OM-B C550,551 Part 1 1
OM-B C550,551 Part 1 1
OM-B C550,551 Part 1 1
Contents
Section 1 – General – 5
1.1 Applicability 5
1.2 Preface 5
1.3 Simulated Situations in Flight 5
1.3.1 Simulated Single Pilot Operations (SSPO) 5
1.4 Normal Procedures Philosophy and Assumptions 6
1.4.1 Carriage of Passengers 6
1.4.2 Configuration Check 6
1.4.3 Altimeter Setting Procedures 6
1.4.4 Unimproved Runways 6
1.4.5 Autopilot and Flight Director Usage 7
1.4.6 Enroute Navigation 8
1.4.7 Approach Navigation 8
1.4.8 COM Setup 8
1.4.9 Checklist Organization 8
Section 4 – Limitations – 11
4.1 Operating Limitations 11
4.1.1 Non Precision Approach 11
4.1.2 Circling 11
4.1.3 LVTO Takeoff Minima if Training Requirements of OM-A are Not Met 11
0.1 Introduction
This manual describes standard operating procedures and some type specific management items in
the flight operation of
Airwork Operations GmbH
herein to be referenced as AWOG
For references, glossary, document control and Organizational management see OM-A.
For enroute procedures and areas of operation see OM-C.
For training courses and syllabi under ATO approval see applicable Training Manual TM
For training procedures not part of the ATO approval, see the primary operators manual.
Revision 1 – 18.08.2017
• Initial Issue
Section 1 – General
1.1 Applicability
This manual applies to the Cessna Citation II under ATO-approval and/or NCC-operation by AWOG.
1.2 Preface
This manual is an addition to the AWOG Training Manual (TM) and the Operations Manual OM-A. It
is divided into multiple parts. The first part contains the AWOG Procedures and profiles. The second
part consists of the Airplane Flight Manual of the C551 (AFM). Additional Parts of the OM-B provide
more information on systems, avionics and operations of the Citation II.
This part extends and explicates the AFM. It provides mandatory guidance and procedures only for
procedures and details not specified by the AFM to the detail required for AWOGs flight operations.
In no way does this manual supersede or overrule the Airplane Flight Manual.
The main purpose of OM-B is to standardise the operation within AWOG.
Flight profiles are to be seen as recommendations for the primary training sites and serve as stand-
ards for skill tests and proficiency checks. They can and shall be adapted according to the needs of
the specific mission.
The goal of the type rating training program for the C550,551 is to enable the pilot to operate the air-
craft under single pilot operations (SPO, C551 only) or multi pilot operations (MPO). However, single
pilot operations entails a significantly increased workload and is not suitable for all training opera-
tions and not advisable if another crew member is not available.
Where required for purposes of the type rating training program, single pilot operations will be at-
tained by the instructor tasking the student accordingly. This is referred to as simulated single pilot
operations (SSPO), as opposed to actual single pilot operations (SPO).
Where not stated otherwise, the flight crew shall use the CRM procedures provided in Section 5 –
Crew Coordination.
Beware that not all items referenced in the AFM of a procedure will be covered by the abbreviated
checklists. Abbreviated checklists may be used only if the crew has become familiar with the theo-
retical background of the procedure.
A standard scan flow is encouraged; however, the scan flow sequence may be changed as needed
to enable handling certain items in the most logical sequence for existing conditions.
The carriage of passengers is allowed during all types of operations, provided the restrictions under
OM-B 1.3 Simulated Situations in Flight are adhered to.
During actual or simulated single pilot operations (SPO/SSPO), the autopilot (AP) should be used in
all phases of flight above 1.000 ft AGL. For approaches with weather conditions below the published
minima times two, the autopilot shall be used in all crew configurations.
Whenever lateral or vertical guidance is available, the flight director (FD) should be used and coupled
to the relevant source. When no guidance is available, the FD shall be switched off. See the follow-
ing table as an example of AP/FD configurations for Single Pilot Operations.
Phase of Flight Lateral Guidance Vertical Guidance Mode Annunciation Example Flight Autopilot
KFC-250 Director (AP)
(FD)
Takeoff < 1.000 ft AGL Bank Pitch FLT DIR ON OFF
GO AROUND
Climb > 1.000 ft AGL Heading or NAV Pitch + Altitude FLT DIR ON ON
HDG SEL or GPSS
ALT ARM
AUTOPILOT
Cruise VOR or GPS Altitude FLT DIR ON ON
NAV or GPSS
CPLD
ALT HOLD
AUTOPILOT
Intermediate Approach Heading Altitude or Pitch + FLT DIR ON ON
Altitude HDG SEL
ALT ARM
AUTOPILOT
Non Precision Final Approach VOR or GPS Pitch FLT DIR ON ON
NAV or GPSS
CPLD
ALT ARM
AUTOPILOT
ILS, LPV or LNAV+V Localizer or GPS Glideslope or GPS FLT DIR ON ON
APPR
CPLD
GS CPLD
AUTOPILOT
Traffic Pattern >= 1.000 ft AGL Heading Altitude FLT DIR ON ON
e.g. downwind HDG SEL
ALT ARM
AUTOPILOT
Traffic Pattern < 1.000 ft AGL none none - OFF OFF
e.g. base or final
The preferred en route navigation is GPS/RNAV. When available GPSS-steering is to be used instead
of NAV-coupling.
