10 1108 - Yc 08 2023 1817
10 1108 - Yc 08 2023 1817
10 1108 - Yc 08 2023 1817
DOI 10.1108/YC-08-2023-1817 VOL. 25 NO. 5 2024, pp. 607-624, Emerald Publishing Limited, ISSN 1747-3616 j YOUNG CONSUMERS j PAGE 607
increased use of emojis leads to the question of whether they can create a new language
among technologically knowledgeable young people or devalue existing languages (Hand
et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023). Emojis (the younger generation of emoticons) are popularly
used in digital platforms to illustrate concepts and ideas. Mobile phones enable young
consumers to engage in digital platforms like YouTube, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, email,
and many other digital media, which facilitate the sharing and transfer of information via
emojis. Therefore, this current study seeks to expand research regarding young consumers’
attitudes toward emojis across digital platforms. The rapid increase in use of these graphic
symbols is often explained by emotions or expressions that are difficult to convey via words
when writing without tone of voice and body language (Ptaszynski et al., 2020; Robus et al.,
2020; Orazi et al., 2023). Organizations make use of emojis to interact with their intended
audience, reach their mobile devices, and also carry messages in stylishly modest ways
(Wang, 2021). As a result, marketing campaigns that include emojis have rapidly grown, and
organizations have received constructive results from marketing campaigns that involve
emojis. Placing emojis in digital communications tends to increase engagement, simplify
marketing messages, humanize brand voices, and increase purchase intentions (Li et al.,
2019; Lee et al., 2021; Sawmong, 2022; Mladenovic et al., 2023; Orazi et al., 2023; Wang
et al., 2023). Accordingly, the research opined that it is important to further investigate the
influence of emojis when used in marketing communications by brands, which are aimed at
gaining customer engagement and the intention to purchase from their targeted market
among young consumers, such as the Generation Z (Gen Z) cohort.
Castren (2022), Duffett (2022), and Chetioui and El Bouzidi (2023), respectively, mention
that members of Gen Z are people born between 1995 and 2012. Gen Z displays distinctive
and similar values, traits, lifestyles, characteristics, and behaviors around the globe due to
the constantly changing environment, which distinguishes this cohort from previous
generations. The Gen Z cohort is maturing into adults, making purchasing decisions, and
caring for themselves. This generation, including almost 27.5 million South Africans,
overlaps with the born free audience, the generation born in South Africa after apartheid
ended in 1994 (Lerm, 2022), so current marketers need to develop persuasive tactics to
engage with the local members of Gen Z. This study further explores the influence the
emojis have on digital marketing communication among Gen Z, which will provide
organizations and their brands with additional insight on how to effectively reach this elusive
young cohort with their advertising. Lerm (2022) states that members of Gen Z
are dependent on innovation because they have grown up with digital technology, expect to
be constantly connected, and expect seamless digital experiences. To post and engage on
digital marketing platforms, Gen Z has adopted the digital language that they understand
well, which includes emojis. Hence, emojis serve as a means of engaging with younger
cohorts, and in this study, digital marketing communications are examined together with the
features used to enhance the effectiveness of messages aimed at the Gen Z cohort.
Despite the years of emoji research, there are still gaps to fill in order to add to the emoji
knowledge discourse. In a global perspective, several studies were conducted on the use
of emoticons and emojis to convey meaning (Ptaszynski et al., 2020; Smith and Rose,
2020), which provided a basis for the study of the origins of emoji communications. So,
more research is needed on emoji interpretation to provide a greater understanding of this
new form of communication. Some research was conducted on the nature and usage of
emojis (Rodrigues et al., 2018; Brito et al., 2020). There is a gap in understanding the use of
emojis and how this new visual language influences attitudes in relation to organizations,
brands, and products, which will be examined and narrowed by this study. So, it is
important for organizations to use emojis effectively for customer engagement and intention
to purchase, since if not effectively utilized, these icons may negatively affect the quality of
online response due to divergent message interpretations. A number of studies investigated
emojis in terms of customer engagement (Zhou, 2019; Smits, 2021; Baek et al., 2022; Ko
et al., 2022; Sawmong, 2022; Wang et al., 2023), while other research explored emojis in
3. Methodology
This study employs quantitative research because it entails gathering and generalizing
numerical data from a group of people, and the study’s goal is to assess the perceptions
and behaviors of the Gen Z cohort. Saunders et al. (2007) explain that descriptive analysis
is a methodology used only to describe (as closely as possible) the actual hypotheses, so
this design was applied to this study. The study’s population includes all members of the
Gen Z cohort in South Africa. Purposive sampling (also known as judgmental sampling)
allows the researcher to use his or her discretion in selecting respondents who will best be
able to answer the study’s research questions. Hence, members of the Gen Z cohort and
only those who use digital platforms that include emojis were purposively selected at the
first stage of sampling. The snowball sampling technique is aimed at testing groups that are
difficult to access or reach (Saunders et al., 2007), for example, members of Gen Z. Hence,
the Gen Z respondents, who were purposively selected at the Cape Peninsula University of
Technology, were requested to pass on the electronic questionnaire link (Google Forms) to
their contacts in South Africa who could serve as other possible respondents as the second
stage of sampling. Consequently, the sample included high school learners, young working
professionals, unemployed young adults, and young people from varying socio-economic
status communities to ensure a diverse sample that was not only limited to students.
