International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
International Journal of Health Sciences and Research
ABSTRACT
Forensic medicine deals with the application of medical knowledge to aid in the administration
of justice. It is used by the legal authorities for the solution of legal problems, as in cases of
injuries, hanging, homicides, sexual offences, infant deaths, poisoning, etc. In short it deals with
medical aspects of law. Hence, it is very essential for the medical officers to have thorough
knowledge of the subject and opine on cases. With this background the study was aimed to
assess the knowledge of medico legal autopsy and various other prospective of medico legal
work among government medical officers of Chitradurga districts. A cross sectional survey was
conducted during district meeting held at DHO office Chitradurga districts seeking the
permission from DHO, Chitradurga. The medical officers were given a questionnaire, containing
questions regarding autopsy and other medico-legal work. Most of medical officers have
responded for questionnaire and the data so obtained will be analysed using MS excel.
Key Words: Medical officer, District Health Officer, Autopsy, Injury, Crime scene
It is obvious from table 2, that slightly more than half of (54%) Medical Officers are
aware of autopsy technique fully while 46 % are not aware. More ever 54% of them don’t know
what things to be done when they visit crime scene also four fifth (80%) of medical officers are
not aware of exhumation procedures, astonishingly about two third (66%) are fully aware of the
procedure of examining sexual offense cases.
Table no 3 shows that 84% (no-42) of doctors have the opinion that Conducting Post
Mortem at their centre hampers doing clinical work and reason may be their busy clinical work
makes them to give less time for Conducting Post Mortem. Majority (96%) of them feel that it’s
better if the medico legal autopsy was compulsorily carried out by Forensic Expert, as they are
not trained enough.
Table 3: Attitude of medical officers regarding post morerm.
Frequency Percentage(%)
1.Does Conducting Post Mortem At Your Centre Yes 42 84
Hampers Doing Your Clinical Work No 8 16
2.Do You Feel It Is Better The Medico Legal Autopsy Yes 48 96
Should Be Compulsorily Carried Out By Forensic Expert No 2 4
From the table 4 it’s obvious that of doctors consult any Forensic Expert while
about two third of doctors will open all 3 giving the final opinion. Maximum of
cavities in all cases of autopsy (72%), Visit doctors (92%) have not conducted
crime scene whenever necessary(66%) and exhumation till date in their service and
write manner of death in post mortem most of them are doing medico-legal work
report(74%). Slightly more than half (56%) includingconducting Post Mortem (96%)
Table 5 reveals that about two third doctors are satisfied with both the Post Mortem
reports used by them (56%) and Injury certificate which they give. Majority (84%) of them are
satisfied with the opinion which they give on sexual offense cases and more than two third (66%)
are not satisfied with the opinion on age of individual, but surprisingly none (100%) are satisfied
with the opinion on skeletal remains.
The reason for the above figures may themselves updated with various aspects of
be because of not being trained properly or medico-legal service.
not witnessed medico-legal cases during The concept of subject of Forensic
their second year MBBS medical course in medicine in India is based upon the pillars of
Forensic medicine subject in which they are British Medico-legal system. But as the time
going to learn and also not keeping elapsed their law and legal enforcement
systems were developed very fast than us.
How to cite this article: Gouda S, Ajay KS, Govindaraju HC et al. A kap (knowledge,
attitude and practice) study on medico legal knowledge among government medical officers
in Chitradurga district, Karnataka. Int J Health Sci Res. 2013;3(11):61-66.
*******************