During IFR final approach, both GPS/NAV should be set to the approach navaid and crosschecked.
The MFD should display the geo-referenced approach chart with the primary taxi chart selected as
follow-up. Wherever available, a GPS approach or a published GPS-overlay is the preferred type of
non-precision approach procedure.
During GPS-based RNP final approach, both GPS set to the applicable approach procedure. The MFD
should display the geo-referenced approach chart with the primary taxi chart selected as follow-up.
Enroute, COM 2 should be set to 121.5 and monitored, unless needed for ATIS or other purposes.
To safe battery power, if a significant delay is to be expected on the ground before engine start-up, lis-
tening watch and contact to ATC should be maintained by the use of the hand-held COM if available.
The checklists according to AFM Section 4 may be abbreviated to suit the operators needs. If they
contain less than specified in the AFM, they shall be labelled “Abbreviated Checklist”.
Four layers of information shall be provided to a student in the cockpit:
1. Memory items, learned in the ground course, and throughout the training. Memory items are
marked by a box in the QRH and are printed bold in AWOGs operator checklist (CC).
2. Operator Checklist (Cockpit Card, CC): If the training client operates on approved or de-
clared Standard Operating Procedures, e.g. an AOC, the clients CC may be used, otherwise
AWOGs Cockpit Card shall be supplied.
3. Pilot’s abbreviated checklist, QRH. In the cockpit, the printed version should be used be-
cause the quick access to the applicable pages is an important skill to acquire.
4. Airplane Flight Manual, AFM
For sources and current versions of these materials, consult section OM-B 0.1 Introduction. The four
sources shall be applied in a layer-model, so information in available in a lower layer (e.g. 2) shall be
used from the next layer, if available.
Instructors and examiners are reminded, that training flights with simulated abnormal flight conditions
constitute an accident hotspot for this class of aircraft. When planning a lesson, please remember:
That it’s within the given limitations, doesn’t mean it’s safe!
Use common sense!
Ask yourself: Risk/Benefit? Can it be done in a SIM?
These operating techniques are considered standard operating procedures. A training client may elect
to use it’s own SOPs if they are deemed satisfactory by the type manager. SOPs controlled and ap-
proved under AOC or another EASA operating regime are considered satisfactory for the purpose of
training the operators flight crew.
Section 4 – Limitations
For non-precision approaches the published approach minima or the minima laid down for category B
in OM-A 8.1.3.4 Non-Precision Approaches, whichever is higher, shall be used.
4.1.2 Circling
For circle to land approaches the published approach minima or the minima laid down for category B
in OM-A 8.1.3.6 Circling, whichever is higher, shall be used.
4.1.3 LVTO Takeoff Minima if Training Requirements of OM-A are Not Met
Not authorized.
During approach in IMC stays on instruments until MAP or visual During Takeoff:
reference. • Secures and adjusts power levers
• Calls out 60 KIAS xcheck
Initiates and calls out transfer of controls
Enroute:
Never is heads down during ground movement • Programs and sets FMS according to ATC- clearance. Calls out any
change of active WPT, DTK or NAV-source
Approach:
• FAF to MM or +1.000 ft: Monitors approach. • +1.000 ft or MM to mini-
mum: Looking for outside references
• Sets flaps and cabin comfort control according to PF request
Landing roll:
• Retracts flaps according to PF request
Abnormal: Ditching:
• Raises Radio-Contact
• Repeatedly transmits position
• Activates ELT when no radio contact on 121,5 is practicable anymore
According to EASA Part Skill Tests conducted under FCL.725(c) and Proficiency Checks for Revalidation
conducted under FCL.740.A (a) and renewal under FCL.740 (b) in the aircraft must contain certain
procedures and manoeuvres and adhere to some limitations.
Mandatory items, as listed in LBA “Examiner Report on Skill Test / Proficiency Check for Multi-Pilot
Aeroplanes and High-Performance Complex Aeroplanes with one pilot in Single or Multi-Pilot Operation –
TR MPA, SP Complex HPA MP/SP-OPS”, Version 29.10.2015.
3.9.4 Non-precision approach flown OEI with single engine go-around. Go around to be initiated at published obstacle clearance height
4.3 So satisfy the requirements of 4.3 the go-around shall be flown (OCH/A) or 500 ft above the threshold, whichever is higher.
manually
During the Proficiency Check or OPC, the candidate has to demonstrate practical knowledge of RVSM
and MNPS operation.
Flight Crew have to demonstrate their competence in carrying out normal operations within RVSM
airspace. This may be simulated when reaching RVSM/MNPS airspace is not feasible.