The self-administered electronic questionnaire format was largely adopted from Bliss-
Carroll (2016) and Zareen et al. (2017), which consisted of the screening question, digital
platform usage, and demographic factors (in the form of closed-ended multiple-choice
questions). The Likert scale questions measured consumer attitudes and level of
engagement with the emoji-integrated communications, which comprised a five-point Likert
scale. The various consumer attitude constructs were adapted from several studies, namely
trust (Mallat et al., 2008; Islam and Rahman, 2016); involvement (Zaichkowsky, 1985; Kim
and Hahn, 2015); perceived ease of use (Venkatesh and Davis, 2000; Mallat et al., 2008);
perceived usefulness (Venkatesh and Davis, 2000; Mallat et al., 2008); customer
engagement (Islam and Rahman, 2016; Sahoo and Pillai, 2017); and intention to purchase
(Duffett, 2015; Starr, 2021). The Google Form was sent out in the form of a link, which was
forwarded on various digital platforms that included WhatsApp, Facebook, Instagram, SMS
(Short Message Service), and email (snowball sampling). The survey achieved a usable
sample of 1,000 respondent questionnaires from the South African Gen Z cohort. SPSS was
used to conduct confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) as well as to assess the reliability and
validity measures, which are outlined in the subsequent section. Gaskin’s (2022) procedure
was followed to develop the casual model using AMOS, and structural equation modeling
4. Findings
The main results of Gen Z’s online and emoji usage factors were: an overwhelming majority
always or often used emojis (87.4%), a slight majority always or often engaged with emoji
brand messages (50.6%), a vast majority spent more than 3 hours per day (67.8%), and a
vast majority’s digital spending was ZAR 251–ZAR 1,000 per month. The main demographic
factors of the sample were: gender was relatively evenly distributed (male 50.8% and female
49.2%), a vast majority were aged 21–25 years (73.1%), and 26.9% were 16–20 years, and
population group (Black 56.8%, Mixed Ancestry 29.0%, and White 10.5%).
The CFA resulted in six factors (components) with eigenvalues greater than one and an
explained variance of 14.838%, 1.996%, 1.453%, 1.238%, 1.108%, and 1.010%, respectively.
The total sum of the factors explained 83.246% of the variance, which indicates a very high
and satisfactory level of correlation in the factor analysis. The factor loadings and AVE values
derived from the CFA were above 0.7, thereby exceeding the threshold of 0.5, and so reflect
convergent reliability (see Table 1). This research study’s Cronbach’s a and CR values ranged
from 0.928 to 0.957 and 0.925 to 0.954, respectively, indicating strong internal consistency
since the values exceeded the threshold of 0.7 (see Table 1). The construct mean values were
all above 3.80, which indicated a general positive sentiment toward emoji marketing
communications across the Generation Z attitude responses.
Table 2 shows the square root value of each attitudinal AVE and the standard value of
correlations between the scales. Discriminant validity was evident since the square root
AVE values for each construct were found to be greater than the correlations of the
constructs.
The heterotrait-monotrait ratio values were less than 0.85 (see Table 3), which reflects
discriminant validity (Henseler et al., 2015).
