discuss the limiting
behavior of the model as t → ∞. Comment on the appropriateness of the model and
suggest some improvement.
5. The population of a city increases at a rate proportional to the present number. It has
an initial population of 50,000 that increases by 15% in 10 years. What will be the
population in 30 years?
11
7. Describe a model for population growth. Draw graph and show that when does the
population grow most rapidly.
8. Explain a single species population model together with its stability and equilibrium
point.
9. Discuss the single species population growth model with migration. Explain the lim-
iting behavior of the model. Also discuss the points of equilibrium of the model and
investigate their stability.
12