The constrained-unconstrained common method factor (CMF) models were evaluated
using a common method bias (CMB) measure. A chi-square difference of p < 0.001 was
found, indicating a considerable shared variance between the constrained and
unconstrained CMF models. As a result, the unconstrained CMF model was inferred and
employed for statistical analysis. The goodness-of-fit measures revealed a satisfactory SEM
model fit, which was verified by Khan et al.’s (2019) acceptable threshold measures: x2/df ¼
1.943; RMSEA ¼ 0.031; NFI ¼ 0.988; TLI/NNFI ¼ 0.991; CFI ¼ 0.994; GFI ¼ 0.974; and
SRMR ¼ 0.014. The constrained-unconstrained common method factor (CMF) models were
evaluated using a common method bias (CMB) measure.
Table 4 and Figure 1 show that standardized path b coefficients exhibited a positive
relationship in terms of trust ! involvement (b ¼ 0.755, p < 0.001), involvement !
perceived ease of use (b ¼ 0.644, p < 0.001), and involvement ! perceived usefulness
(b ¼ 0.408, p < 0.001), so H1–H3 were supported. A positive relationship was shown by
perceived ease of use ! perceived usefulness (b ¼ 0.468, p < 0.001), so H4 was
supported. The standardized path b coefficients exhibited positive relationships in terms of
perceived ease of use ! customer engagement (b ¼ 0.570, p < 0.001), trust ! customer
engagement (b ¼ 0.269, p < 0.001), perceived usefulness ! customer engagement
(b ¼ 0.067, p < 0.05), so H5–H7 were supported and confirmed. Positive relationships were
also displayed by involvement ! customer engagement (b ¼ 0.172, p < 0.001), customer
engagement ! intention to purchase (b ¼ 0.225, p < 0.001), and trust ! intention to
purchase (b ¼ 0.515, p < 0.001), so H8–H10 were supported. A negative relationship was
shown by perceived ease of use ! intention to purchase (b ¼ 0.468, p < 0.001), so H11
was rejected. Lastly, a positive relationship was shown by perceived usefulness ! intention
to purchase (b ¼ 0.219, p < 0.001), so H12 was supported.
Trust (TR) Marketing communications with emojis are credible 0.815 3.88 1.023 0.823 0.949 0.951
Mallat et al. (2008), Islam Marketing communications with emojis are trustworthy and secure 0.950
and Rahman (2016) I can trust brands that use emojis 0.922
Emojis are reliable when used by brands and products 0.894
Involvement (INV) Marketing communications with emojis are interesting to me 0.921 3.86 1.037 0.837 0.939 0.938
Zaichkowsky (1985), Kim My level of interest with brands and products is high, which include 0.906
and Hahn (2015) emojis
I am very involved with the use of emojis to convey meaning by 0.895
brands
Perceived ease of use Emojis in digital platforms are easy to use 0.805 4.05 0.914 0.756 0.925 0.928
(PEOU) Venkatesh and The use of emojis in brand digital platforms are easy to interpret 0.809
Davis (2000), Mallat et al. Brands can easily use/include emojis every time they text and/or 0.813
(2008) post
Viewing emojis that are used by brands requires minimal effort 0.801
Perceived usefulness (PU) Emojis improve the meaning of the message from brands and 0.864 3.99 0.944 0.769 0.930 0.933
Venkatesh and Davis products
(2000), Mallat et al. (2008) Emojis in marketing communications are convenient 0.849
Emojis in marketing communications improve efficiency 0.817
Marketing communications with emojis provide relevant information 0.736
Customer engagement (CE) I can engage with brands that use emojis anytime 0.773 3.95 1.014 0.781 0.935 0.938
engagement Islam and I always respond to the marketing communications, which include 0.809
Rahman (2016), Sahoo and emojis
Pillai (2017) Emojis effectively influence my level of online engagement with 0.796
brands
Emojis are engaging when used by brands and products 0.803
Intention to purchase (ITP) Marketing communications with emojis increase purchase intent of 0.874 3.81 1.040 0.838 0.954 0.957
Duffett (2015), Starr (2021) featured products
Emojis usage by brands and products have a positive impact on my 0.953
purchase decisions
Customer engagement
Perceived ease of use 0.630
Perceived usefulness 0.627 0.735
Trust 0.685 0.628 0.709
Involvement 0.692 0.660 0.673 0.711
Intention to purchase 0.641 0.562 0.510 0.587 0.624
Note: Discriminant validity is affirmed when the heterotrait-monotrait ratio is < 0.85 (Henseler et al., 2015)
Source: Authors own work
Notes: p-values are significant at confidence level of 1% level; p-value is significant at confidence level of 5%
Source: Authors own work
SEM was utilized to consider the hypothesized emoji digital marketing communication
attitudinal relationships. Trust explained 57.0% of the involvement variance; involvement
explained 41.5% of the perceived ease of use variance; involvement and perceived ease of
use explained 63.2% of the perceived usefulness variance; perceived usefulness,
perceived ease of use, and trust explained 65.1% of the customer engagement variance;
trust and customer engagement explained 46.7% of the perceived intention to purchase
variance. The significance, standardized path beta (b) coefficients, and total explained
variance are exhibited in Figure 1.
Research has established parallel interactions between trust and involvement among the
Gen Z cohort (Zhang et al., 2021). Customers who trust a brand are more likely to be
involved with the brand’s emoji-based digital marketing communications. Emojis make a
message easier to interpret and can be useful as an effective marketing technique to
develop a strong young customer base. The above-mentioned findings found a positive
relationship between involvement and perceived ease of use and therefore substantiate that
emoji usage in digital marketing communications led to positive attitudes. Research
confirms the findings of the current study, in other words, that involvement is related to
perceived ease of use in digital marketing communications (Liebeskind et al., 2021).
Hence, it can be concluded that emoji digital marketing communications are understood
and favorably perceived by Gen Z consumers. The study found a positive relationship that
was significant between involvement and perceived usefulness due to emoji digital
marketing communications. The Gen Z cohort is accustomed to the use of emojis, and they
prefer emojis to words since emojis express content variety in a straightforward way, which
enhances their involvement and perceived usefulness among the cohort. Jung et al. (2021)
reveal that involvement has an association with perceived usefulness. Emojis in digital
marketing communications resulted in a positive relationship between perceived ease of
use and perceived usefulness. Cavalheiro et al. (2022) found that participants who reported
that they used emoji frequently also thought emojis were useful and easy to use.
There was a positive relationship that was significant in terms of perceived ease of use and
customer engagement among the Gen Z cohort when emojis were used in digital marketing
communications. Other research agreed that perceived usefulness was related to customer
engagement (Kang et al., 2020; McShane et al., 2021). Emojis in digital marketing
communications are useful because they evoke consumer emotions and encourage consumers
to express themselves; further, it has been found that emojis convey that the transmitted
messages of campaigns are informative and effective, making them attractive, creative, and
innovative (Ko et al., 2022), which was corroborated by this study. The use of emojis in digital
References
Al-Gasawneh, J.A.A., Khoja, B., Al-Qeed, M.A., Nusairat, N.M., Hammouri, Q. and Anuar, M.M. (2022),
“Mobile-customer relationship management and its effect on post-purchase behavior: the moderating of
perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness”, International Journal of Data and Network Science,
Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 439-448.
Dmitrieva, A. (2019), The Effect of Emoji on Purchase Intentions in Digital Advertising, Erasmus University
Rotterdam.
Duffett, R.G. (2015), “Facebook advertising’s influence on intention-to-purchase and purchase amongst
millennials”, Internet Research, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 498-526.
Duffett, R.G. (2017), “Influence of social media marketing communications on young consumers’
attitudes”, Young Consumers, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 19-39.
Duffett, R.G. (2022), “Influence of YouTube commercial communication on organic eWOM, purchase
intent and purchase associations among young consumers”, International Journal of Web Based
Communities, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 87-107.
Gaskin, J. (2022), “Causal models”, available at: https://statwiki.gaskination.com/index.php?title¼
Causal_Models (accessed 7 December 2023).
Hao, X. (2020), Targeting in the New Digital Age, University of TX, Austin.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M. and Sarstedt, M. (2015), “A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in
variance-based structural equation modeling”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Vol. 43
No. 1, pp. 115-135.
Hong, I.B. (2015), “Understanding the consumer’s online merchant selection process: the roles of
product involvement, perceived risk, and trust expectation”, International Journal of Information
Management, Vol. 35 No. 3, pp. 322-336.
Huang, X., Kader, M.S. and Kim, S. (2022), “Let’s play with emojis! How to make emojis more effective in
social media advertising using promocodes and temporal orientation”, Journal of Research in Interactive
Marketing, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 665-682.
Islam, J.U. and Rahman, Z. (2016), “Linking customer engagement to trust and word-of-mouth on
Facebook brand communities: an empirical study”, Journal of Internet Commerce, Vol. 15 No. 1,
pp. 40-58.
Jung, B., Kim, H. and Lee, S.H.S. (2021), “The impact of belongingness and graphic-based emoticon
usage motives on emoticon purchase intentions for MIM: an analysis of Korean KakaoTalk users”, Online
Information Review, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 391-411.
Kang, K., Lu, J., Guo, L. and Zhao, J. (2020), “How to improve customer engagement: a comparison of
playing games on personal computers and on mobile phones”, Journal of Theoretical and Applied
Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 76-92.
Kang, H., Park, Y., Shin, Y., Choi, H. and Kim, S. (2022), “What makes consumers’ intention to purchase
paid stickers in personal messenger? The role of personality and motivational factors”, Frontiers in
Psychology, Vol. 12, p. 678803.
Kato, S., Kato, Y. and Ozawa, Y. (2018), “Perceived usefulness of emoticons, emojis, and stickers in text
messaging: effect of gender and text-messaging dependency”, International Journal of Cyber Behavior,
Psychology and Learning, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 9-23.
Khan, G.F., Sarstedt, M., Shiau, W., Hair, J.F., Ringle, C.M. and Fritze, M.P. (2019), “Methodological
research on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): an analysis based on social
network approaches”, Internet Research, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 407-429.
Kim, J. and Hahn, K.H. (2015), “The effects of self-monitoring tendency on young adult consumers’
mobile dependency”, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 50, pp. 169-176.
Ko, E.E., Kim, D. and Kim, G. (2022), “Influence of emojis on user engagement in brand-related user
generated content”, Computers in Human Behaviour, Vol. 136, pp. 1-17.
Lee, J., Kim, C. and Lee, K.C. (2021), “Investigating the negative effects of emojis in Facebook sponsored
ads for establishing sustainable marketing in social media”, Sustainability, Vol. 13 No. 9, pp. 1-15.
Lerm, N. (2022), “Gen Z are the hottest new audience”, available at: www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/
347/227548.html (accessed 20 June 2023).
Leso, B.H. and Cortimiglia, M.N. (2022), “The influence of user involvement in information system
adoption: an extension of TAM”, Cognition, Technology & Work, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 215-231.
Li, X., Chan, K.W. and Kim, S. (2019), “Service with emoticons: how customers interpret employee use of
emoticons in online service encounters”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 45 No. 5, pp. 973-987.
Liebeskind, C., Liebeskind, S. and Yechezkely, S. (2021), “An analysis of interaction and engagement in
YouTube live streaming chat”, in Li, W., Seo, D. and Han, M. (Eds), 2021 IEEE Smartworld, Ubiquitous
Intelligence & Computing, Advanced Trusted Computing, Scalable Computing, Communications,
Internet of People and Smart City Innovation, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York,
NY, pp. 272-279.
Lim, L., Dae-Kil, K. and Watts, S. (2011), “An empirical study of the usage performance of mobile
emoticons: applying to the five-construct model by Huang et al”, Journal of Information Technology
Applications and Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 21-40.
McShane, L., Pancer, E., Poole, M. and Deng, Q. (2021), “Emoji playfulness and brand engagement on
twitter”, Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 96-110.
Purwanto, S., Hartini, S. and Premananto, G.C. (2020), “Narrative online advertising as external variable
in the development of the technology acceptance model of go-pay for millennials”, Journal of Accounting
and Strategic Finance, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 118-135.
Robus, C.M., Hand, C.J., Filik, R. and Pitchford, M. (2020), “Investigating effects of emoji on neutral
narrative text: evidence from eye movement and perceived emotional valence”, Computers in Human
Behaviour, Vol. 109 No. 2, pp. 1-11.
Rodrigues, D., Prada, M., Rui, G., Margarida, G. and Diniz, L. (2018), “Lisbon emoji and emoticon
database (LEED): norms for emoji and emoticons in seven evaluative dimensions”, Behavior Research
Methods, Vol. 50 No. 1, pp. 392-405.
Sahoo, D. and Pillai, S.S. (2017), “Role of mobile banking servicescape on customer attitude and engagement:
an empirical investigation in India”, International Journal of Bank Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 7, pp. 1115-1132.
Saunders, N.K.M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2007), Research Methods for Business Students, 4th ed.,
Pearson Education, London.
Sawmong, S. (2022), “The role of personality traits and engagement factors towards the use of paid
stickers in personal communication messages”, F1000 Research, Vol. 9 No. 11, pp. 1-21.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F. and Tondeur, J. (2019), “The technology acceptance model (TAM): a meta-
analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in
education”, Computers & Education, Vol. 128, pp. 13-35.
Sharma, V.M. and Klein, A. (2020), “Consumer perceived value, involvement, trust, susceptibility to
interpersonal influence, and intention to participate in online group buying”, Journal of Retailing and
Consumer Services, Vol. 52, pp. 1-11.
Sindhu, P. and Bharti, K. (2023), “Influence of chatbots on purchase intention in social commerce”,
Behaviour and Information Technology, pp, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 1-22.
Smith, L.W. and Rose, R.L. (2020), “Service with a smiley face: emojional contagion in digitally mediated
relationships”, International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 301-319.
Smits, T. (2021), Emoji Use and Its Effects on Customer Engagement in a Social Media Marketing
Context, Radboud University, Nijmegen.
Starr, M.H. (2021), The Influence of Type of Implicit e-WOM on Purchase Intention, George Fox University.
Suki, N.M. and Suki, N.M. (2011), “Exploring the relationship between perceived usefulness, perceived
ease of use, perceived enjoyment, attitude and subscriber’s intention towards using 3G mobile services”,
Journal of Information Technology Management, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 1-7.
Tseng, T.H. and Hsieh, S.H. (2019), “Determinants of emoticon usage in mobile instant messaging: a
construal level theory perspective”, Behaviour & Information Technology, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 289-301.
Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (2000), “A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four
longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 186-204.
Wang, C.L. (2021), “New frontiers and future directions in interactive marketing: inaugural editorial”,
Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 1-9.
Wang, X., Cheng, M., Li, S. and Jiang, R. (2023), “The interaction effect of emoji and social media content
on consumer engagement: a mixed approach on peer-to-peer accommodation brands”, Tourism
Management, Vol. 96, pp. 1-14.
Yang, K. (2023), “How sajiao (playing cute) wins forgiveness: the effectiveness of emojis in rebuilding
trust through apology”, Discourse & Communication, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 77-95.
Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1985), “Measuring the involvement construct”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12
No. 3, pp. 341-352.
Zareen, N., Karim, N. and Khan, U.A. (2017), “Psycho emotional impact of social media emojis”, Isra
Medical Journal, Vol. 8 No. 4, pp. 256-262.
Zhang, M., Ding, S., Liu, Y., Li, H., Zhu, Y. and Qin, C. (2021), “Influence of emojis on online trust among
college students”, Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 12, pp. 1-10.
Zhang, S., de Jong, M.D. and Gosselt, J.F. (2022), “Microblogging for engagement: effects of prior
company involvement, communication strategy, and emojis on Western and Chinese users”, Journal of
International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 34 No. 5, pp. 616-630.
Zhou, Q. (2019), Understanding User Behaviors of Creative Practice on Short Video Sharing Platforms: A
Case Study of TikTok and Bilibili, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati.
Further reading
Vanga, S.R. and Yang, Y. (2019), Perceptions and Motivations of User Engagement for Social Media
Marketing. A Quantitative Study of Facebook and Instagram Users, Uppsala University, Uppsala.
Ms Mihlali Maraule holds a Master of Marketing degree in Marketing from the Faculty of
Business and Management Sciences, Cape Peninsula University of Technology, Cape
Town, South Africa. She is employed in the Omni Marketing Department and works in the
Sports Department. Mihlali is passionate about digital content, marketing, and advertising,
as well as studying consumer behavior and attitudes, which also form the basis of her
research.
For instructions on how to order reprints of this article, please visit our website:
www.emeraldgrouppublishing.com/licensing/reprints.htm
Or contact us for further details: permissions@emeraldinsight.com